This is a clear indication of what I have long contended, that charges of “Islamophobia” are used to shut down honest discussion of the ideological roots of Islamic jihad terrorism, with the result being that the global jihad is able to advance unopposed and unimpeded.
“JNU To Start A Study On ‘Islamic Terrorism’. Here’s Why Teachers Think It’s Problematic,” by TK Sreeraj, inUth.com, May 20, 2018:
A proposed study on ‘Islamic terrorism’ has sparked a new controversy in Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) with many faculty members and teachers calling it an attempt to fuel Islamophobia. The university’s Academic Council on Friday passed a proposal to set up a Centre for National Security Studies, under which there would be a possibly be a course, themed on “Islamic terrorism”. Despite strong criticism from a few council members, who pointed out that the proposal was communal in nature as terrorism shouldn’t be linked to any religion.
According to a PTI report, a draft of the proposal was prepared by a four-member committee headed by Ajay Kumar Dubey, a professor of the Centre for African Studies. Initially, only M.Phil and PhD students will be accepted and focus would be majorly on research. The proposed MA programme will probably commence after five years.
Apart from Islamic terrorism, the Centre for National Security Studies will also have courses on the military modernisation of China and Pakistan, defence economics, nuclear proliferation and data arms control and disarmament, civil-military relations, naxalism and other aspects.
InUth spoke to Dr Sudhir K. Suthar, an office-bearer of the JNU Teachers Association (JNUTA) who was part of the council meeting. “A few members objected to the usage of the word ‘Islamic terrorism’ and suggested it should be changed to terrorism. JNUTA, which represents the entire teaching fraternity of the university, has registered its objections with the Committee,” he said….
Krishna says
Jawarlal nehru University is hard leftist University
Cicero says
Yes, it is well known for being pro-Islam and anti Hindu. So fancy that it is now being criticised for being Islamophobic!
How ironic!!!!!
J D S says
Ghandi’s ashes are crying out from the depths.
gravenimage says
Unfortunately, Gandhi was often quite a dhimmi.
Berengaria says
I always thought that India carved out a Country for Foul Muslims, called Pakistan.
Yet India is still inundated with Muslim TERRORISTS.
Muslims Don’t Want a Country of their own, they want YOUR COUNTRY.
The Leftish Fools in India are just like all other Leftish Fools, Worldwide, They want to Love & Understand the Evil Muslim Mind.
The Muslims are out to destroy, then take over all Countries, & that includes the Leftish Fools who Love Em!
Infidel says
U have PERFECTLY understood the situation in India..Thank a lot!!
Mirit says
Berengaria,
It is exactly the same in Israel. Jordan was carved out of the British Mandate in Palestine. Israel was supposed to be Jewish and Jordan – Arab Muslim. But as you said – they want YOUR country. They want to Islamize Israel. And they won’t rest until they do.
J D S says
I think America is full up and running over. We don’t need anymore people in America we are full..hardly able to feed and work what we have now.
I have no problem with diversity in races, cultures, religions etc. But when these try to force their culture or religion on me I will fight, alongside many more, to defend my right to believe and say that my right is important to me and no one will ever FORCE me to bend to their way and will defend that with the last drop of blood in my body.
peter says
Very well said . Exactly my sentiments .
esther says
fret not, Hindu Indians—–Armenians are not allowed to complain either.
If muslims do not like the word “TERRORISM” —-how about renaming
the course——“THE GLORIES OF THE AGE OF ISLAMIC CONQUEST—
and its continuation into the 21st CENTURY”
Garfield says
Frightening. The corruption of and the censoring of language needed to accurately describe Islamic hate is such a horrendously insidious problem.
Jaladhi says
This study will be useless because the lefty students and profs will come out with the conclusion – there is no Islamic terrorism. It’s the right wing Hindus who are terrorists just like the stupid US media’s assertion about Islamic terrorism which states that right wing fanatics in US are bigger terrorists than Islamic terrorists. You see there is no space left for the truth when discussing Islam and Muslims who are “peaceful” despite evidence to the contrary!!
