Justice Peter Johnson “said the letters also gave an insight into the 22-year-old’s lack of rehabilitation and de-radicalisation. ‘He seems to have shut the door to the path.'”
What Johnson should ponder is why exactly Atai would “shut the door” to “deradicalization.” If he did, he would find abundant incitement to violence in the Qur’an and Sunnah. But Johnson, like virtually all authorities in non-Muslim countries, doesn’t want to think about that.
“‘I ask Allah to grant victory to the believers’: Islamic terrorist who helped assassinate police staffer Curtis Cheng withdraws his ‘bulls***’ apology and says he ISN’T sorry,” by Alex Chapman, Daily Mail Australia, November 15, 2018 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
An Islamic State terrorist convicted of the shooting murder of a police staffer has withdrawn his ‘bulls***’ apology to the victim’s widow, a court has heard.
Milad Atai was convicted for aiding in the 2015 shooting of Curtis Cheng, a New South Wales Police accountant.
During the conviction hearing, he told Cheng’s widow, Selina Cheng, he was sorry for the hurt he had put her and her family through.
But on Thursday, the NSW Supreme Court was told he had written letters to the federal police and a crowd prosecutor saying the apologies made in September weren’t honest.
‘I take back what I said in the box because I was in the heat of moment and I just slipped up,’ a letter to the federal police read.
‘If use (sic) can please let the judge know about this letter and I want him to know where I stand with this remorse bulls***.’
Justice Peter Johnson said Atai had previously said: ‘I am sorry for what I did and what I put her through… I take responsibility for my actions.’
But in court, Atai refuted the apology, saying: ‘I ask Allah to grant victory to the believers and to destroy those who oppress his slaves.’
Mr Johnson said the letters also gave an insight into the 22-year-old’s lack of rehabilitation and de-radicalisation.
‘He seems to have shut the door to the path,’ he said.
He asked Atai’s soliticer, Greg Smith, whether Atai was saying he maintains ‘radical, Salafist, murderous views’ to which the lawyer replied: ‘With due respect I think you’re reading too much into that.’…
Smith has a great career ahead of him in stand-up comedy.
Andy says
Again, This story shows that ISLAM should NOT BE IN ANY JUDEO-CHRISTIAN CIVILIZED NATION!
Lesley Ward says
Absolutely, but until all our politicians, Police hierarchy and Judiciary are forced into learning the truth about Islam, the Quran, hadith, sunnah etc they will go on living in ignorance and bringing death and destruction to the Australian people.
Obbop says
The West is full of traitor filth. Military tribunals are needed to send the military to round up those traitors and force them to appear for trial. If guilty I hope that lengthy terms at hard labor are given to send a message to other Westerners of what awaits them if they assist the invasion of the West.
Roger woodhouse says
Our politicians and governments are blatantly refusing to accept that Islam is the threat that the whole of the Western world face.By doing so the put at risk thousands of innocent lives.They blindly carry on as if its an inevitability that Islam will one day dominate our and future generations lives.They will all be removed from office long before that happens.
Roger woodhouse says
Test
tim gallagher says
Andy, I’d just like to add that Islam should not be allowed into any non-Muslim country, not just into Judeo-Christian countries. Often I’ve read here at Jihad Watch that the evil Muslims slaughtered 80 million Hindus in India. Buddhist countries shouldn’t put up with Muslims either. Burma seems to be doing the right thing in kicking Muslims out. No-one should put up with Islam. I completely agree with the comments of Lesley, Obbop and Roger. When will our political leaders wake up and get the courage to end all Muslim migration? Then again, so many of our general populations still haven’t woken up and demanded an end to Muslim migration.
mortimer says
The only ‘de-radicalization’ that will be effective is called the ‘REVISIONIST THEORY’ of early Islam. This theory argues from the lack of evidence for Islamic texts or references to a religion practiced by the Arab invaders of Syria, Iraq, Iran and North Africa. The holy books of Islam only appear gradually from 60 to 150 years following the death of the desert messenger who does not even have a biography until 250 years after his decease.
When the archeological evidence regarding the FOUR DIFFERENT QIBLAS is added to the REVISIONIST THEORY, there is a devastating conclusion that the early Islamic texts were fabricated long after the events described in them and in order to provide an explanation for the sudden conquest of ignorant, backward desert tribesmen.
The fabricated, invented nature of Islam and the self-referential incoherence of the PRIMARY TEXTS of Islam, and the opportunistic, amoral ethics of Islam, show that is purely of human origin … very primitive, unscientific and ignorant humans from one of the most isolated places … the empty deserts of Arabia.
gravenimage says
This has never led Muslims to leave Islam en masse before, I’m afraid.
