According to an alarming UN report, “ISIS is back…regaining strength….ready for war” and has “gathered 30,000 fighters and could be preparing for a wave of offensives around the world”.
This comes as no surprise to those who understand the reality of jihad terror.
Meanwhile Al-Qaeda also remains dangerous, with powerful franchises in Yemen, Somalia and parts of north Africa. According to the report Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri is “projecting his authority more effectively than he could previously”.
According to the UN report, “there are also fears that ISIS fighters returning from Iraq and Syria could carry out attacks, especially in Europe.”
Jihadists everywhere, as well as the Muslim Brotherhood, are being increasingly emboldened worldwide while too many Western leaders are terrified to be branded with labels which are intended to manipulate people, such as “populist,” “racist,” “Islamophobic,” “anti-immigrant,” and the like.
Muslim Brotherhood operatives also work tirelessly in Western countries to indoctrinate people with the idea that violence is separate from Islam. Yet there is a superabundance of writings by Muslims clearly stating that it is the duty of Muslims to wage jihad in expanding the House of Islam. “Taliban Hamsa,” who was in charge of indoctrinating and recruiting for the Islamic State, “dared the police to call in a religious expert to prove his assertion that the “ISIS is true Islam.” Even a WaPo article entitled “Does ISIS really have nothing to do with Islam” stated:
If you actually look at ISIS’s approach to governance, it would be difficult – impossible, really – to conclude that it is just making things up as it goes along and then giving it an Islamic luster only after the fact.
The truth is that the Islamic State rigidly adhered to Islamic texts and represented (and still represents) a reformist movement harking back to Islam’s early roots of conquest. This is precisely what makes it most troubling and also attractive to its zealous following.
The Islamic State, despite efforts to make it appear to be an aberration of Islam, garnered state support from Turkey — a country that is ambitiously moving toward EU membership. There were also “suspicions of Turkey recruiting ex-Isis fighters by the thousands to attack Kurds in Syria.” Islamic State sex slaves were also being auctioned off in Saudi Arabia.
The UN report warned:
The underlying drivers of terrorism are all present and perhaps more acute than ever before.
“‘ISIS is BACK’ – Terror group ready for WAR with 30,000 fighters according to UN report”, by James Bickerton, Express, August 15, 2018:
The dramatic report claims ISIS is regaining strength in the deserts of western Iraq and eastern Syria, with between 20,000 and 30,000 fighters in the region.
According to the report these include: “A significant component of the many thousands of active foreign fighters.”
ISIS fighters are also “hiding out in sympathetic communities and urban areas” as the group focuses increasingly on guerrilla warfare.
The report claims that ISIS is particularly gaining strength in western Iraq, though it retains sizeable pockets in Syria.
The past 18 months have seen ISIS suffer a stunning series of defeats, with the group loosing much of its self-styled state.
In July 2017 Iraqi and Kurdish forces, backed by Western airpower, recaptured Iraq’s third city of Mosul after a fierce battle.
This was followed by the fall of Raqqa, which ISIS had made its capital, to a coalition of Kurds and Syrian rebels in October.
At its peak around 10 million people lived under ISIS control, which extended from north of Baghdad in Iraq to the suburbs of Aleppo in Syria.
mortimer says
The disinformation about the intrinsic JIHAD DOCTRINE within normative Islam is being disseminated by the Left and Globalists with the effect that there is no IDEOLOGICAL WARFARE against JIHAD TERRORISM. This lack of IDEOLOGICAL OPPOSITION to Islam emboldens the JIHADIS to believe they can win if they continue to terrorize.
The final effect of the lack of ideological opposition is that there is an INCREASE in TERRORISM.
The West should urgently understand that they must UNDERSTAND and OPPOSE JIHAD TERRORIST DOCTRINE in order to defeat it in the minds of Muslims.
Without IDEOLOGICAL WARFARE against imperial Islam, there is no hope of finally defeating Islam. Muslims must see that Islam is totally false before they will abandon jihad.
Halal Bacon says
Fantastic, get them in one area and have a M.O.A.B. party again
Alien Republican says
These morons, these morons. I love the smell of bacon in the morning.
Frank Anderson says
Is there any idea how old the UN report is? When did they end their research?
Sharyati says
Why should we be surprised?? If at all say the ISIS was destroyed to the root there would be a JSIS, KSIS,…. to infinity.
