I got this message this morning from YouTube about the video above, which dates from 2016:
Now, I’ve never had ads run on any of my YouTube videos, and have never received a penny from YouTube for them. They were demonetized collectively from the beginning. In light of that fact, I found it curious that YouTube would see fit to send me this notice now, telling me that one random video from two years ago was going to run with “limited or no ads.” All my videos have always run with no ads.
This is just still more of the social media giants’ ongoing efforts to stigmatize and ultimately silence all foes of jihad terror, and all those who stand against the far-Left agenda.
Watch the video and ponder the situation we are in, when a reasoned presentation of demonstrable facts would be considered controversial and “not suitable for all advertisers.”
Ki Kollbrunner says
Is islam a religion?
jihad3tracker says
HELLO KI — As “superlatively brilliant” (Robert Spencer’s words) David Wood said during the early minutes of Part 2 of his video titled The Psychology Of Islam, “Spoiler alert! Allah is the repressed subconscious of Muhammad.”
The entire three parts as probably too long for most of us who have daily obligations & nightly tasks, but Part 1 is a relatively brief 17 minutes. Consider viewing it for an excellent, lucid dose explaining how basic human psychology manifests itself through the “commands” of Islam’s supreme pathological illusion.
PRCS says
Yes!
And so very much more. Islam’s complete way of life. Every aspect of it. The “straight path”. Islam’s “yellow brick road”. Toilet etiquette to barbaric punitive punishments. Fasting and praying to the conduct of warfare. From birth to death.
If it were just a religion, of course, its “flock” wouldn’t be the worldwide threat they are.
But it’s not and that’s why they are.
Leon Degney says
I disagree that Islam is a religion per se’ in my opinion it is more of a cult. There is nothing anyone can do or say against Islam without being threatened with death. What religion threatens death if criticised?
PRCS says
Islam.
Per Robert Spencer, yes–it’s a religion.
Per others, and accurately, too–a bad religion.
J D S says
Cult?.that hits the mark. Satan driven? Most certainly! A figment of imagination of a deranged man? Oh yes! Illegal? It should be! Upheld by liberals, leftists and Cowards?
Definitely!
JawsV says
Yes, a religion but a BAD religion.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Jaws.
Richard says
Yes, there is an old line: “God uses some people. Some people use God.” The Thgs in India (from which our word “thug” was rightly born) was a religion that strangled thousands of people to the glory of the goddess Kali every year, until it was forcibly repressed by the British in the 1800s. The Scandinavians likewise asphyxiated in one form or another countless victims to the fertility deities Freyja/Freyr at least into the late eleventh century. Romans buried Celts alive. The human heart sacrifices and cannibalism of the Aztecs and Mayans are far too well known to describe. They were never completely suppressed. Islam does not call its extermination of nonbelievers sacrifices, but the end is the same. What good is a religion if you have to threaten to kill people in order to get them to join it? And, of course, Islam is worse. Islamic documents quoted on this web site actually records Mohammed raping the wives and daughters of his enemies on military expeditions. I’m not saying Islam isn’t a valid religion. The god of the Celts and Scandinavians, Cumulos/Freyr, had horns.
Terry Gain says
KK
Yes, that’s exactly the question we should be asking since it is beyond argument that Islam is violent. So let’s talk about whether Islam is a religion. Let me begin by quoting Imam Obama who said: ” no religion condones killing”. Since Islam not only condones killing, but commands it – in for example 9:29 – it follows that according to Imam Obama Islam is not a religion. At least not a legitimate religion.
PRCS says
Obama, is the son–and later the step son–of Muslim men.
He either did not know what Islam actually teaches at the time he made that statement (rather implausibly) or was banking that the average “filthy kuffar’s” was too ignorant of its teachings to challenge him.
gravenimage says
Exactly, PRCS.
PRCS says
I really should check my punctuation a bit better before posting.
jihad3tracker says
HELLO TO PRCS & OTHER COMMENTERS — I have mentioned this video (by David Wood) many times before, but here we go again: “THREE STAGES OF JIHAD”
David includes several slices of Muslim Barry Soetoro Hussein Obama’s taqiyya blabber.
With an extensive history & context for the essential agenda derived from Muhammad’s subconscious mind, that video is a superb resource to understand Islam’s agenda.
PRCS says
Thank you, J3:
I’ve seen most of his humorous, informative vids; that one included.
Giacomo Latta says
Did the Media ever challenge one thing he said?
Leon Degney says
Agree.
Aaron says
Yes and no. In one sense there is really nothing that is a religion except the one true revealed religion that is recorded in the Bibles and found today in all Catholic and Orthodox churches. On the hand, it serves as a religion and in this sense of the term every worldview is a “religion”, but there are really only two such religion, Christianity and Satanism. So as different as they may be both Liberalism, as a secular religion begun by Epicurus, and Islam, which had its start upon Christian heresy, are types of the former “religion”.
However, what I came here to post is that YouTube knows what’s up. Robert Spencer is dangerous because he encourages a rational discourse outside of the prescribed limits of LIberalism (i.e. the only thing in which a rational discussion is allowable is when the subject is about the natural world). Obviously then this Spencer fellow is demonstrating an aggressive and hateful contempt for people’s right to be free (i.e. unbounded) by any sense of rationality. He is a monster–at least, that is how you’ll see him if you’re a progressive liberal (conservative liberals, i.e. classical liberals, may not necessarily see him this way though).
Arauna says
LOL – No, it is a political ideology (form of hegemony) which masquarades as a religion. Unfortunately the Western world is under the influence of post modern philosophy so they want all to be under a big brother utopia – which will fail – because one cannot force all people to be equal, especially if one group believes their law system is superior to all others.
