Not only did Rotherham Council officials do nothing about the Muslim rape gangs for fear of “racism,” but then they “orchestrated a raid” on the whistleblower’s charity “as part of an investigation which has now been slammed by the local government ombudsman.”
What on earth were Rotherham Council officials thinking? What good could they possibly have thought would come from their ignoring criminal activity because it was committed by Muslims, and persecuting those who called attention to it? Did they think their Muslim constituents would be gratified by their solicitude, and stop the criminal activity committed by members of their community as a result? Or were the Council members simply resigned to the idea that soon Britain would be under Sharia rule, such that it would be a good career move for them to have built up a record of appeasement and accommodation?
“Rotherham Council Ordered to Apologise to Whistleblower Who Exposed Grooming Scandal,” by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, April 20, 2018:
Rotherham Council has been ordered to apologise to a whistleblower who helped expose the mass exploitation of underage white girls by mostly Muslim men.
Jayne Senior, who has worked with grooming victims since 1999 and was made a Member of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire (MBE) in 2016 for services to child protection, helped to blow the lid off a long-running grooming gang scandal in the town.
She revealed how council officials, social services, and police — paralysed by fears of racism accusations — failed to act while at least 1,400 girls were abused.
But just months after she received her award and published her memoirs, Broken and Betrayed, the council orchestrated a raid on the charity she runs, Swinton Lock, as part of an investigation which has now been slammed by the local government ombudsman.
The ombudsman has ordered Rotherham Council to apologise to Senior for continuously misleading her about the investigation’s progress, and keeping her in the dark about its details.
“I’m appalled it’s taken so long. It’s crazy how ill-informed [Senior] has been through the process,” commented Sarah Champion, the Member of Parliament for Rotherham.
The left-wing MP was herself forced to resign from Labour’s shadow government after admitting that “Britain has a problem with British Pakistani men raping and exploiting white girls” which the authorities are afraid to confront.
“In the five years I have been an MP I have never come across something like this affecting a constituent, let alone a councillor and a well-known whistleblower,” she added.
“You would think that the council would be trying to do everything in a timely manner. In fact, the opposite has happened.”…
mike9a says
in awkward sharia hypnosis they live in
elee says
Kafirs your daughters and wives are helal for any Muslim
mortimer says
AN APOLOGY IS NOT ENOUGH!
The Rotherham council should be forced to pay BIG DAMAGES for mental suffering and loss of reputation.
A lawsuit should be started to embarrass them and force them to fork out BIG LEGAL DEFENSE MONEY. Other towns will then THINK TWICE before they ABANDON THEIR OWN PEOPLE TO ISLAMIC TERRORISTS!
dsinc says
Way to go mortimer. Big thumbs up.
b.a. freeman says
actually, because they *intended* to allow the rapes to coninue, regardless of what their motivation may have been (fear of being called racist, hard-core leftist wishing to destroy society so that it collapses and the left can seize absolute power, etc.), i would think that there should be a *criminal* investigation, and people should spend *major* time in prison.
not holding my breath; the same old nazis are running UKistan.
b.a. freeman says
actually, because they *intended* to allow the rapes to continue, regardless of what their motivation may have been (fear of being called racist, hard-core leftist wishing to destroy society so that it collapses and the left can seize absolute power, etc.), i would think that there should be a *criminal* investigation, and people should spend *major* time in prison.
not holding my breath; the same old nazis are running UKistan.
Frank Anderson says
Mortimer, again we agree on far more than we disagree. In the course of my research over 25 years ago concerning whistleblowing, I found case after case where wrongful termination or other abuse was allowed by US courts. One horrible example was the case of Comerford v International Harvester from the Supreme Court of Alabama. This was a case decided, I believe, in 1936. Mr. Comerford was fired because his wife refused to have sex with his boss. The Alabama Supreme Court wrote that he could be fired under the law of “fire at will”. What really makes me sick is that approximately 1982, they reaffirmed Comerford in the case of Meredith v. Combustion Engineering Walther division, where an employee joined a suit over the raiding of the pension fund he had paid into for years connected with the sale and purchase of the company. He was fired for exercising the basic Constitutional Rights of association with other plaintiffs and petition of government for the redress of grievances. What is amazing is that this decision was in spite of the 1964 decision New York Times v. Sullivan, a US Supreme Court case overturning an Alabama Supreme Court decision, on the basis that a state court cannot enforce *any* rule of law, whether common (judge made) or statutory, that interferes with Constitutional rights.
