“The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill,” says The Hill, but that isn’t strictly true: The Hill scrubbed my piece there in January 2017 after pressure from Leftists and Islamic supremacists, and since then has been strictly Sharia-compliant.
This piece by Huma Yasin will not be scrubbed. Yet it is tendentious from beginning to end, starting with its title, “Fear of Islam must not drive US foreign policy.” Had Yasin included some statistics about jihad terror attacks, such as the fact that there have been well over 30,000 of them worldwide since 9/11, concern about Islam might not appear to be simply gratuitous “Islamophobia,” as she suggests. Her use of the word “fear,” moreover, is of a piece with the common practice nowadays of regarding fear as a vice, as a kind of wrongdoing, rather than as a natural reaction to a genuine threat that must be met with prudent resistance.
Yasin also ignores the mountain of evidence that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu produced, showing that Iran was not in compliance with the nuclear deal. She complains that the U.S. supports dictators in Muslim countries. That is indeed a shame, but we are talking about countries where there is no tradition of democratic rule at all. The real choice is between relatively secular dictators and Sharia dictators. The U.S. has preferred the former, albeit not during the Obama years.
The implication of Yasin’s article is that there is no jihad threat, and thus no need for U.S. officials to try to protect Americans from that threat. If her words were heeded, the global jihad would be able to advance unopposed and unimpeded. The Hill is extremely irresponsible to publish such an article, even with its hollow disclaimer. But we already knew about The Hill.
“Fear of Islam must not drive US foreign policy,” by Huma Yasin, The Hill, May 10, 2018:
Gina Haspel, the CIA officer known for overseeing torture and destroying videotape evidence of abuse in a black site in Thailand, faced the U.S. Senate confirmation hearings to lead the CIA. This comes just one day after President Donald Trump announced the U.S. has withdrawn from the Iran nuclear deal.
Though the deal was carefully crafted during the Obama administration with global allies, and the U.S. withdrawal now criticized, the U.S. will instead institute nuclear sanctions independently on Iran. The evidence shows Iran has been in compliance with the deal.
This declaration comes two weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments over whether the Muslim ban 3.0, which indefinitely bans Iranian nationals from entering the United States, as well as several other Muslim countries, is constitutional.
This also comes a fortnight after the Senate confirmed Mike Pompeo as secretary of State. He is known for his ties to anti-Islam groups, hawkish policies and hostility toward the former Iran nuclear deal.
Earlier this spring, John Bolton was appointed head of the National Security Administration. In July of last year, Bolton proclaimed from the podium: “The declared policy of the United States of America should be the overthrow of the mullahs’ regime in Tehran … The only solution is to change the regime itself.”
None of this is surprising for a president who stated unabashedly, “I think Islam hates us.”…
The common thread is that the United States is willing to engage in regime change or support of dictators with a horrendous human rights record if it means the U.S. will continue to maintain proxy hegemony in the oil rich Middle East.
The assumption is that Islamophobia is a tool of empire building.
In his 2018 book, “American Islamophobia,”Khaled Beydoun defines Islamophobia as the belief that “Islam is inherently violent, alien, and unassimilable, a presumption driven by the belief that expressions of Muslim identity correlate with a propensity of terrorism.”
Deepa Kumar, associate professor at Rutgers University, states in her 2012 book, “Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire”: [T]he history of ‘Islam and the West,’ as it is commonly termed, is a story not of religious conflict but rather of conflict born of political rivalries and competing imperial agendas … Religion became the screen behind which social and economic conflicts were played out.”….
Westman says
Washington Hill = Washington Swamp and all the parasites that hide in it.
mortimer says
The Koran’s 164 Jihad Verses: K 002:178-179, 190-191, 193-194, 216-218, 244; 003:121-126, 140-143, 146, 152-158, 165-167,169, 172-173, 195; 004:071-072, 074-077, 084, 089-091, 094-095,100-104; 005:033, 035, 082; 008:001, 005, 007, 009-010, 012, 015-017, 039-048,057-060, 065-075; 009:005, 012-014, 016, 019-020, 024-026, 029,036, 038-039, 041, 044, 052, 073, 081, 083,086, 088, 092, 111, 120, 122-123; 016:110; 022:039, 058, 078; 024:053, 055; 025:052; 029:006, 069; 033:015, 018, 020, 023, 025-027, 050; 042:039; 047:004, 020, 035; 048:015-024; 049:015; 059:002, 005-008, 014; 060:009; 061:004, 011, 013; 063:004; 064:014; 066:009; 073:020; 076:008.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdFl__NlOpA
jihad3tracker says
HELLO AGAIN MORTIMER — Yes, “Police Squad” Lieutenant Frank Drebin — actor Leslie Nielsen — would be the perfect taqiyya law enforcement stooge.
