Note that they see the conflict they are being trained to fight exclusively in Islamic terms. Cue the establishment counterterror analysts to explain to us that they don’t really mean it.
Imagine the fun when these children meet the children who will go to, say, Stanford, or the University at Buffalo, or any other college or university in America today. Half of the American children will cower, run to safe spaces, and then get on their knees and submit. Half will join the attackers, cheering them for taking on racist, “Islamophobic” America.
“Houthi video shows children being trained to ‘fight America and Israel,’” Al Arabiya, November 30, 2018 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
A video purportedly showing schoolchildren being trained by Houthis to take up arms has gone viral, showcasing the mindset of the militias who can go to any extent in pursuit of their objectives.
“In the name of Allah, the Merciful, these are the students of Imam al-Nasser School. They went for training today and the exercises were very tough. God willing, these are the ones who will fight America and Israel,” says the man who is seen speaking in the video.
He further says that these children are the ones who will fight in the name of Allah “Because they are practicing now and they are still a young generation that is willing to fight the enemies of Allah”.
The video ends with the battle cries of “Allah the Greatest, Death to America, Death to Israel, curse on Jews, the triumph of Islam”….
Peter Buckley says
This is comical. Here we have a situation where the Houthis are engaged in a civil war against their “muslim brothers” , Saudi Arabia. And here we have a newspaper, controlled and run by the Saudis and their (Sunni) gulf partners:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Arabiya
telling us that the Houthis, currently being killed by Saudi-backed forces, are more concerned with Israel and the US. You couldn’t make this stuff up.
“On Thursday, Prince Khalid bin Salman, Saudi Arabia’s Ambassador to the United States, had said that Iran-backed Houthis “desecrate the sanctity of childhood by recruiting them to the battlefield and brainwashing them with the extremist ideology of the Iranian regime”.
https://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/gulf/2018/11/30/Houthi-video-shows-children-being-trained-to-fight-America-and-Israel-.html
Pot, kettle, black.
Still,keep it up, guys, you’re doing a great job……..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8TI1NYYzPo
One by one shall they fall………..
gravenimage says
Exactly, Peter–these children are being threatened *by other Muslims*–but they are being taught to hate Americans and Jews. *Ugh*.
J D S says
Nothing can change stupidity breeding stupidity in the Muslim world except total extinction…and st the rate they are going islam will implode in the future.
Frank Anderson says
This article suggests an interesting question. What do personal injury insurance policies exclude from coverage on the basis of war or terrorism. What if a person driving a car kills or injures another person in a terror attack? The car (or any motor vehicle) should have insurance; but does the policy exclude coverage for war or terrorism? Then the injured or killed person’s “uninsured coverage” may have its own exclusion. While the driver causing the attack is not insured to cover other parties claims, there was a recent article here about a state (MN?) requiring insurance companies to write life insurance policies for terrorists in case get killed in the process of committing the attack.
I understand that generally, because they pass “outside the probate estate”, proceeds of life insurance policies are exempt from creditors’ claims. So putting these rules and hypotheticals together, a terrorist can kill or injure a person, who then collects no payment from any insurance source, while the terrorist’s family gets rich tax-free from his criminal act. Only in America?
Please consult a currently licensed attorney practicing in your jurisdiction for any legal advice.
Bronxgirl says
Yes. I am Jewish and I teach a lot of Yemeni kids in NYC. I let them know that and also tell them I had many relatives killed in the Holocaust. This is a group of Muslims that do seem particularly backward with most of their mothers covering their faces. The boys are pretty wild, choosing to ingratiate with many of the Dominican girls, whose culture is much more open and demonstrative.
gravenimage says
Stay safe, Bronxgirl.
Ferd III says
Our Church holds weekly prayer requests for those ‘suffering victims in Yemen’. I refuse to say ‘God graciously answer our prayer’. Yemenis are Moslems and suffering or not, they would never help any non-Moslem in need, nor do they believe in the Kufar being equal or of similar importance. Islam is Jihad pure and simple. If we were weak and suffering they would gloat and conquer.
I have heard very few communal prayers asking for the Lord to help deliver Christians in Moslem countries, from slavery, sex trafficking, attacks and death. But that is the Catholic church firmly in the hands of Gays and Libtards. Not a surprise they have communal prayers for Moslems.
Frank Anderson says
FERD, with sincere respect, is it time for you to question your affiliation with that church?