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Dirty Hindu barbarians, fascist evil zionists and common ideology of hatred towards muslims because wicked and unjust satan god (holy spirit) in durga goddess and Dharma idols, yahweh and his wife Ashera hero gods inspired their belief systems. It is savage mad devil Trump who First adopted that lie of equating terrorism with Islam promoted by mr spencer and CO and now Hindu barbarian rascals are copying them to justify genocide killings of muslims in India. Idiots !!
Krishna says
You’re ignorant about your religion
Sharyati says
Krishna you are being too soft on him. He is not. He is just using Taqiyya to feel fake outrage that is all.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Sharyati, durga goddess Idol is weaker than spiderhouse. I Will send prayers from the Quran to get the Satan in durga goddess Idol running and track him down so that no more magic Will Come out of It. I can even push that Idol and nothing Will happene as prophet muhammad pulled down the chief Idol Hubal of pagan meccan pagans together with 360 other idols and mecca was freed from idolatry upto today.
Sharyati says
Wow Wow!!! You seem to know Durga even better than all of us who have worshipped her life long!!! Will prefere Durga any day over a slave owning, caravan raiding, man slaughtering, daughter in law screwing prophet(May piss be upon him) and his partner in crime Allah. JAI MAA DURGA KI
Sharyati says
Wow stinking Islamic pig Ibrahim, i was bored to death by the absence of your rant on Durga and Dharma!!I You Idiot asshole, read Will Durrants book on how Islamic jihad destroyed India and demolished temples, stole the wealth and rapped Hindu women.After 1200 years and still on going Jihad on the Indian sub continent, if anything at all, we have learnt the following on Islamic appeasement in particular and minority appeasement in general
1. Any sect of Islam is a terrorist group, yes including Sufis and will not hesitate to kill and exterminate the Kafir and his way off life. I do not believe in the lie that is being spread in India that Sufis were Ghazal singing monks.
2. Each Islamic sect considers other Islamic sects to be munafique or Takfiri. Like for example how the Sunnis and Shias in Pakistan treat the Ahamadiyas and how the Indian Sunni Wakf board excludes and despises Shiites.
3. “Secularism” means in India, minority ass licking with top priority given to licking Islamic asses. That is why you see Shameless hypocritic “Sickular” Indian politicians falling head over heals to attend Iftar parties during Ramzan donning skull caps or wearing rags on their heads. All in all shameless rascals who would not mind to sell their mothers as sex slaves if they can get the Muslim vote block to vote for them.
4. As an extension to the previous point the same politicians ban Hindu festivals like holi and deepavali saying they are noisy and polluting and arrest Hindus who worship snakes by offering eggs though they never in actuality went near the snake. But these are considered acts of animal cruelty. But on Bakrid and Ramzan millions of cows, goats camels etc are slaughtered using halal methods and certain areas were Muslims are in a majority one cannot enter the area for weeks on till the blood and gore on the streets are cleared. During those festivals people living in the vicinity of those areas report that the were animals shrieking and crying out of pain the whole night and the next day, while the young Muslim street Arabs pelt stones at already dying animals, poke them with sticks and when the animal howls further in their pain they go into extreme raptures of joy.
5. Hindu temple lands being encroached by Muslims(Equally this is done by Christians too and is no way different from what the Muslims do) illegally and constructing wayside shops or shacks, slowly but surely appropriating the lands by getting the land transferred to their names by misusing the already genuflecting local authorities and politicians to issue fake documents and erase existing records.
So all in all DIP Ibrahmim, i would advice you to shut the eff up before you talk without knowing whats happening in here. I know all the above points will be too much for your impervious head, that believes that fresh water and salt water cannot mix because the Quran said so. But as is said i attempted to throw a stone at the mango tree hoping that a fruit will fall, but looks like in your case only the stone will fall down without dislodging a fruit.
