Despite this compelling evidence of dishonesty, Ilhan Omar will almost certainly be elected to Congress: voting against her would be “Islamophobic.”
“State Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) Swore to Apparent Falsehoods in Court — While Divorcing Her Alleged Brother,” by David Steinberg, PJ Media, August 8, 2018:
Minnesota state Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-60B) is the presumed frontrunner for the MN-5 House seat being vacated by Rep. Keith Ellison (D). The seat is safely Democratic; Hollywood progressives, local party officials, and Minnesota media have all but scheduled the August 14 primary as her coronation. Their enthusiasm is rooted in Omar’s identity: she is a photogenic, hijab-wearing Muslim who entered the United States as a Somali child refugee.
Likely because of this, however, Omar’s media and party supporters have been aggressively uninterested in a disturbing allegation about Omar with legal ramifications: that in 2009, she seems to have married her brother. That allegation has been public for nearly two years without Omar addressing its specific foundations.
Newly uncovered evidence — exclusively published below — adds another allegation: Ilhan Omar has since signed off on apparent falsehoods, under penalty of perjury, during her 2017 divorce from the man in question: Ahmed Nur Said Elmi.
——————————
New Evidence, New Allegations
Minnesota law deems court records of divorce proceedings to be available to the public. In 2017, several months after Omar’s marriage history briefly created a national news item, Omar quietly petitioned family court for a default divorce, claiming she could not locate Elmi.
The above document depicts Omar, under penalty of perjury, attesting to the court that she has not had contact with her legal husband since June 2011.
To those familiar with the 2016 coverage of this story, this claim should strike as a jaw-dropper. (Ed. note: scroll down below for a summary of the Ilhan Omar backstory.)
To reference just one example, the three immediately following photos were pivotal elements of the 2016 coverage. These pictures first appeared on Ilhan Omar’s personal Instagram account in 2014 (her username at the time was “hameey”), and depict Ilhan visiting Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in London that year.
In contrast to Omar’s attestation of zero contact since 2011, two of Omar’s three self-published photos here actually appear to show physical contact some three years later:
There are many other examples of consistent social media communication — comments, likes — between the two since June 2011.
When confronted with the above pictures in 2016, UK resident Ahmed N. Elmi admitted to a reporter that he was indeed the scarved man in the three pictures. However, he also claimed to not know the name of the woman in the colorful head covering adjacent to him, and that she certainly was not his legal wife. He then gave the reporter a different birthdate for himself than the April 4, 1985, birthdate given for Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in Omar’s divorce petition.
In short, he claimed to simply be a different Ahmed N. Elmi, who coincidentally happened to get photographed with Ilhan Omar at a London event.
As with Ilhan’s self-published photos, this newly discovered post from Elmi’s confirmed Instagram account contradicts his claim:
On October 20, 2013, Elmi posted the above photos of himself in the hospital following minor surgery.
Clearly, his hospital intake bracelet identifies his date of birth to be April 4, 1985.
While other men named Ahmed Elmi have lived in the U.S. and London, there simply are no records to be found of another one sharing the exact birthdate as the Ahmed Nur Said Elmi whom Ilhan Omar divorced. Of course, this Ahmed Elmi has also been photographed with Ilhan Omar, and regularly communicated with her on social media.
Piling on, note that a second known Instagram account belonging to Ilhan Omar, “ilhanmn,” commented on the above post in 2013.
Her comment indicates that she knew how to reach Elmi by phone years after June 2011, another strike against her sworn claims.
More New Evidence Suggests a Troubling Motive
Why might Omar apparently risk her political career and serious legal exposure by attesting to that easily challenged “June 2011” claim? Could it credibly be faulted to an honest, if severe, mistake?
Another document from Omar’s 2017 divorce proceedings suggests a more compelling, if speculative, motivation:
The above document contains extraordinary information.
First, Ilhan attests that there are no children born “of” her marriage to Ahmed Elmi, but that one of her children was born “during” that marriage. A yellow box notes that the document “has been updated since signed,” and an initialed note contains the update:
The Respondent [Ahmed Nur Said Elmi] has not signed a declaration of non-paternity as the Petitioner [Ilhan Omar] has had no contact with him since before the child was conceived.
In 2016, Ilhan told the press that her 2009 marriage to Ahmed Elmi was essentially a two-year hiatus from her relationship with Ahmed Hirsi, the legal father of all three of her children. She claimed to have separated from Hirsi, then met and married Elmi, a relationship which failed permanently sometime around June 2011, and then rekindled with Hirsi and had a third child.
