In its lengthy hit piece on Mike Pompeo and John Bolton, which I discussed at length here, the New York Times says this about Secretary of State-designate Mike Pompeo’s opposition to jihad terror and Sharia oppression:
Wa’el N. Alzayat, who was a Middle East expert at the State Department and senior policy adviser to Samantha Power, the former United Nations ambassador, said of Mr. Pompeo’s comments, “Imagine if this stuff had been said about Jews, or African-Americans or Chinese-Americans. And yet, we’re living with an administration that is actually rewarding people with racist views or racist associations with some of the highest positions in our government.”
Right, Wa’el. “Imagine if this stuff had been said about Jews, or African-Americans or Chinese-Americans.” Yeah, and imagine if the stuff that was said about Charles Manson had been said about your Aunt Rose. Wa’el N. Alzayat is relying on people’s ignorance about Islamic doctrine and history. Nothing in the history of the Jews, African-Americans (except for the Nation of Islam, the Black Panthers, etc.) or Chinese-Americans is remotely comparable to the 1,400-year war of Islamic jihadis against the rest of the world, which has raged without respite or reformation against Europe, Africa, Central Asia, India, and beyond.
But few Americans know this history, and even fewer know the truly shocking extent of the global devastation that jihad has caused. That’s why I wrote my forthcoming book The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS, which you can preorder here now. The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS is the first and only comprehensive one-volume history of jihad, not just against Europe and the West, but in India and worldwide, in the English language. It’s the first book to tell the whole truth about Islam’s bloody history in an age when Islamic jihadis are more assertive in Western countries than they have been for centuries.
Equip yourself to counter the lies that are so casually told by the likes Wa’el N. Alzayat. Preorder The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS.
gravenimage says
Muslim former State Department official likens opposition to jihad terror to bigotry against Jews, blacks, Chinese
……………..
How *dare* you filthy Infidels object to Muslims raping and murdering you. How bigoted…sarc/off
jihad3tracker says
HELLO GRAVENIMAGE— Thank you for posting many excellent comments during several years of Jihad Watch contributions in about 7 seven years since I first discovered Robert Spencer’s blog.
John Bolton + Mike Pompeo petrify the elite media and political left because Bolton and Pompeo know Islam’s agenda for subjugation and slaughter.
I often mention web resources strictly focused on counter-jihad, but here are two others: www [dot] thefederalist [dot] com / www [dot] steynonline [dot] com.
Federalist has an absolutely brilliant array of contributors on various topics. Steynonline is Mark Steyn’s weekly smorgasbord of fascinations.
gravenimage says
jihad3tracker has been posting here for quite some time, Jay Boo–probably not a long as you and I–I’ve been here since 2006 and I know you have been here for many years–but this is not a contest.
jihad3tracker says
HELLO JAY AND GRAVEN —
In 2011, reading about an OFFICIAL SAUDI KINGDOM BEHEADING of a woman for SORCERY, was the first time I landed at Jihad Watch.
I would never “brag” about discovering Robert Spencer’s 24/7 counter-jihad work. And I often mention his associate at AFDI, Pamela Geller, the bravest civilian in our United States.
BOTH OF THEM RISK THEIR LIVES EVERY DAY. We are ALL in the effort to prevail against Islam’s intent to eventually subjugate or kill Infildels. Muhammad’s pals will never stop.
Jarvis Davis says
The imbedded islamic apologists did nail Gen. Michael Flynn but, fortunately, haven’t yet been able to touch Bolton or Pompeo. So glad to see them on board!
gravenimage says
OK, Jay Boo. 🙂
gravenimage says
True, Jihad3tracker. I am glad when people discover Jihad Watch. And seven years is a long time, in any case.
mortimer says
HOW DARE YOU DIRTY KUFAAR objective to being TRICKED, CONQUERED, ROBBED, KILLED, ENSLAVED, RAPED, TORTURED and EXTORTED !
How bigoted can you get?
Don’t you DIRTY KUFAAR realize that by PROTECTING YOUR HUMAN RIGHTS you are actually FIGHTING ALLAH.
Allah wants Muslims to REMOVE the human rights and civil liberties of WOMEN and ‘OTHERS’.
jihad3tracker says
HELLO AGAIN JAY BOO — Thank you for that video by David Wood.
