Since its inception fourteen hundred years ago, Islam has been at war with the people of this planet. Millions of people have been butchered with the sword of Islam and by the savages of Arabia.
The conquerors wished to make Islam the favored system of culture, faith and allegiance, utterly destroying other powers.
And so, with the defeat of ancient Iran by Islamic jihadis, the objective of the eradication of Iranianness began. Islam was forced down the throat of Iranians with the sword of the Arabs.
Islam lives, breathes and grows on blood. Islam must conquer and shed the blood of non-believers. It cannot possibly live in the hearts and minds of its believers as a peace-loving religion. Islam must shed the blood of infidels, meaning all non-Muslims. Islam is about world domination. Fear of pain and punishment for non-conformism is part of being a Muslim.
Those naïve Americans who believe an interfaith dialogue are doing themselves and their fellow Americans an injustice. Muslims are radical even in their interfaith dealings. Various Islamic sects and sub-sects pronounce other sects and sub-sects as heretic, worthy of death. Women are treated as chattel, deprived of many rights; hands are chopped off for stealing even a loaf of bread; sexual “violations” and “indiscretions,” as defined and delimited by Islamic Sharia, is punishable by stoning, and much much more.
These are standard day-to-day ways of the mainstream “moderate” Muslims living under the Stone-Age laws of Sharia (Islamic jurisprudence). The mainstream of Islam has been outright genocidal from inception. Muslim historians record that Ali, the first imam of the Shiites and the son-in-law of Muhammad, with the help of another man, beheaded 700 Jewish men in the presence of the Prophet himself. The Prophet of Allah and his disciples placed the men, women and children who weren’t murdered into slavery. An ancient Farsi text states:
Ali, who is the successor of God on the earth, and known to fight with a double edged sword, ordered the warriors to cut off the heads of the nonbelievers. Zobair assisted him in finishing this job. Ali also ordered the distribution of the captives and their property [i.e. the ‘booty’] among the Muslims, in accord with Sa’ad (b. Mu’adh)’s [see above] decision regarding the fate of the defeated Jews [i.e., the Qurayzah]. After the battle [and executions], Ali ordered everyone [of the Muslims] to return home. Sa’ad (b. Mu’adh) who had been very anxious during the battle, was now happy and praised God upon completion of his task. Then [later] they [i.e., the Muslims] celebrated and enjoyed beautiful women.
Muslims are taught deception and lying in the Quran itself — something that Muhammad practiced during his life whenever he found it expedient. Successive Islamic rulers and leaders have done the same. The Ayatollah Khomeini, the founder of the 1979 Iranian Revolution, for instance, rallied the people under the banner of democracy. All along, his support for democracy was not a commitment of an honest man, but a ruse. As soon as he gathered the reins of power, Khomeini went after the “Useful Idiots” of his time with a vengeance. These best children of Iran, having been thoroughly deceived and used by the crafty phony populist-religionist, had to flee the country to avoid the fate of tens of thousands who were imprisoned or executed by the double-crossing “imam Khomeini.”
Yet throughout the centuries, Iranians have continued to prevent Islam from making inroads into their cultural identity and divesting them of their heritage. Knowing their culture well, they influenced events and paved the way for posterity to turn the tide. From the beginning, three lines of resistance had become distinct: administrative manipulation, political resistance, and intellectual nonconformity.
Almost four decades after the tragic Islamic Revolution of 1979, the suffocating rule of Islam casts its death-bearing pall over Iranians. A proud people with an enviable heritage is being systematically purged of its sense of identity and forced to think and behave like barbaric and intolerant Muslims. Iranians, who had always treated women with respect and equality, have seen them reduced by the Stone-Age clergy to the subhuman status of Islamic teaching. Any attempt by the women of Iran to counter the misogynist rule of Muhammad’s mullahs is mercilessly suppressed. Women are beaten, imprisoned, raped and killed, just as men are slaughtered without due process or mercy.
One must pay attention to how Islamic spokesmen engage others in discussion. When they don’t like what they hear, they resort to ridicule, accusations and name-calling. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if these people would, for once, abandon their primitive mindset and use a civilized method of dialogue? What are the facts that they dispute? Is it the truth that they don’t like? Well, that’s tough. Truth is often unwelcome. If truth were to spread, it would reveal the true nature of Islam — something that is unacceptable to an Islamic ruling class. Yet it is light to our feet. We really must be truthful even if it hurts, and often it does. Are there any questions about the facts?
