In this new video, I discuss a recent New York Times article decrying the fact that an increasing number of people are realizing that Islam is a political and social system, as well as a religion.
In this new video, I discuss a recent New York Times article decrying the fact that an increasing number of people are realizing that Islam is a political and social system, as well as a religion.
Terry Gain says
America’s foremost scholar of Islam explains that Islam is not just a religion but a totalitarian supremacist political ideology.
The issue for those who cherish freedom and equality of citizenship is whether the former (the religion) can be divorced from the latter ( the totalitarian – and violent- supremacist political ideology).
I think clearly not. 1400 years of Jihad says no.
Terry Gain says
I respectfully disagree with Mr. Spencer’s statement that no one wants to restrict Muslims from practicing their religion. There are numerous dogmas of Islam that enlightened people should not hesitate to condemn and forbid, to wit:,
1. The commands to kill unbelievers.
2. The references to Christians and Jews as Apes and Pigs.
3. The belief that Muslims are superior.
4. The dogma of a carnal paradise with perpetual erections and ever virgins.n
5. The nonsense that one who dies while killing for God receives an eternal reward of 72 virgins,
6. Polygamy
7. FGM
8. Honor Killing
9. The Triple Talaq.
10. Dhimmitude
11. Jizya
12. Taqiyya
13. Bloody Annoying Victimhood
14. Etc, etc, etc.
Terry Gain says
And Linda Sarsour
mortimer says
Terry, MOST OF ISLAM is ALREADY ILLEGAL under US LAW.
– slavery, fgm, child marriage, vigilantism, jihad terrorism, jizzya-extortion, etc., etc. You have mentioned a number of ways in which ISLAM IS ALREADY ILLEGAL.
Muslims cannot FULLY PRACTICE their religion under the US CONSTITUTION.
You have misunderstood the purport of what Mr. Spencer eloquently said. I recommend you listen again two times to get all his nuances.
Terry Gain says
Mortimer
Mr. Spencer said Muslims should be allowed to practise their religion. You and I have explained why they should not. So you have a lot of splaining to do.
Raja says
I fully agree with Mortimer the great and Terry.
May I add:
As a free society, Muslims can practice whatever they like but the state should stand guard against the evils of Islam and must be vocal about it too. Remember, a good antithesis for Sharia should be to speak or expose the evils of Islam and it will wilt under the weight of the state’s role. I have met a couple of Islamic proselytes whose first conversation about Islam starts with the premise that Mohd is considered to be a prophet by us.(Not the US)
mortimer says
Terry, RE-READ WHAT THOMAS JEFFERSON SAID … It still applies to this … he said about someone else’s manner of worship …
” … it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my legs.”
However, JIHAD BREAKS LEGS with JIHAD TERRORISM and PICKS POCKETS with JIZZYA.
If someone bangs his head on the floor DOZENS OF TIMES every day, it does not harm me.
THE CIVIL PART OF ISLAM is mostly ILLEGAL … not the worship ceremonies.
gravenimage says
Terry, Robert Spencer just meant Muslims are free to practice the–admittedly few–aspects of their faith that don’t violate civilized Infidel laws.
Terry Gain says
GI
Well then obviously he meant that Muslims shouldn’t be allowed to practise their religion, since the whole point of the ideology is conquest.
mortimer says
Thanks, GI, for your perfectly succinct summary.
I thought Mr. Spencer stated his views very clearly and very succinctly.
I don’t know why people cannot understand perfectly what he said.
The CEREMONIES of Islam are legal, but the CIVIL LAW and CRIMINAL LAW aspects of Islam are ILLEGAL.
ronyvo says
Quite interesting few replies. The 13 points by Jerry is one of them. The summary and concise collecting the nonsense of this criminal system is a guide for those who disagree of the idea that Islam is not a religion.
Actually, I’ve published the idea right after 9/11 and formed a petition to the useless UN to declare that Islam is not a religion. But, didn’t go anywhere.
However, I am glad that Mr. Spencer is reviving this fact. Muslims are using religion as weapon to spread their evil ‘faith’.
Dave says
Sarsour means ‘cockroach’ FYI. Also Anjem Choudary for the list
Wellington says
Islam is definitely a religion but it is also a political, totalitarian ideology and its legal system applies to EVERYONE, contra the religious law of other faiths that only apply to followers of that religion, for instance Roman Catholic canon law and Judaic law.
