And what he did isn’t a crime under Sharia, so he will have no trouble in Pakistan (which is a Sharia state for all intents and purposes, although Muslim hardliners there insist there is more Sharia to be applied) over this incident.
One survivor of a Muslim rape gang in the UK said that her rapists would quote Quran to her, and believed their actions justified by Islam.
The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
“Calgary cab driver convicted of sexual assault fails to show for sentencing,” by Dave Dormer, CBC News, November 19, 2018 (thanks to Blazing Cat Fur):
A Canada-wide warrant has been issued for a Calgary cab driver who failed for show for sentencing after being convicted of sexual assault on a passed-out fare.
Muhammad Nadeem Irshad, 37, was convicted June 25 and was due in court Friday for sentencing….
Irshad was convicted of sexual assault after forcing a passed-out fare to perform oral sex on him in the back of his cab in 2014.
The woman — whose identity is protected by a publication ban — had been picked up after partying downtown during Stampede week.
The victim, in her 20s at the time of the assault, memorized Irshad’s licence plate and called police after she woke up to being assaulted in the back of the taxi….
The licence plate was a match to the cab driven by Irshad.
Travelled to PakistanLast month, Irshad was supposed to appear in court for a sentencing hearing. At that time, prosecutor Melissa Bond and defence lawyer David Chow appeared before Justice Michele Hollins and indicated that not only had Irshad missed a pre-sentence psychiatric assessment appointment, he had also travelled to Pakistan to visit family….
Andy says
The history is clear, simple and direct: Without exception, Muslims destroy every nation/culture in which they infiltrate…WITHOUT EXCEPTION!
Rob Harris says
Why wasn’t his passport taken off him?
Mirren10 says
First question I asked myself. The West is becoming more and more suicidally *stupid*.
Mirren10 says
And if the creep oozes back, claiming ‘asyslum’, or ‘refugee’ status, no doubt Trudeau’s Canada will happily let this pig back in.
Terry Gain says
The better question is why was he not incarcerated pending sentencing.
BC says
Why? why? why? In a sensible world that would be the case, any sensible judge would know he was a flight risk but in the diverse world some little piggies are more equal than others. No doubt the defence argued that it would be prejudicial.
Roger woodhouse says
No surprises there.He will probably be back in a couple of years to continue working as a taxi driver.It seems the Canadian judiciary is as stupid as Britains.
mortimer says
There is no punishment in Sharia law for the rape by a Muslim of a kafir.
Muhammad Nadeem Irshad only did what in the last 1400 years millions of Muslim men have done, namely, to rape and humiliate a KAFIR. Perhaps he did this before and got away with it. Perhaps he feared a number of women would come out of the woodwork to accuse him, thus reducing his credibility.
Sharia law does nothing to punish the rape of a kafir. Kafirs have no rights under Sharia law… they have privileges which may or may not be enforced depending on the good will of the Muslim ruler. At any rate, how is a kafir going to get a lawyer to take the case in a Muslim country. Islamist vigilantes will simply utter death threats to the lawyer or slash his car tires or fire-bomb his home or law office. Muslim judges do not want to rule in cases involving a kafir either. They will dismiss the case, rather than risk being seen as a traitor to Islam.
Muhammad Nadeem Irshad knows he will be safe from prosecution in Pakistan, the home of the greatest national pornography consumption on earth. Pornistan is welcome to take all rapists like Muhammad Nadeem Irshad.
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Mortimer.
Angemon says
And he wasn’t considered in risk of flight, with the subsequent arrest of his pasport? SMH…
Mirren10 says
Indeed. I missed that bit.
gravenimage says
Good question, Angemon.
Older Canadian says
In Canada this is not surprising. Our justice system has become very progressive, and will twist themselves into a pretzel to not offend a criminal, show compassion, understanding of circumstances, and all that rot. And amost judges believe that a criminal will be honourable enough to come back to be sentenced if they say they will.
Chris says
Mohammed did it – it is thus completely OK in Shariah… (not a criminal act). And this is why Shariah is absolutely at odds with human rights…whatever crimes ( and there were many) committed by Mohammed, in human rights terms, are NOT CRIMES, according to Shariah.
Logic&Reason says
Here’s a speedy psychiatric assessment in such a case.
“How devout is the perpetrator?”
Beliefs foster actions. But the left-propagandist media won’t look under the prayer rug. They need the Muslim vote….to our (and eventually THEIR) peril.
Farrakhan is Left-approved. And look how they went after Kavanaugh for allegations dating back 35 years…but completely ignore the recent claims regarding Keith Ellison.
gravenimage says
Canada: Muslim cab driver convicted of sexual assault absconds to Pakistan before sentencing
…………………..
