“I will also be asking my Anti-Muslim hate crime and Anti-Semitism roundtables to identify what more we can do to stamp out hate crime,” says Home Secretary Sajid Javid.
Unfortunately, honest analysis of how jihadis use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and make recruits among peaceful Muslims is generally included among “anti-Muslim hate crimes.” So this will lead to more clampdowns on the freedom of speech in Sajid Javid’s shabby little police state.
“UK Announces Police Cash Boost… for Soros-Backed ‘Hate Crime’ Training,” by Virginia Hale, Breitbart, July 10, 2018 (thanks to Inexion):
Unveiling plans to step up its war on “hate speech”, the Home Office has promised a police cash boost to give call handlers “specialist training” developed partly by a George Soros-backed NGO on how to give people reporting so-called hate crime “the vital support they need”.
“The programme will help call handlers to effectively identify if a hate crime has been committed and provide a professional and empathetic response for people who may have suffered personal abuse,” according to the ministry’s website.
Police Oracle reports that £20,000 of taxpayers’ money will be spent on training delivered by the National Police Chiefs’ Council in partnership with Facing All The Facts, an organisation funded by globalist billionaire George Soros which works with social media companies like Google along with law enforcement agencies across Europe to monitor and fight “hate”.
“It is part of the government’s crucial work to tackle all forms of hate crime, support victims and protect the vulnerable from this horrific abuse,” the Home Office said.
Later this year, the government will release an updated Hate Crime Action Plan outlining further measures the state intends to take to tackle “the five hate crime strands – race, religion, sexual orientation, disability and transgender identities”.
The action plan, the first version of which was published shortly after the Brexit vote in summer 2016, defines success as maximising the number of “hate” incidents reported by members of the public, instructing police and various monitoring agencies to actively solicit complaints.
Sajid Javid said: “Hate crimes are totally unacceptable and have no place in British society. I understand the fear, anguish and anger they can cause.
“Those who have the courage to report these vile crimes deserve as much support as possible. That is why we have provided funding to give police call handlers expert training to spot the signs and respond compassionately.
“I will also be asking my Anti-Muslim hate crime and Anti-Semitism roundtables to identify what more we can do to stamp out hate crime,” the newly-installed Home Secretary said.
Announcing their expansion, the Home Office said that the previous work of ‘hate crime’ roundtables includes the creation of a “guide to moderate online hate content” and a “guide to support hate crime victims”.
It also highlighted “ongoing collaboration between the Anti-Muslim Hatred Working Group and IPSO (Independent Press Standards Organisation)” in the aid of ensuring “sensitive reporting” around issues relating to state-designated victim groups.
While the number of arrests in Britain has fallen dramatically in recent years, despite large increases in recorded crime, arrests over “hateful” comments posted online have risen by as much as 877 percent in some parts of England.
With dedicated “hate crime coordinators” in place across the country, police dedication to driving up the number of so-called hate crime reports is such that forces in the northwest of England held a weeklong campaign out of concern that officers “see a reduction in reports of hate crime at this time of year”….
Cicero says
The U.K. infrastructure is riddled with Islamists. So this development is no surprise !!!!!
Why only collaborate with the anti Muslim hatred working group.? Why stop there ?
Where are the Anti Jew hatred working group : the anti Sikh hatred working group: the anti Buddhist working group? And why are the authorities not seeking them out and working with them to protect them from the venom, harassment and low level aggression emanating towards them wherever Muslims Number more than one ?
VRWC member77 says
…..”Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime”……. —Skip J. Stalin. What’s the difference:
**** The action plan, the first version of which was published shortly after the Brexit vote in summer 2016, defines success as maximising the number of “hate” incidents reported by members of the public, instructing police and various monitoring agencies to actively solicit complaints. ****
I’d like to know what will happen to this putrid, fetid monster called teresa may in five years when Britain will either be violently extracting itself from this societal debacle or decaying in Stage 3 Jihad.
Andy says
Giant Sadiq Khan ‘baby balloon to fly over London
https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/giant-sadiq-khan-baby-balloon-to-fly-over-london/
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Nice. I’d pay to see that happen.
thesailor says
I think your first sentence answered your last.
Jack says
isn’t Islam and its ‘values’ the very definition of Hate Crime?
