And gets her husband fired. She had it coming: she had the wrong opinions. My latest in FrontPage:
“Amy Mek” has 229,000 followers on Twitter, and is firmly and outspokenly opposed to jihad terror and Sharia oppression. President Trump has retweeted her. So as far as “journalist” Luke O’Brien of the Huffington Post was concerned, she had to be destroyed.
On Thursday, the HuffPo published O’Brien’s exposé: “Trump’s Loudest Anti-Muslim Twitter Troll Is A Shady Vegan Married To An (Ousted) WWE Exec: @AmyMek anonymously spread hate online for years. She can’t hide anymore.”
“She can’t hide anymore”! Luke O’Brien in his piece does his best to portray Amy as a monster who should be shunned by all decent people. Amy was rude to a Muslim store clerk, he tells us. She has an odd relationship with a prisoner, he says.
But her primary sin has nothing to do with her personal life, however lavishly O’Brien exposes it. The main reason why Luke O’Brien hates Amy Mek and wants you to hate her, too, is because she “tirelessly spewed far-right propaganda and, above all, Islamophobia.” He also says, predictably, that she is “racist.” As evidence, O’Brien points out that she has praised Milo, who is so “racist” that he is in a gay marriage with a black man; as for “Islamophobia,” of course O’Brien means that she opposes jihad mass murder and Sharia oppression of women, non-Muslims, and others — in O’Brien’s mind, as a doctrinaire Left-fascist, all those who oppose such things are “bigots.”
“Islamophobia” is, of course, a propaganda term designed to intimidate people into fearing to oppose jihad mass murder, and that is exactly the way O’Brien uses it. In The Coming of the Third Reich, historian Richard J. Evans explains how, in the early days of National Socialist Germany, Stormtroopers (Brownshirts) “organized campaigns against unwanted professors in the local newspapers [and] staged mass disruptions of their lectures.” To express dissent from Nazi positions became a matter of taking one’s life into one’s hands. The idea of people of opposing viewpoints airing their disagreements in a civil and mutually respectful manner was gone. One was a Nazi, or one was silent (and fearful).
Luke O’Brien and the Huffington Post are the modern-day Brownshirts who have targeted and attempted to destroy the life of Amy Mek, who recounts the success he has had here: her husband has been fired from his job, even though he has nothing to do with her tweets, and the family has received death threats. For that, Luke O’Brien can stand up and take a bow. This Huffington Post article is the equivalent of the Brownshirts’ “organized campaigns against unwanted professors in the local newspapers.”
The targeting of Amy Mek is bigger than Amy Mek, just as Britain’s jailing of Tommy Robinson is bigger than Tommy Robinson. You may not like Amy Mek. You may think she should go about things with a different style. But make no mistake: the Huffington Post and Luke O’Brien are sending you a message. That message is this: if you dare to dissent from the Leftist agenda, if you dare to oppose jihad terror and stand for the equality of rights of all people against Sharia oppression, we will destroy you.
They will brook no dissent, any more than Comrade Stalin or the Führer did. The Huffington Post and Luke O’Brien envision a world in which all those whom they deem to be “racists” and “Islamophobes” are silenced. Right now their weapon for that silencing is what Hillary Clinton recommended: peer-pressure and shaming. They’re trying to shame Amy Mek into silence, as they have tried for years to shame all those they smear as “bigots” into silence. If that doesn’t work, then come the Antifa thugs, who with a rock or a bike lock or a baseball bat will let the “Nazis” know that they stand on the side of righteousness, and make sure the “Nazis” are silent by making them physically incapable of talking.
If that doesn’t intimidate the rest into silence, then other measures will be forthcoming. This is the totalitarian initiative in America. Will free society in the United States survive the likes of Luke O’Brien and the Huffington Post? That’s anybody’s guess right now.
Georg says
Doesn’t seem to be much the left or Islam fear more than freedom and self-determination.
boakai ngombu says
TRUTH and as much of that as is possible to broadcast into every neighborhood, city councils, county and state venues. even universities, PTA meetings; congregations and church groups,
otherwise the GRUNGE of islam (a failed religion) will contaminate every environment where decency and kindness should be, engendering hope, not despair.
Andy says
Society is diseased with the virus of liberalism!
