• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Robert Spencer in PJ Media: New York Times Celebrates Muhammad as ‘Paragon of Compassion’

Dec 1, 2018 10:33 am By Robert Spencer

Seventh century fake news from a cynical and deceptive propagandist. My latest in PJ Media:

“Happy Birthday, Muhammad,” the New York Times proclaimed happily last Tuesday in a propaganda piece by Haroon Moghul, the author of a book confidently entitled How to Be a Muslim. I’d say it was a new low for the Times if the Gray Lady didn’t keep stooping lower every day.

Moghul details how he rediscovered Muhammad during a time of doubt, marveling “that he buried the least loved of his fellow Arabs with his own hands. That he put two of his fingers together and promised that he and the orphan would be that close in the life to come. That he so loved the vulnerable that God loved him in turn.”

Laying it on even thicker, Moghul continues: “He was an outsider like me. Being an orphan from age 6 in a very patrilineal, very patriarchal and very tribal society must have been a social death sentence. Muhammad could have reacted by seething with resentment and lashing out at the world. He could have turned on himself. Instead he became a paragon of compassion.”

Why should we believe Moghul? Because he knows: “I’d memorized Muhammad’s life story in Sunday school, cramming facts, dates, lineages into my head as if I was preparing for an A.P. exam, a good Muslim like my parents wanted me to be.”

If that is true, then Moghul knows that what he has published in the New York Times is false from beginning to end.

Here are a few statements attributed to Muhammad in sources that are considered reliable by Islamic scholars and normative for Islamic law, as recorded in The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS (in which the source for each is noted):

“I have been made victorious through terror.”

“Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war. … When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. … If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them.”

“I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was guaranteed the protection of his property and life on my behalf except for the right affairs rest with Allah.”

“May Allah curse the Jews and Christians for they built the places of worship at the graves of their Prophets.”

“I looked into Paradise and I saw that the majority of its people were the poor. And I looked into Hell and I saw that the majority of its people are women.”

When asked about this, he explained: “I was shown Hell and I have never seen anything more terrifying than it. And I saw that the majority of its people are women.” They said, “Why, O Messenger of Allah?” He said, “Because of their ingratitude (kufr).” It was said, “Are they ungrateful to Allah?” He said, “They are ungrateful to their companions (husbands) and ungrateful for good treatment. If you are kind to one of them for a lifetime then she sees one (undesirable) thing in you, she will say, ‘I have never had anything good from you.’”

Moghul doubtlessly knows about such passages and many more. But he doesn’t bother to reveal them to his New York Times audience, even to explain them away. Now, why is that?

There are other passages in the earliest Islamic sources in which this paragon of compassion orders the murders of people who have insulted him. These include Abu Afak, who was over one hundred years old, and the poetess Asma bint Marwan. Abu Afak was killed in his sleep, in response to Muhammad’s question, “Who will avenge me on this scoundrel?” Similarly, Muhammad on another occasion cried out, “Will no one rid me of this daughter of Marwan?” One of his followers, Umayr ibn Adi, went to her house that night, where he found her sleeping next to her children. The youngest, a nursing babe, was in her arms. But that didn’t stop Umayr from murdering her and the baby as well. Muhammad commended him: “You have done a great service to Allah and His Messenger, Umayr!”

Then there was Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf. Muhammad asked: “Who is willing to kill Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?” One of the Muslims, Muhammad bin Maslama, answered, “O Allah’s Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?” When Muhammad said that he would, Muhammad bin Maslama said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab).” Muhammad responded: “You may say it.” Muhammad bin Maslama duly lied to Ka’b, luring him into his trap, and murdered him.

Moghul claims that Muhammad “was forced to take up arms, time and again, to defend his faith, his community, and himself.” But in reality, the vast majority of battles that Muhammad fought in were offensive, and after his death, his followers, emulating him, attacked and conquered the Middle East, North Africa, Persia, Spain, and much of India with astonishing rapidity. None of this was defensive warfare.