- Muhammad died and did not leave a written will (he was illiterate, that’s understandable). So his high-ranking disciples began scheming for leadership. The Shias claim that Muhammad verbally indicated that Ali was to lead his ummah. Well, 90% of the Muslims say no he did not, and that the caliphate system was the way to go.
- Shortly after Muhammad’s death, Ali was killed by a Persian hero. Violence was part and parcel of Islam from the get-go.
- Then there was a battle between Yazid’s forces and Hussein. Hussein and his band of relatives/followers got butchered.
- To this day, Shias bloody themselves, their children, and even their babies with self-flagellation in a most horrid way in aza dari (mourning) for what happened to Hussein. What good does this do, other than perpetuate a sense of defeatism and fanaticism that mitigates against Iranians freeing themselves from the yoke of the conniving mullahs? In fact, Hussein’s decree to murder and enslave “inferior Iranians” has been recorded in history, but is kept a secret from the average Iranian Muslim — part of the culture of deceit that is built into Islam. Yet Iranians are told by the mullahs to go out during the month of Ashura and beat themselves over the death of Hussein, their sworn enemy.
The long-suffering Iranian people must put the past behind them and use their excellent talents to join the advanced world,. What a shame to remain stuck in this horrid mentality of victimization.
Iranians deserve better than to be manipulated by a bunch of mullahs who have been having a great ride on the back of the ignorant poor, deceiving the poor and the ignorant with empty promises of all the goodies that they are promised in the afterlife. Forget the afterlife and pay attention to the plight of the suffering masses. Stop playing politics with the lives of the people. Those responsible for this sham have no heart and no shame. Let bygones be bygones, and use the marvelous human potential of Iranians to provide opportunities to better themselves and their families. The most important step in the direction of emancipation of our people is the establishment of the rule of law — not the barbaric Sharia — to grant all Iranians, male and female, young and old, of any and all beliefs, equal rights.
We Iranians don’t have a dog in this fight. In fact, we should rid ourselves of all Islamic sects, Shia, Sunni, or whatever, and stop playing victims of one power or another. Playing the victim may give psychological relief but doesn’t solve any problems on the ground, and problems on the ground we have aplenty. Let’s look forward and do something about the sorry plight of the Iranian people today, so that future generations can recall this generation of Iranians as trailblazers who had the courage to break from the bleak past and launch a bright future.
Peter Buckley says
The Internet is already destroying, and will continue to destroy, Islam:
https://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/Wood/islam_beheaded.htm
Fact.
Elisha says
Great article. Thank you.
Walter Sieruk says
Ayatollah Khomeini and his lying and deceptions started this Islamic regime Iran which is based in the foundation of false and empty promises. As well as lying words. After the fiendish Muslim clerics obtained total power in Iran they showed their true colors by having their Islamic state police who are called the “Revolutionary Guards truest the people on Iran in many heinously brutal and ruthless ways. As, for example, their brutal, callous misogyny against both girls and women. This thesis statement is explained, in some detail, by the following. This tyrannical Islamic regime in Iran that so falsely and inappropriately has the word “republic” in its title. It should be made known that this called the “Iranian Revolution” turned out to be a hoax. Ayatollah Khomeini before achieving power in Iran in his lying and deceptions presented himself to the Iranian people as if he was someone who would be in power would give freedom to the people of Iran with any tyranny. The reality turned out to be just the opposite. As explained by a former Muslim as well as a man who took part in this Islamic “revolution “ ,who is now a Christian informs the reader of his book that “Prior to the Revolution no one ever imagined that other political parties would be suppressed under the rule of Ayatollah Khomeini. He had promised that all groups would have freedom to run their own campaigns after the Revolution. He even stated that governing system would be based on the decision of the people via a referendum. He never spoke of a system that would be governed by Islam. He even made clear that mullahs would not take part in any political activities, and that they would only be allowed to teach spirituality… Immediately after the Revolution, mullahs rushed into government offices to occupy the most important political l positions, making it difficult for the interim secular government to function … The mullah’s occupation of position was exactly the opposite to what the Ayatollah Khomeini had promised before the Revolution.”. [1] In other words, the insincere, disingenuous and outright lying Ayatollah Khomeini made many bogus promise he really had no intention of keeping. His lying deception worked, for he achieved great power in Iran.
