• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Non-Muslim waiter named “Khalil” falsely claims he got note saying “We don’t tip terrorist”

Jul 24, 2018 1:16 pm By Robert Spencer

As I have noted many times, the Muslim victimhood industry is a big business. It brings you the adoration of the establishment media, financial rewards, and in the Obama era, you might even have scored a visit with the President of the United States. And so now even non-Muslims are getting into the act. Victimhood is such a coveted status these days that we have white people such as Rachel Dolezal and Shaun King posing as black so as to gain the mantle of noble martyr status, and now a non-Muslim who happens to be named Khalil, after a friend of his father, has claimed to have faced hatred as an accused “terrorist.”

What an insane age we live in, which lauds con artists and cowards, and demonizes the genuinely courageous and truthful.

“Waiter who faked ‘racist’ receipt the latest to use shocking claims to get Facebook love,” by Michael Bartiromo, Fox News, July 24, 2018:

You can’t believe everything you read, especially if it’s scrawled across a restaurant receipt.

A waiter at a Saltgrass Steak House in Odessa, Texas, confirmed Monday that he made up a story about one of the restaurant’s patrons leaving him a “racist” receipt.

“I did write it,” Khalil Cavil, 20, told the Odessa American of the note on the receipt, which read “We don’t tip terrorist.”

“I don’t have an explanation,” Cavil said. “I made a mistake. There is no excuse for what I did.”

The COO of the Saltgrass Steak House, where Cavil works, had initially banned the diner from returning to the restaurant, but offered a free meal to the customer upon learning of the hoax.

Cavil originally shared a photo of the receipt to Facebook earlier this month, claiming that a customer wrote the message and refused to leave a gratuity. He further claimed that the patron circled his first name — Khalil — which had been printed at the top of the receipt.

“At the moment I didn’t know what to think nor what to say, I was sick to my stomach,” the 20-year-old had written in the now-deleted Facebook post, explaining that he shared the post to start a discussion about the racism and hatred that “still exists” in the country….

But the Saltgrass Steak House, which had initially defended Cavil and banned the patron from returning to the restaurant, had to apologize and offer the wronged customer a free meal.

“After further investigation, we have learned that our employee fabricated the entire story,” Saltgrass Steak House COO Terry Turney said Monday, in a statement to the Odessa American. “The customer has been contacted and invited back to our restaurant to dine on us.”

Cavil also offered to return tip money that was sent to him by sympathetic Facebook users, who offered up the cash in lieu of the tip he claimed he didn’t receive.

“I’m sorry. I deeply made a huge, big mistake,” Cavil told the Odessa American. “And I’m in the process of getting the help that I need.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: "Islamophobia", claiming victim status, Featured Tagged With: Khalil Cavil


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. George Williams says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 1:32 pm

    The only way to discourage this attempt at causing social chaos is economic capital punishment. The employee should be terminated immediately and the restaurant be made to publisize its mistaken faith at the expense of its customers.

    • SK says

      Jul 24, 2018 at 1:33 pm

      It did terminate him.

      • gravenimage says

        Jul 24, 2018 at 3:37 pm

        SK, I didn’t see anything in the article saying that he was fired.

        • unbeliever1 says

          Jul 24, 2018 at 8:52 pm

          Same here gravenimage. He hasn’t even been suspended.

        • Rob Crawford says

          Jul 25, 2018 at 7:08 am

          Other reporting has the restaurant saying he’s no longer employed by them.

        • gravenimage says

          Jul 27, 2018 at 3:04 am

          Thanks, SK and Rob. I hope you are right.

      • Andy says

        Jul 24, 2018 at 11:08 pm

        Political Islam – The art of deception

        • mortimer says

          Jul 25, 2018 at 3:03 am

          Agree with Andy. ALL Muslims conduct VERBAL JIHAD by concealing and dissembling about the MEANING, MOTIVE and METHODS of jihad.

          ALL Muslims have a duty to conduct jihad and to help the jihad ANY way they can.

          We must assume that ALL Muslims are in favor of jihad against the dirty, disbelieving KUFAAR whom Muslims are required to HATE ‘for the sake of Allah’.

