The ADL consistently fails to notice the existence of anti-Semitism on the Left, as well as Islamic anti-Semitism. Even worse, it defames and demonizes those who call attention to and oppose Islamic anti-Semitism (including me). The ADL is not really operating in defense of Jews anymore; it is just another propaganda arm of the Left, advancing a hard-Left agenda that turns a blind eye to anti-Semitism.
“ADL Goes Dark On A Democrat’s Latest Ties To Anti-Semitism,” by Peter Hasson, Daily Caller, February 1, 2019 (thanks to Blazing Cat Fur):
The left-leaning Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the nation’s largest Jewish civil rights group, has declined to weigh in on Democratic Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s latest tie to anti-Semitism.
A key fundraiser for Tlaib, Maher Abdel-qader, repeatedly promoted anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, an investigation by The Daily Caller News Foundation revealed Monday.
TheDCNF on Wednesday spoke on the phone with ADL communications director Todd Gutnick to request the ADL’s position on the controversy. Gutnick said he was unfamiliar with the matter and requested an email with a link to the story, which TheDCNF sent immediately after the phone call.
Then Gutnick went dark: he declined to return multiple emails and voicemails from TheDCNF on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday morning.
Tlaib is a member of a Facebook group that Abdel-qader founded, “Palestinian American Congress,” where he and others have repeatedly shared anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
Abdel-qader has since claimed that he didn’t know the anti-Semitic content was anti-Semitic when he repeatedly promoted it on social media.
Tlaib posted multiple pictures of herself with Abdel-qader on Facebook during the campaign and emphasized how important his support was to her. Pictures that Abdel-qader posted show him speaking at campaign events.
The ADL’s silence on Tlaib comes after she ignored their call to denounce Abbas Hamideh, a Palestinian activist who has openly supported Hezbollah and compared Israelis to Nazis. Hamideh attended Tlaib’s swearing-in ceremony and took a picture with her, which he then posted to social media.
“We ask her to clarify his attendance and denounce his anti-Semitism,” wrote ADL head Jonathan Greenblatt, a former member of the Obama administration.
Tlaib has yet to denounce the rhetoric of either Hamideh or Abdel-qader.
She told the Detroit Free Press that she didn’t know Hamideh. That conflicts with what Hamideh told The Daily Caller: Though the two aren’t close friends, “she knows me well, don’t get me wrong, and I know her well through her campaign and stuff like that— like we’ve met numerous times and numerous events.”
The closest Tlaib came to a condemnation of Hamideh was saying she does “not agree with the statements brought to my attention.”
Nine months before her swearing-in, Tlaib posted a selfie with Hamideh to her personal Facebook account.
Ferdinand (@StFerdinandIII) says
Mein Koran is more anti-Christian or Christianophobic than it is Anti-Semitic. I am 100% against anti-Semitic racism. However, there is nary a voice in the wilderness crying about Christianophobia which soaks Mein Koran from end to end (1572 verses of hate speech against the Infidels, a large % target Christians).
I want to see movies, books and angst over the slaughter, rape, hate and violence against Christians perpetrated by Muhammadans (their rightful name), over 1400 years including 10 million white Christian slaves and tens of thousands of young white girls, today, now, sex-enslaved in Europe by Muhammadan gangs.
mortimer says
Agreed. The Koran’s ‘rant’ is that Allah hates ‘wrong-worshippers’ and has commissioned Mohammedans to hurt them, rob them and enslave them. The Koran is a troop-motivator.
The stated purpose of the ADL is to fight: “anti-Semitism and all forms of bigotry (in the United States) and abroad, combat international terrorism, probe the roots of hatred” .
The ADL should ‘probe the ROOTS OF HATRED’ found in the foundational source texts of Islam.
christianblood says
Mortimer
(…Our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the RULERS, against the AUTHORITIES, against the POWERS of this dark world and against the SPIRITUAL FORCES OF EVIL in the heavenly realms…)
Eph 6:12
J D S says
Anyone want to know where Stan is?…He’s alive and in full Armour in Islam fighting to steal all the Christians he can before he is chained in that awful Lake of Fire.
gravenimage says
Both hatred of Christians and hatred of Jews in Islam are horrifying.