What to do? First of all, don’t waste your time arguing Islam is not a religion. This is a total dead end approach.
Second, admit that Islam is a religion but a wicked one and in the same metaphorical breath note that nowhere is it written that a religion must be good, as another example of this, Satanism.
Third, extend to Islam the same “courtesy” extended to such secular totalitarian ideologies like Marxism and Nazism, i.e., they are permitted, they are legal (I’m here confining myself to American law), but they are widely viewed, deservedly so, as malevolent belief systems for losers—yes, push the “loser aspect” about every Muslim as one would for a Neo-Nazi, anarchist, Trotskyite, et al.
Fourth, put Islam on very public notice that free societies know what it is about and that free people fully comprehend it would end liberty if only given the chance. Yes, the Islamic world must know that free people know that Islam is absolutely wretched where the preservation of liberty is concerned.
Fifth, end Muslim immigration to Western nations for the same reason why admitted Marxists, Neo-Nazis, anarchists, syndicalists, et al. are denied entry to a Western country. Find whatever legal pretext to do so. Even change constitutional law to do so on the premise that no constitution of a free polity should function as a suicide pact.
Sixth, mock Islam because the next best thing to crushing iniquity is to make fun of it.
Seventh, let Muslims know very publicly that they can believe the rot they do but they cannot necessarily act upon the rot they believe in, for instance the killing of apostates or engaging in polygamy. If they do act upon obnoxious, heinous elements allowed by Islam, such as the two I just noted (and there are many others like the sanctioning of rape), then prosecute the bastards to the maximum under the law.
Well, this is is just a “warm-up guide” respecting how to deal with the worst religion of all time. Always remember that Western Civilization explored freedom like no other civilization in history and that Islam is horribly retrograde in this respect to this very day. Yeah, proceed from here and thereafter act accordingly. Ah, if only the elites in the West—in the political realm, academia and the media—would, en masse, grasp what I have written above. Sadly, far from this still and herein points to the ultimate problem about Islam, which is NOT Islam itself, but continued ignorance and excuse making for Islam by non-Muslims, especially those with power and influence.
Terry Gain says
Wellington
I respectfully disagree that we should concede that Islam is a religion. In my opinion the very concept of religion is maligned if we concede that an ideology which commands that believers kill non-believers, that promises a carnal paradise for those who die while killing for God and that treats females as sex objects and infidel women and children as fair game for sex is nevertheless a religion. Not to mention that the man who invented this ideology and is considered the ideology’s perfect man was a murderer of critics, a mass murderer of enemies, a slave taker, a sexual slave taker, a rapist and a pedophile.
An ideology which you say is wicked, and it clearly is, is per se, not a religion.
The courtesy we should extend to Islam is to bar further entry to adherents while allowing those who are here the rights of all people on American soil.
It makes no sense to acknowledge that Islam is a religion and then say it should be mocked. Most Americans respect religion. Islam should be mocked because it is irrational and barbaric and pretends to be a religion, but Islam can’t be effectively mocked if we concede that it is a religion.
Islamic dogma is incompatible with American values. We are on a collision ncourse.
As I have been saying for years, if we don’t have a Cold War with Islam, we will either have submission or a hot war. Let the Cold War begin.
gravenimage says
Not all religions have been good, Terry.
The worship of Moloch demanded the burning of infants, and the religion of the Aztecs human sacrifice.
It’s just that most faiths today are good–or at least fairly benign.
Wellington says
Beat me, gravenimage, by three minutes on the Aztec religion.
Gee, I do wish more people would comprehend that arguing that Islam is not a religion retards, not advances, dealing with iniquitous Islam in an optimal fashion.
Terry Gain says
Religions are grated special respect and tolerance because they are by definition benign. Islam is an evil ideology that not only tolerates but commands all manner of evil. Islam is not even close to being a religion.
Conceding that Islam is a religion maligns and insults all religions.
This is a hill for the religious to die on.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Wellington.
mortimer says
Aztec priests offered human sacrifices to Acolnahuacatl (the god of war), Huitzilopochtli (the god of day) and Tezcatlipoca (the god of night), but in the modern world such barbaric savagery is outlawed.
The Islamic savagery of sacrificing humans to the hoax-god Allah must also be outlawed.
Muslims are not allowed to be bounty hunters for Allah.
