Cherif Chekatt reminds Emmanuel Macron that climate change is not the only threat France faces. My latest in FrontPage:
Emmanuel Macron, France’s youthful wunderkind, Europe’s poster child for globalism and socialism, has been absorbed lately with furious protests and riots over a confiscatory new tax he placed on gasoline in order to fight what he thinks of as the greatest threat France and the world face today: climate change. But on Tuesday in Strasbourg, a Muslim named Cherif Chekatt reminded Macron that France faces another threat, one that could prove to be immensely more serious: jihad. Chekatt opened fire at a Christmas market in his native Strasbourg, murdering four and injuring eleven.
As of this writing, Chekatt is on the run, and in a departure from the recent tendency to wave away all such attacks as manifestations of “mental illness” and insist that they’re not terrorism, much less jihad, French authorities are, according to the Telegraph, “treating the attack as a terrorist act. Anti-terrorist prosecutors have opened an investigation.”
In fact, Chekatt was “on a list of ‘security threats,’” France’s “Fiche S” list of people who pose a serious terror threat. RT reported that the regional prefecture announced: “The author of these acts, listed as a security threat, had been sought by police” on Tuesday, but they hadn’t been able to catch up with him before he opened fire. A former London police inspector, Peter Kirkham, explained to RT: “There are so many people that are involved around the edges of this sort of terrorism if this is what it turns out to be, that you can’t keep any sort of meaningful surveillance on them. Even just monitoring the use of communications and social media would be too much.”
And that’s especially true when, like Macron, you don’t want to admit that there is any significant threat at all. But it is also a situation that the Islamic State (ISIS) has been working actively to bring about. As I explain in detail in my book The Complete Infidel’s Guide to ISIS, in 2015 the Islamic State (ISIS) published Black Flags from Rome, detailing its strategy for conquering Europe. It explains how, as the Muslim population of Europe increases, intelligence agencies collect huge amounts of data, “but they will not study it unless you are caught under the radar.” As jihad attacks become more common, law enforcement authorities will not be able to keep up:
As the Western nations get poorer, their intelligence collection agencies will continue to exist, but they simply won’t have enough manpower (less jobs) to analyse it all. With less attacks in the West being group (networked) attacks and an increasing amount of lone-wolf attacks, it will be more difficult for intelligence agencies to stop an increasing amount of violence and chaos from spreading in the West.
As this violence and chaos spreads, Leftist non-Muslim Europeans will help pave the way for the Islamic conquest of Europe, for
a growing population of left-winged [sic] activists (people who are against; human/animal abuses, Zionism, and Austerity measures etc) look upto [sic] the Muslims as a force who are strong enough to fight against the injustices of the world….Many of these people (who are sometimes part of Anonymous and Anarchy movements) will ally with the Muslims to fight against the neo-Nazis’ and rich politicians. They will give intelligence, share weapons and do undercover work for the Muslims to pave the way for the conquest of Rome.
When will this alliance be cemented? When, sooner or later, Leftist protesters realize that taking up arms alongside Muslims is the only viable way of achieving their goals:
If you have ever been at a pro-Palestine / anti-Israel protest, you will see many activists who are not even Muslims who are supportive of what Muslims are calling for (the fall of Zionism). It is most likely here that connections between Muslims and Left-wing activists will be made, and a portion from them will realise that protests are not effective, and that armed combat is the alternative. So they will start to work together in small cells of groups to fight and sabotage against the ‘financial elite’.
Three years later, this plan is working beautifully. And so Cherif Chekatt will fade quickly from the headlines, and the jihad threat will again be downplayed, until the next one. Meanwhile, watch in the coming days for the handwringing establishment media stories about how the local mosque in Strasbourg fears a “backlash,” and that Muslims are the real victims of jihad terror attacks. It always works the same way, like clockwork. That is, until the day that it doesn’t. One day soon the disingenuousness and cynicism of this establishment media propaganda will be obvious to everyone. But by then it will likely be far too late for Emmanuel Macron, and France.
Waltfava says
This disgusting scumbag moslem was on their terror watch list. He’s been arrested 27 TIMES. IN GERMANY,FRANCE AND SWITZERLAND AND SERVED TIME IN GERMANY IN 2016.What a disgrace the French government is.
gravenimage says
He never should have been loose to murder innocent people.
Janiko says
Let me suggest a book “Terrorism and the illuminati” by
Nicholas Livingstone.
