Aside from Hussain’s flimsy explanations, why does this keep happening?
Sexual assault occurs in all cultures, but only in Islam does it have divine sanction.
One survivor of a Muslim rape gang in the UK said that her rapists would quote Quran to her, and believed their actions justified by Islam.
The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
“Firearms officer on trial over sexual assault of 17-year-old girl tells court he turned her down,” by Rod Malcolm, Nottingham Post, July 20, 2018:
A police firearms officer told a jury that a teenage girl accuser tried to have sex but he turned her down.
The 17-year-old was one of three females who got into PC Majud Hussain’s car late one night after he finished a shift, a court heard.
The first mistakenly thought he was a cabbie waiting outside a night club in Long Eaton. She was dropped off near her home after giving her mobile phone number.
Later father-of-four Hussain came across girls aged 14 and 17. He took the pair to McDonald’s before dropping the younger one at home and speaking briefly to her mother around 3.30am on July 16 last year.
He denies four charges of sexual assault of the 17-year-old who had remained in the car owned by Hussain, of Nottingham.
The Leicestershire Police officer told Nottingham Crown Court: “She repeatedly asked me why I didn’t have sex with her and why I stopped. I kept telling her it doesn’t matter but she repeatedly asked me over and over again.”
They had some contact and the girl used her mobile phone to record a conversation with Hussain, 40. Part of this included him saying: “I looked up at your face and I could tell you were not enjoying it so for that reason I stopped.”
Martin Elwick, defending, asked: “Was that the truth?”
Hussain replied: “No, it was not.” He told the jury that he did not want sex with the girl because he had earlier been intimate with a woman. He said that he told the 17-year-old he was “not in the mood”.
“She said ‘oh, same here.’ That took me by surprise,” he told the court.
Mr Elwick asked why he had used that reason and Hussain said he did not want her “to feel embarrassed about it, so she doesn’t feel bad”.
Rebecca Herbert, prosecuting, described him as “a sexual predator” who drove around late at night and parked outside a night club. He said that was where he had previously met a woman after contact on an internet dating website.
Miss Herbert asked: “Can you show us your secret? The jury may be wondering what exactly it is about you which sends girls so wild.”
According to his account, she said, they were keen to strip and perform sex acts.
He replied: “I don’t know how to answer that. That is not how it happened.”
At the opening of the trial, the jury was told that he called himself Matt and said he was a fireman, rather than giving his real name and occupation.
He said that he was known as “Maj” but that some people call him Matt. And he told the jury that when joining the police force, he had been advised against telling people about his job….