“Councils across the UK are starting to adopt an agreed list of examples of Islamophobia.”
It was only a matter of time before the will of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation was embedded in the laws of Western nations in order to subvert Western freedoms. Even the previous sentence would be deemed “Islamophobic” according to the hit list circulating among councils in Britain, which is ultimately designed to shut down criticism of Islam by branding it “Islamophobic.”
The list of examples of “Islamophobia” does contain some things that must never tolerated in Western societies:
Calling for, aiding, instigating or justifying the killing or harming of Muslims in the name of a racist/fascist ideology, or an extremist view of religion.
Such actions are criminal, and it is already against the law in the UK and other free societies to call for violence against other human beings. No one in the West needs “anti-Islamophobia” (i.e., Sharia) tenets to prohibit what is already against Western laws.
But take a look at other criteria for “Islamophobia,” put forth by the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG):
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Muslims as such, or of Muslims as a collective group, such as, especially but not exclusively, conspiracies about Muslim entryism in politics, government or other societal institutions; the myth of Muslim identity having a unique propensity for terrorism and claims of a demographic ‘threat’ posed by Muslims or of a ‘Muslim takeover’.
No one has made up conspiracies about Muslims. The highest Islamic authorities in the world and many Muslim leaders routinely articulate themselves that the world is divided in two, and that the House of War (dar al-harb) that must be subjugated under the House of Islam (dar al-Islam). The Muslim Brotherhood Plan for North America also states:
The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.
Another example of Islamophobia provided by the All-Party Parliamentary Group:
Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.
Sharia is divine law to Muslims, and therefore is an “expression of Muslimness.” Thus any criticism of it will be deemed “Islamophobic.”
Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the most renowned and prominent Muslim cleric in the world, has stated of Muslims who leave Islam (apostates): “The Muslim jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them.” Al-Qaradawi also famously said in reference to the death penalty for apostasy: “If they had gotten rid of the apostasy punishment, Islam wouldn’t exist today.” is that not an “expression of Muslimness”? So now criticism of his words will be considered to be “rooted in racism.”
An official guidebook published in Canada by the Toronto District School Board also condemned “Islamophobia” and defined the term to include “dislike directed…towards Islamic politics or culture.” This guidebook was prepared with the support of the National Council of Canadian Muslims (CAIR-CAN). A followup National Post article rightly stated:
Banning or even discouraging any “dislike” of “Islamic politics” would make it nearly impossible to combat the virulent Jew-hatred that we have seen emanating from some Muslim institutions in Canada.
It does not take much acumen to recognize the wrongheadedness and malignant intentions of those who are working to impose “Islamophobia” restrictions upon free societies. So far, only “three local authorities have adopted APPG definition of Islamophobia,” but that’s three too many. The goal of all this is to subvert Western democracies under the Sharia. The West is rapidly moving toward the implementation of Sharia.
“COUNCILS across the UK are starting to adopt an agreed list of examples of Islamophobia,” Lancashire Telegraph, January 30, 2019:
COUNCILS across the UK are starting to adopt an agreed list of examples of Islamophobia.
However, so far, just three local authorities have adopted the APPG (All-Party Parliamentary Group) definition of Islamophobia. No councils in Lancashire have adopted the definition as yet.
Acts of Islamophobia from the list include accusing Muslim citizens of being more loyal to their countries of origin than to Britain, as well as accusing Muslims as a group of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Muslim person.
Oxford City council has this week become the latest in the UK to officially recognise the APPG definition which states:
“Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.”
The two other councils to adopt the definition are in London.
The list below states examples of Islamophobia that the councils now deem as unacceptable:
• Calling for, aiding, instigating or justifying the killing or harming of Muslims in the name of a racist/fascist ideology, or an extremist view of religion.
• Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Muslims as such, or of Muslims as a collective group, such as, especially but not exclusively, conspiracies about Muslim entryism in politics, government or other societal institutions; the myth of Muslim identity having a unique propensity for terrorism and claims of a demographic ‘threat’ posed by Muslims or of a ‘Muslim takeover’.
