Interfaith dialogue.
“Scots cagefighter ‘left for dead’ after cabbie beat him unconscious with crowbar,” by Jack Longstaff, Daily Record, October 29, 2018:
A Scots backpacker has told how he was “left for dead” in the street after he was brutally attacked by a taxi driver with a crowbar.
Former cagefighter Euan Fraser, 30, said the cabbie beat him unconscious on his doorstep leaving him with a bleed on the brain.
He claims the attack happened after he got out of the car in Melbourne following what he thought was a harmless discussion about religion.
Euan, from Dundee, Scotland, was knocked out and medics did tests which showed he was struck with a thick metal pole, like a crowbar.
He was forced to shell out £4,000 for his medical treatment and now suffers with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Describing the incident, Euan said: “As I got out of the taxi I just heard footsteps behind me and heard a loud bang.
“Then I felt this immense pain in my head and I was knocked clean out.
“I was laid into when I was on the floor. I was left laying there in a pool of blood. He left me for dead….
Euan, who stands 6ft 5ins tall, flagged down the yellow cab after a night out with a friend in Melbourne in June last year.
He recalls how he and the taxi driver spoke “at length” about the driver’s Muslim background and he became visibly annoyed when Euan said he was an atheist.
Euan, who was working on a farm at the time, argued that religion had “played a part in causing deaths and wars” throughout history.
Architecture student Euan said: “He didn’t like it at all when I started expressing my views. He started to preach his religion on me.
“I argued that science was responsible for evolution rather than religion, which he didn’t like either.
“I tried to change the conversation but he kept going on about it. I could see he was getting wound up.”
He got out of the car expecting the cabbie to drive off when he was smashed over the head and “beaten to a pulp”….
Euan sustained bruised ribs, a battered shoulder, multiple cuts to his face and a bleed on the brain during the sickening attack….
Police investigated but have yet to trace the taxi driver….
CogitoErgoSum says
The name of the religion in English is SUBMISSION and Quran 9:29 explains what the followers of the religion are supposed to do to make others submit also. Those of us who have not submitted need always to keep that in mind. Trusting that a Muslim will always be peaceful towards you is to a big mistake. Fighting is their duty to their god …. and for them the end justifies the means.
Roger woodhouse says
Why else do you think western governments refuse to discuss Islam and have introduced all these so called ‘hate speech ‘laws.They are frightened to take on this so called religion in fear of upsetting them.They know that it will end violently with the mussies taking to the streets if any kind of restriction is put on it.We face massive disruption and possible civil war here in Britain very soon unless we Brits grow some backbone by voting UKIP and electing MEN with the guts to face reality.Islam must be removed from our countries here and Europe.Unless action is taken very soon we face a very bleak future.God bless Donald Trump.Oh how we need him in Britain!
Tony Holland says
Spot on with your observations,it is my ‘hobby horse’,stop returning the liars,cheats and appeasers to Westminster FOR EVER OR NOTHING WILL EVER CHANGE,give support to a party that recognises the dire situation we ALL face,–the scourge of the muslim/islamic/sharia cult which threatens our very being.Oh yes if ever we needed another Trump it is now,thought maybe Farage could be ‘our’ man but I’m afraid he has been seduced by the media and holds back from speaking about this cancer,this invasion by the subhumans.UKIP seems the only plausible choice especially if they can gt TR on board to persuade other fringe organisations to join the UKIP charge.
Joss says
I take it, Roger, that when you refer to ‘men with guts’ you aren’t thinking of our spineless MPs?!
Roger woodhouse says
No I certainly wasnt!Our parliamentary system is not geared toward encouraging such men I’m afraid.Only such men are required in times of war.
BC says
Never turn your back on a Muslim especially one with whom you have had an argument .
rod says
What an extraordinary coincidence.
A taxidriver, allegedly a Muslim attacks somebody in Australia (where?) nearly 18 months ago (when?), and makes big news to Jihad fanatics. Lots and lots of peace loving disciples eager to condemn such terrible violence.
And a few days ago, somebody (perhaps a god-fearing citizen of that peace loving land governed by the world’s most famous pussy-grabber) enters a synagogue with a submachine gun and kills eleven people.
The strange thing is that one of these events, yes, the one that occurred a year and a half ago, is big news to Muslim haters. The other is apparently a ho-hum every day event in the land of peace and harmony. Not a mention to enlighten jihad-watchers to real events in the real world. Strange indeed.
Spiritual crisis Mr Spencer?
gravenimage says
The appalling rod is claiming that we “hate Muslims” if we oppose a peaceful man being savagely beaten and left for dead. *Ugh*.
And then he blames the American president for the appalling attack on a Synagogue–even thought the shooter castigated Trump for *not* hating Jews.
Mark Swan says
Rod’s version of the real world is fictional—something does not have
to be true for him to believe in it— he seems able to ignore the 33,800
Jihad attacks since 9/11/01, which translates into many tens of thousands
of individuals, now, dead and those suffering, all thanks to Islam and its
followers, all the failed attempts and success by Muslims to do harm in
this very country—he castigates the Nationally Elected President,
who, is trying to do his job. Rod this is strange indeed.
Rod says
Missed the point, gi. Again. But You really do have a gift for putting words into the moths of others..
But where is Mr Spencer’s respond to thie Pittsburgh outrage? Or any of the other atrocities committed with horrifying regularity by non-Muslims? Lack of space? Or the “spiritual crisis”?
No, let us focus on crimes, large and trivial, committed by one and only one segment of society, preferably in Poland, or Tasmania, or Swaziland.
gravenimage says
“Rod” wrote:
Missed the point, gi. Again. But You really do have a gift for putting words into the moths of others..
…………………….
Notice that “Rod” is unable to cite a single thing I have gotten wrong. No surprise there.
His only purpose here is to distract from the horrors of Jihad terror–which have recently topped 34,000 attacks just since 9/11.
More:
But where is Mr Spencer’s respond (sic) to thie (sic) Pittsburgh outrage? Or any of the other atrocities committed with horrifying regularity by non-Muslims? Lack of space? Or the “spiritual crisis”?
…………………….
This is like castigating Churchill for daring to say anything critical about the Nazis, rather than spending his time condemning street crime in London.
Jihad is the greatest threat in the world today–demanding that Robert Spencer ignore it is just disgusting. Jihad Watch is here to educate Infidels about this threat–and will continue to do so, no matter how much it enrages “Rod”.
