“Balraj Singh, 23, was the only man convicted of abusing her.”
That’s a Sikh name. Balraj Singh may be a convert to Islam, or just a non-Muslim joining in this savage behavior, but in any case it is noteworthy that he is the only person convicted. The overwhelming majority of the perpetrators in these rape gangs are Muslim. Is the British government still afraid to prosecute them, for fear of being called “Islamophobic”?
“Girl raped by up to 70 Telford sex gang paedos from age of 12 saw just ONE convicted over vile crimes,” by Lauren Fruen, The Sun, September 29, 2018:
The victim was pregnant at 13 and suffered four years of abuse and faced death threats from the network of paedophiles in the town.
The girl – whose ordeal only ended when she fled Telford aged 16 – told The Sunday Mirror the men ‘stole her childhood’ and said all she wants “is justice”.
She added: “All I want is justice, because the men who raped me are walking around scot free.
“I am terrified they’re doing what they did to me to other innocent young girls in Telford.
The now 19-year-old said she bumps into her abusers ‘every time she goes home’.
Balraj Singh, 23, was the only man convicted of abusing her.
He was jailed for three and a half years for sexual activity with a child, according to reports….
Walter Sieruk says
Those vile and heinous Muslim bands with their misogynist practice gang raping of females, both girls and women, is a heinous Islamic affront and crime against all the is good ,decent and right. In this specific case of that British girl who was Muslims gang raped in England is an extreme act of evil which is most heinous are worse than despicable. This Islamic wickedness of Muslim gang rape against that young British girl also reflects of Muslim arrogant hateful Islamic contempt towards females as well and Muslim hate and contempt for Western civilization Western laws an d Western people. They and other such violent vile and hideous gangs of Islamic street hooligans are criminals as well as vicious and malicious and even murderous are gangs that are made up of malice-filled thugs who aren’t able to ,create or make anything of value or worth They are useless for anything that is good of constructive , they are only violent vile and destructive . As much so that those heinous hoodlums are, in many ways, similar to the villains described in the Bible. Which reads “Their feet are swift to shed blood; Destruction and misery are in their ways; and the way of peace they have not known.” Romans 3:15-17. [N.K.J.V.]
Furthermore, the awful individuals who compose those lawless ruffians are characters who are nothing original. Such hooligans have come and gone throughout history and none of them have even amounted to so much a “hill of beans.” As for those hideous street criminal hooligans not even being anything original. Such brutal violent gangs go back in history as far as to ancient times. For example the Bible in Proverbs 4:16,17. It is written “For they do not sleep unless they have done evil; and their sleep is taken away unless they make someone fall. For they eat the bread of wickedness; and drink the wine of violence.”
Nevertheless, those criminal characters aren’t going to get away with their evil behavior. It will all, sooner or later come back down on them and come back down on them hard. For as is the old saying “What goes around comes around.” The reason that we may all know that this saying is true is because it’s upheld in the Bible. Which teaches “For whatever a man sows, that he will also reap.” Galatians 6:7.
Clive Stephen Delmonte says
I think the best way forward for the Brits may be to make sure that women and children in Telford and elsewhere go about securely outnumbered by male friends. This behaviour may seem strange when first encountered but it should draw world attention to the situation confronting women where it is unsafe for women to go about unprotected.
This may start to embarrass the police, the Home Office and others.
Telford, Rotherham and suchlike places have become nogo areas for women in our green and pleasant land.
Seb Pyle says
we should already be embarrassed by the numbers of women running around in burkas. the authorities do nothing.
Jay says
England is lost! Where is the outrage from their parliament and PM Teresa May??
And this is not the only problem caused by the unfettered invasion of illegal immigrants .
Not to mention the cost to the tax paying citizens, who provide these ungrateful invaders with welfare and housing and health care to prevent all the diseases they arrive with from causing an epidemic.