  2. Frank Anderson says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 1:34 pm

    The customer wrongfully accused may have a lot more to claim than a free meal. A discussion with a currently licensed and practicing attorney in Texas could lead to a number of claims for actual damages to reputation, and punitive damages and attorney fees. The establishment may have put itself on the hook by accepting the false story and publishing it. This is probably the only way that frauds like this will stop-when they become more than a “joke” and a free meal.

    • Bill says

      Jul 24, 2018 at 1:53 pm

      I agree and also mentioned that on another thread where this incident was not the main subject. Saltgrass may not have published the customer’s name on the internet but any number of corporate emails, memos, employees and execs at this restaurant chain likely know it. This customer has been libeled and slandered in name somewhere within the restaurant chain’s organization.

      But this is representative of typical leftist/corporate virtue signalling. Before they even bother to conduct a full investigation they proudly proclaim their virtuous progressive anti-Islamophobia credentials.

      I wonder if before launching the virtue signalling attack on the customer, did anyone at Saltgrass look at the zero tip on the receipt and even ask if the lack of the tip might have been for poor customer service?

      I doubt this customer will pursue legal claims he or she may have against Saltgrass. If they already had a bad dining experience, they may just let it be and do, as do most customers, never go back again. That could change perhaps if one of Saltgrass’s noble SJW minions reveals the identity of the customer in a classic SJW revenge move. Then it could be game on.

      As for me, I do visit Texas with some frequency. Usually I like to try new places on each visit and Saltgrass, which I have driven past often, was on the list. Not anymore.

      • Frank Anderson says

        Jul 24, 2018 at 2:04 pm

        I agree that the required element of “publication” of defamatory statements goes far beyond television and newspapers. Texas law could have cases describing internal publication to other personnel as sufficient to support a claim. That is where a local and experienced attorney would be well worth a visit for guidance.

        • Wellington says

          Jul 24, 2018 at 4:51 pm

          Sound legal advice as usual, Frank.

        • Frank Anderson says

          Jul 24, 2018 at 5:06 pm

          Wellington, some people may not understand why I do not use a screen name. By using enough of my actual name nobody can complain with any hope of success to the bars about my comments being outside the rules regarding using false or misleading firm names. Also, I have only 2 things of real value, my health, such as it is, and my reputation, again, such as it is. I have fought hard, and at great cost and sacrifice, to be able to face myself in the mirror. I have passed on opportunities to be downright rich if I had helped steal money. I have walked away from prospective clients who view lawyers and accountants as people who exist to break the law. Everything I write is the same advice I would give a client if we were sitting in the office of the General Counsel of the state bar with a video camera recording. There is no safer way to converse than to state opinions as opinions and to understand that opinions can differ. Bar rules if followed help produce a secure and peaceful life. Thank you for your compliment.

        • George Williams says

          Jul 24, 2018 at 8:47 pm

          Have you met a man called Diogenes yet?

        • Frank Anderson says

          Jul 24, 2018 at 8:52 pm

          Very briefly over 50 years ago in military high school. But I have the honor and pleasure of many friends who are worthy of great trust, honor and respect. I would not be alive today without the many friends who have guided, supported and encouraged me as they have. Each person should be considered alone, not by any generalization.

      • dotherightthing says

        Jul 27, 2018 at 8:18 am

        I also read another thread with the title of the article stating “Christian waiter…..”–how the heck do they know he is Christian?

        • Robert Spencer says

          Jul 27, 2018 at 9:24 am

          He made that clear in his Facebook post claiming victimization, with his references to Christ.

    • Fred says

      Jul 25, 2018 at 4:16 pm

      I never practiced I. Texas, but as I recall from law z hook, back before electricity, the original tortferor is responsible for each repetition of the slander by 3rd parties. But the restaurant may not be off the hook, as they would be the deep pockets and therefore part of the suit.

      • Frank Anderson says

        Jul 26, 2018 at 7:37 am

        At my law school we were taught to sue everybody in sight. Take a look at “joint and several liability”. Also think of a conspiracy theory under civil instead of criminal context. The rule is still according to my research, “The knowledge of one is the knowledge of all. The acts of one are the acts of all.” Getting judgments that only serve to decorate the office wall is sometimes necessary in the pursuit of justice. But bills are paid by collecting money. I can provide a cite on civil conspiracy of needed. That would at least help with key numbers for further research.