Just consider: Muhammad began waging violent jihad in Medina, one city of Arabia. By the time of his death he was master of all Arabia. That’s a most impressive defensive action! And likewise, when he is supposed to have died, in 632, the Muslims controlled only Arabia. By 100 years later, in 732, their empire stretched from Spain all across North Africa and the Middle East to Persia and India.

They defended themselves all the way to conquering nearly half of the known world? Pull my other leg.

Yet Moghul continues: “When terrorists struck New York and Washington in 2001 I was horrified, scared and bewildered. The Muhammad I revered bore no resemblance to the Muhammad they claimed. In their view, Muhammad was a conqueror first, a politician and a general second, and a man of faith last, and least.”

9/11 was hardly the first act of violence committed by Muslims acting in the name of Islam and in accord with its teachings. The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS demonstrates from Islamic sources that violent jihad has been a constant of Islamic history. If Moghul is to be believed, then Muslims for 1,400 years, everywhere Muslims have gone, have misunderstood Islam and outraged the memory of Muhammad. And this mass apostasy took place at the very top, as the violent jihad was led by the caliphs and other Muslim rulers who were, by their own accounts, endeavoring to emulate Muhammad and put his teachings into practice.

Moghul even claims that when Muhammad emigrated to Medina, “he pledged that the Muslim community would defend the native Jewish community from any of its enemies, and declared Medina to be one nation of two faiths, a profound and unusual gesture of pluralism and tolerance.”

Moghul doesn’t tell you what happened next: Muhammad exiled two of the three Jewish tribes of Medina, and massacred the third. Then he went to the oasis of Khaybar, where the two Jewish tribes he exiled had gone from Medina, and massacred them. On his deathbed, he vowed to expel all Jews, as well as Christians, from Arabia.

Haroon Moghul almost certainly knows that what I am writing here is all true. He will take no notice of this article, of course, and will hope that you won’t see it, because the question arises inevitably: what does Moghul make of the abundance of material, only some of which have I quoted above, found in canonical Islamic texts, that contradicts his picture of Muhammad? Why doesn’t he discuss this material and offer some explanation for it? Or is he just hoping that we don’t know about it, and that his vilification of those who point it out as “Islamophobes” will suffice for his readers to dismiss it?…

Read the rest here.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, journalistic bias, Muhammad, Robert Spencer Tagged With: Haroon Moghul, New York Times


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. JIMBO says

    Dec 1, 2018 at 10:46 am

    What can one expect of the NYT when they denied the Holocaust even as it was happening?

    • Mac-101 says

      Dec 1, 2018 at 11:42 am

      I read a SOROS holdin company bought a lot of NYT stock and that Carlos Slim was still the major holder of the stock.
      .
      From Wikipedia:
      .
      Although Slim is the largest shareholder in the company, his investment does not give him the ability to control the newspaper, as his stake allows him to vote only for Class A directors, who compose just a third of the company’s board.[29] According to the company’s 2016 annual filings, Slim did not own any of the company’s Class B shares.[32]
      .
      At the April 2005 board meeting, Class B shareholders elected nine of the fourteen directors of the company.[35]
      .
      .
      Chairman of the Board
      Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr.
      Executives
      Mark Thompson (President and CEO) Dean Baquet James Bennet Meredith Kopit Levien Arthur Gregg Sulzberger Joseph Kahn
      .
      So the Class B stock holders are still in charge, meaning the Ochs-Sulzberger Familia?
      .
      Why does it seem every couple weeks THEY publish an article supporting Islam and the cost of Western civilization? WHY????
      .
      Comments respectfully requested!

      • Andy says

        Dec 1, 2018 at 12:28 pm

        God Raises Up Kings or Nations and Removes Them

        https://www.wake-up.org/morality/god-raises-up-kings-or-nations-and-removes-them-larry-w-wilson.html

        • Andy says

          Dec 2, 2018 at 11:48 am

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZbVIniun_E

          https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/give-alex-jones-press-credentials-and-sit-him-next-jim-acosta

          The Great Replacement

      • Max says

        Dec 1, 2018 at 9:46 pm

        Whatever Soros can control the NYT or not, makes little difference. The NYT cannot possibly shift any further to the left that it already is.