Andy says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZaRd3-HEDA
jihad3tracker says
****** THIS SH*THOLE HAS A SERIOUS PERSONALITY DISORDER. ******
Look at the length of the item he wrote. Judging by its size, he is totally obsessed with destroying Amy Mek — ALONG WITH OTHERS CLOSE TO HER.
Robert really nails (in his remarks above) the sickness of Luke O’Brien and his uber-Left associates at HuffPo.
And, for a huge encounter with persons as vile as O’Brien, READ SOME OF THE COMMENTERS AFTER HIS ARTICLE, via the link given.
Please, a favor: if a path to O’Brien can be found (email) take a few minutes to shred him, but make the subject line NEUTRAL, SO HE WILL OPEN IT.
And it would be prudent to use a “disposable” email account — NOT your main one — so if you are flooded with spam in reply, that will not affect your ability to us the main email account.
Denny Abrahamsson says
Its amazing how many nazis work for far left news channels. But maybe not since nazis and far left has so much in common. They all have the same roots.
Michael Copeland says
“I am a socialist”
Adolf Hitler
mortimer says
Dhimmi coward Luke O’Brien is an accomplice of JIHAD VIGILANTISM. He should get the COUNT JULIAN award for the BIGGEST BETRAYAL of non-Muslims by a non-Muslim traitor.
What does Luke O’Brien think is gained by helping MUSLIM VIGILANTES to find a victim?
What would he think if someone helped vigilantes to find him?
gravenimage says
Robert Spencer in FrontPage: Modern Journalism: Huffington Post Reporter Doxes Counter-Jihadi
……………………..
Pretty much standard operating procedure for HuffPo. *Ugh*.
Rarely says
Pretty tough article in Huffpost. If defamatory they should be called to account.
revereridesagain says
They must be called to account. These people are totally out of control. Imagine what our lives will be like if they ever regain full power.
Julea Bacall says
Exactly what should happen! He broke on of the borders on ‘free speech. Libel, slander (but she broke some of the borders too but his was directed at one person in a vicious way) And ot just him but the Huffpo for printing it.
Lydia Church says
The brown shirts are coming for you; freedom of speech is over. That is their message in their article.
Well I have news for them, I WILL NEVER BE SILENCED!
If all I have left is a piece of cardboard and a marker (which any homeless person manages to get), the message will march on. We will speak the truth no matter what. islam is evil!
Lydia Church says
As I often say:
I AM NOT AFRAID.
AND I WILL NOT COMPROMISE WITH EVIL.
Billy Chickens says
I’m not afraid anymore either. They already fired me from my job last year so what else can they do to me? Take away my computer?
mortimer says
Lydia, are you willing to go to jail for your convictions like Tommy?
Billy Chickens says
Mortimer, are YOU willing to go to jail like Tommy? Are YOU hoping Lydia will say no? Why is that?
TR is famous. Maybe Lydia is also but I don’t know her. As for me, not that you asked, I’m not famous so I’d just be placed in our local jail which everyone calls the local Hilton, not because it’s like Hanoi, but because it’s a truly nice place for all the ingrates to be waited on hand and foot by the state.
But my guess is that that is not your intended meaning. Would we go to prison where we were in grave danger of being raped and killed. Are we THAT brave?
The answer is: if I have to go, which I seriously doubt at this point because Trump is in the White House and not Clinton (not sure where Lydia is…Australia?) I’d be greatly worried about my safety. But truly afraid…no.
God gives His grace to those of His when they need it, especially at the moment they’re being killed. I’m sure he gave the Christians in the Colosseum His grace as they were being torn apart and Joan of Arc grace to bear her trial and burning at the stake. He gives His grace to those poor Christians in the Mid East being slaughtered, beheaded, raped, torn apart. He gave his grace to James Foley and the 21 Coptic Christians beheaded on the beach, a few of whom looked directly into the camera moments before their beheading by the Islamist filth.
Mortimer – this is a real live battle between good and evil played out on the world stage where half the world wants the other half to be gone forever so Lucifer can rule over what God made – the earth and all its inhabitants… and of course, all of Christendom and Israel.
Without the supernatural dimension, viewing Islam and the Left vs the rest of humanity makes no sense. Without God, the entire scenario is reduced to politics.
