“Detective Superintendent Markus Kiiskinen was careful to add to their warning: ‘I hope this will not result in more racism. The police would like to emphasise that not all people with foreign backgrounds are dishonest or criminals.’”
Got it, thanks. And here again we see that it is always the top priority of Western authorities to make sure that no one thinks ill of Islam, or of mass Muslim migration.
But again: why does this keep happening? One survivor of a Muslim rape gang in the UK said that her rapists would quote Quran to her, and believed their actions justified by Islam.
The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
“Young girls in Finland are increasingly groomed and abused by adult migrant men – Police issue warning,” Voice of Europe, December 5, 2018:
Oulu police have recently been informed of dozens of cases of adult men attempting to lure young girls online.
Police are saying that men with foreign-backgrounds and poor Finnish-language skills are contacting “significantly younger” girls in the area, resulting in aggravated sexual abuse.
This has prompted their cautioning young girls and their parents about online predators at a time when nine men are under suspicion of raping and sexually abusing young girls.
There are currently three cases of migrant men suspected of sexually abusing children in Oulu. One such case involved sexually exploiting a 10-14 year old girl over several months and in all of the cases the rapes and sexual abuse were against children under the age of 15.
In all of the cases, the suspects are refugees or asylum seekers, according to police. Some have received Finnish citizenship, received refugee status or awaiting asylum decisions.
Detective Superintendent Markus Kiiskinen was careful to add to their warning: “I hope this will not result in more racism. The police would like to emphasise that not all people with foreign backgrounds are dishonest or criminals”….
FYI says
Today is Finland’s Independence Day.
What was the point of Finland gaining independence only to LOSE it to the multicult globalist agenda?
Typical Dhimmi police:instead of dealing with the reality of migrant rapists and molesters they are more concerned about being politically correct and seen to be not racist.
Today is Finland’s Independence Day.WHAT Independence,people of Finland?
mortimer says
Exactly! The Finns are now SUBJUGATED UNDER SHARIA RAPE LAW.
There is NO Sharia punishment if a Muslims rapes a non-Muslim.
mortimer says
Exactly. Finland is now SUJBUGATED under Sharia law.
There is NO SHARIA PUNISHMENT when a Muslim RAPES a non-Muslim woman.
Markus Kiiskinen is an uninformed POLYANNA !
Please learn about AL WALAA WAL BARAA (Islam’s teaching of hatred towards the KUFAAR).
-Imam Abdul-Latif ibn Abdur-Rahman Rahimullah said, “It is not possible for someone to realize Tawheed (Islamic faith) and act upon it, and yet not be HOSTILE against the mushrikeen (i.e. wrong worshippers). So anyone who isn’t HOSTILE against the mushrikeen, then it cannot be said that he acts upon Tawheed nor that he realizes it.” [ad-Durar as-Saniyyah 8/167]
-“The doctrine of al Walaa wal Baraa is the REAL IMAGE for the actual practice of this faith.” – source “Al Walaa wal Baraa According to the Aqeedah of the Salaf”, by Sheikh Muhammad Saeed al Qatani, authoritative Saudi Sharia lawyer and imam at the Abu Bakr and Al Furqan Mosques in Mecca. – https://islamfuture.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/al-wala-wal-bara-according-to-the-aqeedah-of-the-salaf-parts-123/
-Shaykh Ahmad ibn ‘Atiq said:
“There isn’t in the Book of Allah the Exalted – after the issue concerning the obligation of tawheed and the forbiddance of its opposite (kufr=wrong belief)- any issue which has as so many proofs, nor so clearly explained, than the issue of al-walaa’ and al-baraa’.” (W-B is ‘Islamic apartheid’)
– Dr. Muhammad Saeed Al-Qahtaani said: “Thus, it is clear that Al-Wala’ Wal-Bara calls on Muslims to “love” their fellow Muslims and hate the non-Muslim (or Kafir).”
– from Sufi scholar Ahmad Sirhindi (1564-1624): “The honour of Islam lies in INSULTING kufr and kafirs. One who respects the kafirs dishonours the Muslims… The real purpose of levying jiziya on them is to HUMILIATE them to such an extent that they may not be able to dress well and to live in grandeur. They should constantly remain TERRIFIED and TREMBLING. It is intended to hold them under CONTEMPT and to uphold the honour and might of Islam.”