Wellington says
I would simply ask you, Terry, as I have rhetorically asked many times here over the years at JW, where is it written that a religion must be good? I for one think a belief system can be partially, mostly or entirely wicked and yet still a religion. Again I proffer the example of Satanism. Care to dismiss Satanism too as not being a religion? If so, why? Because it is evil? Well then, you are engaging in a circular argument.
And while we’re at it, how about the ancient Aztec religion which called for human sacrifice, the ancient Carthaginian religion also—these were not religions as well? I submit (not meant in an Islamic way) that you are proceeding on an assumption, and on an assumption only, but erroneously proceeding as though it is an axiom, that a religion must be benevolent. Big mistake I would contend. Rooted only in expectation and sentiment and nothing else.
In any case, and I write this as a lawyer, here in America there is absolutely zero chance that Islam, for First Amendment purposes, would be deemed by virtually any federal or state judge at present not a religion entitled to First Amendment protection. Were I an American judge, I would accord Islam religious protection—as I would Satanism, the ancient Aztec faith, et al. But I would also judicially opine that said religion be understood to be inimical to liberty and the American Constitution.
And EVEN IF, assuming the virtually impossible here, that Islam were deemed by the American judiciary not a religion, it would STILL be a protected belief system just as Marxism and Nazism are. So, it would be a Pyrrhic victory at best if you could, here in America, finally get Islam not recognized as a religion—which ain’t gonna’ happen anyway.
Complete waste of time, Terry; an exercise in arid theory to legal Nowheresville, to pursue the route of Islam not being a religion. Please direct your attentions to the other matters I mentioned in my 5:21 P.M. post above. I would vigorously argue they are the far more efficacious route to follow.
Terry Gain says
Wellington
We have the capacity and obligation to define what constitutes a religion. Being benign is an essential requirement of a religion. If Islam is granted the protection of a religion, it will continue to expand until it is the only religion.
Nowheresvile is a good word to describe the current approach.
Terry Gain says
Wellington
How is it even possible for Islam to be considered a religion in the United States? Have you abolished the First Amendment?
Wellington says
Terry: You just don’t get it. Going the route of disallowing Islam as a religion is futile. Also unconstitutional. What is imperative is to accurately describe it for the wretched, control-freak, liberty-destroying religion that it is.
And no, I have not abolished the First Amendment, but it seems you are willing to.
I would be interested, Terry, if you could name me here in the US any federal or state judge, or any law professor, who has opined that Islam should not be granted First Amendment protection as a religion. And even should you be able to name one or two, this would still leave thousands of judges and law professors who would not agree with you.
And will you get this as well and as I have conveyed to you before: EVEN IF Islam were denied First Amendment protection as a religion, it would still be granted First Amendment protection as a belief system, just as two other horrid belief systems are—Marxism and Nazism. See, it’s all a route to legal Nowheresville. Gotta’ move on, Terry, and focus on what is really important, i.e, exposure of Islam as nefarious rather than wasting time on the “Islam is not a religion” contention.
Terry Gain says
Wellington
Has the issue of whether Islam is a religion ever been litigated in the United States? I assume not. If not, then you can’t say the issue has been decided. And you haven’t addressed my point as to how “a religion” that is in opposition to the First Amendment in two respects (separation of Church and State and freedom of speech) can nevertheless be considered a legitimate religion.
Even a losing case would be a conscious raising event of monumental proportions. It would do what is now not being done: make Islam an issue that is being discussed in the public square.
Brian hoff says
Terry you donot have the right to define religio . The -IAU voted illegal to say that Pluto isnot than planet alots of scientist are saying that IAU doesnot that right. Satanic is than religish and there are satanist rites taken place all over the world and it include human and animals sacrifice.
Wellington says
Terry: A religion does not have to agree with the principle of the separation of church and state and with freedom of speech in order to be considered a religion for First Amendment purposes—again you treat an assumption of yours as a fact. And here’s why in a nutshell: Belief is virtually sacrosanct under the First Amendment (and that’s why adhering to Marxism, which would destroy freedom of speech if given the opportunity, ditto for Nazism, is protected under the First Amendment) but many actions upon certain beliefs are not. Gee, this is first-year law school stuff.
Terry Gain says
Wellington
Marxism does not claim to be a religion. I think you assume too much and give in too easily. We anti-jihadists would benefit greatly from the litigation of the issue. They vast majority have not even considered it. Litigation of the issue would do something which has yet to be done: cause the public to examine Islam.
