As part of the UN Migration Pact, signatories are required to “commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination” with measures including state promotion of “diversity”, prevention of “hate speech” and opening up of welfare systems to illegal immigrants, was written in such a way that it would create a legal framework.”
Sensible nations are rejecting the disastrous UN Migration Pact — the full name of which is the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration — a UN scheme to make the hijrah seem to be controlled and orderly, all the while stripping away the border controls of sovereign countries and putting them in the hands of the United Nations, which will also influence “diversity” measures and work to curtail free speech within Western nations under the pact.
Slovakia is now “the latest nation to follow U.S. President Donald Trump’s lead in withdrawing from the United Nations.” The Prime Minister of Slovakia, Peter Pellegrini, has called the Pact harmful and a dangerous security risk, warning that the document describes mass migration as “inevitable, necessary, and desirable” while failing to distinguish between legal and illegal migration.
Although there are arguments that the migration pact would not be legally binding, it is politically binding. It is presented in much the same deceptive manner that the Liberal Government of Canada presented the anti-blasphemy Motion M103, which was passed in Parliament. Its proponents argued that a motion is not a law, but motions provide the framework for possible future laws, as well as influence the interpretation of existing laws. Of course, M-103 further armed the already weaponized Canadian human rights commissions and tribunals, enabling them to terrorize and ruin the lives of citizens, as was recently shown in a Jihad Watch article: “Landlord loses appeal to overturn order to pay Muslims $12,000 for wearing shoes in their prayer room.” M-103 also resulted in followup action to systematically “monitor citizens for compliance” in a 23-million-dollar program — money stolen from Canadian taxpayers — that will supposedly help fight discrimination, including “Islamophobia.”
So while many continue to insist that the UN Pact on Migration is not legally binding, it is deemed to be politically binding, and sets up a “legal framework” that can be used to interpret the law. It is no irony that Canada plans to “lead the charge” on the UN Migration Pact.
The world is being divided into two camps: globalists and populists. Despite the name-calling by globalists against so-called “populists” — names including “racist,” “far right,” “xenophobic,” and “Islamophobic” — reasonable people of all races and creeds are starting to wake up to the Leftist-Islamic supremacist alliance, and to globalist leaders’ aim to fling open the doors of Western nations to the hijrah, with no concern for the safety of Western citizens or for their economic futures, even as many of them are nearing pension age. The plan is socialism, which will heap the burden of rising taxation upon the backs of the hardest-working taxpayers. The riots that are now exploding in France over fuel prices are just the tip of the iceberg as more and more people begin to feel the economic pinch. Where do citizens who support globalism think the money is going to come from to support a multitude of migrants from mostly anti-Western countries, all too many of whom have no interest in working? Globalist Sweden is already preparing to raise its retirement age to accommodate “migrant-driven population growth.”.
It has just been revealed that globalist Angela Merkel’s government “deceived the public… as internal documents from the Federal Foreign Office reveal that Angela Merkel’s government has been the main architect of the controversial UN migrant pact.” The co-leader of Germany’s “populist” AfD party, Alexander Gauland, has vowed: “We will do everything we can to avert this disaster in the making.” Merkel is stepping down soon, as her party is deeply divided over Germany’s handling of migration. It has also come to light in France that the “globalist poster boy” Emmanuel Macron‘s polls have just plunged to “historic lows,” while populist Marine Le Pen has climbed in the polls above Macron.
So far, the US, Slovakia Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, Austria, Bulgaria, Switzerland, Australia and Israel have all rejected the UN Pact on migration.
“Slovakia Is Latest EU Nation to Follow Trump’s U.S. Out Of ‘Harmful, Dangerous’ UN Migration Pact,” by Virginia Hale, Breitbart, November 26, 2018:
Slovakia is to be the latest nation to follow U.S. President Donald Trump’s lead in withdrawing from the United Nations (UN) migration compact, its prime minister has announced.
Speaking after a European summit on Brexit Sunday, Peter Pellegrini said: “Slovakia will not support this United Nations pact under any circumstances and will not agree with it.”
“As the prime minister, I reject the wording of the compact … and I refuse to enter it into effect in Slovakia,” he said of the document, which describes mass migration as “inevitable, necessary, and desirable”.
“Slovakia does not believe that there is no difference between legal and illegal migration,” Pellegrini told reporters in Brussels, stressing: “We consider economic migration illegal, harmful, and a security risk.”
Foreign affairs minister Miroslav Lajčák had threatened to resign last week unless Slovakia signs up to the so-called Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, telling reporters that his priority in post was “to pursue the vision of a democratic, European Slovakia that is part of solutions”….
President Trump pulled America out of the agreement in December last year, commenting that the compact appeared to demand a “no borders, everyone can come in!” approach to managing migration flows.
