The Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) indefatigably pushes the notion that Muslims are victims of widespread harassment and discrimination in the U.S. This is in order to deflect attention away from jihad terror activity and to buttress the notion that counter-terror scrutiny of Muslim communities is simply more of this persecution. But actual “hate crimes” against Muslims are so thin on the ground that they have to be manufactured, as in this case.
“Ventura County denies pulling off woman’s head-covering in response to civil rights suit,” by Megan Diskin, Ventura County Star, July 11, 2018 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
In a response filed Wednesday to a federal lawsuit, the County of Ventura said a local Muslim woman’s head-covering was “gently and respectfully” removed for security reasons while she was in jail custody and denied her allegations it was stripped from her.
Attorneys for the county filed the 13-page document in U.S. District Court as part of its defense in the federal civil rights lawsuit brought forth by Newbury Park resident Jennifer Hyatt. The litigation stems from a Jan. 1, 2017, incident at Ventura County jail in which deputies from the Ventura County Sheriff’s Office allegedly violated her constitutional rights by prohibiting her from wearing a head covering.
Hyatt was being booked into the facility on suspicion of domestic violence at the time of the alleged ordeal.
The Conejo Valley woman accuses the law enforcement agency, Sheriff Geoff Dean and deputies involved of causing her “discomfort, humiliation and emotional distress.” The head covering, called a hijab, is used in the Islamic faith to cover certain parts of a woman’s body while in public view so as not to be seen by men who are not members of her immediate family, according to the lawsuit filed in May.
The county states the hijab was not “violently yanked” from Hyatt’s body, as the lawsuit alleges. However, in its response, the county did admit to certain facts, including men being present at times when Hyatt was uncovered. The county also admitted that the head covering was not on her when her booking photo was taken.
“The public existence of this photo continues to haunt Ms. Hyatt,” the lawsuit claims….
FYI says
Have you noticed how many of these stunts seem to involve… female converts to islam?
Camera at the ready,ready to take offense at anything that can be so easily labelled “islamophobic”;CAIR must need the publicity.Some of these new muslims,having adopted an intolerant antisocial religion that preaches hatred to Jews and Christians,even feel free to viciously attack the religious beliefs of others:they have that islamic sense of entitlement to use violence and falsehood.
But of course,they are always the victims at the hands of the infidels.
Have you noticed how many converts to islam end up in Jail?Has CAIR?
what does that say about islam in the western world?
What about the emotional distress caused to victims of islamic terror when their constitutional(and other basic human)rights are denied them?
Susan B says
Why do you think she is a convert? By the way I am sick of these phony stunts by these perpetual victims.
mortimer says
Islamic Victimology 101.
Rule 1: According to Islam, all Muslims are always ‘victims’ and never to be considered ‘perpetrators’, no matter what deed they commit.
mortimer says
Miss Hyatt should read Koran 4.23-24 and decide if she endorses the rape of married captives that is ‘decreed’ here by Allah. Does Hyatt agree that married captives of jihadists may be raped? Yes or no?
Does Miss Hyatt want to remain in a cult that ‘decrees’ genocidal rape? A crime against humanity?
Wellington says
Fine posts, mortimer. Yes, the sanctioning of the rape of non-Muslim women by Islam, this in and of by itself should discredit Islam, all of it, in the eyes of all sensible human beings.
Forget death for apostasy and the establishment of a Jim Crow system based not on race but on belief wherever Islam dominates. Forget also Islam being a mortal enemy of freedom. The sanctioning of rape, this alone should discredit Islam for all time.
But it doesn’t—and therein lies in microcosm “The Problem.” “The Problem” being, as I know you know only too well, that Islam continues to be exculpated for whatever ignorant or stupid reason.
Oh yeah, the games continue, courtesy of ignoramuses like Bush 43, May, Merkel, Francis I, Macron, the EU—-it’s a long and sorry-ass list to be sure. Arguably at the top of this sorry-ass list could be placed Western feminists who overlook the intense misogyny of Islam while excoriating the very civilization, the West, which pioneered far more rights for women than any civilization in history.
Upside-down world. Time for a beer.
gravenimage says
Susan, she almost certainly *is* a convert to Islam–her legal name is Jennifer Hyatt–although I’m sure she’s using some Muslim name now.