Hector Archytas says
Ibrahim is just asking politely for our name, adress and throat so as he can apply the verse 8:12 on us to secure the paradice promised by his idol.
Infidel says
Maaderchod Ibrahim….
Infidel says
MC Ibrahim..bs-dk
peter says
Your friends O bama and your kind have fooled milions of people in the world .No more . You wormin
J D S says
Ibrahim…go home!..I think I hear your mother calling you.
WESTPAC Spy says
I love how ibrahim falls all over himself in his haste to prove how everyone who has studied Islam and recognizes the ideology’s true face and therefore despises it is 100% correct.
gravenimage says
Wow! Talk about projection!
Ren says
To study “islamic terrorism” is to better fight it. That is a good thing.
TKF says
Teaching about Islamic terrorism does NOT fuel Islamophobia. Islamic terrorism fuels Islamophobia.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Jay Boo, your mithraist christianity cannot compet with Islam because mithraist christianity is paganic inspired by the Satan you Call holy spirit. That is why mithraist christians resort to insults,not rational debate.How and when jesus became Godman and begotten son of God ?
Jayell says
Well done, Mr. Muhammed, you left the word ‘mithrast’ out from your first string of insults further back, but you’ve managed to get it in here, I notice. Well done. What a shame that your reply to Jay Boo is completely irrelevant to both Jay Boo’s post and subject of this thread, but you certainly excel at novel twists of logic and introducing new facts to your audience. For example, you mentioned Yahweh’s wife again in your previous post, but you haven’t yet explained how you came to hear about his wedding and no one else has. Likewise, the global news media must have been keeping very quiet the terrible genocide of muslims in India, so perhaps you ought to tell the world about it, with accurate details of the thousands (if not millions) who must have suffered at the hands of all the evil, rampaging Hindus. And this certainly come as a double blow to all good muslims who must now feel that their reputation as the past masters of rampaging mass slaughtet is now under threat.
aguysomewhere says
Ibrahim you keep coming here, you seem to need to go where you’re not wanted.
Your false prophet muhammad himself said that he had to remove some verses from islam because the devil fooled him, well with all the intolerant and violent verses left in the quran and hadiths I think we can say without the shadow of doubt that the devil fooled him 100 times more than he knew. Islam is full of devilish stuff and if you muslims would take your heads out of your asses you would see the obvious.
To make matters worse muhammad was mentally insane. He even tried to commit suicide. His own uncle wouldn’t let him marry his daughter, a clear sign that something wasn’t right with him. He wasn’t quite up to the standard. Muhammads luck only changed once he married well and had access to wealth and connections that would help to further his interests.
Muhammad was a inciter to hatred and violence of other religions. He was a rapist, murderer, mass murderer and genocidist. He enslaved people. He committed adultery. He murdered an old man who gossiped about him.
Muhammad’s own deeds prove he was man worthy of detest not adoration.
Islam is built on a pack of lies, violence and devilish influence.
Ray Jarman says
Ibrahim, FYI, I am tired of your relentless use of describing the Holy Spirit as satin inspired. One of my atheist friends often remarks that what we Christians call the Holy Spirit can be interpreted as the conscience as Philip Wily describes in his “Essay on Morals.” Maybe in you perverted cult, when one’s inner self tells him that something is immoral and should not acted upon, that is inspired by satin but in Christianity and ever other religions as well as atheists I have ever studied, never have I read where one’s ability to differentiate between good and evil is sinful.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Ray Jarman, If an entity you Call holy spirit always guides mithraist christians to be of good behavior and guards them against evil temptations, why mithraist christians have been committing the worst atrocities throughout human history like genocidal killings during crusade wars, in spain, genocidal killings by mithraist christian Nazis, transatlantic slave trade, colonisation or neocolonisation and deprivations of other nations, and they are the most morally bankrupt having indiscriminate sex líke beasts and mithraist churchmen having anus and vaginal sex with Kids under their care ?