– from ibn Taymiyya, “Book of Emaan”: “… true believers show ANIMOSITY and HATRED towards disbelievers and NEVER support them.”
– from Umar Sulayman ‘Abd-Allaah al-Ashqar, “Belief in Allah”: “The Muslim should regard the Kuffaar as ENEMIES and HATE them because of their kufr (wrong belief), just as he hates their kufr (disbelief) itself.”
– from [Chap.iv] “The Islaamic Concept of al-Walaa’ wal-Baraa’” by Khalid El-Gharib: “… to SHOW ENMITY to those who show enmity to Allaah and His Messenger”.
(Note: Muslims are to visibly demonstrate their ENMITY or HATRED towards the kufaar)
– from a lecture given by Sheikh Abdullah al-Faisal (H.A.): “The implication of al-Baraa is that one HATES for the sake of Allah (SWT)…Al-Baraa means to recognize who your enemies are and to HATE them and EXTERMINATE them in their Endeavour to get rid of your Deen, al-Islam…Al-Baraa is to HATE the people who propagate Baatil (falsehood)—the Muslim should HATE them and (at least desire to) KILL them when the time comes.”
(Note: not ‘if the time comes’, but ‘WHEN the time comes.)
– “Killing a Kafir who is fighting you is OK. Killing a Kafir for any reason (i.e. criticism of Islam), you can say, it is OK – even if there is NO REASON for it. You can poison, ambush and kill non-believers. You must have a stand with your heart, with your tongue, with your money, with your hand, with your sword, with your Kalashnikov. Don’t ask shall I do this, just do it.”Abu Hamza al-Masri (Egyptian born British Cleric)
– “As a Muslim, I must have hatred for anything non-Islam” – Anjem Choudary.
gravenimage says
At least the Finnish police are acknowledging that this is a problem–that’s better than in some places.
abad says
What are they doing about it though?
Are they making any effort to deport these Moslems who commit a crime on Finnish soil?
A felony like rape, in this case, merits deportment.
gravenimage says
It’s been pretty bad in Finland, abad. Here is one appalling case from just a few months ago:
“Finland: Muslim migrant has sex with 10-year-old girl, court says it’s not rape”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/05/finland-muslim-migrant-has-sex-with-10-year-old-girl-court-says-its-not-rape
Mirren10 says
”Typical Dhimmi police:instead of dealing with the reality of migrant rapists and molesters they are more concerned about being politically correct and seen to be not racist”
Yep. See Roitheram. and other places in the UK.
Police, in just about every EU country, have abdicated their job, ie: to uphold the law, and keep citizens safe, All they are concerned with is keeping their jobs safe, which means not being accused of ‘islamophobia’, and keeping in good with the hierarchy. They are despicable scum.
Rufolino says
And what about the United Kingdom, with its Mother of Parliaments and its heroic history, currently appeasing Islam and consigning itself to the trash-bin !!
james says
Thank you for speaking about this problem!
Emilie Green says
If the MSM, leftists, and politicians of all stripes, and here the police, didn’t keep reminding me that Islam is the religion of peace, I might, if left to the evidence of my eyes, come to entirely different opinion.
James Lincoln says
Emilie,
Islam is the religion of peace, Antifa is anti-fascist, black is white, right is wrong, etc.
At least half of the world has lost its mind.
mortimer says
ISLAM IS THE RELIGION OF PEACE AND 2+2=5 !!!
“2+2=5” … taken from George Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four.
The ‘Thought Police’ in the novel coerce self-aware citizens into admitting that two plus two equals five to prove the point that even though two plus two does not logically equal five, logic does not matter when no one else is willing to agree that two plus two equals anything else, under threat of pain or death.
Mac-101 says
Exactly. It is ALL part of the conditioning of Western Civilized Individuals to accept everything and anything that the state says, even though they KNOW it is a lie!