Eur says
They are people who need to be the center of attention. Hello!!! I am Muslima, I exist, I do things, I am different, buahhhh nobody loves me and that is why I get into a sect, I need friends and belong to a group.
Arnold Jackson says
It has to be the women.
If a Muslim man would try it the statement would go something like: “They pulled down my pants in front of… oh wait, that was me.”
Nicki Adar says
That is how it SPREADED in Europe. This is a CULT. Any thing that fascinating us is a cult. While u walk in the desert n hear THEIR AZAN CALLING FOR THEIR CHANT. it HYPNOTIZED us. More so while u think it a sweet voice if an innocent woman…. But no no it is a sweet young boy. N MUHAMMAD copied the Christians Coir on that one. Amazing how he mixed a few existing religion in to one CULT. VIOLENT CULT.
Susan B says
Islam does not grow by converts you fools, it grows by using muslim women as breeding cows. Most converts leave after they discover the true islam. There are however millions of muslims converting out of islam and many to Christianity. As muslim become more educated and exposed to better cultures they want to get out the 7th century death cult even when it could mean death.
Ecosse1314 says
Way off topic i know but if ever a face should be covered ( and stay covered) its this slimy bitch of a convert to pislam.
Rarely says
Total agreement. From what I’ve seen I am totally in favour of them totally covering up especially when I’ve just eaten. I hope she enjoyed joining the FGM club.
abad says
They cover up out of guilt and nothing else.
Ren says
Her hijab was “violently yanked” off…
So what?
mccode says
In keeping with the teachings of her ‘faith”, which she proudly proclaims to adhere to, her complaint should be dismissed out of hand since her testimony as a woman is only worth half that of a man.
Too bad, so sad.
revereridesagain says
Yup. Ms. Hyatt is deeply in need of a vacation. In Pakistan. In a bikini. Right outside a nice big mosque on a Friday after prayers. Try taking them to court afterwards, Jennifer. Remember you’ll need 4 MALE witnesses. Oh, and you’ll be in jail for “adultery” in the meantime.
Rarely says
She’d have no problem at all if there was a goat, a sheep or a goldfish there at the same time. Especially if they were dressed in an alluring fashion.
boakai ngombu says
“… This is in order to deflect attention away from jihad terror activity and to buttress the notion that counter-terror scrutiny of Muslim communities is simply more of this persecution. …”
all the more reason to keep the hum of suspicion ongoing. the acts of the muslim (slave) must always serve the allah god of islam (unknowable; the best of all deceivers), which is the enslaver as it works through SHARIA (enslavement tool) to assure SUBJUGATION of the Kafirs.
by the way: C.A.I.R. couldn’t care less about the Kafirs. the organization wishes to assure the abasement of all nonbelievers. the organization does little work for the common good of the greater society
No Muzzies Here says
They have learned well how to milk the system and to obtain more benefits and money from the country that they wake up hating.
somehistory says
Any “photo” of her face should “haunt her.” Ugly isn’t just a word.
How long has she had these deep religious feelings that were so abused by having her photo taken with her hair uncovered?
And why, oh why, did this “peaceful” religion she has adopted not prevent her from engaging in “domestic violence”?
Money, money, whole lot of money….and the warfare to arrange things to prevent moslims from ever, ever, being arrested or challenged or criticized.
Almira says
Hijabs continue to be a symbol of the oppression of women. Muslims counter this view by stating it is a “ choice “ by women to wear as a sign of modesty. If so, it’s the only article of choice that continuously provides Muslim females with an excuse to scream Islamaphobia. Choosing to wear a certain piece of clothing or accessory means that in no way is it required. Nor can the removal of the item cause any injury or damage to the person wearing it. Either it is a requirement of their religion, which would surely make it a symbol of oppression. Or it is not required and the removal of it holds no more meaning than the removal of a coat when entering a warm indoor area. I suspect the indignation Muslims display and promote is only a peep at what the underlying problem is. That problem is that Muslims refuse to abide by or obey any rule whatsoever made by non Muslims . Their refusal is simply a show of their belief of their superiority over any and all non Muslims. If accommodations are made to allow women to “ choose “ to wear the hijab when other non Muslim women would be “required “to remove their coat ,then their superiority will be firmly established . Following this victory more demands will surely follow.
somehistory says
Since she is “Ms.” and does not have a moslim name, it indicates that she is a convert. Legally, it is allowed to ask how long she has been devoted to this idea that she should not go out “uncovered” and while in the presence of men to whom she is unrelated?