        • Mac-101 says

          Dec 2, 2018 at 12:02 am

          Very True. However if Soros owns Class A stock and the Ochs-Sulzberger Familia owns most of the Class B stock which controls the company. Then the Ochs-Sulzberger Familia controlling the NYT not only ignored the Holocaust but now is assisting the Islamification of the Western World. WHY????

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 2, 2018 at 12:51 am

          The NYT also denied and whitewashed Stalin’s starving of his people, especially the Ukrainians. Just appalling.

        • Mac-101 says

          Dec 2, 2018 at 1:08 am

          GI, Exactly. And the real crime is that in the past the NYT pretty much lead the country on what was to be covered in the news. Not sure of their impact now in the digital age. The NYTs has been a tool of Satan for 75+ years!

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 2, 2018 at 1:39 am

          They do have an ugly history, Mac.

      • Mac-101 says

        Dec 2, 2018 at 9:23 am

        To be fair I thought I’d look up the Present leadership. I remembered about one had become a Episcopalian. So it was even better than that. They went from devout Jews to nominal Jews to Episcopalian to agnostic and some articles claim Atheist. I just made this up, but I wouldn’t even doubt Wiccan/Mother Earth/Satanic. Basically it is THE American Tale of the sheading of Religion, the abandonment of G-d and believing in the superiority of MAN.
        .
        Did you see the connection between Podesta’s “Spirit Cooking” artist and Satanism. Extract from comment below:
        .
        “Madame Blavatsky helped to found “Lucifer” magazine in London in 1888. The “god” of her books “Isis Unveiled” and “The Secret Doctrine” is Lucifer. Lucifer is the former name of Satan. Blavatsky was most definitely a Satanist. Abramovic says Blavatsky is one of her “favorites”, according to this article.
        .
        If not please review it at;
        .
        https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/11/uk-from-appeasement-to-collusion-part-1-the-church-of-england#comments
        .
        My comment on 19 Nov 8:46 on the above article.

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 2, 2018 at 3:25 pm

          Mac, “artist” Marina Abramović is an idiot, but she is not sacrificing children.

        • Mac-101 says

          Dec 2, 2018 at 4:00 pm

          True, but embracing the dark forces. ALL religions have evil forces in them. She got boue coup money from the Clintons and Podesta! These people are ALL PURE Evil!

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 2, 2018 at 11:16 pm

          I have never seen that Marina Abramović has been funded by Podesta or the Clintons. Do you have any links?

          I think most of her money comes from art awards.

        • Mac-101 says

          Dec 3, 2018 at 10:07 am

          Wife’s in ICU right now. But if you research her grants you’ll see a couple positive written articles about her receiving funding from the Clinton Crime Foundation and correspondence from Podesta as a Clinton go between. Perhaps around 2012, Just a guess. Then there are some negative ones about her something like 1 to 2 million dollar grants she squandered unethically or ineptly.

    • mortimer says

      Dec 1, 2018 at 11:18 pm

      The character attributed to Muhammad in the biography of Ibn Ishaq is exceedingly unfavorable. In order to gain his ends he recoils from no expedient, and he approves of similar unscrupulousness on the part of his adherents, when exercised in his interest. He profits to the utmost from the chivalry of the Meccans, but rarely requites it with the like. He organizes assassinations and whole-sale massacres. His career as tyrant of Medina is that of a robber chief, whose political economy consists in securing and dividing plunder, the distribution of the latter being at times carried out on principles which fail to satisfy his followers’ ideas of justice. He is himself an unbridled libertine and encourages the same passion in his followers. For whatever he does he is prepared to plead the express authorization of the deity. It is, however, impossible to find any doctrine which he is not prepared to abandon in order to secure a political end. At different points in his career he abandons the unity of God and his claim to the title of Prophet. This is a disagreeable picture for the founder of a religion, and it cannot be pleaded that it is a picture drawn by an enemy; and though Ibn Ishaq’s name was for some reason held in low esteem by the classical traditionalists of the third Islamic century, they make no attempt to discredit those portions of the biography which bear hardest on the character of their Prophet.
      (Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, volume 8, p. 878.Dr. Margiolouth)

      • gravenimage says

        Dec 2, 2018 at 12:53 am

        Good post, Mortimer.

