This is an urgent call to all free people to rise and defeat the Islamic jihadists who are marching under the banner of the religion to subdue all non-Muslims. It is imperative that the values and the way of life of civilized people be protected against the assault of the jihadists’ savagery born from a primitive culture of long-ago Arabia. There is nothing to negotiate here. Nothing to compromise, for the jihadists are on a non-negotiable campaign for Allah.
What should we do
We urgently need to establish an Islamic Review Board tasked with the mission of ensuring that the edicts and legal precepts of Sharia are in no way permitted to take root in the United States of America.
Sharia is antithetical and inimical to the Constitution of the United States, the Bill of Rights, the American rule of law and our values.
Unquestionably, it is incompatible with our Constitution, democracy, freedom, liberty and rule of the people, by the people and for the people, and with the other foundational principles of our republic. A few examples should suffice:
Religious freedom and freedom from religious coercion
The right to practice any religion or no religion, as well as separating religion from state.
Non-Muslim rights are strictly curtailed. Lip service is paid, from time to time, to religions of the book, Judaism and Christianity. Yet in practice, even these sanctioned minorities are treated with harmful discrimination. Jews and Christians are classified as dhimmis; they are subjected to special religious taxes, and disenfranchised from many rights of citizenship. Separation of the mosque and the state is considered another abhorrent frivolity of the non-Islamic heathen societies. The mosque is the state in Islamic lands, either directly or indirectly.
Freedom of assembly
The right to gather and associate with any individual or group.
Religious minorities are frequently forbidden from assembling together, and freedom of association is an alien concept in Islam. Muslims are warned against associating with non-Muslims, they are not to come in any contact with them, much less break bread with infidels. Non-Muslims are considered najes – unclean. The right of assembly is reserved for Islamic-sanctioned events, such as the numerous religious theatrics and government orchestrated demonstrations.
Religious minorities are either banned or greatly restricted in group practices, such as worship or observance of holidays. Non-approved religious groups, and that covers all who do not toe the line of the dominating Islamic sect, are harassed and disenfranchised on a graded scale. In Shi’a lands, Sunnis receive less than fair treatment. Others, such as Christians and Jews, are next in terms of exercising their rights. Then a host of other religious minorities, such as Bahá’ís and Sufis, face the severest variety of restrictions and outright persecutions.
The right to express oneself, short of “falsely shouting ‘fire’ in a crowded theater.”
Freedom of speech indeed exists in Islamic societies, as long as you sing the praises of Islam and the ruling system. Any honest criticism of the ruling system is taken as an attempt to discredit and distort facts. Woe unto anyone who dares to utter the slightest objections to the draconian Islamic laws and its primitive teachings. Expressing disagreement with denigration of women, for instance, is a sure way of incurring the wrath of the state. Islamic government and powerful Islamic organizations avidly campaign for a universal adoption of what they call blasphemy laws. They propose severe punishment for any individual or organization that in any way speaks unfavorably about Islam, Muhammad, or Islamic sanctity. Conveniently, they neglect to stipulate the same provisions for other religions.
“God does not love evil talk in public unless it is by someone who has been injured thereby.” (4:148)
Most Americans as well as the world have witnessed what is occurring in European countries. Many Muslims, unlike most other immigrant groups, refuse to assimilate into the culture of the host country in which they seek refuge. In fact, they have been explicitly told by their Islamic leaders, such as an imam or a mullah, to resist assimilation. Instead, they have created “No Go” zones in which the native police, Christians and Jews are not welcome, even if they are native in the host country.
Islamic law, under the banner of “religion,” infringes blatantly on the rights of others, particularly women. This is of imminent concern to us, watching how in some European countries where Sharia is legitimately taking root. In London, for example, there are 85 Sharia courts. Allowing even one Sharia court in the U.S. is inconceivable; it would lead to others, and ultimately, it would spread quickly unless swiftly and adequately checked.
America cannot afford to continue down this current path of appeasement, hoping that the Islam issue will simply go away by itself. It won’t and it never will. When our elected officials are unable to deal with this life-threatening matter, people become desperate and turn to charlatans and demagogues, with dire consequences.
