Some time ago the YouTube channel apologiamixer published this video review of The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS:
This video has been up for over a month, but yesterday YouTube sent apologiamixer this notice:
Hi apologiamixer,
As you may know, our Community Guidelines describe which content we allow – and don’t allow – on YouTube. Your video The History of Jihad review by Dale Brown was flagged to us for review. Upon review, we’ve determined that it may not be suitable for all viewers and it has been placed behind an age restriction.
Video content restrictions
If a video contains violent or graphic content that appears to be posted in a shocking, sensational, or disrespectful manner, it’s less likely to be allowed on YouTube. We also don’t allow content that’s intended to incite violence or encourage dangerous activities. We review content on a case by case basis and will only make limited exceptions for appropriate educational, documentary, artistic, and scientific contexts, where the purpose of posting is clear.
In light of this, we ask that uploaders post as much information as possible in the title and description of their video to help us and viewers understand the primary purpose of the video. Please note, even with this additional context, it’s still not acceptable to post violent or gory content that’s primarily intended to be shocking, sensational, or disrespectful and this type of content is prohibited on YouTube. Learn more here.
How you can respond
If you believe this was a mistake, we’d like to hear from you. To appeal this age restriction, please submit this form. Our team will thoroughly review your appeal and will contact you again very soon.For more information on YouTube’s Community Guidelines, please visit our Help Center.
Sincerely,
– The YouTube Team
This is absurd, of course. As you can see in the video, it contains no “violent or graphic content that appears to be posted in a shocking, sensational, or disrespectful manner.” Nor does it incite violence or encourage dangerous activities. But it does contain truths about the jihad threat that powerful people today don’t want you to know.
What is YouTube so afraid of? What are they so desperate to prevent people from finding out? Discover for yourself in The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS.
Angel says
The link to Help Center doesn’t seem to work.
Andy says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtU2ZJ9oS3I
Andy says
Katie Hopkins OBLITERATES Delusional Leftist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7swS0dExZuw
Nietzsche says
Wow, the first interviewer really, really hates her, doesn’t he? He’d love to slap her. What a hateful prick.
Andy says
What’s REALLY in the UN Migrant Compact
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KA_SzIc1DA
Andy says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXatZoMWHP8
What they won’t tell you about the UN Global Compact on Migration
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUzmXT-UkK0
Mike says
Actually Ian Hislop is far from hateful, it was an interview it is his job to question her and right to do so it is how we get to hear different points of view.
Reante says
That’s like rating history as though it were a movie or some kind of entertainment.
gravenimage says
Exactly, Renate.
Jim E says
To leftists the only true history is the one they believe. All others, no matter how well researched and supported are to be considered fiction or entertainment.
Keith Cashman says
Who are the decision makers? please present a list of them and their credentials that show their qualifications for censorship (and impartiality in this case).
We expect similar for anyone who wish to control our lives.
Thank you from Keith Cashman.
mortimer says
The social media are owned largely by mega-rich Muslims like Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal.
mortimer says
Google owns youtube, but google itself is owned by Alphabet Inc. which has five main shareholders, none of whom are Muslims. Pichai Sundararajan is one of the five. He is a Tamil high-caste Hindu.
I can’t imagine he would be interested in defending Islam from criticism. Something funny is going on a google.
mortimer says
Someone who is in the financial community should check the Arabian and Muslim ownership of Western media and social media and make a report for Jihad Watch. This is a rather important topic.
Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal of Saudi Arabia announced in Aug. 2018 he purchased 2.3 percent of Snap.
Alwaleed, who serves as majority owner and chairman of the Kingdom Holding Company, is also a significant investor in News Corp, Citigroup, and the Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts.
Someone familiar with the market can provide a big help if you could look up which media companies are Muslim-controlled.
Buck Turgidson says
> Pichai Sundararajan is one of the five. He is a Tamil high-caste Hindu.
>
> I can’t imagine he would be interested in defending Islam from criticism.
…and I can’t imagine Jews who would be interested in rabidly defending gun control, but they exist.
Jorge Garcia-Maneiro says
A B S O LU T E L Y !!!! Petro-dollars have enabled the Arab-muslims to get decision making power in so many sectors of the financial, commercial, real estate and media-communication activities! Why do you think the English,in particular, have been caught with their pants down in their own country??!!!
Jon Sobieski says
Yeah the rich muslims and the sovereign funds of rich muslim countries own substantial parts of Twitter, FB and Google. It is why things that criticize islam just disappear like they never existed. a kinda jahiliyah erasure.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
To review a video, the YouTube Community Guidelines Enforcement Team will have to watch the video, and while they are doing so, they can conveniently jot down the time-stamp of any objectionable parts. Did the video review team (how many member? just one?) do so in this case? The only thing I saw that might be objectionable is the flaying scene at 1:10. What this scene cited? Will the objection be removed if this 5-second scene is deleted?
Joe says
Not even Pewdiepie, the largest channel on YouTube, can figure out why YouTube demonetises his videos. You would think YouTube would care about its largest channel.
This video has a guy getting skinned and some nudity. So yeah, it is going to be age restricted. Age restrictions are put on videos for a lot less, but they are meaningless. Even 2 year olds, yes they know how to use YouTube, are not banned from anything. I noticed that one day when I was babysitting.
Westman says
What dummies! Nothing makes youth more interested in something than to be prohibited by adults from viewing it. YouTube might as well have displayed a caption reading, “Unconventional Media Most Attractive To Youth”
This is truly a demonstration of the Left’s inability to counter the truth with a cogent argument; leaving them with only name-calling and censure.
Just a Concerned Citizen says
While this may be true, I have also personally experienced in the past that there are many folks who will use the fact that a video you are citing is “age restricted” as their excuse for not watching and dismissing your point.