  3. Hector Stull says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 1:47 pm

    As a member of the horizontally challenged community, I’d like to get in on the action. Could obesity possibly be considered a race? How does obesophobia” sound? What “obeasism”? Yeah, that’s it! I am a victim of hatred and obeasism. Can I get mainstream media coverage and massive amounts of sympathy? Maybe an appearance on Ellen? ?…

  4. CogitoErgoSum says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 2:04 pm

    He says he made a mistake. No, a mistake is something that is done unintentionally. This man’s actions were deliberate and intentional. What he did was to tell a lie and he is continuing to tell another lie.

    • Frank Anderson says

      Jul 24, 2018 at 2:08 pm

      C.E.S., that is why defamation is an intentional tort giving rise to actual damages, plus punitive damages and attorney fees as allowed by state law. There could also be a federal civil rights claim for denial of service. (public accommodation- See, e.g. Katzenbach v. McClung)

      • boocat says

        Jul 24, 2018 at 5:10 pm

        That’s an excellent point about the denial of service.

      • Rarely says

        Jul 24, 2018 at 6:26 pm

        FA
        Oh the anguish!! Oh the humanity!!! To be erroneously barred from a restaurant!!! How can a reputation so tarnished ever be repaired? Sometimes you take your free steak and laugh it off. A great story to tell at dinner parties unless you really are a cheapskate when it comes to tipping. If so your friends already know it and no harm has been done to your reputation because it isn’t all that great in the first place..
        OTOH if this the type of case that can go before a civil jury in Texas it could be worth megabucks. Everything is larger in Texas. In any event the restaurant’s insurers would likely give a good settlement to avoid the litigation costs.

        • Rarely says

          Jul 24, 2018 at 7:07 pm

          I mean ‘cheapskate bigot’ not just ‘cheapskate’.

        • Frank Anderson says

          Jul 24, 2018 at 7:10 pm

          Rarely I had someone tell a lie about me when I went to accounting school trying to create a way to make a good living without practicing law, That lie coupled with the illegal rules of the American Institute of Certified Accountants combined to force me back into a sustenance practice of law until my health failed. Slander and libel are not jokes. As long as they are treated as jokes they will continue and get worse. Needless to say I and several other lawyers pounded the liar into a wreck with lawsuits that made the last years of tenure miserable and embarrassing. It also served as a terrific training experience that made me in large part what I am today. Liars need to be exposed and taught by whatever harshness is necessary to stop lying. Imagine the pleasure I have had in forcing 5 lawyers to take a witness stand to testify against their lying clients.

        • Rarely says

          Jul 24, 2018 at 8:02 pm

          FA
          I certainly empathize with what you must have gone through and I certainly yield to your legal knowledge in the area. Clearly your courageous action was appropriate.
          In this case, however, I see little to be gained. The restaurant will likely never be fooled again into taking such irresponsible action. The waiter may or may not have learnt a lesson but likely would not have enough assets to even cover the plaintiff’s costs. The entire financial burden would then fall on the restaurant and its insurers either because of its own actions or vicariously.
          If the purpose is to pick up a few bucks I say “go ahead” but otherwise I see a law suit as of little value unless it got big media play. Canadian papers would put the story between the bridge and chess columns. At worst it could cost the plaintiff plenty. Lawyers love it when clients are suing “on principle”.
          What am I missing?

        • Frank Anderson says

          Jul 24, 2018 at 8:28 pm

          Rarely, I believe if you look at many of my comments regarding lawsuits, I usually think they are best approached with care and caution. Especially when the facts are unclear, and damages hard to show. A good example from recent articles without naming names, a host of defamed (slandered and libeled) people and organizations contemplate suing a firm with huge insurance coverage and backing from multiple hundred billion dollar sponsors. This case involves one plaintiff, which therefore translates into a far less attractive opportunity to bankrupt the plaintiff and the law firm representing him with depositions and discovery. The more plaintiffs, the more money and time can be destroyed by defense discovery. I was in a 1983 “conference” of corporate attorneys where this defense tactic was discussed extensively.

