Get The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS here. What better gift can you give than the truth that the political and media elites are working indefatigably to obscure?
“What we must know about 1400 years of the religion of peace,” by Bill Muehlenberg, Spectator Australia, December 16, 2018:
The Communists relished having hordes of “useful idiots” in the West to readily carry out their agenda and became their avid apologists. Today we have a similar situation when it comes to the political ideology known as Islam. Both have resulted in millions of murdered and terrorised victims, yet both have their plenteous supporters and ideological foot-soldiers.
Thankfully many have been awake to the reality of these killing machines. There were always some courageous souls who were willing to document and denounce the evils of totalitarian communism. Obviously, Alexander Solzhenitsyn and his three-volume, The Gulag Archipelago (1973-1978) come to mind. So too the after-the-fact expose, The Black Book of Communism by Stéphane Courtois, Nicolas Werth, Andrzej Paczkowski and others, (first published in French in 1997).
It is the same when it comes to Islam. Its 1400-year history speaks for itself, but many have sought to chronicle its bloodletting and terror. One thinks of contemporary voices such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Ibn Warraq, Oriana Fallaci, Walid Phares, Geert Wilders, Bat Ye’or, Brigitte Gabriel, Nonie Darwish and Pam Gellar – champions all.
But credit must also go to one American authority on Islam, creeping sharia, and the threat the West is under. I refer to Robert Spencer. I have most of his eighteen books, and can attest to his massive storehouse of knowledge, insight and concern he offers in his trenchant and illuminating works. And his latest volume is no exception.
In The History of Jihad, he offers us a panoramic view of 14 centuries of Islamic bloodshed and killing. And he wastes no time in going for the jugular. As he says in the introduction:
There is no period since the beginning of Islam that was characterized by large-scale peaceful coexistence between Muslims and non-Muslims. There was no time when mainstream and dominant Islamic authorities taught the equality of non-Muslims with Muslims, or the obsolescence of jihad warfare. There was no Era of Good Feeling, no Golden Age of Tolerance, no Paradise of Proto-Multiculturalism. There has always been, with virtually no interruption, jihad.
Strong claims. But Spencer spends 400 pages documenting this in great detail. And all this is due to the life and teachings of Muhammad as recorded in the Qur’an, the hadiths, and the Sira. Indeed, both of the major schools of Islam, Sunni and Shi’ite, fully affirm the need to kill the infidel if they refuse to convert or be subjugated.
Islamic terror goes back to day one of Islam. As Muhammad said on his deathbed: “I have been made victorious with terror.” Spencer remarks, “It was a fitting summation of his entire public career.” Thus the first chapter of this vital book looks carefully at the role jihad played in the life of Islam’s founder. It is not a pretty read.
And since Muhammad is regarded as the perfect example for all Muslims to follow, his bloodthirsty ways were carefully emulated by his devout adherents ever since. Spreading the faith by the edge of the sword was forever to be standard Muslim practice.
Thus by the end of the seventh century, just decades after Muhammad’s death, authoritarian Muslim control extended from North Africa to Central Asia. And the spread of Islam continued apace over the next few centuries. The conquest of Spain and India followed, and the body count continued to mount up.
So too did slavery, destruction, bloodshed and dhimmitude. The gory details of ruthless Islamic oppression in these and other regions are carefully related by Spencer, usually relying on accounts written during the time. And the many stories of the enslavement and persecution and pogroms against Christians and Jews makes up a big part of all this.
While the phrase ‘streets running with rivers of blood’ may involve some poetic license, more than once we read of this being the outcome of Islamic slaughter and carnage. For example, Spencer cites historian Steven Runciman regarding the fall of Constantinople in May of 1453:
The Muslims “slew everyone that they met in the streets, men, women, and children without discrimination. The blood ran in rivers down the steep streets from the heights of Petra toward the Golden Horn. But soon the lust for slaughter was assuaged. The soldiers realized that captives and precious objects would bring them greater profit.”
Or consider one contemporary Muslim account of the jihad against Hindus in India in the fourteenth century. Some 100,000 men had taken refuge on an island along with their families. The Muslims transformed “the island into a basin of blood by the massacre of the unbelievers…. Women with babies and pregnant ladies were haltered, manacled, fettered and enchained, and pressed as slaves into service at the house of every soldier.”
The Islamic warlord Tamerlane, who actually penned an autobiography, spoke of his dilemma as to what to do with a large horde of Hindu prisoners. He went with an easy option, saying this: “One hundred thousand infidels, impious idolaters, were on that day slain.”
Moving to more recent times, consider the treatment of the Christian Armenians. Late in 1894 a massacre lasting 24 days wiped out 25 villages. People were burned alive, and pregnant women were ripped open and their babies torn to pieces.
But much worse was to come. The Armenian genocide, beginning in 1915, resulted in the death of around one and a half million Armenians, 700,000 Greeks, and 275,000 Assyrians. Says Spencer: “Christian communities that had existed since the beginning of Christianity were wiped out. Constantinople, fifty per cent Christian even in 1914, is today 99.99 per cent Muslim… Adolf Hitler was impressed with the brutal efficiency of how the Turks answered their ‘Armenian question’.”
He also looks at the Islamic war against Israel. He recounts how the Soviet KGB invented the fiction of the Palestinian people (there long had been a region known by the name of Palestine, but never a people or an ethnicity). The Soviets also helped to form the PLO and carefully mentored Arafat to do their bidding.