“It is the Jihadi ideology idiot!! Not individual Jihadi groups”
ibrahim itace muhammed says
christine williams, Isis has been dead since its defeat by combined gallant Russian, Syrian, Iraqi and Hezbullah forces unless evil United States, fascist evil Zionist State of Israel and evil Saudi monarchs are working to resuscitate it
Indiana Tom says
yeah, they were so much fun that we are asking for an encore.
F-4E Phantom loaded with napalm sure looks swell.
gravenimage says
Ibrahiim itace muhammed has never said that he has any ideological differences with ISIS–he just considers them rival Jihadists. As for his considering Russians to be gallant, he has said many times here that all Infidels who do not submit to Islam can be slaughtered. He just considers them useful to take out his enemies here. He would turn on them in a heartbeat if he no longer considers them useful, as will most Muslims.
don vito says
itace, mad devil Trump, eh? What a howler! lololol -57
Jon Doe says
Can a link be posted to the UN report itself?
Guy Forester says
Some of the JW readers and posters have recent active duty military experience, so perhaps they can tell me whether I am in the ball park or not. However, these are my observations based upon my time in third world countries, including the ME:
Have you ever wondered how it is that Israel can demolish their neighbors’ military repeatedly, despite being outnumbered and out gunned? Yet we struggle after DECADES of being in Iraq and Afghanistan with overwhelming firepower and superior training and tactics? Well, here are my explanations for what it is worth as a non-military person.
1. The very characteristics that we tend to promote in our society are what will shorten your tenure and possibly your life in a 3rd world military: Initiative, creative thinking, resourcefulness, critical thinking, and the ability to step in and take decisive action when circumstances put you in charge (as in the unit commander is incapacitated and you need to finish the mission).
2. Third world societies, especially the military run from the top down. No input from the inferiors is requested, desired, or tolerated. You do as told and repeat the propaganda mantras if you plan to live very long. Family connections and loyalty to the ruling despot are far more important than anything else.
3. Third world police and militaries are there to protect the ruling elites from the unwashed masses in case said masses get tired of being exploited, enslaved, and kept mired in perpetual poverty and ignorance. The military is not designed nor trained to invade anything other than the most weak and vulnerable neighbors.
4. On the other hand, the people of many third world countries have very strong family, clan, and tribal allegiances and will fight to the death anyone that threatens their group.
5. It is both a strategic and tactical error to think that just because the official military can be disbanded that the locals are no longer a threat. They thrive on intertribal warfare. They detest outsiders and will make intertribal alliances to drive out said outsiders.
6. The third world locals know every rock, stream, watering hole, cover, tree, valley, animal and person in their area. They use these to harass, hide from, and attack any outsiders they deem a threat.
7. These locals and their societies have lived like this since before the Egyptians built the pyramids. Religions, nominal rulers, and weapons may have changed, but probably not much else.
gravenimage says
Guy, I think if Israel tried to bring democracy to any to of their neighbors that they would have similar problems. Defending themselves is a different matter.
Jim Jatras says
Mary Kissel of WSJ still singing old song on Fox today, that ISIS is making a comeback because the US (read:Trump) abandoned “moderate pro-democracy Sunnis” (both of them) fighting Assad — so of course these “moderates” had no choice but to opt for jihad. https://twitter.com/marykissel/status/1029714959071158272
A truer picture is here. http://www.moonofalabama.org/2018/08/un-sanction-monitor-us-watches-as-isis-in-syria-recuperates-pumps-and-sells-more-oil.html#more The fact is, elements of our government that don’t want us to get out of Syria have been turning a blind eye to ISIS’s resurgence, if not worse.