    • BC says

      Dec 2, 2018 at 6:01 am

      Nonie Darwish also was taught about Moham and Islam at school but if you read any of her wonderful; books you will see she has quite a different interpretation of what she was taught

      • gravenimage says

        Dec 2, 2018 at 3:25 pm

        Yes–she is actually being honest.

  2. Rob says

    Dec 1, 2018 at 10:50 am

    Surprisingly, the NYTs allowed comments on this piece. I read with great relief the many comments pointing out the lies, distortions and complete nonsense in piece, pointed out with many facts pertaining to islam, Islamic history and the “truths” told about mohammade and his life in the Islamic foundational texts.

    This suggests to me that the long, hard work done by Mr. Spencer and others is having a big and important impact countering the big, until now seldom challenged, lie that is islam.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 2, 2018 at 1:01 am

      Unfortunately, most of the ones I saw swallowed this bs hook, line, and sinker.

      • gravenimage says

        Dec 2, 2018 at 3:27 pm

        Oh–I see those were comments the NYT was recommending. Comments in general are more of a mixed bag–some are quite heartening.

  3. Peter Buckley says

    Dec 1, 2018 at 11:18 am

    The simple answer to all this denial about the reality of Muhammad’s life is simply to link the reader to Muhammad’s biography, now available online.

    Thanks to the Internet, everyone can now read online the first biography of Muhammad, by the devout muslim Ibn Ishaq:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Ishaq

    If you read the biography, you will understand why so-called “extremists” do what they do (they are copying Muhammad), and why so many muslims are leaving Islam now they are finding out the truth.

    Muhammad orders his son-in-law Ali, to behead Al-Nadr bin al-Harith on page 136.
    Muhammad says that those who follow him will be given paradise; those who refuse will be slaughtered and sent to hell on page 222
    Muhammad approves the stabbing of Uqba bin Abu Muayt on page 308.
    Muhammad arranges the beheading of Kab bin al-Ashraf on page 364-9.
    Muhammad personally beheads over 600 Jewish prisoners of war on page 464
    Muhammad orders the torturing of treasurer of Khaybar tribe, Kinana on page 515
    Muhammad orders the killing of Abdullah bin Katal’s and one of his singing-girls on page 550-1
    Muhammad approves the murder of Asma bint Marwan on page 675-6.
    Muhammad arranges the assassination of the old man Abu Afak on page 675.
    Muhammad approves the murder of an old one-eyed Bedouin man, by Amr bin Umayya, one of his Jihadist thugs on page 674-5.

    http://www.justislam.co.uk/images/Ibn%20Ishaq%20-%20Sirat%20Rasul%20Allah.pdf

    JW readers can copy and paste the above. No “insults” are necessary, either to Muhammad or muslims. Just the facts, as described above.Thank you.

    • Terry Gain says

      Dec 1, 2018 at 5:16 pm

      Peter Buckley

      Thanks for the summary.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 2, 2018 at 1:02 am

      +1

  4. LytchZam says

    Dec 1, 2018 at 11:30 am

    Here! Here!

  5. Diane Harvey says

    Dec 1, 2018 at 11:33 am

    I went to the comments of the NYT for this piece of foolishness.

    NYT Picks are just as you would expect of propagandists.

    Readers’ Picks slightly better. They were a few who knew the history and character of Big Mo.

