The French police do not engage in “harassment,” as the Muslims complain; there is only the occasional attempt of a frazzled and frightened gendarmerie to discourage the drug dealers, the thieves, the criminals of all kinds, including terrorists on the run, who find their refuge in Saint-Denis. So menacing are the Muslim gangs that the French police now must enter Saint-Denis with at least four policemen in each squad car.
Riots erupted in February last year after a young black man was allegedly sexually assaulted with a baton by police officers.
Migrant camps, set up in tents along the Seine in this area of Paris, were destroyed by the police in May, with the occupants who didn’t get away taken for processing in detention centers after a raid.
And what were the French to do? Should they simply have allowed these miserable illegal camps to remain in the very heart of Paris, right along the Seine? With the open trafficking in drugs, the garbage piling up, the human stench, too, not only from an absence of toilets — in the middle of a city that lives by tourism, they had to do something.
Yasser Lout of CCIF (Group Combating Islamophobia in France) said attacks and harassment of innocent Muslim communities had ‘risen considerably since the terrorist attacks’, even though many of the victims of the 2015 Paris outrage were Muslims.
“Mosques have been firebombed, and Muslim centers daubed with pigs’ blood. New powers for the security services make house searches and arrest easier, especially when suspects are targeted because of their ‘physical [Arab] appearance’, said Mr Louati.
One would like to have examples provided of “innocent Muslim communities” that have suffered “attacks and harassment” in France. I have searched up hill and down dale and have found no attacks on such “innocent communities,” but rather, a few isolated incidents — three blank grenades flung on the ground outside a mosque, a single bullet hole in the same mosque fired at night when no one would be present, several shots fired at an empty prayer hall, pigs’ heads placed outside several mosques. These are, of course, deplorable, but there was no physical injuries to anyone. No “communities” under attack. No murders of Muslims. Nothing like what has happened at Charlie Hebdo, or at the HyperCacher, or at the Bataclan, in Paris, or in Toulouse outside a Jewish school, or in Nice, along the Promenade des Anglais, or in a church in Normandy.
The influx of migrants into Saint-Denis has been made worse because of a crackdown at Calais which has seen the infamous Jungle camp — used by migrants as a base to try to reach England — demolished and thousands of inmates dispersed.
One group I met comprised migrants trying to reach Britain who told me they were originally from countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh and Ghana, which may be troubled but are hardly war-torn. I also met men from Afghanistan.
Andrew Malone notes that the French helped prevent migrants from reaching England by demolishing their camp at Calais, thereby “making worse” the “influx” of migrants to Saint-Denis. What should the French have done? Left all those Muslims to continue disrupting local life from the hideous camp they constructed in Calais, which the French rightly call the “Jungle”? Left them undisturbed so that they could continue to engage in drug trafficking and petty crime from their roost in the Jungle, and from which they keep trying to smuggle themselves, inside lorries, into England? The French police were doing the British a favor, by destroying that camp for criminals intent on entering the U.K.
‘We will stay here until we can get to Britain,‘ I was told. ‘In London they will give you a home; here, they just let you sleep in a park. I will make friends there and find a girlfriend.’
And why do these people want to get to England? Because they think — they’ve heard through the Muslim tam-tam — that the benefits are even better there than in France. That’s what their movements are all about — finding the most generous welfare state, helping themselves to every benefit on offer, supplementing that with money made from crime. No, in London “they will not give you a home” — at least not yet, but it’s an understandable mistake, given how much Muslims do receive. As for finding a “girfriend” — well, there’s always Rotherham. Is that what Malone’s Muslim informant had in mind, as I suspect? Not exactly a desirable kind of immigrant. He says nothing about wanting to contribute to Great Britain. He wants a free house. He wants a girlfriend. That’s the extent of his vision.
Paul says
My favourite muslim who used to scream “I hate you English, your Queen and your police ” is now getting British citizenship 20 years after coming over in a lorry. During that time he has never worked, burnt down two properties and made everybodies life hell.
Sometimes I despair.
Paul
gravenimage says
Insanity.
jewdog says
The French people should be rising up and rioting over this. At least they’re rioting, anyway, though probably because of the public expenditures in accommodating these leeches, rationalized as carbon taxes. If nothing else stops this insanity, money will.
