Why does this keep happening?
Sexual assault occurs in all cultures, but only in Islam does it have divine sanction.
One survivor of a Muslim rape gang in the UK said that her rapists would quote Quran to her, and believed their actions justified by Islam.
The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
“Girl ‘had slept with 100 men by 16 and had baby at 15 after being passed around by abusers,'” by Ben McVay, Mirror, September 8, 2018:
A young girl was “passed around” and had sex with 100 men by the time she was 16, a child abuse trial was told.
The girl, who cannot be named for legal reasons, claims the abuse she suffered between 1998 and 2001 began when she was just 13 years old, jurors heard.
Her video interview was played at the trial of eight men accused of sexual abuse of five girls over a five-year period from 1998 to 2003.
They were arrested and charged as part of Operation Stovewood – a police investigation into sexual abuse launched after the Rotherham grooming scandal.
Sheffield Crown Court, South Yorkshire, heard how her number would be passed around between the men – with others then “demanding” to meet her.
She said: “I can honestly say that by the age of 16 I had slept with 100 Asian men – some I didn’t see again.
“The ones who come and use you for one time are the ones who are hard to remember.
“As soon as you get to know them your number gets passed around.
“Asian lads demanding to meet you – then you meet a new group and it went on like that.
“I didn’t know at the time I was being passed around when I was 13 but I know now I’m older.”
Tanweer Ali, 37, and Mohammed Imran Ali Akhtar, 37, are both accused of indecently assaulting the girl between 1998 and 2001 when she was under the age of 16.
Ali and Akhtar would have been aged between 17 and 20 during the alleged period of offending….
Akhtar, of Rotherham, faces four counts of indecent assault, one of supplying a controlled drug, one of rape, one of procuring a girl under 21 for unlawful sexual intercourse with another, one of aiding and abetting a rape and one of sexual assault.
Tanweer Ali, 37, of Rotherham, faces two counts of indecent assault, two counts of rape and one of false imprisonment.
Salah El-Hakam, 39, of Sheffield, faces one count of rape.
Nabeel Kurshid, 34, of Rotherham, faces two counts of rape and one of indecent assault.
Iqlak Yousaf, 34 of Rotherham, faces two counts of rape and two counts of indecent assault.
Ajmal Rafiq, 38, of Rotherham, faces one count of false imprisonment and one count of indecent assault.
Asif Ali, 33, of Rotherham, faces three counts of indecent assault.
An eighth defendant, who cannot be named, faces three counts of rape and one of abducting a child.
The trial continues.
Heidi says
What about the community and Police officials who turned a blind eye to the plight of those girls? Will they be let off the hook? People like that should be removed from public offices and also face a stiff penalty.
gravenimage says
+1
Andy says
Free our People, Get Islam OUT of Judeo-Christian Civilized Countries.
Islam offends me!
& Billions of other people!
UK Police Declare War on “Insults”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POdhBaWJAhc
Con Bradley says
There are more to blame withholding evidence.
fudge says
Wel!, when i was a little girl growing up in the 1960’s it was well known then, so why was nothing done then?
StellaSaidSo says
Ah, the permissive 60’s, when paedophilia was almost de rigueur for the elite class, and practised quite openly. Remember the ‘groupie’ phenomenon? Rock stars with underage girls, and not a raised eyebrow in sight. The rape of boys was conducted somewhat more discreetly, but nevertheless, we know the identities of many famous offenders. For years, the Muslims got away with their abuse of kafir girls because the victims were mostly working class kids, many from unstable backgrounds, and the people whose duty it was to care for them were often complicit in their exploitation. And then there was galloping political correctness, which declared that certain people were exempt from certain rules.
Jim says
Heidi, your point is well taken. However, all of us making comments here should also be copying this article and emailing it to our favorite daily news source (CBS, ABC, CNN, etc.) and asking them why they are not also reporting on this (after all, are we not living in a global society?). The actions of Les Moonves, Charlie Rose, Al Franken, and others (all of whom I by no means am defending) pale in comparison to the story above, which we all can find evidence is duplicated daily in cities around the world.