• Accusing Muslims as a group of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Muslim person or group of Muslim individuals, or even for acts committed by non-Muslims.
• Accusing Muslims as a group, or Muslim majority states, of inventing or exaggerating Islamophobia, ethnic cleansing or genocide perpetrated against Muslims.
• Accusing Muslim citizens of being more loyal to the ‘Ummah’ (transnational Muslim community) or to their countries of origin, or to the alleged priorities of Muslims worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
• Denying Muslim populations, the right to self-determination e.g., by claiming that the existence of an independent Palestine or Kashmir is a terrorist endeavour……
Terry Gain says
An ideology which provides for penalties for those who refuse to accept the ideology is per se evil and illegitimate. Once a country provides penalties for opposition to an ideology, it is no longer civilized. The conquest of Britain continues apace notwithstanding that Islam is not a legitimate ideology.
Barbara says
Totally agree! What about the UK Councils come after instances of Jewaphobia, Catholaphobia, Infidelaphobia and Christianaphobia?
What about the ILLEGAL Sharia Law Councils / Courts and what about the fact that PACE have CONDEMNED Islam as INCOMPATIBLE with HUMAN RIGHTS (a recent announcement – Jan 2019)
Save Europe says
The leaders of Western European countries – plus Trudeau in Canada are metaphorically ‘spinning plates’ in an attempt to prevent wars which will inevitably take place, 20-30 years from now.
Rufolino says
Agreed.
Governments in W.Europe are trying to put off the evil day.
They are pushing it into the future, and hoping that appeasement of Islam will keep Islam happy.
That hope is a vain one and utterly foolish. You only have to look at Islamic history anywhere.
Eventually it will come to blood.
mortimer says
This is ASYMMETICAL, as Barbara points out. This is no more than a frontal assault on the FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE and the FREEDOM OF RELIGION and the FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.
The UK needs a First Amendment in its constitution.
Steve says
The problem is, the longer the conflict is put off and the farther that sharia is allowed to creep in, when the conflict gets violent, which side will the government side with.
gravenimage says
Steve, the conflict has already gotten violent–all on the side of the invading Muslims.
gravenimage says
And Steve, you are right that Islam is–insanely–more and more protected in places like Britain.
Westman says
“Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Muslims as such, or of Muslims as a collective group, such as, especially but not exclusively, conspiracies about Muslim entryism in politics, government or other societal institutions; the myth of Muslim identity having a unique propensity for terrorism and claims of a demographic ‘threat’ posed by Muslims or of a ‘Muslim takeover’.
If this was 1930 and the word “Muslim” was replaced by “Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei” it would fit perfectly. Adopting It is nothing less than an invitation to tyranny.
jedothek says
As with so much “progressive ” propaganda, the cited screed exhibits a lack of interest in the truth. It condemns “Accusing Muslim citizens of being more loyal to the ‘Ummah’ (transnational Muslim community) … than to the interests of their own nations.” But, before condemning, any rational person would ask, Are such accusations true?
Michael Copeland says
“I am a traitor to America because my religion requires me to be.”
Samir Khan
“I am a Muslim living in Britain, and I give my allegiance only to Allah.”
Sayful Islam (Ishtiaq Alamgir) 2004
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/terror-on-the-dole-6939907.html
“We’re not American, we’re Muslim.”
Sharifa Alkhateeb
North American Council for Muslim Women
https://gellerreport.com/2019/01/muslim-leader-convert-all-americans-2islam.html/
Barbara says
No Muslim (including those born in a Western country) should be given Citizenship – in fact the UK, America etc should repeal all Citizenships of Muslims in their country.
Muslim’s should be repatriated back to their Islamic country – paid for by George Soros, Lefties and Muslim countries.
