A Muslim teacher who labelled homosexuals “animals” who should be “eradicated” has lost a claim of unfair dismissal, where he argued he was discriminated against because he is Muslim.
That is the good news; the bad news is that Razwan Faraz and the other teachers have been allowed back into the classroom. Discrimination (aka “Islamophobia”) has become the fall-back position used to justify (with many past successes) virtually any infraction by Muslims, including Muslim rape gangs and the sharia courts that send women back home to their abusive husbands.
Faraz and five other suspended teachers have been allowed to return to the classroom after an independent disciplinary panel discontinued cases against them claiming government lawyers did not share crucial evidence. The National College for Teaching and Leadership panel decided they had no option but to stop the hearings for the school leaders accused of allowing undue Islamist influence in state schools.
“Mr Faraz insisted he has now changed his views about homosexuality and argued that the comments were an expression of his Muslim faith.” So if his views have changed, does this means he no longer holds to his “Muslim faith”? Islamic supremacists routinely lie, and when they break the law, they rarely receive adequate penalties.
The teachers were part of the so-called “Trojan-Horse” scandal where radical Muslim allegedly plotted to take control of schools funded by the taxpayer….and introducing lessons in Arabic.
But when non-Muslims warn of Islamic takeover schemes, they are called xenophobic conspiracy theorists.
“Trojan Horse’ Teacher Who Branded Gays ‘Animals’ Loses Religious Discrimination Claim,” by Liam Deacon, Breitbart, August 13, 2018:
A Muslim teacher who labelled homosexuals “animals” who should be “eradicated” has lost a claim of unfair dismissal, where he argued he was discriminated against because he is Muslim.
Razwan Faraz, 38, the former deputy headteacher at Nansen Primary School was one of five teachers suspended amid accusations of exercising undue of religious influence at three Birmingham academies.
The teachers were part of the so-called “Trojan-Horse” scandal where radical Muslim allegedly plotted to take control of schools funded by the taxpayer, with aspirations including banning sex education and Christian songs.
The schools were also accused of segregating pupils according to sex, banning the teaching of music and drama, and introducing lessons in Arabic.
Despite the claims, Mr Faraz claimed his dismissal was a result of religious discrimination. Faraz lost his job in 2015 over comments made in a Whatsapp group called “Park View Brotherhood” describing gay people as “animals”.
According to The Times, Mr Faraz insisted he has now changed his views about homosexuality and argued that the comments were an expression of his Muslim faith.
But a disciplinary panel rejected his defence, with his comments described as “demonstrably homophobic”.
A tribunal panel found that his comments “were a significant factor in causing the school to be brought into disrepute”. A judgment also described him as “evasive” and “not a credible witness”.
Despite this, Mr Faraz and five other suspended teachers have been allowed to return to the classroom after an independent disciplinary panel discontinued cases against them claiming government lawyers did not share crucial evidence.
The National College for Teaching and Leadership panel decided they had no option but to stop the hearings for the school leaders accused of allowing undue Islamist influence in state schools…..
Uriah Sheep says
Another Muslim for Owen Jones to stick up for.
Andy says
What if the establishment in the UK said we are going to “Ban All Muslim Teachers” what do you think would happen?
Ban All Ultra-Liberal Gender Studies Programs!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgkyyIAnl_o
BC says
What they need to do is close ALL faith based schools. They, like the hijab, niqab and burka are divisive and demonstrate an unwillingness to integrate. Every body must be educated in the same schools with the same curriculum that is the only way to develop integration. It is now quite common to see even small girls wearing hijabs, soon they will be wearing burkas and niqabs
Paul says
For those who want the long background heres a hefty Wikipedia file.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Trojan_Horse
Short background: Muslims are trying to take over by corrupting our children.
Be politically incorrect, don’t give these 7th century morons a chance. Tell the truth.
Michael Copeland says
“government lawyers did not share crucial evidence” – claim.
Really?
This deserves to be investigated.
Dapto says
How come he isnt sent to diversity training like there threatening Boris with ?