Ilhan is filing for default divorce here. I cannot imagine that a judge would grant a divorce without Elmi even being served if the paternity of a minor child was in question.
On this point, one last bit of evidence seems to be a Pandora’s Box:
The above Instagram post appeared on Ahmed Nur Said Elmi’s account on June 12, 2012.
That’s Elmi himself, holding baby Ilwad at the hospital. She was born the day before to his legal wife, Ilhan Omar. Who attested in court that she has had zero contact with Ahmed Elmi since before Ilwad was conceived, let alone born.
The silver lining for Elmi here is that he still likely has little reason to fear a process server greeting him in London with a paternity test.
Because he clearly calls his wife’s child … a niece?
For Rep. Ilhan Omar, everything about this Instagram post is a Code Red, and she’s up for election in six days. PJ Media has emailed her campaign seeking comment multiple times since August 3, but has not yet received a response….
Read the rest here.
lebel says
What does this have to do with Jihad?
oh wait, someone with a Muslim name is accused of doing something wrong. Sorry, carry on.
Kay says
Not just someone– someone who aims to be a leader in our country and part of our government, a country where we value honesty (that means telling the truth) especially under oath.
brenrod says
another muslim taqiyya fraud on infidels, meanwhile the gov and doj will do nothing
gordon miller says
What does this person comprehend about the best interests of this country? Probably very little, and what interest conflicts with sharia she’ll side with sharia every time.
PABLO says
Maybe you should look at who her friends are and who are fundraising for her.
vyx says
Stealth Jihad via the political system.
A muslim in the government lies and gets away with it. A non-muslim– most especially a Christian Republican– would be in jail for what she has done. Yet she is allowed to perjure herself. Because… muslim.
They are taking advantage of the system via political correctness and “islamophobia.” And the US is allowing it.
lea says
Read the Koran, it is quite acceptable to LIE TO US, THE INFIDELS.
Dave Butler says
The Kor-ran is not worth the paper it is written on. A false Bible from a false prophet.
StellaSaidSo says
Lying is acceptable – even obligatory – if it advances Islam.
As you well know, Lebel, being quite practised at it yourself.
lebel says
I am an advanced practitioner of the Taqqiya arts – my kitman is quite strong while my wala wal bara game is improving on a daily basis.
If I understand this thread correctly : if a non-Muslim politician lies it means that a politician lied while if a Muslim politician is accused of lying, its jihad.
gravenimage says
Lebel is terribly concerned that we might not elect dishonest incestuous Muslim thugs. Shut up, you damned Infidels–don’t you know that under Shari’ah no Kuffar is allowed to criticize any Muslim?
VRWC member77 says
It’s al wala wal bara, inferior. And this is exactly why leftist scum like you are the near enemy………because a leftist covert piece of garbage like elison has opened the door for this muslima bint. Civilization jihad is still jihad and enabling leftist scum is still leftist scum.
blitz2b says
Level says “….while if a Muslim politician is accused of lying, its jihad…”
Well it’s a no brainer my friend. Once you cross a threshold of inhumane behaviours like maybe flying planes into buildings (9.11), exploding double decker buses (7.7), countless beheadings, rape of innocent minors ((UK), killing gays at their night clubs (Orlando) et al (over 33,000 and counting), and all condoned by the evil ideology you profess, it’s kinda hard not to look at Muslims with a wee bit of suspicion… No?
don vito says
Mocking islamic doctrine will get you death, but not from me, I’m kufr.
gravenimage says
Lebel only sneers at us about Islam–I doubt very much he does this with his Muslim masters.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Stealth jihad and the hijrah, Libel you are such a consistent apologist … no wait, defector of Mohammadan guilt. Or perhaps just a run-of-the-mill troll.
And so eagerly the first commenter wherever possible.
Sorry, carry on …
Wellington says
Something wrong? Incest and perjury go way beyond merely something wrong, lebel. I would say the same of any non-Muslim but it is instructive how screwed up (excuse the pun) Muslims are way out of proportion to the general population worldwide. I mean over 33,000 documented Islamic terrorist attacks across the globe JUST since 9/11, versus extremely few to virtually none by followers of any other major religion, only helps to sustain my overall point, that being that Islam is a burden to the world such as no other major faith remotely is.