WESTPAC Spy says
Are you really a Muslim? Because you actually come across as a satire of a Muslim. You make things so easy. You complain about colonization? When are you going to give North Africa, Persia and Constantinople back to their rightful owners? The Transatlantic slave trade lasted 400 years. And it was mostly Christians who put an end to it.
The Islamic slave trade lasted 1400 years. And there was no way that Islam would have prompted anyone to stop it. That would have been an insult to Muhammad, who owned and had sex with his slaves. Muhammad is the “perfect man,” so if he bought and sold slaves (and he bought far more than he sold, and he didn’t believe in emancipation) Muslims aren’t allowed to criticize the practice. As is the same with pedophilia. We, the Christian West had to force the Islamic world to end slavery. Saudi Arabia made it illegal in 1960, and Mauritania banned it in 1980. But while technically illegal it’s still widely practiced.
Surah 4:24
“And [also prohibited to you are all] married women except those your right hands possess. [This is] the decree of Allah upon you. And lawful to you are [all others] beyond these, [provided] that you seek them [in marriage] with [gifts from] your property, desiring chastity, not unlawful sexual intercourse. So for whatever you enjoy [of marriage] from them, give them their due compensation as an obligation. And there is no blame upon you for what you mutually agree to beyond the obligation. Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Wise.”
It’s hilarious that you say Christians are “morally bankrupt” and have “indiscriminate sex.” Your “holy Quran” not only says you can have sex with slaves, your Allah gives his blessing to adultery.
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3149/egypt-sex-slave-marriage
“Egypt’s “first sex-slave marriage” took place mere days after the Muslim Brotherhood’s Muhammad Morsi was made president.
Last Monday, on the Egyptian TV show Al Haqiqa (“the Truth”), journalist Wael al-Ibrashi showed a video-clip of a man, Abd al-Rauf Awn, “marrying” his slave. Before making the woman, who has a non-Egyptian accent, repeat after him the Koran’s Surat al-Ikhlas, instead of saying the usual “I marry myself to you,” the woman said “I enslave myself to you,” kissing him in front of an applauding audience.
Then, even though she was wearing a hijab, her owner-husband declared that she is forbidden from such trappings and commanded her to be stripped of them, so as “not to break Allah’s laws.” She took her veil and abaya off, revealing, by Muslim standards, a seductive red dress (all the other women present were veiled). The man claps for her and the video-clip (which can be seen here) ends…”
Had the Muslim Brotherhood remained in power, they would have made slavery legal again.
And sex slaves aren’t allowed to be veiled. That’s only lawful for Muslim women. Not like there’s much difference between a wife and a slave under Islam. Surah 2:223 says:
“Your wives are a place of sowing of seed for you, so come to your place of cultivation however you wish and put forth [righteousness] for yourselves. And fear Allah and know that you will meet Him. And give good tidings to the believers.”
A wife has no more right to refuse to have sex with her husband on demand than a farmer’s field has even the ability to say no to the farmer when and how he wants to plow it. As Muhammad said, if a husband demands sex from his wife she must surrender herself to him even if she’s riding on the back of a camel.
“…The man, Abd al-Rauf Awn, who identified himself as an Islamic scholar who studied at Al Azhar and an expert at Islamic jurisprudence, then appeared on the show, giving several Islamic explanations to justify his marriage, from Islam’s prophet Muhammad’s “sunna,” or practice, of “marrying” enslaved captive women, to Koran 4:3, which declares: “Marry such women as seem good to you, two and three and four… or what your right hands possess.”
Though the term malk al-yamin literally means “that which is owned by your right hand,” for all practical purposes, and to avoid euphemisms, according to Islamic doctrine and history, she is simply a sex-slave. Linguistic evidence even suggests that she is seen not as a human but as a possession.