  6. unbeliever1 says

    Dec 1, 2018 at 12:08 pm

    Here is a case of that “compassion” meted out to a family in Australia by a quiet, shy Bangladeshi “student” who was taken in by a caring family. After being in the country for 8 days, she showed her true intention. She revealed after trying to kill her host that she came for jihad and not to study.

    http://www.danielpipes.org/18595/melbourne-petite-shy-honors-student-jihadi?utm_source=Middle+East+Forum&utm_campaign=e34533f735-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_12_01_01_17&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_086cfd423c-e34533f735-33806397

  7. Jedothek says

    Dec 1, 2018 at 12:28 pm

    Another way in which the press engages in pro-Islamic propaganda is the common reference to “the Prophet Muhammad,” with or without the first P upper case. This very controversially implies half the Islamic creed by saying that Muhammad was a prophet. If one needed to distinguish this Muhammad from the many others, one might say “Muhammad, the founder of Islam” ( though I should admit that some Muslims would object to this, saying that the first Muslim was Adam: I leave it to the reader to judge which is the more objective identification, “Prophet” or “founder of Islam”).

    Similarly , in the secular press Amos, Isaiah etc. should be called “the Prophet Amos” etc. only when it is necessary to distinguish them from others of the same name.

  8. Norger says

    Dec 1, 2018 at 2:51 pm

    “Or is he just hoping that we don’t know about it, and that his vilification of those who point it out as “Islamophobes” will suffice for his readers to dismiss it?…”

    This strategy has actually worked remarkably well, in large part because our politicians and MSM insist on playing “see no evil” when it comes to Islam.

  9. Indiana Tom says

    Dec 1, 2018 at 6:09 pm

    Tripping the light fantastic I see.

  10. Max says

    Dec 1, 2018 at 9:40 pm

    Muhammad was such a ‘Paragon of Compassion’, that he had sex with a minor (13yo girl), who had no say whatsoever about what Muslims called marriage.

    • Jean (old) says

      Dec 2, 2018 at 4:22 am

      Max.

      Aisha was only six (perhaps even five, as they then reckoned by moon years, which are shorter) when she was handed over to the 55-year old Muhammad.

      He had penetrative sex with her when she was nine, but did other sexual things with her before that (using her thighs as a substitute vagina) – i.e. presumably from age six.

      Just after marrying the old monster, Aisha is recorded to have become seriously ill. All her hair fell out, which is a sign of extreme stress.

      This is in a hadith written by Aisha herself. She also describes that not only did she not have any say – she wasn’t even told up front by her parents that she had been ‘married’. She had to deduce it as the events unfolded.

      Worst jump scare in history.

  11. gary fouse says

    Dec 1, 2018 at 10:24 pm

    NY Times headline:

    “Titanic arrives New York”

  12. mortimer says

    Dec 1, 2018 at 11:30 pm

    A PARAGON OF OPPORTUNISM! A PARAGON OF DUPLICITY!

    One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammad’s life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives and their “right hand possessions” (Quran 33:50) He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way. Muhammad was a narcissist like Hitler, Saddam or Stalin. He was astute and knew how to manipulate people, but his emotional intelligence was less evolved than that of a 6-year-old child. He simply could not feel the pain of others. He brutally massacred thousands of innocent people and pillaged their wealth. His ambitions were big and as a narcissist, he honestly believed he is entitled to do as he pleased and commit all sorts of crimes and his evil deeds are justified.

    Islam stands or falls on Muhammad. He is the religion’s sole prophet, Islam’s solitary example, Allah’s lone conduit. Without Muhammad, Allah, the Qur’an, and Islam would be unknown. Yet the picture the Islamic scriptures paint of this man is not flattering. According to the Qur’an and Hadiths, Muhammad was a thief, rapist, and terrorist. The Sira, or Biography, compiled by Ibn Ishaq, provides the only written account of this man, his god, place and religion within two centuries of his death. There is no other valid source from which Muhammad can be seen, or Islam can be interpreted. The depiction of the prophet by the most revered Muslim sources reveals behavior that is immoral, criminal, and violent. The five oldest and most trusted Islamic sources don’t portray Muhammad as a great and godly man. They confirm that he was a thief, liar, assassin, mass murderer, terrorist, warmonger, and an unrestrained sexual pervert engaged in pedophilia, incest, and rape. He authorized deception, assassinations, torture, slavery, and genocide. This was a pirate, not a prophet. According to the Hadith and the Qur’an, Muhammad and his henchmen plundered their way to power and prosperity. By putting the Qur’an in chronological order and correlating it with the context of Muhammad’s life, we find that Allah mirrored his prophet’s character. Muhammad’s god condoned immoral and criminal behavior. Allah boasts about being a terrorist. He claims to have deceived men, to have stolen their property, to have enslaved women and children, to having committed acts of murder, genocide, and sadistic tortures. If you are a Muslim reading the words of the Sira, you should be horrified, appalled and ashamed of Muhammad and the clerics after him who have purposely deceived you. The evidence of this criminal, amoral character is overwhelming and undeniable in the oldest documents of Islam. Muhammad’s character proves he was not a valid prophet.