Victoria says
I think one condition has produced the other. When you have to stand by unarmed and witness the destruction of your way of life by an invasion of a people bent on destroying you and your elected officials do nothing about it except raise your taxes and living expenses to support the drones who feed on your welfare. Yes, those conditions cause frustration and the perfect storm for riots..
Jayell says
“He says nothing about wanting to contribute to Great Britain. He wants a free house. He wants a girlfriend. That’s the extent of his vision….”
Sounds like the UK is the land flowing with milk and honey…. and wanton women. Well, they will get their milk and honey at Tesco’s or Sainsbury’s with all the benefits money, and they have already shown that they can get their (under-age) ‘wanton women’ courtesy of the drinks and the drugs that these friends of theirs will supply them with.
Anjuli Pandavar says
“pigs’ heads placed outside several mosques. These are, of course, deplorable, but there was no physical injuries to anyone.”
—
If there were “no physical injuries to anyone,” then what makes this (of course) deplorable? Where, exactly, do Muslims draw the line? At what point do they consider their actions “deplorable”? No such line exists. Deploring even an action that harms no one, is insisting on tying one hand behind your back while someone comes at you with a machete, and feeling superior for doing so.
mortimer says
Good point by AP: ‘At what point do (Muslims) consider their actions “deplorable”? No such line exists.’
Even if they disagree with another Muslim terrorist … the jihadists ‘intentions’ are to spread Islamic rule … so no Muslim may disagree with that.
ALL Muslims participate in jihad … if even by their SILENCE in condemning jihadic TERRORISM.
K.8.60 ‘TURHIBUNNA’ (terrorize them) … Allah’s eternally valid words .. that may not be contradicted.
A number of hadiths quote Mohammed as telling Muslims they will be ‘weak’ and ‘garbage’ if they do not conduct TERRORIST JIHAD.
Savvy Kafir says
I had a similar reaction to that line, Anjuli.
“…a few isolated incidents — three blank grenades flung on the ground outside a mosque, a single bullet hole in the same mosque fired at night when no one would be present, several shots fired at an empty prayer hall, pigs’ heads placed outside several mosques. These are, of course, deplorable, but there was no physical injuries to anyone.”
…………………………………………….
We are in a state of war — a war of conquest that Muslims have brought to the West. How is this invasion going to be repelled? The people of most European countries can obviously expect no help from their governments, which actively support the invaders, and harass & prosecute citizens who complain about the Islamization of their societies. They can’t expect any help from the police, who are too busy trying to make nice with the invaders to protect its native citizens. They can’t expect any help from the military, which is controlled by PC, Islam-friendly politicians. And they sure as hell can’t just talk it out with the Muslim invaders, who have a very clear agenda that is not open to any sort of honest discussion. And because critics of Islam are viciously attacked by the mainstream media — and some lose their livelihood for simply posting criticism of Islam on social media, etc. — individual people feel more & more helpless, anxious, and angry.
As John F. Kennedy said: “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”
That is what is beginning to happen, on a very small scale, in parts of Europe. Desperate people are fighting back against a savage invasion — in a conflict in which they are pitted against Muslim colonizers, their own governments & police forces, and the mainstream media. It is a desperate fight, with the fate of the civilized world at stake. There will be violence, because that has been made inevitable by the Muslim invaders, by Western governments, and by the mainstream media.
With all of the violence that has been coming OUR way in recent years, from devout Muslims throughout the West, I don’t see pigs’ heads or bullet holes in empty mosques as “deplorable” behavior. I see it as the desperate actions of desperate people. I see it as inevitable … and just the beginning.
gravenimage says
Patriotic people should be out demonstrating–if enough do, the governments will be forced to take notice.
Savvy Kafir says
Yes, patriots should be protesting and demanding solutions from their governments. But they’re not. Not nearly enough of them — even now, after all that’s transpired in recent years. And that’s one more reason some patriots are feeling desperate, and are beginning to take desperate actions.