It is not so much FAKE NEWS that is at the heart of contemporary society as it is the lack of courage to report NEWS THREATENING SOCIETY’S EXISTENCE for fear of being accused of being phobic, whereas there is nothing irrational about this kind of fear — it is very real and justifiable. Certainly 9/11 is proof enough.
sue says
Jim, thank you – I couldn’t have said it better, couldn’t have described this country’s media’s hypocrisy more succinctly.
Barbara Vandewalle says
Being raped is not ‘sleeping’ any one. I dislike the title of this article. It makes it sound as though the girls had a choice.
How is it the parents could not protect her? I am not blaming them, wondering how these girls fell thorough the cracks.
StellaSaidSo says
+1
gravenimage says
Barbara, I agree with you about this headline, but it comes from The Mirror, not from Jihad Watch.
And most of these girls are “at risk” children–those from abusive or neglectful homes, those in foster homes, or runaways. Many of them have no parents or guardians to protect them.
But they *should have*. This is in no way letting parents or British authorities off the hook.
And in a few cases these girls *have* had people trying to protect them, and have shamefully received no support from police or the courts.
Charles says
Re Mr. Spencer’s blurb’s headline. Should have been : “…had had a baby…” (pluperfect).
Dawne says
“1998 to 2003” note the dates when this young girl was raped by this Muslim gang. She wasn’t the only child in Rotherham treated like this. South Yorkshire Police Force did nothing about this gang of Muslim paedophiles despite the fact that they were told about it. This is the same South Yorkshire Police Force that yesterday tweeted that it wants people to inform them of “non-crime hate incidents”.
It beggars belief. If you have a twitter account, tweet them as to why exactly they think they should deal with things that are not crimes? They’re the police and supposed to be enforcing the law, not making it up
CogitoErgoSum says
It is obvious that all of these Muslim men had sex with young kafir girls not because the men were in love with the girls but because the girls were merely an easy means of obtaining sexual gratification. Love was not a motivating factor; sex was. A Muslim man would be aware that Allah does not love kafirs so treating a kafir girl with disrespect would not be a problem and most likely would even be pleasing to Allah. According to Islam some people are placed upon the Earth by Allah solely for the purpose of being inferior to the “superior” Muslims. Muhammad has delivered Allah’s message: not all men are created equal and all women are inferior to men ……. with the lowest of the low being a kafir girl.
mortimer says
Islam is a rape cult. Genocidal rape is DECREED by Allah in K.4.23-24.
Do look it up as well as the canonical commentaries.
Rape is Islamic. And Sharia law has no punishment for raping a kafir.
gravenimage says
All true. Moreover, the “Prophet” Muhammed was a rapist who also urged his vicious companions to rape women.
DHazard says
Muslims with a shred of conscience left will choose Nikah Mut’ah. This is a temporary marriage for the sole purpose of avoiding committing zina. If you’re married it’s not prostitution or rape.
“”Quran (5:87) – “O you who believe! do not forbid (yourselves) the good things which Allah has made lawful for you and do not exceed the limits; surely Allah does not love those who exceed the limits” Surprisingly the context for this verse (found in Bukhari (60:139) is temporary marriage, in this case, trading an article of clothing for a few days of access to a woman’s body. By calling this a “good thing,” Muhammad really stood traditional morality on its ear.””*
*from site “TheReligionOfPeace”.
Susan B says
DHazard – What is the difference raping or paying some slave or slave owner for sex? Islam hates women period including muslim women. So a “MALE” has allah’s permission to cheat with some poor soul who probably has no rights. How sick is this evil cult and how sick is this female hating “so called” god? Does allah also give women this right to cheat????? Of course not!!!!
allah allows the abuse and rape of girls and women and little boys, because allah is the rapist pig mohammad.
StellaSaidSo says
Susan B:
Your issue is with Mohammed, not with DHazard, who is merely quoting.
gravenimage says
Yes–DHazard is a staunch Anti-Jihadist, and is just describing the Muslim mindset, not condoning it.
Benedict says
“UK: Girl raped by 100 men by age 16 and had baby at 15 after being passed around by Muslim rape gang.”………..
A society that has abolished the patriarchy will suffer such consequences – especially when savages are imported to roam the streets.
