An opportunity to get thousands of votes that would mean a changed political game plan. That was what lay on the table when two moderaterna politicians came to a meeting at the Alby Mosque. The invitation came from their political opponents – Greens party Ali Khalil. And the votes were not without strings attached.
The votes were in exchange for a mosque building permit, proposed by Muslim Greens candidate Ali Khalil. As absurd as this sounds, the concept is not new. Politicians all over the West have been sacrificing their nations’ democratic traditions — which huge sacrifices were made to establish — for the sake of the Muslim lobby’s vote, no matter what the cost or the consequences for their countries and citizens. There are many Muslim organizations with roots in the Muslim Brotherhood that influence the voting within their communities and pledge to support the party that will aid their objectives the most. The case of this amoral Muslim Greens candidate in Sweden is unfortunately quite common.
“Muslim Greens candidate proposed selling votes to opposition party in exchange for mosque building permit,” by Ted Ekeroth, Tundra Tabloids (thanks to The Religion of Peace), September 7, 2018:
An opportunity to get thousands of votes that would mean a changed political game plan. That was what lay on the table when two moderaterna politicians came to a meeting at the Alby Mosque. The invitation came from their political opponents – Greens party Ali Khalil. And the votes were not without strings attached.
The moderate opposition councilwoman Stina Lundgren and her secretary went to the Alby Mosque in late July for what they thought was a regular visit. But the meeting soon takes an unexpected turn.
The moderaterna officials get an offer. It’s about an opportunity to get thousands of votes in the election. An adequate number, according to Stina Lundgren, could mean a change of power in the long-term red-green municipality.
“They said that the congregation is about 4,500, and they could tip as many as 3,000 votes,” says Stina Lundgren.
But it’s not free. Stina Lundgren and her colleague were secretly offered votes – in exchange for the Moderates to ensure that the congregation is granted building permission for a new mosque……
gravenimage says
Sweden: Muslim Green Party candidate offers to sell Muslim votes in exchange for mosque building permit
………………….
This type of cynicism on the part of Muslims should not surprise. I just hope we don’t see the same kind of cynicism from the Infidels in Sweden.
Michael Copeland says
In Norway….
Norwegian-Palestinian Loai Mohammed Deeb was charged with misappropriating and laundering 10 million NOK (U$1.2 million) from his own human rights organization. …….
Deeb is set to appear at the Stavanger District Court in Norway to respond to charges of embezzlement, money laundering, violating the Immigration Act and Norwegian Customs Act, perjury and forgery.
This should not surprise. After all, “Permissible Lying” is part of Deeb’s ideology.
(Manual of Islamic Law, “Reliance of the Traveller”, r8)
Renate says
Muslim Green Party? Since when did Muslims ever care about the environment?
gravenimage says
Yes–the idea that there is anything environmentalist about Islam is almost as ridiculous as the claim that it is feminist.
Garry says
When Christians are allowed to build a cathedral in Saudi then I think we can allow them a mosque or two. A medieval ideology should be encouraged…. Oh sorry I meant when their ideology joins the 21st century then they should be allowed a voice. Sell votes? Corruption? Democracy? What a scam!!
Westman says
Wow.. The easy corruption of socialism by Islam on full public display without a hint of embarrassment. Trading political favors like the Mafia or the Chicago political machine. Give it time, and it will become extortion.
Gjallarhornet says
What strikes me about this, is not the obvious corruption, which always trails islamic dealings. That is to be expected – just standard islamic Middle Eastern ways. No, what got me thinking is that the the man with the indecent proposal is a representative of a Center-Green Party. Not a left party, not a right party, and certainly not a muslim party (Anyone who knows the Green Parties in Scandinavia knows that they don’t even remotely have anything to do with islam. They are for middle class natives who just want more nature).
My point is this: Here we have an eco politician, a green politician, of muslim background, who is in a party that has one concern, and one concern only: the environment. But what is his real concern behind the green and trendy facade? Well, it is actually ‘Screw the environment! Let’s build a mosque!’.
???
Am I the only one to notice this phenomenon? That many muslims may take on many cloaks and come in many westernized forms, but still give this impression that their main task in life is to spread islam. This guy for instance is even willing to rat out is own party, which inclines to the *left* … by selling votes to the *right* (The Moderates are Sweden’s main conservative right party). Exactly the opposite of what his voters would vote him in for. ‘Damn the environment as long as islam is spreading’ is the attitude.
Does anyone else find this tendency frightening? The way muslims use whatever topic is popular, presenting themselves to the public as messengers of a popular cause, while being just concerned about making the islamic foothold stronger?
Am I the only one scared of the deception at work here?
Walter Sieruk says
As for the topic of permits of the construction of many mosques in the nation of Sweden ,this is all part of the Muslim political /religious scheme for the advancement and dominance of Islam by the sly insidious method of the stealth jihad. Therefore about this two thing should be made clear.
First. as for the building of mosques in the different area’s o the country of Sweden , the actual meaning of the constructions of those mosques has been explained by a former Muslim who is now a Christian, Dr. Daniel Shayesteh, in his book ISLAM THE HOUSE I LEFT BEHIND for in page 99 it informs the reader that “The mosque is vital for establishing Muslims as sovereign over non-Muslims in a non-Islamic society or country. Building a mosque in a non-Islamic society or country symbolizes Islam’s claim over that society or country, even with a non-Muslim majority.”
Second, concerning the entire Islamic strategy of what is known as the Stealth jihad otherwise called the Muslim method of Islamic Gradualism to enact Sharia law in Sweden . In contrast to the way of the violent jihad or also called the militant jihad .This non-violent form of the jihad for Islam is a very sly, insidious, subtle and deceptive way of working for the advancement of Islam.
This Muslim scheme for achieving the goal of the Islamic agenda is as, many times, as subtly effective as it is demonically clever. Furthermore, this Islamic gradualism, in some ways, is very similar to the instruction printed in the book entitled THE ART OF WAR by Sun Tzu. Which reads “At first, then, exhibit the coyness of a maiden, until the enemy gives you an opening; afterwards emulate the rapidity of a running hare, and it will be too late for the enemy to opposes you”
Vicky King says
Unless we ban Islam in America, There WILL BE a muslim political party within a few years. We are losing our country to a savage diabolical enemy!
Simon Harris says
This is very common in Labour run councils in England. This chart from the 2017 national election shows just how effective mosques for votes is:
http://www.brin.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/2017-general-election.png