And then there is the numerous terror attacks….. on the parliament, the bridges, the malls, the restaurants, concerts, etc etc. England is lost…..where is the outrage!
God save the queen and the English people.
marble says
Most regrettably, it seems that QE II and others in power have no concern for the English people or any others, just control of the earth. She is no QE I.
StellaSaidSo says
Not a fair comparison. Elizabeth I had real power. Elizabeth II has no power. She has the right to advise her PM, but cannot tell him/her what to do.
marble says
QE I fought great powers with few resources; QE II has great wealth and much power either unknown or ignored by the public. Maybe the herd of today is much more willing to be culled than that of centuries e before.
StellaSaidSo says
marble,
There is a huge difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy.
Jay says
England is lost! Where is the outrage from their parliament and PM Teresa May??
And this is not the only problem caused by the unfettered invasion of illegal immigrants .
Not to mention the cost to the tax paying citizens, who provide these ungrateful invaders with welfare and housing and health care to prevent all the diseases they arrive with from causing an epidemic.
And then there is the numerous terror attacks….. on the parliament, the bridges, the malls, the restaurants, concerts, the no go zones, etc etc. England is lost…..where is the outrage!
God save the queen and the English people.
R Russell says
I would really like God to save all the people of the UK and not just English people
Laura says
QE2 is concerned only with getting into the Guinness Book of Records as the longest reigning English monarch, ever.
StellaSaidSo says
QEII has already achieved this record.
Tricia Stuercke says
Robert Spencer, I honestly thank God for you, & I thank YOU for answering His obvious call to make this your passion & your work!
Otherwise, after reading this I feel only utter disgust, the near-urge to vomit, & the need to cry…when that’s subsided, I’ll be on my knees before The Lord, more fervently & urgently than ever. Muslims (& apparently the random Sihk?) are truly Satan’s Army! May God Almighty shield us from the HATRED & WRATH of ISLAM!
gravenimage says
UK: Girl raped by up to 70 members of Muslim rape gang sees just one perp convicted
…………………
Just appalling.
mortimer says
The perpetrators remain free to rape again, while Tommy Robinson is PERSECUTED for demanding the perpetrators be LOCKED UP.
Leon Degney says
Great isn’t it, shoot the messenger. What a sickening, sickly bunch of useless “leaders”.
gravenimage says
Yes–very ugly.
Bro. Ignatius Mary says
You said:
“And yes–pedophile is a loaded term, if by that he means that decent people do indeed consider *raping prepubscent children to be a bad thing*.
The idea that calling those who are gang raping a child pedophiles is like calling an African-American the “N” word is *sickening calumny*.
The claim that we should be ashamed of ourselves for condemning the gang rape of a child is just grotesque. *Ugh*.”
————————
You see, this is what I mean. I did not say or suggest that we should not condemn the gang rape of a child. That IS NOT WHAT I SAID, and you know it.
“decent people do indeed consider *raping prepubscent children to be a bad thing*”
Yes, it is, but 12 year old are not prepubescent. It is equally horrify to rape 11-`14 year old or 15-19 year olds. NO ONE disputes that. NO ONE.
My post was about journalistic integrity. In journalism, a reporter is suppose to be accurate. That means using the correct term and not a sensational term to sell papers.
The mis-uxe of the term pedophile is incendiary because it garners up the hatred of people. It is like “fighting words” or a man riling up a crowd to riot. It the term fits, then use it, if the term is inaccurate, then use the correct term. That is what reporters are suppose to dp.
The comparison to using the wrong term here with the “n” word is accurate. It is the use of a incendiary word, which the “n” is, instead of using the correct term.
This should not be a controversy, at least to people who value truth.
gravenimage says
The increasingly horrifying Bro. Ignatius Mary wrote:
You said:
“And yes–pedophile is a loaded term, if by that he means that decent people do indeed consider *raping prepubscent children to be a bad thing*.
The idea that calling those who are gang raping a child pedophiles is like calling an African-American the “N” word is *sickening calumny*.