Even stripping the sex-slave of her hijab, the way Awn did, has precedent. According to Islamic jurisprudence, whereas the free (Muslim) woman is mandated to wear a hijab, sex-slaves are mandated only to be covered from the navel to the knees—with everything else exposed. Awn even explained how Caliph Omar, one of the first “righteous caliphs,” would strip sex-slaves of their garments, whenever he saw them overly dressed in the marketplace…”
If you really are a Muslim, you don’t strike me as the sharpest scimitar in the arsenal. But you are a funny guy. Thanks for making it easy for us to expose your filthy creed for what it is.
gravenimage says
Pious Muslims are pretty much caricatures…
peter says
Learn to spell before you can comment on religion.
Clive Stephen Delmonte says
Spot on, Robert !
Chand says
“……………………………civil-military relations, naxalism and other aspects.”
Yes, there are other aspects.
India is still a backward, feudal land with heaps of corruption and widespread discrimination and oppression. The lower castes, minorities and aboriginal tribes face severe lack of opportunities. Then there are problems of secessionist movement in the North east and Kashmir. Kashmiri separatism has been hijacked by Islamic jihadism due to the infiltration of jihadi groups based in Pakistan and the heavy handedness of the Indian Army there who fear losing that area to Pakistan. The separatist movement has now turned into a full fledged mass rebellion there.
Many Muslims in India live in abject conditions which is a ripe ground for Jihadi infiltration. Many non Muslims too face poverty and some have turned to other extremist movements, like ‘naxalism’ wihich is Maoist Communism.
So ‘Islamic terrorism’ in India has to be studied within a context and is many layered and complex, like everything else. And it cannot be studied in isolation from the prevailing socio-economic-political conditions there as it will appear ‘Islamophobic’.
Sharyati says
Well Chand you are welcome to go to any of the Islamic nations if you find India corrupt, discriminating, oppressing minorities etc. May be Pakistan for instance where minorities are being slowly cleansed? And people like Asia Bibi are sentenced to death for alleged blasphemy? Or better Bangladesh where they are cleansing Hindus.
“So ‘Islamic terrorism’ in India has to be studied within a context and is many layered and complex, like everything else. And it cannot be studied in isolation from the prevailing socio-economic-political conditions there as it will appear ‘Islamophobic’.”
Islamophobic? So Kashmiri Hindus were driven out of the Kashmir their ancestral home lands even before Islam was ever conceived off. They created terrorist outfits? Did not see you speak out against cleansing of Hindus from the Kashmir valley? Many layered and multiple? Do not flatter yourself too much. Right from the destruction and loot of the Somnath temple till now, Islamic terrorism has only one motive, to make all of the earth “Daru-Ul-Islam”. Simple theological motive. No complexity there. And in the process Kafirs are either to be converted or killed.
Classic leftie aren’t you?(Yeah i know you are not a member of any of the murderous communist parties).
peter says
Mr.Chand does not seem to understand the big difference in violence in Islam as opposed to any other civilzed religion .Violence is forbidden in all religions except in Islam whose prophet was a role model to follow for all muslims who ruled by terror and sword .He was the most evil monster in the history of the world and naturally his followers who follow him blindly are driven in to the path of destruction and hatred in the name of Islam.
gravenimage says
What tripe from Chand. Muslims do not become Jihadists due to poverty–in that case, why aren’t there Hindus, Sikhs, and Christians becoming Jihadists?
Besides, India has made great strides in equality and standards of living just during my lifetime. If Muslims were concerned about this they would be working for education and opportunity, not slaughtering unbelievers.
sidney penny says
“InUth spoke to Dr Sudhir K. Suthar, an office-bearer of the JNU Teachers Association (JNUTA) who was part of the council meeting. “A few members objected to the usage of the word ‘Islamic terrorism’ and suggested it should be changed to terrorism. JNUTA, which represents the entire teaching fraternity of the university, has registered its objections with the Committee,” he said….”
Yes, Dr Sudhir K. Suthar some of your members know that Catholic terrorism is a big problem in India.
maybe they were thinking of Sri Lanka’s Tamil Tigers? Did you tell them that Tamil Tigers are no longer operating?
Sharyati says
These guys are Anti nationals and want to break India to pieces by the their own words. Actually the govt of india should stop funding the JNU a breeding ground for Naxals, Jihadis and anti nationals of all hues. I am not sure why the Indian government is still funding this necrotic institute!!