Walter Sieruk says
Concerning ISIS there remains the ,very important, question “How to truly defeat ISIS once and for all ?” The answer to that question was provided in a speech by the ISIS spokesman, Abu Muhammad al Adnani, now dead, in this speech he had declared “True defeat is a loss of willpower and desire to fight…” he further explained “We would be defeated and you victorious only if you are able to remove the Quran from Muslim hearts.” All this leads to a very important question: “Is the Quran the Word of God or is it a fabrication of a man. Thus, is the Quran the truth or a fiction and a hoax ?” The jihadists, as those of ISIS use many verses from the Quran as the main source of justification for their violence, mayhem and murders. As found in For example, 2:191.. 4:47 5:33. 9:5,111,123. 47:4 The answer is clearly given on pages 145 through 157 in THE ISLAMIC INVASION by Robert Morey in which he wrote a section on the Quran with its self-contradictions. Just two of the many he cited are the following “The Quran differs on whether a day is a thousand years or fifty thousand years in God’s sight’ and “Who was first to believe? Abraham or Moses [Sura 6:14 versus 7:143]? The above is inconsistent and illogical. Further, Morey wrote about “The fact that Judaism and Christianity broke up into different sects was used in the Quran to prove that they are not of God [Suras 30:20-32. 42:13, 14]. Yet Islam has broken up into many warring sects and therefore cannot be true if the Quran is right.” Moreover, Morey in his book shows many more contradictions and absurdities in the Quran, there are and how Muhammad incorporated extra Biblical and Jewish folklore along with pre-Islamic Arabian myth and parts of Zoroastrian and Hindu stories into the Quran. Furthermore, the Muslims claim that “the Quran is the direct, literal word of God unmodified in any way by the Prophet who uttered them at the bidding of God.” Nevertheless, in the book UNVEILING ISLAM by Ergun Mehmet and Eethi Caner has shown that the Quran was modified in the following account on pages 45. “Muhammad felt the need to improve on the words of Allah, since he changed Allah’s wisdom for his own on several occasions. A hadith tells of the nonchalant emendations of Muhammad:’ On a number of occasions he [a scribe] had, with the Prophet’s consent changed the closing words of verses. For example, when the prophet had said ‘God is mighty and wise ‘ Adbollah b. Abi Sarh suggested writing down ‘Knowing and wise’ and the Prophet answered that there was no objection. Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Adbollah renounced Islam on the grounds that revelations, if from God could not be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites.’ Other writers reveal that later Muhammad and his people did go war with the Qorayshites and he personally killed Abdollah. Obviously Abdollah knew too much and Muhammad wanted Abdollah’s knowledge to die with him.” In conclusion, the Quran is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax.
Indiana Tom says
Why does anyone expect a cease fire in a 1400 year old war?
Silly people.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
walter sieruk, your mithraist Bible was concocted more than a century after jesus’ departure and pagan doctrines like Godman and begotten son of God were incorporated later in the year 325 AD, while the Quran was recorded in the presence of Prophet Muhammad and he taught it for 23 years.So,you are only saying such lies to save your pagan manual. A fool!!
CogitoErgoSum says
A very similar argument can be made against your hadiths, Ibrahim. As far as the Quran, we have only Muhammad’s word that it came from Allah through a spirit who said it was Gabriel. ALL of Islam relies upon whether or not you believe the word of one, single, solitary man who supposedly admitted he didn’t even know whether he was going to Heaven or Hell. Really? Who is being fooled here?
James Lincoln says
CogitoErgoSum,
You are quite correct, however logic will not work with ibrahim. I know, I have tried.
gravenimage says
What tripe from Ibrahim itace muhammed that the Bible did not exist until 325 AD.
Muslims claim that the Torah and Gospels were at one time as savage as the vicious Qur’an, but were “corrupted” by Jews and Christians–despite, of course, there being no evidence at all for this absurd claim.
As for the Qur’an, the Sahih Hadiths themselves confirm that parts of were lost.
don vito says
itace, where have you learned such nonsense? From the text and teachings of the four schools of islamic jurisprudence? Better you should read from the original, as I have seen you quote from the scriptures. Continue to read the truth, itace, and rid yourself from much deception. Sorry -57
Undaunted says
You, dirt-bag, are a fucking idiot.
gravenimage says
UN report: “ISIS is back” and prepared for “war”
……………..
This should surprise no one.