Here is our major impediment. America, with a long history of protecting religious freedom, still clings to the “hands off” practice of leaving alone any doctrine, dogma or practice billed as religion. A thorny problem in determining what represents a religion and who is to make that call!
As things stand now, there are several boards at most levels of government, business, and community which govern our lives. These agencies are charged with the responsibility of looking after the welfare of the people they serve. The Food and Drug Administration, for instance, must pass on the safety and quality of the food we eat; the Aviation Safety Board works to ensure safe flights; a local school board strives to create the environment that best serves the educational and safety needs of the pupils. Boards serve every community and businesses of any size.
Why not have an Islamic Review Board to function as other boards do? It is long past time to establish an Islamic Review Board to investigate whether or not and once and for all if Islam is a threat to the national security of the United States. Is this an outlandishly absurd proposal? Not at all. Serious problems require equally serious solutions.
The American people must hear the truth about the nature of Islamic doctrine continually until they are totally aware of its threat to their way of life and the US Constitution. Sadly, our churches and other religious institutions do not speak up, for fear of being accused of intolerance and racism (although Islam is not a race) toward another religion. Our academics, the university teachers and professors, are utterly silent, except those leftist professors who are in bed with Islamists.
Many of our elected officials and politicians don’t even go there because they are mostly master practitioners of euphemism, hedging, double-talk, and outright deception, and they need your votes as well as your money. Many media contributors and editors refuse to acknowledge such a problem even exists. Countless entrepreneurs and businessmen dare not because they might lose customers and clientele from Muslim countries. Even ordinary workers have been advised not to ever discuss Islam issues at work.
President Donald Trump has taken the oath of office faithfully to execute the Office of President of the United States, and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. It is his duty to protect America and Americans.
Let us be clear, the United States neither wants nor needs what has been happening to various other countries in Europe with the invasion of Muslims. As previously stated, Muslims will not assimilate into the American culture or any Western culture. They come here to make Islam the law of the land.
Sharia (Islamic law) is not compatible with the United States Constitution. Islam is a political and military system masquerading as a religion. Their holy book, the Quran, condemns the infidels, practices forced conversion and uses taqiyya or dissimulation to advance Islam.
Quran (8:38-39) – “Say to those who have disbelieved, if they cease (from disbelief) their past will be forgiven… And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do.”
The Muslim Brotherhood calls for a “Civilizational-Jihad” process, in which they would destroy Western civilization from within. They said they would use the Constitution, such as the First Amendment right of Freedom of Religion, against the US to further their goal of creating a worldwide caliphate.
A Muslim belongs to the ummah, an international Islamic community. A Muslim can lie easily (taqiyya or dissimulation) to become a citizen of any country. A true Muslim does not and cannot believe in freedom of choice. In the religion of Islam, his loyalty, first and above all, is to the Islamic world community, and not to any country in which he resides. By allowing Muslims to immigrate to the West, we are literally inviting the biggest nemesis of mankind into our homes. Why? Because, Muslims, with their tribal mentality, do not become part of the society and assimilate.
Islam in its fourteen hundred years of existence has never been the religion of peace. It has been a cult of war. What we need to do is demand that politicians, Islamic apologists, and paid-for media sycophants do not abuse freedom by lying about Islam. When these people portray Islam as a religion of peace, they are lying through their teeth. Just take a quick look at Islam’s history as well as what is happening today in Islamic lands. Islam is not a religion of peace and it has never been. Islam is violent, oppressive, racist, and irrational at best.
President Trump urgently needs to establish an Islamic Review Board, tasked with a mission to ensure that “Islam” does not practice what it preaches in violation of the United States Constitution.
Truth be told: Violence is the animating force of Islam. Islam is a religion born through violence, raised by violence, thrives on violence and dies without violence.
Cicero says
This is a most stirring article – a call to arms as it were.
Europe is about to fall off the cliff into the bowels of aislsm
Let not the same fate befall USA
J D S says
Just some great writing here and should be plastered in every newspaper in the Free World and spoken on every radio and TV station…Will that happen? Of course not……we have gone too far to the left of center…our CENTER is so corrupted that take over Is inevitable…Unless…….
