That this would be a controversial proposal at all is a sign of how much Britain has lost its way.
“Sajid Javid defends deportation of grooming gang members,” by Matthew Weaver, Guardian, December 26, 2018:
The home secretary, Sajid Javid, has defended the potential deportation of convicted grooming gang members to Pakistan even if it risks them reoffending.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Javid said stripping offenders of British citizenship would happen only in extreme cases involving individuals with dual nationality.
He was pressed on the issue by the programme’s guest editor, the Pakistani-British writer Kamila Shamsie, who pointed out that the lack of sex offender registers in Pakistan would make it easier for offenders deported from the UK to repeat their crimes.
Javid responded: “I’m the British home secretary. My job is to protect the British public.”
Seeking to clarify, Shamsie asked: “If you are sending members of grooming gangs to Pakistan, knowing that there is not a sex offenders registry, what they do there is not anything to do with you?”
Javid said: “My job is to protect the British public.”…
He faced criticism over a Twitter message he posted in October about “sick Asian paedophiles” in a Huddersfield gang. Javid told Today: “I’m very much aware of the need for politicians to be careful with language as well as what they do. When it comes to gang-based child exploitation it is self-evident to anyone who cares to look that if you look at all the recent high-profile cases there is a high proportion of men that are of Pakistani heritage.”…
Halal Bacon says
What they did in the UK was likely a repeat of what they did in Pakistan before they found their way to the UK FFS
Save Europe says
I doubt it seriously. Pakistan is a Koranderthal nation. They only choose to rape non Muslim girls – both Christian and Sikh, in the UK.
R Russell says
Well time will tell if dhimmi UK will allow this to happen
Terry Gain says
Javid is campaigning to be the next Prime Minister. I have no idea what’s in his heart but since he’s a Muslim, I assume this is Taqiyya. It is likely to be very effective in this godforsaken country.
Bruce Crichton says
He isn’t a Muslim in the same way that Bosch Fawstin isn’t a Muslim.
Terry Gain says
Has he gone public with his apostasy?
lebel says
It’s taqqiya but jihadwatch can see right through it!
He also married a Christian woman to blend and claims to be pro-Israeli. But that’s not enough for jihadwatch because the only thing acceptable is to become an apostate, spit on the quran and call for the deportation of Muslims (including your own family and eventually yourself since you could be using taqqiya).
Muslims are ordered to lie and there is no limit to Taqqiya so nice try Javid!
Kepha says
He would not be the first to keep a Muslim name following apostasy. In a stretch of Africa with a partly Muslim population, a former pastor of mine dealt with formerly Muslim church elders.
FYI says
…And not a word of sympathy,not even ONE word, from the appaling ,two-faced,muslim troll lebel,no compassion for the victims of the Rotherham rapists,some of whom allegedly quoted the koran{talk about spitting on the koran!!how about that lebel, eh?muslims desecrating and dishonoring their ‘holy’ book of sin}…whilst they raped those poor women.
No moral compass.No compassion.Nothing but lying and taqqiya.
You islamic apologists are revolting creatures!
You are incessant defenders of that which cannot be defended:islam’s evil and wicked muslim perverts.
JW can see right through you lebel…
lebel says
“And not a word of sympathy,not even ONE word, from the appaling ,two-faced,muslim troll lebel,no compassion for the victims of the Rotherham rapists”
Wait a minute, you say that you’re on to my taqqiya yet you ask me to condemn something. Would that not be taqqiya too?
This is typical jihadwatch idiocy
FYI: “Hey Muslim, condemn this!”
Random Muslim: “OK I condemn it”
FYI: “Yeah right, Taqqiya!”
Random Muslim: “OK I don’t condemn it”
FYI: “Gotcha Muslim! you support these crimes”
Random Muslim says nothing
FYI: “Your silence is proof that you support these crimes!”
Here’s the reality, it does not matter what I say or don’t say. Your mind is made up and you are simply looking for whatever strengthens your pre-established conclusion about me (and ALL muslims). It’s fairly simple.
lebel says
Btw FYI I was addressing Terry Gain’s point that Mr. Sajid is using Taqqiya. Am I allowed to do that or should I condemn something so you can call taqqiya and feel intelligent?
gravenimage says
Note that even when called on it, lebel *still* fails to condemn Muslim rape of children. No surprise there. *Ugh*.
