Loren Rosson has written an extraordinarily detailed, nearly 12,000-word review of my new book The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS, which you can preorder here now. This is one of the most remarkably informative book reviews I’ve ever seen — and Rosson doesn’t hesitate to note where he disagrees with me, as well as where he agrees. Below is just the beginning of it; you can read the whole thing by clicking here.
“The History of Jihad: A Review,” by Loren Rosson, August 1, 2018:
This is the release week for Robert Spencer’s History of Jihad, for which I wrote an advance review back in May. I’ll repeat that preface here and then follow it with more details. The book is a chronicle of Islam’s holy wars that cuts through all the myths, and it represents the crown and summit of Spencer’s work, which he describes as follows:
“I’ve written a guide to the Qur’an and a biography of Muhammad, and with this book, the case is complete — that is, the case that there are elements within Islam that pose a challenge to free societies, and that free people need to pay attention to this fact before it is, quite literally, too late. It is necessary for me to repeat yet again that this does not mean that every individual Muslim, or any given Muslim, embodies that challenge and is posing it individually, but as this book makes clear, the Islamic jihad imperative remains regardless of whether or not any Muslim individual decides to take it up.”
History of Jihad’s value lies not only in its scope — it covers every single jihad theater, from Arabia to Persia, North Africa to Europe, Spain to India, Tel Aviv to New York City — but also its explanatory power. Spencer relies heavily on primary sources and the words of contemporary witnesses, so the reader gets a good impression of how it was to experience the jihad. Repeating without fail are cycles of brutality and piety, and the clear religious motives of the Muslims. Jihadists have always been candid about their reason for waging war — to subjugate infidels under the rule of Islam — but people in the 21st century have a hard time accepting this, and have grasped at every possible explanation except the obvious one. Studies have proven that there is no correlation between Islamic terrorism and poverty; there are as many middle-class and well-to-do jihadists as poor ones. Unlike most of human warfare, holy war is waged primarily for spiritual reward, and it operates irrespective of rational purpose. It takes the guardrails off civilization, and you can’t reason with it. This makes Spencer’s book a horror drama as much as an historical one, and it’s hard to put down.
It’s rare to see myths about Islam debunked so thoroughly, though we got another one recently from Dario Fernandez-Morera in The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise (2016). The reality of Islamic Spain is that there was no fruitful cooperation between faiths. The Muslims were less friendly to Jews and Christians than American Southern whites were to blacks before civil rights. In Spencer’s book, the same conclusion is drawn in all times and places:
“There is no period since the beginning of Islam that was characterized by large-scale peaceful coexistence between Muslims and non-Muslims. There was no time when mainstream and dominant Islamic authorities taught the equality of non-Muslims with Muslims, or the obsolescence of jihad warfare. There was no Era of Good Feeling, no Golden Age of Tolerance, no Paradise of Proto-Multiculturalism. There has always been, with virtually no interruption, jihad.”
That may not be a controversial point to competent historians, but it’s not what most people believe or are willing to say. Pointing out that Islam is toxic wins you no friends in an age that is less concerned with truth and more with peoples’ wishes and feelings. There is also the problem of funding. Universities with departments of Islamic Studies often receive their support from places like Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and other Muslim nations, and when you factor in the politically correct climate on campuses, scholars are almost guaranteed to promote the usual myths. Spencer’s book, like Fernandez-Morera’s, is free of those pressures. It’s the best available book now on the Islamic jihad. The only other top-notch treatment I know of is Alfred Morabia’s Le Gihad dans L’Islam Medieval (1993), but an English translation is hard to come by.
For all the attempts to isolate jihad as an inner spiritual struggle, it has always carried the unconditional requirement for sacred warfare against unbelievers. Warriors of jihad are promised the property and women of the vanquished enemy if they live, and virgins in paradise if they die. This is true in all schools of Islamic jurisprudence, as cited by Spencer in the Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali sources, which in turn rely on the Qur’an and Hadith. There was never a time when the “greater” (spiritual) jihad was divorced from the “lesser” (military) one. They’re inseparable.
I’ll go through each of the book’s ten chapters and cover the highlights. That makes for a long review, but keep in mind I’m only scratching the surface of the grand opera that is The History of Jihad. Read the whole book and learn from it….