By the way, if you and other JW readers have not yet watched the movie masterpiece “AIRPLANE !”, I strongly recommend an encounter with that (truly) hilarious treasure, with Leslie Nielsen as one of several stars.
mgoldberg says
I love Barbara Billingsly who informs the stewardess, that she does speak ‘Jive’
Westman says
Let’s look at, “Fear of Islam must not drive US foreign policy”, and show how absurd it is if the correct words replace “fear of”. We are not afraid and two devastated nations that hosted terrorists can attest to that.
“Vigilence toward Islam must not drive US foreign policy” – sounds so ridiculous it makes the Hill appear to be cowardly pacifists with their heads buried in the sand(or the stock market, etc).
MCD says
Agreed, but I would replace “fear” with “despise”
mgoldberg says
Violence towards all others is what drives Islam. Hence firm understanding of that call to violence, and the strength to resist that violence is indeed called for.
Rage, violence, threats is what Islam, and their ‘leaders’ and their ‘imams’ promise endlessly. If they are not allowed to demand their way, they simply say it is repressing Islam, and that is intolerable, and they threaten violence, and rage.
And so on and so forth. Time for a change. Time for the grown ups to appear.
mortimer says
“MUST NOT” fear Islam … we MUST TRUST Islam …
But “MUST” is like Obama’s COMMANDMENT…
… “The future MUST NOT belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
Muslims KNOW what we must do because MOHAMMED told them so.
We MUST NOT critically analyze Islam’s message of WORLD CONQUEST and resist it.
To RESIST Islam is ISLAMOPHOBIA and all RESISTANCE to Allah’s will is sin and crime.
HOW DARE THE DIRTY KUFAAR RESIST ALLAH’S ‘PERFECT’ REVELATION. They should be punished… according to Sharia law.
J D S says
As I have said many times….FEAR Is the catalist that drives Islam.
From the very beginning Muhammad’s (If he ever actually existed NO HISTORIC PROOF) driver for Islam was FEAR….Fear of losing ones life for leaving islam for individuals and their families if that individual left. FEAR of not becoming an Islamic in Muslim countries or countries overtaken by Islam. It has been said by the most prominent cleric of Islam that if the apostasy law had been removed then Islam would have died in its infancy….
So that is one use if FEAR to keep Islam alive. Now let us look how Islam uses FEAR to establish Islam in non Islamic nations in the modern day….Well I don’t think I need to say more..One can just watch, hear or read today’s REAL, not
FAKE News, to see how FEAR is being used to establish their agenda. today….about the same as always
Stonewall says
Westman says
May 12, 2018 at 2:15 am
Let’s look at, “Fear of Islam must not drive US foreign policy”, and show how absurd it is if the correct words replace “fear of”. We are not afraid and two devastated nations that hosted terrorists can attest to that.
“Vigilence toward Islam must not drive US foreign policy” – sounds so ridiculous it makes the Hill appear to be cowardly pacifists with their heads buried in the sand(or the stock market, etc).
It is absurd. On it’s face.
We are supposed to ignore the teachings of Islam in favor of those Muslims who do not follow the teachings of Islam.
It must also be true that cannabilism should not be feared because it is only radical misguided confused cannibals who actually eat human flesh. The real cannibals, the moderates, they just trade recipes.
Definitely, we should not base our foreign policy on reality.
Stonewall says
Sorry Westman, I should have put your thoughts in quotes and then added my comments after.
I will do better next time.
We are on the same page though…
Troybeam says
It’s not fear that should drive foreign policy but complete understanding of Islam and acknowledgement of its destruction to any nation that it inhabits. Also lets acknowledge the money issue and the possible payments to elected officials to expand Islam instead of their sworn oath to protect, defend and preserve our nations Constitution.
mummymovie says
Great post, Mort.
jihad3tracker says
IS THERE NO BOTTOM TO THE POOP-CHUTE DICKING “ELITE” MEDIA WRITERS CRAVE ???
PRCS says
“Huma Yasin is an attorney, author of the forthcoming book, “Conspiracy: The True Story of the Fort Dix Five,” and co-founder of Facing Abuse in Community Environments. She is a public voices fellow through The OpEd Project.”