Laurence Jarvik says
Use precedent of US Occupation of Japan treatment of Shinto religion as model…see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinto_Directive. Should have done this already in Iraq and Afghanistan, IMHO.
eduardo odraude says
Some day the World War II method of secularizing Shinto might be attempted, no doubt in updated form, on Islam, but I wonder if replication is really feasible. Shinto, unless I’m mistaken, had little written doctrine. I don’t think Shinto ideologically or via verbatim words of God demands theocracy. Unfortunately, Islam does clearly lay down a highly articulated and extremely detailed set of “divine” laws that are to supersede “man-made” laws. Shinto could be used for politics but was not in its core a political doctrine, as I recall. I’m not aware of Shinto devotees in Japan seeking today to have the emperor acknowledged again in Japan as a God. By contrast we know of tens of thousands of Muslims who are unhappy with the un-Islamic character of earthly governments to the point of engaging in violent jihad to usher in more Islamic kinds of rule.
With Islam, instead of the method used with Shinto, perhaps the containment method used on the Soviet Union should be tried. There were not dozens of Shinto-majority nations that had to be secularized, but there are dozens of Muslim-majority nations, so the notion of forcing secularization on that huge universe seems unrealistic. And Islamic totalitarian expansion will not be stopped by secularizing only just one or two Muslim-majority states. But the Soviet containment model also has its limits with respect to Islam, because the Soviets were not suicidal and therefore could be deterred. Jihadists are happy to flush themselves down the toilet if they can drag the world with them.
Still, containment is beginning, here and there. What is needed is a moratorium on further immigration of Muslims to non-Muslim nations until such time as a majority of Muslim-majority nations protect freedom of religion.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Amil imani, you must be too ignorant about sharia because you don’t know it. It is from sharia that such things like fundamental Human Rights were borrowed and adopted in the west. All such things like freedom of religion, right to life,right to human dignity, protection of property or economic rights, came from basic objectives of Sharia known as maqasid sharia (the objectives of Sharia). See an article “Islamic law origin of the common law) “by John makdisi published in the law journal of North Carolina university.
Mr Imani are you still a member of mujahidee Haq carrying out terrorist attacks on Iran or you are now working directly for evil United States to sabotage Your own country Iran? A fool!!
don vito says
itace, how is the health of your kufr family members?
katherine says
Hold that a minute. We understand that Human Rights are only for Humans which encompasses only those who believe in Mo and Allah – all others are animals or even lower than animals so they so not qualify for HUMAN rights.
Oh and animals like women have no rights. See – we really DO understand Islam.
Elee says
I scanned every Comment to this post and I think yours is the best and most succinct. Good work & congratulations..
Amil Imani says
I want to prove that you are a Muslim terrorist and a liar: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/22427
People this thug is an agent of the Islamic Republic. Please report him if you can. CC FBI
Guy Forester says
Amil,
His level of logic and reasoning shows he is probably lacking some gray matter. I would think he is more comic relief than a threat. However, he still bears watching.
Amil Imani says
Guy, I agree
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Amil imani, you are lost believing that evil United States is a policeman of the world. I am not one of those who can be intimidated by American idiocy of surveillance by FBI. A fool!!
J D S says
Oh Ibrahim..You can be sure you are being watched and monitored as all of your ilk are.
gravenimage says
The appalling ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
Amil imani, you must be too ignorant about sharia because you don’t know it. It is from sharia that such things like fundamental Human Rights were borrowed and adopted in the west.
……………………………..
Just grotesque Taqiyya. Muslims countries, of course, regularly rate *dead last* in Human Rights. The Infidel West ranks first in almost every category. Why would this be the case if Human Rights were Islamic?
And Human Rights are ultimately derived from Judeo-Christian values, not the oppressive horrors of Shari’ah.
More:
All such things like freedom of religion, right to life,right to human dignity, protection of property or economic rights, came from basic objectives of Sharia known as maqasid sharia (the objectives of Sharia).
……………………………..
Just ludicrous. The only freedom of religion under Islam is the “freedom” for Muslims to impose their vicious creed on everyone, including Infidels. There is no right to life in places where Infidels may be raped and murdered by Muslims without penalty. There is no protection for property rights in places where Muslims have the right to rob Infidels, and even enslave them.
