3,000 people were murdered by Islamic jihadis on September 11, 2001. Russian election interference not only killed no one, but the little interference that has actually been established was insignificant and had no effect on the outcome. This is the moral myopia and addiction to fantasy of the Left today.
“Hillary Clinton Compares Russian Election Interference To The 9/11 Attacks,” by Emily Zanotti, Daily Wire, October 3, 2018:
During an interview at the Atlantic Festival, failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton compared suspected Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election — an “attack” by a foreign power — to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
Clinton addressed a variety of topics in her on-stage interview with Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg, recycling a handful of excuses for her loss and accusing President Trump of embracing “white nationalism.” She also seemed to accuse the Trump campaign of taking part in an international “Vast Right Wing Conspiracy” to alter election results — a conspiracy that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s own year-long investigation has found no proof of….
“What we know now is incredibly troubling … we have been attacked by a foreign power and have done nothing,” she said.
“It would be like — I can’t even imagine — I mean, it’s a horrible example, but after 9/11, [if] George W. Bush said, ‘Well, I don’t have time to meet. I don’t have time to worry about this. It was terrible. We feel sorry about it. We’ll rebuild New York and the Pentagon, but we’re not going to worry about it.’ Well at a certain point, that’s what this is turning into. The evidence continues to accumulate,” Clinton added….
Renate says
She needs to retire to an old folks’ home.
mortimer says
NUMBER ONE FAKE NEW SOURCE: Hill-LIAR-Y Clinton.
revereridesagain says
Full of Republicans!
J D S says
Yes Hillary “Killary” ( death of the ambassador and others ) the evidence does continue to mount
Mary says
After 2 years she still can’t believe that SHE LOST. GET OVER IT. YOU LOST.
Giacomo Latta says
But please don’t think she was running just for herself. She was doing it for the benefit of womenkind! Or so she always said publicly. Did her e-mails back that up? Well, if we can ever find one then perhaps we’ll know. Where are they, Hillary?
Deno says
She sold defense uranium to Russia and arms to ISIS from Benghazi (Thats another story thats true )She is such a HYPOCRITE
Rufluc says
Is she STILL spewing out that liberal leftist Democrap bile? What is it with her and her species? Everything she and the Dems say and do is totally exaggerated and extreme to the point it’s only others like her that believe it.
I’m convinced that being a Democrap is like suffering from rabies. They’ve all taken leave of their senses IF they had any in the first place.
It’s good news about the FBI report on Kavanaugh. Seems he’s going to be cleared of the allegations. Wish I could see Clintons face when she hears that!!
Westman says
I hope that is all that happens in the process of seating Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court. We have seen a year of violence on campus’ that was reminiscent of the 1960’s. It is now ratcheting up, fueled by educational institutions, and sore losers like Hilary, who are downright traitorous; willing to break the law to circumvent democratic outcomes they don’t like. This excess violence ended on campus, in the 60’s, with the Kent State shootings; a very sad day. Professors can kill(indirectly).
We now see the same rabid intent in liberals that may lose its ability to resist violence in the face of Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation. To what limits will they confine themselves? Would they block the runway for Sen Daines arrival? Ram his car? Does their current anarchism have a limit? Are the Senators safe in their homes and travel? Watching the mob corner a Senator in an elevator and the recent public harassment of officials should be of concern that the liberal mob has lost its self-restraint and we may be approaching a
“Kent State like” event.
SB says
The evidence continues to accumulate (against Trump’s presidency) Hillary added. What a senile old hag grasping for anything to exonerate her.and Bill’s reputations.
I have a great idea for a reality TV show. Hillary and Bill in the clink with very stylish orange jumpsuits, in the same cell. (where they rightfully belong) Throw in some silly-string, a beach ball, and mace. That would be fun to watch.
mortimer says
And the collusion of the Dems with George Soros was supposedly NOT a “vast conspiracy” ???
Does anyone want Corrupt Hillary or Bill the Rapist back in the White House? Anyone at all … besides her?
Narcissism is a very strong drug and true narcissists seldom stop USING IT.
CogitoErgoSum says
Now here we have an example of a woman who is BOTH stupid and a liar.