Andy says
Brexit Sellout
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4YAvGJ8Kmk
Guy Forester says
I hate to tell you this, that no matter who runs or who the Brits vote for, you just get another political hack from the same cookie cutter mold.
Unless there is an overwhelming turnout of voters that cannot be masked by the BBC and the phoney vote counters for the elites, you will just get more of the same. The only reason that the US got Trump is that the turnout was too large to cover up.
Stacy Girl says
Isn’t it a miracle that Donald Trump was elected? With the massive effort of the govt employed leftists, the media, and 40% of the US being insane, what a victory.
Andy says
God Bless President Trump!!! Countries need leaders like Trump in this day and age of Terrorism we live in.
Common Sense leadership is what is needed now, more than ever!
Andy says
London’s Anti-Trump Balloon Upstaged by Anti-Sadiq Khan Balloon That Raises More Money
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSFm3eZTZaI
Trump supporters heckle London’s Mayor Sadiq Khan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJS9VgR4flI
David M says
I seriously think God stopped Hillary Clinton from becoming President, working through certain people of course.
Andy says
+1
AMEN
Andy says
Canada also has a problem with the elites, globalist Trudeau.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcL6LDlBfSY
Canadians need to get the numbers out in 2019 to get TRUDEAU and LIBERALS OUT!!!
Border Crisis anywhere where liberals are in power.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Bi3ineBMtw
John Forbes says
There is no chance that JUSTIN will stop the illegal flow! After all, they will be his voter base & he can practice Poetry & Dress Ups!
Should all be well received!!
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Nice satire. And yes the Canadian MSM are outer space aliens who want to dominate us.
gravenimage says
Boris Johnson is pretty good. How can you say he is no different from Theresa May or Jeremy Corbyn?
Brian hoff says
trump and his brownshirt support are haveing than hard time doing anything. trump cannot do anything right. My idear it ice agent do anything to enforce trump anti immigration polcy the america people have the constitution right to knick those agent in the ass realy hard.
David M says
Watch out Brian, I’ve heard ICE are going to deport you back to some Islamic shit hole country very soon.
gravenimage says
This is “Brian hoff’s”–really, “DefenderofIslam’s”–understanding of the Constitution–that Muslims have the right to assault those who are acting to protect us against Jihad.
No–the Constitution is not for the purpose of turning us into another Islamic hell hole.
Guy Forester says
This is straight out of a George Orwell novel.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Even after he made billions by shorting their currency and weakening their economy. Wow.
R Russell says
I notice Christians are missed out as usual. Christianity – the most persecuted religion in the world.
Andy says
+1
Lydia Church says
As always, in true liberal fashion!
And as I was saying earlier, it’s just more of the brainwashing tactics of propaganda at work!
“Later this year, the government will release an updated Hate Crime Action Plan outlining further measures the state intends to take to tackle “the five hate crime strands – race, religion, sexual orientation, disability and transgender identities”.”
Disability? When do we ever see that being addressed? By ‘race’ they most likely mean ‘muslims’!
This is all about muslims and sodomy and not only ‘protecting’ them, but persecuting those who speak out against any of this. They’re not interested in protecting persecuted Christians, they’re interested in persecuting us further! Yup, it fits the script exactly. And all these plots conform to that ‘poor me the victim’ narrative, no matter where the border is they want to erase.
thesailor says
I think “disability” applies to Muslims, does it not?
J D S says
The real religion of peace …..Christianity.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Hopefully Sajid Javid will go down with May when her government fails.
overman says
He’s already giving the ISIS salute.
DHazard says
Hating is not a crime. It doesn’t matter who you hate, how much you hate them, or how you express it; hate never amounts to more than feelings. So the only legitimate legal argument is nebulous; someone’s speech may lead others to hurt some people, or at least contribute to an environment that fosters violence. It doesn’t, the hate was already there. So then it comes down to whether the hatred is justified. Hatred of Islam is justified. So there are no “crimes” to investigate where Islam is the target of the hatred.
Threats are different and I am sure Muslims are disproportionately represented when it comes to posting torture and death threats. I am also certain that in the UK Muslims are disproportionately NOT charged for issuing such threats. And when they are caught the sentence is more lenient.
Besides, I WANT to know what other people are thinking. Moving hatred underground always makes things worse.
