The first priority of government and law enforcement authorities all over the West seems to be to ensure that no one think ill of Islam or of that mass Muslim migration project. The protection of citizens? Pah! Low priority.
“Finland: Police banned from telling about crimes of asylum seekers…….,” Tundra Tabloids, January 24, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
Yet another example of why there should never be a nationalized police force…
The politicization of law enforcement is a dangerous thing, having one top-down command structure for all police demonstrates that for all to see.
The police banned from telling about crimes of asylum seekers
At the beginning of last week, Häme Police Department personnel received internal communications instructions on police information related to the current situation of asylum seekers. The six-page guidance signed by the Police Chief and the Communications Officer of the Department has raised a lively discussion among staff in the facility. Many experienced police consider it exceptional.
Discussion has been raised by a daily police newsletter that “not mention the status of the suspect as an asylum seeker when reporting offenses”. In the guidelines, this provision is justified by the fact that asylum matters are widely held in secret and that there is, as a rule, no legal justification for the expression of asylum seeker status.
The alignment is a surprise to the long-term police in the department. He doubts whether the interpretation of secrecy has been stretched unnecessarily.
– Nobody’s identity is revealed by the fact that he is said to be an asylum seeker.
New regulations are also justified in the Communication Guidelines. Communication aims to promote security and social peace. Communication also aims to strengthen trust in police activities and to prevent radicalization and racist phenomena.
The instruction reminds the police not to take the sides. Asylum seekers are treated neutrally, impartially and objectively. The guidelines have also been extended to private, free-time discussions: “Police officers must, in accordance with their role, duties and behavioral responsibilities, treat asylum seekers in a neutral manner also in their personal leisure activities.”
According to the information we have received, this point has aroused a lot of surprise among the department’s staff, some of the police have experienced the practice of restricting freedom of expression in practice….
Dawne says
Because the elite realise they have made a mistake in letting in murderers and rapists. They don’t want people to know about it so that they do not lose elections/power. Protecting their privilege. What do a few murdered/raped/assaulted peasants matter?
St Ferd III says
Newspeak. Speaking truth pace Orwell, is now becoming a revolutionary act. Finland is just another example of a failing state in denial about the whole purpose and objective of the Muhammadan moon cult and its associated criminality.
BC says
You are talking through the wrong orifice. I live in Finland and I would say that it is streets ahead of most EU countries in its dealing with migrants and definitely kilometers ahead of its neighbour Sweden! For one thing much stricter conditions are applied to ‘asylum’ applications
Giacomo Latta says
If it were Swedes that were doing the raping, would that item of information get mentioned, especially during hockey season?
gravenimage says
This may be the case, BC, but *surely* you don’t agree that police should not be able to report about the crimes of Muslim immigrants?
Anjuli Pandavar says
And the tens of thousands of victims of Muslim rape, paedophilia, assault, murder, kidnapping, theft, arson, etc., will never know that they’ve been victims at all, and we can all get on with building our happy harmonious multicultural paradise. It is, after all, the duty of the police to ensure social harmony. Who’s to say there’s only one way of achieving that? They’ll just need to plug the holes still in the system, though. If hospitals, doctors, nurses and paramedics refuse to treat such phantom injury patients, then the crimes will never have been committed at all. Anyone who says otherwise will obviously be mentally ill.
somehistory says
“Dead men tell no tales.” And neither do those who wish to conceal the fact that moslims…a.k.a. “asylum seekers”…are committing a large number of crimes If word gets out that moslims cannot be trusted to obey the laws, and that the “asylum seekers” are not in need of asylum, but instead are the ones creating that need for others, the public will know they are not secure. If the public realizes the risks they now face, there is the threat of not being able to “prevent radicalization and racist phenomena” for everyone knows that if the violence and lawbreaking activities of moslims are made public, that will cause more “radicalizing of moslims and the public will all be racists against islam.’
What is to be the penalty if an officer talks in his “leisure” time about moslims committing crimes? Will he be fired, turned over to a barracks for punishment, or something else?
If a person has severe bad breath, but everyone is afraid to say so, does it make the severe bad breath go away if the people all keep quiet about it? Or will the person keep on stinking up the air for others? The cops may not be allowed to say moslims are committing crimes, but not speaking the truth will not keep the crimes down or make them go away.
In fact, if people don’t know they can’t trust moslims….they may hire them to take care of a loved one, allow them to move in to their homes, or give them a ride, or go for a ride with them and face terrible consequences.
Dave says
They are called asylum seekers for a good reason: They seek, and need, to be in an asylum. A lunatic asylum.
The Finnish authorities have realized that the truth is dangerous, and threatening to the government position.
In many countries, a large number of taxi drivers are Muslims.
Beverly says
That’s the way to go Finland. Bury your head in the sand (I would say some part of your body but that wouldn’t be nice) and pretend that everything is just fine. And when people start talking among themselves you will have a bigger problem than you do now.
sheliak says
What, the Finns can’t look right next door at Sweden and see how this see no evil attitude plays out?
GreekEmpress says
Evidently not.
Sweden even has an organization, “Nathatsgranskaren” (The Web Hate Investigator)
That allows Swedes to report their own citizens for so called “hate speech” against Muslims.
gravenimage says
Finland: Police barred from reporting about the crimes of asylum seekers
……………,..,…
More crushing of free speech and general suicidal insanity.
ntesdorf says
Around the World there is just too much violence and crime coming from Muslims for the MSM to fit reports of it in between the panic over Global Warming and reports of what Trump ate for breakfast that he should not have.
Rufolino says
The end result of this suppression of the truth and this disrespect for their own citizens, will in the long term be bloody.
Peter A says
“In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
George Orwell.
dan christensen says
How come that the most eager opponents of inter-European multiculti and supporters of European monoculti, loves and protects islamic monoculti ?
They prefer muslim monoculti rather than European multiculti ?
The European Elite is very confused about what monoculti and multiculti entails. Their confusion is very embarrasing, revealing their own incompetence and monodimensional political stupidity.
Islam is monoculti and abhors multiculti in any form or shape, so how can islam be a multiculti blessing, when they hate it ?
Garfield says
They love it because it tears down tradition Judeo- Christian society which they hate They are nihilisni who don’t think ahead or care about future generations
Proud Kaafir says
I thought Finns had good control over this Islamic pest. But recently I hear many negative stories from Finland.
Garfield says
Everyone please read the George Orwell novel 1984 of you haven’t already.