Lydia Church says
Anyone surprised???
infidel says
Meanwhile in India: ANIMAL MUSLIM shoots his ex point blank by barging into her house in front of her horrified parents…. This horrible creature had pretended to be a Hindu man and cheated this unfortunate woman and made her his girlfriend 2 years back. Later as she came to know of his true ID, she backed away from him.. That is when this animal barged into her home in the Eastern state of West Bengal in India and shot her dead. Guys sure know what happened to that unfortunate UK girl in Queensland.. And this is not the only one. There are many cases of Muslims murdering Hindu women in India for spurning them. A few years back, another Muslim youth burnt a Hindu girl alive for refusing to marry him.. LOVE JEHAAD is a BITTER REALITY and will soon come to the Greater West if not already.
https://www.ibtimes.co.in/spurned-lover-kills-woman-west-bengal-social-media-claims-love-jihad-774824
gravenimage says
Terrible story, Infidel. This poor woman and her family.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Liar Gravenimage, I did stated that pagan doctrines like Godman and begotten son of God were incorporated later in the year 325 AD. Remember, there were 200 books of the mithraist Bible written by anonymous writers before council of Nicea deliberations and were squeezed to present number of books in the mithraist Bible ,including such pagan doctrines from mithraism, and the rest were banned by Roman power under Constantine as apocalypse .In the case of the Quran there has been no such squeezing or expunging and addition of the portions recorded in the presence of Prophet Muhammad. such bogus claims by orientalists and mithraist christian evangelist liars That some verses of the Quran were eatened by a goat or that some companions of the Holy Prophet Muhammad later added some portions were all false. Assuming, not conceding, the goat ate some verses of the Quran, those who compiled the Quran like Zaid bn thabit already committed the whole Quran into memory from the time it was being recorded in the presence of Prophet Muhammad ànd as such can easily recall the verses said to be eatened by goat. Again, there has been no claim even among heretic Islamic sects like khawarij and later Ahmadiyya that some portions of the Quran were omitted or added after the demise of Prophet Muhammad, all the differences arose from interpretations.
CogitoErgoSum says
The hadith in which Aisha says that a verse about 10 sucklings being required to become a Mahram and also another verse which lowered the number of required sucklings to 5 were once in the Quran (but are not there now) comes from Sahih Muslim which means the hadith is trustworthy. If the hadith is to be believed then those two verses Aisha mentions about suckling disappeared (maybe by being eaten by a goat or maybe by being destroyed by Muhammad’s wives after his death) because no such verses are in the Quran as we have it today.
See this video by David Wood and he explains it in detail:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0taTSaUO2hM
gravenimage says
The dishonest ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
Liar Gravenimage, I did stated that pagan doctrines like Godman and begotten son of God were incorporated later in the year 325 AD.
………………………………
What claptrap. The idea that one only finds Jesus being regarded as the Savior after 325 AD is just absurd.
More:
Remember, there were 200 books of the mithraist Bible written by anonymous writers before council of Nicea deliberations and were squeezed to present number of books in the mithraist Bible,including such pagan doctrines from mithraism, and the rest were banned by Roman power under Constantine as apocalypse .
………………………………
As usual, the appalling Ibrahim itace muhammed knows nothing about Christianity–but that does not stop his preaching the murder of Christians over his ignorance.
And these books were not banned; they were just thereafter regarded as apocryphal. I own a Book of Common Prayer from the 17th century that includes many books of the Apocrypha.
And his usual claim that the idea of Jesus being the Savior comes from Mithraism is ludicrous. The only thing that Christianity ever took from Mithraism was some of its early imagery, like the halo.
More:
In the case of the Quran there has been no such squeezing or expunging and addition of the portions recorded in the presence of Prophet Muhammad. such bogus claims by orientalists and mithraist christian evangelist liars That some verses of the Quran were eatened by a goat or that some companions of the Holy Prophet Muhammad later added some portions were all false.
………………………………
It was not “mithraist christian evangelist liars” who created the Hadiths, but devout Muslims, including the companions of Muhammed recording his words. In the case of this Hadith, it is traced all the way back to Aisha, Muhammed’s favorite wife.
More:
Assuming, not conceding, the goat ate some verses of the Quran, those who compiled the Quran like Zaid bn thabit already committed the whole Quran into memory from the time it was being recorded in the presence of Prophet Muhammad ànd as such can easily recall the verses said to be eatened by goat.
………………………………
The verses apparently included stoning, which are *not* included in the Qur’an. Of course, this hasn’t stopped barbaric Muslims from stoning victims to death anyway, on the basis of the Hadith.
Still, Muslims have bemoaned the fact that stoning is not included in the Qur’an, which likely would have led to even more dead rape victims.
More:
Again, there has been no claim even among heretic Islamic sects like khawarij and later Ahmadiyya that some portions of the Quran were omitted or added after the demise of Prophet Muhammad, all the differences arose from interpretations.