    • Mac-101 says

      Dec 2, 2018 at 12:24 am

      So true. I have no respect for any person who has read the Quran, Hadiths and Sira and remains a Muslim! Mohammad was sheer Evil according to their own works!

  13. gravenimage says

    Dec 2, 2018 at 12:48 am

    Robert Spencer in PJ Media: New York Times Celebrates Muhammad as ‘Paragon of Compassion’
    ………………………

    Right–what could possibly be more compassionate than raping a nine-year-old child, captives, and sex slaves–including a young woman whose father, husband, and entire family he just murdered? How about robbing caravans and enslaving kidnap victims? Mass slaughter? Having his critics assassinated? Genocide against an entire tribe, and enslavement of the women and children?

    I’m sure it isn’t that Haroon Moghul doesn’t know this–he is just hoping that the “filthy infidels” don’t know it, and he is certainly correct with the editors at the NYT.

    More:

    Moghul details how he rediscovered Muhammad during a time of doubt, marveling “that he buried the least loved of his fellow Arabs with his own hands.
    ………………………

    I have read the Qur’an several times, and much of the Hadiths and Sira, and I have never heard this story–nor could I find anything in a search..

    But if there *is* anything to this story, the “Prophet” was probably burying the man because he had just had him killed…

  14. Kadok says

    Dec 2, 2018 at 4:21 am

    the NYT celebrates the birthday of a person who initiated the deaths of millions of people, Some scholars place estimates of over 400 million dead and enslaved. this would be more deaths than the crusades, the Spanish inquisitions and WW II combined. In 2008, Islamic terrorists killed 10,779 & hurt 18,213… more people than the Spanish Inquisition did in its entire 350-year run. Since 9/11, there have been over 28,000 terror attacks committed by Islamic terrorists. Specifically, it actually gets worse:• 5000: Approximate dead in November 2014 due to Islamic terror. The Religion Of Peace reports 28,724 as July 1st 2016. On average, 29 people die every day due to Islamic terror attacks. A rough estimate, 270 million killed by jihad. Islam ran the wholesale slave trade in Africa. 11 million slaves were shipped across the Atlantic and 14 million were sent to the Islamic nations of North Africa and the Middle East. 120 million Africans DIED,60 million Christians DIED, 80 million Hindus DIED,10 million Buddhists DIED, ALL at the hands of the religion of peace ISLAM, and the same people call Americans racist, and the uniformed are writing stories and teaching our youth…

