• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Tariq Ramadan rape accuser says he told her he was raping her “because you don’t wear a hijab”

Apr 23, 2018 8:00 am By Hugh Fitzgerald

There are new items of interest to those following the tale of Tariq Ramadan, here  and here.

The first item is about Tariq Ramadan’s health. It’s partly old news: the claim that he has been suffering from multiple sclerosis — apparently, according to his lawyers, “since 2006,” though it was only revealed after he was arrested — and that in detention, they further claim, he could not possibly receive the medical care he needs. Some may have suspected he was only playing “le malade imaginaire,” in order to gain sympathy and obtain release from prison, to be put instead under house arrest. But here is the new news: a medical report ordered by the judges has concluded that Ramadan does indeed have multiple sclerosis. At the same time, it has also been concluded, on the basis of testimony by both doctors and prison authorities, that proper medical treatment is compatible with his detention (which his lawyers insisted was not possible), and that he will be receiving all the medicines he requires and, as well, assured of four weekly sessions with a physiotherapist (how many M.S. sufferers receive as much?). The French authorities are keenly aware that his lawyers, and his vast following — those two million Facebook friends and 200,000 followers on Twitter — will be keeping track, eager to claim that he has not been provided with proper treatment. The magistrates are determined not to provide grist for Ramadan’s mill.

The second item of interest has to do with the ongoing charges of rape by three women in France, which Ramadan has always denied, as he has denied, until now, any sexual contact with them. After consultation with his lawyers, Ramadan has now decided to change his story in one respect. He now admits to a “relationship” with his third accuser, “Marie,” but not to her version of those relations. “He knows her, he had a relationship with her, but not what she described,” said Ramadan’s lawyer, Emmanuel Marsigny. Ramadan does admit to consensual sex with “Marie.” “Marie,” it should be noted, was at one time an escort girl, which does not help her in making a claim of being sexually violated by Ramadan, even though she had given up that line of work long before. So what was their relationship, according to Ramadan? His lawyers have not said. But It is likely to be this: he was not her rapist but her client, possibly one who “paid” for her services not just with money but also with the wisdom that that “towering intellect” and “foremost scholar of Islam” imparted to her, a clearly troubled soul.

Ramadan continues to claim that he had no sexual encounters of any kind with the other two French women, Henda Ayari and “Christelle.” By admitting to a long-running adulterous liaison with this ‘Marie,”  his lawyers may have concluded that this could make his denials, as far as Henda Ayari and “Christelle” are concerned, more believable. Certainly we will now see, all over the Internet, his supporters holding up his revised account of his encounters with “Marie,” not as evidence of Ramadan’s meretriciousness but, rather, of his essential truthfulness.

Ramadan has undoubtedly concocted a story to explain away the initial lie. I should imagine it will go something like this: “When I was first asked about ‘Marie,’ I denied having relations with her, not because I feared a criminal charge — I knew I was completely innocent of that — but because I did not want to hurt my wife. I wanted to protect her from having to learn of my encounters with ‘Marie,’ I wanted to protect my family. Is that so hard to understand? But as I saw the French judicial system at work, with all these people relentlessly determined to bring me down — and I knew, of course, this whole campaign had more to do with my role in explaining Islam than with anything else — I realized that the truth of my meetings with ‘Marie,’ this escort girl, however embarrassing and banal, had to be told. But before I told anyone else, I first had to tell my wife. She had to learn it directly from me, and not from a sordid and twisted newspaper account. She understood. Of course it saddened her. How could it be otherwise? But our marriage is strong enough to survive my moments of madness with the lady who hides behind the alias ‘Marie.’ And if she still insists our sexual relationship was not consensual, for which I paid and am still, though in a very different way, paying, then I have a question for her: Is it really conceivable that over several years, in different cities, you came knocking at the doors of my various hotel rooms, begging to be admitted, in order to be raped? That is simply unbelievable. Of course the sex was consensual. It could not have been otherwise.”