C.Michael Seibert says
Correct! Sharia Law & the Quran require the overthrow of the country with her in to convert it to sharia law and Islam! There is no wiggle room there is no such thing as a moderate Islam. Under Hussein Obama, Why did DHLS remove any reference to islam as a threat but the threat of Christian’s remain ? Really what do you not understand? You have not study Islam’s history. There are a number of FBI good guys counter terrorist that have been trying to get the Truth out about islam. However, this stupid UK council, is suicide! “There is nothing more terrifying than ignorance in action.”
Subject: You must watch this ! THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ‘Project’ – a plan to takeover the West | BARE NAKED ISLAM
Try publically speaking badly of Islam, see how quickly something, is done about you. CAIR will be all over you. You do not get this, are just not looking. Name just one Muslim country that has complete freedom of religion? You must watch this ! THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ‘Project’ – a plan to takeover the West | BARE NAKED ISLAM
http://www.barenakedislam.com/…/the-muslim-brotherhood…/
THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ‘Project’ – a plan to takeover the West
The Muslim Brotherhood ‘Project’ was drafted in 1982 when current tensions and terrorist activities in the Middle East were still very nascent. In many respects, The ‘Project’ is extremely prescient for outlining the bulk of Islamist action, whether by “moderate” Islamist organizations or terror groups, over the past two decades.
FBI to Seek Counseling, Not Handcuffs, for Some Islamic State Suspects http://www.frontpagemag.com/…/the-fbi-and-the-muslim…/ link to The FBI and the Muslim Brotherhood. You see the difference in how they handled the arrest of Roger Stone & his deaf wife.
Faced with a wave of potential homegrown terrorists, the FBI embarks on a new approach to help prevent people from turning violent and open this. You will see why people are seriously worried about going to the FBI it is loaded with Muslums of course, this was part of the “Islamophobia project”.
By DEVLIN BARRETT
Aug. 5, 2015 6:04 p.m. ET
Faced with a wave of potential homegrown Islamic State supporters, the Federal Bureau of Investigation is embarking on a new approach with some suspects: putting them in counseling rather than handcuffs.
Ex-Navy Seal throws Qur’an, accuses Obama of ‘treason’ – World Bulletin
In a Tea Party meeting, ex-Navy Seal soldier Ben Smith accused the Obama administration of supporting Al-Qaeda.
WORLDBULLETIN.NET
Actor Steven Seagal appeared at the Western Conservative Conference in Phoenix on February 22, 2014 where he called for the impeachment of President Obama for the interplay with six Muslim brotherhood cabinet members, Globalist media was silent.
YOUTUBE.COM
Clock Boy, was a CAIR /MB set up from the beginning. When is the last time you saw a Juvenal’s picture and full face, name released to the TV ?? And their father was a Memeber of CAIR.
What ‘clock boy’ that took a part a 1984 Radio Shack clock, Ahmed Mohamed has been up to since his ‘bomb’ arrest
View Photos Ahmed Mohamed, 14, became an overnight sensation when he was detained after a high school teacher mistook a homemade clock he brought to class for a bomb. This is more of the same idiocy the “Islaophobia project” of the Muslim Brotherhood is in your face! Polically Correct morons join in to collectively commit suicide for their fellow countrymen that do not want to subscribe to sharia law! ?
Dave says
Barbara, only another Vicktor Orban would be strong enough to do the right thing!
James Lincoln says
To use a medical analogy…
The UK is being destroyed by a metastasizing cancer called Islam.
Treatment options are rapidly becoming futile and hospice care is on the horizon.
WPM says
+1
England is dying from the disease Islamitis
the cure is to elect anti-bodies of officials into office who see the danger of this disease and willing to fight it ,not to pad their pockets, or virtual signal they are progressive , who are not afraid of being called defenders of tradition Western civilization, and stop importing more parasites that are eating the patient alive.
Savvy Kafir says
Support Anne Marie Waters’ For Britain party. That is Britain’s only hope at this point.