PRCS says
To Muslims, it’s a religion.
Wellington says
Terry: Good luck with the litigation of this issue. I predict your “attempt” would not even be heard by an American court of law, let alone succeed.
Exposing Islam as iniquitous is key. Arguing it is not a religion is futile but, again, lots of luck with this. I wonder what steps you have in mind to pursue this avenue of thought of yours.
Dave says
What are the differences between Islam and Satanism?They both worship the same god.
Lydia Church says
islam is an evil religion!
So is satanism, witchcraft, etc.
They all worship something, it’s just not God!
Terry Gain says
Lydia
If an ideology bis evil, it is by definition not a religion. Satanism and witchcraft are not religions. Religions connect us to a loving God, not to the devil or a being that gratuitously sets man upon man.
Raja says
+1
Raja says
That was to Terry
Indiana Tom says
Islam might be a religion, but not as we in the Western World would know it.
In my opinion Islam is a product from Satan and a perversion of the Gospel, but I think the same thing about The Kingdom Of The Cults. Just remember, I am really not that religious.
Brian hoff says
Islam have nothing to do with satanist or witchcraft. You are just than uneducated christian demonizing Islam.
Indiana Tom says
You really need to read Muslim records of the nature of the revelations given to Mighty Mo. Mo was in agony. Mo could not breathe. Mo was in darkness. Mo had problems divining whether the revelation was from Allah or Shaitan. It just goes on and on.
Then we have islam,s pagan moon god origins and the pagan meteor.
Then we have the topical nature and ethics of islam promoting pedophilia, racism, mass murder, wars, lying, degradation of women, the list goes on and on.
Raja says
Islam is not a faith-based system and therefore cannot be or should not be called religion, although it has tinges of so-called godliness. About two thousand years ago religion meant godliness (see: 1 Tim 3:16 :
By common confession, great is the mystery of GODLINESS: He who was revealed in the flesh, Was vindicated in the Spirit, Seen by angels, Proclaimed among the nations, Believed on in the world, Taken up in glory. and subsequent centuries religion was considered belief-system.
It is worth noting that the KJV also uses the term godliness whereas the modern translations use the word RELIGION.
The term religion itself has gone through a sea change for little over a century thanks to Karl Marx and his loony followers.
Today it is considered to be a belief-system but Islam is a lot more than that. It is a system that denies God, Christ and the fall of the human race. It seeks global dominance through every institution, method and it is CONSTANTLY under war with all infidels The means to this war is EVERYTHING IMMORAL INCLUDING LIES, DECEIT, rape, slavery, dacoity, forced marriages, You name it, they’ve got it.
Raja says
Sorry for the confusing choice of words:
About two thousand years ago religion meant godliness (see: 1 Tim 3:16 and several other verses):
It should read:
After about two thousand years the term GODLINESS has been replaced by today’s loosely used term religion or popularly so-called belief system. Today it is also considered to be matters or rules relating to God.
jewdog says
You mean to say that Islam is BOTH a religion and a political system? I’m not sure that my tiny brain can accommodate such different aspects of something at once. It’s like saying that my cat is a loving pet as well as a cold-blooded killer, at least when it comes to mice. I suppose it’s also like fire: It can cook your food as well as burn down your house. If the NY Times can’t cope with such a daunting concept, then how will your average shmo be able to?
Debi Brand says
“You mean to say that Islam is BOTH a religion and a political system?”
Indeed–a governing system that includes an alleged “religion”; conversely, an alleged “religion” that has as its core its own governing/security system.
PRCS says
Good analogies.
Being owned by two cats, this shmo understands the logic.
CogitoErgoSum says
From reading these comments I can see there are many people who want to define religion on their own terms. I’m with Wellington on this one. I do not find that religion automatically has to be good. Some religions can be bad. Islam is a religion which encroaches upon nearly every aspect of a person’s life — and even the lives of those who do not belong to the religion. It’s a religion by which a god demands the right to rule both the spiritual and the physical world and demands submission from everyone. When dealing with anything concerning spiritual worlds and worshiping and/or submitting to a god (or gods), you are dealing with religion.
Michael Copeland says
“No one can regard any field of his affairs as personal and private. …..