Available on pdf.
MT says
Thanks. Have downloaded it, and look forward to reading.
gravenimage says
Thanks for the suggestion, but I find most conspiracy theories about the Illuminati less than useful.
Rufolino says
Isn’t that stating the obvious ? Less obvious because barely admitted in Europe is that the police and anti-terrorist departments simply cannot cope with, let alone track, huge numbers of potential terrorists in their midst.
Islam is winning this slow war of conquest in Europe because of the numbers-game, and the catastrophic demographic changes now taking place everywhere. Except in countries like Poland, which continue to stand up for their own society.
Italy currently doesn’t fit this paradigm, the newly elected Right government keeps saying it is controlling the immigrant situation, and promised to deport “half a million migrants” but this is mostly talk. Few changes have actually happened. So far Italy has been spared big terror-attacks (which will certainly come), though there have been murders…
abad says
He needs to have his passport confiscated, and deported back to his Moslem-majority home nation.
One of the victims was a Thai tourist who died in the attack.
France is slitting its own throat when it comes to tourism. I wonder when they plan on waking up about the issue??
Ernie says
No , ” abad ” , Cheriff Chekatt should lose his head . And that’s literally meant , abad .
Simo Hayha says
“He needs to have his passport confiscated,…..”
Oh, YEAH! THAT ought to work really well. Or NOT! A year or so, in Libya, maybe Iran, I don’t remember, it was reported that HUNDREDS of blank passports had been stolen and it was “assumed” that they were being distributed to muslimes for enabling their travel to European countries. And, it would be fair to also assume that many of the blank documents were sent to European countries to enable wanted criminals to move about between countries. Of course, now with the pea-brained politicians opening their borders, pretty much anyone can move about the continent with ease, spreading terrorism along the way, butchering innocent people, raping women AND children, blowing up cars, mowing down pedestrians with vehicles, etc. Yeah, first you have to FIND this POS, THEN confiscate his passport, THEN tattoo “TERRORIST” in big RED letters on his FOREHEAD PERMANENTLY!
WPM says
He was born in France he is a French citizen by birth ,he was raised to be a Jihadist by family, Mosques , and Jihadist friends. The guilty parties are the appeasing leaders of Western Europe who refuse to crack down on Mosques, hate preachers and Saudi money that pays for the importation and building backing Mosques filling them with hate preachers. Close your borders to the fake refugee army ,deport or jail the inmans who preach violence ,close the Mosques that support Jihad .Stop appeasing Islam report the truth .
gravenimage says
The Jihadist has been killed by French police. Glad to see it.
European pagan says
Death by hanging for all jihadists. Not important which skin colour or gender. I am so sad to hear what happened in Straßburg. This year I visited the city…
Savvy Kafir says
I agree, European pagan. Jihadis in the West (both the successful ones & the bunglers) should be treated as traitors and/or enemy combatants fighting out of uniform. Hanging or a firing squad is the appropriate punishment — as well as a very practical & permanent way to take jihadis out of circulation, without wasting millions of dollars/pounds/Euros to keep these superstition-besotted savages alive in prison, where they can recruit other warriors for Allah.
Some have suggested burying executed jihadis in pig’s blood and offal, which initially struck me as barbaric, disgusting, and totally unnecessary. I just wanted these dangerous Allah junkies dead, as quickly, humanely, & inexpensively as possible, and considered anything more to be in bad form.
But since these idiots are motivated by a desire for a never-ending seventy-three-way in Paradise, burying them in such a manner — which is believed to make Paradise an unlikely destination — might actually have a deterrent effect on other would-be jihadis. Using their (very powerful) superstition against them might be an effective strategy. And if that distasteful but painless method could save the lives & limbs of innocent Europeans, Americans, Canadians, & Australians, we would be stupid and irresponsible not to take advantage of it.
As a bonus, burying dead jihadis in this way would be extremely offensive to Muslims in general — and therefore an excellent way for committed counter-jihadis to show them that we really don’t give a rat’s ass about their precious religious sensibilities. One more way to make them feel unwelcome & unwanted in the West. One more way to motivate Muslims to self-deport, before things get nasty on a really epic scale.