Furthermore, of the many heinously evils outcome s of that Islamic “revolution” is the extremely cruel, brutal and demonic misogyny of this hideous Islamic regime. Not only against women but even young girls. As explained by a former Iranian Revolutionary Guard member who defected to the West and how now lives in America his book also informs the reader about the malicious and murderous affront girls in Iran’s Evin prison which reads that those in power ,the “paraded teenage girls in front in front of me as they led them to their deaths. These girls were barely out of their childhood, barely old enough to think of themselves, much less form thoughts against the state. They knew nothing about the machinations of politics. They were innocent in every sense of the word and certainty innocent of trumped –up charges that led to their imprisonment. Yet they suffered fates too brutal for even the most vicious criminal. ..Their few remaining moments of life had been filled with the level of abuse that few can imagine…The author further states “They tortured and killed young girls, in God’s name and before their execution they raped them because they believed that if a girl dies virgin, she will go to heaven, and they wanted to deny them this reward.” [2] This is as malice -filled and viciously wicked as can possibly be. This, very much, reflects the Wisdom found in the Bible which in Proverbs 15:15. For it reads “All the days of the oppressed are wretched. “ and likewise Proverbs 29:2. Which teaches “When the wicked rule, the people groan. “ [N.I.V.]
[1] ISLAM THE HOUSE I LEFT BEHIND by Daniel Shayesteh . Pages 90, 91
[2] A TIME TO BETRAY by Reza Kahlili. Pages 2,3. 117.
Walter Sieruk says
The foundation of this whole Islamic “Republic “of Iran is based on the “holy book” of Islam the Koran, as in 47;4. Some call this religious book, the Quran. All this leads to a very important question: “Is the Quran the Word of God or is it a fabrication of a man. Thus, is the Quran the truth or a fiction and a hoax ?” The jihadists use many verses from the Quran as the main source of justification for their violence, mayhem and murders. As found in For example, 4:89. 5:33. 9:5,111,123. The answer is clearly given on pages 145 through 157 in THE ISLAMIC INVASION by Robert Morey in which he wrote a section on the Quran with its self-contradictions. Just two of the many he cited are the following “The Quran differs on whether a day is a thousand years or fifty thousand years in God’s sight’ and “Who was first to believe? Abraham or Moses [Sura 6:14 versus 7:143]? The above is inconsistent and illogical. Further, Morey wrote about “The fact that Judaism and Christianity broke up into different sects was used in the Quran to prove that they are not of God [Suras 30:20-32. 42:13, 14]. Yet Islam has broken up into many warring sects and therefore cannot be true if the Quran is right.” Moreover, Morey in his book shows many more contradictions and absurdities in the Quran, there are and how Muhammad incorporated extra Biblical and Jewish folklore along with pre-Islamic Arabian myth and parts of Zoroastrian and Hindu stories into the Quran. Furthermore, the Muslims claim that “the Quran is the direct, literal word of God unmodified in any way by the Prophet who uttered them at the bidding of God.” Nevertheless, in the book UNVEILING ISLAM by Ergun Mehmet and Eethi Caner has shown that the Quran was modified in the following account on pages 45. “Muhammad felt the need to improve on the words of Allah, since he changed Allah’s wisdom for his own on several occasions. A hadith tells of the nonchalant emendations of Muhammad:’ On a number of occasions he [a scribe] had, with the Prophet’s consent changed the closing words of verses. For example, when the prophet had said ‘God is mighty and wise ‘ Adbollah b. Abi Sarh suggested writing down ‘Knowing and wise’ and the Prophet answered that there was no objection. Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Adbollah renounced Islam on the grounds that revelations, if from God could not be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites.’ Other writers reveal that later Muhammad and his people did go war with the Qorayshites and he personally killed Abdollah. Obviously Abdollah knew too much and Muhammad wanted Abdollah’s knowledge to die with him.” In conclusion, the Quran is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax and therefore This Islamic regime rests on a “house of cards.” That is total and complete falsehood.