Here is one of his shortest posts: truth for clueless family, friends, pastors, rabbis, priests: “THE JIHAD TRIANGLE”
There are many more — :Please, for newbies or others who have not yet discovered him, take a few minutes from our busy days.
BC says
“And yet, we’re living with an administration that is actually rewarding people with racist views or racist associations with some of the highest positions in our government.”
Muslims are the worst racists of all time as they are against all members of the Human Race who are not and refuse to be Muslim. So in fact Omama appointed people with support for Islam to his White House as well, many with extremist connections and viewsl
Ray Jarman says
BC, You would have enjoyed working at the US Dept. of State during the Hussein/Clinton and Hussein/Kerry regimes. A female, person of color and add Islamic to the profile could not be refused tenure. There was one such person working as a political officers at one of the embassies in eastern Africa who was completely useless and showed up when she felt like it and her inputs to discussion papers had to be constantly rewritten but she was granted tenure. If she had been of any other religion (cult in the case of islam), she would have been told to find work some where else. In many of the embassies where both Christians, Animists and other non-muslims exist with muslims, the muslims are almost always chosen over better qualified applicants. I pray that Mike Pompeo and John Bolton will clean this mess up because I hear that the outgoing SECSTATE seemed too busy with other matters.
Rick Schwab says
Preach it, BC!!
epistemology says
That’s the the problem. I’m terrified that in American newspapers they spread the same propaganda as in Western European ones, although the NWT doesn’t surprise me. I’m afraid the American mainstream press is still infiltrated by Obama’s guys.
Anyway this is part of their strategy muzzies always play the victim card. Robert is great, “imagine what was said about Charles Manson was said about your aunt Rose”
Robert I hope until the book is released it will also be available on a Kindle.
Andy says
Let’s debate Islam!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlbXaSNtivs
Carol (the 1st) says
Good poem by Carol in Telford so I copied it out:
We march to show our anger
We march to show our fear
We march to show our government
The things that we hold dear
Our precious children’s future
Our precious children’s lives
Our precious children’s innocence
That’s been stolen by their lies
We march to show our masters
That we see right through their scheme
We march to show our government
That we’ll shatter their evil dream
We march to show our backbone
We march to show our strength
We march to show our government
That on ourselves we will depend
We march because we’re British
We march because we’re proud
We march to show our colours
And we’ll always shout out loud
Our government won’t beat us
We will never bow the knee
To the evil plans of Islam
We Britons will be free!
Linnte says
This is a marvelously brave woman! I think it was she who took the video of the cops refusing to follow the law about Muslims(or anyone else) praying at Hyde Park. I wish I could hang out with her in Britain, cuz we two old ladies would get into T R O U B L E !!!!!!! Hahahahah!
gravenimage says
Great stuff–thank you. I hope there are more brave Britons like her!
Lydia Church says
Uh, jihad terror IS bigotry against all other people groups!
It’s like “Huh? You DON’T want to be terrorized? How strange!”
mortimer says
Exactly, Lydia. A SADIST doesn’t understand that his VICTIMS object to his TORTURES.
J D S says
The whole western world has lost its cotton pickin mind!
No one and I mean no one should uphold Islam in any way and what is Islam made up of? Muslims!
Bigotry, racism, …this is what Muslims practice when promoting Islam as the only religion….personally I don’t class Islam as an actual God based religion and don’t think it should be afforded religious status as set forth in our constitution. Only religions that are truly God based should be allowed to enjoy our religious freedoms.. I do think this is what our farmers of the constitution were thinking of. Any so called religion that promote murder, rape, slavery,lying, cheating and on and on can not be GOD based…..THE PROBLEM IS….ACCORDING TO THE TEACHINGS IN ISLAM THESE ATROCIOUS THINGS ARE NOT ,SO TO SPEAK,—-ILLEGAL–They are APPROVED in the Koran and handits and by the words coming from the mouths of the Muslim elites.
