The hope of globalists was that the UN Migration Pact would be accepted by every Western nation virtually unnoticed. It is not quite working as intended. Astute Western citizens and “populist” leaders who guard the gates of democracy are opposing the Pact, which would undermine the sovereignty and freedoms of every Western country. The Pact would hand over sovereignty to the corrupt United Nations. It would lead to the final step in the Islamization of the West, via jihad by immigration (hijrah). The UN has been in close cooperation with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation.
“UK Lawmakers to Respond After 100,000 Sign Against UN Migration Pact,” by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, December 6, 2018:
British Members of Parliament must consider an official petition against the United Nations Global Compact for Migration after it smashed 100,000 signatures.
The British government is committed to issuing an official response to any petition which reaches 10,000 signatures — although it has left the UN compact petition unanswered for 12 days now — while petitions which break the 100,000 signature mark must be considered by Parliament’s Backbench Business Committee for a full debate.
Hugely controversial for provisions which allegedly make migration a universal human right and expand the definition of hate speech to include criticism of mass migration, a large number of countries have already pulled out of the compact.
The Global Compact is also increasingly embattled in the European Union, despite being championed by the bloc’s High Representative and largely devised by the government of Angela Merkel in Germany, its dominant state — with most of the anti-mass migration, pro-sovereignty governments of Central and South-Eastern Europe having pulled out, and Italy’s populist coalition referring the matter to parliament due to opposition from Matteo Salvini’s nationalist League party.
Even in Belgium, the base of the EU’s main capital of Brussels, the government was on the brink of collapse over the compact, with the Flemish N-VA bitterly opposed to left-liberal prime minister Charles Michel’s desire to sign it….
Terry Gain says
If the UK signs The Compact To Make Invasion Safe Orderly And Regular it will nullify Brexit, which is of course what the May government wants.
No Fear says
Yes indeed. Australia is not signing the UN Migrant compact at this point but that may change later. I hope it does not change.
dan christensen says
The UN migration pact is effectively “stealth jihad”.
Michael Copeland says
The “compact” bulldozes laws and constitutions away.
Peter Buckley says
Updates from Europe, for those who still think Islam “might win”:
Italy:
“Italy will not sign the United Nations Global Compact for Migration, nor will Italian officials attend a conference in Marrakech, Morocco, on December 10 and 11 to adopt the agreement.”
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13392/italy-immigration-law
Denmark to send foreign criminals to exile on desert island:
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/denmark-uses-least-pc-ad-ever-tell-foreign-criminals-deported-deserted-island/
Spain:
Far-right party wins seats in Andalusia (former muslim dominion) for first time in eighty years:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/03/spain-far-right-vox-party-wins-seats-in-andalucia-for-first-time-since-franco
Just saying………..
Aliza Circle says
I just hope that they will take all the immigration and leave the other countries live in peace. I would like for the UK to feel the pain that other countries feel.
underfoot says
why would you want that, the UK is already flooded with imigrants so much so that our roads are overloaded our hospitals and schools are at breaking point and we have a severe housing shortage, the UK over the years has taken more than it’s fair share of imigrants many of who get rewarded with hansom social benefit payments and free housing health care etc all paid for by the taxes of working Brits
gravenimage says
I don’t want to see *any* more Infidels suffer at the hands of violent Muslims.
eduardo odraude says
The EU’s “High Representative” — what a pretentious title. Not suggestive of democracy. How clueless can these promoters of the death of Europe be?
eduardo odraude says
When are the Germans going to vote out that dingleberry Merkel, that massively idiotic destroyer?
Andra says
In Germany we also have a petiton to the Parliament not to sign the Pact. Just within days there were over 100.000 signatures although many people who tried to sign were simply ignored by the system and the online voting pretended to be broken for several days.
Originally there have been 19 petitions to the Parliament in October but the Petition commitee dismissed all of them in the beginning because they could cause social troubles. As there has been quite negative press they finally opened one of the petitions on November 20th for signing. Within days there were the 100.000 signatures but the Parliament denies any discussion. Their argument is that they do not discuss petitions which are still open for signing. And by delaying the publication of the petition it can be signed until Dec 19th.
This is how Democracy works in modern Germany.
gravenimage says
So sorry to hear this, Andra.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
[1] Prepositional propaganda: The title of the treaty is not “the United Nations Global Compact on [= concerning] Migration” but ‘the United Nations Global Compact for[= in favor of] Migration”.
[2] ” a large number of countries have already pulled out of the compact”, “most of the anti-mass migration, pro-sovereignty governments of Central and South-Eastern Europe having pulled out”:
Name any of these countries that became part of this compact, and give the date when they joined it. I thought this compact was supposed to be signed in Marrakesh, Morocco, this coming Sunday. So how could any country have already joined it and subsequently pulled out of it?
Ragdoll says
I signed the petition, for all the good it will do.
DHazard says
Do these guys already have their tombstones carved and ready to ship?:
Peabody North White
“Lefty”
1980-2018
“He was NEVER called a racist or Islamophobe”
brane pilot says
It’s official.
Those who breed like rabbits and destroy their societies have a basic human right to invade the societies of those who don’t, and be supported by their welfare systems for life.
Also, host societies must defer to the cultural sensitivities of migrants from these alien cultures in all matters including whether to obey the laws or cultural norms of the host society.
The host societies gain the reward of higher retirement age, reduced pensions, higher taxes, and higher crime to support the migrants as a leisure class who cannot be forced to labor against their will due to their cultural sensitivities. They also gain the blessings of ‘Diversity’. It is a win-win for everyone.
