• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Hugh Fitzgerald: “Islamic Modernist” Mustafa Akyol Betrays More of His Worldview Than He Likely Intended (Part 2)

Jan 11, 2019 10:00 am By Hugh Fitzgerald

Since this point in history, however, Akyol said the Islamic world has begun to fall behind in the development of human rights.

The implication here is that the Islamic world was at one time equal to, or perhaps even superior to, the West in its recognition of human rights. When was this ever the case?

Let’s start with the rights of women. The deep misogyny of Islam guaranteed that the treatment of women was always behind that of the West. A husband has Qur’anic sanction to “beat” his wife (4:34); the status of men is always above that of women (4:228). The Muslim male could practice polygyny, and go unto his wives who are as a tilth to him (4:223); he could divorce any of his wives merely by uttering the triple-talaq. In Islam, daughters inherit half that of sons. A woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man. Muhammad himself justified this rule in a hadith: “it is because of the deficiency in her intelligence.”

As to the treatment of minorities, was Islam, which offered those conquered the options of death, conversion to Islam, or the permanent status of dhimmi (burdened with a host of disabilities), really superior to the West at one time, as Akyol claims? It’s true that in Western Christendom there were those who attacked and murdered Jews, based mainly on the blood libel, that is, the charge of ritual murder of Christian children, whose blood was supposedly used to make matzohs for Passover. There was nothing that bad in the Islamic treatment of Jews, for they could remain alive and practice their religion, as long as they met the conditions imposed on them as dhimmis. But we should also remember that the Qur’an has several dozen antisemitic verses, and sudden murderous Muslim outbursts against Jews were not unknown. The most striking example of this was in Granada in 1066, where the appointment of a Jew, Joseph ibn Naghrela, to be vizier to the Berber king, led to the killing of almost all of the 4,000 Jews in the city. Both Jews and Christians were not to be taken as friends, it says in the Qur’an, for they “are friends only with each other.”

Other human rights that finally came to be recognized, albeit very slowly, in the West, after the Enlightenment — including the right of freedom of speech, and of freedom of religion — never existed in the Islamic world, not 1400 years ago, not in medieval times, and not now. Any criticism of Islam or of Muhammad was treated as “blasphemy,” a charge which greatly limited “the freedom of speech.” As for “freedom of religion,” apostates from Islam could be executed. Unbelievers could practice their religion, but with so many disabilities, as dhimmis, that it would be inaccurate to describe this as “freedom of religion” as that is understood in the West. Many non-Muslims converted to Islam not out of conviction, but to escape the hardship and humiliation of being a dhimmi.

“In the face of this modern development [of human rights] … there is a friction today still between the modern definition of human rights and Islamic authorities and Islamic interpretations,” he [Mustafa Akyol] said.

Akyol said change is happening, but such massive change does not occur overnight.

The definition of human rights that the Muslim states adhere to is not the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but rather, those found in the very different “Islamic” version, known as the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights of 1990, which was put forth to promote the idea that Muslims, too, respected human rights. But it was very different in its effect from the Universal Declaration. The Cairo Declaration declares that all human rights must be subject to the Sharia. Thus the Cairo version upheld the unequal treatment of women and of non-Muslim minorities. Freedom of speech according to the Sharia does not include the freedom, by Muslim or non-Muslim, to “blaspheme” the Prophet or Islam in any way. Religious freedom, too, is limited, both for Muslims who can still be severely punished, even executed, for apostasy, and for non-Muslims, many of whom felt compelled to convert to Islam in order to escape the miserable condition of dhimmi, and especially the payment of the Jizyah.

“Now, are there Muslims trying to deal with this issue and offer this reformation? Yes,” he [Akyol] said. “There are Muslim rulers, intellectuals, institutions, countries — this is a thing that’s been going on for more than a century. It began in the 19th century, it’s still going on, the battle is still going on. Let me tell you, it’s not that easy and fast to change a culture and civilization.”

Akyol does not offer any evidence of this “reformation” succeeding. The would-be “reformers” of Islam came into existence in the late nineteenth-century, when the power of Muslims was at a low ebb; they recognized that the condition of Islamic peoples suggested that “reform,” or “modernization” as Akyol prefers to call it, was needed. He declares that it “has been going on for more than a century,” but the only country where real reformation — change — seemed to have succeeded was in his own country, Turkey, thanks to the forced secularization promoted by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. Ataturk was determined to limit the power of the religion as much as he could, for he was an atheist, convinced that Islam was holding his country back. He empowered women, giving them the right to vote before they won it even in Western Europe. He banned polygamy and the triple-talaq. He gave women the right to inherit equally with men. A woman’s testimony became equal to that of a man. Dress because un-islamized. Women were allowed to show themselves without the hijab. As for men, the fez and turban, identified with Islam, were abolished by the Hat Act of 1925; Turkish men began to wear suits in the Western manner. All of this was part of Ataturk’s campaign to secularise Turkish society. Nowhere else in the Islamic world was such a thoroughgoing attempt to de-emphasize Islam attempted.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Hugh Fitzgerald, Islamic reform, Moderate Muslims Tagged With: Mustafa Akyol


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Buraq says

    Jan 11, 2019 at 10:20 am

    As time passes, Islam’s inability to change and evolve means that this brutal ideology is becoming more and more anachronistic. From simply being out of step with the times, Islam can no longer find a place in modern, complex, industrialized, secular societies.
    These clowns that talk of ‘reform’ are fighting a hopeless, rearguard action to keep Islam relevant. It ain’t gonna work!