Ibrahim itace muhammed *himself* has affirmed that Muslims have the right to rape, enslave, and slaughter Infidels.
More:
See an article “Islamic law origin of the common law) “by John makdisi published in the law journal of North Carolina university.
……………………………..
This is, in fact, notorious whitewash and Taqiyya from Makdisi. He’s just a useful idiot for surpremacist Muslims.
More:
Mr Imani are you still a member of mujahidee Haq carrying out terrorist attacks on Iran or you are now working directly for evil United States to sabotage Your own country Iran? A fool!!
……………………………..
Of course, this is calumny–and a ludicrous claim Ibrahim itace muhammed has made before.
The idea that anyone opposed to the “Human Rights” of Iran hanging gay people and stoning women to death is a “terrorist” is just grotesque projection.
gravenimage says
And one more thing–the idea that the only people who oppose savage Shari’ah law are those who don;t know it is grotesque.
As though being exposed to Muslims amputating the hands of petty thieves, flogging those who resist Hijab, throwing gay people off tall buildings, and stoning rape victims to death is supposed to make civilized people feel better about such horrors. *Ugh*.
J D S says
Thst’s putting Ibrahim in his place Graven……well maybe I know a better place for him..her or it whatever Ibrahim might be.
gravenimage says
Thank you, J D S.
Rarely says
Ibrahim.
What you are shouts out so loudly I can’t hear what you are saying.
Amil Imani says
This thug is a sleeper cell. Please report this terrorist
gravenimage says
He’s an ugly piece of work.
FYI says
islam doesn’t even conform to God’s Commandments!
allah’s claim that the koran confirms the Torah and Gospel:
Koran 3:3 is a PROVABLE LIE
Although claiming to have written that “mithraist” Bible of yours{koran 3:3},allah the false deceiver god of the moslems teaches things in his unholy koran that are condemned by the Commandments of God in Exodus 20.
The demonic,putrid filth of sharia law along with your false child-raping psychopath “prophet” do not come from God but from evil.
You are just not evolved enough intellectually to figure it out:this was shown when you spent months attacking something{that “mithraist” Bible}that allah claims to have written {koran 3;3}!
Joe Felon says
Answer me this…if Islam and sharia is so supportive of human rights, why was the UN charter on human rights rejected and replaced by the OIC in favor the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights? Only those who belong to the death cult masquerading as a legitimate religion know as Islam have any rights under the OIC charter. All others, including non-Muslims and woman, are subjected to intolerable descrimination, while gays can expect nothing but death. Islamic law, or sharia, is its only reference thereby leading to practices completely unacceptable in the West and those who truly support human rights. You know all this is true so you play the usual Muslim game of spreading lies and propaganda while taking on the role of the victim. And if you truly believe Islam influenced Western Civilization in any postive fashion you are completely out of your fucking mind.
eduardo odraude says
Even Muslim men do not have the full panoply of rights as understood in the UN Declaration. NO freedom of speech or freedom of religion in Islam. Even if you are a Muslim male. It’s true of course that the situation is worse if you are in any other category.
Michael says
We used to have something like an Islamic Review Board.
It was called the Spanish Inquisition.
Clive Stephen Delmonte says
We are all familiar with the behaviour of jihadists who claim to follow Sharia’s legal imperatives. The jihadists are murdering ordinary decent civilized people all over the world. Fantasies about what the West has learned from Islamic societies shows that the jihadists and their apologists have no knowledge of the development of Western civilization.
AD D says
You sir are a deceiver! Your evil ideology compels you to do evil and the world can no longer deny this fact. Countries are kicking out your kind because they want no part of your uncivilized ideology.
J D S says
No Ibrahim nothing was adopted from Islam…Human rights follows the teachings of the Messiah, Jesus the Christ…your thinking is lost to the past centuries of Islamic dregs
Savvy Kafir says
An Islamic review board would not be enough, in the long run. Even if Muslims were forced to behave themselves for a while, once their numbers grow large enough in any given country, they will do what they please — at the expense of everyone else.