What I have written applies only in the US because there is a written Constitution that some would cheerfully shred at the earliest opportunity so we can be “modern” with our “rights” determined day-to-day by the whim of the powers in charge, much as the previous administration flaunted the Constitution whenever it met *his* desires. I found in my research the EU’s legislated relief for whistleblowers to be so paltry as to be utterly meaningless. Suing on a hard to win case, in the face of loser pays everything, including the winner’s attorney fees and all expenses, when the award is a joke is not for people who value their time and resources. Those resources would be better spent getting the crooks out of office and in confinement at hard labor where they belong. Then law-abiding people might see some relief that is worth the effort. Peace be with you.
Raja says
Great comment Mortimer… Worth serious legal remedy and a long-term solution to Jihad
concerned canadian says
I want these people held accountable.
Prove to us this story is or isn’t factual.
What are they hiding ?
Where is the outrage ?!!!
b.a. freeman says
there won’t be any outrage, because it’s not PC. we mustn’t interfere with pervert muhammed’s troops as they rape and pillage. so long as the battle is still going on, the troops are allowed to do whatever they wish to the kaffir of UKistan.
Garfield says
Any hideous act Muslims do, leftists say “it’s their culture” and grovel and bow to them. Wtf.
…..It’s almost as if…leftists LIKE perversion, rape, thuggery, disrespect…..
Hmmmm….
Jayell says
Yes, but rape and hideous systematic abuse of young females – or anyone – has never been part of British culture. These savages call themselves “British’ to get their hands on the benefits, but they don’t look, sound or act ‘British’, and appear to be quite incapable of doing so.
melek-ric says
This situation (and the increasing incidence of others like it) bring to mind the theory postulated by historian Ian Kershaw and others, called “Working Towards the Führer”, to explain the phenomena that led to Nazi-ism’s rapid encompassing all of German society after 1933. There are many similarities in today’s hard-Left government and social services hierarchies. Rather than paraphrase, I’ll quote Kershaw:
“Everyone with opportunity to observe it knows that the Führer can only with great difficulty order from above everything that he intends to carry out sooner or later. On the contrary, until now everyone has best worked in his place in the new Germany if, so to speak, he works towards the Führer.
This was the central idea of a speech made by Werner Willikens, State Secretary in the Prussian Agriculture Ministry. These comments, made in a routine speech, hold a key to how the Third Reich operated. Hitler’s personalized form of rule invited radical initiatives from below and offered such initiatives backing, so long as they were in line with his broadly defined goals. This promoted ferocious competition at all levels of the regime, among competing agencies, and among individuals within those agencies. In the Darwinist jungle of the Third Reich, the way to power and advancement was through anticipating the ‘Führer will’, and, without waiting for directives, taking initiatives to promote what were presumed to be Hitler’s aims and wishes.”
If you substitute “social justice” for “Hitler’s personalized form of rule”, the parallels start to appear.
Felix Quigley says
“In the Darwinist jungle of the Third Reich, the way to power and advancement was through anticipating the ‘Führer will’, and, without waiting for directives, taking initiatives to promote what were presumed to be Hitler’s aims and wishes.” ”
The Nazi regime was Fascism. It had nothing to do with the work of Charles Darwin on evolution.
Or is your dropping of the name of Darwin just an accident. If so withdraw it please.
melek-ric says
Felix,
I’m QUOTING another author, the historian Ian Kershaw. Apparently you didn’t notice the quotation marks bracketing the quote, or my statement that I was quoting him. Please make an effort to actually read what people write before launching silly attacks on them.
Felix Quigley says
And Kershaw is wrong. And you quoted him. What is your problem?
melek-ric says
I ‘m not the one with the problem here…
b.a. freeman says
Felix, ian kershaw was no doubt using “darwinist” to indicate a dog-eat-dog world, in which the “strong,” meaning those who anticipated the leader’s will the fastest and with the greatest brutality, were the ones who got ahead. i don’t think that he was equating darwin with hitler or nazism, or even associating it with them. he used it in a literary sense, as a sort of shorthand, if U will, to add a flavor of what the common man understands darwin to be all about (and whether or not that “understanding” is correct). a lot of such literary shorthand has been published over the years. please, let’s not get distracted by throwing rocks at one another; i think most of us here hate nazism and islam both.
Felix Quigley says
It really is not a distraction. I have read that book and I disagree with his explanation of Fascism. He does not. He is talking in this part about how Hitler was (in my words here) a nonentity and he allowed his henchmen and women to make all the decisions. They were then taking decisions anticipating what the “Great leader” would want. What a set up! Stalin ran something a little similar. So did Mussolini. It is a feature of Fascism but it is a minor feature. To understand what is Fascism, which is very necessary, people today have to turn to Marxism, as Marx and Engels developed their thought, to Lenin, but above all to Leon Trotsky. He is the one person then or since who explained Fascism. And in much detail on Mussolini, Hitler, Franco and on Fascism in France as well. Kershaw never got close.
What is described here is a very minor detail in the overall issue of Fascism.
