The abuse included gang rape, forcing the girls to perform various sex acts, the more degrading the better. They were made to watch other girls being raped. They loaned girls out to other men, sex slaves passed on from “Asian” man to “Asian” man. They were called “white slag” and “white c**t.” The exploitation could go on for months, even years. Photographs were taken of the girls performing sex acts, and they would be threatened that if they reported any of what had happened, those photographs would be sent far and wide, beginning with their parents. The girls would in some cases be doused with petrol and threatened with being set on fire. The “Asian” men would threaten to rape their mothers and younger sisters.
By 2015, Muslim groomers had been tried and convicted in London, Aylesbury, Banbury, Birmingham, Blackbury, Blackpool, Bradford, Bristol, Bolton, Chesham, Derby, Ipswich, Keighley, Leeds, Leicester, Manchester, Middlesbrough, Oldham, Oxford, Peterborough, Preston, Rochdale, Rotherham, Sheffield, Skipton, Slough, and Telford. How many more towns, since 2015, will have to be added to the list? In every case, in those 27 cities and towns, the grooming gangs consisted entirely of British Pakistanis — “Asians” — except for two North African Arabs who joined the Pakistanis in their gang-rapes in Oxford, and twelve Somalis in Bristol who ran their own sex ring with young girls.
“The Home Secretary should know better,” he [Sadiq Khan] said, adding that he believed either the Home Secretary was taking advice from people who want him to lead the Tory party on how to win support from the membership, “or he’s in some sort of arms race with his competitor Boris Johnson.” Both Khan and Javid are of Asian [Pakistani] heritage. Khan said that far-right groups could use Javid’s comments as evidence of the “myths they are perpetuating.” “As a consequence of some of these messages, of some of this language, I’m telling you, around the country ethnic minorities, particularly those of Asian origin, from the subcontinent, will be suffering more discrimination, will be at the end of more abuse because of this sort of language,” he added.
What “myths” are those “far-right” groups perpetuating? The “myth” that grooming gangs consist almost entirely of “Asians” (British-Pakistanis) who have been sexually abusing large numbers of English girls for years? That’s not a myth. That is what courts found to be the case in twenty-six cities in England so far. Only in Bristol were those convicted not Pakistanis, but Somalis. Why is bringing this to the attention of the pubic inadmissible? Shouldn’t the British public be kept fully informed of what has become one of the most horrific scandals in the history of the U.K. — the scandal of the grooming gangs themselves, and the scandal of the police dragging their feet on investigating these grooming gangs in order to avoid charges of “racism” and “islamophobia”? Don’t parents need to be able to tell their daughters about these grooming gangs, including the fact that they should be particularly wary of “Asian” men? Would such a warning be unforgivable “racism” in spreading a “myth” about “Asian grooming gangs,” as Sadiq Khan wants you to believe, or would it make perfect sense, as Sajid Javid believes?
Finally, aside from helping to warn families with young girls of whom, and what, to be wary — and shouldn’t they be warned? — what would discussion of the background of the grooming gangs usefully contribute? It might lead to a recognition that the contempt displayed by these particular Muslims for their victims is inculcated by the Qur’an itself. That book describes Infidels as “the most vile of created beings”(98:6), warns Muslims not to take Christians or Jews as friends, “for they are friends only with each other” (5:51), and commands them, in 109 Qur’anic verses, to conduct violent Jihad against Infidels. The contempt these men felt for the girls they called “white slag” did not come out of nowhere. Its roots are in Islam.
How would that understanding help? It might make the decent Muslims, like Savid Javid himself, want to publicly distance themselves from such attitudes that, some may be willing to admit, are encouraged by verses in the Qur’an. Some might want to go further, and discuss ways to “contextualize” certain Qur’anic verses. Many people, Muslim and non-Muslim, might even wish to consider the proposal made in an open letter earlier this year by nearly 300 French intellectuals. Arguing that the Quran incites violence, the letter insisted that “the verses of the Quran calling for murder and punishment of Jews, Christians, and nonbelievers be struck to obsolescence by religious authorities,” so that “no believer can refer to a sacred text to commit a crime.” “Struck to obsolescence” means to declare those verses as no longer valid, to consider them “obsolete.” These are the verses that have created the atmospherics of contempt and hatred that help the grooming gangs to justify their behavior: the girls deserve it, they’re asking for it, they are sluttish and “vile” Unbelievers.