Walter Sieruk says
Wow that old women ,Hillary Clinton , is so shallow that she can’t or won’t accept responsibility for for own failure in the campaign for President .Therefore she keeps on looking for excuses.
The reality is that Hillary Clinton was totally and completely unfit ,for many reasons to hold the Office in the White House.
Kepha says
This lady called Shrillary Shrooooo
Was looking for something to do.
She blames me for her loss,
Plus you and yours, boss,
And next, animals in the zoo!
mortimer says
Hill-liar-y put herself firmly in the camp of anti-nationalism and globalism.
Is that not a CONSPIRACY???
David Grisez says
I am amazed that this whole Russian collusion investigation which has found little to no evidence has gone on so ridiculously long. It is basically the Democrat Party Effort to try to discredit and remove President Trump from office. It sounds like Hilary Clinton is out of touch with reality. Since the government will not prosecute her for her crimes, she should just go into retirement from public life and political activities.
Voytek Gagalka says
The only evidence which continues to accumulate is evidence of Clinton crime family forever to complain about anything but their complicity in crimes against the nation (remember Benghazi fiasco?) And “we know now THAT is incredibly troubling.” How about interference of Mohammedan mafia (Muslim Brotherhood and the OIC which Clintons are supporting) in American politics?
revereridesagain says
HELLary believes (? hah — she sez!) it was one reason she lost. Consider the equivalency here. Nearly 3,000 dead innocent people = HELLary Rotten Clinton being disappointed in her ambition.
James Lincoln says
Hillary Clinton needs to see a neurologist to rule out early-onset Alzheimer’s.
I’m not kidding. Chelsea should take her in for a full evaluation.
Wellington says
She is morally retrograde and I agree with Ann Coulter that the key to understanding so much of what she has done (e.g., using her own private server while Secretary of State) is to realize that she is possessed of a mediocre intellect, sometimes leaning to sheer stupidity. Her husband is also a moral retrograde but he is super smart and high intelligence combined with low moral intelligence is quite often a dangerous combination, Hillary’s hubby being a first-rate example of this very undesirable mix.
Christine says
Whatever happened to “Hillary for Prison 2016?”
It is not humanly possible for the accused hijackers to have crashed planes into the buildings in question because;
1) you have to be an instrument rated pilot to fly a commercial airliner
2) none of the accused were instrument rated pilots
3) several commercial pilots have admitted publicly that they would have great difficulty in ramming a building with an airliner
4) a former FAA inspector told me that such a feat is “impossible” without a pre-planted homing beacon
5) ever seen a real commercial airliner crash into a hard object? The fuel laden wings and body usually ignite instantly and the whole thing crumples. Unless, of course, it was the WTC. The plane disappeared into it and THEN ignited. Which is not physically possible. Want to see the results of a REAL airplane crashing into a building? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YLWh8Rbp7o
CogitoErgoSum says
Different building, different plane traveling at a different rate of speed with a different amount of fuel just may mean a different result ….. and you are saying the people who saw the two planes crash into the WTC actually saw an illusion and the video of it is fake? You are going to have to do better than that with your theory. Plus ….are you saying Hillary had something to do with what happened on 9/11?
jack says
so where was the wreckage of the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon?
P.Copson says
“….several commercial pilots have admitted publicly that they would have great difficulty in ramming a building with an airliner….
Don’t be ridiculous – a skyscraper is far wider than a runway and vastly taller (of course) – any fool can see a building that height and width and steer towards it.
gravenimage says
True.
phantomfighter says
Yeah that’s right- they would have “great difficulty” because they would never in their concience even think about doing just that. Pilots do not train for that. Only the terrrorists do.
eduardo odraude says
An appalling number of people show themselves avid for conspiracy theories about 9/11. If you show them the facts that blow up their ridiculous conspiracy, they just change the subject and start talking about another of the threads of the conspiracy. A conspiracy theory is pathological when it shows itself immune to the facts.
To see the insanity of the 9/11 conspiracy theories (which frequently contradict each other), read Popular Mechanics’ book examining dozens of the 9/11 conspiracy claims and countering them with tons of facts and experts.
https://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Myths-Conspiracy-Theories/dp/1588165477
gravenimage says
So true, Eduardo.