People outside the UK can become members and make monthly donations of any amount. If you care about the future of Britain, please do it!
Barbara says
What about Britain First – they are incredible as they have stood up for TRUTH and exposed the lies of Islam – they have been imprisoned, beaten up for “hate speech” / TRUTH!! They need all the support that can be mustered!
Anjuli Pandavar says
I think we are on firmer ground with Tommy Robinson and Gerrard Batten (forget about their current political affiliations. These are fluid, and dangerous, times).
The OIC, the Arab League, the Muslim Brotherhood and the EU leadership are panicking (which first showed in the vicious way in which the EU Parliament turned on Victor Orban a few months ago) and calculating that, ready or not, they have to act now. Macron’s red-carpeting ISIS trained soldiers back to France, the merging of France and Germany, the blanket “Islamophobia” diktat to British local councils, etc., I see as panicked reactions to the widespread backlash against the Muslim invasion, rampant Islamisation and deep official contempt towards citizens, to disaffection amongst the police and armed forces (especially in the UK and France), to the crumbling of the idea that “populism” is a bad thing, to the EU fracturing on several fronts, to countries that were in line for adopting the euro now retreating from that idea, to Danish, Visegrád and Italian actions against Muslims being well-received, to the seemingly untiring, spreading and increasingly on-target yellow-vest movement, to Islam having failed to impress, whether intellectually, culturally or morally, to the collapse of the Iran Nuclear Deal, to creeping, but definitely increasing, fairness towards and acceptance of Israel (whether through recognition that it is a victim of jihad or whether through a simple sense of fair play), etc. It’s a combination of rapidly-escalating scenarios that threaten to coalesce into a perfect storm that will derail the EU’s ability to deliver up Europe to Islam. In light of this, I think that the diktat to the UK councils, Macron inviting the Islamic State to reestablish itself in France (keep in mind that Muslims in France have tended to keep well clear of the Yellow Vest movement) and the merging of the French and German militaries, are all pre-emptive counter-revolutionary strikes.
dan christensen says
Brilliant piece. It is always amazing, how much the world craves to be deceived – the smallest common denominator is always sought for. A residue from the days when the common ancestor of man and apes were the norm ?
Mike Stevens says
Sharia might be considered “divine law”, but that’s not the view of the European courts, here is one of their judgements – ” “The report addresses several problematic aspects of Sharia law, including the superiority of men over women, the rules governing marriage, the inhuman punishment for certain crimes, the absence of freedom of religion and the discriminatory status of Christians and Jews. It concludes that Sharia law is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, in line with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).”
Incompatible. But now that Britain is to leave the EU, its Muslim community won’t have to worry about anything negative from European courts.
Tom says
Eight percent of the population dictating to the other 92% what they can and can’t think, say or do. So much for a free and democratic society in the UK.
A takeover and submission doesn’t have to involve guns or violence as long as you have a nation made up of sheep.
Save Europe says
Six percent.
gravenimage says
Grimly true. I just hope Britons don’t prove to be so ovine after all…
Dave says
Tom: Lambs to the slaughter. Like the Jews at Auschwitz. Why are we so willing to allow this nonsense? These insane councillors should be replaced.
somehistory says
One is no longer free to be afraid. And yet, that is the emotion that moslims want everyone to show…that is the *reason* for terror…”to strike fear in the heart and mind through terror.” But it is now illegal to be in fear. How logical is that?
The phobia includes “• Accusing Muslims as a group, or Muslim majority states, of inventing or exaggerating Islamophobia,”
So one is showing the “fear” if they point out that moslims have lied and fabricated an incident, a “hoax” so as to get more attention and claims of the “phobia.”
A female moslim fabricates a story, tells the police that a ‘White male, wearing a ball cap and jacket, pulled on her scarf and said go back where you came from.”
All of the men who fit that description deny that they pulled any scarves or told any moslim to go back anywhere. Some of them may say that it “didn’t happen.” And by this, they have committed the “phobia” crime.