I find NO PLACE in the New Testament where Jesus tells me yo kill anyone…not so with islam..nuf said!
boakai ngomby says
” …THE PROBLEM IS….ACCORDING TO THE TEACHINGS IN ISLAM THESE ATROCIOUS THINGS ARE NOT ,SO TO SPEAK,—-ILLEGAL–They are APPROVED …”
and as approved the slaves (muslims) of the allah god of islam (unknowable; the best of all deceivers) seek to eliminate TRUE RIGHTEOUSNESS, ABSOLUTION, and RENEWAL extended to humanity by the LIVING GOD AND LORD.
not to forget, as well, there seems to be strongly exerted effort – TOLERATED BY STATE’s silence – to eliminate FAITH, LIFE, and HOPE in the ONE TRUE GOD, to be found wherever the OT/NT is taught and learned. there seems to be preferred immoral standards that are not what free people live by, but are what people (individuals) are destroyed by..
this policy advisor HATES what the allah god hates.
i’m glad he’s out of a job and wish he’d be quieted somehow. i don’t wish anyone at STATE to portray to the world that SHARIA culture is the best way to exist.
mach37 says
I believe that the only reason the First Amendment does not exclude Islam (“Musselmen”) from the “freedom of religion” clause is because, at that time, the Atlantic Ocean presented a barrier to travel – a thirty to sixty day ocean voyage separated the Muslim World and the New World.
The only significant presence of Muslims in the New World at that time was in 1805 when the Tunisian envoy Sidi Soliman Mellimelli and his attendants made a short visit in Washington, D.C. Islam was a nonexistent threat to American religious freedom. Any claim that Muslims had any part in building the USA is pure fantasy on the part of Obama, and his sycophants in the Media.
gravenimage says
mach37, Muslims–like Nazis or Communists or any other Fascists–have full freedom of speech.
What they do *not* have is the right to incite violence and wage Jihad against us. This is not included in American rights.
Kell says
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot? This baffoon, Wa’el N. Alzayat, actually said that out loud? His target audience, the libtards, apparently prefer to get their ‘knowledge’ of islam from the people who are here to behead them…..for some suicidal reason. There is no hope for those who ignore reality. If 1400 years of jihad and hijra are to be ignored then they have made an excellent argument for their own slaughter.
esther says
I agree with Wa’el. The details of the PACT OF UMAR should be imposed on the Muslims
of the United States. Those details which disenfranchise ALL but muslims including the right to
bear arms and to ride on horses——and subways and buses—should be imposed on muslims.
Muslims should be barred from public office and from employing non muslims and they should
be subjected to pogroms on their communities if one of their number TOUCHES a bible
Yokel says
If your friends, colleagues and acquaintances need the details spelling out, get them to try this:
https://enjoytheconditionsofomar.blogspot.com/
George Williams says
I’m having a hard time keeping up with stocking my library with your books, Mr Spencer.
Robert Spencer says
This is my best and most important book, crowning all my efforts. If you can get only one and you’re wondering which one to get, this is the one.
Peter says
Jews, blacks, and Chinese don’t go around slaughtering, enslaving, subjugating, forcibly converting, dehumanizing, or stealing from people who don’t share their religious beliefs; Muslims do, and they have been doing it for 14 centuries.
Recall that the people who did similar things recently to the Yazidis were often their Arab Muslims neighbors.
Islam and its adherents are a threat to 80% of humanity. Pointing out that threat is not Islamophobia, it is I S L A M O R E A L I S M.
mortimer says
ISLAM IS VERY RACIST.
rubiconcrest says
I am glad that Wa’el N. Alzayat is no longer working at the State Department. It is no surprise that attitudes like this were represented at the state department during the last administration. The question is how many more traitors like this are still there gumming up the works.
Isabellathecrusader says
Hi Robert,
I’m totally buying this book. Thanks for writing it!
Isabella
Robert Spencer says
Thank you, Isabella. Good to see you here. Hope you are well and prospering.
Ren says
Islamic doctrine is bigotry against Jews and non-muslims.
mortimer says
SLAVERY AND RACISM = NORMATIVE ISLAM
The earliest texts of Islam clearly and unselfconsciously promote Arab racial superiority and openly declare the inferiority of black Africans. It is obvious that such texts are authentic and reflect the times they were written. The pioneers of Islam were all Arab supremacists.