The claim that we should be ashamed of ourselves for condemning the gang rape of a child is just grotesque. *Ugh*.”
————————
You see, this is what I mean. I did not say or suggest that we should not condemn the gang rape of a child. That IS NOT WHAT I SAID, and you know it.
…………………………
Bro. Ignatius Mary has said *nothing* critical of child rape here–he has just taken issue with our daring to refer to child rapists as pedophiles.
More:
“decent people do indeed consider *raping prepubscent children to be a bad thing*”
Yes, it is, but 12 year old are not prepubescent. It is equally horrify to rape 11-`14 year old or 15-19 year olds. NO ONE disputes that. NO ONE.
…………………………
Most 12-year-old children and indeed prepubescent.
And the idea that no one disputes the rape of children being horrifying is simply not true–these child rapists in this story are certainly not in agreement. How can Bro. Ignatius Mary pretend that they are?
In fact, the “Prophet” of Islam “married” a child of six, and began raping her at nine. Are we to believe that the perfect man of Islam considered this horrifying? What absolute tosh.
More:
My post was about journalistic integrity. In journalism, a reporter is suppose to be accurate. That means using the correct term and not a sensational term to sell papers.
…………………………
There is nothing sensational in reporting the rape of a 12-year-old child as pedophilia.
It seems that that Bro. Ignatius Mary does not want us to consider this sensational. But no–no one should have to consider this to be normal.
More:
The mis-uxe (sic) of the term pedophile is incendiary because it garners up the hatred of people. It is like “fighting words” or a man riling up a crowd to riot. It the term fits, then use it, if the term is inaccurate, then use the correct term. That is what reporters are suppose to dp (sic).
…………………………
Of course this fits–here is Psychology Today:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/conditions/pedophilia
Is Bro. Ignatius Mary saying that Psychology Today is misusing the term pedophilia?
The American Psychiatric Association also categorizes pedophilia as sex with a child under the age of 13. Really, this is the norm among psychiatric bodies. Why is Bro. Ignatius Mary pretending it is not?
God only knows how young the victim would have to be for him to consider this pedophilia.
More:
The comparison to using the wrong term here with the “n” word is accurate. It is the use of a incendiary word, which the “n” is, instead of using the correct term.
…………………………
No–properly using the term pedophile for a child rapist has *nothing* in common with racial slurs. What utter calumny.
More:
This should not be a controversy, at least to people who value truth.
…………………………
The truth is that The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) also defines pedophilia as the sexual abuse of children under the age of 13.
Bro. Ignatius Mary seems *very* invested in our not considering the rape of this child to be pedophilia. *Very* disturbing.
Peter WF says
The police have lost their values to the mohammedans.
They apply to law selectively. Don’t dare insult the the mohammedans.
How can you let a group in society prey on the community’s young?
Is it a case of – if its not your children its OK? Appalling.
As usual the spell checker wants me to capitalize the inbred Bastards.
Dawne says
The police were extremely slow to act in this case, but did eventually bring a case against the criminals. It was the JURY who found the others innocent. In the UK juries are made up of people living fairly locally and it seems extremely likely either that pressure was brought to bear on them or they were afraid of repercussions if they found the Moslems guilty of these crimes. It’s very significant that it was only the Sikh who was found guilty.
Jean says
Dawne.
People living locally?
Why don’t you consider the possibility that those who condemned only the Sikh did so because they were themselves Muslims?
StellaSaidSo says
Jean, juries are made up of local people, and it is highly likely that these individuals were leaned on, as their identities would have been known locally. A jury consisting entirely of Muslims is most unlikely.
Joe says
The phrase, “Home of the brave”, doesn’t apply to them.
kouldb says
Every judge, magistrate, cop, counselor, politician & the media should be tried alongside of these vermin. Then locked up for life. They all have blood on their hands.