Susan B says
Benedict you do know that islam is patriarchy even if on the extreme end and in it’s 7th century form. And you do know that the police and government officials allowed the abuse of this little girl because they are patriarchs as well. Patriarchy is all about male superiority with the females being the servants to men, sexual service is part of that. If these people actually thought that females were humans as valuable as the males of the species, they would not have allowed this would they? So western patriarchy is just a more civilized 21st century version of islam. Not much different to islam is it?
Benedict says
Susan B: My ideal of a father and a man is a “gentleman”.
I like Harvey C. Mansfield’s reflections on manliness.
Susan B says
Benedict, thanks for taking the time to respond. So you were referring to “Harvey C. Mansfield’s reflections on manliness” which I am not familiar with. I did a quick perusal on google, but have not got the time right right now to do an in depth. Can you please enlighten me as to whether Mansfield supports patriarchy or is this a different concept that I have no knowledge of.
Just so you know, I do believe that men and women are different which I have no problem with. The problem I have is with patriarchy which is a concept of male supremacy. Could you please clarify? Thanks.
StellaSaidSo says
The problem you have, Susan B, is that you are stuck in a 70s feminist time-warp.
gravenimage says
I also believe in the equality of men and women.
Islam certainly does not, though.
And, sadly, I can personally vouch for the fact that children not being protected is not a recent phenomenon.
Susan B says
So Benedict what part of patriarchy are you so in love with. Please count me out.
pa·tri·arch·y
ˈpātrēˌärkē/Submit
noun
a system of society or government in which the father or eldest male is head of the family and descent is traced through the male line.
a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it.
a society or community organized on patriarchal lines.
plural noun: patriarchies
What is an example of a patriarchy?
patriarchy. The definition of a patriarchy is a system of society where the men are the head-of-the-household, carry the most power and where the family lineage passes on through men. An example of a patriarchy society is where men hold the control and make all the rules and women stay home and care for the kids.
StellaSaidSo says
SusanB, the aspect of patriarchy which Benedict refers to is the traditional role of the male as the protector of women and children, which has largely been lost amid the strident demands of modern ‘feminists’ for an ‘equality’ which can never be fully realised.
To liken ‘western patriarchy’ to Islam is just silly.
Mickey says
You are correct. Feminists have destroyed our Country with their man-hating ideologies that they are better than men. I wished the male figure of today would stop being such wussies and take care of their families and protect them instead of leaving it up to the woman to do everything. This is why we have a weak society. Politicians have pushed their hate-men agenda and “more women should work and control the world.”
There are enough Feminazis controlling the government offices and they only weaken our society with their liberalism.
Susan B says
STELLASAIDSO – You said “the aspect of patriarchy which Benedict refers to is the traditional role of the male as the protector of women and children”.
So you can read the mind of Benedict? Did Benedict say bring back the family? No, he said patriarchy so until Benedict says that was not what he meant, he meant patriarchy.
You said “strident demands of modern ‘feminists’ for an ‘equality’ which can never be fully realised”.
So there are all these “strident demands” out there for “equality” because “they” think we are all equal no matter what our individual talents. This is what you claim that these “strident” people are pushing? Really, and you know this how? Who are all these strident feminist, could they be the male “powers that be” trying to destroy the relationship between men and women? You can’t legislate equality; we are all different; none of us are equal so how do you think that legislating equality is even viable? What you said does not even come close to making sense. Feminism is about EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND EQUAL UNDER THE LAW!!! Can you not see the difference?
StellaSaidSo says
No, SusanB, I don’t claim to ‘read the mind’ of Benedict. What I did was carefully read his post, and try to deduce its most likely meaning. The reference to savages roaming the streets (streets which, once upon a time, were populated by responsible, community-minded men) was a bit of a clue. This protective function is an important aspect of traditional patriarchal society. I am sure that Benedict will correct me if I’m wrong, but I’ll wager that my interpretation of his post is more accurate than yours.
StellaSaidSo says
BTW, SusanB, thankyou for demonstrating just how strident and hysterical and incoherent modern feminism has become.
I can assure you that I am old enough to know what REAL feminism is. And yours aint it.
Susan B says
Mickey so women have “destroyed our Country with their man-hating ideologies that they are better than men”.