If the civilized world is to remain civilized, the Muslims must go. Anything less than that solution will ultimately fail.
StellaSaidSo says
+1
If we had enforced our laws right from the start we would not be in the mess we are now. Once you have given a dog a treat that he knows that dogs of a different breed don’t get, you will have the devil’s job taking it back from him.
Amil Imani says
I want to prove that you are a Muslim
liar: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/22427
People this thug is an agent of the Islamic Republic. Please report him if you can. CC FBI
gravenimage says
Amil Imani, I doubt that Ibrahim itace muhammed is Iranian. He has said that he is a Nigerian Muslim, and this does indeed appear to be the case from his Facebook page:
He is an ugly Muslim supremacist and supporter of Jihad, though–and he supports Shari’ah *everywhere*.
Amil Imani says
He is an Arab, not Iranian. He gets paid to disturb.
gravenimage says
Why Not an Islamic Review Board?
……………….
Yes–brutal Shari’ah law does not belong anywhere in the West.
Indiana Tom says
Well, we could have an Islamic review Board which is chaired by Muslims who are intimate with the workings of Jihad. What could possibly go wrong?
I think progressive France has started down this path.
gravenimage says
Grim thought.
Garfield says
Please do crowd funding and buy a full page in the NY times. Print this in the NYT!
This message needs to reach everyone.
Linda M Clark says
I wholly agree with this article and the ideas behind it. And a “review board” is an excellent idea, but WHO to be on this board? It was already put before Congress that Congressional members learn about Islamic Ideology, and they turned down the chance! Imagine? Go figure!
The key to eradicating Islamic influence in the West is DEMANDING our Governments study what Islam REALLY is- A complete Governmental System, and proclaiming it as such. No Nation allows Foreign Nationals to hold political positions WITHIN its government. Because Muslims pledge their allegiance to Islam, their “separation of church and state” CANNOT happen. In their minds and hearts, church and state are ONE thing.
No Muslims should be voted into any political or public position. No Muslim should be allowed to vote, because they are not TRULY citizens of USA even if they are born on USA soil. (Which is why that law about being BORN here by foreign parents “makes you a citizen” needs to be repealed. They need to apply for citizenship. And if they are Muslim, they would be denied due to the nature of the Islamic ideology of world domination.)
Amil Imani says
Dear Mrs. Clark,
You are absolutely correct. Thank you for your valuable comment. Yes, many POLITICIANS MUST READ THIS PROPOSITION.
REPS,
AMIL
Lu says
“POLITICIANS MUST READ THIS PROPOSITION”.
Ain’t gonna help or solve anything. The politicians already know – they are not THAT dumb.
Actually, nothing is going to help and nothing is going to change until the situation reaches a point of eruption – only then the (hopefully still majority of) non-cultists will start fighting the cultists.
And that is going to be a bloody fight – here in America certainly involving firearms; hence, war of sorts, street shootings; all what we read in history books will be again out there.
What a future our politicians have prepared for us.
gravenimage says
We can hold politicians to account; and if they do not respond, then vote in better ones. The idea that there is nothing between rolling over for Islam and fighting in the streets is, of course, quite false.
Lu says
GI, only time will tell.
Gates of Vienna has quite some erudite stuff on this, e.g. what is the extent of curtailment of our fundamental liberties we still enjoy in order to solve the said “cult” problem – dictatorship of sorts is one of the variants coming to mind.
Voting “better ones” is a wishful thinking – sorry. Look at Germany, recent election in Sweden: the voters are still not realizing the magnitude of decay their countries are in. In some way this all is tantamount to the late 1930s: appeasement was the #1 political action.
“Voting in better ones” is just a late response to actual and present danger; the danger is growing much faster than the very humble results of “voting in better ones” can ever accomplish.
Sorry again for my utter skepticism.
gravenimage says
Infidels need to be better educated about the threat of Islam,Really, that is what Jihad Watch is for.