Wellington says
Stella comes to mind here, gravenimage. And let’s not forget that JFK was shot from the front. Sorry for the sarcasm but conspiracy folks tend to ruin legitimate arguments and do a disservice to reason in general. And for the record, I am not a member of the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission or associated with Agenda 21. Of course, in conspiracy world, it is possible, if not likely, that I am lying here.
gravenimage says
Wellington, 🙂
StellaSaidSo says
@ Wellington
Quite right, Biffo, JFK was shot from the front. You’re catching on.
Wellington says
Stella: Nope. Name sources who aver so.
gravenimage says
Calling someone “Biffo” is not, of course, a reasoned argument.
StellaSaidSo says
@ gravenimage
Says the poster who routinely calls other posters ‘vile’ and ‘appalling’, among other smears and slanders. What a hypocrite you are, GI.
StellaSaidSo says
@ Wellington
Biffo, there are dozens of sources who ‘aver so’. The fatal shot came from the front, as the Zapruder footage, and eyewitness testimony, demonstrate. Bullets don’t do U-turns.
Wellington says
Stella: If there are dozens of sources why not name four or five? Yeah, go ahead. I challenge you to do so. If there are dozens as you claim, then naming four or five wouldn’t be a problem, now would it?
You once again demonstrate how the pathetic argue. As another example, you averred that the Popular Mechanics article, written by constructional engineers, which went into detail why the two planes that deliberately crashed into the twin towers on 9/11 could have done the damage they did was wrong. Gravenimage even provided you a link to that article. What was your response? That that article has been debunked and yet you provided NO sources, NO authorities, NO nothing, just as you have with the JFK conspiracy rot (and I remain convinced that you have not read Case Closed cover to cover and you know that I know that you know I know this).
You rather remind me of Christine Ford and her supporters who think an accusation with no proof is good enough. Well, for those who have not let their built-in crap detector they were born with get terribly rusty, as you have let yours, it is NOT good enough. And calling me “Biffo” only conveys to me how out of real arguments you truly are.
Finally, you harm the anti-jihad cause because you are a conspiracy loon (and you demonstrate you are time and time again by citing no reputable authorities for your loony contentions). I wish you would go away, but I want to be clear that I support your right not to go away, but I wish your egress from JW nonetheless. You are not helpful in combating what Islam intends for us all. Indeed, you are a negative in this regard. You won’t get this, but then there is so much you don’t get.
As ever I remain
Incorrigibly and factually oriented yours,
Wellington
gravenimage says
Is Christine another “Truther”? Good grief…
eduardo odraude says
Christine said,
Perfectly possible.
One of the planes that crashed into the WTC was a Boeing 767. The 767 is about 200 feet long. The fuel is carried in the wings and the section between the two wings. It flies about 500 feet per second or faster. That means that from the moment of impact, it would take less than half a second for the whole plane to pass into the interior of the WTC. Furthermore, only one-tenth or one-twentieth of a second would pass from the moment the leading edge of the wings/fuel tanks hit the building until the moment the wings and their fuel tanks had passed into the interior of the building. There is no reason to expect that the whole plane would blow up faster than one-tenth or one-twentieth of a second after the fuel tanks hit the building. And if you look at the footage of the impacts, the plane explosions do not appear to be delayed. Compare that footage to footage of other large airliners crashing and exploding. There is nothing abnormal in the 9/11 impacts and explosions, unless one is determined to maintain conspiracy theory at all costs.
Phantomfighter says
I’m A Commercial pilot. They broke in and sliced the heads of the Pilots. A Burgler need a permit to murder you, so he cant do it- ?right? You need a judge to sign a death warrant for you to be executed, but the Thug who enters your home to rape you and kill your children needs that firearm carry permit- Right? or he’s not allowed to? The Speeder going 90mph running from the police when he smashes your car rolling your minivan over and killing you whole family needed to follow the speed limit right? Well, You happen to be way off your rocker. And you probably did not know that these student/ private pilots flew in advanced simulators. Pilots need only 3 weeks in a Redbird sim to show their proficiency to learn piloting any piece of equipment they will be promoted to. These terrorists, baught and paid for by the Saudis, had milllions and HBV1 Visas, and trained for years, honey. I had my desktop version of Microsoft Simulator in 1995 and could do such things before I got my license in 1998. So get back to me when you can prove your ignorrent point otherwise remain the ill-informed dumbass your really show yourself to be. Good Day.
gravenimage says
Thank you, Phantomfighter.