“My illness, my multiple sclerosis, is one great worry for my family. And these wild charges of rape, of which, let me repeat, I am completely innocent, are another. But as long as I have my wife’s faith, and that of my children, and the unwavering support of so many people who, having attended my lectures, or seen them online, and read my books, or listened to my audio tapes, and then befriended me on Facebook — I think there are now two million of them — or follow me on Twitter, I am content. They know the truth about me. I will face this ordeal as I have faced others, with serenity, with  faith, sure that even in today’s France, with this incredible hostility to Muslims, no matter how long it takes, justice will ultimately prevail.”

The third item of news about Ramadan  is contained in an interview with Henda Ayari in early April on the Egyptian Dream channel, in which she describes how she stopped being a Salafist and became a liberal Muslim, why she wrote her book, and why Ramadan first contacted her. He had seen her Facebook posting, in which she did not wear a hijab, and — ever the moralist — wrote to chastise her for not being a good Muslim.

Here is a transcript of Ayari’s interview:

I decided to write my book following the [2015] Bataclan terrorist attack. I was shocked when I saw the victims, the killings, and the blood on TV. I realized that political Islam and the Salafis constitute a danger.

I was coerced into marriage when I was twenty. I went to Tunisia on vacation, and within a day, I was married to a Salafi man I did not know.  For the subsequent ten years, I lived as a prisoner with that man. I gave birth to three children and wore the niqab. We traveled to Saudi Arabia, where he wanted us to settle. He used to beat me up and had no respect for me. One day, I decided to run away with my three children.

When the Bataclan attack took place, I decided to tell my story on my Facebook page. I posted my pictures before and after – at age twenty, wearing a robe, and at age 38, without even a hijab. I wrote that I had used to be an imprisoned, oppressed woman. Today, I am a free woman. Following my Facebook post, I was contacted by the Flammarion publishers. They suggested that I write a book and tell my story, in order to help other women. I also founded an NGO to help women.

In that book, in a chapter I titled “Zubair,” I wrote about what had happened to me. A man I had admired raped me. That man is Tariq Ramadan.

[…]

There are French women who converted to Islam, and who, by the age of 17-18, have two or three children. They were married at a very young age. Some 16-year-old girls were contacted by Salafi Islamists via Facebook, and then had a religious marriage via Skype.

I know a girl who was contacted by a man. He signed a religious contract with her over Skype. At night, he had sex with her, and she got pregnant. Then he dumped her. In France, many girls who converted to Islam are miserable, because they are abandoned, forgotten and deserted, with children. They receive no help or support. They wear the hijab and are not sure whether to keep it on or take it off. They are miserable. I was contacted by elderly French people whose children converted to Islam. They do not know what to do, and they contact me for advice, because their children do not want anything to do with them. One man told me that his daughter refuses to talk to him altogether, ever since she converted to Islam. She had a religious marriage with a Salafi man.

I think that there is a real problem. Why do the French fear Islam? Because of those Islamists, who use Islam in order to control and imprison women, and in order to accomplish political goals. I denounce this. I remain a Muslim and am proud of my Islam. I am a secular feminist who defends women’s rights. Today, I call upon French politicians to help NGOs like mine, so that these NGOs can help women.

[…]

There are also girls who were recruited on Facebook and the Internet to go to Syria. I know girls who tried to travel to Syria “after communicating with a guy on Facebook. The guy would then propose that the girl go to Syria. I know a guy who traveled there. He was told that he would be working for a humanitarian organization, but, in fact, these guys are used as cannon fodder. These guys are being sacrificed in the war, believing that this is Islam. The women are used like whores or captive slavegirls to give birth to children.

[…]

In 2012, I posted on Facebook a picture of myself without a hijab. That day, Tariq Ramadan wrote to me: “Assalaam alaykum, sister Henda. How are you? What you are doing is not good.”