Why was he allowed to leave the country?
And Pakistan–Islamic “land of the pure–isn’t going to extradite him for raping an Infidel.
unbeliever1 says
He probably came to Canada as a refugee and was given permanent status because he had to flee Pakistan for fear of being killed.
Read a story today that shows how far judges in Canada will go in giving light sentences refugees to prevent deportations. Crimes for which Canadian citizens would spend years in prison for. In this case, this refugee rammed a cop car and fled. Upon being given a light sentence, he threated to kill the cop who arrested him. Since being released on probation he has been arrested for committing other crimes.
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/judge-gave-excessively-light-sentence-to-avert-deportation-of-refugee-who-threatened-to-kill-police-appeal-court
Older Canadian says
Yes most judges are doing it. With a horrid escalating crime rate especially in Ontario and B.C. you would think they would rethink their past decisions. Manitory sentences was implemented by the conservative government, but was one of the first things erased when the liberals took power. Crime shortly after started to take off.
infidel says
Another Islamic TRUISM from the annals of the infidel:
For any Muslim, esp Muslim men, free infidel societies are FERTILE PLAYGROUNDS to act out their most depraved sexual fantasies on infidel women, which their book gives full religious and moral license. Actually, most of these vile creatures migrate more for these kinds of depravity than for jobs and work. And the free liberal welfare does not hurt either..
Hubert Wagner says
Given how our Leftist cultures work at the moment, appeasement of Islam and light treatment of Muslim offenders, I’d say this incident is an example of judicial incompetence.
However, somewhere in the depths of the Department of Justice there may exist a spark of common sense. Why lock this undesirable up for years at tax payers expense?
Here is a much better way to counter Trudeau’s habit of importing Islamic savages. Let it be widely known someone convicted of rape faces a long, long prison sentence, then release the convicted, without any supervision, to await sentencing. Result? We save hundreds of thousand of dollars and get rid of savages, permanently.
Paul says
We had a case in England a few years back. He’d gone up to the tribal hill area never to be found.
But he was. The police here were determined. Once found it took two years to extradite him.
I just hope the Canadians are as determined and willing to do the legwork in Pakistan.
Paul
Prabh says
I not utilize the term “Partial genocidal assault” for the term “s*xual assault” because the word “s*xual seems to somewhat imply some sort of pleasure – (fact that word sexy is considered compliment by usa(not india!) is proof of this assertion that there is pleasure implied) though word “sex” refers to whether one is a boy or girl, man or woman. Gender is grammar term. Most languages have designated all nouns to be either masculine or feminine or neuter/neutral etc.
-Words Genius, Genocide, Genitalia all have similar origins (to beget, ancestral origins) – there is no pleasure whatsoever in any sort of assault whether verbal, physical or genocidal – the intent is to humiliate and diminish capacity to enjoy and romantic pleasure in the present or future – so I now refer to “se*ual assaults” as “genocidal assaults”. Humiliation of the one attacked, humiliation of family of one attacked and humiliation of romantic partner. These are genocidal attacks that interfere with principles of purity-telegony etc. The next generation suffers – and this is good for islam for they seem to make us EXTINCT. Understand islamojihadists wish for us nonmuslims to be EXTINCT. We won’t even be in museums because the islamics do not value art or museums – islamics demolish museums and temples! Temple is feminine structure – muslims do not value the Goddess/Devi or the Sacred Divine Feminine of Prakriti-Shakti etc.
The four letter word so casually tossed around by dialectical materialistic demons, “rape” ought to be referred to as “Full Genocidal Attack” and punished accordingly.
I have own ideas on etymology of three letter word starting with “s” and ending in “x” with middle letter being “e” – I will not discuss my theory on this word online, at least not right now.
Point being: no tolerance for genocidal attacks.
Prabh108 (kindly excuse typos or any other errors please.)
Prabh says
second word in above comment at 2:45 pm comment Nov. 21, 2018 is supposed to be “Now”
Prabh
Prabh says
second word in lengthy comment above is “Now”
Prabh
Prabh says
Line eleven correction: “to enjoy any” not “to enjoy and” – see the difference one word makes – I repeat I now think of “se*ual assault” as “Genocidal Assaults”.
Line 16 – they seem to want to make us extinct” – actually it is not “seem” islamics wish all nonmuslims were extinct – and they have a racial pecking order too, with arabs on top of all other racial groups of course. (indo-pakmuslims are at the bottom – Get Ghar Wapsi losers and join the land of the living, Dharmic Aryavarta- Akhand Bharat.)
please excuse double posting above of correction – I aim to be more succinct and accurate with future comments.
Prabh