There is much, much, much more. Read the rest here.
Nick says
Hi Robert
Please publish the audio version as quickly as possible.
if possible please use Patrick Egan for the vocal.
Robert Spencer says
How about me for the vocal? I start taping next week.
jewcat says
That would be perfect, Robert!
gravenimage says
+1
Jean-François Vermette says
I know that God will ask to Muhammad the same heritage he left behind him…all he did in his life
mortimer says
The HISTORY OF JIHAD by Robert Spencer will change history.
mortimer says
Now that the world has NUCLEAR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, the continuation of JIHAD IS UNTHINKABLE.
Moreover, we should ask Muslims, “NOW THAT THERE ARE NUCLEAR WEAPONS, ISN’T JIHAD OBSOLETE? After all, NUCLEAR JIHAD IS UNTHINKABLE, BECAUSE IT WILL DESTORY THE WORLD that Allah asked you to conquer !!! Isn’t that counterproductive?”
Furthermore, we should ask Muslims, “SINCE ALLAH IS SUPPOSEDLY ALL-KNOWING, ISN’T HIS ASKING FOR JIHAD UNTIL THE END OF TIME TANATAMOUNT TO ASKING MUSLIMS TO COMPLETELY DESTROY THE WORLD?”
How can Allah be ‘real’ if he asks Muslims to COMMIT NUCLEAR JIHAD???
We must conclude, then, that Allah is NOT real, because he did not know that JIHAD WOULD DESTROY THE EARTH and LEAVE NOTHING left for Muslims to rule over !!
gravenimage says
Mortimer wrote:
Now that the world has NUCLEAR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, the continuation of JIHAD IS UNTHINKABLE.
………………….
Mortimer, it seems that every pious Jihadist disagrees with you. There are over 33,000 Jihad terror attacks just since 9/11 that make this all too clear.
Mark Swan says
Mortimer, your comment is timely here—the World if far less safe than when
the following (below) was said.
1945
Here is General McArthur’s Statement, on the battleship USS Missouri, for Japan’s Surrender
at the end of WWII, after the United States used Atomic Weapons on Japan…beginning the
Atomic Era:
“Military alliances, balances of powers, leagues of nations, all in turn failed, leaving the only
path to be the way of the crucible of war. The utter destructiveness of war now blocks out this
alternative. We have had our last chance. If we will not devise some greater and more equitable
system, our Armageddon will be at our door. The problem basically is theological and involves a
spiritual recrudescence (renewal) and improvement of human character that will synchronize with
our almost matchless advances in science, art, literature and all material and cultural developments
of the past two thousand years. It must be of the spirit if we are to save the flesh.”
gravenimage says
+1
Carol the 1st says
The question seems to be “do we need fantastical stories or man-made political themes in order to give us group focus and unity (and supposedly harness our ‘lost spirit’? – as per Mark). Islam seems to embody a death wish (Thanatos) for all. It’s dense insolubility must surely be explained in this way.
Possibly the best we can do is to expose and thus stamp out it’s ludicrous transparencies.
We need to ridicule, harness, and condemn those who insist upon watering their plants with poison while anticipating a good crop of houris in heaven.
Ewanda says
It is such a relief that Robert Spencer’s book “THE HISTORY OF JIHAD FROM MUHAMMAD TO ISIS” has been published at this time of islam increasingly pushing its way into our valued Western Civilization.
We all knew how relentless brutal islam was in its quest to terminate all the good that Christianity and most gentle belief systems promote, but we could never direct those who regularly scoffed at us towards something so substantially illustrative that supported what we were warning about. Now we have Robert Spencer’s book “THE HISTORY OF JIHAD FROM MUHAMMAD TO ISIS” to silence their criticism until they have read it!!
Let us hope that it will be promoted amongst centers of higher learning instead of being demonized. Who can wait to see the reaction of the Southern Poverty Law Center. It is almost delicious in anticipating their review of Robert Spencer’s “THE HISTORY OF JIHAD FROM MUHAMMAD TO ISIS”. To review it means they must read it and to read it is to become informed.
God bless the efforts of Robert Spencer in devotedly toiling over producing Robert Spencer’s book “THE HISTORY OF JIHAD FROM MUHAMMAD TO ISIS”.
No Muzzies Here says
Ordered it. Price is good.