Julea Bacall says
But I have a question. Don’t you think Huffpo should NOT have printed his attack? Free Speech DOES have borders and limits. It really does.
infidel says
HOLLYWOOD and BOLLYWOOD DHIMMIS COMBINE TO STAB HINDUS IN THE BACK.
The recent episode of the TV show Quantico, where Hindus are shown as terrorists and then trying to blame Muslims. For all those on this forum: This American show QUANTICO starts a Bollywood Hindu DHIMMI and FEMINAZZI by the name of Priyanka Chopra and who recently shed tears for Rohyingya Muslims by visiting their camps and did not utter a word of sympathy for Hindus butchered by these Rohyingya animals. She is a known DHIMMI who kowtows to the Muslim Mafia running Bollywood today under the command of the notorious criminal turned terrorist Dawood Ibrahim from Karachi Pakistan.. She is just a SHAMELESS BIMBO..
http://www.bollywoodlife.com/news-gossip/angry-indians-slam-priyanka-chopras-latest-episode-of-quantico-for-showing-indians-as-terrorists-check-out-tweets/
infidel says
What is it about Islam and Muslims that bring out the worst treachery in mankind..
infidel says
The day is not far when even a peaceful Whiteman from the midwest will be shown as a terrorist by Hollywood.
Chand says
Why cannot Priyanka Chopra visit suffering refugees fleeing from State persecution? Just because the refugees are Muslims?
Why does she have to prove that she is equally concerned about Hindus publicly? How do you know she isn’t sad about the massacre of the Hindus? There are no predominantly Hindu refugee camps so how can she visit one to prove it?
And she probably didn’t visit the camps to prove anything but to provide some hope to the traumatized people there.
And this plot of Hindus committing terror and blaming Muslims is just a work of fiction. No need to go bonkers over it. Anything is allowed in fiction.
So the discussion is about Amy Mek and whether she is a racist and a bigot and promptly a compassionate woman is called a ‘shameless bimbo’. Wow! That’s deep.
Hari Singh says
Not engaging in ”Islamophobia” means not saying anything likely to disturb the religious sensibilities of Muslims as it may disturb them. But life is a two way street-don’t expect one party to act civil while the other has a free hand to create mayhem and murder.
No one is amending the Koran for its kafirphobia or stopping the local mosque from singing Koranic Suras blearing vile names about non-Muslims, pigs, apes, the worst of all peoples etc.
Its sort of like a treaty, a social contract if you will, both sides must honor it or there’s no treaty. If we’re nice you have to be nice.
mortimer says
Han, the word ‘Islamophobia’ is a portmanteau that combines two elements that don’t go together. A phobia of a political IDEOLOGY is not necessarily a bad thing. As a political ideology, Islam has visible, obvious and measurably nefarious effects, such as the deaths of over 80 million Indians and 270 million victims of jihad worldwide.
‘Islamophobia’ is a slander to deceive people to think criticism of Islam is a form of ‘madness’. The reverse is true. Criticizing Islam is a sign of rationality. Anyone who is able to criticize Islam accurately has put a great deal of BRAINWORK into understanding it and comprehending this Death Cult.
mortimer says
Those who use the term ‘Islamophobia’ to denounce those with valid critiques of Islam actually denounce their own lack of intellectual honesty as well as their lack of intellectual rigor.
Jean says
In avoiding eye contact with the Muslim clerk, and skin contact in the return of money, the lady was actually following what Muslims would consider proper conduct for a woman when in the company of a man not her immediate relative. From a classical Muslim perspective (as practiced in Iran and many other Muslim countries), she would rather be rude if looking him the eye: this would be an invitation for sex. Touching him, even more so.
O’Brien then, by his own standards, is an islamophobe. He admits to considering widespread Muslim social codes “rude”.
I suppose the instance shows how difficult it was for him to come up with anything at all incriminating against this woman. He had to resort to dubbing veganism “shady”, and put a negative spin on a behaviour which might as well have been interpreted in the opposite way – as showing respect for Muslim sensibilities by keeping the distance between men and women…
Quite apart from that, the main impression I got from the article was that its writer exhibits the behaviour of a stalker. The man seems to, for some reason, have an unhealthy obsession with this woman.