So, ‘splain this:
How does one whose “religion” makes its supremacy over ANY and ALL other legal systems so very clear honestly take an oath to:
“solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”
Terry Gain says
PRCS
Good question. The answer is that deceit in the service of Allah is not only permissible, it is commendable. It’s too bad she’s a she or otherwise she could be looking forward to a permanent erection and all the pussy one could ever want. Allah is forgiving and wise.
PRCS says
Good answer!
Cicero says
Debased language in parts. I think you are a refined intelligent person
Write thus, therefore !
Terry Gain says
🙂
Ray Jarman says
PRCS, Others have answered your question very well and I have one for you which is: How is preaching violence and inciting people to kill law enforcement personnel to cause fear within the populace in order tear up the Constitution and replace it with sharia from a podium not sedition? I think that FDR’s speech today might be stated as, “The only fear we have today is that of the pernicious cult of the pedophilic mass murdering thief.”
Ed Lee says
Do they really think we fear Islam? No, we do not. We mistrust Islam. I’ll bet that Huma Yasin is completely unaware of the George Patton quote, “No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. You won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country.” I am fully prepared to make any and all Muslims die for their “country” or “race” or whatever label they put on it. People, you have only two choices here: Either adopt the Patton attitude, or admit that you are a defenseless victim. Which will it be?
Terry Gain says
I fear Islam. And I fear our ignorance about Islam. Islam is the most dangerous ideology extant and in history.
David Munson says
How about Islam and Iman’s changing how they preach hate. 1400 years and it has never changed. Islam needs to change. Now.
Terry Gain says
David Munson
Why shoukd they? Islam is winning.
Dave says
The liberal false narratives and apologetics serving public enemy number one CAIR is Hamas are” feeding alligators hoping to be eaten last” Sir Winston Churchill. My question is when are both the mainstream media aka ministry of propaganda and re thinking camps aka fake news and the seditious Democrats going to be held under the 1918 sedition act? Make America Great Again with the implementation of the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist designation i.e. HR377 & S.68
boakai ngombu says
Make America Great Again with the implementation of the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist designation i.e. HR377 & S.68
+1
Norger says
That would be awesome.
Voytek Gagalka says
Perhaps we should start to “fear” of ANYTHING “The Hill” endorses by publishing it (with or without attached cowardly “disclaimers”). As they say, “beware of snake’s oil.” BEWARE OF THE HILL. BTW, very frequently referenced in “Drudge Report.” I must start to use block against it on my computer.
Barbi Benton says
I just found this website today. I can’t wait 2 tell all my friends & neighbors. Exposure is the enemy of Islam.
gravenimage says
Welcome, Barbi! Jihad Watch is the most informative Anti-Jihad site.
Wellington says
I actually agree that mere fear of Islam should not drive US foreign policy, but accurate knowledge of Islam most certainly should.
A la FDR, the only things we have to fear are fear itself and a dearth of knowledge of what is inimical to liberty.
And if Islam is not a mortal threat to liberty, then there is no such thing as a mortal threat to liberty. Yes, Islam is this awful. One knows this by now or should know it. No shades of gray here.
mortimer says
But WELLLINGTON ALLAH WANTS FEAR IN THE KORAN … KAFIRS SHOULD FEAR MUSLIMS …
While there are over 300 references in the Koran to Allah and fear, there are only 49 references to love.
There are 25 verses about how Allah does not love kafirs (unbelievers)
Only 5 verses actually teach positively about love. Of these 5, 3 are about loving kin or a Muslim brother. One verse commands a Muslim to give for the love of Allah. This leaves only one quasi-universal verse about love: give what you love to charity and even this is contaminated by dualism since Muslim charity only goes to other Muslims.
There are over 400 teachings of hate of all infidels: Jews, Christians, Idolaters, Kafirs.
So much for love. Hate and fear is what Allah demands.
In the hadiths, ALLAH MAKES CLEAR THAT MUSLIMS SHOULD MAKE THE KAFIRS FEAR THEM.
Muslims become RUBBISH if the KAFIRS DO NOT FEAR THEM !
“Prophet Muhammad said; It is expected that the nations will call other nations to share them against you (Muslims) as the eaters call each other to eat from the food in front of them in a large wooden plate A person asked, Will that happen because of our small number on that day? The Prophet said, No. Your number will be great, but you will be rubbish like the rubbish of flood-water. And certainly Allah will remove from the hearts of enemies the fear of you and surely Allah will throw Wahn in your hearts. A person asked, What is Wahn, O Messenger of Allah? The Prophet said, Wahn is to love this world and to hate death.” – Abu Dawud 4284
Wellington says
But fear of fear put forth by something heinous or ignorant, moritmer, plays into the hands of those who inspire fear. This was my overall point.