Revelation 13 Bowing to the “wild beast” in order to keep living and carrying on in one’s daily endeavors of life. The British authorities are increasingly just lying down, ceasing to resist the evil.
gravenimage says
Even worse, they are often themselves enforcing Shari’ah norms, as here, where no one can say anything critical of Islam.
somehistory says
Yes, snakes helping the snakes to take over and bring others to silence and eventual death. So many moslims are in the governments, and so many others are helping them reach their goal of tyranny over the whole of mankind. Not much difference…if any…between the moslim and his non moslim cohort and henchmen.
gravenimage says
Yes–dhimmi enablers of Islam are as dangerous as Muslims.
Michael Copeland says
“…claims of a demographic ‘threat’ posed by Muslims or of a ‘Muslim takeover’” are Islamophobia and “unacceptable”.
Really?
“Look at the development of the population in Europe, where the number of Muslims increases like mosquitoes. … By 2050, 30% of the European population will be Muslim…”
Mullah Krekar of Norway.
https://www.memri.org/reports/iraqi-ansar-al-islam-commander-mullah-krekar-norway-‘no-peace-between-west-islam-until
“Islam will invade Europe and America….the Jihad will lead to smashing Western civilization and replacing it with Islam …..”
Mohammed Mahdi Akef,
“We are not here to adopt Western values, we are here to colonize the U.S. (and Canada) and spread Islamic sharia law.”
Tariq Ramadan
https://gatesofvienna.net/2018/03/tariq-ramadan-lies-about-jihad/
“Islam Will Dominate”
Placard held by muslims
gravenimage says
Good post, Michael.
Michael Woodman says
And thus is established one of the fundamental inequalities between Muslims and non-Muslims under Sharia: Muslims can criticise others but they cannot be criticised.
Mike Stevens says
100% correct. As I said in a previous post, one of the things the European courts cited in judging that Sharia law is incompatible with European (and all civilised) societies was just that – “the absence of freedom of religion and the discriminatory status of Christians and Jews”. Tolerance is a two way street, right?
gravenimage says
Spot on, Michael and Mike.
Geoffrey de Brito says
The UK has volunteered to witness to the world an object lesson in allowing the barbarian to enter civilization’s gate…
BTW, that’s not Islamophobic because only barbarians embrace totalitarian ideologies and Islam, as written down in Allah’s Qur’an… is a barbaric, totalitarian ideology that wraps itself in a facade of religious pretense…
Terry Gain says
The religious aspects of Islam are irrational but the political aspects of this supremacist totalitarian ideology are ingenious. Islam is always the victim, even when it is the aggressor. How dare we criticize the heartfelt religious beliefs of Muslims. We are awful people.
gravenimage says
Yes–there is a certain thuggish cunning from Muslims.
Brian hoff says
Some poster on this site post that Bosnian Serb didnot rape Bosnian moslim women or operate rape camp. Or the serb didnot carry out clear out muslim people out of Bosnian.
gravenimage says
“Some poster”, huh? Citations, please.
The difference is that civilized people oppose rape wherever it occurs–whereas, “Brian hoff”–really, “DefenderofIslam”–has said that as soon as Muslims gain enough power that they will impose brutal Shari’ah law, which would legalize the rape of Infidels and their use as sex slaves, as well as the rape of little girls in child “marriage”.
The “Prophet” Muhammed and his companions were themselves rapists. In several Hadith, the “Prophet” even chides his thuggish companions for *not* raping their captives (they were hoping for higher ransoms–he told them it was “Allah’s” will that they rape the women anyway). *Ugh*.
Brian hoff says
There where people on this site who said that 20 000 to 50 000 rape of muslim women in Bosnian didnot happen it was make up by the muslim and media. I worder if you are than supporter of the Serbian warcriminal. Many where fround guilty by the warcrime court of the UN. Did you know Stalin murder about 80 000 polish officer in 1939. When the germany occupy that part of poleland in 1941 they uncover the mass grave an report it. The america and British knew Stalin did it. For the long time the pole said the nazie did it.