Britain today is along with many countries on the verge of Fascism. But not yet. It is still possible to carry out political activity.
But there is no leadership which can fight against these trends. This is because the right like Spencer keep bitching about Marx. While so called lefts like Corbyn the “labourist” attack Tommy Robinson. There is a vacuum of leadership. THAT is the problem.
Meanwhile this is where this attack on Darwin comes in. It IS an attack whatever way you cut it.
But Darwin was a great English scientist devoting his whole life to science, the greatest English light in the scientific world, and also he was therefore a great Englishman. I respect England and that is why I fight against any attack on Darwin or on English science in general.
This is also where non stop immigration, all immigration but especially this savage culture of Islam, comes in. These savages are demeaning English history. But that is made easy for them by people who demean Charles Darwin. The socialist revolution is needed and its first task must be to clear Islam out of the country. I stand on that platform.
gravenimage says
Agreed, b.a. freeman. Kershaw was using “darwinist” in the popular sense more than as an in-depth anaysis of Darwin’s theories. This is not demeaning Charles Darwin or his work.
And I don’t believe that Kersaw was intending to give Hitler any kind of pass by noting that many Germans carried out the Führer’s aims.
And I see that Felix Quigley is once again demanding that we replace the bloody threat of Islam with the bloody threat of Communism.
Sorry–many of us here oppose *all* totalitarian nightmares.
TheOldOligarch says
There is also the fact that the Nazi’s conception of race and the place of the Germanic peoples on the evolutionary totem pole was heavily influenced by Darwinism. It wasn’t even just the Nazis either. The earlier genocide that Germany carried out against the Herero people in Africa was predicated on much the same set of beliefs: the Germanic race was stronger and more highly evolved than rest of the vermin infesting the planet and it was it’s manifest destiny to expunge all competitors and become the only/dominant race of man.
gravenimage says
Not really. Americans and Britons largely accepted the concept of evolution and they never did anything like this.
Axolotl says
Felix Quigley. Why nit-pick? In this context ‘Darwinist’ is appropriate – it’s meaning is bloody obvious to all. melek-ric makes a good point about the growth and danger of the social justice movement. Read it.
This really isn’t the place for literary and grammar police.
jayell says
The chickens are coming home to roost and the heads will start rolling.
b.a. freeman says
jayell, U live in the UK, do U not? if so, i think U probably have a better idea than most whether the nazis who run the government will actually enforce the law. do U think that the nazis will let them get away with it?
Jayell says
The rot has got into the woodwork here, i.e., the unholy alliance of a bent establishment sucking up to Middle East oil money, anti-British PC lefties and the muslim immigrants who are riding on the back of all this and pushing their luck way beyond the line, backed by the likes of Saudi Arabia and Qatar, etc. Basically, the group and all their chums who are currently managing the house have brought their ugly great pet elephant with a hijab into the living room without anyone else’s agreement, expecting the rest of the residents to put up with all the mess. We need new management but there’s a problem with legally evicting this present lot. Any ideas?
Anne Smith says
Most of the Councillors are probably Muslims in any case.
Those employed by the Council have undergone the Common Purpose training courses and are PC to their last molecule and would never accuse anyone from an ethnic minority of anything.
As for Sarah Champion – she is no saint, she has made herself a nice lot of money out of it all by joining in a libel case against the brave MEP Jane Collins who spoke out against the MPs for Rotherham, claiming they could not have been totally ignorant of what was going on. For her pains they sued her and Champion who was not an MEP at the time joined in afterwards.
Quite amazingly Ms Collins was found guilty of libel and has had to pay massive damages. Champion now stands to receive a large (thousands) lump sum of money while the brave Ms Collins has been made bankrupt.
Quite enough to put anyone off from fighting the cause wouldn’t you think?.
Felix Quigley says
Jayell if you are a proud English person then why do you not join me in my defence of that great English scientist Charles Darwin. Nor is Darwin the only scientist to be honoured either. Darwin came at the end of a long series of great achievements by English people in science.
Yet I have seen this great English man attacked in comments on this very posting on Jihadwatch and there is not a murmur from you.
If the English are not proud of their real achievements, or as bad are ignorant of them, then that is a big part of the problem.
A good example is the following…
“TheOldOligarch says
Apr 20, 2018 at 7:18 pm
There is also the fact that the Nazi’s conception of race and the place of the Germanic peoples on the evolutionary totem pole was heavily influenced by Darwinism. It wasn’t even just the Nazis either. The earlier genocide that Germany carried out against the Herero people in Africa was predicated on much the same set of beliefs: the Germanic race was stronger and more highly evolved than rest of the vermin infesting the planet and it was it’s manifest destiny to expunge all competitors and become the only/dominant race of man.”
Here is a horrific attack on the achievements of Charles Darwin. The above writer is actually saying that Fascism was informed by the work of Charles Darwin.