  15. islamic text says

    Dec 2, 2018 at 6:36 am

    Anyone in Indian Subcontinent whether muslim or Hindu , who knows the real history and about all those barbaric Invasions on India to Islamize it, Truth is truth you can’t ignore what happen in history all violence to invade India
    Everybody knows 1000 years Muslims kings invaded India
    Mohammad bin Qsim
    Tumour Babar Mehmood Ghznavi were Muslims
    , Mahmood ghaznavi, aurangzeb , Tumour were madarchods
    Mo and allah gave a dream to Tumour to kill the kafirs in India and China. He choose India
    In name of islam Muhammad bin Qasim and Alauddin khilji fought in Hindustan and shed blood
    In fact all the muslims in Indian subcontinents and Asia are converted because of fear of Mughals and Janghez khan who invaded Asia. That’s the reason they still are not given much value by the arabs.
    More than 90% muslims in India were Hindu’s before arab invasion. So there is no question on hindu v muslims . Islam is not an Indian religion. Hinduism Sikhism Buddhism and jainism are the religions started in India. islam does not belong to India.
    Muslims have no option but to negate because If they accept the truth it will only prove the Indian Muslims are born by Arab rape of Hindu women and thus proven bastards so they pretend to be of Arab blood
    Mugal’s Empire tried to change all Hindus to Muslims but they failed because Hindu ruler Shivaji damaged mugal empire severely and brought end of Mugal Rule in India.
    Mughal king Aurangzeb – the evil in one of the most monstrous ruler in world history
    • “Aurangzeb was a bigot not just by our standards but also by those of his predecessors and peers”
    • Aurungzeb killed 31st leader of dawoodi bohra and his army was beating his head with legs. And also he killed leader of sikh people too.
    https://scroll.in/article/856178/aurangzeb-was-a-bigot-not-just-by-our-standards-but-by-those-of-his-predecessors-and-peers
    • Many a hill in India, built by Muslims from the skulls of Hindus bears testimony to that narrative of benevolence and harmony.
    • Aurangzeb got the 9th Guru of Sikhs executed. He is the biggest villain for Sikhs
    • Ram’s city Lahore at time of partition 300,000 hindus now merely 1500 in
    • The fact is Mughals were illiterate and opium addicts right from babur down to Shah Jehan and incapable of any creative work. They got power only through typical al-taqiya and some luck. They forcibly took control of Rajput buildings like taj mahal, red fort, buland darwaza etc. and gave their own name.
    • Aurangzeb killed Shivaji’s son Sambhaji in most brutal way. Mughal rule was unmitigated disaster
    All Islam is radical. No version dishonors the beheading, torturing, stoning, caravan-raiding, child-dallying, daughter-in-law-stealing, and lying post-Hegira decade of Muhammad’s life or the bitterly vindictive post-Hegira Qur’ān. If Muslims really disapproved of their morals exemplar and the supposed word of their deity, they’d be in the streets of Jakarta, Kuala Lumpur, Cairo, Istanbul, Riyadh, Khartoum, Casablanca, Tunis, Tripoli, Karachi, Algiers, and Dhaka in the hundreds of thousands monthly to demonstrate against ISIS, Al-Qaeda, Boko Haram, Al-Shabaab, etc. They aren’t because they don’t.

  16. Jean (old) says

    Dec 2, 2018 at 2:41 pm

    It’s a typo.
    Should have said “A Power-Goon of Combustion”.
    At least that would have made better sense than what they did print.

    But, seriously, Mr. Moghul is honest enough: Muhammad did put quite a lot of his fellow Arabs into the grave, and some of them with his very own hands. And no doubt he got up close and personal with some of the orphans these deaths generated.

    From another point of view, it is significant that of the two examples of “compassion” Mr. Moghul finds himself capable of digging out of the voluminous writings about Muhammad’s life, one concerns dead bodies, and the other is purely speculative and concerns the afterlife.
    Literally speaking, it is of course impossible to be ‘com-passionate’ to a dead body (= caring about how it feels and trying to make it better), since it feels precisely nothing.

    When it comes to showing compassion with actual living, feeling beings, the horrific truth is that you cannot find any examples of that in the canonical texts about Muhammad.

    The only example I can recall at all concerns not humans, but cats, and is in the form of a threat. Muhammad is reported to have commented upon a woman who neglected to give her cat access to water that she would go to hell for it. He did like cats. But apparently in a way akin to the craziest militant vegans, who would literally behead someone for eating a hamburger.

    “There is no greater distance to compassion than that of islam.”

  17. LR says

    Dec 4, 2018 at 2:26 am

    I am so glad to know Mr. Moghul knows how compassionate Mohammed was.

    That sure clears things up.

    Now, we in the west can once again print out Mohammed cartoons, criticize Islam to our hearts content without fear of being called ‘Islamophobic’, getting death threats, or getting slaughtered.

    Right, Mr. Moghul

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • janicevanguilder on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Boycott Turkey on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Yogi on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Hoi Polloi on Why so many Muslims can’t wait for Biden to get inaugurated
  • Hoi Polloi on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.