WPM says
Please give a reference to the post you are talking about that you claim was posted on this site that the rape of Moslem women in Bosnian was called fake news by someone on Jihad watch? There are no one here at Jihad watch defending Stalin ,America entered WWII in December 1941 after Hitler and Stalin butcher many Poles, what does this have to do with debating or giving out information on the pros and cons of Islam and Islamic belief as stated in the above article?? Islam is a religion, and a political idolatry ,like communism, capitalism , and Nazism it is open to debate on what it stands for ,it practices , laws ,rules, merits, faults , its history ,its damage it has caused to mankind over its 1400 year history ,and if there are any pluses to it. It does not need protection under the law from people talking or criticize it, you can criticize the Catholic church ,or the Jewish faith .You can take the books of those faiths and public debate what the laws, rules , and how they effect us today in out times. You can debate a religion core mission ,what laws it holds to its followers , and what laws it trys to enforce on unbelievers .How tolerant it is to people who do not want to follow the laws put forth with that faith .How logical is that faith ,does that faith contradict common western law. The Nazis kill many people in Eastern Europe, Stalin was a mass murder ,America and England lost many young men beating Hitler ,what is your point??America fought a 45 year “cold war” after WWII with Russia what does this have to do with giving special protection to the debating ,pointing out the facts in the teachings, books, papers , history of the pros and cons of political Islam????
gravenimage says
Fine reply, WPM.
mortimer says
THE REVERSE IS TRUE … they are claiming the MIRROR IMAGE of what JIHAD is … these claims are PSYCHOLOGICAL PROJECTION !!!
Quote: “Calling for, aiding, instigating or justifying the killing or harming of Muslims in the name of a racist/fascist ideology, or an extremist view of religion.”
Let us change the names: “Islamic teachings that … call for, aid, instigate or justify the killing or harming of NON-MUSLIMS in the name of a racist/fascist ideology and theology, or an extremist view of the Mohammedan religion.”
gravenimage says
UK councils across the country are adopting agreed-upon official list of examples of “Islamophobia”
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Muslims as such, or of Muslims as a collective group, such as, especially but not exclusively, conspiracies about Muslim entryism in politics, government or other societal institutions; the myth of Muslim identity having a unique propensity for terrorism and claims of a demographic ‘threat’ posed by Muslims or of a ‘Muslim takeover’.
……………………………
Alas, this last is not a “myth”. Orthodox Islam calls for the murder of Infidels until they can be forced to submit to Islam. Britain is making it illegal to tell this obvious truth.
More:
Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.
……………………………
What rot–Islam is not a race.
And some of those “expressions of Muslimness” include FGM, “Honor Killings”, killing apostates, and rape and murder of Infidels.
More:
Sharia is divine law to Muslims, and therefore is an “expression of Muslimness.” Thus any criticism of it will be deemed “Islamophobic.”
……………………………
Grimly true.
More:
However, so far, just three local authorities have adopted the APPG (All-Party Parliamentary Group) definition of Islamophobia.
……………………………
This *may* be a good sign…
More:
Accusing Muslim citizens of being more loyal to the ‘Ummah’ (transnational Muslim community) or to their countries of origin, or to the alleged priorities of Muslims worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
……………………………
This is so often the case as to be the norm, because this is what Islam demands. But we are not supposed to notice…
More:
Denying Muslim populations, the right to self-determination e.g., by claiming that the existence of an independent Palestine or Kashmir is a terrorist endeavour……
……………………………
In other words, Muslims have the right to take over and destroy India and Israel.
How long before they start making the same demands in Britain?
More:
Accusing Muslims as a group, or Muslim majority states, of inventing or exaggerating Islamophobia, ethnic cleansing or genocide perpetrated against Muslims.