          This case has essentially a single plaintiff, obvious fraud, obvious harm to a reputation, a potential civil rights claim and a single defendant, the employer, with money and a second defendant, who is anxious to dump as much as he can on the employer. Both need to be taught a lesson, if Texas law, as seen by a Texas lawyer, will support the claim.

          My antagonist thought I would just go quietly into the night after being accused falsely in front of every member of the accounting faculty of what is described in the law as “slander per se” with one of the professors tape recording the remarks. Under other circumstances I might have. But this was a chance for me to do something other than digging ditches and sweeping floors, which I had been doing before going to accounting school. Taking away that opportunity left me with few options other than to declare war. My antagonist was kept in court more than 3 years through 4 lawsuits, starting with mine over abuse of academic power. That kind of abuse is not likely to happen again. A harsh and expensive lesson was delivered. And 4 lawyers became experienced veterans of some heavy litigation.

          As in most subjects there is room for more than one opinion.

        • Rarely says

          Jul 24, 2018 at 8:25 pm

          Of course I am presuming that the plaintiff didn’t suffer much (if any) loss by this fiasco. It’s a bit of a stretch to imagine that he did.

        • Frank Anderson says

          Jul 24, 2018 at 8:41 pm

          There are many defamatory statements that qualify as “slander per se”. In some states (not sure about Texas) actual damages are presumed. In addition in some states, both punitive damages and plaintiff’s attorney fees can be awarded in addition to court costs and expenses. Automatically trivializing the injury could be an error. If 1 dollar of actual damages is allowed, any amount of punitive damages could follow as allowed by state law. And attorney fees could be very high based on the machinations of the defense. Letting an experienced Texas lawyer look at this case is probably worth the time and a reasonable consultation fee.

        • Rarely says

          Jul 25, 2018 at 12:13 am

          Hi FA
          I do understand the necessity of your law suit and admire your determination in following it all the way through.
          Clearly things are quite a bit different in Canada than the US. In my day (I did practice civil litigation for a time) a case like this would rarely, if ever, see the inside of a court room unless significant damage had been done to the plaintiff’s reputation and not just a minor embarrassment..Similarly there were such severe penalties for pleading fraud and not proving it (5 times costs in any event) that pleading fraud was only done in the most clear cut of cases.
          If the media or Human Rights Council wouldn’t touch it you were basically SOL.
          You can now see why I suggested accepting the apology and free dinner and go on about his life.
          I do put the same caveat on my remarks that you did on yours and that is if anyone is curious about their rights, the legitimacy of their complaint or feel that they have been unfairly harmed in any way they should consult a lawyer licenced in the appropriate jurisdiction who is qualified to give an opinion. The local Bar Association will gladly give you a list of names to chose from.

        • Frank Anderson says

          Jul 25, 2018 at 12:40 am

          We agree.

      • Fred says

        Jul 25, 2018 at 4:24 pm

        My baliwick was criminal law. Frank, how does actual malice play in this? I realize the restaurant is not media, probably won’t benefit from the New York Times case, which I disagree with, but I’m not SCOTUS so no one cares.

        • Frank Anderson says

          Jul 26, 2018 at 7:30 am

          In the civil tort claim for making a false statement intending that statement to cause reliance, actually causing reliance and injury resulting from that reliance, I believe all the elements of fraud are stated in addition to defamation (slander-spoken, libel-written). New York Times malice, arising from New York Times v. Sullivan a US Supreme Court case arising in Alabama in 1964, requires that for a “public figure” to recover for defamation, the publication must be made with “knowledge of the falsity or reckless disregard for the truth”. IN MY OPINION, as is most of what I write, a person who is not a “public figure” does not *need* to establish actual malice; but to the extent such malice or motive is shown it should increase the damage award. It has been right at 38 years since I passed 2 bar exams. I may have forgotten something, which is why consulting a currently licensed and practicing attorney is important, especially one who spends time on this area.