Tabari II:11 “Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were cousins of the Turks. Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth. He prayed that the African’s color would change so that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks.”
The above text is plain and clear that all prisoners of war must either be killed or become slaves. The ancient scholars are in full agreement over this issue, such as Ibn Timiyya, Ibn Hisham, Ibn Malik, etc.
“The root of the beginning of slavery is prisoners of war; the bounties have become lawful to the nation of Mohammed.”
Ibn Timiyya (Vol. 32, p. 89)
Next, clearly and without shame, he states:
“Slavery is justified because of the war itself; however, it is not permissible to enslave a free Muslim. It is lawful to kill the infidel or to enslave him, and it also makes it lawful to take his offspring into captivity.”
Ibn Timiyya (Vol.The Koran not only assumes the existence of slavery as a permanent fact of life, but regulates its practice in considerable detail and therefore endows it with divine sanction. Muhammad and his companions owned slaves, or acquired them in war. Muhammad’s scripture recognizes the basic inequality between master and slave, and the rights of the former over the latter (Koran, 16:71; 30:28). The Koran assures the Muslim the right to own slaves (to “possess their necks”) either by purchasing them or as bounty of war (58:3). Its author, Muhammad, had dozens of them, both male and female, and he regularly sold, purchased, hired, rented, and exchanged slaves once he became independently wealthy in Medina after the confiscation of Jewish property. The ‘bounties’ are lawful to the Muslim, theologian ibn Timiyya wrote, and slavery is justified: “It is lawful to kill the infidel or to enslave him, and it also makes it lawful to take his offspring into captivity” (Ibn Timiyya says,Vol. 32, p. 89). In line with the racist views of Muhammad about his own people, the Arabs, as “the noblest of all races,” they were exempt from enslavement (Ibn Timiyya states,Vol. 31, p. 380)
So Islam not only allows for Muslims to capture slaves in wars, yet the sons and daughters of these slaves are also legal properties of the captor Muslim!
The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:
“Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.
When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.”
Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.
“A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”
The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”
Lebel says
“1,400-year war of Islamic jihadis against the rest of the world, which has raged without respite or reformation against Europe, Africa, Central Asia, India, and beyond.”
Empire building is only wrong when done by Muslims.
Conquest is integral to the human adventure, it’s the harsh reality.
WPM says
1-“Conquest is integral to the human adventure it,s a harsh reality” so resistance is not worth the effort submit to Islam ? If death is also a part of human adventure why fight it ? Is getting mug rob rape part of the human adventure these things happen all over the world done by all kinds of people should we expect that to be a happy part of our daily lives. Should we not resist people raping us, mugging us ,they are only trying to make our life adventure interesting?
2-The “Empire building is only wrong when done by Muslims” it is wrong when done by Nazis , mad dictators , people who enslave all they conquered .America much of Europe. and Russia defeated Germany and Japan 73 years ago ,did we enslave the Germans or Japanese ? Did we kill all the citizens off in those countries if they did not convert to a religion of our choice ? Did we tax them into poverty and submission if they keep their own culture ? The harsh reality is we will resist your” empire building” even if your leaders and their appeasers living in our free world have a hissy fit that we suppress your” freedom of religion” an ideology that ties to crush all human freedom.
Lebel says
“Conquest is integral to the human adventure it,s a harsh reality” so resistance is not worth the effort submit to Islam ”
Not at all, you should fight it. I think that’s how it work. Invasion, resistance, new order. Rinse and repeat.
“people who enslave all they conquered .America much of Europe. and Russia defeated Germany and Japan 73 years ago ,did we enslave the Germans or Japanese ”
No but you killed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians. I am guessing that was wrong according to you, right?
The slavery was done before, just like everyone else btw. What do you think the west was doing at around the time of the Islamic conquest? writing human rights legislation?
Terry Gain says
Lebel
Your comment. Is another moronic attempt at equivalence.
Empire building is always wrong when it is done by barbarians. Muslims are the worst of barbarians and the most insufferable because when they aren’t conquering they are whining. Those who have no issue with sex-slavery are the scum of the earth, especially those who claim it is sanctioned by God
Muslims were engaged in slavery for 800 years before European nations. Christians ended slavery except in Muslim nations.