Really Mickey, so women are now haters of men???? The only hate I see is coming from MGTOW brainwashed males like you. Do not put the failure on the west on women, try going after the globalist and their agenda. None of the NWO/deep state are women, not the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers etc or the leader and chief of this group the Payseurs. All these families are very male dominated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imPvpG6asYg
Susan B says
Stella I was around when feminism of the 60s started, so do not pull that Stella is wiser and smarter than Susan BS. The fact that you call the indoctrinated boys and girls of the socialist and leftist schools feminist, shows that you are missing a ton of information. These leftist are trying to change what feminism means. Do you honestly think that the globalist care about any human rights male or female? You actually think that the globalist running our governments care about equal rights under the law? They, the globalist, use those buzz words to push their agenda, which of course, is the opposite of human rights. And it seems many fools fall for it.
StellaSaidSo says
SusanB, if you were around in the 60s, you ought to know better than to peddle the incoherent nonsense you have spewed here.
Stop presuming to read my mind, and start reading my posts. For more than a year I have consistently raised the subject of NWO globalism on JW threads, and for about 5 years have been educating people in the ‘real’ world about it. Save your bile for someone who isn’t on your side.
Susan B says
So why do you support Benedict and his call for patriarchy? Enough said, I am tired of this circular conversation.
StellaSaidSo says
SusanB, your reading/comprehension skills are truly abysmal. Neither Benedict nor I ‘called for patriarchy’.
Susan B says
Ah Stella, has Benedict chimed in to say that I am wrong in my interpretation of his comment? I see he is not saying anything because he knows what he meant and is not stepping up to support your interpretation. You are blind I am not.
StellaSaidSo says
Stop digging a hole for yourself, SusanB. Chances are, Benedict is not here to comment. Your assumption that his silence automatically signifies agreement with you is further evidence of your low cognitive ability. As if you hadn’t already supplied abundant proof.
Benedict says
??
gravenimage says
Being for equality between men and women is “strident and hysterical and incoherent”?
StellaSaidSo says
GI
I said no such thing, and you well know it.
Assuming meanings that aren’t there, and reacting hysterically to what you thought was said rather than to what was actually said is not an adult way to argue.
Benedict says
Here is the Christian ideal: “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.”
If that is lacking in a society we will have an increasing number of women giving up their lives for repulsive, self-loving men or two sexes competing for dominance behind the never ending demands for equality.
StellaSaidSo says
There is much to be said for the Christian ideal, Benedict.
The faux feminists have turned Western men into grinning soy boys, afraid to ‘be a man’ because that might be ‘macho’, or – even worse (shudder) – ‘patriarchal’. After years of being told ‘I can fight my own battles, thanks’, the modern male now says ‘Fine by me’, and goes back to the sofa.
gravenimage says
UK: Girl raped by 100 men by age 16 and had baby at 15 after being passed around by Muslim rape gang
……………………….
Poor thing! And she is far from the only victim.
More:
One survivor of a Muslim rape gang in the UK said that her rapists would quote Quran to her, and believed their actions justified by Islam.
……………………….
*This* is how Muslims think:
“He said that raping me is his prayer to God”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/08/he-said-that-raping-me-is-his-prayer-to-god
God, I hate Islam.
Andy says
Totally agree, GI
I HATE ISLAM.
Islam should not be in any Judeo-Christian Civilized Country!
Lots of victims of the so called religion of peace, Poor girl.
Andy says
Anne Marie Waters tells Katie Hopkins: “I don’t recognize Britain anymore”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wZufWaa3EM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlSdx-fZxV0
StellaSaidSo says
Thanks Andy. Anne Marie is on a roll! Great to see.
Andy says
My pleasure, Stella
Cheers!
gravenimage says
Thanks for the links, Andy.
Peggy says
Unfortunately our governments love Islam.
They can’t get enough of it being inflicted on us not them.
Western Canadian says
Not too many years ago, the penalty for proven rape was often execution. Anything short of bringing that back to deal with this type of sub-animal filth, along with the mosque they attend being utterly demolished, the imam jailed for life or executed, and their families deported with only the clothes on their backs, will fail in ending this crime spree.
Krishna says
slept with 100 Asian men right
Susan B says
Krishna – this little girl was raped by 100 muslim males.
StellaSaidSo says
I think Krishna knows that, SusanB.
He was drawing attention to the euphemism ‘slept’, and the term ‘Asian’, the use of which is similarly designed to obscure the truth, and is offensive to Sikhs, Hindus, and East Asians.