    • mortimer says

      Jan 11, 2019 at 11:41 am

      “New-Age” Islam.

    • Terry Gain says

      Jan 11, 2019 at 12:42 pm

      Talk about reform serves no purpose other than to disarm naive westerners and make the west easier to conquer. The last I heard Zhudi Jasser received a grand total of 5 replies from mosques in the United States to his Grand Reform Proposal.

      The reason that Islam can’t be reformed is of course because the Koran is believed to be the word of God. So how do you challenge the word of Allah? You don’t, not if you want to keep your liberty and your head.

      Not only is Islam not reforming, it is becoming more fundamentalist because of the effective advocacy of the Muslim Brotherhood. The reformers provide cover for the Muslim Brotherhood and are therefore more dangerous.

  2. Kuffar 'n Proud says

    Jan 11, 2019 at 11:07 am

    The “Islamic World” respects the Human rights of everyone and Muslims will murder anyone that has the Islamophobic notion to say otherwise!

  3. mortimer says

    Jan 11, 2019 at 11:37 am

    Mustafa Akyol hates Islam AS IT ACTUALLY IS … he hate the “ISLAM OF THE CONSENSUS” which is vicious, brutal, senseless, murderous, suspicious, pre-psychological, pre-rational and pre-scientific.

    Mustafa Akyol cannot STOMACH REAL ISLAM, so he has REJECTED about 70% of it. What he calls ‘ISLAM’, is actually a form of PICK-AND-CHOOSE ISLAM or CAFETERIA ISLAM or ISLAM-À-LA-CARTE.

    Mustafa Akyol has invented a NEW RELIGION TO HIS PERSONAL TASTE and simply IGNORED all elements of AUTHENTIC ISLAM that are unpalatable to him. This is known as …

    Kufrul-Istibdaal: Disbelief because of trying to substitute Allaah’s Laws (with man-made laws). This could take the form of:

    (a) Rejection of Allaah’s law (Sharee’ah) without denying it

    (b) Denial of Allaah’s law and therefore rejecting it, or

    (c) Substituting Allaah’s laws with man-made laws. Allaah subhanahu wa ta’ala says: Or have they partners with Allaah who have instituted for them a religion which Allaah has not allowed. [Soorah Shuraa(42), Ayah 8] Allaah subhanahu wa ta’ala says: Say not concerning that which your tongues put forth falsely (that) is lawful and this is forbidden so as to invent a lie against Allaah. Verily, those who invent a lie against Allaah will never prosper. [Soorah Nahl (16), Ayah 116]

  4. mortimer says

    Jan 11, 2019 at 11:39 am

    Mustafa Akyol has more or less abandoned Islam, but pretends to be a believer. He is a New Age theist with Muslim trappings.

    • Terry Gain says

      Jan 11, 2019 at 12:43 pm

      You don’t know that. He may just be engaging in Taqiyya.

      • Gwendolyn Elissale Mugliston says

        Jan 12, 2019 at 8:10 pm

        Yes, Terry Gain. that is exactly as I see it. I think it is incredibly stupid of us to believe anything a Muslim says…unless s/he says they are on jihad.

  5. Don McKellar says

    Jan 11, 2019 at 11:48 am

    “Islamic” and “Modernist” put together as a label? ahahahahahaha! Is that some kind of a joke?

  6. Nautikos says

    Jan 11, 2019 at 1:10 pm

    Good ol’ Mustafa is engaging in an elaborate exercise of ‘taqiyya’, the holy lie…

    • mortimer says

      Jan 12, 2019 at 1:02 am

      N. , Mustafa is lying to himself by pretending there was a different UR-ISLAM. The Arabs before Caliph Abd al Malik worshiped the Black Stone in Petra. After Abd al Malik, the Arabs worshiped Mohammed as a semi-divine figure with certain god-like qualities plus hypersexuality. Mustafa is trying to pretend that he can discover the ORIGINAL ISLAM, but Mohammed already told us that the ORIGINAL ISLAM is JIHAD.

      Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:
      I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction (become businessmen), hold the tails of oxen (become cattlemen), are pleased with agriculture (become farmers), and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your ORIGINAL RELIGION (the original Islam is jihad).

  7. gravenimage says

    Jan 11, 2019 at 11:13 pm

    Hugh Fitzgerald: “Islamic Modernist” Mustafa Akyol Betrays More of His Worldview Than He Likely Intended (Part 2)
    …………………..

    Islam has never had any respect for human rights.

  8. mortimer says

    Jan 12, 2019 at 1:12 am

    The reality of Islamic imperial history is that the Islamic state was a MEAT GRINDER for those of other religions. There were virtually no human rights for dhimmis. They were not allowed to sue a Muslim in court. They could only get a form of justice if they BRIBED THE MUSLIM OFFICIALS. Even then, they would normally side with the criminal Muslims against the Jews, Christians or Hindus.

    Dhimmis were CONSTANTLY being victimized for any reason and there was NOTHING they could do to prevent it, stop it or get any justice about it. This ongoing MEATGRINDER of persecution led many DHIMMIS to leave Muslim lands if they could do so.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • janicevanguilder on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Boycott Turkey on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Yogi on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Hoi Polloi on Why so many Muslims can’t wait for Biden to get inaugurated
  • Hoi Polloi on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.