……………………………
So now it is “Islamophobic” to notice that Muslims are using false claims of Islamophobia…
We are in truly Orwellian territory here…
John says
They talk about moslems, so just continue to bag the Shit out of islam and muhammad(MHCRIH)
TruthHonestReality says
“ Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Muslims as such, or of Muslims as a collective group, such as, especially but not exclusively, conspiracies about Muslim entryism in politics, government or other societal institutions; the myth of Muslim identity having a unique propensity for terrorism and claims of a demographic ‘threat’ posed by Muslims or of a ‘Muslim takeover’.”
The funny thing is that people can do all of these same exact things against conservatives and President Trump supporters and not only is it completely allowed and they will in fact never be called out of face any media or legal backlash EVER.
You can destroy someone online or in real life and obviously the online slander will lead to real life loss of your job and then a tumbling financial hell in which you lose your house and even your marriage and children but no one cares when it’s a conservative.
All this leads to sharia and l will never understand why leftists think certain people receive preferential treatment. All this started with the racist ‘affirmative action’ policy here in America – l have no idea how & why it started in the UK, perhaps someone could enlighten me?
Mike Lyons says
One can be wonder if there will be equal application without bias towards the criticism of other ethnic or religious groups such as Christians, Buddhist, or Hindus etc? The bias and hypocrisy of this “Islamaphobe” rubbish is beyond imagination.
infidel says
Vow: What Islam is denying here is what it exactly does. But more mind boggling ls they way these UK councils are taken for a ride by these smooth talking salesmen of Jehaad. But then the UK has embarked on a suicidal course along with Canada, France, Germany, and Sweden…
infidel says
Did U guys the INSIDIOUS last clause.. let me quote
Denying Muslim populations, the right to self-determination e.g., by claiming that the existence of an independent Palestine or Kashmir is a terrorist endeavour……
So this means that if tomorrow, the growing Muslim enclaves in the Greater West ask for secession and forming their own Islamic republics, the khafir must agree ..else it is Islamophobia..
gravenimage says
Exactly, Infidel. I cited this clause and its implications for Britain and the rest of the West, above.
No Muzzies Here says
The implementation of Sharia is moving right along.
Brenrod says
Islamaphobia and Nazi phobia are the same thing, both concern creed’s of hatred, intolerance and murder and neither are racist as they are for use of the Proliferation of heinous belief systems.
Brenrod says
Correction: both concern the fear of The proliferation of heinous Beliefs .
Anjuli Pandavar says
Truth be told, I’m really alarmed by how fast things are coming to a head. Am I correct in seeing France as on the brink of a revolution? The citizens on one side against their rulers, the banks, the EU and the yet to be mobilised armed Muslim militias (who will have their own priorities), while the armed forces and the police can go either way? Is the UK Plan B? I imagine the Yellow Vests across Europe will have to be ready and able to rapidly reimpose national borders, de facto ending Schengen, so that *they* control movement, and not the EU leadership.
Dave says
“Islam is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets non-muslims.
• Muslims are calling for, aiding, instigating or justifying the killing or harming of non-Muslims in the name of a racist/fascist ideology, or an extremist view of religion.
• Muslims are responsible for real wrongdoing committed by groups of Muslim individuals, or even for acts committed by Muslims, such as rape gangs.
• Muslims as a group, or Muslim majority states, have invented Islamophobia, and are compelled to carry out ethnic cleansing or genocide perpetrated against non-Muslims.
• Making truthful, verifiable, epitomising allegations about Muslims as such, or of Muslims as a collective group, such as, especially but not exclusively, exposing the truth about Muslim entryism in politics, government or other societal institutions; the obvious truth about Muslim identity having a unique propensity for terrorism and claims of a demographic ‘threat’ posed by Muslims or of a ‘Muslim takeover’.
• Muslim populations, should have the right to self-determination in their own countries, but cannot claim that the existence of an independent Palestine or Kashmir is not a terrorist endeavour……