More:
No, let us focus on crimes, large and trivial, committed by one and only one segment of society, preferably in Poland, or Tasmania, or Swaziland.
…………………….
Interesting phrasing, actually. Whether he intended to or not, “Rod” is actually confirming that Jihad is a global phenomenon–indeed, there are few places that are safe from Jihad now–and this is only getting worse as more Muslims flood into the West.
But then, that’s how “Rod” likes it…
And does “Rod” consider a Muslim nearly beating a peaceful man to death for affirming he is an Atheist to be trivial? Good God…
gravenimage says
Agreed, Mark.
rod says
Dear graven image
Notice, you say, that “Rod” is unable to cite a single thing I have gotten wrong.
Well, that is because I haven’t tried, and because this isn’t about you (sorry to disappoint you).
But if you insist –
1. No, my only purpose here is NOT to distract from the horrors of Jihad terror, and you have no grounds for such a claim.
2. My comments are certainly NOT like “castigating Churchill for daring to say anything critical about the Nazis”. As you should know, the Nazis were dropping bombs on Churchill’s country. Whereas, it’s Muslims who are having bobs dropped on them. So your analogy is rather misplaced.
3. “Jihad is the greatest threat in the world today–demanding that Robert Spencer ignore it is just disgusting” you say. I have NOT demanded any such thing, as you must know.
4. does “Rod” consider a Muslim nearly beating a peaceful man to death for affirming he is an Atheist to be trivial? Well, no, I do NOT consider it trivial, and did NOT say so.
But, hasn’t it occurred to any of you that we don’t know that the man was a Muslim, or even who he was? We don’t know whether the victim was really a “peaceful man”. We don’t know what really happened, whether there was provocation or injuries on both sides. We don’t know the results of any police investigation. And since it happened nearly 18 months ago, it’s a little odd that it is presented here as an undeniable account as if of a recent occurrence. Easily recognisable as third rate journalism. But good enough for you and your fellow believers?
So, gi, my original purpose was not to attack you, and it’s disappointing that instead of addressing the issues raised, you respond by attacking me. Not effective, not mature, not even accurate.
gravenimage says
“rod” wrote:
Dear graven image
Notice, you say, that “Rod” is unable to cite a single thing I have gotten wrong.
Well, that is because I haven’t tried, and because this isn’t about you (sorry to disappoint you).
But if you insist –
1. No, my only purpose here is NOT to distract from the horrors of Jihad terror, and you have no grounds for such a claim.
…………………………
In “rod’s” entire posting history here, he has never done anything *but* try to distract from Jihad terror. Let’s see him cite any of his postings that do anything else.
More:
2. My comments are certainly NOT like “castigating Churchill for daring to say anything critical about the Nazis”. As you should know, the Nazis were dropping bombs on Churchill’s country. Whereas, it’s Muslims who are having bobs (sic) dropped on them. So your analogy is rather misplaced.
…………………………
Churchill was critical of the Nazis long before they began dropping bombs on Britain. In fact, he had been warning of the threat of Fascism for many years. That “rod” is pretending that he wasn’t just shows how incredibly dishonest he is. No surprise there, though.
Incidentally, my mother–who joined the British Army in WWII as a young woman–survived a direct hit on her office building, which destroyed the hallway outside the office. Luckily, the bomb was a dud, or it would have been much worse. My aunt–also in the British Army–drove supply trucks in blackout conditions between London and the mouth of the Thames. This road was also regularly bombed by the Nazis.
And the claim that Muslims have never attacked the West is just grotesque–does “rod” wand us to forget 9/11, the Madrid train bombings, the London Tube bombings, the Paris attacks, Ft. Hood, et al ad nauseum? Of course he does.
And the claim that this never happened, but that the filthy Infidels are engaged in unprovoked attacks on Muslims is just calumny.
More:
3. “Jihad is the greatest threat in the world today–demanding that Robert Spencer ignore it is just disgusting” you say. I have NOT demanded any such thing, as you must know.
…………………………
“rod” has done nothing but castigate Robert Spencer and Jihad Watch for reporting on Jihad terror.
I suppose on can argue over whether this is a demand or not…
More:
4. does “Rod” consider a Muslim nearly beating a peaceful man to death for affirming he is an Atheist to be trivial? Well, no, I do NOT consider it trivial, and did NOT say so.
…………………………
Since “rod” said that Jihad Watch reported on “on crimes, large and trivial, committed by one and only one segment of society” this was definitely a reasonable question as to whether he considered this trivial–certainly, in three posts he has still not said anything critical of this horrific attack. But then, why would he?
More:
But, hasn’t it occurred to any of you that we don’t know that the man was a Muslim, or even who he was? We don’t know whether the victim was really a “peaceful man”. We don’t know what really happened, whether there was provocation or injuries on both sides. We don’t know the results of any police investigation.
…………………………
The victim himself said that the driver talked about his Muslim background, as well as his rage when the victim said that he was an Atheist. While there is–theoretically–the slightest chance that the victim was attacked by someone else, this seems damned unlikely–especially given that the driver appears to have disappeared immediately following the attack.
Of course this points to the Muslim driver being the perp–but “rod” desperately hopes we won’t notice any of this.
More:
And since it happened nearly 18 months ago, it’s a little odd that it is presented here as an undeniable account as if of a recent occurrence. Easily recognisable as third rate journalism. But good enough for you and your fellow believers?
…………………………
This paper has been around since 1895. And the idea that the journalist is lying about when this incident took place is quite false–the article openly notes that it was June of last year. Does “rod” think that we can’t notice this?
More:
So, gi, my original purpose was not to attack you, and it’s disappointing that instead of addressing the issues raised, you respond by attacking me. Not effective, not mature, not even accurate.
…………………………
I never said that “rod’s” original purpose was to attack me–what a straw man argument. I said that his only purpose here was to distract from Jihad–and that has not changed.
And I certainly did address the issues that “rod” raised–as well as noting why “rod” likely raised them in the first place.
And I was not attacking “rod” as such–I was replying to his false Tu Quoque and distraction from Jihad. Other than his ugly posting history, I don’t know “rod” from a hole in the ground–including whether his name is rod–nor do I much care. His posts speak for themselves.
And–again–“rod” is unable to note anything I have said here that is inaccurate.