Paul says
Yes there should be full disclosure but as there is no mention of what type of evidence was held back we can only speculate. Contacts with banned organisations. Jihad Whatsapp messages.
Recently there was a scandal with the police carrying on prosecutions of rape cases and withholding text messages from the alleged victim of her sexual fantasies.
All parties are dishonest. Thats the UK we live in.
Shelley Bayless says
Another good reason to take your children out & far away from these Institutions of Indoctrination! I’m Christian & believe homosexuality is wrong, but “eradication”? Oh no, that is MURDER!
CogitoErgoSum says
Christians believe Christ took upon Himself the punishment for all sins, including homosexual acts, so that the blood of sinners would not have to be shed in payment for their sins. He taught forgiveness and mercy. Christ set the example for Christians to followe and His followers believe His words and try to be like Him.
Muslims believe Muhammad placed upon his followers the duty to kill not only those who commit homosexual acts but to kill also those who do not believe the words of Muhammad to be true. Muhammad taught that harshness, vengeance and the forcing of others to pay for their sins with their own blood are qualities that will be rewarded with unending sensual pleasure in Paradise. Muhammad set the example for Muslims to follow and his followers believe his words and try to be like him.
gravenimage says
Good post, Shelley.
gravenimage says
UK: Muslim teacher who said gays should be “eradicated” is back in the classroom
…………….
Insanity.
brane pilot says
Try saying ‘Islamic Jihadists should be eradicated’ and see how soon you are back in the classroom.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Paul, i don’t know why you mithraist christians like homosexuality and consider those those who oppose as corrupt deviating from your Judeochristian values . Don’t you know that it is even against the law of nature that even the beasts do not practice it ?There is no enjoyment in the same sex behaviors? Note:physical features of the same sex are not even agitating to sex ,ie man is not attractive to another man and woman is not attractive to another woman. I asked one gave gay, what attracts you to another man?He said he is just obsessed to it like a disease.It means it a disease he infected with by the satan mithraist christians Call Holy Spirit.
But I’m not saying children should taught to kill gays wherever they find them, but they should be taught that it is bad.
CogitoErgoSum says
Ibrahim, are you saying that you do not accept as authentic either of the following hadith:
1. Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If you find anyone doing as Lot’s people did, kill the one who does it, and the one to whom it is done.
Sunan of Abu-Dawood – Book 38 Hadith 4447
2. Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: If a man who is not married is seized committing sodomy, he will be stoned to death.
Sunan of Abu-Dawood – Book 38 Hadith 4448
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Paul, you mean homosexuality is part of judeochristian western values taught by the satan mithraist christians Call Holy Spirit,that anyone who oppose it is corrupting public morals ? To hell with it because it is a sign dark savagery bellow the behaviors of beasts.But I’m not saying children should be taught to kill gays, but to hate this unnatural behavior.
jayell says
So here we have a muslim criticising others for supporting ‘dark savagery below the behaviors of beasts.’
Quite amazing! A case of ‘pots and kettles’ I think, or does Mr. Muhammed not think that the murderous example of his illustrious ‘prophet’ and his disciples might be a touch ‘savage below the behaviour of beasts’? By the way, it’s been long accepted that part of the job of the teacher in the UK is to ‘transmit the culture’ I(of the UK). On that basis, muslims should be barred from the teaching profession.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Cogitoergosum, no I’m not saying gays do not deserve death penalty, but I am saying children should not be taught to take the law into their hands, they should be taught to consider it abominable. The holy Prophet Muhammad said,:”He who sees an evil shall eradicate it if he has power to do so(in this case puting gays on trial for death penalty).if he has no such power he shall condemn it. If condemnig it will harm him, he should detest it in his heart, which is the least in the degree of faith “.In your satanic society, Muslims could only hate gay practice in their hearts, which is the least of faith.
Mary says
So Ibrahim you think it’s okay to rape little girls, but sex between consenting adults is wrong, and what about the perverted paradise with virgins and “young boys “?