Lebel says
“Muslims were engaged in slavery for 800 years before European nations. Christians ended slavery except in Muslim nations.”
Didn’t the Romans have slaves? how about the Greeks? was that not before Islam?
Or how about the Anglo Saxons enslaving the Britons in 500 ? “War was probably the biggest source of slaves. As invading Angles and Saxons swept across the country many native Britons were taken captive. These would often be women and children, since enemy warriors were more likely to be killed if caught. ”
source:http://www.buildinghistory.org/bristol/saxonslaves.shtml
I will grant you that they might have been secret converts like Obama so maybe it is Islam’s fault.
Jokes aside I think the main issue is that your ignorance is being manipulated by people like RS. He knows that you don’t know history so he is constructing an alternative history where everything bad is the fault of Islam or where things are only bad when does by Muslims. Thus we have your reaction.
Chand says
What?!
The followers of other gods and religions, including the followers of the non violent prophet Jesus were plunderers and invaders too!!??
WPM says
Yes they did not plunder in Jesus name ,Jesus did not tell people rape, slavery, women of the right hand murder were things that you do to get to Heaven. Jesus did not torture people ,Jesus did not say to slay nonbelievers of Christianity ,or say their is a death sentence for leaving Christianity .There are Hindus ,Christians, Jews ,who do bad things have rape and murder people .None to my knowledge do it following the instruction in their Holy Books only the Moslems following Islam doing those thing are following the instructions in their holy books. Have their been evil people who have done terrible things in this world who claim to be Christian ,yes can they point to the Holy Bible to justify their deeds no. Everyday many Jihads are performed everywhere in this world many times a day violent acts the people doing these acts can quote the Koran passages to justify their acts. Mohammed is consider the perfect man in Islam according to Islam you should try to be like Mohammad. Mohammed by his own admission was a violent man who murder anyone who question his authority, who hurt his pride ,he murder for profit ,he rape for pleasure ,own slaves a warlord of his time, Jesus never own slaves, was not violent ,treated women around him with kindness ,never murder anyone, took and answer people who question his authority with answers and guidance .Jesus never said you should conquer and subdue with force all people who disbelieve you.
Mark Swan says
Yes Chand—you’ll find all sorts of bad people regardless of religion—Muslims follow the prescriptions of their Quran that does tell them to do bad things.
Lebel says
Yeah but they all misunderstood the peaceful teachings of Jesus so it doesn’t count. Yes millions are dead but it’s not the fault of Christianity it’s the fault of the misunderstanders of Christianity.
Of course, Christians still get to keep the conquered land because well, you know.
Mark Swan says
Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith—
in accordance to its Holy Book.
Christianity that tries militant proselytizing is doing so against its Holy Book.
Any religion that tries to use force to spread is wrong.
Any religion that teaches violence is wrong.
No religion should teach violence is acceptable behavior.
Carol (the 1st) says
Lebel…you seem to “overlook” that once Christ was born the faith took root and spread without coercive, predatory bloodbaths throughout the Middle East, Africa, etc. The faith spoke for itself and in its simplistic, healthy beauty was not inclined to be easily “misunderstand”. Not so with Islam, a broad brushstroke of deceit and bloodshed trace its cancerous and needlessly predatory growth. It’s enough to make you wonder if they NEED violence in order to feel alive. And yet these “true believers” only wind up with something that totally sucks for everyone here on earth. Even their idea of heaven is very materialistic, venal and quite limp.
If you love something, set it free. If it comes back to you it’s yours; if it doesn’t then it never was.
Norger says
You have outdone yourself with this one. False equivalence to the point of absolute absurdity.
So we should consider Islam as being essentially a force of nature and have “0” moral expectations of Muslims. Just pathetic.
Lebel says
Interesting, please demonstrate how this is moral equivalence.
So yes, I see no difference between Islamic empire building and other empire building.
Conquest is bloody whether done by Muslims or anyone else. Why you cannot see that is honestly beyond me but I understand that reading jihadwatch can do that to a person.