These are questions that have been asked in other cases when an arrested person makes a claim based on a religious belief. How long has the claimant been “devoted”?
To what other aspects and rules does she have a history of adherence?
Lynn says
They might also ask how many pictures were taken of her without a hijab and how often she was in the presence of non-related males without hijab before converting to Islam.
somehistory says
Anything she has done since “converting” that is out of line with what she says she believes can and should be revealed in the court case.
If she does *anything* that molims claim a woman should not do, it can and should be used to prove this is just a made up case.
Besides the claim that it was “ripped” off when the county said it was just removed. for security, those other things will bolster the County’s side.
Part of the identification of criminals and those “alleged” to have committed a crime is hair color and length and style. It was necessary to remove the scarf.
Ragdoll says
If she were such a good and pious muslim, she wouldn’t be had up in court for domestic violence…….?? That shows a lot more about her character than her being ashamed of having her photo taken without the slave-rag!
Rosie Barnes says
Interesting: “According to the lawsuit filed in May… the hijab is used in the Islamic faith to cover certain parts of a woman’s body while in public view so as not to be seen by men who are not members of her immediate family”.
In other words, it is an admission that it is less of a religious symbol than a symbol of male dominance and the subjugation of women. Which is why every civilised society from North America through Europe to Japan and China and Australasia find it it culturally offensive.
And just plain WRONG, when women have spent centuries campaigning and working for equality and women’s rights. But not in the Muslim world, which is firmly and irreversibly trapped in the 7th century deserts of Saudi Arabia. And has no place in ours.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Mr spencer, it obvious that Muslims have been suffering from harassments and molestation in the apartheid evil United States, especially under savage mad devil Trump. I watched a video clip showing some thugs trying to rape a Muslim lady while praying. Search YouTube, you will see it.
Expat88 says
So there are 56 other muslim-majority countries that they can immigrate to if life is so hard in America.
Wellington says
People who inhabit glass houses, Ibrahim, should’t throw stones.
All rape is wrong but only Islam sanctions it (per Suras 4, 23, 33 and 70, never mind hadiths describing the warped founder of Islam engaging in said heinous activity).
Islam is for confused or sick people. You come to mind, Ibrahim.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Wellington, you lied. Islam never sanctioned rape and holy Prophet Muhammad never committed rape. But your mithraist churchmen had been doing it after killing all those living with exception of little girls to be kept as sex slaves pursuant to mithraist satanic Bible and now churchm having anus and vaginal sex with kids under their care.
gravenimage says
Well, this is just bizarre–Ibrahim itace muhammed *himself* has said that Muslims may rape Infidels in Jihad and keep them as sex slaves.
And Muhammed raped huge numbers of his victims–he even chided his thuggish “companions” for *not* raping their victims:
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: that while he was sitting with Allah’s Apostle he said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.”
Sahih Bukhari 3:34:432
See–raping them is just fine.
Muhammed himself raped Safiyya of Khayber on the night of the same day he had murdered her husband, father, and brothers.
He also raped Rayhana of Bani Qurayza–Rayhana was of Bani Nadir and was married to a man of Bani Qurayza. When Muhammad commited his genocide of Bani Qurayza, Rayhana was amongst the captive women and children left.
He also raped a sex slave sent to him as a gift–Mary the Copt.
In addition, he raped poor little Aisha, starting when she was just nine-years-old.
In contrast, there is nothing in the Bible that teaches Christians to rape.
gravenimage says
Sure he’s read them, Joe–he just hopes that we haven’t.
gravenimage says
Ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
Mr spencer, it obvious that Muslims have been suffering from harassments and molestation in the apartheid evil United States, especially under savage mad devil Trump.
…………………………
All this story proves is that Muslims are criminals, and engaged in fake victim-mongering “Lawfare”.