Sadiq Khan does not see why reports on grooming gangs need mention “Asians” at all, or — what he thinks was invented by Donald Trump — nonexistent “no-go zones.” For the Mayor of London, who may one day be a Labour candidate for Prime Minister, it’s pure happenstance that several dozen grooming gangs in 27 cities consisted almost entirely of British Pakistanis. It would serve no good purpose, but only be “racist,” to bring up their backgrounds at all, much less note their commonality.
Sajid Javid, Home Secretary, who may one day be a Conservative candidate for Prime Minister, it’s essential to describe the members of those grooming gangs as “Asians” — meaning “British Pakistanis.” (Still better, of course, would have been to describe them as “British-Pakistanis” rather than as “Asians,” though everyone in the U.K. knows what “Asian” signifies.) Only thus will Muslims be forced to recognize, and acknowledge, that there may be something about the texts and teachings of Islam that help explain the phenomenon of the “Asian” grooming gangs. In other words, let a real discussion about those gangs begin, however fraught, and nothing extenuate.
Savid Javid has my vote. What about yours?
Malcolm Jackson says
And Nigel Farage thinks Tommy Robinson should be in prison for reporting on Muslim rape gangs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j5uySpDo20
Fatts says
Typical lukewarm Farage. This man is too fearful to ever be a leader.
Dawne says
I think that Farage is trying to play a long game. The media/establishment has already marked Tommy Robinson out as a “far-right extremist” which a lot of people who don’t bother to educate themselves and believe the lies they’re told, believe. So I think he thinks that if he supports Tommy he will himself lose credibility with a lot of ordinary voters and that for long term support it’s better to position himself as “not far-right”
I think that Farage is wrong to go about it like this. He needs to be a voice telling people to take off their blinkers and wake up to what is going on in the UK today.
Tony Holland says
yes it is sad that he is now considered to be ‘soft’ on the islamic scandal and critical of those that wholeheartedly show support for the condemnation of these subhumans that are swilling around our towns and cities like a tide of scum contaminating everything they come into contact with,its sad because he is a hero and is the one person who brought about Brexit,no one else could or would have done what he achieved,they all jumped aboard after he started the bus rolling,I just hope that he is ‘keeping his powder dry’ for another day when he will erupt onto the political scene again,he’s a great orator.
Asally says
Except he HASN’T “brought Brexit”. The idiot won an election on Brexit and then promptly went on a permanent vacation, all but dissolving the party that he cobbled together to accomplish the task. Of course it resulted in failure. One thing no thinking “leader” would ever do is win a victory on paper and then go fishing. How stupid. Where did he learn politics? From a book? The man has thus far failed to accomplish anything. Now he goes about slamming a man who has committed no crime and has brought attention to a dire situation which has apparently been allowed to fester in the dark because “important” people in Britain are culpable in various ways. Disgusting. A lazy and timid little man. One should know this first: the last one to leave the meeting won the day. Those who take off when they’ve had enough are always losers.
Joe Scott says
Spot on Dawne ?
Peter McLoughlin says
Farage didn’t win the Brexit referendum. Surveys showed that Farage was a liability. He then kept a low profile during the referendum, leaving it to another organisation to campaign for Brexit.
The politicians and media now admit that Brexit was about immigration. This was obvious years before the referendum took place, but no-one would address the elephant in the room. A survey of UKIP voters showed that the EU was only the second most important issue to them. The most important issue for them was immigration.
At a recent talk Farage admitted he was a virtual unknown and would have remained so, if it hadn’t been for a video of his rudeness in the EU Parliament making him into a celebrity.
yoseliani says
Savid Javid a stealth jihadist. His purpose is to make the UK into a sharia ruled Islamic state. There is absolutely no doubt about this. If the British people continue to remain so passive and apathetic, their country will be a caliphate within 20-30 years
gravenimage says
Savid Javid has my vote. What about yours?
…………………….
I’m not sure–certainly, what he says here is better than the appalling Sadiq Khan.
But Tommy Robinson and many other brave British patriots have been persecuted under Javid’s aegis, which is nothing good. He seems at least as apt to go after Anti-Jihadists as Jihadists themselves.
Torquil Dick-Erikson says
When Tommy Robinson was moved from the relative safety of Hull prison to another prison (Onley) with a high percentage of jihadist inmates who were out to kill him, this was a Home Office decision.
Sajid Javid was Home Secretary at that time.
Did he approve – or even decide – this transfer, or was the decision taken without his knowledge and consent?
HE MUST BE ASKED THIS QUESTION!
If his answer is that he knew nothing about the decision, then he must seek out the official who was responsible, and punish him. Otherwise he himself must take responsibility.