Johm says
There is no such thing as islamaphobia ! If you do not know how to behave you are a terrorist !
FYI says
Studying islamic terrorism?
Well, you can start with THIS:-
“I have been made victorious through TERROR”
muhammed
bukhari4:52:220
Studying the koran?
Well, you can start with THIS:-
“I have fabricated things AGAINST GOD and have imputed to him WORDS he has NOT SPOKEN”
al tabari 6:111
Words God has not spoken:that would be the commandment-of-God violating koran..
Peter says
Given that Hindus have suffered the most (even more than black Africans) at the hands of Muslims since “first contact,” at least in terms of the estimated numbers killed and murdered, “Islamic terrorism” is the wrong subject worthy of study. Rather, it should be the Ideological Foundations of Islamic Hatred of Hindus (and Buddhists, Sikhs, Parsis, Jains, tribal religions, Christians, Jews, etc….).
Infidel says
I LOVED UR USAGE OF “FIRST CONTACT”… It suits the context PERFECTLY.. because Islam is ALIEN & HOSTILE to all creeds in this world..
Granddaddy says
Good for the JNU. They’re calling it what it is. Let us hope they don’t back down.
David says
Yup!
Chand says
Sharyati I am any kind of opression including against Kashmiri Hindu Pandits. But raking up ancient history like the Zomnath temple dececration a thousand years ago is plain garbage. It is just plain hatred when both Muslims and Hindus suffer from India’s poverty and corruption. Who cares whether I am labelled a leftie by likes of you.
Chand says
i am against any
Chand says
like the Somnath temple
WESTPAC Spy says
Chand, the canard that Muslims turn to terrorism because of poverty, a lack of education, lack of opportunity, etc., is a leftist argument. Marxist, really, because Marxists and other leftists simply refuse to believe that Muslims become terrorists for any other reason than pure materialism. So calling you a leftist is accurate, not matter what your other views may be.
It’s an argument that also has been long discredited. It is, in fact, their religion. Osama bin Laden was the billionaire playboy son of a billionaire construction magnate. His sidekick Ayman al-Zawahiri is a medical doctor, the son of another medical doctor, pharmacist, and university professor. His mother was also from a wealthy family. Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has a PhD in Islamic theology. “Jihadi John,” Muhammad Jassim Abdulkarim Olayan al-Dhafiri, was raised in a wealthy section of greater London. He studied information systems with a business management degree at the University of Westminster, graduating in only three years, and was working as a salesman for an IT company in Kuwait when he decided to chuck it all and wage jihad.
So it’s just nonsense to claim what you claim. Islam is unique among all religions in that, according to a joint study by the German interior ministry and the Institute for Criminology Research of Lower Saxony that involved 45000 14-16 year-olds of all faiths in 61 cities across Germany between 2007 and 2008, young Muslims become more prone to violence the more they study their religion and the more devout they become. Naturally the study in Frau Merkel’s Germany didn’t dare to conclude that there is something about Islam that turns people violent.
No, perish the thought. No politician dares to say that there’s something uniquely violent about Islam. Things have gotten so ridiculous that on the campaign trail Bernie Sanders claimed that “all the world’s great religions teach the golden rule,” and one politician in Utah said that Muhammad commanded Muslims to love all people! You can read the Quran and the ahadith until your eyes pop out of your skull and you won’t find any such commandments in the core Islamic texts. Or even the peripheral Islamic texts.
So they used pretzel logic to come to the conclusion that the problem is the WAY that Islam is taught. Not WHAT is being taught. They concluded that the problem with Islam are the Imams, usually foreign born, invariably Saudi-funded, who don’t speak German and have no desire to learn the language or integrate into society. We have enough evidence to know for a fact that there is no way to teach a peaceful Islam no matter who the Imam is or where he’s from. As long as they’re preaching from the Quran the violence is baked in the cake. For instance, in 2006 Iranian-American Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar drove a rented SUV through a courtyard at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, attempting to kill as many people as possible. Was he “radicalized” by one of those Imams? No, he was quit clear that he was inspired to attempt murder simply by studying the Quran.