Not having a good day with comprehension of other people’s posts, are you?
Susan B says
Stella, I have to admit I do not have your great skill of being able to read people’s minds. God bless.
StellaSaidSo says
Susan B, your posts here amply demonstrate that it is you, not I, who presumes the ability to ‘read people’s minds’.
I simply read their posts, and apply a little reason and logic in interpreting them.
Susan B says
Stella “I simply read their posts, and apply a little reason and logic in interpreting them”.
Which you do without any personal bias of course. I look at what people say and believe them. I do not put words or thoughts into their minds or mouths. Different approach. Insulting me is not going to strengthen your case.
Susan B says
Should read, I believe they mean what they say, not believe what they say.
StellaSaidSo says
Susan B, you have grossly misinterpreted several posts here, so you are in no position to criticise me.
In the case of Krishna’s post, you neither picked up the tone in his use of the word ‘right’, nor recognised the significance of his Hindu name. Perhaps you were unaware that other ‘Asians’ bitterly resent being implicated in the crimes of ‘Asian’ Muslims. No ‘personal bias’ need be involved in interpretation – just a little knowledge, and a careful reading of what the other guy actually said.
If you think that you ‘do not put words or thoughts in their minds or mouths’, I suggest that you re-read your posts here. You certainly attributed to me things I never said or thought.
You don’t have a leg to stand on, and you know it. As for ‘insults’, take another look at your own posts and note who threw the first punch.
CogitoErgoSum says
Stella and Susan
:
I’m thinking a little punctuation goes a long way in helping convey meaning. When I first read Krishna’s comment I took it this way: “Slept with 100 men. Right?” So my first impression was that Krishna was insinuating that the sex with these men was completely willing and voluntary and not forced upon the girl in any way.
Then I went back and read it as: SLEPT with 100 men. Riiiiiiiight. Taken this way Krishna could be expressing skepticism about the sex being voluntary.
To tell the truth, I still don’t know what the true meaning and intent of Krishna’s comment really is. Only he knows for sure and it appears he is unable or unwilling to explain himself.
I appreciate the comments made by you two, however. Thanks for being here. Clearly able to understand what you both write (I think).
CogitoErgoSum says
Now I have to go back and look at myself. I just realized that I completely blocked out the word “Asian” from Krishna’s comment. I hope this means that my subconscious mind considers it to be totally irrelevant. The men were Muslims. Apparently, the men’s race or ethnicity is of no importance to me. (At least, I hope that is the correct explanation.)
Krishna’s comment seems to be somewhat like an inkblot test. You see (or don’t see) in it what you want.
Susan B says
COGITOERGOSUM, Interesting comment about the inkblot test. At first go I thought Krishna was being facetious, and then was not sure so posted my comment. Thanks for your input.
StellaSaidSo says
Hello Cogito,
Of course you are right re punctuation, and some posts can indeed be ambiguous. These are the ones where one should pause before rushing in to a response. I am familiar with Krishna’s posts, so I’m fairly confident that I read him correctly. I am 100% certain that Susan B didn’t.
Most of the exchange with Susan B here relates to a series of posts elsewhere on this thread, where she attributed meanings to posts which simply weren’t there, and became abusive when this was pointed out to her.
Baucent says
She needs to drop the “Asian” word. They are not Asians (that implicates innocent communities), but Pakistani muslims. The “Asian” term was devised by the corrupt political class and media to shield muslims from criticism.
Politicianophobia says
Western Canadian, I am with you 100%. Trudeau should start with Imam Mazim Abdul-Adhim, Canadian head of the world wide, terrorists group, Hibtz ut-Tharir, living in London, Ontario.
All Canadians please remember to vote out of office:1 Justine, 2 Iqra Khalid, the MP who introduced M-103 3. Omar Alghabra, all the Liberals and NDP who voted in favour of M-103……………….to keep Canada free.
Save Europe says
I’m sad for my Nepalese, Sri Lankan Tamil and Singalese, South Korean and Thai friends that they are tarnished by the term ‘Asian.’ They sure as hell don’t rape non Muslim women for racial and religious motives. The MSM need to desist using the term Asian.
mark says
MUSLIMS = SATANS WHORES