And “rod’s” belief–or hope, at any rate–that my taking him to task for his sand throwing is quite baseless–as is his claim that challenging apologia for Jihad is not mature.
gravenimage says
One small correction: “And “rod’s” belief–or hope, at any rate–that my taking him to task for his sand throwing is quite baseless–as is his claim that challenging apologia for Jihad is not mature” should have read, “And “rod’s” belief–or hope, at any rate–that my taking him to task for his sand throwing is necessarily ineffective is quite baseless–as is his claim that challenging apologia for Jihad is not mature”.
Carol the 1st says
Rod…the site is called Jihad Watch and not Jew-Hater Watch because the majority here aren’t Jews and besides watching muslim jihadists likely encompasses 99% of the threats to the Jews anyway (such hatred being insitutionalized in their spiritual guide book and all).
And I don’t think graven image has a gift for “putting words into other people’s mouths”; I think she just has a gift for pointing out their “shadow” (the one they’re inclined not to publicly acknowledge):
SHADOW (psychology) … Carl Jung stated the shadow to be the unknown dark side of the personality. According to Jung, the shadow, in being instinctive and irrational, is prone to psychological projection, in which a perceived personal inferiority is recognized as a perceived moral deficiency in someone else.
Sounds kinda like a real “spiritual crisis”.
gravenimage says
+1
Mark Swan says
Thank you gravenimage and Carol the 1st, for not allowing this nonsense to stand.
gravenimage says
Thank you so much, Mark.
And I agree with you about Carol’s fine contributions here.
infidel says
SURPRISE SURPRISE SURPRISE…. the less said the better..
infidel says
Another Islamic TRUISM from the annals of the infidel: How to make a Muslim mad with murderous rage??
U do not even have to insult the prophet or Islam.. All U have to do is pray to Ur own God fervently in front of the Muslim and that is enough to make him into a violent beast…I have seen this happening many times by my own eyes and also from other reports..
mortimer says
“Killing KAFIRS (infidels) is a small matter to us.” – Tabari IX: 69
dumbledoresarmy says
Or, as in this case, identify yourself – calmly and rationally – as an *atheist*. That’s all *this* Scottish bloke did.
One hopes that there is CCTV footage from the area where this bloke first got into the cab.
“Euan, who stands 6ft 5ins tall, flagged down the yellow cab after a night out with a friend in Melbourne in June last year.”
WHERE did he flag down the cab?
If the exact location can be identified there is probably security-camera footage. And if there is, then the cab might be identifiable… if it has a license number….
Another line that I hope the police are pursuing is this: there is a finite number of cabs in Melbourne.
There *must* be a list of drivers, held by the Yellow Cab taxi company.
Go through the lot… and investigate EVERY driver that has a recognisably Islamic name.
Because this driver is a menace to the public.
If he would sneak up behind an inoffensive paying passenger – I BET he did it after the fare was handed over!! – and try to MURDER him with a crowbar, then he has no business driving a cab in Melbourne.
Yellow Cabs (it’s a company) needs to clean house. NO . MORE. MUSLIMS.
(Incidentally, this same driver is no doubt the kind of Muslim who will harass, molest or even abduct and rape a female passenger, especially if she’s a bit intoxicated and off her guard.)
gravenimage says
+1
eduardo odraude says
Islam is totalitarian. The other major religions are not.
Islam should be resisted as Nazism and communism were resisted.
The main task, perhaps, is to develop a regular daily study of the core texts of Islam, even just 5 minutes daily, so that one can then more effectively educate others. Qur’an, the Bukhari Hadith, and the earliest biography by Ibn Ishaq.
Donate to Robert Spencer’s AFDI and join Brigitte Gabriel’s Act for America.
eduardo odraude says
Free online access to Qur’an, Hadith, and earliest Muslim biography (Sira) of Muhammad can be found by clicking around here: http://www.quotingislam.blogspot.com
5 minutes a day with online Qur’an, Hadith, Sira
Carol the 1st says
Thank you Eduardo, i plan to set my mental alarm for this.
eduardo odraude says
I hope they find the would-be murderer of Muhammad. Perhaps there is a decent chance, since they have some data to work with.
revereridesagain says
How could they not have traced the cabbie, though? It’s described as a “yellow cab” which suggests it’s a legitimate company, how can they not have a record of who that was?
eduardo odraude says
Good question.
gravenimage says
I’m sure there was. The implication is that the Muslim quit his job. Whether he also left the country is another question…
Peggy says
Even if he quit his job, his details remain on file. He didn’t leave his house as well.
They can find him if they want to.
gravenimage says
I hope they do find him.
Peggy says
gravenimage says
Oct 31, 2018 at 8:53 pm
I hope they do find him.
=====================
Seeing how this happened over a year ago I don’t like the chances.
Cabs are fitted with cameras, GPS tracking and there is no way that a cab company can’t identify the cab that arrived at that address.
It’s painfully clear that police never even looked for him.
God help he driver if it he was not a Muslim and the passenger was.
gravenimage says
Peggy–grimly you are probably right.
eduardo odraude says
I meant “murderer for Muhammad” not “murderer of Muhammad.”
dumbledoresarmy says
And if they can find the *crowbar* – if it wasn’t left at the crime scene – then it should have the victim’s DNA on it.
gravenimage says
True, DDA.
Krishna says
World’s most horrible interfaith dialogue would be this
CogitoErgoSum says
This is the dialogue prescribed by Allah for Muslims to have with the “infidels” — offer to let them surrender to you or beat them over the head.
revereridesagain says
That’s why the “interfaith dialogues” arranged by Christians and Jews in the West with Muslims are always one-sided. No one is allowed to question Islam. Eager to please, the tolerant Westerners go along with this farce and weaken their own positions, so that now we have Islam infiltrating churches and synagogues all over the place and clergy who speak out are shouted down by their own congregations.
Michael Copeland says
Atheists have to be put to death under Sharia.
Saudi Arabia has a track record of just such executions.
Not believing in Allah amonts to blasphemy.
Any muslim is entitled to kill a blasphemer without penalty.
That is Sharia.
PRCS says
And, in “moderate” Indonesia:
“Citra is an Indonesian atheist who assumes two identities to find a place in a society that cannot accept people who doubt religions, let alone atheists.”
Indonesian secularists and atheists live under the shadow of stigma
http://theconversation.com/indonesian-secularists-and-atheists-live-under-the-shadow-of-stigma-82697
PRCS says
Now, wait a minute.