However, as a vegetarian & animal welfare advocate, I would add this important caveat: Only the blood and offal of pigs that have been slaughtered (humanely) to feed the not-so-tenderhearted, bacon-loving types should be used as PSYOP weapons in the war with Islam. Although I’m pretty sure the pigs would be less enthusiastic, I would feel better if their deaths served three purposes — meat, leather, and a kick in the nuts to superstitious jihadis & Muslim colonizers.
abad says
Savvy Kafir:
I hope you are aware that death is what these Jihadis want, handing them Islamic Martyrdom(TM) is not the solution to the problem.
The best solution is for the western world to deport these Moslems back to their homelands after confiscating their passports, shut down all mosques and Islamic centers (they are contrary to western society and values) and keep them contained in the Middle East where they can all kill each other and “Allahu Akhbar” while dong so.
Savvy Kafir says
abad — The jihadis’ yearning for martyrdom is based upon their hope of attaining Paradise. Burying executed jihadis in pigs’ blood would (in their absurd, hocus-pocus worldview) make them ineligible for the celestial cat-house — and that oughta take the shine off the whole martyrdom business.
I agree with you that the best solution is to deport all Muslims to Muslim-majority countries. In fact, I think that’s the ONLY solution that will effectively & permanently safeguard civilized societies. But that day is a long way off, I’m afraid — considering how fast the Islamization of the West is progressing. And there are many strategies & tactics we can employ in the meantime, to slow the spread of the Religion of Peace and begin turning back the tide.
Executing jihadis and dumping them in pigs’ blood would be pretty disgusting, but probably very effective — eliminating terrorists one by one, while also eliminating the motivation for martyrdom … AND serving as a big, bold “F*ck you!” to sensitive Muslims busily revamping the West, using 7th Century Arabia as their model.
Ernie says
Well ” abad “, you’re very friendly to terrorists . Do you like them ?
Rufolino says
“Deport all this Moslems” ? In your dreams !
This is a continent dominated by “political correctness”, and by the (so-called) “International Court of Human Rights”.
Keep dreaming.
gravenimage says
Ernie. abad is *not* pro-terrorist.
And if there were no Jihadists here in the West, we really would be much safer than we are now. First, stop further invasion of the West by Muslims.
Ernie says
I know ” abad ” isn’t pro-jihadist , gravenimage . However , suggesting ( earlier in this comment section ) that it’s recommendable to CONFISCATE THE PASSPORT FROM A MURDERING , WOUNDING and MAIMING TERRORIST and JUST DEPORTING the scum , are very friendly gestures to this terrorist in my humble opinion . ( and dangerously ineffective measures , since the terrorist could just return and start all over again ) .
gravenimage says
Thanks, Ernie. I certainly agree that just confiscating murdering Jihadist’s passports is not exactly stringent measures.
Guy Forester says
Dust off and warm up old sparky.
Greg Murphy says
He’s in Germany by now!
David M says
I heard that on the radio this morning too, they think he is out of the country. He got shot by soldiers, then took a cab & was dropped off in some neighbourhood! Who do the French Police have in charge, Inspector Clouseau?
Greg Murphy says
He ain’t one for PR but was the cab driver threatened or was he moslim as well?
Janiko says
Sadly, the French have alrready surrendered. That was obvious when in Macron’s WW1 fete the muslim moroccans were put in a position of importance next to Melania and Pres.Trump in the center of the front row. The filthy Moroccan potentate grimaced and scowled in disgust when a Christian woman, Melania Trump stood next to him. Did this bloated mslm think he should stand next to Trump. A perfect example of how mslms think they are the best people in the world.
Btw- did you see the photo of Trump glaring at the mslm potentate when he was asleep. That’s a beaut.
Janiko says
He’s probably hiding in Turkey by now. Safe tucked away.
Greg Murphy says
Germany is just as good as Turkey. Needle in a haystack.
Janiko1st@gmail.com says
I think he’s tucked in nice and safe in Molenbeek, or a Dutch no-go zone, possibly Turks in Germany wisked him off to Turkey. He’s North African so he’ll want to be well hidden and cared for by his own people; Moroccans.
gravenimage says
He didn’t leave the country. he was killed in France by French police.
mortimer says
Peaceful Islam strikes again in the CAPITAL of the EUROPEAN UNION … bring more of those JIHADIS IN, Europeans.
There’s never enough jihad in Europe… is there? (sarc/off)
Islam is the GRINCH THAT BANNED CHRISTMAS.
Kessler says
And it almost managed to spread peace in a UK Christmas market but was spoiled by islamophobic police.