Advocates argue the document is not legally binding and so would have no impact on national sovereignty, while the governments of Sweden and Germany claim signing up will benefit their countries and even reduce illegal immigration flows.
Experts have warned that the agreement, which requires signatories “commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination” with measures including state promotion of “diversity”, prevention of “hate speech” and opening up of welfare systems to illegal immigrants, was written in such a way that it would create a legal framework…..
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
What is the source of the bolded quotation at the very top of this article? It doesn’t even seem to be a complete sentence. What is the grammatical subject of “was written”?
Andy says
Rejection of the UN Migration Pact is Increasing Throughout the World!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYGgWpyQ40k
Andy says
God Bless Nationalists, Patriots Around The World. All Countries Around The Globe Need To Reject The UN Migration Pact!
Self preservation of your culture, heritage, traditions and customs is not “anti migrant”, It is showing respect of your ancestors and the people who built the country in the first place!
DECEMBER 11, IS CLOSING IN FAST!!! GET WISE TO THE PACT!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUNHNSJkaEM
United Nations Soft Kill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjL_NgTMgDA
Andy says
UN (UNITED NUT-JOBS) Global Migrant Pact
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_MsdbUgjCw
Andy says
China Goes ‘Ethnic’ Spying As One Million Residents Enter Muslim Homes
https://conservativedailypost.com/china-goes-ethnic-spying-as-one-million-residents-enter-muslim-homes/
Andy says
Global Pact Rejected After Trump Makes Stand
Instead of goose-stepping to the globalist agenda for a mass migration pact, a number
https://conservativedailypost.com/global-pact-rejected-after-trump-makes-stand/
Andy says
Expert: Canada Potential Base 4 Terrorists Attack on USA – Migration Compact Exposed!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEm9TUHiycA
Simo Hayha says
Well, gee whiz, why NOT welcome uneducated, illiterate, unskilled, unemployable, diseased caveman mentality “migrants” by the hundreds of thousands into EVERY Western Country? Heck, “WE HAVE THE MEATS,” as Arby’s constantly advertises. Of course in the political sense, it is “WE HAVE THE MONEY” and migrants who will NOT assimilate or adapt to the norms of the host countries will be content to suck the Welfare coffers DRY and laugh at the stupidity of us! Economic chaos will ensue, and it MAY come down to open Civil War as taxpayers BEGIN to realize that it is THEY who are being sucked dry and wallets emptied by these garden slug slimes!
Andy says
The Pathological Altruism of Justin Trudeau & the Liberal Elites
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-GZRUySW6I
Andy says
Bill C-24: Trudeau Says Terrorists Shouldn’t Be Stripped Of Citizenship In Leaked Audio
https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/09/28/bill-c-24-trudeau-audio-conservatives_n_8206798.html
Robertb says
Yes! Those tiny countries are already inundated by disproportionately large numbers of migrants and are doing us all a favor by revealing the true reality of the situation.
Robert Brooks says
Why so surprised? Was not the previous “Agenda 21” chilling enough? Oh you didn’t read it? Your life depends on it. These people are insane and play for keeps. Keep thinking this stuff is a joke.
Stang says
Mark Spahn are we here to dissect some grammar that you can not disipher because your lefty brain is incapableu ? It says the world is finally waking up to you globalists and thank God for publications like “ jihad Watch , Clairian Project and the Gatestine Instutute “ my God be with you.
Frank Anderson says
US Citizens, Be Very Afraid and completely aware of any treaty the US proposes to sign. Once that treaty is ratified by the Senate on a simple majority vote, it overrides every other law in the US. It may or may not override the Constitution. Article 6 Clause 2, US Constitution.
During the “previous” administration the UN Small Arms Treaty was signed, but not submitted to the Senate for ratification, knowing that it would be rejected even by many Democrats. The evil, corrupt, collaborators in the administration treated the treaty as if it had been ratified anyway, in clear defiance of the Constitution and will of the people.
A major harmful provision of that treaty was the requirement of UN licensing of every gunsmith in the US, at an annual cost of $1,000. Then additional registration and transfer requirements would destroy treasured rights in the only nation left with the Second Amendment.
I welcome correction and additional information whenever I am in error. I thank God frequently that we have the people in charge today that we do. It is like day after a really dark and stormy night.
gravenimage says
Terrifying, Frank.
Kathleen Wallace says
The U.S. should withdraw from the U. N. completely because nutcases are now running this organization. The people at the U.N. seemed to be determined to undermine the economy of all member nations because that is just what would happen if we had the kind of migration that the U.N. is advocating. I say all those who believe in letting illegals come into a country should be forced to pay for the support of these people including permitting them to live on their or live in their homes. Zuckerberg in particular should be forced to permit illegals to camp out on all the land that he owns. We will then see how soon that they change their tune.