They can’t figure out who the cabbie was? Or they can’t find him?
Did he bolt from Oz to a Muslim “safe space”?
Ellie says
Nothing like haveing the fear of “allah” beaten into you by a religious ”refugee” who has entered your country supposedly because of some persecution! The only people who are out to kill these “asylum” seekers are other Muslims! Why don’t they stay in their own countries and make them better places if Islam is such a better religion than what exists in the west?! Why? Because the the far left activist globalists of the west and their employees at the UN are offering them extremely generous benefit packages if they will live in the west and help them rid the area of those freedom loving Europeans and Americans! No Christians, Yazidis, or other non Muslims, OE EVEN minority sect Muslims were allowed into the refugee program run by the UN for the EU and US during the Bush and Obama regimes! Oh, yes! Less than 1% which = 0!
James Lincoln says
First and foremost, Euan Fraser should have known that it is impossible for an unbeliever to have a harmless discussion about religion with a Muslim.
Muslims, in general, have an extremely low threshold for getting triggered when an unbeliever discusses anything that may be perceived as being derogatory towards Islam.
It sounds like the victim suffered a cerebral hemorrhage due to the blunt force trauma of a metal pipe. Very serious injury, I hope and pray that he makes a full recovery.
That Muslim taxi driver must be found and prosecuted fully – and eventually be deported.
gravenimage says
Australia: Muslim cabbie beats atheist with crowbar, leaves him for dead after “harmless discussion about religion”
………………..
This *poor man*. I’m sure this Muslim thug considered an admission of atheism to be “blasphemy”.
And the victim was 6’5″ and a former cagefighter–a formidable guy. What chance would the rest of us have against a Muslim like this savage attacker?
Mark Swan says
The attack was from behind—no one could defend themselves
after a hard blow to the head with a large piece of steel—
of course this coward feared the big man, with all that muscle—
these murdering Muslims are cocky, cruel, and sneaky but
not tough or strong—that would require hard work,
to develop such bodies—since most are apposed to
any work, it is probable they are mostly soft.
gravenimage says
True, Mark.
Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says
//And the victim was 6’5″ and a former cagefighter–a formidable guy. What chance would the rest of us have against a Muslim like this savage attacker?//
Recall the hijacking of Indian Airlines passengers to taleban ruled khandahar afghanistan by jihadists ?
The hijacking was to secure instant release of jihadi murderers ( hailing from pakistan ), held in prison by lackadaisical india that is notorious for its refrain ” let the law take its own course”.Two muslims who were british citizens were also among the hijackers. Who travelled back to uk which media called ”safe passage was provided for them”.
bjp glutton hajpayee ( vajpayee ) was the pm then. Who frittered away his time coming up with some urdu couplets utterly worthless that is hailed by most idiots of india with cries of vah vah vah…with one eye closed & constantly gorging on food. All the halo manufactured around good for nothing vajpayee got busted ( very recently) by politically incorrect Subramanian Swamy.
I came to know vajpayee joined the communists first. Was an alcoholic. Not a celibate either as believed by many. Without entering into matrimony sired some ”love child” through another married woman.
All were screaming hindu hindu hindutvAAA hindutvAA …he did this & that. Then joined RSS.
Nowhere does Sri.Adi Ssankara ( Hindus’ Guru) advocate gluttony.
Whereas I read vajpayee needed non stop supply of sweets , salted nuts , fried prawns , puris etc etc I was appalled. How come not a single Indian cared to mention all these shocking facts except one Subramanian Swamy ? Even while dying I read he did not give up non stop chomping of nuts sweets etc. Most ill qualified for prime Ministership. RSS boasts of utmost discipline among their cadres. Would you call this debauchery discipline ?
That is india. And they audaciously scream ” the world cannot ignore us today…with such gdp growth , indian economy in dizzying heights America , Japan , Israel , Russia , Africa , uk all need us more than we need them…we will sell our Brahmos missiles to Vietnam , Botswana Bolivia Ecuador ……our indigenous missiles called nirbhay are superior to Tomahawk hahaha …”.
” our soft power of bollywood movies is watched by all in Middle East….Egypt has been conquered by amitabh bachan , russia long conquered by rajkapoor , Japan conquered by Rajnikanth…entire South Africa conquered by bollywood film fraternity…..universsity in uk conquered by shah rukh khan’s lungi dance …bill gates is also thirsting to invite amir khan to stage live bump & grind gyrations…india is going places …”
That particular deadly paki terrorist belonging to lashkar-e-toiba ( some name mazood azhar mullah something ) was like one obese mountain of formidable girth. He was escorted by external affairs minister to afghanistan’s talebanis. He went to pakistan & resumed what they routinely do -KILL.
During that time Four Sleuths of India who had captured him hiding in a hotel within Bombay said:-
” We were caught unawares…did not expect he would be able to resist all of us…we had a trying time wrestling & pinning him to the ground”.
All in vain.
Co-existence is never to be sought with such dangerous entities. But secularism in indian context means coerced co existence with these formidable foes.
gravenimage says
I don’t really care that much if a politician has a sweet tooth–I’m more concerned about the dangers of pandering to Islam.
Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says
I do NOT care about your opinions.
This being called ”jihadwatch” I am somewhat coerced into badmouthing Muslims , ISLAM & utter not a single word about your devilish cult christianity.
Often I have been yelled at ” go to christianwatch….this is jihadwatch”.
The entire world knows the most formidable DEVILS are evangelizing christians.
Ramana Bhagavan , Kanchi Ssankaracharya are MY Guru.
Certainly not your dangerous benny hinns & various biible thumpers.
Muslims are as much children of The SAME God as I am.
Why do you presume you conceited idiots are ”seekers” of God ?
Based exclusively on MY personal life & my encounters it is overwhelmingly MUSLIMS who command my respect. I have no malice towards them at all.
I perceive no special piety in hindus . Who worship film actors & call ” cricket is our religion”.
Yes. Akbar , Aurangazeb etc etc came & attacked India etc etc. When Svami Vivekananda rushed forward on hearing about Kheer Bhavani Temple being attacked ,
Ma Kaali gave Her Visvarupa Darshan showing Vivekananda it was SHE who was doing everything. He understood & stayed quiet.
NOWHERE has Kanchi Ssankaracharya asked Muslims to give up their Holy Koran , their ways of worshipping & convert to indooyisum christianity atheism agnosticism hedonism blah blah.