On a serious note – been looking at pictures of the Strasburgh jihadi – the prayer bump on his forehead is quite obvious. But I’m sure he is “not religious” according to the media….
Tom S. says
I think the 2nd Amendment invisibly protects most Americans from this kind of violence. First, there are the conceal carry heroes-in-waiting. 2nd, there is the implicit threat of retaliation against this kind of violence in the form of destruction of “religion of peace” propaganda that holds many concerned Americans in abeyance.
Westman says
More important factors may be two oceans and the ME immigrants of the 1960s to late 80s being largely the brain-drain of the brightest minds; the minds least-occluded by Islam.
Anjuli Pandavar says
TS,
It’s not doing very much to stop the takeover of Minnesota, though.
Ric says
Amen, the Islamization of Minnesota.
abad says
Minnesotastan
Savvy Kafir says
I don’t know if the risk of being shot down by armed citizens gives Paradise-yearnin’ jihadis cause to pause or not. But the ability to carry concealed handguns on our persons (and rifles in the trunks of our cars) certainly makes us more able to respond effectively when they do strike.
When an armed civilian who is already on-site responds to a mass shooting, the average number of deaths is 2.5. When there is no one present with a gun when the shooting starts, the average death toll is 18. When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.
DHazard says
Seasons Greetings from the second generation Muslims of Europe:
There will be no happy Christians until everybody, not just the globalists, caves into Islam. Allah hates happy non-Muslims. He wants them all to be disease ridden whores who wallow in misery while raping the world, and don’t get him started about the Jews. There is no good reason to help Muslims that doesn’t end up creating a whole new set of problems namely, a rise in violent crime, spiraling debt to support Muslim immigrants who don’t want to work, constant interruptions to your daily life from spiteful, cradle-to-grave victims, racist rape gangs, vehicular homicide, rampant misogyny, and general hatred and distrust of non-Muslims. And talking about all of this is now a crime.
It’s so obvious. There will never be a healthy multicultural society where Islam and Muslims are anything more than a sliver of the culture they wish to replace.
gravenimage says
Robert Spencer in FrontPage: Jihad in Strasbourg
……………….
Just chilling.
Max says
Emmanuel Macron pretended to be a political centrist, but it didn’t take long for him to show his true colours. He is and will always be a Merkel boy. He thought that everybody in France is an elite that would gladly accept any additional economic burden for the sake of the global warming religion and the importation of Muslims. Macron, like Merkel, will soon be discarded.
Terry Gain says
Both Trump and Pompeo referred to the Strasbourg attacks as a reason to support the border wall (which is very much needed). Perhaps someone might tell them the attacker was born in France. Yes, illegal immigration is a problem but the bigger problem is legal Muslim immigration.
Older Canadian says
Yes, as Toronto found out in July this year with the Danforth shooting.
Janiko says
Right the hell on. You nailed it !
JayT says
JW is way overdue for a poll on this site (the ones where you click the button next to the name choice) to determine by popularity which leader has the tightest grip on the opiate pipe:
Justin Trudeau
Angela Merkel
Pope Francis
Teresa May
Emmanuel Macron
Terry Gain says
Can I vote All Of The Above. Or, what does it matter, they are all nuts. And dangerous.
Guy Forester says
I do not know what is in that hubbly bubbly, but it must be reeeeel gooood!
shortfattexan says
“Dhimmi of the Year”. Yes, That used to be a feature of the old Dhimmi Watch web site. Mr. Spencer should bring that feature back on Jihad Watch.
gravenimage says
Yes–I miss that feature, as well. Typically we’d be voting on that this time of year.
Wellington says
Another on point article by Robert Spencer (almost an uncountable number by now). Many excellent comments too by those who have posted on this thread to date.
Here’s my two cents worth for what it is worth (which I indulge myself by thinking that it is a very important “two-cents worth”—but I certainly and surely self-promotingly digress) and it is as follows:
Islam sucks. There’s no use pretending otherwise. Islam is simply awful and the only effective approach to dealing with this major aberration by mankind is to call it out for the heinous, horrible, horrendous (just love alliteration at times even though not done all that well, for instance ineptly by me) totalitarian and freedom-crushing religious ideology which it surely is.
Attempting here to be as serious as I can be, this is the crux of the matter:
Until Islam is treated as iniquitous, all of it, ALL OF IT, you can forget any winning strategy against the worst religion ever created by man. Yes, start in any way by trying to save any part of this religion and immediately you are in error, only the degree functioning as a variable (ditto for other major ideological aberrations like Marxism, Nazism and anarchism).