    • mariam rove says

      Jul 24, 2018 at 4:08 pm

      You have a great point indeed. M

    • CogitoErgoSum says

      Jul 24, 2018 at 4:44 pm

      The only way I see that he can get out of continuing with his lying is if he says this: “I made a mistake …. which was thinking I could do this without getting caught.”

      So the mistake he made was getting caught because he didn’t intend for that to happen ….. but he doesn’t want to admit that and he doesn’t want anyone else to think it.

  5. somehistory says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 2:22 pm

    This was on the news a few days ago, and at that time, the name of the waiter/liar was not revealed.

    But, it had all of the earmarks of a hoax. a lie…these are getting ever easier to identify before those who can, investigate. and prove the truth.
    How many times will they happen before the average person can spot them as hoaxes…lies? There have been way too many l lies …hoaxes….told already.

  6. DHazard says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 2:47 pm

    People like this are sometimes called “allies”. But really, Muslims don’t need any help faking hate crimes. And it doesn’t even come close to the “bomb” clock from a couple years ago. But that was probably a family project.

    • Indiana Tom says

      Jul 24, 2018 at 7:14 pm

      Community project?

  7. gravenimage says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 3:32 pm

    Non-Muslim waiter named “Khalil” falsely claims he got note saying “We don’t tip terrorist”
    ……………………..

    I suppose this idiot did this for attention–and possibly money.

    But what he was *really* aiding in his calumny against an innocent customer is that Westerners will be less likely to follow their instincts when someone *really does* appear to be suspicious–because they will be too scared of appearing “racist” or “Islamophobic”.

    • Wellington says

      Jul 24, 2018 at 4:54 pm

      A very valid point, gravenimage.

    • somehistory says

      Jul 24, 2018 at 9:57 pm

      g,

      When i first saw this on the news, it occurred to me that in the present climate of everything being subject to the charge of offending somebody, and the accusations and demands for apologies that are rampant, most people who might wish to write something would be too afraid to.

      The reaction from the public…many giving him money, the customer banned from the restaurant, charges of “racism”…though race has nothing to do with the *message* he wrote…all point to the fact that anything anyone says will be a target for condemnation.

      The average person doesn’t want to bring that on himself/herself. Especially if it might concern moslims or islam. That is the main reason I thought it was a lie perpetrated by the employee.
      Evidently, he thought he should get a tip, but perhaps the customer didn’t think he deserved one. Sounds like payback.

      And, of course, what you point out is true.

      • gravenimage says

        Jul 27, 2018 at 3:07 am

        Could be, Somehistory.

  8. mgoldberg says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 4:36 pm

    Best punishment: five yrs, no social networking at all. The guy will go nuts and need professional help
    for his withdrawal.

  9. Axolotl says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 4:57 pm

    Seems Khalil, a black guy, is a bit of publicity whore.
    The original story (before he was busted) is here.
    https://www.oaoa.com/news/local/article_f6b1f89a-8941-11e8-a62c-b36bd18d5067.html
    Even a judge, who really should know better, got in on the act.
    “The ignorance of these people cannot even be charted,” wrote one commenter, County Court at Law Judge Chris Clark. “He’s a terrorist because his name is Khalil?! Are you SERIOUS??? You doubtless didn’t know, and still don’t know, who this person is. How in the world could you openly make an extreme judgment like that without knowing ANYTHING about that person? I’ll tell you how…. because you’re ignorant, classless, racist, mindless fools.”
    This is the best bit “… he (Khalil) has studied at Odessa College before applying to Dallas Baptist, where he will study the Bible and theology.”!

  10. boocat says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 5:07 pm

    I love this! They are so gullible they couldn’t see the waiter had written this illiterate note himself. Ruined the customer’s reputation, after he’d spent a hundred bucks on a meal there! Now these horrible people offer him A FREE MEAL! What gall! Maybe free meals for life for him and a full page ad in the local newspaper apologizing to the poor abused customer. This offer is a joke; it’s insult upon injury. I think I’d hire a really good attorney and sue them.

    Doesn’t getting money for a fake story constitute fraud?

    • Rarely says

      Jul 24, 2018 at 6:31 pm

      No one died. No one lost an arm.
      An idiot did an idiot thing. Take the free steak, accept the apology and move on.