GOD Almighty is The Authority. There is nothing wrong with Muslims .
Whereas all chicanery of various vested interests which very much includes your vatican pope ( all pervasive paedophilia , mass murders etc etc ) & predatory mission of ”planting the cross” to grab LAND with its resources is THE cause of all sorts of violence & wars worldwide.
You are ssso asinine. What a pity , your presume you know everything just because all scream your country is soooperpower developpedddd blah blah.
It was comical to see you Americans getting agitated over one Kavanaugh & his alleged ”abuse” whatever. All of you are blithely unconcerned about mass rapes mass paedophilia of your own christian papacy.
Is this truly developpped country ??
Please do not insult me by pounding more & more CRAP.
When some SANE Italians of some Company defined what a Family is ..it is elton johns that intolerantly screamed asking his fans to boycott that well known Company’s products extorting apologies & apologies.
I NEVER said I am in awe of your vatican poop.
My questions are rhetorical. Understand ? Do not attempt to answer.
gravenimage says
What prompted this outburst of insanity from Janakiraman Rajalakshmi? He wrote:
I do NOT care about your opinions.
This being called ”jihadwatch” I am somewhat coerced into badmouthing Muslims , ISLAM & utter not a single word about your devilish cult christianity.
………………………………….
What rot. Jihad Watch does not coerce anyone. In fact, there are pro-Jihadists who post here regularly. If Janakiraman Rajalakshmi wants to laud Muslims, Islam, and Jihad here, he can do so.
It seems he is more outraged over someone’s midnight snacking than anything else–odd priorities.
And what is “devilish” about Christianity?
This was a Muslim who beat this man within an inch of his life for saying he is an Atheist–the assailant was not Christian.
More:
Often I have been yelled at ” go to christianwatch….this is jihadwatch”.
The entire world knows the most formidable DEVILS are evangelizing christians.
………………………………….
What is Janakiraman Rajalakshmi babbling about here? How so?
More:
Ramana Bhagavan , Kanchi Ssankaracharya are MY Guru (sic).
………………………………….
That’s fine with me. Pious Muslims will murder you for being a devout Hindu, though.
More:
Certainly not your dangerous benny hinns & various biible thumpers.
………………………………….
I’m not a particular fan of Benny Hinn’s style–but how is he “dangerous”? He is a peaceful man. He has never attacked Atheists–or Hindus.
More:
Muslims are as much children of The SAME God as I am.
………………………………….
True enough. That doesn’t mean they don’t want to kill you, though.
More:
Why do you presume you conceited idiots are ”seekers” of God ?
Based exclusively on MY personal life & my encounters it is overwhelmingly MUSLIMS who command my respect. I have no malice towards them at all.
………………………………….
Well, that’s lovely. So Janakiraman Rajalakshmi is fine with Muslims wanting to slaughter Infidels and impose brutal Shari’ah law?
More:
I perceive no special piety in hindus . Who worship film actors & call ” cricket is our religion”.
………………………………….
Well, Janakiraman Rajalakshmi did say that he wanted all Bollywood actors nuked to death yesterday–before his unhinged post was removed.
More:
Yes. Akbar , Aurangazeb etc etc came & attacked India etc etc. When Svami Vivekananda rushed forward on hearing about Kheer Bhavani Temple being attacked ,
Ma Kaali gave Her Visvarupa Darshan showing Vivekananda it was SHE who was doing everything. He understood & stayed quiet.
NOWHERE has Kanchi Ssankaracharya asked Muslims to give up their Holy Koran , their ways of worshipping & convert to indooyisum christianity atheism agnosticism hedonism blah blah.
………………………………….
How nice. So Janakiraman Rajalakshmi–and he–are fine with the savagery of the Qur’an, and believe that Muslims are right to continue to act on its murderous and oppressive diktats?
In fact, the Shankaracharya of Kanchi Kamakoti Peetam has said of Muslims, “has Allah told them to fight all the time”? He may not actually be as pro-Jihad as Janakiraman Rajalakshmi appears to believe.
More:
GOD Almighty is The Authority. There is nothing wrong with Muslims .
Whereas all chicanery of various vested interests which very much includes your vatican pope ( all pervasive paedophilia , mass murders etc etc ) & predatory mission of ”planting the cross” to grab LAND with its resources is THE cause of all sorts of violence & wars worldwide.
………………………………….
There’s nothing wrong with Muslims? Were you fine with the horrifying attacks on Mumbai? I’m not. And while this pontiff is a sad appeaser of Islam, he has killed no one–and has started no wars. What calumny.
More:
You are ssso (sic) asinine. What a pity , your presume you know everything just because all scream your country is soooperpower (sic) developpedddd (sic) blah blah.
………………………………….
Where have I screamed that America is a “soooperpower”? What a lot of tripe. And I am actually concerned about Jihad *everywhere*–not just in the West. I hate Jihad in India, as well–unlike Janakiraman Rajalakshmi, apparently.
More:
It was comical to see you Americans getting agitated over one Kavanaugh & his alleged ”abuse” whatever. All of you are blithely unconcerned about mass rapes mass paedophilia of your own christian papacy.
………………………………….
Absolutely untrue–I have condemned this many times. And pedophilia is not a part of Christianity, of course–would that one could say the same for Islam. Child marriage is rife in Islam–including in India. Is Janakiraman Rajalakshmi fine with this?
More:
Is this truly developpped (sic) country ??
………………………………….
The United States is hardly perfect–but is pretty developed, yes–certainly far more so than any Muslim nation.
More:
Please do not insult me by pounding more & more CRAP.
When some SANE Italians of some Company defined what a Family is ..it is elton johns that intolerantly screamed asking his fans to boycott that well known Company’s products extorting apologies & apologies.
………………………………….
Elton John is British, not American. Then, Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana are themselves a gay couple. Not sure what Janakiraman Rajalakshmi’s point is here?
More:
I NEVER said I am in awe of your vatican poop.
………………………………….
I am, actually, a regular critic of the current pontiff–especially of his dhimmitude and appeasement of Islam. The idea that I am in awe of him and have demanded this of others is absurd.
Oh, and I’m not Catholic myself in any case–although I have respected previous popes.
More:
My questions are rhetorical. Understand ? Do not attempt to answer.
………………………………….