DHazard says
The European definition of racism means a distate for Islam, Muslims or both It has lost all of it’s original meaning and is now a completely neutered word. When one European calls another European a racist it can mean they have posted a detailed list of the way they want to kill Muslims, or it can mean they simply retweeted a quote from the Quran that Muslims don’t want to think about. It is interchangeable with “Islamophobe” but is closer to being how real human beings feel about Islam.
BTW – when it comes to racism Arab Muslims lead the pack. They pretty much consider everyone else to be beneath them and sometimes not even human.
Benedict says
Questions: why are these “significantly younger girls” so easily contactable and rapable? Is it because they are in heat or because they don’t wear Muslim garb? Or is it because of indifferent parents and a culture that expects teenage girls to have a sex life and therefore provides them with free contraceptives in schools and other institutions? Or is it a combination of all these factors?
I’m just asking because young sex-craving Muslim men are too simplistic an answer.
gravenimage says
Benedict has said many times her before that Western women should wear the Burqa and Niqab, and that little girls should be forcibly veiled.
And notice his blaming the victims–that if Infidel girls are raped by Muslims that it must be their own fault. *Ugh*.
Benedict says
Here cravenimage goes again and I’ve already typed this comment to her in advance:
We have reached a point in the West where public nakedness is less offensive to secular people than full body covering of Muslim women. I have *only* recommended and expressed support for the latter as a sarcastic comment to the former and suggested a causal connexion between the two. The distortion by cravenimage of this possible far fetched idea goes like this:
“Benedict has said before that women in the West should wear the Burqa and that girls should be forced to do so–and that they are “naked” if they do not.”
That’s a preposterous and perfidious summation of my comments. We might all disagree about something, but let’s disagree about things expressed and not conjure up straw-men to be knocked down.
gravenimage says
The appalling Benedict wrote:
Here cravenimage goes again and I’ve already typed this comment to her in advance:
………………………..
Apparently Benedict considers me “craven” for not wanting to be forced into a Burqa. So sorry. As for his typing this comment in advance, this is because he knows that I am going to take him to task for this sickening repeated desire for free Western women to cover their faces.
More:
We have reached a point in the West where public nakedness is less offensive to secular people than full body covering of Muslim women.
………………………..
Public nudity is actually quite rare in the West–not rife, as Benedict repeatedly pretends.
As for the idea that the Burqa is “modest”, nothing could be further from the truth. This is about telling Muslim men who they have the “right” to rape, including these unveiled under-aged girls.
Benedict has never said how rape and sex slavery are ‘modest’.
More:
I have *only* recommended and expressed support for the latter as a sarcastic comment to the former and suggested a causal connexion between the two. The distortion by cravenimage of this possible far fetched idea goes like this:
………………………..
There is nothing “sarcastic” about urging Western women to accept the horror of the Burqa, as Benedict pretends. And no–Muslims do not want women to be immured in the Burqa because Westerners are (supposedly) constantly nude in public. In fact, places where the Burqa and Niqab are most common are places like Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan–these places are not affected by Westerners wearing skimpy clothing.
In fact, immuring women in Purdah in Islam goes back to the “Prophet” himself, and has *nothing* to do with nudist colonies or nude beaches.
Moreover, if Benedict were *really* just concerned about people being “nude” if not wearing the Burqa, then why would he not urge men to wear the Burqa and Niqab, as well? But he does not–he only wants to force this on women. He has been asked about this at least a half dozen times now, by myself and others–but has always sidestepped it. This is because he only wants to victimize women and girls in this manner.
More:
“Benedict has said before that women in the West should wear the Burqa and that girls should be forced to do so–and that they are “naked” if they do not.”
That’s a preposterous and perfidious summation of my comments. We might all disagree about something, but let’s disagree about things expressed and not conjure up straw-men to be knocked down.
………………………..
Note that Benedict says that I am mistaken about his position–but then does not say in what way I am wrong. *Very* telling.