Anyone doubting me here in this admittedly harsh assessment of Islam, well then, go ahead and tell me, and what I have rhetorically asked many times before here at JW, a SINGLE aspect of goodness about Islam that can’t be found elsewhere—all the while taking into account all the rot in Islam (e.g., death for apostasy) that is deuce difficult to find in the theological blueprint of any other major religion. Thus, at best, Islam is superfluous (and this is being too kind I would contend), so why keep it around at all?
Again, I rest my case.
Terry Gain says
Islam will not be declared iniquitous until it is agreed that it is not a religion. It is a satanic death cult.
Wellington says
Nah, Terry. Satanism is iniquitous, is a “satanic death cult” too and yet it is a religion for First Amendment purposes. The problem is not the “not a religion.” Rather it is the improper characterization of what Islam is. By all means, it should be a protected religion, but by all means it should be widely assessed as an evil religion, just as Satanism is.
I strongly suspect the main reason why the evil religion which is Islam has not been properly characterized is that it is simply deemed by way too many as too big to fail. If there were only 1.5 million Muslims worldwide instead of 1.5 billion Muslims worldwide, it would still have First Amendment protection here in the US as a religion (just like Satanism) but it would be ridiculed, lambasted and largely ignored.
The problem is the size, proving that sometimes size really does matter—and the First Amendment has nothing in it which allows a very small evil religion, e.g., Satanism, to be protected but not a very large evil religion, i.e., Islam.
You see, gigantic evil can take advantage of freedom in a way that is inimical to society as a whole that no small evil really can. This is the problem and the solution is not banning but exposure, not treating it as not a religion, but rather as a malevolent religion. Once this would occur, everything else will start to fall into place.
Terry Gain says
Islam will prevail so long as good people concede that it is a religion.
revereridesagain says
Satanism is a bunch of idiots worshiping the opposite of someone else’s god. Islam is a bunch of idiots worshiping an evil god and calling everyone who denies it a tool of Satan, who is the opposite of the god the people they call “infidels” worship, but which is what the Satanists worship. We should get these people together and watch them debate themselves up each other’s rear ends.
Wellington says
Islam will prevail so long as it is portrayed as something good.
thebigW says
What Wellington can’t see is that even if all of us finally agree Islam’s horrible, over a billion (probably 2 billion before this century’s out) Muslims will continue to support Islam as the best thing since sliced cheese. Then what’ll we do about it?
Wellington says
thebigW: Are you for real? Can you really be as stupid as your 2:18 P.M. post seems to indicate?
My God, man, can’t you even comprehend that if all non-Muslims would agree that Islam is horrible, that this would invoke a sea-change respecting immigration, laws, social attitudes, the death of much political correctness, idiotic multiculturalism, etc.?
Yes, the problem of huge numbers of Muslims would still remain but we shall have turned the corner of corners in confronting this by recognizing that Islam is rotten.
What, if “all” non-Muslims agree that Islam is a giant negative, this still makes little to no difference, per your pathetic post? It would be the most important of steps in confronting what Islam intends for us all and you are utterly blind to this.
Truly, I have come across many stupid statements by others in the ten years I have been posting here at JW. Your 2:18 P.M. post above is one of the stupidest, most inane, and intellectually bankrupt posts I have ever read.
Just imagine all of the West as dedicated to the proposition that Islam is rotten and we should thereafter act accordingly as certain Eastern European leaders like Orban and Szydlo have articulated. It would still make no difference because there are so many Muslims?
By your logic, since there were one to two billion Communists during the Cold War, recognizing Marxism as a totalitarian, ideological evil would not have mattered much since there were so many Communists. I am simply stunned by the bankruptcy of your thought pattern. Wake the hell up.
gravenimage says
Yes–if all Infidels recognized the threat of Islam we would be in a *much* better position to oppose it, no matter how fervent the Mohammedans might be.
thebigW says
Well obviously it would help for all non-Muslims to see how bad Islam is, but what would that mean in terms of ACTION? By the time the non-Muslims of the world get around to seeing the obvious, there will be like 50 million more Muslims inside the West and it will be too late to do anything but survive like the Walking Dead people..