[…]

He said that I was drawing the gaze of men and that this is not good. I thought that this couldn’t really be Tariq Ramadan. Tariq Ramadan would not have sent me such a message. I wrote back: “Tariq Ramadan wouldn’t have time for this. You are impersonating him.” He wrote: “I really am Tariq Ramadan. If you don’t believe me, I’ll prove it to you.” He suggested that we move to Skype. I agreed, and he switched on the camera, and I saw the real Tariq Ramadan in front of me. I was shocked. It was incredible. I didn’t expect this – Tariq Ramadan talking to me, taking an interest in me, appearing before me. I was a little shocked. Then he said he could call me if I wanted. He asked for my phone number, and suggested that we meet the following Saturday.

[…]

I considered him to be like a big brother or an imam. I had a lot of questions about Islam that I wanted to ask him, and besides, I had a chance to meet someone I admired. I trusted him. I didn’t expect him to turn against me.

[…]

He said: “You should come up to my hotel room, because there are many people who might recognize me. It’s better if we talk in my room, where it will be quieter.” Since I saw him as a brother and an imam, I trusted him completely. I admired him and thought him to be the model Muslim man.

[…]

[When I got there], he went to wash his hands. Then he shook my hand and gave me a welcome kiss. I didn’t expect this, but I admit that I let him do it. Then, all of a sudden, his behavior changed. He became very violent toward me. He pushed me onto the bed, and that was it. He did what he did.

[…]

When he pushed me onto the bed, I said no. I said to him that these things could get out of hand. This only made him angrier, and he did what he wanted. He was very violent. I thought I was going to die that night because he choked me and slapped me. He said to me: “This is what you are asking for because you don’t wear the hijab.”

So here is Tariq Ramadan, the great exponent of a moderate and ethical “European” Islam, who turns out to be not much different from the “religious police” in some Middle Eastern county, insisting that Ayari should wear a hijab; her failure to do so “is not good.” She repeats this: “He said that I was drawing the gaze of men and that this is not good.” Of course, Tariq Ramadan knew whereof he spoke. He had his own “gaze” drawn to her and suggested that she give him her phone number, and they could subsequently arrange to meet. He soon called her; they met at his hotel where she thought the great man would provide her with his wisdom — “I had a lot of questions about Islam that I wanted to ask him” — and he suggested that too many people would recognize him in a public space, and that things would be ”quieter” in his room. She saw him as “a brother and an imam,” she “trusted him,” and so they went to his room where her ordeal at the hands of this serial rapist, and violent sexual predator, began.

And at the end of it all, Tariq Ramadan, having ripped off the mask of the “moderate” Muslim and expert in Muslim morality and ethics, told Henda Ayari that “you are asking for [the slapping, the choking, the violent rape] because you don’t wear the hijab.”

That tells us a lot about the real Tariq Ramadan. The misogynistic moralist lecturing Muslim women on proper behavior is on display. So is the maniacally violent serial rapist who explains, and excuses, his own behavior, claiming it was brought on by a victim’s own islamically inexcusable behavior — it’s all there, in that last reported remark. Henda Ayari deserved what she got, Ramadan told her, “because you don’t wear the hijab.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Hugh Fitzgerald, Moderate Muslims, sexual assault and rape Tagged With: Henda Ayari, Tariq Ramadan


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Stacy Girl says

    Apr 23, 2018 at 8:27 am

    Race accuser?

    • mortimer says

      Apr 23, 2018 at 8:47 am

      Typo, obviously. The important matter is that Tariq Ramadan believes that MUSLIM MALES have a DUTY TO HUMILIATE UNVEILED WOMEN.

      He believes that RAPE IS A GOOD DEED that punishes women who do not observe Sharia law.

      Under Sharia law, there is NO PUNISHMENT for raping a KAFIR WOMAN and there is practically NO WAY TO PROVE RAPE against a Muslim woman under Sharia law.

      That means there are practically NO RAPISTS PUNISHED in Muslim countries. Women in those countries never bother to charge the man, since a woman’s testimony counts for only half of a man’s… and kafirs are not permitted to accuse a Muslim.

