A significant majority of French now support banning the radical Salafist sect of Islam, and the government reinstating the national state of emergency, as the nation reels from another deadly radical Islamic terror attack in March.
As the fallout of Europe’s suicidal immigration policies manifests itself in jihad attacks, as well as in spiraling crime, no-go zones and massive debt, the personal impact is felt more keenly in France and all across Europe. Legitimate fear, not “Islamophobia” as some would have it, is growing. Now:
Perhaps most significantly, 88 per cent of French said they supported banning the rapidly expanding, radical Salafist sect of Islam, even though over half of respondents said they acknowledged that implementing the ban in France would be difficult, if not impossible.
The “radical Salafist sect of Islam” teaches the same jihad ideology that is taught by Wahhabis and the Muslim Brotherhood. This ideology has no place in the West. It is backed up by Quranic verses, as well as by the Sunnah; consequently, it is being preached in mosques in the West. These mosques are waging war against unbelievers across the West, while Western authorities cower in fear of being branded “Islamophobic.”
Many Western leaders still do not accept this war as a religious war, even though it has been proclaimed as such in documents of the Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamic State and al Qaeda.
Foreign-funded mosques have been allowed to freely propagate jihadi/Salafi ideology. A good start for Westerners toward this so-called “impossible” task of rooting out Salafist ideology, a task that is supported by the French people and increasingly by other citizens of the West, is: i) declaring the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization, ii) surveilling mosques (as was done in churches to find mafia thugs), iii) deporting those found to be complicit in jihad activity, and iv) voting out treasonous political leaders.
The West has been a sitting duck in the face of the fact that “every jihadist terrorist we’ve seen in Europe in recent years came from the Salafist scene.”
One can deal with issues of actual intolerance and bigotry while also dealing with the reality of jihad terror. The problem is that Muslim Brotherhood (MB) groups (and their water-carriers) continue to push the “Islamophobia” agenda in order to stymie efforts to rid of the West of the Islamic supremacist and jihadi menace. They do so by branding anyone who casts light on the jihad ideology and terror as “Islamophobic.” In other words, Muslims can do any and everything with no consequences; otherwise the accusations of “Islamophobia” will fly. Islamic State mujahideen are running free in many Western countries. This “Islamophobia” subterfuge has in effect created a two-tier legal system: one for Westerners and one for Muslims. Political correctness driven by the MB serves as a convenient win-win for Islamic supremacists: the more a country is Islamicized and the more abuses that occur, the more the reporting will be deemed to be “Islamophobic.”
In reference to those deemed by France to be dangerous jihadis:
France admits to there being approximately 20,000 people on that list, meaning thousands of individuals could be deported from France should the will of the overwhelming majority of French citizens be translated into government policy.
“French Overwhelmingly Back Deporting Terror Suspects, Banning Radical Islam”, by Oliver JJ Lane, Breitbart, April 2, 2018:
A significant majority of French now support banning the radical Salafist sect of Islam, and the government reinstating the national state of emergency, as the nation reels from another deadly radical Islamic terror attack in March.
The new poll taken days after four were killed by a self-proclaimed member of the Islamic State killed four in southern France found the French public overwhelmingly backing a significant crackdown on radical Islam and deportations that could impact tens of thousands of people.
Perhaps most significantly, 88 per cent of French said they supported banning the rapidly expanding, radical Salafist sect of Islam, even though over half of respondents said they acknowledged that implementing the ban in France would be difficult, if not impossible.
Breitbart London has previously reported on the nature of Salafism, which contains many radical preachers who see violence as legitimate in pursuance of its aims and which provides the intellectual basis for the Islamic State. A regional director of Germany’s constitutional police said of the faith in 2017 that “every jihadist terrorist we’ve seen in Europe in recent years came from the Salafist scene”.
In addition to banning the radical interpretation of Islam, a majority of French surveyed also supported deporting terrorists, too. Le Figaro reports 83 per cent supported deporting foreigners on French soil who have so-called ‘S’ (security) case files on them held by the security services — the French term demonstrating that an individual is considered a potentially dangerous radical by the French state.