Walter Sieruk says
That heinously cruel and murderous Islamic tyranny of Iran is very brutal and vicious to the Iranian people. Especially regarding females. Both girls and women. For example a teenage girl in Iran was talking to her boyfriend on the phone and then the Islamic state “police” walked over to her and shot her dead. They did that wicked and malicious thing to her because she was talking to her boyfriend and they also didn’t like her clothing. [1] That was a clear cut case of murder and vicious Islamic madness by Iran’s Islamic state “ police”, who call themselves the “Revolutionary Guards”, they got away with their hideous and malice –filled evil because the mullahs as well as other villains in power in that tyrannical Islamic regime
[1] A TIME TO BETRAY by Reza Kahlili page 240
Walter Sieruk says
About that ruthless cruel brutal tyrannical regime of Iran what so unfittingly has the word “Republic” in its title ,for its called “ The Islamic Republic of Iran” [ I R I]. On the topic of this Islamic tyranny a former Muslim revealed that “The IRI system recognizes women as dependent upon men and incomplete human beings who need to be supervised and controlled by men and the State. This author further exposed that “Women are created for the purposes of giving pleasure to men and child bearing – functions that confine them to the home” This is a male Chauvinistic as can possibly be. In addition this writer further makes it known that “The IRI legal system still retains traditional patriarchal bias that can be described as nothing but systemic subordination of women , which is undoubtedly a human rights violation .” This author further reveals that “Iran is of what Islamic fundamentalists desire, an Islamic State, and the consequence of achieving it “State Terror. Instead of utopia, Iran is an Islamic totalitarian nightmare…” and “the Islamic Republic of Iran exists and operates as what every Islamic fundamentalist dreams of, an Islamic state ruled by Sharia …What followed its establishment was the inevitable consequence and inexorable logic of its Islamic premises; state terrorism, a merciless tyranny.” [1] This heinous Islamic has been also exposed by another author who was born and lived in a Middle Eastern nation for many years. She wrote “Female freedom and independence is one of the greatest sins in Islam…” and “Women in Islam are considered unclean, deemed inferior even to dirt.” [2] All this is wicked, unjust and misogynistic to the extreme. Islam had not regard for human life, regardless of what the apologists for this religion will claim.
[1] THE ISLAM IN ISLAMIC TERRORISM BY Ibn Warraq. pages 345-347.
[2] THEY MUST BE STOPPED by Brigitte Gabriel pages 62, 172
Walter Sieruk says
Many young people and strangely many older people, who are Westerns who in the United States as well other countries of the West are, no doubt sincere but very misinformed ,as in misled, therefore say ,because they believe it, that “Islam is a peaceful and non-violent religion .” To those people the first and supreme Ayatollah, who was the very head this current Islamic regime of Iran knows better stated about how he feels about those naïve Westerns .For he declared “Islam grew with blood….Islam is a religion of blood for the infidels” He also said “Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war….I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.” [1]
So, in other words Ayatollah felt nothing but arrogant contempt for those people who say that his religion “Is a peaceful religion” and understand that they in ignorant and uninformed.
Therefore the West needs to wake up to the reality of the truth about the actual violent essence of this religion.
[1] THE ISLAM IN ISLAMIC TERRORISM pages 336,339.
Walter Sieruk says
The actual word “Republic” has on origin the Latin meaning “Of the people” With the mullahs ayatollahs in so much power and even influencing the parliament of this Islamic regime is tyranny is hardly a real republic .Furthermore the ruthless gang of thugs who are the stooges of those Muslim clerics, called the “Revolutionary Guards,” those Islamic State “police” come down hard on the human rights and freedoms of the Iranian people. Therefore the people do have the right to overthrow a tyranny. This reality had even been expressed and described by men of great intelligence .For example the philosopher .John Locke. This is wisdom that mullahs and other villains in power in that Islamic tyranny don’t want the Iranian people to know about or understand
Walter Sieruk says
This brutal and cruel and regime of the mullahs and ayatollahs as well as other villains in power and control in this tyranny of Iran which so falsely and inappropriately has the word “Republic” in its title. This “mullah regime” is oppressive both in the physical sense to the people of Iran and also in the informational way. In that this tyrannical regime severely limits the information the Iranian people receive for the outside world. It stands to reason that the mullahs and others in power in Iran afraid the people might start think for themselves if outside information is received so it’s strongly restricted. This is a reminder of the wise words the Thomas Jefferson had written. Which are “Enlighten the people, generally, and tyranny and oppression of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day.” Likewise, Mr. Jefferson had nobly declared “I have sworn upon the alter of God eternal hostility against every from of tyranny over the mind of man.”