I see that Janakiraman Rajalakshmi is now demanding that I not reply to his copious load of bs here. Sorry–I actually exercise my freedom of speech.
Carol the 1st says
Caged until ‘broken’: life for Mumbai’s prostitutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybgnSEx_-SA
Trev says
Hmmm
A drunk Scot, MMA fighter…….hops in a cab to talk about religion. I just have an image of MMA fighter McGregor hopping in. Scots and the Irish love taking the piss out everyone on the piss. Never known a quiet Scot travelling Oz. Sorry but most people in Oz can’t handle banter. Most just just give the nervous laugh or look of shock of what comes out of your mouth. Sorry but mouthed off to the wrong guy……
CogitoErgoSum says
So you’re okay with hitting somebody in the back of the head with a crowbar if they say something you don’t like?
Trev says
Not what I said
CogitoErgoSum says
You said he mouthed off to the wrong guy — as if that justifies what happened to him. Sure seems like you are saying if you mouth off to the wrong guy, you deserve what you get. If that’s not what you are saying, you should be more precise in what you say. I’d say hitting somebody from behind for what he said to you is cowardly but, as you say, you didn’t say that.
Trev says
Ha
It’s not what I said. I don’t have to be precise. You just have to be a whole lot less left and not go on a rant over how you interpret things.
gravenimage says
So will Trev condemn this unprovoked attack? I’m not holding my breath…
gravenimage says
The idea that most Australians would have beaten this man into a coma is just grotesque calumny. This happened because the attacker was a Muslim.
Mark Swan says
Absolutely gravenimage, a murdering Muslim fit, that is what this was about.
gravenimage says
+1
WPM says
I have had many people I have disagree with that were loud and obnoxious sober and drunk. In my 60 years on this planet earth I have never ever considered hitting them in the back of the head with a metal bar. I either confronted them up front or walk away to see another day not to have a fight with someone over nothing that matter in the long term of things. If someone is loud and drunk and not physical threating you that does not give you the OK to kill them. Cowards kill men walking away from confrontation ,Islam is a religion of cowards.
Mark Swan says
Yes indeed WPM.
gravenimage says
Spot on, WPM.
Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says
@WPM ,
Absolutely concur with you.
Years earlier another American Soldier commenting here also wrote about their devious ways of attack. Like hiding behind their womenfolk , their womenfolk handing over some toy or dead goat filled with deadly explosives ..their children also no less devious & deadly. I am numb with SHOCK majority expect Donald Trump to welcome caravan filled with unknown enemies.
Watch ”Lone Survivor” based on true events. It is very very heart rending. One act of misplaced compassion towards seemingly harmless goat herders proves horrendously fatal for American Seals. They turn out to be taleban spies.
The main culprit is cnn ( media). They disregard their instincts . They are scared of what cnn would say…that we are killing harmless civilians.
Donald Trump should become utterly merciless.
dumbledoresarmy says
“Like hiding behind their womenfolk , their womenfolk handing over some toy or dead goat filled with deadly explosives ..their children also no less devious & deadly.”
Yes. It isn’t just a group of Muslim *men* that should be viewed with great wariness.
A group of Muslim *females* – two or more – especially when fully decked out in their Gang Colours i.e. the Slave Rag/ Sharia Badge – whether the mere headscarf or the full face-mask/black cloak terrify-the-infidel-children outfit – should *also* be viewed with suspicion.
An English MP was greeted, once, by a smiling muslimah in a pretty headscarf. With her left hand (dung hand) she proposed to shake hands with him; and she was still smiling, holding his hand, as with her *other* hand she took a knife out of her handbag and shoved it into his gut. Just. like. that. In his office, when he was having a ‘meet the constituency’ day.
He was very lucky – he survived.
But one hopes he learned a permanent lesson about those pretty smiling muslimahs in their Gang Uniform, even when it deceptively pretends to be just the same as a Christian nun’s wimple… because it ain’t, it’s Gang Colours.
Peggy says
Who said he was mouthing off? He only expressed that he was a atheist. was that wrong? Are we supposed to be afraid to say what we believe in when a subject comes up?
Even if he had insulted that pedo Mohammed the drive HAD NOT RIGHT to attack him.
Nothing excuses an attempted murder.
gravenimage says
Exactly, Peggy.
And even if had was opinionated, that is no reason to try to beat him to death. Obvious this is *not* something actual Australians would do, despite what Trev–whom I have never seen posting here before–pretends.
gravenimage says
And even if he was opinionated
Salome says
You are right, nothing excuses what happened. But he did trot out the same old boring platitudes about ‘religion’ being responsible for all the bad things and science being responsible for all the good things. Most of us, however, obey the law which says you are not allowed to eat a man up for saying such tosh.
TWG says
Never, ever, turn your back to a moslem. Or their BFF, the islammunist (previously known as a “democrat”)
Truth says
Australians need to start carrying guns.
Salome says
No use if the blow is coming from behind. And he wasn’t Australian. Do we want to arm tourists as well?
Wellington says
Goes back to the reputed founder of Islam, whose character is that of a brutal psychopath, narcissist, control-freak, complete fraud and pedophile. Proceed from here and you will be on your way to “figuring out” Islam. Don’t proceed from the totality of the malevolence of the character which was Mo’s and you will be behind the eight-ball from the get-go in properly deciphering the rotten excuse for a religion which is Islam.
Yes, Mohammed is the key. Destroy him and you destroy Islam. Honor him and you are destined to be forever clueless about the true nature of Islam.
simpleton1 says
Very good and succinct.
“Mohammed is the key. Destroy him and you destroy Islam. Honor him and you are destined to be forever clueless about the true nature of Islam”.
Guard and defend our free speech. Use it so that it does not wither. The fruit of truth is how Western Civilization has advanced.
“Only those who do not wish to see can be deceived.”
― Dianna Hardy, Saving Eve
Roger woodhouse says
‘Free speech ‘is now at risk of being labled ‘hate speech’here in the West.
Peggy says
Police investigated but have yet to trace the taxi driver….
=========================
All fares are logged prior to the trip starting so how can they not locate the driver?
Maybe they don’t want to.
They keep encouraging us to use taxis instead of Uber and this is what happens. Most taxi drivers are middle eastern so why would anyone trust them is beyond me.
dumbledoresarmy says
Problem is, the Muslims are signing up for Uber as well.
If I recall correctly, there have been Muslim Uber drivers who have raped female passengers.
Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says
Totally believe in what you have narrated above. About one muslima that stealthily stabbed.
Several decades ago also the same deceitful ungrateful stabbing of an Englishman took place in India soon after partition by a muslim.
The exact details were given by one K.Phanda in Chandan Mitra’s newspaper Pioneer.
Such stark truths proved unpalatable to rest of the idiots of India. They started objecting by writing ” we are having a peaceful co existence with muslims ..why write about what happened in the past…Phanda is unnecessarily creating trouble…”. It is indoos who are the culprits. Most of them are communists. Their mindset has always been that. Forever insisting on feeding us wrong distorted history. Those Hindus speaking the truth get branded ”communal”.
They are so comfortable wallowing in bollywood crap & playing cricket with pakistan bangladesh do NOT want these to be disrupted any way.
That Englishman was a normal harmless person doing some allotted duties of paperwork.
The muslim looking meek , poor innocent blah blah came with some paper asking for that Englishman’s signature. When he was signing suddenly that muslim took out a hidden knife & stabbed him to death.
That was the ONLY time British meted out the most befitting punishment to that muslim killer.
It is the belief of muslims that should they die in fire or their body is cremated instead of being buried they go to Hell instead of paradise. That culprit was hanged & his dead body was set on Fire.
For years Hugh Fitzgerald kept on warning winning of their hearts minds by offering toys , toffees , state of the art greenhouses etc etc…nothing would work . YET I do not fathom why we continued to give them benefit of doubt.
They do consider themselves superior to the rest of non muslims of the world.
Elisha says
After reading the quran (which was difficult and disturbing), I can see why muslims are so violent as it commands them to attack/kill unbelievers. Ultimately what we have here are two ignorant men, utterly lost and blinded by the devil to God’s truth. That secular humanism has enabled the rise of islam in the West is lost on atheists. One must acknowledge that ideas have consequences, or:
“Indeed, they sow the wind and reap the whirlwind. There is no standing grain; what sprouts fails to yield flour. Even if it should produce, the foreigners would swallow it up.” – Hosea 8:7
“Euan, who was working on a farm at the time, argued that religion had “played a part in causing deaths and wars” throughout history.”
This is solid proof of a person not seeking truth in their heart (Psalm 145:18, Jeremiah 29:13, James 4:6, 1 Corinthians 2:10-14). Hundreds of millions of human beings have been killed in less than the last 100 years due to secular humanism subjective “morality”. Such a lack of introspection confirms what Paul said in 2 Corinthians 4:4 and 2 Thessalonians 7-12.
“Architecture student Euan said: “He didn’t like it at all when I started expressing my views. He started to preach his religion on me.”
The curriculum for schools in the West is set by the Communist UNESCO, which preaches the religion of secular humanism and indoctrinates children with philosophy rather than facts, to the exclusion of God’s truth in the Bible, which is the bedrock of Western civilization and a functioning society.
“I argued that science was responsible for evolution rather than religion, which he didn’t like either.”
Darwinism is NOT scientific! It is a philosophical delusion that is rooted in Hinduism. The only book besides that Darwin took on the SS Beagle was Charles Lyell’s book on uniformitarian geology, which has since been utterly discredited, notably by the incident at Mt St Helens in 1980:
https://creation.com/lessons-from-mount-st-helens
Darwin was greatly influenced by “slow and gradual processes” in an attempt to explain existence. Nothing he wrote in his book on “evolution” involved the scientific process. On the contrary, his hypothesis is refuted by scientific evidence. There are two types of science – practical and historical. Historical science is based on unprovable assumptions and secular humanists either wittingly or unwittingly conflate the two in an attempt to give their beliefs credibility.
Concerning the word “religion”, atheism, by definition, is indeed a religious view. The word “religion” comes from the Latin “religare” – [re:back, ligare:to bind] – expressing the idea that one is bound to one’s beliefs, which guide all of one’s actions. Religion can therefore include the belief that there is no supernatural realm, which, in itself, is atheistic folly, obliterated by the fact that things like morality and reason (which are not matter) exist OUTSIDE of the natural realm (ie, matter). Like many other words, atheists distort their original meanings to suit their agenda.
There is NO excuse for ignorance in the 21st century. If Simon Greenleaf (as an atheist) 300 years ago could examine the evidence for the Bible and become a Christian, then so can you. If Sir William Ramsay, the renowned Archaeologist, (as an atheist) could examine the evidence for the Bible and become a Christian, so can you. If James Warner Wallace, former homicide detective, (as an atheist) could examine the Bible and become a Christian, so can you. Same goes for journalist and former atheist Lee Strobel and many many other people. The common thread for ALL of these people was a sincere, heartfelt desire to seek truth. This is how God reveals Himself to you!
https://creation.com/the-creation-answers-book-index
http://www.jasonlisle.com/2012/05/17/on-the-origin-of-articles/#more-97
J. Warner Wallace – Cold Case for the Reliability of the New Testament
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMJMbm-43c8&t=1125s
https://bibleevidences.com/
My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. – Hosea 4:6
Elisha says
“The only book besides that Darwin took …”
That should read “The only book besides THE BIBLE that Darwin took …”
kouldb says
OK. Well aside from people like yourself. We all understand atheism to mean that a person doesn’t believe in a God/creator. And we don’t consider atheism a religion in & of itself because we associate religious beliefs with the belief on a deity: Atheists do not believe in the existence of a God. So you can split hairs over the meaning of words as much as you like. It won’t change the fact that the only religion on earth which preaches, condones & sanctifies violence against everyone else: Is Islam. So whilst you evangelise about the Bible vs Darwin’s theory, evolution & science. You’re missing the point. Which is the right for people to hold their own beliefs. Without being physically assaulted and/or persecuted for them. So long as they harm no one & don’t infringe on the rights of others to hold their own. And so long as it doesn’t advocate for or condone violence. It’s no one else’s business if someone doesn’t believe in a creator.
gravenimage says
Yes.
Ernie says
Elisha , I get the impression you’re saying : this Euan Fraser brought all this misfortune upon himself for not believing……………….what YOU believe ! I get the impression you are a person without love ( and wisdom ) and a real RELI-FASCIST , just as all those “good muslims “. You make me vomit !
gravenimage says
Just appalling–he did not deserve to be attacked.
Lydia Church says
“Harmless,” huh?!
Not if it involves a koran following muslim!