France admits to there being approximately 20,000 people on that list….
Walter Sieruk says
It’s a very good idea of the French authorities to ban “Radical Islam.” Nevertheless, this leads to the question of What is “Radical Islam” The answer is that it’s part of a religion a religion. The religion of Islam For Islam’s “holy book” the Qur ‘an [the Koran] instructs on the use of violence and killing for the advancement of Islam. As found in ,for example 2:191. 4:89. 5:33. 9:5,111,123. 47:4. Furthermore, it may be illustrated that if Islam is represented as a tree then the fruits then the fruits of that tree are the many brutal, violent and deadly jihad terror entities. Such as ISIS, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, al Shabaab , Hamas, Hezbollah, P.I.J. etc. With this statement, the Wisdom of the teachings of Jesus may, very much, apply to this subject. For Jesus taught “Ye do know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.” After saying this Jesus told them what He told them when He said “By their fruit ye shall know them.” Matthew 7:16, 17, 18,.20. [K.J.V.] In conclusion, Islam is a corrupt tree and also a false religion, Proverbs 14:12. John 14:6. First John 2:22,23. 4:14,15. 5:12,13,20.
PRCS says
What is “Radical Islam”?
The answer: there is neither a moderate nor a radical “version” of Islam.
There is Islam. Amputations and all.
No Muslim practices “radical Islam”, as there is no such thing. They practice Islam. Some more seriously, more “religiously” than others.
—
So, dear French men and women, who will “ban” what people believe, what they think from their minds. How will the content of Islam’s texts–what they say, teach, command, and expect of every Muslim–be banned, and by whom? Will the Internet be purged of every reference to Qur’an and sunn’ah?
The problem is Islam. Written, Orthodox Islam
Until that is understood…..
Guy Jones says
Exactly.
gravenimage says
True, guys–but this is still better than French people just assuming Islam is a “religion of peace”. it is closer to the truth.
PRCS says
At this late date, after all the damage inflicted upon the French nation, on it’s customs and culture–much of it public and violent–there is no excuse for kuffar French men and women to not “get it”.
Lavéritétriomphera says
Do not see french problems through your american eyes (if you are American). Many French people have no religion. They think that jihadists are just criminals practicing a (evil) cult.
PRCS says
If they don’t “get it”, yet–it’s not because they’re secular.
Rather that they are willfully ignorant.
Lavéritétriomphera says
I have already said it, Macron and his wife Brigitte are not fools.
We have enough Muslims in France, and we know Koran in Arabic, and translators have even made connections with Syriac, Hebrew and Aramaic and they have been able to decipher the original language of Koran.
SweetOlBob says
Oh, GOODIE ! And the stupid, socialistic, bastards didn’t elect Le Pen !
Oh give us our cake and let us eat it too ~ We are French and that doesn’t require thought !
DP111 says
Too late for banning Islam radical or not, and too late for deporting a few Muslims here and there.
The only strategy that will save France and Europe is a civil war – winner takes all.
p_m_bay says
there is no radical islam.. There is only islam
Michael Copeland says
Question for the French:
What is the non-radical “interpretation” of “Kill them wherever you find them”?
b.a. freeman says
😀
good one!
mummymovie says
Nice, Michael!
This one belongs in our one-liner hall of fame!
Lydia Church says
Seconded!
p_m_bay says
Or what is penalty for apostasy
Buraq says
“The more Islam changes, the more it stays the same!” (Future French saying.)
Terry Gain says
Plus ca change, plus qu’il reste la meme. E&OE.
Terry Gain says
Radical Islam is the Islam practiced by Muhammud in Mecca at the beginning when he was lying hi ass off as he tried to create a following. True Islam is the Islam practiced by Muhammud after he migrated to Medina.
Both brands of Islam are enemies of freedom.