Walter Sieruk says
This Islamic tyrannical regime of Iran has been well nicknamed “the mullahs regime” in which them mullahs and ayatollahs as well as other fiendish and fanatical Muslims in power have a strong and awful control of the Islamic regime of Iran and through their band of Islamic state “police” , who are called the “Revolutionary Guards “come down hard human rights of the Iranian people . Therefore, the Iranian people who are trapped and forced to exist in this Islamic tyranny live in terrible fear of the mullahs and others in power in Iran. This is a tragic and sad reminder of the wisdom that was printed in the periodical of Benjamin Franklin which is entitled POOR RICHARDS’ ALMANACK that reads “Those who are feared are also hated.”
Walter Sieruk says
First point: much, if not all, of that money Iran has now obtained, thanks to Obama and Kerry, will now go into funding weapons and other supplies to Iran murderous terror proxies such as Hezbollah and Hamas. Second point: not too long ago young Iranian woman who now lives in an American city that I now also live in. This city has a newspaper and she wrote an article how she and her mother had returned from visiting her sick and dying grandmother in the hospital in Tehran in Iran In that article this young women explained that the medical and health care in Iran’s hospitals is so terrible that the people of Iran view hospitals s place that people go to not get better but to die. The reason the this second point is brought up is that the mullahs and ayatollahs as well as others in power in this Islamic tyranny Iran will not invest those news funds from, Obama and Kerry, in better health care in hospitals but instead use that money to engage in more support for brutal and murderous militant jihad organizations . For those tyrants in power in Iran don’t care, at all, about the Iranian people. They are only interested in furthering their mad jihad Islamic quest.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Amil imani, you have not made any point apart from reproducing those garbages of lies you have copied from Mr Spence’s fictitious book called”History of Jihad from muhammad to Isis “,which has not been supported by cogent and irrefutable historical evidence. You have failed to trace the true history of Islam in Iran. Tell me how many persians who were Hitherto worshipping fire that were killed when Muslims sacked persian Empire? Remember, shia Islam reached Iran through Iraq in later centuries, Iranians were involved in the conflict between the followers of Ali and muawiyya and even between Hussein and Abbasids. I want know which Iranian culture that was destroyed by Muslims apart from barbaric fire worships? Is worshiping fire worthy of preservation? Remember, during Islamic golden age persian architectural designs was among fields of studies that were molded along with Greek philosophy, Egyptian mathematics and medicine, Chinese and Indian medicine, that gave rise to systematic scientific inquiries exported to Europe through Spain who developed it giving rise to modern science and technology. Iranian Muslims played important role in that project, which mogol invaders weakened when they sacked Bagdad. It is Islamic revolution under mullahs you are insulting that makes Iran great again where Iran have been recording breakthroughs in science and technology as you ought to know . Tell me Before Islamic revolution what Iran has achieved in terms of scientific and technological advancements?
Mr Amil, you have still not told me whether you are still a member of mujahidee Haq terrorist group carrying terrorist attacks on Iran for evil United States or working for evil United States directly?
ibrahim itace muhammed says
I mean Iranians were not involved in the conflicts between followers and muawiyya and even during Abbasids.
ElderlyZionist says
ibrahim, you show yourself to be an ignorant bumpkin when you dismiss the sophisticated and ancient Zoroastrian religion as ‘worshipping fire’. But then, you also mis-identify Christianity as a ‘Mithraist cult’. All your knowledge is from one slim book, full of lies.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Elderly Zionist.