There’s more on his urging Western women to cover up here:
“UN Human Rights Committee says France violated human rights of two Muslimas by fining them for wearing niqab”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/un-human-rights-committee-says-france-violated-human-rights-of-two-muslimas-by-fining-them-for-wearing-niqab#comment-2004234
(from that comment on down)
Until this abominable philosophy [people supposedly regularly going naked in the West–GI] is protested in my country – which it is not – I will delight in seeing Muslim women wearing niqab and will even defend their right to do so and also encourage other women to wear niqab.
Here’s more:
“Algeria: MP calls burqa ban in public sector’“a declared war on Islam'”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/algeria-mp-calls-burqa-ban-in-public-sector-a-declared-war-on-islam#comment-2004807
(from that comment on down)
“I fully sympathizes with a fight against the burqa and niqab in the Muslim world. In the West, however, I suggest they are a justified “divine design” or nemesis designed to expose the hypocrisy in condemning a full-body cloak for women while promoting and allowing vulgar, public nudity for both sexes…”
And here he is, finding no problem with the forced veiling of little girls:
“Hugh Fitzgerald: Mind The Gap, Or Signs of Sanity in France”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/hugh-fitzgerald-mind-the-gap-or-signs-of-sanity-in-france#comment-2005406
(Benedict has other comments on that thread, as well)
This veil-thing is much ado about nothing.
…
Grimly, in the past several months Benedict has only occasionally commented where his is *not* urging free Western women to adopt the hideous Muslim slave rag. Very troubling.
gravenimage says
The appalling Benedict wrote:
Here cravenimage goes again and I’ve already typed this comment to her in advance:
………………………..
Apparently Benedict considers me “craven” for not wanting to be forced into a Burqa. So sorry. As for his typing this comment in advance, this is because he knows that I am going to take him to task for this sickening repeated desire for free Western women to cover their faces.
More:
We have reached a point in the West where public nakedness is less offensive to secular people than full body covering of Muslim women.
………………………..
Public nudity is actually quite rare in the West–not rife, as Benedict repeatedly pretends.
As for the idea that the Burqa is “modest”, nothing could be further from the truth. This is about telling Muslim men who they have the “right” to rape, including these unveiled under-aged girls.
Benedict has never said how rape and sex slavery are ‘modest’.
More:
I have *only* recommended and expressed support for the latter as a sarcastic comment to the former and suggested a causal connexion between the two. The distortion by cravenimage of this possible far fetched idea goes like this:
………………………..
There is nothing “sarcastic” about urging Western women to accept the horror of the Burqa, as Benedict pretends. And no–Muslims do not want women to be immured in the Burqa because Westerners are (supposedly) constantly nude in public. In fact, places where the Burqa and Niqab are most common are places like Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan–these places are not affected by Westerners wearing skimpy clothing.
In fact, immuring women in Purdah in Islam goes back to the “Prophet” himself, and has *nothing* to do with nudist colonies or nude beaches.
Moreover, if Benedict were *really* just concerned about people being “nude” if not wearing the Burqa, then why would he not urge men to wear the Burqa and Niqab, as well? But he does not–he only wants to force this on women. He has been asked about this at least a half dozen times now, by myself and others–but has always sidestepped it. This is because he only wants to victimize women and girls in this manner.
More:
“Benedict has said before that women in the West should wear the Burqa and that girls should be forced to do so–and that they are “naked” if they do not.”
That’s a preposterous and perfidious summation of my comments. We might all disagree about something, but let’s disagree about things expressed and not conjure up straw-men to be knocked down.
………………………..
Note that Benedict says that I am mistaken about his position–but then does not say in what way I am wrong. *Very* telling.
There’s more on his urging Western women to cover up here:
“UN Human Rights Committee says France violated human rights of two Muslimas by fining them for wearing niqab”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/un-human-rights-committee-says-france-violated-human-rights-of-two-muslimas-by-fining-them-for-wearing-niqab#comment-2004234
(from that comment on down)
Until this abominable philosophy [people supposedly regularly going naked in the West–GI] is protested in my country – which it is not – I will delight in seeing Muslim women wearing niqab and will even defend their right to do so and also encourage other women to wear niqab.