Bill says
It is too late, even if the numbers . The French are disarmed, basically operating under shadow Sharia now and the politicians will not change anything because they will remain in power and use their military and police apparatus to silence opposition. The attack on “underground Islam” or the “Salifists” amounts to the creation of a meaningless distinction that will allow Macron and his ilk to serve up pablum to the masses while he continues to enslave them as EU serfs.
Guy Forester says
You hit the nail on the head, Bill. The police and military are there to protect the elites and oligarchs and keep them in power. They are not intended to protect the public nor to apprehend criminals any more. The people are to be kept disarmed and powerless, censored and voiceless.
You will see greater emphasis on removing any civilian access to any kind of useful weapon and censorship of any kind of speech deemed worthy of silencing. If it is not done directly by government (as in china or EU) it will be done indirectly (as in the current MSM and internet “moderators” here in the US).
gravenimage says
Even in France–the Western European nation most riddled with Muslims–tghey still only make up 8% of the population. It is *not* too late.
Guy Jones says
I agree, but, the will to turn the Islamic tide of darkness is clearly lacking, amongst the European leadership. The will to self-preservation; the will to defend secular democratic values; the will to stand up to totalitarianism. Courage and fortitude simply don’t exist, so, supremacist Islam triumphs, in the void. As did National Socialism, before it.
MFritz says
Too late and too little.
mummymovie says
Yeah, sadly, France is pretty much f**cked at this point, what with several generations of Algerian-origin French moslem citizens inhabiting the country, on top of the islamic invasion of African men, praying in the streets, fully effective jihad subjugatiion, and multitudes of other issues.
The degree of their problem is so extreme that this talk of proposals that include trying to distinguish between “Salafists” or “Wahabbists” and regular mozlems, and all of that kind of bulls**t is just plain silly, and in all certainty, efforts to execute on a half-assed plan like that will essentially have the effect of a fart in the wind.
I think it is encouraging, though, that the French public is now behind trying to do something, and is now behind having this “national discussion” (I hate overused, cliche, mainstream media terminology)…
at least until the next jihad attack, which this kind of talk has already almost certainly put into planning mode by the swarms of jihadists in the country.
mummymovie says
What would really be encouraging, is something like the Swiss are proposing:
http://barenakedislam.com/2018/04/02/switzerland-passes-law-that-will-deny-citizenship-to-virtually-all-muslim-migrants-and-asylum-seekers/
gravenimage says
With all respect, there is too much preaching surrender here.
The above article is proof that French people are waking up to the threat of Islam. I find it very heartening.
MFritz says
You’re thinking too much like an American, gravenimage. We Europeans always know when there’s a terrible and bloody struggle ahead of us and we’re never eager for it.
It’s not rolling over, it’s only admitting that time for any better option is over.
gravenimage says
MFritz–with all respect–I *don’t* believe things are hopeless yet in France.
And not just because I’m basically an optimistic American (although I am).
Europe itself has faced worse than this–in Spain, in Greece, in the Balkans–and has struggled back.
Indiana Tom says
French overwhelmingly back deporting jihadi suspects, “banning radical Islam”
I overwhelmingly back deporting Muslims, “banning Islam”
mummymovie says
Elementary, my dear Tom.
Slightly encouraging though it may be, this whole thing is too tinged with appeasement: The French really need to just cut to the chase, at this point.
This “Salafist”/“Wahabbist” distinction is going to be impossible to make and enforce, and they know it: I mean who among these multitudes of cockroach imams infested throughout the cities and the countryside is going to raise their hand now and say “I’m a Salafist- Please come monitor me”?
Sadly, I fear this “bone-throwing” is a semantic ruse, which basically amounts to more of the same appeasing lip service to the country’s entrenched moslem inhabitants.
Guy Jones says
This represents another fallacy vis-a-vis non-Muslims’ understanding of Islam, to wit, the notion that only certain “fundamentalist,” or, “radical” Islamic sects are problematic, whereas allegedly “mainstream” Islam is deemed to be tolerant and benevolent and wholly compatible with secular democratic principles. Similar to the other oft-repeated fallacy spouted by the Left, regarding the notion of the much-lauded, but, theologically non-existent, “moderate” Islam.