Elisha says
“Amil imani, you have not made any point apart from reproducing those garbages of lies you have copied from Mr Spence’s fictitious book called”History of Jihad from muhammad to Isis “”
So you are calling islamic fictitious?!?! The book is based almost entirely upon ISLAMIC SOURCES, you ignorant buffoon! It is an historical FACT, attested to by atheist scholars that Jesus Christ WAS CRUCIFIED AT CALVARY!! Wake up!!
gravenimage says
ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
Amil imani, you have not made any point apart from reproducing those garbages of lies you have copied from Mr Spence’s fictitious book called”History of Jihad from muhammad to Isis “,which has not been supported by cogent and irrefutable historical evidence.
…………………………………
This is just absurd–Ibrahim itace muhammed has *himself* affirmed that Muslims have the right to rape, enslave, and mass slaughter Infidels in violent Jihad conquest.
And many of Robert Spencer’s sources are Islamic, not Infidel.
More:
You have failed to trace the true history of Islam in Iran. Tell me how many persians who were Hitherto worshipping fire that were killed when Muslims sacked persian Empire? Remember, shia Islam reached Iran through Iraq in later centuries, Iranians were involved in the conflict between the followers of Ali and muawiyya and even between Hussein and Abbasids. I want know which Iranian culture that was destroyed by Muslims apart from barbaric fire worships? Is worshiping fire worthy of preservation?
…………………………………
In other words, Muslims were only slaughtering “fire worshiping” pagans, so this is perfectly Halal! Actually, Muslims are *always* fine with slaughtering Infidels, and they consider any pre-Islamic or non-Islamic culture to be “worthless Jahillyah”.
More:
Remember, during Islamic golden age persian architectural designs was among fields of studies that were molded along with Greek philosophy, Egyptian mathematics and medicine, Chinese and Indian medicine, that gave rise to systematic scientific inquiries exported to Europe through Spain who developed it giving rise to modern science and technology. Iranian Muslims played important role in that project, which mogol invaders weakened when they sacked Bagdad.
…………………………………
We’ve heard *this* Taqiyya before. Note that Ibrahim itace muhammed can never explain if Islam was so forward looking that the Muslim world is in reality stagnant and backward.
More:
It is Islamic revolution under mullahs you are insulting that makes Iran great again
…………………………………
Is Ibrahim itace muhammed referring to the Iranians hanging gay people and stoning women to death? He has lauded both of these horrors.
More:
where Iran have been recording breakthroughs in science and technology as you ought to know . Tell me Before Islamic revolution what Iran has achieved in terms of scientific and technological advancements?
…………………………………
I guess Ibrahim itace muhammed means that Iran has stolen nuclear information from the West, and is now threatening to wipe Israel off the map. *Ugh*.
More:
Mr Amil, you have still not told me whether you are still a member of mujahidee Haq terrorist group carrying terrorist attacks on Iran for evil United States or working for evil United States directly?
…………………………………
Of course, Amil Imani has debunked this bs. Ibrahim itace muhammed has said before that he considers any peaceful criticism of Islam to be “terrorism”.
J D S says
Ibrahim..you speak of historical facts when speaking of the truthful book by Mr. Spencer when there is NO HISTORICAL PROOF that muhammad ever existed yet you follow blindly the so called teachings of a charlatan, really a nonexistent charlatan, that has led you and many more millions like you, to hell. God is shedding tears for the loss of the Muslim race.
Indiana Tom says
But Shia Islam is so much more wonderful than Sunni Islam. Sort of like debating which species of rattlesnake is better than the others.
Iran would be so much better off without Islam.
gravenimage says
Yes–lots of Muslim apologists try to flog this Taqiyya.
shortfattexan says
“Iran would be so much better off without Islam.”
Absolutely. Of course, that’s also true of Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Indonesia, Syria, Egypt, Malaysia, the United States, the United Kingdom, … Actually, the entire world would be better off without Islam.
gravenimage says
+1
J D S says
+ 2
stan Cook says
The planet earth would be better off without religion.
Indiana Tom says
Muhammad died and did not leave a written will (he was illiterate, that’s understandable).
So Allah picked as the seal of the prophets an ignoramus?
stan Cook says
You are assuming that there was a human male whose name was muhammad.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
I mean Iranians were not involved in the conflicts between followers of Ali and muawiyya and even during Abbasids.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
I mean Iranians were not involved in the conflicts between followers of Ali and umayyad and even during Abbasids.
gravenimage says
Yep–Ibrahim itace muhammed is just spamming at this point.