The transfer was equivalent to a death sentence, which under Sharia law is the right sentence for someone like Tommy R.
Is Sharia law already being applied in Britain by British officials?
alex Reid says
I agree!
Bindon Blood says
The man took his parliamentary oath on a Koran, the same Koran that encourages Muslims to do what they do ,Jihad, child sexual relations, polygamy, hatred of Jews and lying and cunning against the infidel. The Koran that says that Jesus is not God,was not crucified and was not resurrected.
Walter Sieruk says
That Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan of London ,England is always lying in his attempted ,in his Islamic deception Taqiyya, to hide and cover-up the many evil of Islam.
To give two examples of this is that Sadiq by his lying means falsehoods and distraction to set-up an Islamic smokescreen to hide the reality of the brutal and vicious Muslim misogynists in England who ,in gangs,show their misogyny against girls and women in England by raping them. They also expose that they must be cowards by ganging up ,in groups to attack British girls. Those Muslim migrant gangs are also , be the vile and heinous actions are also showing the arrogant and hate -filled contempt for females , and for all people who are not Muslims, and the hate and vicious spite against Western laws and Western government and the whole of all Western civilization.
Nevertheless, Khan in his Islamic gall still tries to hide truth and reality about Islam and its hideous fruits from the public.
Another example of that lying Muslim mayor of London is about Islamic terror attacks in England , be the jihad murder attacks be in Manchester or London said “ For Khan said those terrorist attacks in London were performed by men [the terrorists] who were trying to justly their action by the religion I belong to …their ideology is a perversion [ of Islam ] and has no place in Islam” The Muslin mayor, Sadiq Khan, of the capital city of England further said that he is “Outraged at those who try to hide their evil with Islam.” He could be in a genuine mental state of denial about the violent and deadly of many of the parts of Islam or by contrast he might know and is attempting to cover up the truth about the violent essence of Islam. Likewise, the prime minster of England, Theresa May, when had made public statements about those violent and vicious terrorist attacks on London Bridge and nearby Borough Market. She had declared that heinous religious terror attack as the outcome of “an ideology that is a perversion of Islam,” That statement shows that she didn’t do her homework. For those jihadist Muslims were putting in the practice the instruction of real, actual, non-watered down hard core Islam. As the Quran in, for example, Surah 9:123 instructs “O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you…” Running over non-Muslims with a van and then stabbing them is a very effective way of showing people who are not Muslims harshness. Also Surah 9:111 teaches “The believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain, they kill and are killed…” The whole foundation for the ideology of Islamic terrorism is the theology of the Quran. As seen in those two, just sited, verses from the Quran and other verses well, such as, Surah 4:89. 5:33 47:4. Teresa May also denounced “Extremism.” This type of “Extremism” is based on the Quran.
Hugh Fitzgerald says
Just a bit more on Savid Javid: https://www.timesofisrael.com/meet-sajid-javid-uks-top-muslim-pro-israel-politician-who-just-may-become-pm/
commonsense says
Near the conclusion of the article, we learn that Javid is a non-practicing Muslim. I’d bet he actually knows little about the religion he was born into, and would be appalled to discover its intrinsic malevolence.
commonsense says
(Re: my comment, just posted)
Or perhaps Javid, in fact, knows full well that the religion he was born into is irredeemably malevolent, and, while not having formally renounced it, cannot bring himself to embrace it.
simpleton1 says
“Those are my principles, and if you don’t like them… well, I have others.” – Groucho Marx
Renounce or Embrace islam?
Principles of islamic laws, to be applied in due course, when principles allow.
This seems a well practiced way how muslim despots rule.
Just enough islam, to not be disposed by their own.
Bindon Blood says
ASI said above,he took his oath on the Koran. He could have affirmed.
gravenimage says
Hugh, I don’t want to see either one of these Mohammedans become prime minister of the UK.
They would likely make even the egregious Theresa May look good in comparison.
simpleton1 says
“His mother would take her sons to the library on a Saturday morning and tell them to read the books, as they weren’t going anywhere else.
“That’s what got me into reading,” the home secretary told one interviewer. “It probably wasn’t the most positive way to do it. But there you go.”
So has he read the koran or not?
Perhaps some hadith as well?
HIs actions may seem to be against islamic concepts.
Darura, which means “Necessity”.
Still a muslim, so a moderate, so an ember for islam is still there.
Others have simply become become ex-muslims and pay a price for that.
So when will that be? or is the reward for being muslim too great?
jewdog says
Why would Britain tolerate massive immigration from cultures which treat women like dirt? It’s not racism to point that out, but common sense. Maybe British culture is in decline.