………………………………
This is one of the reasons why pious Muslims oppress and murder the Ahmadi–that, and their rejection of violent Jihad.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Cogitoergosum, David wood is a real devil using the same garbages of lies concocted by orientalists and mithraist christian evangelist liars .I checked sahih Muslim in its original Arabic version on the issue, but there is nothing to suggest that such verses said to be eatened by a goat are missing from the Quran, more particularly the verse on the number of suckling that makes a woman a mahram(prohibited for marriage). The verse on suckling is boldly written in the Quran.In fact it is an analogy from this verse to address the issue of how many times of suckling it is required for a woman to become a mahram. Aisha never claimed that the number 10 was stated in a that verse which was eatened by goat. The only controversy is whether the verse on Stoning to death for adultery is Abrogated or borrow from the Torah as “shar min qablina (Divine law before Islam) “.According to preponderance of Muslim jurists there was no such verse nor borrowed from the Torah, but a “tahsis (qualifying or exception) “by a Hadith where Prophet Muhammad said 100 lashes mentioned in the Quran only applies to those who are not married, those who are married it is Stoning to death. Read Fiqh books for you to understand the genesis of such juristic debate.
Thank you
CogitoErgoSum says
Ibrahim, please provide me with the exact chapter and verse in the Quran where I can verify what you are saying about the the number of sucklings required for a man to become a mahram. David Wood says no such verse is in the Quran but now you tell me there is such a verse. If you can point that verse out to me I will be able to see for myself.
To read the hadith from Sahih Muslim concerning this matter see Book 16, chapter 6 (The Book of Suckling), number 1452. To make it easy for you here is a link to that hadith at sunnah.com:
https://sunnah.com/muslim/17/30
So, please do me the favor of providing the chapter and verse in the Quran concerning the 5 sucklings needed to make a man mahram so I may read the verse in the Quran for myself. Please.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Cogitoergosum, read sura 2:233 on suckling generally and sura 4:23 on the issue of a woman not from the same mother with a man but breastfed from the same woman that turns them into sister and brother ,in which case they shall not marry each other. Sura 4:23 read:”wa Akhawatukum firadaati(your sisters or sister from suckling )”.The reference you have provided is referring to Abrogation on the issue of how many times breast feeding is required for a woman to become muharrama (prohibited to be married), not on the issue of lost verse or eaten by a goat,there is no mention on that. Aisha never said the verse was lost or eaten by a goat. she was saying the text was Abrogated, but ruling is there. Note:It is only the prophet himself who can indicate which verse is Abrogated, not the companions after his death like Aisha. Again, if you can read Arabic in the Hadith you have cited there is no mention of missing verse.
CogitoErgoSum says
Ibrahim, Allah is the only one who can abrogate a verse from the Quran. Muhammad is not Allah; he only transmits the messages of Allah. Where is the abrogating verse in the Quran? That is what I am asking you to provide me. I would like to read it. Other abrogating and abrogated verses are still in the Quran. Where is this abrogating verse reducing the number of required sucklings from 10 to 5? (And yes, Aisha does mention that verses are missing from the Quran after Muhammad died. Please read the hadith more closely.)
gravenimage says
The witless ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
Cogitoergosum, David wood is a real devil using the same garbages of lies concocted by orientalists and mithraist christian evangelist liars .I checked sahih Muslim in its original Arabic version on the issue, but there is nothing to suggest that such verses said to be eatened by a goat are missing from the Quran, more particularly the verse on the number of suckling that makes a woman a mahram(prohibited for marriage).
………………………….
What a load of tripe. No one said that this Hadith is found in the collection of Sahih Muslim; it is hadith no. 1944 in Sunan Ibn Maajah.
More:
The verse on suckling is boldly written in the Quran.In fact it is an analogy from this verse to address the issue of how many times of suckling it is required for a woman to become a mahram.
………………………….
This actually *is* in the collection of Sahih Muslim. This, from Islam Q & A, the most widely read Islamic site in English:
https://islamqa.info/en/111404
Of course, many civilized Infidels thought it was a joke when that Saudi cleric urged women to nurse grown men, but this is a real thing.