… the Islamic State bears a kind of resemblance to the Fascist and Communist states”
Abul Ala Maududi.
https://libertygb.org.uk/news/extremism-–-there-problem-within-islam
PRCS says
” I do not find that religion automatically has to be good.”
Agree with you and Wellington on that.
infidel says
yes!! Islam is INDEED a very political sys in and out and that in itself leads to another Islamic TRUISM from the annals of the infidel:
Muslims are one of the most political people that U will ever meet in that they will politic their way to the top of any org where they enter, esp in host infidel countries. Most Muslim leaders do not do the hard yakka that is required to earn leadership. Instead, they rely on their race card, minority status, Islamophobia, and of course their biggest trump card. their bloc vote power to climb astride the leadership pyramid..Muslims are masters in wheeling and dealing and fibbing half truths and even outright lies to flummox their non Muslim competition and they are also masters in spreading VICIOUS RUMORS about their competition and also the existing non-Muslim leadership. Their only goal is to replace the non-Muslim leadership and let Islam take over the host infidel nation. That is why, I would never believe the smooth praising talk of Muslims, esp when they suck up to U for favors…they are TROJAN IN AND OUT!!!
infidel says
Let me also add here that Muslims are established masters in creating complete chaos in their non-Muslim host society and create unbridgeable DIVIDES within their hosts, which they ruthlessly exploit to enable the host society to be eventually taken over by Islam. See the vicious RIGHT-LEFT divide in the Greater West as well as in democracies like India and Israel.. Islam is the chief cause of this…I have been saying this for many years now.. Also, when Muslims spread vicious rumors in the host infidel society about their host leadership, they will make it look like as if these vicious rumors are coming from the host non-Muslims themselves, esp those that are aligned innocently/ naively/ facultatively with them like the LEFT is today.
infidel says
As an example…most of the vicious rumors against Trump and the Reps in general, THE MUSLIMS ARE THE CHIEF SOURCE, but they will make it look like as if it is the Dems who are behind this.. Similarly, the ban on Robert Spencer from entering the UK is by the Muslims, but they will make it look like as if the UK Lib Left is behind this.. Similarly, all the anti Hindu, anti Modi vicious rumors are spread by Muslims, but they will make it look like as if it is the Indian Left that is doing this. Experts in firing the gun at their opponents from the shoulder of others. They do this until their numbers build up and then when they know that they have the numerical strength, they will drop the facade and attack U DIRECTLY as is happening in Islamic states like Pak, MiddleEast, etc etc.
Gerald Mucci says
Our popular and legal understanding of the definition of “religion” is NOT up to the task of defending our Constitution, our nation and our freedoms from the unique, all-encompassing aspects of Islam. Islam is unlike any other religion on the planet due to its unique coercive mandate applied to both Muslims and all non-Muslims.
We need to consider the Islamic ideology in terms of the PREPONDERANCE of its political influence relative to its “religious” component. Given the preponderance of Islam’s political influence we must treat Islam overall as a seditious ideology in the same sense as any other group or individual whose intent it is to influence the restriction our freedoms or the overthrow of our government.
Gerald Mucci says
Our popular and legal understanding of the definition of “religion” is NOT up to the task of defending our Constitution, our nation and our freedoms from the unique, all-encompassing aspects of Islam. Islam is unlike any other religion on the planet due to its unique coercive mandate applied to both Muslims and all non-Muslims.
We need to consider the Islamic ideology in terms of the PREPONDERANCE of its political influence relative to its “religious” component. Given the preponderance of Islam’s political influence we must treat Islam overall as a seditious ideology in the same sense as any other group or individual whose intent it is to promote the restriction of our freedoms or the overthrow of our government.
Michael Copeland says
Notice the sly way Asma T. Uddin tells us how to think (text shown at 4:17). This is done by “planting”. It is the same process used by the interviewer on UK television who said “With me here is controversial far right politician……”.
Uddin “plants” what position the readers should take by means of a condescending introduction. What sensible readers like you should continue to regard as “an absurd fringe argument”, as it “once” was, has, Oh Dear, “gained momentum”. This induces the unwary reader to view everything that follows in an unfavourable light, to belittle it, and regard it with disbelief.
Of course, Uddin offers nothing to disprove the statements made by the speakers she disparages.
Kasey says
Just how can speaking the truth be a disturbing trend, particularly when discussing Islam???????