Put another way, you don’t fear the bully, you defeat him. If necessary, you terminate him.
mortimer says
Dear Wellington, agree that we should keep a cool head and our powder dry. We are perhaps disagreeing on ‘fear’ when I mean “SUSPICION” when I say fear.
A favorite Latin quote by Virgil (Aeneid) : “TIMEO DANAOS ET DONA FERENTES.” (popularly translated as “I fear Greeks bearing gifts.” (those bringing a Trojan Horse)
FDR, is a an example I personally avoid, since he was NOT afraid (suspicious) of Stalin when he should have been. FDR handed all of central Europe in to the clutches of Stalin.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Wellington.
somehistory says
What else but malarky and lies can one expect from a msolim hoping to obscure the truth about evil islam.
Little huma is biased and bigoted.
Knowing she didn’t mean it like she wrote it, I must point out that she says the “ban” would keep moslims out of moslim countries.” Muslim ban 3.0, which indefinitely bans Iranian nationals from entering the United States, as well as several other Muslim countries,”
The “deal” was “carefully crafted” to give iran every thing the rulers wanted…and more…and there is no “evidence” that it was “working” to prevent their development of weapons, but “evidence” that they were “working” to do that very thing.
c matt says
Khaled Beydoun defines Islamophobia as the belief that “Islam is inherently violent, alien, and unassimilable, a presumption driven by the belief that expressions of Muslim identity correlate with a propensity of terrorism.
He’s right – there is absolutely no evidence of this, if you exclude the Core-an, the Hay-dith, and 1400 years of history.
On the other hand, I can agree that neither fear of Islam, nor fear of CAIR, nor fear of AIPAC for that matter should drive US foreign policy.
Terry Gain says
“Khaled Beydoun defines Islamophobia as the belief that “Islam is inherently violent, alien, and unassimilable, a presumption driven by the belief that expressions of Muslim identity correlate with a propensity of terrorism.”
The belief that Islam is violent is based on observation and a knowledge of history. Those who understand Islamic doctrine also understand why Islam is indeed violent, alien and not able to assimilate .
I think it is naive in the extreme not to fear Islam given that leftists have embraced Islam. We conservatives have our work cut out for us. 9/11 should have been a wake-up call about Islam
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
“Fear of Islam must not drive US foreign policy.”
No Huma, as Wellington rightly stated in his comment above, profound and thorough understanding of Islam is what should drive foreign policy. But you would prefer that people fear being called an islamophobe.
“The evidence shows Iran has been in compliance with the deal.”
Writing this, in the light of Netanyahu’s show and tell displays how brazenly false your statement is. Iran wasn’t even compliant upon signing the deal. This deal only exists because big globalist business want the sanctions on Iran to disappear so they can make big money deals with the devil.
“He is known for his ties to anti-Islam groups, hawkish policies and hostility toward the former Iran nuclear deal.”
Ad Hominem attack – your argument is automatically disqualified.
“Khaled Beydoun defines Islamophobia as the belief that ‘Islam is inherently violent, alien, and unassimilable, a presumption driven by the belief that expressions of Muslim identity correlate with a propensity of terrorism.'”
Gee Huma, what if that definition is validated by the facts? Is it still an illogical phobia with all the implied irrational fears?
mummymovie says
IT “MUST NOT”, huh?
Who the f%*k says so?
Some wet-behind-the-ears moslem SJW attorney, and author of an apologist book about convicted jihadists?
It is indeed reckless and irresponsible for The Hill to publish an article like this from this America-hating lawyer, who has absolutely no qualifications to speak on the matter.
Just because some social justice warrior has a law degree, and has found some ghost-writer to pen a book for her, this means we all have to treat her opinion as sacrosanct?
Her statement brings to mind B. Hussein O’s declaration that “the future must not belong to… well, us.”
I beg to differ.
The opposite of both statements are actually true.
To hell with them!
PRCS says
Our president is wrong.
Islam is a written ideology which teaches hatred of and supremacy over ALL “unbelievers”.
Not just us.
Everywhere.
Davegreybeard says
Our President is president of US.
Not everyone and everywhere.
PRCS says
Stated while campaigning for the presidency.
And wrong in thinking an ideology concocted roughly 1200 years before our nation’s creation selectively hates “us”.
gravenimage says
It hates all Infidels. We are Infidels.