Westman says
“Let bygones be bygones” – this will not work with the mullahs and fundamentalists; remember what happened under the Shah: Islamists could not tolerate the rate of change and the religious students in Qom were insanely jealous of the students who went to America and Europe for a real education.
If there is another revolution, the mullahs will keep trying to undermine the new society and should be eliminated from any participation and the Qom religious universities, razed. The Shah’s fatal error was allowing Khomeini to go into exile instead of putting him in solitary for life.
Wellington says
Ah hell, the Shah should have just killed the perverted bastard. After all, a dead Khomeini in the Seventies would have proved, all other matters being equal, to be much better for Iran to this day.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Wellington, you mean it will be better for Iran have shah who will stealing Iranian wealths and stash it in the economy of your armed robber evil United States? wicked scums of evils!!
Wellington says
In a single word, Ibrahim, “yes.”
Whatever was wrong with the Shah and whatever is wrong with the US, such faults pale in comparison to the faults of the mullahs now running Iran, which country is aligned with Russia, a nation which looks upon NATO, the greatest military alliance in history for the preservation and protection of freedom (even though the present country of Turkey under Erdogan should have been drummed out of NATO years ago), as an enemy and Iran under the effing mullah control-freaks as an ally.
Upside-down world, Ibrahim. You contribute to it. So does christianblood. Shame on you both. And you won’t get what I have just written one whit. That’s why you remain the, in microcosm, burden to mankind which you surely are. Macrocosmically speaking, so does Islam and a Russia which has never figured out that its destiny is better off with the West than with Islam, China, and the other typical henchmen of history. Oh yeah, you won’t get this at all.
gravenimage says
Fine post, Wellington.
And good to see you posting.
Westman says
True, Wellington. The 1979 “revolution” is a retrograde movement in the history and growth of Iran and will someday be viewed as the “lost” years.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Wellington, Iranians are not interested in leaders who have freedom to steal their wealths and stash it in the economy of evil United States while they remain in hand to mouth economy . Iranians want leaders who will utilise their resources efficiently and effectively for development.
don vito says
itace, I have read your posts on this thread, instead of replying to each of your post, just this one will suffice. From your posts, I imagine that you have totally terrorize the kufr members of your family. I fear for their safety from your hands. The children are at risk from you, because of what you believe, as witnessed by your posts here at JW. I had hope that you would earnestly seek the truth. That hope is baseless. You now take it upon yourself to speak for the Iranian people and their leadership needs, rumor has it that the Iranian mullahs have billions of cash stashed in the WEST. If so, what makes the mullahs different from the Shah? Have you not seen the vids from Iran, where Iranians are cursing the mullahs and praising the family of the Shah?
gravenimage says
Don Vito, Ibrahim itace muhammed has said that he has Jewish family members–and also that he looks forward to personally taking part in the genocide to the Jews.
I’m sure they are terrified of him.
James Lincoln says
Check out YouTube videos prior to the 1979 Iranian Revolution.
Compare to what Iran is now.
gravenimage says
Iran’s issues with Islam
……………….
Good to see some Iranians fighting back.
Chand says
Join and support the Mujahideen e Khalq.
gravenimage says
They may oppose the Mullahs, but they initially supported the Islamic revolution in Iran–and they murdered American servicemen and civilians during the 1970s, as well as carrying out a string of bombings against Infidel airlines and hotels.
They have also targeted Bahais.
Outside Iran, they have joined with Fatah in waging Jihad terror attacks against Israel.
There’s lots more–but this group is iffy *at best*.
henrik arboe jensen says
free the persians. tear down the wall khomenei.
Geoffrey Britain says
As long as Iran remains Islamic, throwing out the Mullahs is at best a temporary remission in the Islamic cancer that has infested Iran.
The Mullahs are symptomatic of the disease, Islam itself is the disease.
BILL CRUMRINE says
You are absolutely correct about mohammedanism, a term that a good Catholic priest friend of mine, along with me, use the terms mohammedans, mohammedanism, “piss them off,” so much it turns into fun. Mohammedanism is a cancer that need to be excised from the world. The sooner the better. They holler “Death to Infidels,” and I say “death to all mohammedans.”