WPM says
So your answer is we the non Moslems should be as bloody as the Moslems and not try to debate or talk about morals or common ground but kill off all Moslems or be part of the Moslem new empire ?”Conquest is integral part of the human adventure “eat or been eaten .RS bring this up because there less and less talking or debating going on. Any one talk negatively , or debating Islam or saying there is a problem with Islam, or poking fun at Islam faces death threats from Moslems and is treated by the MSM as a Nazi no other major religion has this problem today.RS website is devoted to exposing problems with Islam are their are other problems in the world yes .Are there other evils in the world yes. If I want to repair my Honda accord would I go to a website that told me how to improve my lawn?? no I would go to a website devoted to Hondas better Honda accords. If I want to find out about the weather I go to a weather website the people there would address the weather . Jihad watch covers Jihad ,there are other websites that take the Islamic point of view you could post the links here feel free . Post your views on how, we could solve the problems of violence in society as a whole here feel free. You offer nothing but in the past people of many faiths kill one another so fighting goes on Islamic terrorist kill people life goes on why talk empire building part of the human adventure .
Carol (the 1st) says
lebel…what happened on “Hurt a Muslim Day”? Did we come anywhere close to properly retaliating for about 39,000 freelance “warrior” assaults on innocent kafir victims since 9/11? I think our Christianity had more than a little to do with the inexplicable lack of reciprocal barbarity – either that or the fact that “no one fights ‘crazy’.”
gravenimage says
Lots of fine rejoinders above to the appalling Lebel.
gravenimage says
As Lebel well knows, the civilized West has been very *self critical* when it comes to its history. The idea that the West is engaged in empire building now is quite false–his claim that everyone does this and it just a “harsh reality” is bullsh*t.
Though he certainly appears to be fine with Islam’s bloody slaughter and subjugation of unbelievers. Given his appalling posting history, this does not surprise.
More:
“Conquest is integral to the human adventure it,s a harsh reality” so resistance is not worth the effort submit to Islam ”
Not at all, you should fight it. I think that’s how it work. Invasion, resistance, new order. Rinse and repeat.
…………………………..
Lebel writes as though the concept of democracy and civilized relations between nations had never occurred to mankind, and that there is nothing but bloody conquest and counter conquest. That he views the world in this way and tries to get us to do the same is both false and grotesquely ugly.
More:
“people who enslave all they conquered .America much of Europe. and Russia defeated Germany and Japan 73 years ago ,did we enslave the Germans or Japanese ”
No but you killed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians. I am guessing that was wrong according to you, right?
…………………………..
We were defending against being conquered by Fascists. As soon as the Axis powers surrendered, we stopped. There was nothing punitive about our actions. And Germany, Italy, and Japan are all sovereign nations–we did not conquer and take over these nations.
More:
The slavery was done before, just like everyone else btw. What do you think the west was doing at around the time of the Islamic conquest? writing human rights legislation?
…………………………..
It was the West that *abolished* slavery–does the perverse Lebel hope we have forgotten this? Meanwhile, the Muslim world has *never* abandoned slavery, practiced on the model of the “Prophet” Muhammed himself. In fact, slavery is undergoing a bloody resurgence in the Muslim world. Note that Lebel has not a word of criticism for this.
Would he have us believe this is another “harsh reality” of the human condition, despite the fact that it is only going on now under Islam?
More:
“Muslims were engaged in slavery for 800 years before European nations. Christians ended slavery except in Muslim nations.”
Didn’t the Romans have slaves? how about the Greeks? was that not before Islam?
Or how about the Anglo Saxons enslaving the Britons in 500 ?…
so maybe it is Islam’s fault.
…………………………..
What claptrap. No one said Muslims invented slavery, any more than they invented things like beheading and pedophilia–just that they have not only enthusiasitcally embraced these horrors, but *sacralized* them. And note that Lebel has to go back centuries to find non-Muslim examples.
More:
Jokes aside I think the main issue is that your ignorance is being manipulated by people like RS. He knows that you don’t know history so he is constructing an alternative history where everything bad is the fault of Islam or where things are only bad when does by Muslims. Thus we have your reaction.
…………………………..
What claptrap. I have a degree in history, and know the history of Islam all too well. It is not ignorance that Lebel is worried about here, but *knowledge*.