Max says
The “authorities” look for a minimum common denominator when prosecuting these Muslim animals, so that they don’t embarrass the religion of peace. Merkel has never been as unpopular as she is now for converting the EU into a radical Muslim paradise.
mortimer says
‘Islamophobia’ is a way to stop people from seeing the gross errors, misogyny and prejudice directed by Muslims against the naïve, dirty kufaar, whom Muslims hate ‘for the sake of Allah’.
‘Islamophobia’ is a way of saying kafirs are guilty without a trial or a proper hearing of the case. That is why it is often pronounced with such smug triumphalism. Smug Leftards and Muslims who use the term want to escape from the burden of having to prove whether their accusation of bigotry is valid or not. Whoever protests the term is taken by the denial to be guilty. Most Leftards today are unable to form an argument, so they use slanderous frankenwords and slogans that prove nothing … emotional reasoning is not reasoning.
The ‘Islamophobia’ strawman fallacy is like the medieval witch test: if the alleged witch was thrown bound into a pond and floated, she was guilty, but if she sank and drowned, then she was innocent. Either way, the witch died. That’s the technique modern Leftards are using to stop debate about Islamic jihad, supremacism and Islamic misogyny. They’ve found a way to throw the ideological opposition down the well without a hearing.
Brian hoff says
Your errer is you lump all muslim onto one group that support sex with underage children that not the case at all 99.99 $ of the muslim in the world are against it. That what I mean by there is no easy answer. The people who do this divide the noman public against itself. That story of the founder of Islam marrying one of his wife when she was 5 year old is base on very weak evidence.
gravenimage says
“Brian hoff”–really, “DefenderofIslam”–wrote:
Your errer is you lump all muslim onto one group that support sex with underage children that not the case at all 99.99 $ of the muslim in the world are against it.
……………………………..
Child marriage is the norm in many parts of the world, and it is Muslim clerics who regularly resist attempts to raise the marriage age:
Here are just a couple of stories:
“Saudi Arabia: Muslim clerics fighting attempts to end child marriage”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/09/saudi-arabia-muslim-clerics-fighting-attempts-to-end-child-marriage
“Ghana: Muslim cleric held for helping force 12-year-old girl into marriage”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/09/ghana-muslim-cleric-held-for-helping-force-12-year-old-girl-into-marriage
There are, of course, hundreds more.
More:
That what I mean by there is no easy answer. The people who do this divide the noman public against itself.
……………………………..
Yes, there is. Child rape *is wrong*. That is an easy answer–this is not a nuanced issue, as the vile “DefenderofIslam” pretends.
And the only members of the public who are divided on this are pedophiles, including Muslim child rapists.
More:
That story of the founder of Islam marrying one of his wife when she was 5 year old is base on very weak evidence.
……………………………..
Well, *this* is a straw many argument, since no one has ever said that Muhammed married poor little Aisha when she was five.
But the Sahih Hadith say that he married her when she was six, and began raping her at nine:
Narrated ‘Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).
–Sahih al-Bukhari Book 62 Hadith 64
Sahih means “reliable”, and is the highest ranking of Hadith reliability.
That so many Muslim clerics preach child marriage on just this basis proves that they consider this true.
gravenimage says
I meant to say “many parts of the Muslim world”.
Malcolm Jackson says
Nigel Farage publishes all his Radio shows on You Tube. If you want to make a comment on Nigel’s dislike of Tommy Robinson,and Nigel’s support of Islam, then go along to Nigel’s You Tube Page and post away. I am sure Nigel will love to read our comments. Happy days.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud0-IMJ9pU8&t=842s
IanB says
“All I want is justice, because the men who raped me are walking around scot free. I am terrified they’re doing what they did to me to other innocent young girls in Telford.”
When a justice system so severely lets down the children of its country it deserves to have its job properly done by the people. Depending on justice from a mythical “God” won’t do it.