Terry Gain says
Islam is no more to be feared than cancer. Islam is peace. Down is up. Bad is good. Slavery is freedom.
Wellington says
Seconded.
traci94 says
The burden should be on Muslims and Islamic apologists to tell us WHY we shouldn’t fear Islam after over 1400 years of violent history AND the continued use of verses in the Qur’an to justify violence. I’m tired of people just throwing that term around. Heck yeah, I’m Islamophobic, but there needs to be a better term because phobia implies irrational fear and fear of Islam is very, very rational.
Wellington says
Essentially in agreement though I would advocate nausea towards Islam more than fear. Thus, I am not an Islamophobe but rather an Islamonausean.
After all, mortal fear never makes the best enemy of evil. Rather, utter contempt does. Then you go from there.
Brian hoff says
There was long periods of peace with Islam by the Roman Catholic church. Than if Islam convert people to Islam by the sword why are there christian left in the middle east and hindu left in India. The truth is Islam never convert people by the sword.
WPM says
The “long” periods of peace is when the Roman Catholic Church got off its hind quarters and order the Crusades to kick Islam out of Europe after 400 years of pillaging , raping ,and enslaving Europeans and Christians in the near East. The small number of Christians in the Middle East are under constant attacks today as their numbers drop near 0 in places like Syria and to 0 in Yemen .Millions have die or were force to convert to Islam in Africa the Middle East into Asia over the last 1200 years it is a historic fact .
Indiana Tom says
The truth is Islam never convert people by the sword.
LOL.
gravenimage says
“Brian hoff”–really, “DefenderofIslam”–wants us to believe that Islam is peaceful if a tiny handful of non-Muslims are able to survive, living under oppression. *Ugh*.
mummymovie says
Spot on, traci.
Cheer Bear Girl says
Ignorance of Islam must not drive US. foreign policy. Islam and Jihad are inseparable from each other. Muslims lie to further the cause of Islam another good reason not to trust them.
mummymovie says
+1
Georg says
“Religion became the screen behind which social and economic conflicts were played out.” Keep telling yourself that, Deepa. But ignore the truth at everyone’s peril. Whether it’s the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the Islamic State, the Islamic Emirates of the Taliban, or Erdogan’s attempts to return the “modern” and “moderate” Turkey to caliphate–you are shamefully mistaken (though probably don’t really believe what you say). Also, your dissonance is showing.
Chatillon says
I am sick and tired of these Mohammedan “scholars” wasting my time and endangering my life by trying to convinces me that Islam is not inherently violent.
Instead, why don’t they waste their own time and risk their own lives by trying to convince the jihadis that is inherently peaceful?
dsinc says
Religion became the screen behind which social and economic conflicts were played out.”….
No, religion became the screen behind which Arab Muslims intend to conquer the world.
Nannette says
After reading the article and the comments I have to say how surprised I am that The Hill obviously supports Islamic terrorism and even encourages it!
Jason Klingor says
Why More Muslims Won’t Condemn ISIS
https://americanfreepress.net/why-more-muslims-wont-condemn-isis/
https://americanfreepress.net/?s=Muslims
Indiana Tom says
Actually the Liberals, Dhimmicraps, Progtards, Swamp Thangs, RINOs, Cathoholic Liberation Theologists, Global Elites, Lamestream Prostratant Churches, and others of this ilk are a larger threat than the Pedophile Profit People. We could easily defeat Mighty Mo and his Religion of Pieces without the Progtards always mommy coddling and enabling the little blood sucking leeches.
Over 90% of Fuzzy Muzzies in Europe are on the taxpayer dole. So how many of the little leeches would come to Europe and America if they knew that they were not going to get all sorts of free crap? Think they would have all day to sit in a Mosque and figure out new and exciting ways to kill us?
Dr. Darkpool says
You have hit the nail right on the head. I can’t add anything other than to comment; well said.
Politicianophobia says
“No political system or material power should put hindrances in the way of preaching Islam. It should leave every individual free to accept or reject it, and if someone wants to accept it, it should not prevent him or fight against him. If someone does this, IT IS THE DUTY OF ISLAM TO FIGHT HIM UNTIL HE IS KILLED OR UNTIL HE DECLARES SUBMISSION.”
“Politics is a weapon.”
“Peace is the absence of opposition.”
“Allah break the backs of the tyrants and the oppressors and the unjust and those nations of the world that are not with them. Allah they have gathered against us and are scheming against us, so scheme against them.”