David M says
Maybe because the world has gone mad.
Dennise says
Correct.!
gravenimage says
Hugh Fitzgerald: Sajid Javid’s Tweet Horrifies Sadiq Khan (Part Two)
…………………….
Of course, the Muslim mayor of London doesn’t want anyone to say anything negative about Muslims raping Infidels. Just appalling.
mortimer says
Sadiq Khan wants to distract people from the main motive of Islam HATRED DIRECTED TOWARDS THE KAFIR.
And Nero fiddled while Rome burned!
Anjuli Pandavar says
Arguing that the Quran incites violence, the letter insisted that “the verses of the Quran calling for murder and punishment of Jews, Christians, and nonbelievers be struck to obsolescence by religious authorities,”
—
…and the religious authorities’ response? “Go to Hell”
“Only thus will Muslims be forced to recognize, and acknowledge, that there may be something about the texts and teachings of Islam that help explain” [the Muslim rape gangs].
—
= apostasy.
I admire your writing. Please do not include this one in any anthology. It does not do you justice. You know from your own otherwise impressive writing that to be Muslim means either to have found a way of living with Islam and the Qur’an’s endless contradictions, or to simply not think about any of it at all. The conclusion is especially disappointing for its extraordinary naivety. Of course *nothing* will ever get Muslims to recognise that there is *anything* in the text and teaching that explain any of the violence, rape, killing, enslavement, etc., for which that text and teachings are rightly blamed. 1400 years of jihad terrorism couldn’t do it, 33981 acts of terror since 9/11 couldn’t do it; what euphemism is used to identify rape gangs is certainly not going to do it. Whether Sajid Javid, Sadiq Khan, Maajid Nawaz or imam Tawhidi, none of them will ever link any of this back to the Qur’an. They will blame anyone and anything, they will obfuscate, waffle, lie, BS, umm-aah, anything, as long as none of this gets back to the Qur’an. ISIS is way ahead of you on this one. It understands what’s in Muslims’ hearts.
mortimer says
The Koran’s 164 Jihad Verses: K 002:178-179, 190-191, 193-194, 216-218, 244; 003:121-126, 140-143, 146, 152-158, 165-167,169, 172-173, 195; 004:071-072, 074-077, 084, 089-091, 094-095,100-104; 005:033, 035, 082; 008:001, 005, 007, 009-010, 012, 015-017, 039-048,057-060, 065-075; 009:005, 012-014, 016, 019-020, 024-026, 029,036, 038-039, 041, 044, 052, 073, 081, 083,086, 088, 092, 111, 120, 122-123; 016:110; 022:039, 058, 078; 024:053, 055; 025:052; 029:006, 069; 033:015, 018, 020, 023, 025-027, 050; 042:039; 047:004, 020, 035; 048:015-024; 049:015; 059:002, 005-008, 014; 060:009; 061:004, 011, 013; 063:004; 064:014; 066:009; 073:020; 076:008.
simpleton1 says
Please!
Sajid Javid is a softener for islam!
Do what is necessary to further islamic cause. :- Darura, which means “Necessity”.
Just a means of getting the “foot in the door” or “a camel’s head in the tent”
His decision to swear on and ask for the koran, which an unbeliever is not allowed to touch and this practiced in the UK parliament.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hn8LMTQ8k70.
“It is an islamic belief that Christians and Jews believe in the same God.”
This article raises many questions, such as the muslim names of his children.
Why does he attend muslim award ceremonies?
Read this article and weep!
https://jastatham.com/2018/05/02/sajid-javid-sworn-into-parliament-by-quran/
gravenimage says
Thanks for pointing out his taking the oath of office on a Qur’an.
mortimer says
YIKES !!! The Koran PROMOTESTAQIYYA !!!
FYI says
swear on the Bible:a book that contains God’s Official Exodus 20 Laws including the commandment that says “Thou shalt NOT bear FALSE WITNESS”
swear on the koran:a book that DISAGREES with God’s Exodus 20 laws and has no problem with bearing false witness k3:28
The book of “allah,the best of deceiver’s” k3:54.To swear by the koran is to swear by allah the deceiver!That’s NOT the God of the Bible.