More:
I watched a video clip showing some thugs trying to rape a Muslim lady while praying. Search YouTube, you will see it.
…………………………
Ibrahim itace muhammed has been claiming this for years now. But I have never been able to find such a video. Were this rife–as he claims–it would be all over YouTube–but it is not.
MFritz says
You are not “Ibrahim itace muhammed” – he doesn’t post here. HE DOESN’T POST AT ALL. Also, NONE of your postings are coming from Nigeria. And you NEVER talk about Nigerian issues. You are a fraud and a liar. DON’T FEED THE CRIMINAL!
gravenimage says
Actually, he does post on almost all the threads about Nigeria–and he has a Facebook page in both English and Nigerian. Lot of trouble to go through if he were really a non-Muslim Westerner.
Mostly, though, he so often confirms the savagery of Islam.
I think some people just can’t imagine that Muslims can really be so awful–but they are.
Carolyne says
Is he my Nigerian relative who wants to give me a gazillion dollars? All he wants is my bank account number.
gravenimage says
Ha ha! And good to see you posting again, Carolyne.
gravenimage says
California: County denies Muslima’s claim that her hijab was “violently yanked” off as she was booked into jail
…………………
More fake Muslim victim-mongering.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Joe, you ugly monkeys white mithraist christians must leave Americas so that the brothers of the original inhabitants from Indian subcontinent to come and occupy the land. I will come and kick your satan god you call Holy Spirit to track you down and bring you to justice for genocide inspired by Satan god in yahweh and his wife Ashera hero gods. wicked scums of evils!!
WPM says
You Idiot the native Americans were not from the “Indian subcontinent ” ,they came across the Bering strait in the last ice age no where near India. America today is not all white or Christian ,many “native Americans that die with first contact with white men died of diseases that had little or no resistance to. Americans have admitted that they could have treated native Americans better ,we have also done away with slavery over a 140 years ago. Islam is still killing and enslaving people world wide with admitting no fault in its practice of this .Please show were the “Holy Spirt ” condones genocide or any new Testament Bible tests were Genocide ,or slavery is encourages or condoned ,the Koran the Hadiths are full of them ,I do not see you kicking anyone ass you keyboard commando typing in your basement .Bring some facts to the table instead of some rambling nonsense ,Islam has done much genocide to the” Indian subcontinent” as a side note killing millions of Hindus in its march east .
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
wpm, are you blind not be able to read Samuel 15:3 sanctioning genocide, which was carried out by churchmen during crusade wars and in Spain. It was on that basis that white mithraist christians from Europe exterminated the original inhabitants and settled there. wickëd scum of evils inspired by the satan mithraist christians Call Holy Spirit.
Giacomo Latta says
Let me guess. Australia is populated by Austrians with tails. Nickel is mined from the ground in the form of 5-cent pieces. Strawberries are made of straw. Keep on informing us of jewels from your fact drawer, **it*ace!
Carolyne says
Don’t forget the Israeli spy birds which Iran says are taught to spy on them and report back. Why is it that Muslims believe such nonsense?
gravenimage says
What a moron…
James K. says
Hijab=Europe’s burial shroud.
Too bad her Hijab didn’t come with a mouth muzzle.
She needed a good sound paddling: once the board of education comes in contact with the seat of learning, she’ll chant a different tune, that little liar!
And no, she was not unyer duress; Al Taqyya does NOT apply to little Ms. BIGMOUTH.
Ann Marie says
It says in the original police report she stated: “However, there are laws and protocols set in place in this great country — my country — to ensure the safety and protection of everyone’s human and civil rights.”
Honey, if you’re a muslim, this isn’t ‘your country’ since Islam requires you have no allegiance to anything or anyone other than Allah and Mohammed…and islam as a culture is completely opposite to what this country stands for.
Trying to use patriotism and love of country to get to us: another lie put forth by a muslim.
Giacomo Latta says
The poor dear! Did she feel discomfort at having her headgear removed? Just show her a video of a kaffir having his headgear removed, along with his head, and she’ll immediately start to feel warm and fuzzy all over, which is to say, comfort.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Re: “The head covering, called a hijab, is used in the Islamic faith to cover certain parts of a woman’s body while in public view so as not to be seen by men who are not members of her immediate family, according to the lawsuit filed in May.”