“Oh Allah, destroy America”
“The West will be eliminated.”
“Sabotaging its miserable from within.”
“Ultimately we can never be full citizens of this country because there is no way we can be fully committed to the institutions and ideologies of this country.”
“Muhammed is the apostle of Allah, those who follow him are merciful to one another, ruthless to unbelievers.”
Farrakhan says “Adolf Hitler was a great man and white people are subhumans created by an ancient African scientist.”
“If the ummah understands what is required of us as Muslims, what does a caliphate look like? What a system of Islam looks like and how to re-establish caliphate, according to the method of Muhammed, the ummah will rise up and know exactly what we have to do.”
The Muslim Brotherhood motto is: Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. The Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the name of Allah is our highest hope.”
There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the Shari’ah from God; anything else is mere emotionalism and impulsiveness.”
Hell, no don’t worry about Islam or the Muslim Brotherhood expanding daily. Hey, forget about it.
Firefox says
Islam won’t change because it will no longer be Islam. There is no peace or love or acceptance or tolerance or compassion or equality or freedom in Islam. It is only perpetual oppression, repression, subjugation, misogyny, sexual perversion, death, supremacism, expansionism, and hate toward all non-moslems. Knowledge of Islam, not fear, should drive all free world policy against Islam.
Stonewall says
There is no religion in Islam.
Norger says
“Islamophobia” is the belief that “Islam is inherently violent, alien, and unassimilable, a presumption driven by the belief that expressions of Muslim identity correlate with a propensity of terrorism.”
The problem Huma is that many learned, knowledgeable people, who have actually taken the time to study what Islam teaches, believe that this statement is demonstrably true. At a minimum, this is a subject that is worthy of an open and honest discussion or debate. Your use of the term “Islamophobe” betrays your desperate fear of the kuffar studying your ideology.
Hogdude says
Who said “Islam is a religion of peace”? Oh, yeah, Barack HUSSEIN Obama. Sure, and I’ve got seashore land for sale in Arizona. And, prayer rugs we’re selling wholesale.
livingengine says
Deepa Kumar is the quintessential associate professor.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/08/rutgers-prof-says-us-is-worse-than-the-islamic-state-then-complains-of-death-threats
Here she is claiming the Islamophobes receive 50 billion dollars in funding. @ 8:20
This isn’t just a mistake. It is repeated back to her, and she acknowledges it.
@3:21 Loonwatch is featured.
@11:01 she tells us that she held an event far larger than Pamela’s 35k 2010 911 observance, and that she forced Pamela out of the city.
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10698
Kumar is also used as a source at Wikipedia to call SIOA an Islamophobic org.
Deepa is dumb.
Her sloppiness continues here, where the video has been edited twice to, I am assuming, omit some of her other misstatements, such as when the moderator has to interrupt her when she confuses Michele Obama with Michele Bachman. @33:55
@1:04:30 She indicates a desire to work with CAIR, and admiration for Tariq Ramadan.
@48:59 she says the same thing that happened to the Japanese interned during WW2 has happened to the Muslims.
@1:08:00 she is asked about the Material Support law. Instead of talking about this, Deepa Kumar begins talking about COINTELPRO @1:16:00. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbEMS4-h1U0
Here is an appearance of Deepa Kumar on RT where she throws around the figure of trillions of dollars.@3:30 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMnDf75aHns
Mic Lawler says
What islamomaniac provacteurs and leftist stooges call the fear of islam is nothing more than an accurate appraisal of its teachings, long history of murder, rape, looting and oppression, misery and cultural backwardness as well as its current vile agenda. It’s amazing how successful the purveyors of our destruction have been in corrupting both language and thought of our culture by adding phobia to the end of every noun describing the degeneration they wish to promote
s says
Someone has shaped the conversation by using the terminology “fear”… we do not fear Islam… we will NOT allow a foreign Nation who seeks Global Control… whose beliefs are anti-American to invade this nation for a peaceful (the religion of peace) take-over of our Country…. we will NOT allow those who seek to murder those who do not subscribe to their world view to murder our Citizens… has nothing to do with FEAR! We will, however, forever stand against all who seek the destruction of the United States of America.
Savvy Kafir says
How about HATRED of Islam? Can we base our foreign (and domestic) policy on that?
gravenimage says
The Hill: “Fear of Islam must not drive US foreign policy”
……………………………
Huma Yasin is a nasty apologist for Jihad. Of course she doesn’t want any acknowledgement of the threat of Islam.