Wake up, lebel. And you won’t wake up as long as you continue in any way to defend the worst religion ever created by man.
lebel says
Right, allegations of incest and perjury but not exactly take over the US to impose shariah law territory, right? You know very well this does not belong on here but you will tolerate it and you certainly will not admit that to me.
“I would say the same of any non-Muslim but it is instructive how screwed up (excuse the pun) Muslims are way out of proportion to the general population worldwide”
Honestly, I don’t think so. Could you imagine if a Muslim American had done or said half of what Trump said or did?
gravenimage says
No, I could not imagine a Muslim trying to protect Americans from Jihad, reimpose sanctions on Iran, or cut foreign aid to Pakistan or the “Palestinians” for waging Jihad.
Is that what Lebel meant?
As for Ilhan Omar, she has sneered at the idea of Muslims imposing Shari’ah in the US. She has not actually said anything critical of Shari’ah that I have ever seen.
https://twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/873648463896031235
She has also sprung to the defense of ISIS Jihadists:
“Rep.-elect Ilhan Omar fighting for defendants in MN ISIS case”
http://www.fox9.com/news/minnesota-isis-sentencing-ilhan-omar-letter
Wellington says
You are on the verge of making no sense, lebel. I mean sometimes you have but defending Islam does terrible things to the mind long term. You could serve as Exhibit #1 on this thread demonstrating this verity.
I hope you retain what sanity you have left, lebel, but as long as you in any way defend the proto-type for Nazism, i.e., Islam—you know, master faith versus master race, blah, blah, blah—there is no hope for you.
As long as anyone defends Islam, there is no hope for that person. So, I didn’t want you, lebel, to think I was “piling on” to you specifically. No, not at all. “All” I want is for you to realize that any defense of Islam cannot be rooted in truth, common sense, equity, a love of freedom, full equality of the sexes, et al. Yeah, that’s all I want.
don vito says
“What Trump said or did”, guaranteed to justify the action of any jihadi. I just love the dialogue of a true believer, or fellow traveler.
Joe says
It is welfare fraud because she has a husband (not her brother) who is not on hook for three kids. The taxpayers take care of that. It is immigration fraud, because she married her brother to get him into the USA. They should be deported, but she is going to Washington to wage legal jihad against the USA. This will include more immigration and welfare fraud, but she will probably up her game.
Do you not consider this jihad?
Chelonia says
Start a petition and send it to Congress and ask the DOJ to look into what this woman has done.
granddaddy says
The reason it’s important is for two reasons. Though she is actually conducting jihad, it is not the jihad that most nonbelievers think of when they hear the word. most people think of suicide bombers and Isis when they hear the word jihad. But actually, they can wage jihad in any way that works,
So when the forbidden months are past, so kill the polytheists wherever you find them, and take them as captives and besiege them and lay wait for them with every kind of ambush…
Quran 9:5
So she is not limited by any kind of “ambush”, which in this case is running for public office. But not only is she running for public office, she is a Muslim running for public office in a country where most of the people are not Muslim and do not understand her religion:
Allah will not hold you responsible for your mere utterance in an oath, but he will hold you responsible for that which your hearts gained.
Quran 2:225
So the lady can lie as much as she wants, as long as she’s a good Muslim. And her oath means nothing, even to other Muslims. But especially in regard to nonbelievers,
Let not the believers [Muslims] take the disbelievers as Auliya (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allah in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allah warns you against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allah is the final return.
Quran 3:28
So she can lie to her constituents as much as she wants to, she just has to justify it. When she gets elected, she will most likely ask to be sworn in with the Quran, because she is a Muslim and because the Quran tells her that she will not be held accountable to an oath which she believes is being forced on her. But even if she is not sworn in on the Quran, it makes no difference, she can still lie, we are still unbelievers.
But if that’s not enough, unbelievers are also contemptible,
Indeed, those who disbelieve, from the people of the book [Christians] and the polytheists [other nonbelievers] will be in the fire of hell eternally therein. Those are the worst of creatures.
Indeed, those who believe and do righteous deeds, those are the best of creatures.
Quran 98:6-7
So she can hold in contempt the people who elected her, and she can lie to them as much as she wants, and she doesn’t have to worry about the oath she took swearing to protect them, because Allah says that’s her right. and she can rest assured that Allah will always have her back,
And they deceived, and Allah deceived. And Allah is the best deceiver.