I disconnected from mine for much the same reason because there was no reason to expect their changing and I refuse to change to their view of surrender. God Knows US, with or without a church. According the Rabbi Harold Kushner (Why Bad Things Happen to Good People), we go to congregational gatherings not to find God, but to share with each other our little piece of God for strength and insight. When that community becomes offensive and indifferent to your interests, I would Suggest you review your situation.
b.a. freeman says
good call, Frank. i’m a born-again christian, but my name isn’t on the rolls of any church; instead, it’s on the rolls of heaven, which is permanent and of the Father, while any church is just a human organization that is subject to the same failures as any other human organization. if the believers with whom i associate go off the deep end and won’t go by what the bible teaches, then i won’t associate with them in worship – although, since Jesus associated with prostitutes and tax collectors while He was with us, i must do the same and not cut them off completely.
furthermore, regardless of one’s religion, it is probably a good idea to dissociate oneself from groups of fellow believers who are enabling islam. why participate in the activities that one *knows* are destroying one’s society? thus, i, too, urge Ferd to seriously consider finding another group of believers with whom to worship.
Frank Anderson says
B.A.F., I take absolutely no pleasure in my decision or my suggestion. I came to the conclusion that I OWE a duty to protect myself from bad influences from any source. No association is worth my becoming a slave to another’s control. I would have a hard time fitting any religious label I know. But, I have a very strong reason to believe in the existence and presence of a God who cares about me. If He cares about me, as near nothing and unimportant as I am, He cares about all of us.
The Great Commandment is stated 2 ways in the New Testament. In one book it is stated as one, to love God and your neighbor AS yourself. In another it is broken into two parts with the same meaning. If you do not love yourself enough to perform your duty to protect yourself, how can you love your neighbor enough to be “your brother’s keeper”?
I do not write about the devastating personal lesson that taught me about my duty and others’ rights to decide who to spend time in conversation. But when a relationship becomes not just uncomfortable, but harmful, DUTY to protect self takes priority over all other interests. I challenge the whole concept of “cultural suicide” because I as a lawyer know the difference between suicide and murder: I cannot decide that you should commit suicide. There are narrow exceptions to that basic rule, particularly living wills and end-of-life orders that are handled by representatives (proxies). But electing some horrible fool to political office does not give that person authority to order my death by any means or omission. When a religious community ceases to be supportive of individual liberty and progress, it has lost its authority and any right it might have to claim to teach its community. It is time to leave, either to find another community or to be a community of one.
A_M_Swallow says
> Half of the American children will cower, run to safe spaces, and then get on their knees and submit.
This policy will backfire. Cornered animals fight to the death. The Western children have not been exposed to traditional morality, so when they fight there will be no limits. The lack of proportion is shown by the way they can not debate but call people who disagree with them names. This fight will get nasty.
b.a. freeman says
this *could* be a nasty fight, A_M, but i imagine that it will begin with sucker punches that will leave the western progeny reeling because they never saw it coming. the blows will come from those whom the westerners helped (in a bout of virtue-signaling, but a kindness nonetheless), and the westerners will neither expect the attacks nor even understand that they are under attack, until it is too late. when there are survivors of the attacks, *then* we will see people whose outlook has been radically changed, and i suspect that leftist survivors will suddenly see muslims as the problem, rather than islam; after all, the left does have serious issues with separating the ideology and the people in their thinking.
sadly, as U noted, A_M, the majority of american children have been raised to be “good,” as opposed to being virtuous, with virtue being an absolute defined by God, not man; of course, “good” means whatever the left says it means, including brownshirt activities like rioting to silence those whom they (the left) oppose. judeo-christian virtue would lead one to judge each individual by his actions, but leftist belief leads one to kill not only those who are attacking one, but also those who *might* be thinking the same way. nevertheless, once the gloves are off, the americans will want to live, while the muslims will want death while killing kuffar to ensure their entrance into jannah; furthermore, a pious muslim is far more familiar with the “necessity” of killing, having spent his entire life simmering in a stew of hatred, while leftists don’t learn to murder until much later, and will probably have a harder time personally accepting its “necessity.” the outcome of that civil war is difficult to predict, but i call it for the muslims on the grounds that they are probably better murderers, and that there will be a lot more of them than there will be leftists.
gravenimage says
A_M_Swallow, on what do you base your claim that Western children are brutal savages?
A_M_Swallow says
The snow lands of Europe and North America are very nasty environments, Over thousands of years we have had to both group together and fight outsides to survive. We are at war even as we speak.
Some of the things controlled the fighting and sport teach include how to win, how to lose and how to stick to the rules. For a few decades schools have been banning sport and fighting, so playing fair has not been taught. Calling the other person names may be fun but does not lead to victory in a fist fight. Not knowing where to hit, how to parry and where not to hit causes you to lose. Without skill people have to use savagery.
gravenimage says
A_M_Swallow wrote:
The snow lands of Europe and North America are very nasty environments, Over thousands of years we have had to both group together and fight outsides to survive. We are at war even as we speak.
Some of the things controlled the fighting and sport teach include how to win, how to lose and how to stick to the rules. For a few decades schools have been banning sport and fighting, so playing fair has not been taught. Calling the other person names may be fun but does not lead to victory in a fist fight. Not knowing where to hit, how to parry and where not to hit causes you to lose. Without skill people have to use savagery.