The idea that if only we truly understood the supposedly benign nature of bloody Islamic conquest that we would welcome it is ludicrous.
And, of course, Islam has not always been the only threat–but it certainly is the main one today. Lebel hopes we filthy Infidels haven’t noticed that.
More:
Interesting, please demonstrate how this is moral equivalence.
…………………………..
Pretending there is no difference between civilized people defending themselves and bloody conquest to impose the horrors of Shari’ah is the very definition of false moral equivalence.
The idea that we don’t embrace this false moral equivalence only because we read Jihad Watch is also ridiculous. This is a fine and site, but does not have a monopoly on moral teaching, as Lebel pretends.
Baucent says
“Wa’el N. Alzayat, who was a Middle East expert at the State Department and senior policy adviser to Samantha Power, the former United Nations ambassador,”
Hopefully Pompeo will weed out “Middle East experts” like Alzavat who push the muslim victimhood train. rewrite history and deny the intent of the Islamic teachings.
Terry Gain says
I am glad to see Alzayat attack Popeo and Bolton. It will promote discussion as to how on earth this enemy of American freedom came to be appointed to the State Department.
America’s submission to Islam began with George Bush claiming that Islam is a religion of peace when it is neither. It is an Ideology Of Conquest which is more dangerous and insidious than even communism and nazism because it promote itself as a religion and receives the protections of a religion.
As bad as Bush was in not understanding Islamic doctrine and history, Obama was worse. He deliberately lied about it and promoted Islam as always being part of America. The fact of this jihadist Alzayat being employed by the State Deoartment is a result of an Obama Presidency that considerably advanced Islam’s goal to conquer America.
As Barack Hussein Obama inadvertently but correctly stated no (legitimate) religion condones killing. Since Islam not only condones killing (and rape) but mandates killing it is not a legitimate religion.
We need to deal with reality of Islamic doctrine and history or we too will be conquered. We can begin by disputing these false charges of racism and a frank discussion Islam’s satanic doctrine and barbaric history.
Naildriver says
The presence of Muslims in the USA is seen most openly in travel, as they now operate or own many, if not most, the smaller motels and stop and go gas stations, particularly in the poorer sections of any city..
Muslims also have a big presence in hospitals as many come to the country to fill the short falls in needed doctors nurses and other medical technitions, caused by the ‘high’ standards the AMA. Cheap Muslim labor practically make up the entire meat packing workers, and certain agricultural factories.
George Bush would say they take jobs Americans are too lazy to work, as he said of the millions of Mexican and Latin Americans who come here. Such are the rationalizations of traitors.
But it is greed and treason that has created this dangerous infestation. The excuse from Globalists to destroy this country is that it is in our national interests. Necessary! But it is not. It is treason!
If one points out the Muslim’s religion, Islam, would have its devotees murder, rape, intimidate, and make war upon all non Muslims to further its growth and imperitives, George would say any place of worship is better than no church — he did say something to that effect regarding his alcoholic rehabilitation. And then, nevermind Obama’s contributions to Islam’s inroads. Treason!
We’ve had exceedingly bad political leadership since 9/11 Out right treason.
The enemy, Islam, is upon us, and infests all of our institutions, and devoted Muslims have a plan to see their Islam reign at the expense– nay! the destruction of the Constitution and our way of life.
The irony is those upon the Left, particularly women, gays, Jews, on the left, who assisted these greedy globalist traitors stand to suffer the most from this new inclusion of Islam — an enemy one would have thought given 9/11 would have seen American wrath — instead George actually assisted the murderers.. It is sad testimony to the age of propaganda, greed and a drugged majority.
gravenimage says
Actually, in my expericence many motel owners are Indian Hindus, not Muslims. Muslims do make up most cab drivers, though.
WPM says
+1
The past 30 years America leadership has try to appease this mad dog ideology Islam the past 8 years under Obama were the worst . It seems only as a nation we are waking up to the nightmare of Islam. The lefts love affair with Islam is sad it is like a wife backing up her husband who beat her to a pulp ,she figures if she resists the beating it will get worst. Does she not know it will be the death of her if she does not leave him??When will the left wake up to Islam strong belief it wants them all dead?
