Karen Monahan has actual evidence. Christine Blasey Ford has none. But which gets the establishment media attention? Well, which one is more useful to the Leftist establishment? That’s all that matters, not the truth or falsehood of the accusations.
“‘Emotional And Physical Abuse’: Ellison Accuser Posts Doctor’s Report Naming Congressman As Alleged Abuser,” by Peter Hasson, Daily Caller, September 19, 2018:
The ex-girlfriend accusing Democratic Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison of domestic abuse told her doctor in 2017 about alleged “emotional and physical abuse” from Ellison, according to a document the woman published Wednesday.
Karen Monahan’s account in the doctor’s report is consistent with what she has been saying publicly since August: that Ellison was emotionally and physically abusive to her while the two were dating.
Ellison is the deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and is the Democratic nominee for Minnesota attorney general. He has adamantly denied emotionally or physically abusing Monahan. (RELATED: Ellison To Accuser: ‘We Don’t Have To Destroy Each Other’)
“She states that she was in a very stressful environment for years, emotional and physical abuse by a partner with whom she is now separated,” reads the November 2017 report, a picture of which Monahan posted on Twitter.
“She did not have any physical injuries that required an examination in the past. She identifies the individual she was involved with as congressman Ellison, and she is worried about retribution if she identifies him publicly,” the report states.
Ellison’s congressional office did not immediately return a request for comment.
The Democratic Party has maintained its support for Ellison’s attorney general campaign despite the allegations. DNC Chair Tom Perez previously said the committee was “reviewing” the allegations.
Perez later deferred to an investigation by the party’s Minnesota arm, the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party (DFL), which endorsed Ellison’s campaign in spite of Monahan’s allegations.
Monahan wrote Wednesday that Ellison declined any meeting with her as part of the investigation.
“I told the investigator I would be happy to talk with @keithellison [with] them in the room. They asked Keith if he would be willing [and] he declined any meeting [with] me,” she wrote….
Buraq says
Tariq Ramadan reloaded! Ellison’s a clown!
mortimer says
Women! NEVER DATE A MUSLIM! NEVER!
Do you want to be with a MISOGYNIST?
Don’t kid yourself. You won’t win.
Anton Filipenkov says
Makes sence.
Mac-101 says
Every good Christian Women and young Boy who has been abused by these Democrats and Rinos need to come forward if we are to save our Republic by ratin out these Democrats.
Unfortunately, Mary Jo Kopechne can NOT rat out the Lion of the Senate!
StellaSaidSo says
With their latest stunt aimed at destroying the Trump presidency, the Democrats have again revealed that there are no depths below which they will not sink.
CogitoErgoSum says
Under Sharia this would not be a problem for Ellison. If she were his wife he would have had a right to beat her for as little as even suspecting her of being disobedient to him. If she were his sex slave he could have raped and beaten her as a matter of course. If she were a Muslim she would need at least four eyewitnesses to the act of fornication between her and Ellison or a confession by her repeated with no retraction later. Her punishment for fornication (zina) could be as much as 100 lashes or maybe even stoning to death. Under sharia she would most likely have kept her mouth shut.
Feel free to correct me if I am wrong about any of this.
Wellington says
I see no need, CES, for any correction. I do wish more non-Muslims, especially females, would learn about all this, that a wife MUST have sex with her husband when he wants it, that he has a right to beat his wife even if he just “fears disobedience” from her (Sura 4:34), that sex slavery is still condoned by every major school of Islamic theology, both Sunni and Shiite, to this very day, that the Koran itself condones the rape of non-Muslim women in Suras 4, 23, 33 and 70, and, ludicrously, and as you already mentioned, that a Muslim woman must produce four male witnesses in order to prove a charge of rape.
Should the people of Minnesota elect Ellison as their Attorney General it would be a shameful and stupid thing. But since we live in the Age of Nonsense this could very well happen.
mortimer says
Parents, teach your daughters not to date Muslims … they won’t win.
Islam is misogynistic to the core.
– Women, slaves and camels are same
– Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman
– If you relax the woman’s bridle a tiny bit, she will take you and bolt wildly. And if you lower her cheek-piece a hand span, she will pull you an arm’s length … Their deception is awesome and their wickedness is contagious; bad character and feeble mind are their predominant traits
– “[A man’s wife] fears him, while he fears her not, a kind word from him satisfies her, where nothing of hers has importance in his eyes, it is she who must tolerate the presence of concubines, and it is she who worries when he is ill whereas even her death would leave him indifferent
– If a man calls his wife to his bed and she refuses, and he spends the night angry with her, the angels curse her until morning
– Treat women well, for they are [like] domestic animals [awan] with you and do not possess anything for themselves. You have taken them only as a trust from God and you have made the enjoyment of their persons lawful by the word of God, so understand and listen to my words…
– Muhammad’s last words on women during his farewell speech:
– God allows you to put them in separate rooms and to beat them but not with severity. If they refrain from these things they have the right to their food and clothing with kindness. Lay injunctions on women kindly, for they are prisoners with you having no control- of their persons. (Sirat Rasul Allah. Translated in English by A. Guillaume. First published by Oxford University Press, London in 1955)
CogitoErgoSum says
Yes, Wellington, and even is she were an unmarried Muslim woman who was trying to prove that Ellison unjustly abused her she would have to provide a male witness (or two female witnesses) who would override Ellison’s word since the testimony of a woman is worth half that of a man. Plus, she would have to explain why she was alone with Ellison without a male guardian .,,, which would then lead to her being accused of zina. As Robert mentioned in the video he posted yesterday concerning his lesson for policy makers, there is an interesting story concerning Aisha that helps explain some of these rules that now exist under Sharia.
gravenimage says
Spot on, CogitoErgoSum.
Arthur says
It’s OK for Ellison to abuse women because it’s his culture (Islam), and multiculturalism is always a good thing. But it would be wrong for any Christian or Jewish or _____(fill in the blank)____ person to abuse people because that is not their culture. Multiculturalism allows everyone to operate under different sets of rules. One set of rules for you, one set of rules for me.
gravenimage says
Muslim Brotherhood Rep. Ellison’s accuser posts doctor’s report naming him as abuser
…………………
Well, *this* is damning.
J.W.K. says
The left wingnuts are twisted beyond belief and off the chart. That is nothing new in the happy land of make-believe also known as POLITICS. Just business as usual.
Mary J Derrick Thornberry says
Progressive Minnesota will never ‘malign’ Keith Ellison as he is both black and Muslim.
Mary J Derrick Thornberry says
Progressive Minnesota will never disavow Keith Ellison. He is both black and Muslim.
Robert I recently trried to post this but I mus have not followed the correct procedure as I do not see it
listed here!
Chickpea