Spencer quotes a PLO leader who said in 1977, “The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state was only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity.” He also discusses the formation of Hamas in 1988 and its determination to wipe Israel off the map.
He brings things right up to date, looking at Al-Qaeda, the Islamic State, and September 11. And he reminds us how harmful policies of appeasement and Islamophilia have been in the West. For example, the Catholic church which was once on “the forefront of resistance to the jihad for centuries” has begun to cave, especially under the current Pope, who has become an avid defender of Islam and the Qur’an….
We all owe Robert Spencer a debt of gratitude for bringing together in one volume this stomach-turning but necessary story of what Islam is really all about. Hopefully, this book will do for the threat of Islam what The Gulag Archipelago did for communism.
Bill Muehlenberg is a Melbourne cultural commentator
Read the rest here.
DHazard says
It’s unsettling to think of how one man’s issues can grow into such a huge, deadly, irredeemable mess as Islam. It all could have stopped before it started if Muhammad’s sugar mama and Christian wife had cut him off financially until he “stabilized”.
mortimer says
Mohammed was lucky to appear at the time when both Roman and Persian empires were weak and decimated by plagues. Some 30% of their populations died in days, leaving their empires relatively undefended. The Arab raiders moved in, not by skill, but by courage and a belief in their destiny.
If Rome and Persia had not be weak at the same moment, we would never have heard of Mohammed generally. He would have been another Robin Hood figure.
gravenimage says
Likely true, Mortimer–except that the vicious “Prophet” Muhammed had little in common with Robin Hood morally.
mortimer says
Mohammed shares Robin Hood’s lack of historicity. They are both the products of vivid imaginations and political needs.
jihad3tracker says
And even females — in our United States — who worship bloodthirsty Allah are busy with stealth jihad. If you have not been following developments regarding prayer-break demands from Muslims who “work” at Amazon in Minnesota, go to this hotlink:
https://gellerreport.com/2018/12/ilhan-omar-amazon-jihad.html/
It is at the blog of Robert Spencer’s colleague, Pamela Geller. The behavior those Muzzies exhibit is explained by Pam, and Robert has written about that many times here on JW.
And disgusting mutt ILHAN OMAR is, of course, joining in the “protest” to add her own headaches into the lap of Amazon,
PLEASE, EVERYONE — Email the hotlink above to your conservative federal and state elected officials. Make clear to them that such supremacist attitudes ARE ESSENTIAL TO ISLAM, GOING ALL THE WAY BACK TO MUHAMMAD’S LIFE WHEN HE ASSEMBLED SUPPORTERS.
And warn those representatives & senators what the future holds, unless they steadfastly resist ideological extortion —- MORE OF THE SAME, EVERY MONTH & YEAR until our country is Sharia compliant, like the U.K. and Germany already are.
SEND YOUR EMAIL TO A REGIONAL DISTIRCT OFFICE — NOT THE HYPER-BUSY ONE IN WASHINGTON DC. And I emphatically recommend finishing the remarks by writing “I hope for the courtesy of a reply to this correspondence.
revereridesagain says
I’ve read a great deal about disasters, both natural and man-made, and a common thread is that most people do not act to save themselves and others until the threat becomes immediate and escape or reversal much more difficult. The exceptions are usually people who know more about the nature of the threat, whether it be volcanoes, disease, icebergs, wildfires or just wanton neglect of safety equipment. Anyone with a respect for facts and reality who reads “The History of Jihad’ is going to become one of those people with regard to the threat to us from Islam.
Chuck Henderson says
In addition to Robert Spencer, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Ibn Warraq, Oriana Fallaci, Walid Phares, Geert Wilders, Bat Ye’or, Brigitte Gabriel, Nonie Darwish, Pam Gellar & other worthies mentioned above, may I highly recommend Raymond Ibrahim’s “Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War Between Islam and the West”, with a glowing foreword by Ibrahim’s mentor, no less a light than Victor Davis Hanson…
Absolutely terrific, and a page-turning read, to boot!!
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
“Christian Preacher Arrested For Violating Sharia Law In Minnesota”:
https://www.brighteon.com/5980626852001
full show: https://www.brighteon.com/5980677740001
Battle says
“Revereridesagain”
+1
gravenimage says
What we must know about 1400 years of the religion of peace
……………………..
What we must know, of course, is that it is anything but.
Kudos to Bill Muehlenberg.
Battle says
“Flavioius Claudius Iulianus”
+1
mortimer says
HISTORY OF JIHAD is the necessary emetic to counteract the POISONOUS LIES of the LEFTARDS which are causing the WEST to COMMIT SUICIDE.
william couch says
the only peace will be when “ALL” knees are bowed to alllla
brane pilot says
Dudes.
The problem is not Muslims. They have not changed in 1600 years and will remain savages for another 1600 years.
The USA squandered $3 Trillion over 17 years and counting trying to civilize Afghanistan. It failed.
The real problem confronting the West is suicidal progressive fools who are letting Muslim savages into our countries by the Millions.
THAT is the problem.
End Muslim immigration. Leave them in their own countries. They are happy there.
Jayell says
What do we in the West understand by a ‘religion’? A God-centred purely personal philosophy that prescribes a positive,
constructive and respectful towards everyone and everything. That discounts islam completely, which is an aggressive totalitarian political ideology masquerading as a ‘religion’ in order to validate a comprehensive level of control over its brainwashed followers in order to promote its destructive imperialistic agenda.