James Lincoln says
Christine, I am not sure where you are getting your information from, but it is not correct.
The hijackers flew the commercial airliners in the most basic way. They took some basic lessons in advance simulators to cover only their task at hand: To take over an airliner that was already airborne and steer it into a building.
They were flying under VFR visual flight reference conditions and did not have to be instrument rated.
They did not have to know how to take off or land, or know any emergency procedures, etc.
Yes, it would take some technical expertise to pull it off but they were not stupid. Evil but not stupid.
And different flight parameters would give different results upon impact.
gravenimage says
+1
Indiana Tom says
Eh, Two Uncles were military pilots and it would not be difficult to fly an airliner into a skyscraper. Not so sure the towers would have gone down as a B26 multi engine bomber flew into the Empire State Building in WW2 and it did not go down.
Just don’t build them like they used to.
eduardo odraude says
It was a B-25 that crashed into the Empire State Building. The B-25 is a much smaller plane (60 or 70 feet long) than the two 767 passenger jets (200 feet long) that hit the WTC. The B-25 also flies more slowly than the 767 and carries much less fuel.
Rolf Wittwer says
A few small questions:
Is this old intolerant woman still planning to have her own “TV-Show” in the USA?
Does the Beggar-Clinton(Obama)-foundation still wants take over the US and the World?
Does she still try to run for “president”?
If yes – then really one must say, thas the US would go down to a political desaster, just as Germoney stays under Merkel, or even worse!
And: Retiree Clinton still believes she is the only one person, out of 328 MILLION US CITIZENS (minus kids, criminals etc.) who can do the job as president?
President D.Trump is really keeping many of his promises. One of them is to bring “Empress” Clinton to justice!
Hopefuly he will do so.
tedh754 says
HILLARY COMPARES 2016 ELECTION LOSS TO HOLOCAUST…FILM AT 11.
gravenimage says
+1
Indiana Tom says
Why worry about the Russians when the Chinese do things so much better.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-10-04/the-big-hack-how-china-used-a-tiny-chip-to-infiltrate-america-s-top-companies
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/10/04/vp-china-wants-a-different-american-president-details-efforts-to-divide-u-s-in-2018-2020/
eduardo odraude says
Walking Dead. Even after her career has been killed and killed again, it still comes back, zombie like, mindless and ravenous and destructive.
gravenimage says
Hillary Clinton likens totally unproven Russian election interference to 9/11
……………………
Moral insanity.
I am *no* fan of Russian trolls at their keyboards spamming their bs, but this *pales* before murderous Jihad terror.
tim gallagher says
As someone who lives in Australia, I have a couple of questions about Hillary Clinton. I’m a conservative, so I was happy that Trump won the election. I loathe creatures like the Clintons and all that side of politics. You know, Obama et al. They do so much damage and always weaken the western world. When Hillary called normal, everyday people “deplorables”, I thought she showed what a scumbag she is. Why would the Russians care about trying to stop Hillary Clinton from becoming President? Wouldn’t they just think, well, Clinton would be a piss weak, gutless President to deal with. I think they’d be more likely to want to stop a tough and nationalistic person like Trump from becoming President. My second question is, why has Hillary put up with Bill Clinton’s endless womanising throughout their grotesque joke of a marriage? I have zero respect for Hillary just on the basis of her putting up with Bill Clinton’s philandering. Is it that their marriage was always only about political power and that is why they have (bizarrely, to me) stayed together throughout all these years. Just a power couple and all that Hillary cared about, as far as the marriage was concerned, was power. And Hillary should definitely give up on all this whingeing and whining about why she lost the election and accept that she lost fair and square. She truly is such an unbelievably bitter old creature.