      • b.a. freeman says

        Apr 23, 2018 at 4:49 pm

        actually, mortimer, a muslim woman *dare* not accuse a man of rape in a country with sharia enforced; it takes 4 *male* witnesses to be able to prove rape; if the woman doesn’t have them and persists in her accusations, she will be accused of either adultery if she is married or fornication if she is not; both are punishable by death. in point of fact, some 70% of the women in prison in saudi arabia are there because of *clemency*; they were *not* killed for being raped, but were instead merely imprisoned for being raped.

        is this cult vile, or what?

        • gravenimage says

          Apr 23, 2018 at 8:25 pm

          This is grimly true. If a woman reports a rape and does not have four adult male Muslim witnesses, the *victim* can be accused of having committed “Zina”.

          In Qatar, a Western woman was imprisoned for just this reason:

          “Dutch woman jailed in Qatar after reporting rape convicted of ‘illicit sex'”

          https://www.cnn.com/2016/06/13/middleeast/qatar-dutch-woman-rape-report-jail/index.html

          Even more horrifying, a little 13-year-old gang rape victim was *stoned to death* in Somalia:

          “Amnesty International: “Woman” stoned to death in Somalia was 13-year-old rape victim”

          https://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/11/amnesty-international-woman-stoned-to-death-in-somalia-was-13-year-old-rape-victim

        • mortimer says

          Apr 24, 2018 at 1:35 am

          freeman, thanks. I read the Sharia manual every day. Soddy Barbaria is unlikely to reform its rape culture.

      • mortimer says

        Apr 24, 2018 at 1:33 am

        JB, you are intemperate and no one is helped by that and you do yourself harm.

  2. Niemoller says

    Apr 23, 2018 at 8:34 am

    Converting to Islam in the west is usually indicative of passive aggressive hatred toward either family or society, and often associated with a major misdeed committed by the converter who wishes to rationalize it or cover it up. This is why Islam flourishes in prison. Prison conversion to Christianity involves accepting failure and wanting to turn oneself around with the help of God, Prison conversion to Islam involves denying failure and blaming non-Muslim society for not acknowledging your superiority; Islamoconverts get out of prison with an attitude of hatred and revenge seeking. Rape and terrorism, aka jihad, is the easiest way for uneducated criminal Muslims to attack society.

    • mortimer says

      Apr 24, 2018 at 1:36 am

      Agree with much of Niemoller’s post. I personally believe Islam appeals to those who are ‘into’ sadomasochism. They are fascinated with giving and receiving pain.

  3. boris says

    Apr 23, 2018 at 11:01 am

    Not only women are in danger of being raped or even worse. I myself as a 16 yr old was assaulted in Tunisia while we were on holiday there in the 70’s. I managed to get away from the guy. But google on ‘boy rape in the UAE’ and page after page you read how young boys, often foreign, are assaulted, raped and even killed in de UAE. Just as young kids iin Afghanistan are sold to warlord as ‘bacha bazi’s’ to dance in girls clothes for Afghan men and after used for sexual ‘pleasure’. Boy abuse is another of the many widespread, from Morocco to Pakistan, illnesses in the realm of islam.

    • b.a. freeman says

      Apr 23, 2018 at 4:53 pm

      when every jihadi gets 4 wives, it leaves a lot of males with no possibility of being married. the muslim who is poor and wants to get off must either rape a kuffar or rape a little boy. and when an american soldier in afghanistan tried to stop an afghan official from raping a little boy, he was drummed out of the army. those silly western morals aren’t for the master religion, doncha know…

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 23, 2018 at 8:38 pm

      Boris, I’m horrified to hear this, but not surprised. There is also an epidemic of Muslims in Europe raping boys.

  4. Blurb1000 says

    Apr 23, 2018 at 11:21 am

    “I remain a Muslim and am proud of my Islam.” wtf?