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Mary, it is not permissible in Islam to have sex with little girls even through marriage before puberty. But, mithraist churchmen have been having anus and vaginal sex with kids under their care pursuant to mithraist satanic Bible which commands mithraist christians to kill all those living with exception of little girls to be kept as sex slaves.
jayell says
“….it is not permissible in Islam to have sex with little girls even through marriage before puberty….” – but you can perform a crude approximation, apparently, and then it’s OK to do what the hell you like with them once they’re about 11 or 12 especially if they’re not of an islamic persuasion. We know that, Mr. Muhammed, because that’s what your Prophet advocated and got up to himself, and was proud of the fact. Just like here in the UK we are currently filling up our prisons with men of your persuasion who are following your prophet;s example to the letter.
CogitoErgoSum says
So you do accept the validity of the hadiths I quoted. Well, if I understand some of the things you have told me in the past, you do not trust the Bible because you believe it has been corrupted by men and you call St. Paul evil because you think he said things that “twist” or “supersede” the words of Jesus. You have told me that Satan can cast spells and make men hear things that were not actually spoken … as in the case of the Satanic Verses. Why then do you believe the same could not have happened with the hadith? These sayings that are supposed to come from Muhammad may actually come from Satan casting his spells upon people and making them hear things that were not spoken. If I were a Muslim (and I thank God that I am not) I would trust only the words that come directly from Muhammad and which are attributed to Allah and nowhere in the Quran does Allah say that anyone should be stoned for committing a homosexual act. As in the case of Sodom and Gomorrah, it is a sin which should be punished only by God.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Cogitoergosum, that is an assumption like what salman Rushdie did that since satan was able to caste those filth words to the hearings of the scribes :”tilka izan Ghariq ula fa Inna shafaatuhum La turtaja (those are exalted intermediaries whose intercession is needed) “,which Allah alerted the holy Prophet Muhammad in another verse, then the scribes must have recorded similar words in the Quran without being detected, which is a fallacy as scholars, including a Non-Muslim book reviewer, dismissed as rubbish. Remember, Hadith is a practical teachings of the Quran by Prophet Muhammad carried on oral traditions.It was after a century that such oral traditions were documented after strigent scrunity on chains of transmission and intergrity of the reporters. Those reports found to be unauthentic were rejected as false. Those found not complied with all the strigent rules were classified as weak(daef).So, it is not possible for the satan to narrate false information to those reporting the Hadith because those from whom the Hadiths were reported were known with their names and biography. Thus, the question of authentic Hadiths containing satanic words will not arise. Note also that Satan cannot take the form of Prophet Muhammad even in a dream as Prophet Muhammad told us. even the name of Prophet Muhammad is mentioned, the satan will run away from that place. Muslims, including myself, have been experiencing this that whenever the satan attempts to tempt me to do evil i mention the name of Prophet Muhammad he will disappear. In fact, it was one of the miracles performed by Prophet Muhammad after that incidence that whenever the came near a place where Prophet Muhammad was present the satan could not disappear from physical form and people around witnessed him while Prophet Muhammad was cursing him.
Andy says
To: ibrahim itace muhammed enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6UP24j_4JM
CogitoErgoSum says
Ibrahim, either Satan has the power to cast spells upon the senses of men or he does not. If you believe he has such a power you should be consistent in your belief. If Satan can make men hear incorrectly Satanic Verses spoken in the presence of Muhammad then Satan is surely able to make people many years later after Muhammad’s death pass along incorrect information (in the hadiths) about what Muhammad said. If I were you I would trust only words that came directly from Muhammad and which Muhammad said were revealed to him by Allah. That would be the best you can do in a world in which Satan has the ability to control the hearing of men. You are merely rationalizing if you believe otherwise and being inconsistent.
Jayell says
“It was after a century that such oral traditions were documented after strigent scrunity on chains of transmission and intergrity of the reporters.”
After 100 years of just hearsay evidence, without a single piece authentic written evidence and without any means of mechincal sound recording, how the hell do you guarantee the accuracy of anything? This is just total and utter rubbish.