Here’s more:
“Algeria: MP calls burqa ban in public sector’“a declared war on Islam'”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/algeria-mp-calls-burqa-ban-in-public-sector-a-declared-war-on-islam#comment-2004807
(from that comment on down)
“I fully sympathizes with a fight against the burqa and niqab in the Muslim world. In the West, however, I suggest they are a justified “divine design” or nemesis designed to expose the hypocrisy in condemning a full-body cloak for women while promoting and allowing vulgar, public nudity for both sexes…”
con’t
gravenimage says
con’t
And here he is, finding no problem with the forced veiling of little girls:
“Hugh Fitzgerald: Mind The Gap, Or Signs of Sanity in France”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/hugh-fitzgerald-mind-the-gap-or-signs-of-sanity-in-france#comment-2005406
(Benedict has other comments on that thread, as well)
This veil-thing is much ado about nothing.
…
Grimly, in the past several months Benedict has only occasionally commented where his is *not* urging free Western women to adopt the hideous Muslim slave rag. Very troubling.
Benedict says
Paul J:
I don’t know who you refer to when you speak about “God”. If it is the God of Genesis it was He himself who made coats of skins and clothed Adam and Eve after their fall, that they could hide their nakedness and thereby be distinguished from mere animals. But I suppose that you don’t know much about this profound story either and its implication for your eternal destiny? Could it be that you yourself is the “savage inbred animal[s]” you accuse Muslims for being?
gravenimage says
Sorry for the double post, above.
gravenimage says
Benedict wrote, replying to Paul J:
Could it be that you yourself is the “savage inbred animal[s]” you accuse Muslims for being?
………………………
Note that Benedict *still* has no problem here with Muslims raping young girls–in fact, he sneers at the idea that this makes them savages.
But he is quick to accuse Paul J of being a savage for condemning this.
carpediadem says
It’s like anything – they pick the young, naive and vulnerable.
abad says
Offhand I’d say its due to the sexually permissive culture of western Europe on the whole, although age 16 is the age of consent in Finland. Since we are talking about a 10 year-old little girl in this case, it could be due to the overall nature of paedophilia in Finland:
https://intmassmedia.com/2017/01/24/a-country-of-thousands-of-pedophiles/
Finally, and to go back in history just a teeny bit – oh say before 9-11 – the liberal elite of the western world – both the United States and western Europe – paedophilia was the champion cause of the liberal elite, what with NAMBLA, “rights of paedophiles”, it being a natural byproduct of sexual deviancy.
Throw into the mix a figure like Mohammad who was a paedophile himself, and the outcome is inevitable. Sure, that sort of thing shocks most decent people, like most JWers.
The bottom line is, where “sexual liberation” exists, expect the most base of its behavior to follow.
gravenimage says
abad, Muslims were raping Infidels–and children–long before “sexual liberation”. This is actually orthodox Islamic behavior, going back to the “Prophet”.
And far from NAMBLA being championed by the liberal elite, it is too fractured to even hold meetings any more. It is estimated to have no more than a handful of members now. Their website does not appear to be active. They have also been disavowed by all major LGBT groups.
Yes, there are problems in the West, no doubt–but widespread support for child rape is *not* among them.
abad says
GravenImage:
What I am saying is that the liberal agenda of sexual liberation provided that nice slippery slope for Islam’s endorsed paedophilia to prosper in the western world.
Don’t forget, prior to 9-11, prior to the fake Syrian Refugees(TM), the business about male Moslem migrants raping non-Moslem little girls was practically unheard of.
gravenimage says
Wherever you find Muslims in any number, you will find Muslims raping children.
Benedict says
Agree! The perversions in the West outdo by far the perversions in the Muslim world, and we don’t even have a holy book to sanction our behavior. The exports from “San Pornando Valley” and other such centers are coming home to roost in the form of Muslims joining the party.
gravenimage says
The increasingly appalling Benedict wrote:
Agree! The perversions in the West outdo by far the perversions in the Muslim world, and we don’t even have a holy book to sanction our behavior. The exports from “San Pornando Valley” and other such centers are coming home to roost in the form of Muslims joining the party.
……………………………
So Benedict believes that making–or just watching–porn is much worse than the perversions of Islam?