Kasey says
Was this guy one of Obama’s early appointments to that high office with the State Department?
Norger says
“Imagine if this stuff had been said about Jews, or African-Americans or Chinese-Americans.”
Imagine 30,000 plus terrorist attacks committed by blacks, Jews or Chinese people over the last 15 years or so. Imagine thousands of Jews, blacks or Chinese from dozens of countries flocking to join a triumphalist jihad horror machine. Imagine blacks, Jews or Chinese as part of an international movement seeking to replace our government with a brutal religious theocracy. Imagine hundreds of millions of Jews, blacks or Chinese adhering to an ideology that calls for the death penalty for: apostasy, blasphemy, adultery, homosexuality etc. etc. etc. What nonsense.
Savvy Kafir says
Opposition to the Nazi ideology, and it’s implementation, is not “bigotry” or “racism”.
It’s exactly the same with Islam.
Some ideologies REQUIRE opposition from decent people — no matter how offended its devotees might be.
Bezelel says
There are more people waking up. The muslims keep trying tho, I’m posing this Intellectual Froglegs youtube for some conservative entertainment and because in a brief touching on islam Mr Gorman says,” an islamaphobe is someone who knows too much about islam” Enjoy it if you wish
Bezelel says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtsuKROxoS4
Andy says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRbiyxGMWh0
The Truth About Social Media
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgwluZdJwpo
gravenimage says
Robert Spencer is on Facebook and Twitter. He is not a zombie.
Bezelel says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtsuKROxoS4
second try
Politicianophobia says
Well here in Canada we have a Muslim, Pakistan, born member of parliament introducing M-103–blasphemy law and Imam Mazim Abdul-Adhim, Canadian head of Hibz ut-Tharir, scheduled to speak at the upcoming Hibz ut-Tharir/ terrorist conference in Mississauga, Ontario. We have a keynote speaker coming to the Muslim Family Conference who calls Jews monkeys, pigs aggressors of filth. We have a Prime Minister who says on the Canadian, Liberal, Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), “Islam is not incompatible with Western, secular democracy.” When I speak to people about this, I am called a racists, and to that I say “Islam is not a race, please read the Qur’an.” I am always shocked at the number of collaborators there are, people who refuse to read or talk about it. Is it 1935?
Politicianophobia says
I am tired of terror, traitors and Trudeau. 2019–184 Liberals have to go.
Politicianophobia says
On a sadder note, Cyril Winters, the 70 year old man who was arrested under the Ontario Government “Bubble Law” has died. He was having a stent put in and he did not make it. Sad to see what happened to this patriot. Shame on the Ontario Government, the cowards. Free speech hmmmmm.
gravenimage says
So sorry to hear this.
paul budrunas says
Evidently this guy thinks that everyone he’s talking to is an uninformed dumbass that has not read the Quran…not me, Buster…I’m onto all of this Islamic murderous bull crap these Neanderthals believe and I actively spread the word about these pieces of s**t and their F***ed up psychopathic beliefs. I have opened the eyes of a whole bunch of people re: these subhuman inbreds.
Lebel says
@WPM
“So your answer is we the non Moslems should be as bloody as the Moslems and not try to debate or talk about morals or common ground but kill off all Moslems or be part of the Moslem new empire”
Not at all, I am happy that you are talking about debate. I am saying that historical Islam’s empire building was no different that other people’s empire building. I agree that we should be talking now instead of trying to kill each other.
Mark Swan says
Lebel—you can feign being happy about debate all you want—your sole purpose here is to
muddy the water—cloud up the truth—fog the view—It will only bolster this site and the
posters here—your approach has been tried so many times before—it strengthens and
does not weaken the resolve here against Islam’s intent.
gravenimage says
The idea that supremacist Muslims bent on forcing Infidels to submit to the horrors of Islam just want to debate is, of course, obvious claptrap.
dee says
The average American IS ignorant of the history of Islam. These are great examples to seize upon to educate people.
Anyone who values their freedom should obtain a copy of the Qur’an, and read through a bit. Look at Europe, and seek not to go their way…
Linnte says
One of my hopes for Bolton is for the issue of Islam/Muslim being a RACE. I want him to hit it directly on the head and pound it out of existence.