  11. Politicianophobia says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 5:46 pm

    Well in this crazy, hate filled, world, I must admit, I love Frank Anderson. He is a treasure.

    • gravenimage says

      Jul 24, 2018 at 6:06 pm

      +1

      • Frank Anderson says

        Jul 24, 2018 at 6:36 pm

        Pol. . . and GI, I am honored. Thank you. I will do my best to earn it and keep it that way. There is a lot of room for all of us to think, and then find ways to act. Jewish teaching in which I find great merit: “Pray (hard) as though everything depends of God; Act as though everything depends on us.” All the thought and discussion in the world will not save civilization. Spend some time looking at Germany, Italy and Spain before WWII. What can we do that they missed when they could?

        • gravenimage says

          Jul 24, 2018 at 6:40 pm

          Thank you, Frank.

          And you are right–the West has often been slow to recognize threats. It springs from us thinking the best of people–but it can put us in terrible danger.

        • Indiana Tom says

          Jul 24, 2018 at 7:18 pm

          Spend some time looking at Germany, Italy and Spain before WWII. What can we do that they missed when they could?
          Gee….maybe we should look at Germany, Italy and Spain now. What can we do that they missed when they could?

        • Frank Anderson says

          Jul 24, 2018 at 7:36 pm

          I.T. that is the point. “Those who cannot remember the lessons of the past are condemned to repeat them.” Jorge Santayana, The Life of Reason (1905). There is not teaching value unless history is part of the decisions of today. And we seem to be flooded with people who don’t want to learn or remember. But you, GI, and a lot of other people are probably not in that group. “It” is “out there” if “we” will just look and think.

        • gravenimage says

          Jul 27, 2018 at 3:10 am

          True, Indiana Tom and Frank. I am just now rereading a fine book called “Hitlerland” (terrible title, great book) about how slow people–including many Western diplomats and journalists stationed in Germany–were to wake up to the Nazi threat before WWII.

  12. FYI says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 6:05 pm

    I’m not sure but I might have received a false note too.

    “Filtee amrikan mithraist chreesten bastages with taalking dove speakin holy spirit satans evil scums.wallahu wackbar wallaahu wackbar”

    signed Mo

    • gravenimage says

      Jul 24, 2018 at 6:09 pm

      Ha ha!

    • Peter says

      Jul 24, 2018 at 6:28 pm

      Ha ha ha
      That’s far more articulate than his usual babble

      • Rarely says

        Jul 24, 2018 at 8:28 pm

        Right. It’s a fraud. Ibrahim is NEVER that clear.

  13. Peter says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 6:23 pm

    Purely a wandering thought……
    Now a lot of local stores are going to take a huge hit in sales.
    Pre- ordered items such as: baseball bats, tire irons, glass bottles, petrol, megaphones, etc will now have to be cancelled due to the likes of basket cases Antifa and co. calling off their planned response.
    Oh well never mind, I heard someone in Stanford U. just had a conservative opinion of their OWN (gasp).
    So they can head on over there and throw on of their “parties”.
    F’n creeps.

  14. Indiana Tom says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 7:11 pm

    But the Saltgrass Steak House, which had initially defended Cavil and banned the patron from returning to the restaurant, had to apologize and offer the wronged customer a free meal.
    If I was the customer I would tell the Saltgrass Steak House to go to hell.
    I guess the waiter is still employed, so I guess the Saltgrass Steak House is still supporting him.
    Sounds like the Saltgrass steak House is a good place not to patronize.

  15. William Bradley says

    Jul 24, 2018 at 9:39 pm

    As of July 25th this is still prominently listed on the CAIR website as if it actually happened.

  16. mortimer says

    Jul 25, 2018 at 3:07 am

    Forensic handwriting analysis can tell instantly the source of handwriting.

    Even the smallest, idiosyncratic tremor can give the writer away, since no one else can write that way.

    Most people do not know that their handwriting is unique even when they are trying to imitate someone else’s hand and that a proficient analyst can quickly expose them.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • gravenimage on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Lion heart on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Graham Bryant on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • Sabri S. on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Hoi Polloi on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.