WPM says
Islam is a bad religion ,and a bad political movement all in one package. It is sold by huckster salesmen, they do not like people pointing out the truth in the snake oil they are selling. You can debate; criticize ,make fun of any region, political idea, except Islam because it lacks any logic , reason or sanity, it is a house of cards that falls down on the first breeze of reason comes along. It only stays on the market ,because its sellers omit and keep the masses in the dark on its true nature ,laws, and violent commands that its followers must do to stay in the good graces of its violent slave master god allah. I agree with Wellington, that you cannot outlaw it only marginize it and force it followers to obey our rule of law . If head hunters, came to America they would not be allowed to collect heads in their religious belief system either, as a religious protected right.
Theo Prinse says
Anti islam fighter Geert Wilders of the Dutch Freedom Party has presented an initiatief law prohibiting islam in the Netherlands.
Article 1
Islam is not a religion or a philosophy of life, but a violent one,
a totalitarian ideology.
Article 2
1. The following Islamic expressions are prohibited:
a. mosques;
b. schools;
c. Quran;
d. wearing a burqa or nikaab.
2. The first paragraph, under a, must also be understood to mean every space used as an Islamic prayer house or prayer room, unless this takes place in the homely atmosphere.
3. All educational institutions as referred to in the first paragraph, under b, where the Islamic ideology is taught are forbidden.
4. The printing, distribution or sale of the Qur’an as mentioned in the first paragraph, under c, is prohibited.
5. Wearing a burqa or nikaab as meant in the first Paragraph (d) is prohibited unless it takes place in the home environment.
6. Anyone who participates in the utterances mentioned in the first member of this article under a and b and the second and third paragraphs of this article, or this facilitates or organizes, is punishable.
—————-
The problem is in art.2 ‘unless this takes place in the homely atmosphere.’ and art. 5. ‘unless it takes place in the home environment.’
Art 4. has no such exclusion ‘unless the quran or the printing of the quran is present or takes place in the private home’.
The entire Islamic terror system including its sharia law is either a danger to free western science and intellectualism and must be uprooted from the entire public domain and especially in the private homes of muslims, jihadis alike or it will NOT change ANYTHING to the danger islam represents for the western democratic values even by differentiating between their sharia law and the entire islamic instruction of oppression as mr Spencer does.
WPM says
Nazism I think is against the law in the Netherlands ,it is not against the law in America .Two different countries and different laws apply. Islam is a religion trying to say its not just clouds the issue ,it is a dangerous cult that needs violent to stay alive. Sharia law is the law the cult wants to use oppress the nonbelievers that is just one reason it can not be practiced as written in western civilization ,like head hunting, cannibalism , human sacrifice ,slavery all are against common western law. Just used common law enforce it ,do not give Islam a pass to use it under the bander of religious freedom. Lets stop giving murdering, raping, slaving ,violent thugs a pass to practice their cult under the bander of religious freedom..
UNCLE VLADDI says
Islam is only a “religion” – of crime!
Socrates once said:
“The superstitious people only worship the gods because they are afraid not to!”
Leftopaths prefer to “feel” (not think) there are no real crimes nor criminals because we’re all really ever only equally helpless “fellow victims” of unknown and unknowable (yet also strangely assessed as “inevitable”) forces beyond our comprehension and control, so the only real crime is to “hatefully” accuse an equally helpless fellow victim of being a “criminal” just for committing “crimes” (you know, by choosing to attack thereby innocent other people first) as if there was no real difference between that sort of “victim” and those whom they choose to victimize!
And who “thinks” this way? Only excuse-making criminals! And the usual excuse is gang-might-made rights.
Ditto for islam, with the unknown and unknowable idol “allah” as the main inevitable-force crime excuse.
Muslims use their idea of a “god” as an excuse for their own criminal desires and activities, exactly as their founder, Muhammad Abd’Allah, (“Slave of Allah”) did.
Islam isn’t a religion (much less one “Of Peace!”) nor a race (much less one of swarthy victimals “Of Color”) at all – it’s only the world’s largest and oldest ongoing global crime-cult and murder gang, and extortion racket whose holy-mobster “muslim” gang members’ main excuse for their crimes is to say:
“GOD TOLD US TO COMMIT THESE CRIMES! CAPISCE?!”