Edward Vaughn says
Actually, if you examine it with any degree of objectivity you will find that it is a cult, nothing more, nothing less. EVERYTHING revolves around Muhammad—what he said, what he did, how he dressed, how he squatted to pee, what he ate (and how he ate it: with three fingers only), his hatred of dogs (because they’re smart and can suss out rotten personalities), even down to wearing what appears to be a dress. And so on. A religion? It is to laugh.
krishna says
youtube doesn’t allow controversial videos to be monetized like criticism of communism since youtube ad apocalypse started by liberal companies
Thomas says
And we must not forget that Jihad can be accomplished with non-violent means (stealth) as well.
JawsV says
And Demographic Jihad. The over-breeding Mohammedans (polygamy/child brides).
NewWorldParty says
Read Mark Dice’s book “Fake News” to get many examples of lie from the media, Fakebook, Google and Youtube and how they suppress conservative voices.
NewWorldParty says
Broken Moral Compass of Google & Silicon Valley
https://youtu.be/pcv_-C7nApY
Mark Berlinger says
The indiscriminate modern liberal view is that Islam is at least the equal of Christianity. Their reality is that the Muslim agenda, to destroy and replace Western Civilization, is a lie told by conservatives to spread hate on another minority. Liberals don’t bother to think about this evil as evil, because when your belief is political foes are racists, you don’t ever have to think about it.
PRCS says
“the Muslim agenda, to destroy and replace Western Civilization”
Islam’s written goal is to destroy and replace all non-Muslim civilizations.
Lookmann says
MSM , social media and now even internet browsers turn against Islam criticism / critics.
When I clicked on bookmarked ‘Geller Report’ link , I got a warning that the site was ‘unsafe’ [ Google Chrome browser]
I went to the site after clicking ‘advanced options’ .
Same thing happened with ‘Firefox’ too.
The fight against jihad getting harder, increasingly.
strats4ever says
Use “Brave”, works fine (also disables a lot of garbage)
Mark Berlinger says
Firefox does not exhibit that behavior on my computer. Pls post the link.
Is Google your seach engine in Firefox?
Lookmann says
The following message appears with Google search in Firefox
————————————————————————————————————
Your connection is not secure
The owner of pamelageller.com has configured their website improperly. To protect your information from being stolen, Firefox has not connected to this website.
Learn more…
Report errors like this to help Mozilla identify and block malicious sites
mortimer says
There are many advertisers who CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH as supported by incontrovertible evidence from the Islamic primary source texts, from Islamic history and from Islam’s own canonical commentaries and from the codifications in Sharia law manuals.
Clearly, the EXPOSURE and DISSEMINATION of NORMATIVE, AUTHENTIC, UNIMPEACHABLE ISLAMIC TEACHINGS is something that certain ‘ADVERTISERS’ do not want to occur.
DogOnPorch says
As someone of note said defiantly: ” The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
JawsV says
Obama. An Islam apologist.
Lu says
Rather islamopanderer. Actually, that citation is one of the strongest indications of his pandering … Apologia that is hard to believe it was really uttered.
Leon Degney says
NO! A Muslim through and through.
Lydia Church says
That should read: “The future must not belong to those who promote the prophet of Islam.”
~Lydia Church
Charlie says
I think we need to step back for a moment and stop slamming youtube. Youtube is a corporation and they need to make money. They are sending a message that there may be coming a new way for conservatives to post and not be so challenged. I have to agree. Youtube does not wan to be in the middle of a political fray, challenging or emotional debate. I will soon be joining Redtube. This is a valuable communications service and they need to make money. They may be taking a lot of heat for your videos. Let’s look out for them too.
Westman says
YouTube is Google and Google is becoming a dangerous monopoly that has, at its core, like Facebook, the character of a sustained adolescent and the power to tip the scales of politics.
jayell says
If one is a ‘good muslim’ one is bound to revere the Prophet Mohammed as the ‘perfect man’ and emulate his example. If he were alive in the UK today and behaving as he did about 1,400 years ago, this particular ‘perfect man’ would probably find himself in Parkhurst High Security Prison for a long stretch. Bearing that in mind, how are we logically supposed to be view muslims as (in our terms) ‘good people’ when they are supposed to be emulating a perverted, murdering, thieving criminal?
JawsV says
Muhammed never prophesied anything. He’s a fraud.
PRCS says
He didn’t split the moon or ride on Buraq, either.
Terry Gain says
But he did go to hell. But not until after he was poisoned.
jayell says
Shame no one’s answered my question.
It’s becoming very irritating hearing ‘good’, ‘nice’, ‘rational’ people saying that while it’s reasonable to despise islam because of the appalling, offensive (and criminal?) teachings that can be clearly seen in black and white on the pages of the Qur’an etc., we should all show utmost tolerance, civility and respect to those ‘decent’, trustworthy’, ‘law-abiding’ people amongst us who have chosen to be followers of this ‘faith’ that commands them to put those utterly disreputable teachings into practice. Whilst I am most certainly NOT advocating any unlawful activity whatsoever, all the evidence from Western societies where muslims have been allowed to enter in any numbers shows that these people, following the demands of their ‘religion’, simply cannot be trusted to behave like ‘decent’, ‘law-abiding’, ‘trustworthy’ citizens and it is therefore totally illogical to treat them as if they were. Or are we supposed to wait until our islamic ‘friends’ actually prove their malevolence by committing their predictable atrocities, and then pick up the bits? Because, at this rate, there soon won’t be many people left to pick the bits up.
gravenimage says
YouTube: Robert Spencer video “Is Islam A Religion of Peace?” “isn’t suitable for all advertisers”
…………………….
In other words, how dare anyone even ask this question?
YouTube is enabling the horrors of Islam.