Linda M Clark says
Thank you Mr. Imani. I was pleased to hear Mr. Spencer add more language of Islam being a “State” in one of his recent videos. And Dr.Bill Warner does speak and teach that Islam is Political, but no one has yet, in a single article DEFINED how Islam is not just a religion but a Governmental System. Islam has courts, laws, schools, banking system, a State Religion, a state flag, an army(actually ALL Muslims are commanded to fight in the way of Allah by any capacity possible). Islam has Leaders, a Constitution, cultural norms, special food preferences: the WHOLE kit and kaboodle for making a group of people a NATION in itself. And Muslims even tell us they belong to the Umma, and not the chunk of ground WE call our country.
To me, CHANGING OUR NARRATIVE is critical to get all Americans to understand the Statehood of Islam. Right now EVERYONE is Calling Islam a religion!! That has to change. I try my darndest to call Islam a Nation. Even the words “Theocracy” and “ideology” or “political ideology” are too nebulous and non specific for the average person. Define something accurately and UNDERSTANDING FOLLOWS.
Thanks for your work Sir!
Guy Forester says
I do not think we need a review board. We have a Bill of Rights that clearly protect the rights of Americans and limits government as you have delineated. What we really need is a whole new generation of citizens, jurists, and legislators that understand our constitution and bill of rights and will support them, not try to morph them into something they were never intended to be.
Linda Clark says
Guy, I completely agree with your statement, BUT, we really cannot wait for what you said to happen. And even if POOF! a group of people stepped in who were dedicated to our Constitution, that STILL does not mean they would UNDERSTAND the subversiveness of Islam. There would still be Muslim “citizens” who get voted into office with the goal of fulfilling Islamic Law. Unless Americans do something blatantly anti Islam, like proclaiming Islam a Nation within our Nation, we can’t stop the Islamization process. ALL THE PEOPLE NEED TO UNDERSTAND ISLAM for what it is- a governmental system, and boot it out!
Malcolm Jackson says
This will be the way to stop the Mu-slim conquest of the UK and get a true Brexit.
With Gerard Batten running UKIP and Tommy Robinson coming aboard, UKIP could very well win the votes of over 430,000 Sikhs and 1,000.000 Hindus living in the UK. That is not to mention the many millions of non-Muslim voters who are beginning to realise what an evil cult Islam is. Of course, with our votes secret, many Muslims opposed to Islam, would vote for UKIP, as many Muslims voted for Marine Le Pen in France. UKIP and the UK can only be on a winner with Gerard Batten and Tommy Robinson.
In the USA, is Donald Trump aware that Nigel Farage is an ardent supporter of Islam?
Brenda says
An Islamic Review Board sounds great but it would never pass muster. What we need to do is demand the passage the following into federal law:
The United State of America finds that it shall be the public policy of the United States and it’s territories, to protect its citizens from the application of foreign laws when the application of a foreign law will result in the violation of a right guaranteed by the constitution of the United States, including but not limited to due process, freedom of religion, speech or press and any right of privacy or marriage as specifically defined by the United States, it’s territories and State Constitutions.
The United States of America full recognizes the right to contract freely under the law and also recognizes that this right may be reasonably and rationally circumscribed pursuant to the national interest to protect and promote rights and privileges granted under the United States Constitution, including but not limited to due process, freedom of religion, speech or press and any right of privacy or marriage as specifically defined by the United States, it’s territories and State Constitutions.
As used in the Act, “foreign law, legal code or system” means any law, legal code or system of a jurisdiction established outside the United States, it’s territories or a State under it’s jurisdiction, including but not limited to, international organizations and tribunals and applied by that jurisdiction’s courts, administrative bodies or other formal or informal tribunals. For the purpose of this act, foreign law shall not mean, nor shall it include any laws of the Native American tribes.
As used in this Act, “religious organization” means any church, seminary, synagogue, temple, mosque, religious order, religious corporation, association, or society, whose identity is distinctive in terms of common religious creed, beliefs, doctrines, practices or rituals of any faith or denomination including any organization qualifying as a church or religious organization under section 501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code.
Any court, arbitration, tribunal or administrative agency ruling or decision shall violate the public policy of the United States, it’s territories or State Constitutions and be void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal or administrative agency bases it s rulings or decisions in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any law, legal code or system that would not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the fundamental liberties, rights and privileges granted under the United States, it’s territories or State Constitutions including but not limited to due process, freedom of religion, speech or press any any right of privacy or marriage as specifically defined by the United States, it’s territories or State constitutions.