THAT’S NOT THE MAIN QUR’ANIC PURPOSE OF COVERING UP!
As usual, they “conveniently” cite the intro, but leave out the second part:
It is a religious mandate in Islam that women be covered up or invite sex attacks:
(Quran 24:31) And tell the believing women to reduce [some] of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which [necessarily] appears thereof, and to wrap their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, [their slaves] or those male attendants having no physical desire, [eunuchs] or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known [by jiggling] what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah in repentance, all of you, O believers, that you might succeed.
If a woman does not cover up, she is fair game to be assaulted:
(Quran 33:59) O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.
From Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 4, Number 148:
Narrated ‘Aisha:
The wives of the Prophet used to go to Al-Manasi, a vast open place (near Baqia at Medina) to answer the call of nature at night. ‘Umar used to say to the Prophet “Let your wives be veiled,” but Allah’s Apostle did not do so. One night Sauda bint Zam’a the wife of the Prophet went out at ‘Isha’ time and she was a tall lady. ‘Umar addressed her and said, “I have recognized you, O Sauda.” He said so, as he desired eagerly that the verses of Al-Hijab (the observing of veils by the Muslim women) may be revealed. So Allah revealed the verses of “Al-Hijab” (A complete body cover excluding the eyes)….!
While any other self-respecting warlord would have had the peeping toms executed for spying on his wives at night, Muhammad agreed with Umar the peeper that they should have to cover up at all times, lest they induce lust in “unsuspecting” muslims, and that’s how the whole burka/hijab notion arose, described in Sura 33:59.
The hijab doesn’t express cultural diversity, so enabling it isn’t an expression of inclusive tolerance.
There’s nothing in islam about it concerning any false “modesty” before god!
Libertine “liberal” criminals never investigate what they support in public, because their motive is always biased slander anyway: they are victim-blaming slanderous masochists, always trying to prevent other people’s presumed racism before it starts. Committing crimes – “pre-emptively defensive” attacks – in advance of others’ presumed attacks, is what these fraudulent virtue-signalling hypocrite criminals are all about.
The Hijab, (or Niqab, or burka) is not a religious duty or fashion trend, it’s only a prison uniform!
AGAIN: as required by sura 24:31:
It’s also a victim-blaming insult to both sexes; from Qur’an Sura 33:59, it is a slanderous statement that implies the muslim men (and all men, just like Muhammad himself allegedly was) are so at the mercy of their hormones, that they must molest and rape any and all women they can see; so it’s always the women’s own fault for not covering up.
It also says the muslim men have a duty to molest and rape all the infidel women for not covering up!
“O Prophet! Tell your wives and daughters and the believing women to draw their cloaks over their bodies. That will be better so that they will be known so as not to be molested. And Allâh is Most Forgiving, Most Merciful.” (Qur’ân 33:59)
So, exactly HOW will they “be known,” in the freedom sack?!
Certainly not as in: “Oh, I know her! Hi, Mary!” – but “known” as muslimas – as members of the gang!
And why is this important? “So as not to be molested!”
Which again implies that muslims DID and always WILL “molest” (i.e: rape,) all the NON-muslim (“infidel”) women!
That it’s the infidel women’s faults, because they don’t cover up, that the muslim men “must” molest (rape) them!
And the Qur’an itself confirms their holy right and duty to rape infidel women.
Muhammad also said women are created by allah as domesticated animals, created for men’s pleasure, and like fields to be tilled at will by men.
So islam is also the “Religion of Rape!”
;-(
Gjallarhornet says
Wow! If that it is true, then it is a big, big … so what? A huge “so what!” Jesus. When I was a youngster police would give you a kick in the ass if you didn’t comply with what they said at once. Never once did we think that we deserved national headlines because of this. You have to be a muslim to have that much self-pity.
Gjallarhornet says
Bottom line: if you cant be in situations that will require that you go without certain religious garbs, passport photos, getting arrested, many jobs, etc, – then don’t go to a country where those situations WILL occur. Much less should you opt to LIVE there. And if you do, and your religious clothing has to come of – for Jesus sake – don’t complain. You came, it’s not muslim country, those are the rules. Q what is the problem? A: There is none.