Similarly, when I have recommended Mr. Spencer’s books in the past, I have had a few individuals who did a cursory Google search and determined that since he is not welcome in the UK, he is clearly a bad person and can be ignored out of hand (and it lets them off the hook to learn anything that challenges their worldview).
James Lincoln says
Just a Concerned Citizen,
Using the current admission standards to the UK, I am much more interested in hearing from people who are not welcome there, like Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller.
Mike says
Me too
mortimer says
THIS IS AN EXCELLENT VIDEO … SEND IT TO ALL YOUR EMAIL LIST …
How many people were killed BECAUSE OF JIHAD?
How about 270 million or 500 killed every day since Mohammed.
270 million lives have been snuffed out by Islam:
-120 million black Africans killed by the Islamic slave trade
-80 million Hindus killed in the Hindu genocides committed by Muslim invaders
-60 million Christians killed in jihads
-10 million Buddhists killed in jihads
-270 million total deaths due to jihad
-29,800 deadly jihad attacks have occurred since 9-11 … 10 deaths per day
-IN THE LAST MONTH: 443 killed in jihad attacks, 454 wounded
-Islam has killed an average of 19,300 people every year since Mohammed
-Islam has killed an average of 500 people every day since Mohammed.
-Islam has killed an average of 20 people every hour and killed 1 every three minutes since Mohammed. Do the math.
A religion that kills one person every three minutes is the definition of a ‘Death Cult’.
Terry Gain says
Mortimer
According to the Religion of Peace website the number of attacks since 9/11 is 34,213. And the number killed in the last month was 880. Usually it is above 1,200.
Indiana Tom says
You Tube also has some of the videos of Survival Lilly being in the restricted category. Survival Lilly Restricted shows Lilly shooting a bolt action .17HMR rifle at a paper target and other such topics requiring “mature” audiences. I have not seen new videos from Dutch Bushcraft Knives either and they stated they might have to go off the air. You Tube did not like the word Knives in their title. Then Different Russia was being harped on in that not enough people were watching it enough hours of view time.
I can see why a lot of the gun video makers went to Full 30, as they always get jacked around like Hickok45.
I dunno, maybe they could have Jihad topical videos on the Full 30 channel site?
Wellington says
It is both sad and bitterly comic, actually dangerous in sundry instances as well, that so many attempts by a veritable multitude are made to, one way or another, deny the inherent violence-prone and intolerant nature of Islam. As here.
Really, truly and verily (sorry for the redundancy but I am in a repetitive mode as I often am—one of my many faults but at my age I don’t care anymore), it is really stunning, highly instructive too, that an untold number of efforts are made by both Muslims and non-Muslims alike in our time to obfuscate or deny the inherent nature of Islam. Which inherent nature is inimical to liberty, equality under the law, women’s rights, music, fun, alcohol, romantic love and most every other damn thing that makes life worth living.
Ah, Islam. What a monstrous error. Ditto for all those who try to cove up or make excuses for this error. Time for a beer (while I can still have one lest Islam gets its way worldwide).
Westman says
Defending a false image of Islam is like putting the sacophagus on the Chernobyl Reactor. Some “crud”, representative of what’s actually inside, will always get through to belie the intended image.
I don’t drink beer although a friendly conversation about the great things in life, largely devalued by Islam, over a lunch of pork ribs, would be pleasant. I hope this season finds you with health and enjoyment.
gravenimage says
YouTube clamps age restriction on video review of The History of Jihad
…………………
This is ludicrous. While Dale Brown refers to Islamic violence, there is nothing graphic in his presentation. Even the images of Muslim warfare and slavery he uses are mostly Victorian pieces–notable for their great restraint.
Most children would pass this by, simply there is nothing to attract children in this content. But the upshot is that fewer people–fewer *adults*–are apt to see this with such restrictions. That is its actual purpose. How dare Infidels learn about the threat of Islam? Bad dhimmis….
LytchZam says
Bought the book – almost to the end. I read this somewhere before… Now watch it happen in real time as Prophecy plays out.
Jayell says
“If a video contains violent or graphic content that appears to be posted in a shocking, sensational, or disrespectful manner, it’s less likely to be allowed on YouTube……”
So, if someone posted a video of the Belsen, etc., Youtube would ban it because it was ‘too schocking’ or ‘disrespectful to Nazis’? Yet Islam and the Nazis are following an almost identical agenda!
Daniel Silvan says
Too young to watch the truth about Islam, but not too young to be forced to attend a mosque by their schools in the West or to be murdered for not being Muslim.
gravenimage says
Not too young to be raped by Muslims, either.
Darin Martin says
Of course, this matches their leftist secular agenda to a T, they wouldn’t want our children learning the truth about the cult of islam, lest they grow up knowing the truth of Christ, because staring the devil in the face through islamic teacnings can and will do that!
God bless you Mr Spencer.
Ed Lee says
This age restriction is similar to our government’s age restrictions on buying firearms. Their goal is to raise an entire generation of Americans to the age of 21 or older who have never seen, touched, or discharged a firearm. Likewise, liberal media’s goal is conceal the facts about Islam from as many people as possible. One unanswered question in relation to Google and YouTube is, what have they done with Sergey Brin? As a refugee from the massive oppression of the Soviet Union, he would never go along with this kind of censorship. Where do they have him locked up and muzzled?
Alain Lenferna de la Motte says
There is definitely some kind of global network that is manipulating media, production, law, religion (Islam excepted if one accepts it to be a religion), education, entertainment and other key institutions around the Western world. It is so visible that one would have to be blind not to see it. But perhaps most ordinary people like me do not want to see reality so as to not burst their balloons of fantasy.