A team of well equipped ex-SAS men would provide the solution to these vile creatures still walking the streets of Telford. This is what terrifies the UK Government.
StellaSaidSo says
Well said, IanB. And indeed the UK govt should be fearful. If they dare to lock up Tommy Robinson, they had better put extra locks on their own doors.
IanB says
Yes Stella, it’s deplorable that these muslim Pakistani gang rapist pigs escaped justice and Tommy was imprisoned for publicising the scandal.
Bro. Ignatius Mary says
That is what a prejudiced person would say who has no respect for the truth, who prefers to use the term that is a lie over the term that is the truth.
Pedophile is a loaded word that when applied to those who are not pedophiles has the same effect as racial bigots calling blacks the “n” word. It is incendiary.
No person of reason and integrity would use an incendiary word instead of the correct word. People who do so are no better than the Muslims who call us “the great Satan.” Shame on you.
gravenimage says
Wait–Bro. Ignatius Mary believes that it is “prejudiced” to characterize those gang raping a 12-year-old as pedophiles?
A 12-year-old is a *child* by any civilized yardstick–*that* is the truth.
And yes–pedophile is a loaded term, if by that he means that decent people do indeed consider *raping prepubscent children to be a bad thing*.
The idea that calling those who are gang raping a child pedophiles is like calling an African-American the “N” word is *sickening calumny*.
The claim that we should be ashamed of ourselves for condemning the gang rape of a child is just grotesque. *Ugh*.
IanB says
II don’t know who first said this but I’m saying it now:
A country that cannot protect its children is lost.
Bro, Ignatius Mary says
Just a quick note about accuracy in journalism. A pedophile is a person who prefers pre-pubescient children. Those who prefer young teenagers are Hebephiles, defined as individuals with a primary or exclusive sexual interest in 11- to 14-year-old pubescents. Ephebophiles, which is not considered pathological, are those with primary interest in 15-19 year olds.
It is important for media to use the correct terminology, as pedophile has a sensational aspect to it when in fact the person is not a pedophile.
StellaSaidSo says
Sub-categories are more relevant to therapists than to the law. Most people understand the term ‘paedophile’ to mean anyone who preys on children for sexual purposes. What word would YOU suggest?
Bro. Ignatius Mary says
These are not “sub-categories; they are different categories. Pedophilia is not used in law unless it conforms to the DSM definition.
The term pedophile as a blanket term was popularized by the media to make stories more sensationalize as most people think of pedophiles to be molesters of little children. I know this for a fact, since I had a conversation with a reporter form the Chicago Sun-Times, who admitted she knew the differences in the designations.
It is just as easy to use the proper word than an improper world that actually lies about the issue. Hebephile is the proper word for those who prefer or have primary interest in 11-14 year olds.
And technically, a rapist of a 12 year old is not any kind of “phile” unless the rapists prefers or has primary interest in that age group. Otherwise they are just rapists. I do not know whether these Muslims prefer or have primary interest in this age group, or if they are just a roving band of monsters out to rape anyone, including 12 year olds.
StellaSaidSo says
‘It is just as easy’ to call them all paedophiles. Who cares what their ‘primary interest’ is? Any adult who preys on children deserves to be locked up. Along with anyone who makes excuses for them.
gravenimage says
12-year-olds are prepubescent *children*.
And no–a child rapist does not have to exclusively victimize children in order to be a pedophile–*any* child rapist is a pedophile.
Some are exclusively sexually attracted to children, but many victimize any vulnerable targets. All of these “grooming gangs” target children.
Let’s hope that “Bro. Ignatius Mary” is not what he pretends to be–a Priest who is defending child rape.
There is actually a very well-known Priest with a blog with just this name. I doubt this is him–while I may not agree with him on all points, I have *never* seen him defending child rapists.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Stella.
IslamDownpressesHumanity says
It would be disgusting to think only one non-moslem was prosecuted for raping this poor girl but I’d imagine it’s completely consistent with islamic “justice”