A contract or contractual provision which provides for the choice of a law, legal code or system to govern some or all of the disputes between the parties adjudicated by a court of law or by an arbitration panel arising from the contract mutually agreed upon shall violate the public policy of the United States, it’s territories or State and be void and unenforceable if the law, legal code or system chosen includes or incorporates any substantive or procedural law as applied to the dispute at issue that would not grant the parties the same fundamental liberties, rights and privileges granted under the United States, it’s territories or State Constitutions including but not limited to due process, freedom of religion, speech or press and any right of privacy or marriage as specifically defined by the United States, it’s territories or of a State constitution.
A contract or contractual provision (if severable) which provides for a jurisdiction for purposes of granting the courts or arbitration panels in personam jurisdiction over the parties to adjudicate any dispute arising from the contract mutually agreed upon shall violate the public policy of the United States, it’s territories or of the State and be void and unenforceable if the jurisdiction chosen includes any law, legal code or system as applied to the dispute at issue that would not grant the parties the same fundamental liberties, rights and privileges granted under the US, it’s territories and State Constitutions, including but not limited to due process, freedom of religion, speech or press and any right of privacy or marriage as specifically defined by the US, it’s territories and State Constitutions.
If a resident or citizen of the United States, it’s territories or a State subject to personal jurisdiction of the United States, its territories or of a State seeks to maintain litigation, arbitration, agency or similarly binding proceedings in the United States, its territories or State and if the courts of the United States, its territories or State find that granting a claim of forum non conveniens or a related claims violates or would likely violate the fundamental liberties, right and privileges granted under the United States, its territories or State Constitutions of the non-claimant in the foreign forum with respect to the matter in dispute, then it is the public policy of the United States, its’ territories or State that the claim shall be denied.
Without prejudice to any legal right, this act shall not apply to a corporation, partnership, limited liability company, business association or other legal entity that contracts to subject itself to foreign law in a jurisdiction other than the United States, it’s territories or a State.
No court or arbitrator shall interpret this Act to limit the right of any person(s) to the free exercise of religion as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the US, it’s territories or State Constitutions. No court shall interpret this Act to require or authorize any court to adjudicate or prohibit any religious organization from adjudicating: ecclesiastical matters, including but not limited to the election, appointment, calling, discipline, dismissal, removal or excommunication of a member, officer, official, priest, nun, monk, pastor, rabbi, imam or member of the clergy of the religious organization or determination or interpretation of the doctrine of the religious organization where adjudication by a court would violate the prohibition of the establishment clause of the First Amendment of the United State, it’s territories or violate the Constitution of a State.
This statute shall not be interpreted by any court to conflict with any federal treaty or other international agreement to which the United States is a party to the extent that such treaty or international agreement preempts or is superior to state law on the matter at issue.
As far as Muslims non-assimilation, we need to adopt the Swiss method. If Muslims, or anyone else, wants to stay in Switzerland, they have to PROVE THEY HAVE FULLY ASSIMILATED INTO SWISS SOCIETAL NORMS OR LEAVE!
Ole Pederson says
If the Nazi party NSDAP can be outlawed (at least in Germany) and made illegal, then all the more it should be possible to outlaw and ban a pseudo-religious polity-cult holding opinions much worse on every single topic, and many more!O
dan christensen says
“This is an urgent call to all free people to rise and defeat the Islamic jihadists who are marching under the banner of the religion to subdue all non-Muslims.”
Sorry chaps – the call must be only to all free muslim people. The West does not have to rise. Christian countries have for 1400 years succeeded in keeping islam away from the civilised world.
Do not take the fight for defeating islamic aggression to countries outside the islamic world. The struggle against jihadism and evil political islam is primarily the responsibility af honest moderate muslims.
All infidel free people should always keep muslim civil war away from the West. The civilised christian world would gladly support the efforts of moderate islam, but should reduce actual physical fighting jihadists to a minimum in christian lands.
The greatest mistake ever done by the West is to let in islam – before islam has been thoroughly cleaned of death, hate and violence.