That in itself is also a head on attack on England. Yet it goes by without a murmur of opposition here on Jihadwatch.
And you purport to be fighters against the Jihad. The Jihadists lick their lips at such a put down of English culture and achievements. They see the English themselves either ignorant or engaged in put downs of their own culture.
mach37 says
How do the town officials in the UK justify allowing established laws to be broken rather than be accused of of racism? Are the UK anti-racism laws actually stronger and more enforceable than laws against physical violence?
Exactly who are the officials who have cowed the Town Council into failing to act against established laws? Why are the once great people of the UK allowing Muslim intruders to be elected to municipal offices? Surely the Anglo natives outnumber the Muslims; it baffles me that ANY Muslim manages to be elected to office, unless there is election fraud taking place.
Felix Quigley says
You are reinforcing the points I made above. The attack made on this site by commenters on Charles Darwin, the achievements of that great man, one even saying clearly and brazenly that Darwin informed the Nazis, is the answer to you.
The British people, especially the English people, are being taught to disrespect their own peopler and their great history.
I am Irish and we have suffered under British Imperialism. But there is another side and here I see one of its greatest men being attacked in such a disgusting manner.
And this on a website which is claiming to be fighting against Islam.
The Jihad lick their lips at such attacks. They come into UK in order to conquer but they are finding that the work of conquering is being done for them by ignorant commenters on Jihadwatch.
As in claiming that your great English scientist Charles Darwin informed the Nazi vermin.
Bobby says
Mach37…The government decree it,universities and schools teach and promote it.The media spread it and the police enforce it willingly.The councils will evict people who complain.They`ve entangled it with their eternal disdain for us in the lower orders.
IanB says
Common Purpose in action.
Felix Quigley says
Exactly Ian it is indeed that. You have people who are claiming to be against Islamic invasion and conquest laying the ground for them by viciously attack great, great patriots of England like Charles Darwin. You could not make this up!
IanB says
Darwin discovered the truth of life. Deprecation of his name will not destroy that truth however much that might disappoint Creationists.
This Darwin / Nazi issue is a pointless distraction in a discussion of the most appalling scandal in British history.
Felix Quigley says
“Darwin discovered the truth of life”
Exactly…the truth of life, no less. And he was English.
That is the central and key point here. The English have got to and have reason to be proud of their heritage, and if they are proud of their heritage then it automatically follows that the English will rid their land of Islam full stop. Automatically. As night follows day.
Raja says
Felix,
Charles Darwin’s “works” generated lots of controversies. Here are some clippings:
Charles Darwin, the. “father” of modern evolutionism, argued that the “Caucasian races” are superior, and from this concept, Adolf Hitler developed his notion
Charles Darwin, who started out in training to be an Anglican minister, ended up rejecting Christianity the more he believed in evolution. … understood that the world he was observing was not the world as God originally made it, but one which was now suffering the effects of sin, the Curse and the Flood.
At no time in the history of the modern evolutionary movement (i.e., since the publication of Charles Darwin’s book, The Origin of Species, in 1859), has the world of evolutionary thought been in such a state of utter chaos. Theories hoary with aged respect are now under assault by a new breed of scientists, who can no …
The average “layman” who subscribes to the theory of evolution champions Charles Darwin as the great luminary of this materialistic philosophical system. What many do not realize, however, is that not all scientists, even in the evolutionary community, bow before the British naturalist.
My comment:
The theories have remained theories. There are thousands of other Englishmen including Scots, Irish who made the UK a world power and in spite of Darwinism. Biblical prophecy worth noting:
For from the rising of the sun even to its setting, My name will be great among the nations, and in every place incense is going to be offered to My name, and a grain offering that is pure; for My name will be great among the nations,” says the LORD of hosts.
The religious systems of UK though erratic helped people with a God-centered culture and there was a culture of uniqueness, discipline, hard work, justice for all and so on.. Come the Left, they have lost all the semblance of Sanity. God calls the atheists fools and they are defined as :
For a fool speaks nonsense, And his heart inclines toward wickedness: To practice ungodliness and to speak error against the LORD, To keep the hungry person unsatisfied And to withhold drink from the thirsty. Isaiah 32:6
Do you want these people to run your government?
The Islamic mixture of so-called religion with politics is a curse on this planet, by the same breadth, I would say that you cannot eliminate God.
kouldb says
Imbeciles by the score, in the failing state of Sharia Britain.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Apologize?! They should all have been JAILED.
Oh, wait – I meant “apologise” and “GAOLED!”
gravenimage says
UK: Rotherham Council ordered to apologize to whistleblower they persecuted for exposing Muslim rape gangs
…………………..
Well, this is something. But that it ever happened in the first place is just sickening.