kouldb says
“Sajid Javid, Home Secretary, who may one day be a Conservative candidate for Prime Minister”: BEWARE Britain! Sadiq Khan pretended to be a moderate & modern Muslim too. Until he was elected Mayor. After which his wife started wearing the burka, he banned ads of women in train stations & was responsible for the allocation of an entire team of police officers to monitoring social media for potentially offensive comments about Islam. Thereby ushering in blasphemy laws. He’s allowed Speakers Corner to become an Islamic hate haven. Where non-Muslims are simply not safe. Censorship & the gratuitous arrests of even disabled women for simply reminding police that praying isn’t allowed in parks. Whilst you now have Sharia compliant banking & financial systems. Sharia courts & entire suburbs complaint with Sharia laws. Including your streets. It’s time to put the drink & drugs away. Time to focus on more than the football. Protect your families. And do not. EVER. Vote for Javid or you’ll get the government you deserve. And may God bless & protect you all in the dark years ahead.
mortimer says
Thanks, Hugh, for this important article. Your question is the right one: “The contempt these men felt for the girls they called “white slag” did not come out of nowhere.”
You have PINPOINTED THE PROBLEM, namely, that none of our leaders have TROUBLED THEMSELVES to learn the KEY MOTIVE OF MUSLIMS … HATRED of the KAFIR.
Allah hates the KAFIR and ‘good’ Muslims should hate them too. THIS DOCTRINE is called AL WALAA WAL BARAA (allegiance to Islam and ‘CLEANSING’ from the filthy KAFIRS).
Anyone who does not understand AL WALAA WAL BARAA does not truly understand the MOTIVE of Islam.
WorkingClassPost says
I’m with Hugh on this.
Whatever Javid has or hasn’t said, he has at least spoken as if he might be prepared to look for the truth, which is a huge step forward here in UK.
British establishment fears make it almost impossible for a non-muslim to speak about anything to do with islam, and it took a muslim prosecutor, Nazir Afzal, to bring an action in the Rochdale rape gang case:-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_child_sex_abuse_ring
It may now take a muslim Home Secretary to do something similar in this wider context. He may, of course, just provide cover and distract from what we all know is happening, but that’s what is already the situation so even just the chance that he may be an honest person, is something worth holding onto.
In short, I am hopeful, but won’t be placing any bets.
Peter McLoughlin says
It’s nearly five years since “Easy Meat”, my exhaustive book on the subject of the grooming gangs, was first published. Robert Spencer (the Islamic expert banned from entering the UK) even wrote a summary of the book for the back cover.
There’s an entire chapter on why these grooming gangs were to be expected when Islam was imported. If Sajid Javid is an honest broker, he’d be inviting me to give my expert opinion on the subject. I’ve heard nothing.
Not one of the journalists or newspapers who received review copies have even mentioned the book.
alex Reid says
I believe that Home Secretary Javid is cut from the same cloth as Mayor Khan. He just uses a different approach. Khan is an out & out liar & denier re. the crimes carried out by Muslims. Can’t change the facts. Khan tried to make it out the British courts, somehow, stitched these guys up. Recently I caught a clip on youtube.com. These Birmingham Sikh men caught a London Muslim paedophile, who had travelled through to Birmingham, to have sexual liaisons with a 9year old Sikh girl. They had it on film, the documentary evidence etc. & handed him over to Police. This 31year old Muslim had passed himself off as a 19year old to her. The Muslims are carrying out a systemic attack on young Sikh girls right across the UK. Before Islam & Muslims really started to flood the West it was viewed as rather exotic Eastern Religion & way of Life. Now the TRUTH is out. It is in FACT a Fascistic, raping, thieving, murdering, paedophilic, misogynistic Desert Dogma. They hold their “Religious” Leaders in high esteem, but the outside world sees them as the spokespersons for an evil, vile political ideology. Time to eradicate it so Middle Easterners & other “Asians” can live in peace & dignity.
Peter McLoughlin says
I see that Hugh has pointed his readers to a broken link on my website (his link is missing a letter). So I have taken the trouble of providing that information here.
Here’s the most complete list of towns where successful prosecutions have taken place:
Accrington, Aylesbury, Banbury, Barking, Birmingham, Blackburn, Blackpool, Bradford, Bristol, Burton, Canterbury, Cardiff, Chesham, Colchester, Coventry, Derby, Dewsbury, Halifax, High, Huddersfield, Ipswich, Keighley, Leeds, Leicester, Littlehampton, Liverpool, London, Manchester, Middlesbrough, Nelson, Newcastle, Oldham, Oxford, Peterborough, Preston, Rochdale, Rotherham, Sheffield, Skipton, Slough, Telford, Yeovil.
There are other towns where I have had reliable reports of these gangs operating. Yet these towns have never once been publicly mentioned in connection to this crime-wave.