😉
TJFreedomjihad says
Agree….Impeccable reasoning, IMO, especially the big paragraph, right out of the “feeling” type of current American Frankfurt schooled, college professors socialist’s sociology class’s “internecine” Gordian knot “reasoning” (or brainwashing) evident there, about the only humorous part of your IMO, deadly serious and accurate logic.
It is exactly how I’ve found the big picture reasoning behind what the little filthy shrimp created and why. A great way to “make a living” and get to be a “best of people” type and lord it over all who disagree, (the pure gang, “thug”, aspect), and coincidently have herds of women for recreation, and for the heck of it, keep them in their place, to boot, (as left hand and right hand booty, too) (perhaps where modern songs and parlance get their term for women’s hind ends, now known cheaply, as booty), to be blunt. And throw in the “god actually want’s you, command’s you, to do the crimes, every imaginable one possible. Dream up some fake Johnny Carson type religious behaviors, and you’re home freer than the church of pot!!! ‘Cause fear, man, fear’, and pain!!!
Little “filthy shrimp founder” of islam knew what the demorats know now, the likes of which is immortalized on video, and transcripts, the demorats who now depend on the ignorance, brainwashing and miss-education of the many suckers to put anything dictatorial, or fraudulent, over on them, they’ll follow along like dumb sheep, such as with Johnny Gruber D MIT, Benny Rhodes D Yale, with the giant frauds committed upon “the American sheep” on Obamacare, Iran. They said it bald faced. http://thegoodnewstoday.org/judge-gruber-obama-administration-should-be-charged-with-conspiracy-to-commit-fraud-to-pass-obamacare/ Benny Rhodes liar, “From aspiring novelist to chief spinner of the president’s lies.”: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/262811/obamas-master-deceit-iran-nuke-deal-joseph-klein
It may be instructive to note that maxi and nancy are both using the threat of “revenge” to all who would not let them regain the House control, threatening a kind of revitalized “scorched earth” “revenge” https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tammy-bruce-the-democrats-never-ending-meltdown
They sound so gang like, islamic like. I’ve included all this modern reality, to show the extreme danger we are in, and not just America. History tends to repeat for the gullibly dumb, lazy, and sloppy!
But resistance and knowledge is rising, especially among the experienced eastern Europeans, number one of the heroic nation’s decisions of resistance to the EU and their invading muslim hordes, which is Hungary, and now several other courageous nations, all of which suffered terribly more than once by muslim depredations and destructions, even the Soviet’s depredations, and some at the nazis hands. They have been there, with a history, and want no more of it yet again. They know, largely. For them, they see “prevent”, not correct. “Too late” they have seen, if not “prevented”, before “too late”. They know and understand, the real “resistance” to the invasion of the marauding hordes of moors, ottomans, modern day equivalents, etc. They know the Armenian genocide, the Turks. They know, many of them, very well. And even in America, the seemingly soft naïve brainwashed underbelly of the world, resistance and knowledge is rising. Left and right coasts notwithstanding……
I dearly love and support Robert Spencer’s constant professionalism and decorum, tireless is his teaching, wholly respected and needed, by me, and all. But, IMO, it is up to the suffering, and about to suffer masses, to tie together the full logic behind this non-Aztec, non-assassins, non-simple cult, scourge of the globe. Remember, the nazi similarities, and alliances, and dalliances, which had been, must have been, destroyed by massive opposing conquering unremitting forces, of the allied Commanded Forces, initiated almost too late to succeed, given the closeness of German I+RCBM and jet propulsion, and nuclear technology research. Yes, they had a formal uniformed military, but remember, we’ve and others through history have been fighting these dangerous destructive hating losers for a long, long, 1400 years. And yet the idea of nazism (so similar to islam minus the Johnny Carson “wolf in sheep’s clothing” cloaking in “religious” theatrics and “santy claus hats”), was so pervasive to some people’s sick, weak, or disturbed minds, many still, on hitler’s birthday, gather in private homes to celebrate, together. Yet today. And the demorats have a strange dangerous affinity for islam, well demonstrated. http://thefederalist.com/2018/11/01/democratic-party-working-destroy-american-way-life/
So make of all this devil’s stew pot of evil as you will, but I am with the knowledge this is a gang!
TJFreedomjihad says
Sorry, this should have been included after …maxi and nancy….revenge….
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-01/revenge-adam-schiff-maxine-waters-vow-supercharge-trump-investigations-if-dems-take ,