Roger woodhouse says
Our politicians and governments are blatantly refusing to accept that Islam is the threat that the whole of the Western world face.By doing so the put at risk thousands of innocent lives.They blindly carry on as if its an inevitability that Islam will one day dominate our and future generations lives.They will all be removed from office long before that happens.
Joe says
Most of the parts of Islam that we don’t like were started in the tenth century by a ruler who wanted to assimilate his empire. He was trying to follow in the footsteps of Constantine and Charlemagne who used Catholicism as an assimilation tool. This ruler destroyed about 700,000 Korans and issued a new one.
Fragments of the Koran date back before Christ, and several intact Korans date to the 3rd and 4th centuries. The old Korans are a mixture of quotes from many sources. Some of these quotes made it into the 10th century Koran.
Petra was their holy city. The rock Mosque that is now in Mecca, used to be in Petra.
gravenimage says
Joe wrote:
Most of the parts of Islam that we don’t like were started in the tenth century by a ruler who wanted to assimilate his empire.
…………………….
What ruler might that have been? By the 10th century, brutal Muslim conquerors had already invaded and taken over all of Arabia, the Levant, north Africa, Spain, parts of southern France and southern Italy, Sicily, Mesopotamia, Persia, and parts of India.
How is any of *that* a good thing?
More:
He was trying to follow in the footsteps of Constantine and Charlemagne who used Catholicism as an assimilation tool. This ruler destroyed about 700,000 Korans and issued a new one.
…………………….
Again, why don’t you name this ruler? In reality, there is no historic evidence that the Qur’an changed radically in the 10th century.
And pretending that this ruler ignored the vicious model of the “Prophet” Muhammed and instead was aping Constantine and Charlemagne is absurd.
In fact, Charlemagne fought Muslims in Spain.
More:
Fragments of the Koran date back before Christ, and several intact Korans date to the 3rd and 4th centuries. The old Korans are a mixture of quotes from many sources. Some of these quotes made it into the 10th century Koran.
…………………….
Citations, please.
More:
Petra was their holy city. The rock Mosque that is now in Mecca, used to be in Petra.
…………………….
Is “rock Mosque” a reference to the Ka’aba? While there has been some speculation that the Qibla may have originally faced Petra (mostly from amateur historian Dan Gibson)–which I don’t find all that compelling an argument, but never mind–I have *never* seen a claim that the Ka’aba was originally in Petra, then moved to Mecca.
Another problem with this claim is that Petra was part of the Byzantine Empire until after the “Prophet” Muhammed’s death.
mortimer says
Atai’s retraction seems sincere: “I ask Allah to grant victory to the believers and to destroy those who oppress his slaves.”
He is obviously a Salafist. Salafism strongly promotes two ESSENTIAL DOCTRINES of Islam:
1) Jihadism – the teaching that jihad is the most important action of Muslims
2) Al Walaa wal Baraa – the teaching that Muslims must HATE the DIRTY KUFAAR ‘for the sake of Allah’.
gravenimage says
This, sadly, applies to all of Islam, and not just Salafis.
Bev says
Same-old, same-old…
It’s a truly bizarre religion spawned of the devil himself. C.S. Lewis would have much fodder here for his Screwtape Letters !
It becomes increasingly difficult for me to trust those who follow the prophet…
Thank you Robert fur all you input.
SB says
To the point: brain washed twit.
simpleton1 says
It looks like the moderates got to him
Without “moderates” the extremists would not get away with it,
and without extremists the moderates would not be supremacist ,“the protected species” doing stealth jihad for all muslim rights.
gravenimage says
Australia: Jihad murderer withdraws his apology, says “I ask Allah to grant victory to the believers”
……………………..
He calls it “this remorse bulls***”. This should surprise no one.
God, I hate Islam.
infidel says
SURPRISE SURPRISE !! That being aside, None of these news ever make it to the MSM in India…This suppression of news is NOTHING SHORT OF CRIMINAL… Thanks to JW and we know how this vile creature is remorseless for his innocent victims. At least this sick creature was truthful about the REAL FACE of his violent faith..
Kilauea says
If the Aussies had a pair they would deal with this threat themselves and not wait for the government to turn a blind eye.
FYI says
No remorse
No penitence
No respect or LOVE for God or man,only for his fake god allah “the best of deceivers” k3:54
No obedience to God’s Exodus 20 commandments
Any Jew or Christian,being in the same Biblical fold,understands that there is no possiblility of mercy or salvation for the unrepentant,for those who happily break God’s Exodus 20-enumerated laws.
God does not reward evil.
Yet we see in islam,that allah’s followers believe some paradise awaits them for the evil they do!
allah rewards evil:but since he is “the best of deceivers” k3:54,it should be pretty obvious that allah is NOT the True Biblical God:allah is a counterfeit god.In fact allah is to goliath what God is to David:the fake versus the Real Deal.