David M says
I’m in Australia & I haven’t seen this mentioned in the news once, they must be trying to hide it.
Peggy says
Same here. I switch from Sunrise to Today in the mornings and listen to the news there but there was no mention of this on either show.
Do they think they can really hide this? Social media is a b!tch for the globalists.
kouldb says
I think the Daily Mail had an article on it? Or was it news.com.au? I can’t remember which now. But it certainly wasn’t reported by the ABC, Fairfax or on TV. Which is no surprise since the religion of peace gets a free pass. No matter how much violence it incites, condones & commits.
Carol the 1st says
The linked article states it happened on June 12/17. Fraser himself is only talking about it now – he feels traumatized for life and has nightmares.
The press was rather short on details at the time:
“It is believed a man was standing outside his home address on Fawkner Street in the early hours of the morning when he was struck in the back of the head by an unknown offender.
The victim reported having a verbal altercation with a taxi driver prior to the incident.
Investigators have not identified the offender at this stage and the investigation remains ongoing.
Anyone with information is urged to contact Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or submit a confidential report at http://www.crimestoppersvic.com.au.”
Carol the 1st says
At the risk of looking “phobic”, it seems the public must take it upon *themselves* to inform and warn each other that chatting about religious beliefs with certain muslims (especially while in their taxis) can be extremely dangerous to your health.
Peggy says
I read this on Daily Mail and even left several replies and a post but not one got published.
If you read the comments on there you’ll see that no comment mentions Muslims and because I did mine never got through.
gravenimage says
Despicable, but not surprising, Peggy.
infidel says
Attacking stronger people from behind and BLINDSIDING them totally unawares… ANOTHER ISLAMIC TRUISM from the annals of the infidel. U can never trust a single one of them. India is filled with instances where brave Hindu toughs have been cornered by 10 or 20 Muslims and stabbing them from behind while he fights with those on his front. That is why Hindu warrior Baji Prabhu in Maratha history fought these animals by blocking a very narrow pass.. knowing very well for the perfidious tendency of these animals to attack from the back totally unawares and then celebrating this as a brave victory for Islam.
kouldb says
THIS is why you always get the registration number and/or the cab driver’s operator number when getting into a cab. However, Vic Pol are now officially useless. But as a woman. I refuse to get into cabs or Uber cars with Muslim drivers. I just flat refuse. And I don’t think much of Indians either I might add. They too have little respect for women. Especially white women. I was never like this years ago. But familiarity breeds contempt, the paradox of tolerance is real & all that.
alex smythe says
He would have had to have jotted it down though, and hoped that a perp wouldn’t have stolen the piece of paper later (if it were it his wallet). If he had taken it and simply tried to recall it, with the serious assault and head injury he probably would have forgotten it.
I haven’t had any problems with Sikh cabbies, but I guess there are always some bad apples in a barrel (some barrels have way more bad apples of course). I have learned to avoid talking to Muslims about religion though, as they are often very touchy and easily triggered, yet generally have little or no problem criticizing other people’s religious beliefs. Nice double-standard there.
I remember reading a similar thing about a Canadian guy anmed Scott Giddy who was in Meixco at a tourist resort with his wife a few years back; after using the hotel washroom, he stepped out of the hotel alone to look around. When he next woke up, he was in a hsopital recovering from brain surgery. Apparently, someone had sucker-struck him in the back of the head with a heavy steel pipe or something, in order to rob him. His wife found him and had a taxi take him to a clinic and then the hospital. Luckily, he survived; they now think that there was a scheme amongst gang members, taxi drivers and the clinic (which had overcharged them for a “diagnosis”, what the hell) in order to rob and scam tourists.
However, that’s what organized thugs do, iin order to get money. I doubt that the average thug in Mexico would do that just for having a disagreement regarding Catholcism, atheism or the Virgin Mary. (Not that it makes them much less worse than the homicidal Muslim cabbie in the incident in Australia)
Carol the 1st says
Sikhs have a different value system and a comprehension of what true peace is. They know the horrid history of Islam but generally seem to believe in befriending all. We see a lot of them in Canada and often side by side with apparent muslims. You wonder why this is happening.
Twerzig says
He’ll never drive cabs again.
He looking at 5 to 10 years in jail.
But the drunk Scotsman didn’t realise
what a dangerous thing he was doing.
He’s on crazy mans territory
and winding him up.
alex smythe says
If that’s the sentence he would be getting in Australia if he were arrested, charged and convicted, it’s way too light. In most parts of the U.S., he’d get a much heavier sentence for that kind of crime.
gravenimage says
Just about anything ‘winds Muslims up’.
Older Canadian says
Never discuss religion or politics with a stranger.
What happened to this poor man who likely thought he was having a intellectual discussion was absolutely deplorable.
His assailant…..no excuses……his actions was absolutely vile, and yes deserving of Karma justice.
gravenimage says
I’ve had political and religious discussions with strangers before–including many cabbies. This used to be pretty safe before Muslims starting flooding into our countries…
tim gallagher says
Several people have made comments about not turning your back on Muslims in relation to this report. I was doing some work with old, infirm people in the western suburbs of Sydney about 8 or 9 years ago. One of the old people was a fantastic Maltese man. He was about 80 years old and I would take him and his wife, who had dementia, out shopping. He was a wonderful, gentle type of person, a religious Christian and, I would say, a saintly person. He and his wife came to Australia just after World War II. I remember saying to him something like, “Oh, these Muslims worry me. I think they are trouble”. I wasn’t sure what he would say, because he was such a good, deeply Christian person. He simply replied, “Yes, don’t turn your back on them”. I was a little surprised and thought that what he said must have been some folk wisdom from Malta. I figured that the Maltese, probably often attacked by Muslims, given Malta’s position in the Mediterranean, knew never to trust Muslims. It came to mind when I read this report.
Shalom says
This poor, poor man. Muslims can never be light hearted and reasonable. They’re so angry.
Alex H says
Atheists should just stick to brow-beating Christians – at least we’ll put up with their nonsense.
gravenimage says
I see no indication that the victim was “browbeating” his assailant.
Peggy says
It was the other way around.
gravenimage says
All too true, Peggy.
Mike Rembrandt says
The victim, in his own words, said that he heard footsteps from behind and then was hit on the head. He didn’t say he saw his attacker. I don’t think the taxi driver can be charged unless he admits the attack. That isn’t very likely.