More:
Aisha never claimed that the number 10 was stated in a that verse which was eatened by goat. The only controversy is whether the verse on Stoning to death for adultery is Abrogated or borrow from the Torah as “shar min qablina (Divine law before Islam) “.According to preponderance of Muslim jurists there was no such verse nor borrowed from the Torah, but a “tahsis (qualifying or exception) “by a Hadith where Prophet Muhammad said 100 lashes mentioned in the Quran only applies to those who are not married, those who are married it is Stoning to death. Read Fiqh books for you to understand the genesis of such juristic debate.
Thank you
………………………….
“Juristic debate”–this is how the appalling Ibrahim itace muhammed regards Muslim barbarians dragging a rape victim to a hole in the ground and stoning her to death at the hands of a howling mob. God, I hate Islam.
More, in reply to CogitoErgoSum:
Cogitoergosum, read sura 2:233 on suckling generally and sura 4:23 on the issue of a woman not from the same mother with a man but breastfed from the same woman that turns them into sister and brother ,in which case they shall not marry each other.
………………………….
Here’s Qur’an Sura 2:233:
“Mothers may breastfeed their children two complete years for whoever wishes to complete the nursing [period]. Upon the father is the mothers’ provision and their clothing according to what is acceptable. No person is charged with more than his capacity. No mother should be harmed through her child, and no father through his child. And upon the [father’s] heir is [a duty] like that [of the father]. And if they both desire weaning through mutual consent from both of them and consultation, there is no blame upon either of them. And if you wish to have your children nursed by a substitute, there is no blame upon you as long as you give payment according to what is acceptable. And fear Allah and know that Allah is Seeing of what you do.”
No mention of women suckling strange men here.
Here’s Qur’an Sura 4:23:
“Prohibited to you [for marriage] are your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, your father’s sisters, your mother’s sisters, your brother’s daughters, your sister’s daughters, your mothers who nursed you, your sisters through nursing, your wives’ mothers, and your step-daughters under your guardianship born of your wives unto whom you have gone in. But if you have not gone in unto them, there is no sin upon you. And also prohibited are the wives of your sons who are from your own loins, and that you take in marriage two sisters simultaneously, except for what has already occurred. Indeed, Allah is ever Forgiving and Merciful.”
No mention of grown Muslim men sucking women’s breasts here, either.
Not all that “bold” if it is not mentioned at all.
More:
Aisha never said the verse was lost or eaten by a goat. she was saying the text was Abrogated, but ruling is there. Note:It is only the prophet himself who can indicate which verse is Abrogated, not the companions after his death like Aisha. Again, if you can read Arabic in the Hadith you have cited there is no mention of missing verse.
………………………….
What claptrap. Here’s that Hadith:
“Ayesha said that no Doubt, the verse of Rajam and Breast feeding of adult by ten sucklings was revealed, and it was on a paper below my bedding. When the Prophet (asws) died, and we were busy, a goat entered and ate it”.
Nothing about abrogation there, as Ibrahim itace muhammed ludicrously pretends.
And this Hadith is considered Hasan, or “good”–just one notch down from “Sahih”, or reliable. There are several other categories. This is not considered a weak Hadith.
CogitoErgoSum says
Thanks, graven. We are dealing with two separate hadiths; one is from Sahih Muslim and the other is from Sunan Ibn Maajah. One hadith deals with suckling verses that were in the Quran before Muhammad died and the other deals with those verses having been eaten by a sheep (or goat) as the reason they are no longer in the Quran. The point I am trying to get to is that both the abrogated and the abrogating verses in the Quran are now missing. The Quran has been changed by someone other than Allah. Thus, there has been a corruption of the Muslim’s scriptures; exactly the same thing that Muslims say happened to the scriptures of the Jews and Christians.
Ibrahim does not wish to admit to the corruption of the Quran and feigns misunderstanding. He calls David Wood a trickster but Ibrahim himself is very good at jumping through flaming hoops of blazing confusion so as to befuddle everyone with his amazing feats of mental contortion that defy logical explanation.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Liar Gravenimage, there is no where in Ibn maja Aisha stated that the verses on Rajm and suckling were written on a paper kept on her bed and a goat ate it. it is concocted story by orientalists and mithraist christian evangelist liars. you have misconceived the issue of breastfeeding from the same woman that turns a man and a woman as brother and sister in which case they shall not marry each other. It simply breastfeeding that took place while they were babies, not while they become adults.