Ric says
Britain is no longer a Parliamentary Democracy; P.M. May has surreptitiously stripped Freedom of Speech and thought from the Constitution regarding the non-Muslim citizenry. It began with political correctness, daring to joke about obesity, Gayness, and so forth. Now the big enchilada is daring to criticize Islam, not threatening, not uttering death threats or violence but merely expressing one’s opinion of the Religion of Peace. May’s Gestapo spends more man hours and money on seeking Islamophobes than those Muslims bent on murdering and maiming the said citizenry.
It is the old double-standard; Muslims are immune to prosecution for alleged hate-crimes. England is going the way of the Dodo by its doing.
thesailor says
I actually don’t see why people shouldn’t hate something if they want to. It is entirely a matter for them and their conscience, not the Government. The best organisation for helping them deal with it is their compatriots, not their oppressors.
gravenimage says
And hating evil–like Fascism–is actually a good and decent thing.
David M says
When I grew up it was always “sticks and stones will break my bones, but names will never hurt me.” We should have stayed with that.
Wellington says
Any hate crime legislation is way off the mark because it punishes motive, which is important for criminal investigative purposes but should in no way be a factor where sentencing is concerned. For instance, what difference does it make for reasons of punishment if a person is severely beaten up because they are gay, Muslim, Christian, Jewish, female, a Trump supporter or because they wore an opposing sports team jersey? The person was beaten up in any case and the guilty party should be punished, if convicted after a fair trial, irrespective of motive. Taking motive into account is an example of that great error, i.e., social engineering, and makes a mockery of justice when someone who beat up a person for their money is given a lesser sentence than someone who beat up a person because they were gay. The action, not the motive, is all that matters for justice to be what it should be, i.e., blind.
Second point: Making a distinction between free speech and hate speech is a route by which free speech is greatly endangered. It is an Orwellian distinction and is both wrong and stupid.
FYI says
If Sajid Javid wants to tackle “hate speech”…..he should start with the koran.
Perhaps the British police can start by investigating allah’s hate speech in his violently anti-Semitic,antichristian “holy” book.
thesailor says
” defines success as maximising the number of “hate” incidents reported by members of the public, instructing police and various monitoring agencies to actively solicit complaints.”
I wonder what Sir Robert Peel would make of that? I wouldn’t want to be walking past his grave late at night.
Barry Sommer says
I wonder how the May government would react if thousands of people contacted these anti-hate units and started complaining about anti-semitism coming from Muslims and Islam. Would they jump to act or turn a blind eye as with the rape gangs? I think we know the answer. Rampant Islamophobia will be the claim, with stricter controls on “hate speech” against the poor, oppressed Muslim.
gravenimage says
+1
Georg says
What a sickening farce.
penelope says
soros and ofa (obama) are dead set on destroying everything to lead to one world order. soros funds over 250 front terrorist groups in America, one of them being OFA (obama) group to undermine and try to destroy President Trump’s administration. Soros paid for obama all the way; another reason the democrats will never wake up; being paid off very generously especially Clinton. Thankfully those who love America stepped up to elect President Trump.
penelope says
OFA and Islam are parallel organizations dead set on destroying everything they are associated with while blaming islamophobia on their issues when they themselves created the term islamophobia to cover their own dastardly deeds. We see through ofa and islam which should both be monitored very closely and shut down wherever they land.
Halal Bacon says
Best comments yet…
https://twitter.com/TuffsLiam/status/1016759215443140623
No Muzzies Here says
If only they had that much enthusiasm to stamp out rape and murder committed by their new masters. Perhaps it’s because their real intention is to give their new masters full permission to rape and murder.
holmsey says
I am a great believer of what goes around comes around sooner or later things will go back to normal
gravenimage says
Only if fight for our values. The triumph of the good is *not* automatic.
Older Canadian says
Just $26,500. Must let Trudeau know. Us canadian taxpayers would appreciate the savings.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Here – I’ll do it for them gratis:
The Truth Hurts – liars.
Ans so then, being liars, they will habitually double-down and proclaim that No, it REALLy hurts!
It EXTRA-Hurts! And it super-duper really, REALLy extra-“offensively” hurts their precious feewings, too!
So, their definition of “Hate” crimes is really only about “HURT” crimes – CAPISCE?!
“Hate crimes” are really only *thought*-crimes, which is a victim-blaming slanderous assertion made by criminals to deflect everyone’s attention away from their own crimes (since criminals are psycho-paths who hate thinking, of course to them) by asserting that anyone merely considering or feeling that one should dislike something bad – aka crime and criminals – should be accused of committing the only “illegal crime” in itself!