Quran 3:54
But let’s say she still has her doubts. She can just go to an Imam who can then get a “revelation” from Allah,
Allah erases what he wills and confirms, and with him is the mother of the book (master copy).
Quran 13:39
Pretty neat. Especially considering she doesn’t have to do anything, all she has to do is be a Muslim. Of course, most Muslims will tell you that this is all taken out of context. But then, they can say that. They are allowed to lie.
strong aingel says
Sh is backed up by her law too ..
“Umdat As Salik” aka “Reliance of the Traveller and Tools of the Worshipper – Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law”); as used in this house, I.E. Dhar al-Suhl) quoting BOOK R: HOLDING ONES TONGUE
r8.2reasons that permit:-
The Prophet (Allah bless him and givehim peace) said, “He who settles disagreements between people to bring about good or says something
commendable is not a liar.” This much is related by both Bukhari and Muslim, with Muslim’s version recording that Umm Kulthum added,
“I did not hear him permit untruth in anything people say, except for three things: war, settling disagreements, and a man talking with his
wife or she with him (A: in smoothing over differences).”
r16.2Assuaging those from whom one apprehends harm (mudara):-
r16.2 As for assuaging those from whom one apprehends harm (mudara), it is permissible, being done to obviate the damage and evil anticipated from certain people, whether it be a ruler or someone else one has reason to fear (al-Durar almubaha (y99), 11&-18).
SKAY says
Trojan Horse.
Buraq says
@ lebel
You’re a clown! Your prophet said, “War is deceit”. And so jihad and deceit go hand in hand.This woman has been deceitful, and so her moral authority in a secular system of rule is zero, thereby undermining the authority of the whole system.
So, lebel, would you buy a used car from her? I wouldn’t!
don vito says
This saracen, ilhan omar, is not a true saracen, because she is imitating kufr. Shame on her. If she were a true saracen, and she is in the land of harb, then per the texts and teaching of the four major schools of islamic jurisprudence, she is on jihad.
gravenimage says
Oh, she’s waging Jihad, all right–it’s just stealth Jihad.
Eur says
Islam disgusts me but I also do not have the relationship between jihad and what is told in this article. I am afraid to see Muslim practitioners in Western politics because I believe that basically all Muslims are theocratic and their goal is to blow up the whole democratic system in the West. But this particular case I do not understand.
strong aingel says
Let the islamic law used in this “House” explain the issue re lying (in this house) to you…
“Umdat As Salik” aka “Reliance of the Traveller and Tools of the Worshipper – Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law”); as used in this house, I.E. Dhar al-Suhl); quoting BOOK R: HOLDING ONES TONGUE
r8.2reasons that permit:-
The Prophet (Allah bless him and givehim peace) said, “He who settles disagreements between people to bring about good or says something commendable is not a liar.” This much is related by both Bukhari and Muslim, with Muslim’s version recording that Umm Kulthum added,
“I did not hear him permit untruth in anything people say, except for three things: war, settling disagreements, and a man talking with his
wife or she with him (A: in smoothing over differences).”
r16.2Assuaging those from whom one apprehends harm (mudara):-
r16.2 As for assuaging those from whom one apprehends harm (mudara), it is permissible, being done to obviate the damage and evil anticipated from certain people, whether it be a ruler or someone else one has reason to fear (al-Durar almubaha (y99), 11&-18).
Tom Cherian says
Anyone who respect a vile RACIST slave owner like Muhammad should be shunned and driven out from public square.
SAY NO TO RACISM
SAY NO TO MUHAMMAD THE SLAVE OWNER
SAY NO TO DEMO-KKK-RATS
elee says
She told lots of lies to the kafirs and now she wants them to send her to Washington DC? Sounds like deceit in the course of advancing Islam toward world conquest. Even “small” lies aid the cause.
Michael Wazowski says
From your apt description, it would not be possible to tell the difference between a Democrat Kufr and an Islamist on stealth jihad.
They both seek the destruction of democracy, freedom of speech, and truth replaced by deception, and the subjugation of the people by an authoritarian, paedophlic, Satanic-led One World Government, or New World Order.
Halal Bacon says
And this was never on Jerry Springer?
PRCS says
Heh!
gravenimage says
Good one.
Rarely says
She should, of course, be charged with perjury and, even if convicted, would likely make it into the House where she could feel at home. From what I’ve heard it’s not all that unusual to have congressmen/women with criminal records.
P.S. Incest is OK if you keep it in the family.