Savvy Kafir says
Islam is definitely a religion, based upon superstition & mythology — like all the rest. It’s a religion that offers the promise of Paradise for the faithful in the (non-existent) afterlife, and the threat of a (non-existent) hell for nonbelievers. It’s a racket selling an invisible product to the credulous, so it’s obviously a religion.
But Islam is ALSO a (barbaric) legal system and a political system that promotes aggressive, imperialistic warfare, with the aim of creating a world governed by Islam. That’s what makes it unique, and uniquely problematic — along with the hatred for nonbelievers that is the central theme of the Muslim holy book.
But, even though Islam is a religion (among other things), it can be, and should be banned throughout the free world. Islam is inherently incompatible with democracy, human rights, & basic freedoms. It is inherently & uniquely threatening to civilized societies; therefore it must be treated differently. We must make an exception with Islam. It cannot be protected by law, as if it were only a religion. In the U.S., the 1st Amendment will have to be amended, taking into account the unique threat that Islam poses.
Some of the Founding Fathers were well aware of the true nature of Islam. But I’m sure they never imagined that some day millions of Muslims would be allowed to immigrate to America and begin the process of undermining free speech & freedom of the press, and imposing their barbaric values on the rest of us. Those Islam-savvy, liberty-loving founders would have considered that sort of “tolerance” too idiotic and suicidal for Americans to ever contemplate.
gravenimage says
+1
thebigW says
“so why keep it around at all?”
What if ove a billion people disagree and they keep it around? You think over a billion Muslims are going to agree with you on that?
Wellington says
No. I was just engaging in a rhetorical question based on the fact that there is nothing good in Islam that can’t be found elsewhere but much rot in it that is exceedingly difficult to find anywhere else. Hey, whatever it takes to bring negative attention to Islam.
Norman Moffatt says
Some Aussie humour: Subject: Hello: RETIREMENT At The RED LIGHT
If his offends anybody, personally I don’t give a proverbial !, jackson T firefly.
I was sitting at a long stop light yesterday, thinking about what I would do to keep busy during retirement, minding my own business and patiently waiting for the light to turn green, even though there was no on-coming traffic.
An old Nissan full of bearded, young, loud Muslims, shouting anti-Australian slogans, with a half-burned Australian Flag duct-taped on the boot of their
car, stopped next to me.
Suddenly they yelled, “Allah Akbar! Praise Allah! Death to Australia” and took off before the light changed. Out of nowhere, an 18-wheeler truck came speeding through the intersection and ran directly over their car, crushing
it completely and killing everyone in it.
For several minutes I sat in my car thinking to myself, “Man, that could have been me!”
So today, bright and early, I went out and got a job as a truck driver!
Greg Murphy says
LOL!
gravenimage says
🙂
revereridesagain says
Crikey! I’m passing that one along.
Guy Forester says
That is great! Where do I go to get that job?
Guy Forester says
“When will this alliance be cemented?”
Unfortunately, that alliance was cemented at least 5 decades ago, if not more. All you need to know is who trained the likes of Yasser Arafat and Muginiyah.
When it became obvious to the Soviets that Israel was not going to be a communist satellite, and instead became a beacon of freedom and hope (albeit a rather socialized one) in the midst of despotic tyrannies, the left joining another tyranny to bring down the west was done.
All you need to know is who funded and trained the military rulers of such bastions of freedom such as Egypt and Syria. The list is long.
This gets us to the present day. Who is supporting Pakistan and DPRK? Who is working with Iran to build nukes and ICBM’s? Who is cuddling up to Turkey and Syria? Putin is KGB and just as left as anyone. The difference is, he has a better suit and haircut than Khrushchev or fat boy.
Joe says
Who took out Saddam Hussein, Colonel Gaddafi, Mullah Omar, and many others? When these tyrants were eliminated by the American government, terrorists such as ISIS and Al Qaeda took over. These were not the same mistake made in so many places.
For example, Al Qaeda was started by the CIA. The idea that a college student, Osama bin Laden, could go to school during the week, fight in Afghanistan on weekends, and in his spare time maintain a list of 40,000 likely terrorists across the world is not realistic. The list, by itself, would require more than 20 people who were highly trained.
When ISIS was started, they exclusively used US military equipment that was provided by “fleeing” Iraq Army. ISIS marched in an open column along the road while it gathered this equipment. One plane strafing that column would have eliminated ISIS.
After the US provided the terrorists with this new empire across the Arab Crescent, the mass migration to Europe started, and the European leaders were all for it.
Islam did not win these victories by itself.