All it takes is faith in Allah and that book. That is enough to turn young Muslim men violent. No Saudi-funded wahabbist Imams required.
Sharyati says
No it is not a 1000 year issue. Jihad is still alive and kicking in India. Only thing that does not happen now is the piling of Hindu heads into a mountain to prove that one is a Ghazi(Like the scoundrel Akbar did) or the raping of women en-mass. I know how it is, coming from a village in Tamil-Nadu. I have seen how a once Hindu area, after Muslims became a majority, the nearby ancient temple festivals were stopped and how a once thriving micro economy with artisans, flower vendors(Here Muslims made the bulk), farmers etc that was based on the temple, turned into naught and how those people were driven away from the area (They refused to convert) after forcing them to sell their property at dirt cheap prices. Not to say how dirty and ghettoized the place has become. Now the place is always seeing clashes murders etc. I have seen this first hand an i know this.
This is an example of a micro version of what happens when Muslims become a majority in an area. This is happening in Malapuram in Kerala and at many place all over India. As for the poverty Muslims suffers, do not tell me there are no opportunities for them. They are funded by the center and state governments. You have minority institutions, reservation quotas in government jobs etc etc. But Muslims do not want to those opportunities and improve. They tend to ghettoize, send their kids to Madrasas even though the local government school offers compulsory free education till class 8. They oppose vaccinations for polio because some effing mullah would have said that Allah is not happy if you vaccinate your child. Polio is almost non-existent in India and only from these areas that the few existing cases of polio are reported. See the nipah virus outbreak report. It comes from Malapuram in Kerala. Also it was Muslim men who opposed the banning of triple talaq, when the bill was passed in parliament. No other community opposed this. Also if a state funded Madarasa is asked to include basic math, science, social studies the local language and English as part of the curriculam the clerics cry out that their fundamental religious rights are being tampered with. Vedic schools in India now teach all subjects from Math and science to accounting and commerce, languages etc. No Hindu opposed it but welcomed it with open arms. To add to this we have stupid fatwas from clerics like “Insurance” is haram, social media is haram, share market is haram etc etc. Well if Muslims have to follow their prophets deeds and words they should not use cars, buses airplanes, cellphones etc. They should ride camels and were clothes probably woven of goat’s skin. So if at all Muslims are in poverty they only have themselves and their clerics and leaders to blame. No Hindu religious leader out here says that one should not go to school, should not learn English or other languages, should not have their child vaccinated, should not watch movies or go on social media etc. Tell me one person who says this??
Have not many Muslims made it to the top in India, from becoming presidents, sportspersons to scientists to politicians, intelligence directors etc? So saying Islamic terrorism happens due to poverty is just an outright lie and is just Taqiyya
gravenimage says
I think this was a freudian slip from Muslim apologist Chand…
Chand says
JNU contains many fearless humans who recognize India for what it is. A corrupt backward feudal state which oppresses the poor and the weak. India needs a people”s revolution to cleanse the shit that masquarades as a great civilization.
peter says
The real shit in India are the fools like you and your leftist comrades . We should cleanse India of this shit and the process has begun in earnest .Thank you .
Sharyati says
The same JNU has students like Kanhaiya kumar who along with Jihadis wanted to break India into pieces(You surely wont forget the “Tukdee Tukdee” dialog will you?) and many pro-Jihadi professors. JNU needs to be immediately shut down.
gravenimage says
By “people’s revolution” I think Chand means “violent Jihad”…
And look how he is willing to throw out democracy and all the rest of India’s strides. *Ugh*.
gravenimage says
India: University to study “Islamic terrorism,” Muslim profs cry “Islamophobia”
………………………
Under Shari’ah you are not even allowed to mention the savagery of Islam–not critically, at least.