NYgal says
It is not a sudden change in the UN. I remember many decades ago stumbling, on a Sunday morning UN program, on the PBS, where an UN representative, who happened to be an American, openly discussed the UN’s goal of become the World’s governing body. I was stunned. I had at the time firmly believed that only crazy, tin hat conspiracy nuts believed in such things. Yet there it was – a discussion about UN becoming a world government. So, it’s not new, just the process took all those decades to get us where we are today.
bonnie loranger says
I agree with you
brane pilot says
UN migration and immigration policy is based on the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees. In 1951, the world had about 2.5 Billion people and the definition of ‘refugee’ was strictly and narrowly defined in the context of individual political dissenters of record, or groups facing genocide.
Since 1951, the global population has surged to 7.5 Billion and overpopulated failed states with high birth rates in the Islamic and Developing world are hemorrhaging excess population across borders. Since 1951, the legal definition of ‘refugee’ has been expanded to include criminals facing execution, persons with chronic communicable disease needing expensive treatment, women in abusive personal relationships, homosexuals, the mentally ill, people from cities with criminal gang problems, the destitute aged, anyone living in a war zone, and people ‘fleeing poverty who want a better life’. All are now regarded as ‘refugee’ candidates if they request asylum in a Western welfare state. Refugees must be provided with free legal counsel and welfare benefits on a par with native citizens while their case is argued in Western courts; often for years. Even if their asylum bid is rejected, they may endlessly appeal the outcome at state expense.
Heads up. It is not 1951 anymore folks. The global population is headed north of 10 Billion by 2050 and if you do not want your children and grandchildren to live as enslaved tax mules in their own country supporting a massive leisure class of ‘refugees’, opening your borders is a very bad idea. People living nightmarish lives bring their nightmares with them and they will not assimilate into your society. They will not work or learn your language or respect your culture. They will outbreed you and you will learn their language, and assimilate into their culture. But the UN is OK with that. That is, in fact, the plan.
The UN believes that the human rights of people who invade your country are more important than the human rights of people not to be invaded. The UN calls those people racists, bigots, xenophobes, etc. Those people have no rights at all. Not even the right to complain or have a contrary opinion.
Mary says
Very well put sir
gravenimage says
Few of these invading Muslims are refugees of any kind.
Emilie Green says
From Richard Gardner’s The Hard Road to World Order (1974),
“In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great “booming, buzzing confusion,” to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault. Of course, for political as well as administrative reasons, some of these specialized arrangements should be brought into an appropriate relationship with the central institutions of the U.N, system, but the main thing is that the essential functions be performed.
“The question is whether this more modest approach can do the job. Can it really bring mankind into the twenty-first century with reasonable prospects for peace, welfare and human dignity? The argument thus far suggests it better had, for there seems to be no alternative. But the evidence also suggests some rounds for cautious optimism.”
Gardner is still alive (b. 1927), teaching a PC/leftist-minded Columbia U., and is, most importantly, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, an organization founded in 1921 (in response to the Senate’s 1919 rejection of the League of Nations) to soften the US up for eventual incorporation into a world government system.
This sovereignty-depriving UN Migration Pact is made of the same trickery intending to erode sovereignty “piece-by-piece.”
The Hard Road to World Order (1974) can be found online.
dan christensen says
The UN Migration Pact is not a Pact.
It is a document declaring that the signatories enter into a state of unconditional surrender to the world’s surplus population. The signatories committing themselves to feed and in every way support that part of humanity for the rest of their natural lives – no questions asked.
Just to protest against this, will be considered a crime against humanity an dealt with accordingly.
Tom S. says
Institutionalize “Hijrah” ? Maybe. But this is primarily about enforcing the Kalergi plan, that the globalists have been pushing to weaken and eventually destroy the West. Christians are organizing to save Europe. This is coming to a head and God Bless the countries of Eastern Europe for resisting.
James Lincoln says
So glad to see that Slovakia has joined the other Visegrad Group members Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic in rejecting the UN Migration Pact ! ! !
Stay strong V4…
somehistory says
The oic is a very large voting bloc at the U.N. The countries are moslim ruled. moslims wish to leave where they are in control in order to take over the countries where they are not in control.
Since it is the goal of moslims to “migrate” to all other countries where their numbers are not yet at 10% or greater, or where they are not running the governments, the moslim countries are using the U.N. to further their goals.
Illegal migration…is not a “right” of humans. moslims are trying to make illegal migration a “right” for themselves…by pretending it will be a “right” for all “migrants.” They wish to make it a “legal right” for themselves to go wherever they please and get on the roles of welfare so as to leech and profit from the hard work of non moslims.