Wellington says
You fight the battle du jour. America aligned with Stalin during WWII to defeat Hitler. That this gave Stalin great power in Eastern Europe afterwards does not invalidate aligning with him against Adolf. Ditto for supporting Muslim groups in the 1980’s against Soviets in Afghanistan.
As for Saddam Hussein, he invaded a sovereign nation (Kuwait) and not doing anything against this would have sent world markets out of control long term as well as condoning the rape of a country. Thereafter, SH did not abide by the 1991 truce terms (e.g., firing daily upon British and American jets patrolling the two no-fly zones over Iraq and giving every impression to every major intelligence agency on the planet that he had not come clean on WMDs) and was slaughtering his own people, even giving sanctuary to a Muslim enemy (Zarqawi). America after 9/11 had to take out SH but should have installed a non-psycho authoritarian from the Iraqi military in his place instead of trying to implant democracy in that Godforsaken country.
Yes, America has made mistakes, but you seem to belong to the “kick America first” school of thinking. Remember, America was the decisive factor in WWI (the German general staff said as much), in WWII and the Cold War. Just because much of the world is screwed up, which it surely is, shouldn’t translate into faulting America as much as you have.
gravenimage says
Ah…right. Another claim that Jihad is actually the “filthy Infidels”.
infidel says
In a LANDMARK judgement, an Indian High Court said that India should have been declared as a Hindu state after Muslims treacherously created Pakistan and Bangladesh out of its soil in 1947.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/after-partition-india-should-have-become-hindu-state-observes-hc-judge/articleshow/67068049.cms
Max says
How many people have died due to global warming? Very few if any at all.
How many people have died by the hand of radical Muslims? At least 100,000.
Macron’s priorities, like all of those on the left, are futile.
Tim Gibson says
I refuse to use adjectives like ‘radical’ or ‘extremist’. These are just muslims.
Max says
I take your point. The Quran makes them all radicals.
Tim Gibson says
As the Western nations get poorer, their intelligence collection agencies will continue to exist, but they simply won’t have enough manpower (less jobs) to analyse it all. With less attacks in the West being group (networked) attacks and an increasing amount of lone-wolf attacks, it will be more difficult for intelligence agencies to stop an increasing amount of violence and chaos from spreading in the West.
Congress will fund the NSA forever.
shortfattexan says
Everyone has their own suggestion for a solution, and every solution has a dozen people pointing out reasons why it won’t work.
But here’s a suggestion that everyone should be able to agree on: if an immigrant commits a crime more serious than a speeding ticket, they should be sent home. Period. That by itself would not completely solve the problem, but it would most definitely be an improvement. A whole lot of recent deaths could have been avoided if Western countries had been following that simple rule.
Of course, if we were to stop letting the f***ers into our countries to begin with, that would be even better, but that’s just wishful thinking.
gravenimage says
Agreed.
Logic&Reason says
The “Je suis….” platitudes mean very little…and cost nothing….perfect for the wilfully ignorant virtue-signaller. It sweeps the murders under the prayer rug, stops further investigation, and puts the victim focus on the entire Muslim community. Playing perfectly into the Islamists’ hands.
“Je suis fatigué du mandat terroriste scripturaire de l’islam.”
Jasnan says
It is sad to know infidels don’t know the reason why mohammedian Muslims hate the west, to kill some one unknown to you need to hate their culture group, race… Etc.
Why Muslims hate the west
1. Right from childhood they are taught the infidel west are disgusting, commit dirty acts like homosexuality, adultery, ,drink alcohol, mock the stupidity of Islam…..all of these are criminal acts under Islamic law and recently they added a new propaganda, the west killed lot of Muslims( as though Muslims never killed anyone including their own)…etc …..in short the west are evil who support
Allah forbidden criminal acts.
2. Since childhood they segregate women and the male are guardian of women’s virginity and modesty ( wearing hijab, fully covered clothing, never never ever date, Mary, love , befriended infidel ) , in the Mohammedan’s eyes western women cheap, whores,sluts who are no more than sexual slaves, the Mohammedan in Europe despite western women and hate them if they don’t sleep with them, only Mohammedans commit gang rapes of infidel women, and children.
This hatred and disgusting feeling towards infidel makes them kill them, …… When they see successful hardworking infidel their hatred increases and he kills them….
Max says
If their women are “pure”, then why do they practice female genital mutilation? Is it that they are not so “pure’ after all?