Since rational people get angry with criminals for their predatory choices, and criminals always insist they have no choices because we’re all equally victims who should therefore tolerate the diverse differences between the kind of victim who attacks innocent others first, and those who don’t, they assert pity is always good and anger is always bad.
So, since criminals expect that all is generally allowed unless and until it is very specifically disallowed in advance, to them the only real crime is trying to prevent them from doing whatever they want to do, to whomever they want to do it to, and whenever they want to do it. Such attempts are always seen by them as “mean!” or more recently, “HATEFUL!”
The whole notion of “hate-speech” and “hate-crimes” IS a crime! Having “hate” isn’t a criminal act or a “sin” or even somehow a moral failing; it’s EITHER the perfectly natural and neutral human response to ongoing injustices, OR it’s a victim-blaming slanderous HABIT; but either way, it’s only an effect, and not a cause of anything. Those who try to make “hate crimes” illegal, only end up making it illegal to hate crimes!
Well, I proudly admit that Yes I DO hate crimes and the criminals who commit them; so what?!
To leftopaths, being angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow victims,” is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!
Having no facts, logic, or reasonable arguments with which to defend their own crimes and treason, they must in stead substitute this global attempt to control our very thinking – through an emotional, sub-conscious “narrative” – so much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:
“Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”
Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!
BUT IN REALITY, The Truth Hurts – liars.
Ans so then, being liars, they will habitually double-down and proclaim that No, it REALLy hurts!
It EXTRA-Hurts! And it super-duper really, REALLy extra-“offensively” hurts their precious feewings, too!
…….
“Hate” crimes are really only “HURT” crimes – CAPISCE?!
…….
“Hate crimes” are really only *thought*-crimes, which is a victim-blaming slanderous assertion made by criminals to deflect everyone’s attention away from their own crimes (since criminals are psycho-paths who hate thinking, of course to them) by asserting that anyone merely considering or feeling that one should dislike something bad – aka crime and criminals – should be accused of committing the only “illegal crime” in itself!
…….
Since rational people get angry with criminals for their predatory choices, and criminals always insist they have no choices because we’re all equally victims who should therefore tolerate the diverse differences between the kind of victim who attacks innocent others first, and those who don’t, they assert pity is always good and anger is always bad.
So, since criminals expect that all is generally allowed unless and until it is very specifically disallowed in advance, to them the only real crime is trying to prevent them from doing whatever they want to do, to whomever they want to do it to, and whenever they want to do it. Such attempts are always seen by them as “mean!” or more recently, “HATEFUL!”
The whole notion of “hate-speech” and “hate-crimes” IS a crime! Having “hate” isn’t a criminal act or a “sin” or even somehow a moral failing; it’s EITHER the perfectly natural and neutral human response to ongoing injustices, OR it’s a victim-blaming slanderous HABIT; but either way, it’s only an effect, and not a cause of anything. Those who try to make “hate crimes” illegal, only end up making it illegal to hate crimes!
Well, I proudly admit that Yes I DO hate crimes and the criminals who commit them; so what?!
These days, the truth needs official protection!
In all these new “hate-crimes laws” it’s illegal to hate crimes and the criminal who commit them.
They supposedly “replace” our basic anti-slander laws, which had the defense of the Truth (it’s not slander if it’s true) and where real, actual (not hypothetical) damages had to be proven in court!
These days, you’re slanderoulsy pre-judged as “Guilty Until (Never) Proven Innocent!” BY the government courts, and if you even only *might* hurt some criminal’s feelings by accusing them of their crimes, and those silly facts that what you’re saying is true, no longer apply!
Well, I DO hate crimes and the criminals that commit them – don’t you?
Hate is only the perfectly natural human response of perpetual anger towards ongoing injustices (like islam); without hate, nobody’d ever even bother to accuse any criminals of their crimes, and so hope to end those crimes.
In fact, liberals today try to pretend there’s no such things as crime and criminals, because we’re all really only victims anyway!
They’d make it “illegal” to accuse any criminals of their crimes, if doing so might hurt their feelings, and so “make” them commit even more crimes!
But when they try to make “hate crimes” illegal, they really only ever end up making it illegal to hate crimes!
😉