PRCS says
“P.S. Incest is OK if you keep it in the family.”
I got it!
mortimer says
It’s even more confusing than the Koran.
lebel says
So there are allegations that a politician lied (about marrying her brother?) and this is part of the Grand Jihad?
Really? this is some taqqiya to implement shariah like the secret Muslim Obama?
Wellington says
There’s rot enough in Islam, lebel, even without jihad, so get off being on one note, la, la, la, all the time. Islam sucks for many reasons, jihad being just one of them. Two others are death for apostasy and the sanctioning of rape. There’s also the matter of general hostility by Islam to true freedom. A lack of a true Golden Rule for all is yet another deficiency in Mo’s creed. Oh yeah, lebel, Islam’s got wrong written all over it over and over and over again. Wake the hell up.
lebel says
OK, I grant you all that.
What does this woman have to do with that? Nothing. You and I both know it since you’re not an idiot. You just won’t admit it because you close ranks in such cases.
gravenimage says
“I grant you all that”? When has Lebel *ever* said anything negative about Islam’s sanctioning rape, murdering apostates, and crushing freedom? He has only ever sneered at these horrors before.
And now he is hoping we have failed to notice her support for ISIS Jihadists.
Wellington says
So relieved, lebel, you grant me what you did.
Man, you still don’t get it. Islam is rotten to the core and so why defend it at all? This is the ultimate bottom line. I mean name me just one good thing about Islam that can’t be found elsewhere—and yet there is so much iniquity and ass-backwards thinking in Islam that is deuce difficult to find anywhere else. So why defend it all?
As you do. So, please tell me why.
Might as well defend Nazism as defend Islam. Yes, Islam is this rotten.
blitz2b says
+1 Wellington.
When will these oafs ever realize that Islam has no desire to live harmoniously with any other faith or no faith group. lebel is just one of the 1.6 billion walking blindly into an abyss.
don vito says
What justifacation could there possibly be for anyone to say what you want to hear? Delusion rules your reason. You aren’t trying to build bridges, you are constructing a wall around your safe space, you must certainly believe in borders. I believe in borders to protect kufr from jihadis. To protect truth from lies, and liberty from oppression. Your deceitful words must always remain a target for kufr.
Isntlam says
“So there are allegations that a politician lied (about marrying her brother?) and this is part of the Grand Jihad?”
How idiotic. How stupid. The movement of Muslims into US politics is jihad.
Enjoy spending your life in a state of complete stupidity.
don vito says
Pssssssst, you want truth? This must be said in a very low voice with hands cupped around the mouth…..maybe you should sit, halal style….( it’s all a conspiracy, yep). s/
Rarely says
I don’t see her lying in her divorce documents as having much to do with her being a muslim. People lie (perjure) themselves in divorces all the time to expedite the divorce. Marrying her brother in the first place (and not being from the Ozarks) is pretty weird unless she needed an intervening marriage/divorce of convenience before returning to husband #1.
In any event we would appreciate our elected representatives acting a little better than this. AND we would like world peace, fewer forest firesand the return of The Far Side.
.
Logic&Reason says
If she was a Republican, the Left’s mainstream, propagandist media would be all over it.
Hypocrisy rules on the Left. That’s what Trump has unveiled….truth doesn’t matter to them. Only power.
Sam says
Why people can not see what is really going on in the western world. Enemies of freedom are taking positions at all levels of society. Military, police force, government.
First obligation of a muslim is to other muslims. Infidels have to come last. So how can she make good decisions for all Americans?
infidel says
SO many illegal Muslims in India are now elected Govt reps… Always want shortcut to power without any genuine service or hard work.
aingel strong says
We have former members of the Kashmir Liberation Front (KLF) sitting on (at least) one English Borough Council – and allah knows who working in elected and staff roles in most government departments. The bog standard antics described in this post belong to a very large movement spanning the entire western domain; that of a prospering supranational foreign constitution given aid and comfort by “leaders in every town, its wicked men” [Ali]; “great ones to be its guilty ones” [Shakir]; great ones of its wicked ones”[pictkhall]; “great ones of its wicked people” [Khan]; “greatest of its criminals” [Saheeh] :- surah 6:123. Giving moslems licence to act under the laws of the islamic state within the jurisdiction of [your] democratic state is akin to handing over control of the House to a bullied seven year old’s class mates. This is not unintentional effect of migration, but is a key strategy in the pursuit of jihad. The worrying factor is how large the aid and comfort given to those clearly exploiting “cultural differences” whose aims are clearly divisive and yet are deemed “secular” or another such fancy term. A csaual glance at the statements of say Sajid Javid, the UK HS, by anyone with knowledge of islamic “sacred law” will know that he is mutawa rather than futawwah inclined. The prob;em with being a moslem, any moslem, is that to be one you have to work for the islamic state; that is the islamic law, applicable to ALL moslems. The terror of allah has many shades. It is no coincidence that serpent cults have been associated with rainbows; though whether their tools of worship inclined toward visible electromagnetic phenomena or otherwise is another inquiry.