Once they have “migrated<" they will then impelment the U.N., oic, thingy of "no criticism of islam." They will then be the only ones with freedom to speak…and they will…to end Christianity and eliminate Israel.
Mark Swan says
“Experts have warned that the agreement, which requires signatories “commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination” with measures including state promotion of “diversity”, prevention of “hate speech” and opening up of welfare systems to illegal immigrants, was written in such a way that it would create a legal framework”
Yes indeed, an Ideal framework for allowing Muslims to continue their pushiness with legal support.
Muslims and their unequaled nerve.
Robertb says
Why is it that when we present actual hard cold examples that result from a certain method of thinking leads to, we are called mean, Nazis, racists, etc..But like the man said “there’s always some MF who tries to skate up hill”. It can only end in one way.
infidel says
Glad to see that there are some countries that stand up to these Globalist bullies and thugs and their Islamic cronies…
andra says
In Germany we had About 20 petitions to the Bundestag not to sign the pact. At the first place these petitions were not published by the Petition commmitee before the public pressure got too strong. So, on November 19th one – only one of the petitions – got published. Although the online subscribtions was badly disturbed – I guess by the commitee itself – there have been way over 50000 subscribtions within the first two days. Though the quorum was archieved soon this petition will not be discussed by the Bundestag. As they did not publish the petition before midst of November it can be signed until Dec 19th. And the majority of the so-called representatives of the people has decided not to discuss the petition before the signing time has stopped. By December 19th though the pact has been signed by the traitors called German Government and the petition will not be discussed before January because of the Christmas brake at the Bundestag. But by then, I guess, it will be denied discussion because critizising the pact will by then be criminal.
gravenimage says
Thanks for that grim information, Andra.
Laurence says
Likely as most countries, not Canada and the Canadian people as a whole; but the present foolish and dangerous Liberal government under Justin Trudeau (with his very Left liberalism ideas and accompanied beliefs), and of course others who agree with him, as well as others who support him without fully knowing what they do.
In Canada I think saner heads would (and hopefully will) prevail and give Trudeau and his Liberal gang the boot from Parliament and government come next election: if only Canada had a conservative Canada-wide TV station, something akin to Fox in the US, I think a faster increase in Canadian awareness of what is actually taking place with the likes of JT and the Liberals at the helm would guarantee a change in government this coming election. Alas, we have no such TV station, and must rely on the increasingly restrictive (regarding conservatives) online social media, which is scattered hither and thither, and which many people do not access.
Still, having said that, God willing,and sufficient numbers of people knowing and voting against Trudeau and his ways, in 2019 the government will change hands. And then I certainly hope that bad agreements and laws and motions, and pacts, etc., will be undone. May the light of reason return.
Andy says
I hope Canadians Vote for Maxime Bernier’s PPC IN 2019!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsYg4Yrx7lU
ronyvo says
The UN becomes one of the ME Muslim countries under a disguise name of the UN. This body becomes a dangerous org instead of a peace protector. We the sane westerners are still in power to either cleanse it and bring it back to it’s original honorable status or just abandoned it, as if it does not exist. It is a very expensive and useless body.
eduardo odraude says
To all the people who after thousands of years of history still don’t get that censorship is moronic: The remedy for “hate speech” is not government penalties. The remedy for bad speech is more speech.
If the current French and Swedish leaders are as “sophisticated” and “advanced” as they seem to believe themselves, then why are they too backward, reactionary, and ignorant to properly understand the elementary principle of free speech? There is no need for free speech laws to protect speech that no one finds offensive. In other words, free speech laws are there precisely to protect “offensive” speech.
Western Europe needs a First Amendment. But there may be too many leftist troglodytes in Western Europe to establish one of the most basic ABCs of civilization. So Western Europe is circling the drain while the “enlightened” ones preen themselves on their supposedly advanced morality and virtue signal while drowning.
Scott Bolland says
‘Advocates argue the document is not legally binding and so would have no impact on national sovereignty,,,,’
Anyone remember the old ‘seduction’ technique: ‘…just the tip?
Tad says
‘Advocates argue the document is not legally binding and so would have no impact on national sovereignty,,,,’
Anyone remember the old ‘seduction’ technique: ‘…just the tip?
gravenimage says
UN Migration Pact takes aim at “hate speech,” Slovakia becomes the tenth country to reject it
………………..
Hear, hear, Slovakia!
Andy says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXatZoMWHP8
What they won’t tell you about the UN Global Compact on Migration
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUzmXT-UkK0
JD says
Many of these migrants are so deranged when they come to France they will be so disgusted with the filth culture like porno and incest some will go mad and harm some innocent French people. They will also lose the hard working traditions they did in their own countries that some communist will tell them they don’t need to work.