WPM says
She put up with Bill Clinton for so long because Bill Clinton is the likeable salesman ,with high intelligence combine with low morals .With her own mean ugly personality ,low intelligence ,she could not be a good real estate lawyer from backwater town she came from without with her intern chasing gold tongue ,cannot keep it in his pants husband. The marriage is more like a business arrangement ,two partners running a business do no even have to like each other that much as long the business is thriving .Now that the business of being president for Ms pantsuit is dead they can stew together in their own self made hell .I think we see little and heard nothing of Mr. Clinton these days because he is facing dementia .It is fitting she will spend her waning years stewing in her own bitter juices ,while Bill walks around the nursing home in an ill fitting robe exposing himself to the young nurses there.
tim gallagher says
Thanks for the reply, WPM. I’m sure you’ve summed up the Clinton’s joke of a marriage perfectly. I was thinking, since I wrote my earlier post, that, as far as power couples go, the Clintons have probably been the most successful ever, haven’t they. Bill Clinton making it to President and Hillary making it to Secretary of State and then running for President. They have been a very successful team who attained enormous power. As you say, their marriage is a business arrangement. I like your description of what Bill and Hillary face in the present and the future with Hillary and Bill stewing in their self-made hell. I must say I enjoy seeing Hillary being so bitter and frustrated.
Terry Gain says
I don’t doubt that Clinton was more bothered by her election loss than 9/11. Occasionally even very dishonest people speak the truth.
Kasey says
Is that why she ultimately got 3 million more votes than Trump and still lost. Don’t hear her calling for a more democratic system there tho’ so that can’t ever happen again. Maybe th e PC establishment likes it that way
Hogdude says
“What we know now is incredibly troubling … we have been attacked by a foreign power and have done nothing,” she said. I think Pogo answered her when he said “We have found the enemy and it is us”. This poor lady should pack her pantsuits and move to the clinic.
don vito says
I didn’t read all of your post just a few musings of yours, but while reading your musings a name came to my mind. Barbara Olsen. Barbara Olsen never came home from American flight 77 of September 11, 2001. What happened to her? Well this, “Barbara Olson
Olson.barbara.jpg
Born Barbara Kay Bracher
December 27, 1955
Houston, Texas, U.S.
Died September 11, 2001 (aged 45)
Arlington County, Virginia, U.S.
Cause of death Killed in the hijacking of American Airlines Flight 77 into The Pentagon (September 11 attacks)
Nationality American
Education Waltrip High School
Alma mater University of Saint Thomas (BA)
Yeshiva University (JD)
Occupation Political Commentator,
Lawyer
Years active 1990–2001
Known for Fox News and CNN commentator
Political party Republican
Spouse(s) Theodore Olson (1996–2001) If American flight 77 didn’t hit the Pentagon on 9/11/2001, what happened to Barbra Olson? Same for the other flights hijacked on 9/11/2001.
don vito says
the above in reply to Christine
Ann Marie says
The inability to go on and on about a loss in your life proves she has a mental illness and needs therapy.
And also to compare the Russian ‘interference’ (which didn’t happen) to 9/11 shows such an insensitivity for others and a complete narcissistic attitude on her part.
The only reason Dems are screaming Russian collusion is because their fraud tactics didn’t work in the last election and they’re upset..
Hillary Clinton: the perfect example of the word: ‘hag’
Jean says
What a person who believes in the possibility of “Russian interference” disintegrating American democracy is REALLY saying, is that he or she does not believe democracy as such to be operable in the US… since such a person in fact is claiming that ordinary people are unable to distinguish between trustworthy and untrustworthy sources, and of forming their own, qualified opinions, separating wheat from chaff.
Mrs. Clinton is thus basically stating that she considers her own people to a bunch of idiots not capable of handling the power to vote.
Thank you, I guess.
TKF says
Hillary is a Nosferatu, the un-dead. The only way to stop her is to hammer a wooden stake through her heart….the only trouble is, she doesn’t have a heart.
TKF says
Hillary is like a Nosferatu, the un-dead. The only way to stop her is to hammer a wooden stake through her heart….the only trouble is, she doesn’t have a heart.
jack says
after her betrayal of the US ambassador in Benghazi, who would trust a word she says?