……………………..
The idea that that European and North American children are vicious beasts is simply not borne out.
Nor does the argument from weather make a great deal of sense–in that case, Islam, which developed in a warm environment, would be peaceful and compassionate, yet it is anything but.
It would also seem that Swedish children should be savages, and that children from somewhere like Australia, which is warm, would have nothing in common with them. But Western children, from Norway to Italy to Canada to Arizona to New Zealand, while not identical, have a great deal in common culturally.
It was, in fact, the supposedly brutal West that developed values of equality, fair play, and reason. This should not have been possible given the winters in Europe and North America.
If anything, children in the West have mostly been taught to be *too* passive, and are often easy prey for violent Muslim children.
A_M_Swallow says
The lack of water makes deserts a very nasty environment. Nomadic life styles still existed in many Muslim countries a century ago – as Arabs moved from one waterhole to the next.
“Over thousands of years we have had to both group together …” made the Swedes a cooperative nation since an entire village was needed to plant and harvest the crops.
Many American children are being prescribed tranquillizers like diazepam, which helps to keep the schools quiet. However when they grow up these people will be joining the battles against Muslims. That is when the savagery comes out.
gravenimage says
A_M_Swallow wrote:
The lack of water makes deserts a very nasty environment. Nomadic life styles still existed in many Muslim countries a century ago – as Arabs moved from one waterhole to the next.
………………………
Judaism and Christianity arose from an environment that was pretty harsh, as well–yet they are nothing like Islam. Moreover, many Muslims live in places that have mild environments–yet this has not mellowed Islam.
More:
“Over thousands of years we have had to both group together …” made the Swedes a cooperative nation since an entire village was needed to plant and harvest the crops.
………………………
The idea that any nation that is agricultural is hence peaceful does not follow. Moreover, all of the “snow lands” of Europe and North America are also agricultural, save for the very farthest north.
And the Swedes and other Scandinavians–in the form of the Vikings–really were a brutal lot a thousand years ago. National character can change, despite the environment not significantly changing.
More:
Many American children are being prescribed tranquillizers like diazepam, which helps to keep the schools quiet. However when they grow up these people will be joining the battles against Muslims. That is when the savagery comes out.
………………………
So–there is absolutely no indication that Europeans and North Americans are savages–but there will be once they are all off their meds and battling Muslims?
And these tranquilizers are a recent phenomenon. Where is there an indication that those from the snow lands were savages just a few decades ago? Denmark, Switzerland, and Canada are all well known for rough winters–yet, oddly, Danes, Swiss, and Canadians are not known for their savagery.
A_M_Swallow says
> Judaism and Christianity arose from an environment that was pretty harsh, as well–yet they are nothing like Islam.
St Paul moved Christianity from Israel to Rome. There is plenty of water in Rome. I suspect that you are also talking about European Judaism.
Scandinavia – I was careful to say village. Vikings treated people in the same village and the towns they raided very differently.
> So–there is absolutely no indication that Europeans and North Americans are savages–but there will be once they are all off their meds and battling Muslims?
Yes. Although the street gangs in the USA suggests something nasty is going on.
> Where is there an indication that those from the snow lands were savages just a few decades ago?
During World War 1 and 2 soldiers were not exactly nice to the enemy soldiers they were shooting at. European countries had big empires.
Walter Sieruk says
How totally despicable and cowardly of the adults jihadist /Muslims are to brainwash , manipulate , exploit and abuse impressionable youths as suicide/homicide bombers for their mad Islamic quest., Some good people of reason, might , stop and wonder and then ask “Just how can those jihad-minded adults be so completely cruel and unconscionable as to use, youth as stooges and tools for human bombs ?” The answer to the question is found in the Bible. For the Bible informs its reader that there are some people who are so extremely heartless, unfeeling, cold, callous and dangerous because they have had “their conscience seared with a hot iron.” First Timothy 4:2. [K.J.V.] The “hot iron” in this case is Islam.
b.a. freeman says
+1
DHazard says
Do Muslims even have a childhood? The bitterness that pervades Islamic culture must be absorbed by developing Muslim babies. And when I read about honor killings I start to wonder about the nature of the bond Muslim parents have with their female children. Do Muslims really love Muhammad more than every single one of their relatives? If they do, then that’s bad news for the kids. The seeds of misogyny, racism, dishonesty, intellectual laziness, and unearned self importance are being sown at every stage of their development.
Frank Anderson says
D.H. after reading all the books I have, now including several versions of the Koran, and especially Wafa Sultan’s A God Who Hates, I don’t see value being placed on childhood in islam. I remember the Fox News special Terror in Its Own Words, that included video recordings of muslim fathers dressing up their 3 year olds as suicide bombers. Please tell me, do you see any different indications?
gravenimage says
True, DHazard and Frank. There is little love of children in Islam; mostly abuse.