Edward Dillon says
This is the true story of islam, thank you for telling it like it is. Its to bad that the media will not publish this or the truth about islam. a great many have learned the truth to late and paid a deadly price. I hope the people of America wake up and stop the muslim ass kissing.
Bowen G says
Christina Patterson: The true religion of Iran is not Islam
Christina Mary Patterson is a British journalist. Now a freelancer, she was formerly a writer and columnist at The Independent.
How free did we feel before this hot, itchy carapace swaddled our heads?
If you want to make a woman feel like a slut, just give her a headscarf. Hair which hitherto caused anxiety only for its recalcitrant frizziness, or greasiness, or stubborn, rogue curls is instantly transformed from neutral, necessary framing of too-tired, too-wrinkled or too-blotchy face into glinting, winking, evil sexual weapon, a trap to catch and poach and traumatise an innocent male.
From the moment I touched down at Tehran airport a couple of weeks ago, I, and the two women journalists I was travelling with, thought of little else. What did we do with our hands, we mused, before fiddling with our headscarves all day long? How free did we feel, before this hot, itchy, blinkering carapace swaddled our heads and addled, it felt, our brains? And what was it like, we wondered, to whip off your cardie when you felt a bit hot? What was it like? We could barely remember.
Our guide had brought thick brown viscose gowns to preserve our modesty, but I preferred the ancient, knee-length jacket I’d bought from M&S. But when the velcro strip I’d stitched on to it, to ensure that no one suffered an offensive flash of betrousered thigh, came off, our guide rushed at me with a safety pin. Later, I bought long tunics in the bazaar. I don’t know what toxic chemical they’d been dipped in, but by the end of the week I had skin like a crocodile. If my mind was captivated by Iran, my body rebelled against it.
“In the Name of God” screamed the application form for press cards, and “In the Name of God” screamed the list of instructions for tourists outside the Crown Jewels. It’s “in the name of God”, presumably, that toddlers stagger down the street in chadors, and men and women stand in different parts of a bus, and the silhouette of even the modern Iranian woman is no longer a female form, but a triangle.
And it’s “in the name of God” that you can be in Shiraz, tucking into chicken delicately spiced with saffron, and dreaming – but only dreaming – of a nice glass of the stuff. “In the name of God”, too, that you yearn for it, pine for it, so that when, at 8am, your plane lifts above the runway, and Iranian soil, you beg for it. “O Winebringer,” you say, or words to that effect, to the steward, “bring us a bucket of wine!” And you are, in fact, quoting Hafez, the great 14th-century Persian poet, beloved of Goethe, beloved of Emerson, beloved of Lorca and beloved of pretty much every Iranian man, woman and child.
It’s at the tomb of Hafez, in a shaded garden surrounded by cypress trees, that you find Iranians worshipping their true God. This is not the fierce patriarch of the mad mullahs, the one which has half the population of a country shrouded in black, and men yelling out at you if your scarf slips, and moral police checking that the young woman you’re talking to is, as you’ve claimed, your cousin. It’s not that God which inspired the exquisite miniatures so central to Persian art, and the beautiful carpets, and the stunning paintings and the rose-scented gardens which offer a taste, as the Persian word for garden, “pardis”, suggests, of paradise.
The God that Iranians worship, it’s clear, as we watch our guide touching the marble tombstone, and mouthing words as if they will save his soul, and hear him recite a poem about spring and a nightingale and a rose, is a God of poetry, a God of transcendent yearning for beauty, a God, you could almost say, of wine, women and song. This, presumably, is why many Iranians treat the poems of Hafez like a guide to life, a Bible, a Koran, an I-Ching. It’s also, presumably, why, for all the public signs of piety, only 1.4 per cent of the population go to Friday prayers.
The fact is that Islam was an Arab import to a culture whose central religion – Zoroastrianism – was non-proselytising and based around a transcendent, non-personal, non-patriarchal God. It was Shah Abbas (the flowerings of whose civilisation are on display at the British Museum) who imposed Shiism on a then Sunni country. As with all Iran’s leaders, his religious refinements were for political ends.
gravenimage says
Thanks for that grim account, Bowen.