I am *no* fan of porn myself, but the idea that the uncoerced actions of consenting adults are more perverted than Muslims engaged in forced marriage, child “marriage”, the rape of Infidels–including children, as here–in Jihad, and sex slavery are not as big an issue as nude beaches is *just morally insane*.
This admission explains a lot–like why Benedict wants to see women and even little girls immured in Burqas. *Ugh*.
And–again–the implication that Muslims are only raping Infidel children because of “Debbie Does Dallas” is grotesquely false–the Muslim rape of children goes back to the very earliest days of Islam, as Benedict must know.
Benedict says
We in the West have sown the wind, and we shall reap the whirlwind.
The demands and judgments upon a Judeo-Christian culture informed by the biblical canon will be much more severe than the judgment upon the Muslim culture and its morality informed by the Islamic canon.
To paraphrase: Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the lands of Mecca and Medina in the day of judgment, than for the Sodom and Gomorrah of Rome, London, New York, San Francisco, Tel Aviv, Brussels, Stockholm and every other city that has despised the testimony of the Bible.
gravenimage says
Yet more from Benedict:
We in the West have sown the wind, and we shall reap the whirlwind.
The demands and judgments upon a Judeo-Christian culture informed by the biblical canon will be much more severe than the judgment upon the Muslim culture and its morality informed by the Islamic canon.
………………………..
In other words, Muslims raping children is not a big deal–it is something that Benedict is fine with winking at.
But Jews and Christians having nude beaches or just failing to wear the Burqa is unforgivable.
Is he saying that God is fine with child rape, but will not suffer women and girls not immured in Burqas–or is this his own judgement? Note that his phrasing is deliberately vague here.
More;
To paraphrase: Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the lands of Mecca and Medina in the day of judgment, than for the Sodom and Gomorrah of Rome, London, New York, San Francisco, Tel Aviv, Brussels, Stockholm and every other city that has despised the testimony of the Bible.
………………………..
It seems that Benedict now actually is styling himself as God–and is saying that this deity has little problem with Muslims abusing and raping women and children, oppressing and slaughtering Infidels–but Jews and Christians not wearing Burqas–which teaching is not in the Bible, as Benedict pretends–had better beware his wrath. Moral insanity…
Dara says
I want to ask the same thing. My Asian parents never let me out of their sight even for a second, except when I was in school. I could not interact with an adult without one of my parents present. I wasn’t even allowed to take public transit by myself until I was 18!
gravenimage says
Finland: Police warn of migrants sexually exploiting young girls, say “I hope this will not result in more racism”
…………………….
And yet, even this is not as bad as those police who either say nothing or even go after those concerned for the victims…
James Lincoln says
Finland is as soft as Sweden. Their political leaders drive the agenda for their police officers.
Can you imagine the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban saying something like this? Or President Trump?
Finland, like Sweden, would rather lose their country that be called “racist”, a term that has lost almost all of its original meaning.
abad says
Markus:
Moslems do not belong in Finland. They can not now nor ever become Finnish.
BTW I read the Kalevala many years ago. Enjoyed it very much.
Peter says
Maybe the “migrants” are racist?
Jay says
Just censor all the news for the next 50 years like UK did, and moslem gang rapes won’t result in any more racism. It will result in the end of your country and culture out of an excess of cowardice and “politeness.” Then you’ll be incarcerating anyone who blows the whistle on these scurvy dogs, just as the UK government has been doing. The cops will keep looking the other way, even as little girls are raped to death then chopped up for kebab to feed their parents when they come looking. That’s how moslems roll.
No Muzzies Here says
So it’s OK to rape the girls? Not OK to condemn it? This is an ignorant person willingly submitting to his new masters.
TrueFreeThinker says
“The police would like to emphasise that not all people with foreign backgrounds are dishonest or criminals” no, in fact none they are all good people because muslimes are from the religion of peace right!?!. “I hope this will not result in more racism” because all of the Fins are so racist and islamaphobic. They are so racist that their country was opened up to mass muslime migration and no attacks are violence against any muslimes has occurred. Keep in mind that the muslimes are racist of Christianaphobic they just need to rape your daughters because their not dressed the right way.
The world has lost its mind……..