The problem is Islam — PERIOD. An ideology that calls itself “Submission” and whose founding text calls for the killing or subjugation of non-believers is intrinsically and irredeemably supremacist, totalitarian and evil. What is so hard for the Islamic apologists and collaborators to understand about this?
gravenimage says
French overwhelmingly back deporting jihadi suspects, “banning radical Islam”
……………………
Really good to hear!
dumbledoresarmy says
How do you eat an elephant?
One bite at a time.
The *exact same* technique – the salami slice – that *Muslims* have used to get thus far, in France and elsewhere, CAN and SHOULD be used against them.
Start with all identified ‘Salafist’ mosques, preachers, and ‘activists’, that is, recruiters and jihadis and enablers and persons providing finance, etc.
One by one by one, identify them, shut down and raze the mosques, expel the imams (very important; when C S Hurgronje was advising the Dutch on how to govern Muslim Indonesia, he was very strong about the need to crack down on the jihad-fomenting imams; when the Dutch did that, things simmered down considerably), round up – NOT all at once, but in batches – the most obviously-fanatical mohammedans and give them the boot.
Concomitantly, resolutely enforce the hijab ban in schools and universities; enforce, rigorously, the *burka* ban.
A crackdown on mass threat displays = aka ‘prayers’ – that obstruct the public thoroughfares and / or occupy historically-secular public spaces, should also happen: take it one case at a time.
Concomitantly, figure out a way to take back – NOT all at once, but suburb by suburb – the most heavily-Islamised areas.
Note – if ALL identifiable ‘Salafists’ – the rabble-rousers and jihad-fomenters, the sharia-pushers, the plotters and those on the ‘watch’ lists – were ALL removed from France, **along with their extended families**, AND all associated mosques were not only raided but razed and shut down and the land resumed by the French state, for infidel purposes, and assets seized, for the bankrolling of further self-defence against jihad (and perhaps also for compensation for families of persons wounded or killed by jihad attacks that have already happened on French soil) – the power and presence of the Ummah on French soil would be very considerably reduced.
And I’m sure they could then move on to other subsets of the Ummah.
*All* illegal Muslim immigrants, or those who are discovered, on investigation, to have committed fraud in the course of obtaining ‘refugee’ status and residency or citizenship, could be identified and expelled. Not all at once. Just start in one part of France and work away at it steadily, focusing first of all on the known lawbreakers and fraudsters.
All non-citizen Muslims on the terrorism ‘watch’ list could be expelled, along with their extended families.
All dual-citizens on the ‘watch’ list could have their French citizenship annulled and be packed off back to the country – say, Morocco, Algeria, etc – that comprises the other part of their citizenship.
And all with French citizenship who are on the ‘watch’ list, known to the authorities, could be interned, the more conveniently to keep an eye on them… and while the laws are quietly rejigged to permit the stripping of citizenship from those who are manifestly an Enemy Within, fifth-columnists.
At the same time, applying the precautionary principle, ALL admission of Muslims, from anywhere, into France, could be stopped. No more immigrants. No more ‘students’. No more ‘businessmen’. No more ‘tourists’… better safe than sorry, the price of those petrodollars spent by Saudi head thugs has turned out to be waaaay too high.
Eric jones says
Hear. hear.
Eric
Islofob IS-1 says
Ban it, close the Mosques, deport those who spread the “faith” known as islam, and shut down the teaching of it to the young.
Some may say it is not possible in the United States, however anything that is in opposition to our laws, and our Constitution is a direct threat to our way of life. Reading the qur’an is one thing, but truly following it’s teaching places our way of life under threat.
The faith of islam is opposed to the first Ten amendments to our Constitution, and those who follow islam can never accept our laws.
Ban islam, and remove it from our great Republic.
DP111 says
Salafist, Falafelist, same difference. The goal is dominate the world by Jihad
Eric jones says
Its never too late to resist Islam. To give up is to commit genocide on one self.
Eric