This stuff would have been unbelievably dystopian science fiction only two decades ago. The people standing in front of the microphones are dead serious.
loki says
Parliament will accord the same amount of serious consideration to this petition as it did to the voter mandate expressed in the BREXIT vote.
gravenimage says
UK: Petition against UN Migration Pact passes 100,000 signatures, requiring Parliament to respond
………………………
Good news so far–glad so many patriotic Britons signed.
Leon Degney says
My guess is that the 100,000 signature petition will be treated the same as the Brexit vote was, that it will be almost totally disregarded by the establishment.
Harold Armitage says
UK government response. Arrived almost instantly so no discussion took place.
The Government has responded to the petition you signed – “The UK should not agree the UN’s Global Compact for Migration”.
Government responded:
The Global Compact for Migration will support global co-operation on migration without affecting the sovereignty of all countries to control their own borders.
Uncontrolled migration erodes public confidence, damages economies, and places those on the move in situations of intense vulnerability. The UK is taking significant steps to tackle uncontrolled migration by:
– Addressing the root causes of migration, through our targeted assistance for livelihoods, healthcare, education and economic development
– Tackling modern slavery and organised immigration crime
– Supporting enhanced border management
– Providing critical humanitarian support and protection for vulnerable migrants, as well as offering voluntary return and vital reintegration support to those wishing to return home
– Supporting refugees to stay in a first safe country through our humanitarian and development work in Africa, the Middle East and Asia
The Global Compact for Migration embeds these efforts within the global system, enhances cooperation between states, and sets out ways that countries may choose to deliver these objectives.
The Compact is not legally binding. It creates a framework to allow countries to work together to make global migration more beneficial for everyone.
It respects the sovereignty of all states to decide who enters their territory. It will not affect our ability to determine and implement our own migration policies, including in areas such as asylum, border controls and returns of illegal migrants.
It does not establish a ‘human right to migrate’ or create any new legal categories of migrant. It explicitly stresses that migrants are entitled to the same universal human rights as any human being, and that these are different to the legal protections available to refugees.
Too many people, including vulnerable women and girls, are taking risky journeys to migrate through dangerous channels. The Compact will help us take important steps to keep migrants around the world safer and to protect the most vulnerable, by supporting international cooperation on the protection of migrants, in line with our obligations under international law. It outlines ways of preventing exploitation, and of combating the heinous crime of modern slavery.
A key objective of the document is to support cooperation on reducing uncontrolled migration. It sets out the responsibility of countries of origin to ensure effective control of their borders, and to cooperate in accepting the return of their nationals when they no longer have the right to remain in another country. Furthermore, the text also calls on countries of origin to work with the international community to address the drivers of irregular migration, by creating economic opportunities for populations in source countries, and improving governance and respect for the rule of law.
When migration is safe and regular, it can bring great prosperity. The Compact also sets out possible actions to harness the economic benefits of safer, regular migration, for example by reducing the costs of remittances that migrants send home. These can foster economic development in source countries, helping to address some of the causes of migration.
The Compact is the result of months of intergovernmental negotiations. Though it is legally non-binding and no country can be compelled to conform with its provisions, we are aware that a small number of countries have chosen not to endorse it. We respect this choice and note that countries will be able to endorse the Compact, or cooperate with other states on delivering its objectives, at any point in the future.
Department for International Development
Click this link to view the response online:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/232698?reveal_response=yes
This petition has over 100,000 signatures. The Petitions Committee will consider it for a debate. They can also gather further evidence and press the government for action.
The Committee is made up of 11 MPs, from political parties in government and in opposition. It is entirely independent of the Government. Find out more about the Committee: https://petition.parliament.uk/help#petitions-committee
Thanks,
The Petitions team
UK Government and Parliament
gravenimage says
Thanks for the link. This is disgustingly dismissive of Britons’ concerns, but not surprising.
Alain Lenferna de la Motte says
“100 000 signatures that requires Parliament to respond…” These signatures will probably amount to nothing, just like the majority British vote on Britex from the people is being brushed aside by its government. The ‘people’s’ truly democratic voice is no longer taken into account today. In many Western countries, the freedom to chose has become a sham. Reality is that autocracy rules, in the manner of socialism, communism and Islamism.
dan christensen says
The meeting in Marrakech is a golden opportunity for all participating European politicians. As soon the have signed th pact, they can present a demand immediately to all the migrantemitting countries. In particular the islamic countries.
Many European jails are filled with muslim jihadists and other criminal muslims. In some countries the prison population is compelety dominated by muslim inmates. Many of those dangerously criminal muslims have convictions followed by deportation orders. Up to now most islamic countries refuse to receive their own deported citizens. After the Marrakech meeting, these islamic countries are now obliged to take back their own criminal migrants – Hurrah!
simpleton1 says
The 20 countries that will not sign
USA, Hungary, Austria, Bulgaria, Poland, Israel, Estonia, Czech Republic, Croatia, Slovenia, Slovakia, Switzerland, Denmark, Italy, Russia, China, South Korea, Japan, Australia, Lithuania.
Belgium is now having heated parliamentary debate.
Does one think that refugees would be made welcome in Saudi Arabia?
Petition in UK has reached 100,000 in quick time, that means debate should occur in UK parliament.
gravenimage says
Bravo to these twenty countries–I am proud that my nation is among them!
simpleton1 says
gravenimage 🙂
Plus 2 more
Latvia and Dominican Republic.
Media in my country is not publishing anything about protests, information, and downplaying any opposition’s political noise, as the current socialist government is keeping its cards close to its chest.