I’m not shooting holes in mosques myself, or tossing pigs’ heads at them. But when others do, I won’t denounce it as “deplorable” behavior. Under the circumstances, I consider it inevitable. People are feeling a need to make Muslims feel unwelcome, and their options have been severely limited.
Mike says
So well said, and absolutely spot on.
mortimer says
SAINT-DENIS … NO-GO ZONE … ZONE INTERDITE … ZONE DE NON-DROIT .. ZONE HORS DROIT … ZONE HARAM CHARIA … ZONE D’EXCLUSION DE NON-MUSULMANS.
Islam uses no-go zones as the locus for jihad conspiracies against the HOST COUNTRY.
We must assume that jihadists are plotting an uprising in France.
Only MASSIVE DEPROGRAMMING OF MUSLIMS WITHIN THE FRENCH SCHOOL SYSTEM will prevent the COMING ISLAMIC UPRISING.
France will not have enough police to stop the coming Islamist civil war in France.
gravenimage says
Now the schools are supposed to “deprogram” Muslims?
James Pierce says
I’m not sure it’s even possible to deprogram people who have 1400 years worth of perpetual victimhood mentality built in from the second they enter the world
mortimer says
Hugh Fitzgerald writes: “Not exactly a desirable kind of immigrant. He says nothing about wanting to contribute to Great Britain. He wants a free house. He wants a girlfriend. That’s the extent of his vision.”
Exactly.
The UN migration compact says it will be ‘safe, orderly, regular’. However, the reverse will be true.
Unlimited by migration of SCUM such as described by Fitzgerald will be EXTREMELY DANGEROUS, CHAOTIC and IRREGULARLY CRIMINAL. Criminals will make fortunes bringing in the ILLEGAL MIGRANTS and the UNLIMITED MIGRANTS WILL SOON OVERWHELM the local police, army, army reserves and volunteer police auxiliaries. THERE WILL SOON NOT BE ENOUGH POLICE and a REVOLUTION will break out in almost every place where MASS MIGRATION occurs … at this point MARITIAL LAW WILL BE DECLARD and NO FREEDOM OF ANY KIND will be tolerated.
ALMOST ALL ECONOMIC ACTIVITY will DIMINISH and only the ECONOMY OF IMPORTING ILLEGALS will be highly profitable.
mortimer says
Correction: Unlimited (omit: by) migration of SCUM as described by Fitz…
Carolyne says
I never liked Paris even before the Islamic invasion. I found the French to be very rude and frankly, even with all the cosmetics available, i.e. deodorant, some of them don’t smelll too good. But nobody deserves this. Why aren’t the French as rude to the Muslims as they are to peaceful American tourists who are, after all, spending money?
Larry says
70 years of “cheese eating surrender monkeys” and the fact that US troops looted their way across France in 1944 springs to mind as to why the French don’t like Americans.
Basically post War American treatment of France, such as the antipathy of it’s politicians and military leaders towards de Gaulle, and the above have turned France from America’s best friend to a country that really doesn’t like America.
Carolyne says
That’s OK. I don’t like the French ingrates either. We have saved them twice due to their cowardice. We won’t do it a third time.
Garfield says
…. “and find a girlfriend.”
Any non Muslim who allows a parasite to USE her is just suicidal. Or brainwashed. I don’t know wich….both?
gravenimage says
A Report From Hell: Seine Saint-Denis (Part Three)
…………………………..
The very definition of a “No Go Zone”–where the police themselves are afraid to go.
More:
‘We will stay here until we can get to Britain,‘ I was told. ‘In London they will give you a home; here, they just let you sleep in a park. I will make friends there and find a girlfriend.’
…………………………..
“Give you a home”–note that this thug has *no* idea of working and renting or buying a place to live. Instead, he wants the dole–as big as possible. And he wants an Infidel woman to sexually abuse and rob, in addition–and likely to pass around to his new Muslim friends. *Ugh*.
Save Europe says
Yet another case of lies, from the supposed religion of the perpetually offended.
Absolute B.S!!!!
Mike says
Unlike Christian refugees from places in the Middle East, or former Soviet refugees, these 3rd world Muslims and Africans, are nothing more than parasites, intending to guilt and leech off the first and second world. Bacteria-nothing more.