Jayell says
‘Javid is campaigning to be the next Prime Minister.’……aided and abetted by a certain Mrs. T. May, no doubt. And how else is he going to sell himself to the British public with his background now that the official rape gang cover-up has been well and truly blown? And, of course, everyone will fall for it, especially with the ‘Free Press’ (sic) being instructed to engineer the publicity and the only alternative being a certain Mr J. Corbyn and his gang of dimwits and lunatics, who will be made to look even worse than they are already. The term ‘stitch-up’ seems to come to mind.
Henry Mansfield says
Noticed the Rotherham hearings broken down into short Youtube segments this month, it’s a good thing because only a few minutes at a time was as much as I could take.
Seeing official after official take a seat and admit they knew exactly what was happening for decades showed just how far the Brits will go to shirk their duty if it involves angering Muslims.
Here in the USA we need to vigilant, Muslims will do the exact same thing here at the first opportunity. Let them know that news from the UK has made it here.
Mo says
Henry,
Please post links to the Rotherham hearings clips. I would like to watch these. I guess others on here might also be interested to see them.
Henry Mansfield says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ertguQNvsb8
The vids are old, I have a set-up where videos are ‘recommended’ according to what I’ve watched previously.
Watch a few and the next time you refresh Youtube more should pop up.
I’m looking at a good dozen on the list right now.
Michael Copeland says
“Muslims will do the exact same thing here at the first opportunity.”
They already have.
See some of their faces, from Colorado, Nashville, and Minnesota, at “Child Sex Gangs” on Liberty GB site. The article dates from 2013.
https://libertygb.org.uk/news/child-sex-gangs
A_M_Swallow says
> He was pressed on the issue by the programme’s guest editor, the Pakistani-British writer Kamila Shamsie, who pointed out that the lack of sex offender registers in Pakistan would make it easier for offenders deported from the UK to repeat their crimes.
This sounds like an organised attempt by Muslims to stop the deportation. Since he allowed the deportations to continue either Home Secretary Sajid Javid does not have the power to stop the deportations or thinks Parliament will fire him if he tried.
Anjuli Pandavar says
“Javid said stripping offenders of British citizenship would happen only in extreme cases involving individuals with dual nationality.”
—
1. In a case of gang-raping children, what constitutes ‘not extreme’?
2. They are *Muslims*. Nationality and citizenship mean nothing to them. What’s this “dual nationality” prissiness? They raped not because they are British and Pakistani, while their victims were only British. They raped because they are Muslims and their victims are not. The first things new recruits did when they arrived in ISIS-land was to burn their passports. Do we imagine that these Muslim rape gangs are any more closely bound to their British nationality than their ISIS brethren? Their umma, we are endlessly told, consists of 1.7 billion people. They are spread over at least 54 countries. Even if they don’t have dual nationality, they feel closer to that umma than they do to Britain. What is the problem? Put them on a Royal Navy vessel and dump them on a deserted Indonesian island. Ta-daaa! Everyone’s happy.
3. Stop calling them “grooming gangs”, FFS. They are *rape gangs*. They groomed in order to *rape*. That was the point of the grooming. They did not groom them for audition at a musical!
BBC Radio 4’s Today programme’s guest editor, Pakistani-British writer Kamila Shamsie, “pointed out that the lack of sex offender registers in Pakistan would make it easier for offenders deported from the UK to repeat their crimes.”
—
Is this woman a complete idiot? Pakistan is an *Islamic Republic*. Does Shamsie not know this? Raping captive infidel girls and women *is not a crime in Islam.*
John says
What a Laugh, in Pakistan, they would not care if they raped again. Sharia Law, it would therefore be 80% the Woman’s or Girl,s fault if she was raped, that is islam.
gravenimage says
True–and all the more so if the victims are Infidels.
A_M_Swallow says
If they are really bothered about these perverts raping girls in Pakistan we can castrate them before deporting them.
Peter says
Castration and life imprisonment, followed by cremation and the spreading of ashes in pigsties, would be better policy responses.
Mary says
Never mind cremation just bury them in pig stys.
Jay says
Imagine such a thing — deporting invaders who simply raped young women and girls!! What next, will beheaders be deported as well?
Vivarto says
Deportation?
Makes sure to castrate them first!