    • b.a. freeman says

      Apr 23, 2018 at 5:46 pm

      we gotta cut her some slack, Blurb; allah is a stupid god who only understands arabic, so if she doesn’t speak arabic, she had never understood a muslim prayer. furthermore, much of the scripture quoted is in arabic, and translated on the fly by the imam. thus, she only knows what her imam(s) have told her. i suspect once she gets a handle on the scriptures, she’ll stop being muslim.

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 23, 2018 at 8:38 pm

      Stockholm syndrome.

  5. Charlie in NY says

    Apr 23, 2018 at 11:49 am

    I disagree with your hypothetical anticipated public explanation that Ramadan will make. Since far too many in France (and elsewhere) have willingly fallen for the nonsensical proposition that “Muslims are the new Jews,” my guess is that Ramadan’s argument will be a simple yet telling soundbite whose purpose is to create a grotesquely false historical equivalency: “I’m the new Dreyfus.”

  6. Muslim2018 says

    Apr 23, 2018 at 1:57 pm

    She was choked and slapped, did she go to the hospital or some victim center so that the evidence could be collected?

    It seems this was unprotected sex so did she take the morning after pill? Did she just completed her period when she was raped?

    If these women were raped then this has nothing to do with Islam and Tariq if guilty had no right to behave in this manner.

    But of course JW loves to exaggerate issues without asking serious questions regarding these women stories. They take these testimony of these women as if it is revelation from God whereas proper investigation and questioning are needed.

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 23, 2018 at 9:09 pm

      Raping a woman because she did’nt wear a Hijab has nothing to do with Islam? Try again–Muslims have the right to rape Infidels–and the “insufficiently Islamic” are considered virtual Kafirs, as “Muslim2018” well knows.

      Does he actually oppose Muslims raping Infidels? If so, then he goes against the model of the “Prophet” Muhammed himself.

      And note that this still holds today–Muslims may rape Infidels. This is “Ask Imam”, which is the most widely-read Islamic site in English:

      http://askimam.org/public/question_detail/17032

      Does “Muslim2018” have a problem with this? How could he?

      Then, there are Muslim clerics who regard *all* women who do not wear Hijab to be fair game to be raped:

      “Australian Muslim leader compares uncovered women to exposed meat”

      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/oct/26/australia.marktran

      Sheik Hilali was quoted as saying: “If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside … without cover, and the cats come to eat it … whose fault is it, the cats’ or the uncovered meat’s? The uncovered meat is the problem. If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab [the headdress worn by some Muslim women], no problem would have occurred.”

      So why would “Muslim2018” take issue with Tariq Ramadan here?

      • Muslim2018 says

        Apr 24, 2018 at 5:06 am

        This is absolute nonsense the idea that simply because a woman doesn’t wear hijab is fair game.

        Since there was no war, no conquest, she is not a slave in a 21st century context then if Tariq raped her it’s zina, since he is married then Islamic law is clear regarding the punishment.

        Sheikh Hilali is wrong, in Islamic law when a man sees a woman who exposes her beauty he is commanded to lower his gaze and guard his modesty.

        Also, during the time of the prophet peace be upon him women danced naked in the kaba, they were not fair game to rape them.

        You lot have a distorted view of Islamic law. Bigotry and hatred has clouded your mind.

        Lastly, there are many evil verses in the Bible as well. You may argue that Christians don’t do those things today, the first reason is Christians do not practice real Christianity anymore. So the same way you all say that majority of Muslims are not practicing Islam like the extremists so too you lot don’t practice the Bible.

  7. gravenimage says

    Apr 23, 2018 at 8:04 pm

    Tariq Ramadan rape accuser says he told her he was raping her “because you don’t wear a hijab”
    ……………………..

    I wish I could say this surprises me, but we’ve seen this before–not wearing a Hijab is immoral, but *rape* is just fine.

    God, I hate Islam.

  8. Westman says

    Apr 23, 2018 at 11:27 pm

    Is this is the Islam version of the movie, “Never On A Sunday”, with Ramadan starring as Homer – according to Ramadan? The methods of attempting to reform the central female character greatly diverge, apparently, from the original movie.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Westman on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.