WPM says
+1
like communist , and Nazism control of the government to advance their goal of world wide rule .The libtards still think Islam is like being a vegetarian or some other personal harmless choose of life style choice..
J.K. says
So another of ill repute gets elected…business as usual in the Swamp.
J.K. says
So another of ill repute gets elected…business as usual in the Swamp
bonnie loranger says
Takkyia. Liars
Fred says
So they will only elect a Muslim to replace the Muslim elseworth or whatever it’s name is ? Kind of like if a land becomes Muslim, it is always Muslim ?
gravenimage says
Yes–disturbing. And the appalling Keith Ellison is now running for Attorney General in Minnesota, where he can do even more damage.
the thought offender says
Seventeen years after 9-11, it is inexcusable that representatives of an adversarial, antagonistic, supremacist civilization which insists that it holds an obligation to the Almighty to smite unbelievers and erase their civilizations, and all record of them till “None is worshipped but Allah” continue to be present within our beloved Republic.
Dr. Jasser is welcome. Tarek Fatah is welcome. But unless a Muslim can demonstrate their secularity [ and the burden of proof is upon them ] I want them expelled for incurable incompatibility. I’m not waiting for the inevitable homicides. Period.
allahscum says
What kind of precedent does this set that you can lie, marry your own kin and then run in government. On another note, am surprised these people haven’t grown hooves yet.
Sofia says
They have: an ass is their symbol: they all hee-haw plenty.
KWJ says
I was talking to a black American today for a long time. We got on the subject of Islam. He mentioned that he lived near a bunch of Muslims and he said, “They don’t like us…they think they are better than us.” I had to explain racism on the Middle East.” Also that black Americans have nothing in common with Somalians, et al except for skin color.
I asked him what is something that black Americans ate well known for and do very well. He said music. No Scott Joplin, no Little Richard, Cab Calloway, swing dancing, etc happened under Islam and Africans weren’t playing pianos and saxophones. I was telling him about Keith Ellison and I don’t know why black people would willingly follow a prophet who had slaves and the white Arabs still having them. He is familiar with Islam as his brother-in-law was from Sudan. He knows about the whole wudu washing and Muslim’s attacking Christians in Sudan. His brother-in-law had talked down about Christians as part of his da’wa. This guy didn’t stick with it.
I told him how ‘they’ try to pit blacks against whites’ when I have more in common with him than he does with a Somalian except skin color…culture, language, religion, etc. Since blacks in Somalia are not a minority there like blacks here, they don’t even have those same issues.
He is also unhappy about illegal immigrants and refugees that get more help than homeless citizens. He too also resents this “positive discrimination” towards Muslims and pointed at a poster advertisement of a girl in a hijab.
I think some black Americans (meaning the slavery descendants who have been here forever) feel taken for granted. The media makes it seem like all minorities are somehow united but in actual day to day living they are not.
We ought to talk more to black Americans and challenge people like the black guy in CAIR because they try to suck in blacks to Islam and often for the rituals and “structure” and they don’t tell them about all the rules about slave’s in sharia law. Muhammad Ali was fooled aka Cassius Clay which his parents named him after a white male abolitionist. I hate to see people sucked into cults, no less apostasy laws. We need to talk more about commonalities and not so much negativity. Also Louis Farrakhan is no hero to blacks.
EDWIN FISH says
Just another example of the common practice of jihadis to feel free to lie to us dhimmis, and to flaunt our laws, culture, and morality. Better yet she is about to replace Ellison in our Congress. Oh,btw, she will probably claim to uphold the Constitution, though the only law she respects is sharia. Sharia says its okay for her to lie, and she will.
Valkyrie Ziege says
; I’m on a diet, and this article helped ruin my appetite,
and for that, I thank you.