There *was* a mainstream movie about the Armenian Genocide in 2017, “The Promise”, starring Christian Bale. I have not seen it yet, but from what I’ve heard the film was quite good, but was more a romance set against the backdrop of war than anything else. I don’t think that there was any understanding that the genocide had anything to do with Islam.
This, from a review:
Ara Sarafian, director of the Gomidas Institute in London and a leading historian of the Armenian Genocide, praised the film for its historical accuracy. “The key themes were historically accurate”, he said. “The producers did not take license to go beyond the historical material at hand yet they managed to capture much of the enormity of the Armenian genocide”. Sarafian also commended director Terry George for his “well balanced and creditworthy” sense of history.
There have been a handful of other films about the genocide made over the years, including “Ravished Armenia” from 1919, when the genocide was still going on, but they have been pretty thin on the ground.
And I think that there has been even less about other Muslim savagery against Christians and Jews.
GreekEmpress says
Graven Image,
See “The Promise”! I read it’s out on DVD now. I don’t think you’ll be disappointed. Also, the movies “The Cut” and “Ararat” I have seen and are also very good.
I’m just very blessed my ancestors got out of Turkey when they did, otherwise I wouldn’t be here.
gravenimage says
Thank you, GreekEmpress. I will see it.
I’m glad your ancestors got out of Turkey, as well. The story is the same with Robert Spencer.
Terry Gain says
Your ancestors fled Turkey and then you became a Greek Empress. You are truly indebted to them. 🙂
christianblood says
gravenimage posted
(…Both hatred of Christians and hatred of Jews in Islam are horrifying…)
Have you asked your self why Jewish liberals in the US love Islamists like
(Rashida Tlaib) and even vote for them while demonizing main stream Christian nationalists calling them racists and anti-Semites?
gravenimage says
The problem is with Leftists in general, not Jews specifically.
But christianblood *hates* Jews–note that he has no problem with Rashida Tlaib at all. He has indicated many times that he strongly supports the Jihad against Israel, including seeking her utter destruction.
Ernie says
Besmirching Jews again , ” christianblood ” ? You sound awfully close to a NAZI . I for myself even think that YOU ARE A NAZI ( and beyond help ) .
christianblood says
Graven & Ernie
Can we have some honest discussion without throwing around lies, labels and accusations? My question is why do American Jewish liberals (like the ADL) love and collude with Islamists like (Rashida Tlaib) and many others while they demonize & denigrate main stream Christian nationalists calling them racists, anti-Semites, etc?
Ernie says
Throwing around LIES , LABELS , and ACCUSATIONS . “christianblood”: it seems if you are doing these things , it’s allright ( in your own eyes ofcourse ) ; and when other people are adressing you of your LIES , LABELS and FALSE ACCUSATIONS , or your representation of a deliberately twisted truth , then it’s wrong . Before you accuse others , it’s fair to have a good look at yourself , ” christianblood “. Many things you’ve said fall into a peculiar pattern . And that pattern looks awfully close to the ideology of NATIONAL-SOCIALISM = NAZISM in my eyes .
gravenimage says
christianblood wrote:
Graven & Ernie
Can we have some honest discussion without throwing around lies, labels and accusations?
………………………….
Note that christianblood never actually denies that he hates Jews, nor that he seeks the destruction of Israel. But why would he? He has said these things many times. Here, he actually shares the agenda of Rashida Tlaib.
More:
My question is why do American Jewish liberals (like the ADL) love and collude with Islamists like (Rashida Tlaib) and many others while they demonize & denigrate main stream Christian nationalists calling them racists, anti-Semites, etc?
………………………….
As I have noted many times, liberals–including Jewish liberals–often consider Muslims “needy refugees”, and buy into the marketing of Muslim democrats in Congress like Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib as “progressive”. They want to ignore evidence like the above to the contrary.
The biggest supporters of Tlaib have been those like Nancy Pelosi, who is not Jewish.
Here’s a good piece from Front Page Magazine on Tlaib’s image as a “progressive”:
“Rashida Tlaib’s Progressive Window Dressing”
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/272485/rashida-tlaibs-progressive-window-dressing-pedro-gonzalez
reluctantly_antiLeft says
What gravenimage says.
Clear example, Bernie.
The Left wants to see thru the lens of Western human universalism and human rights, dignity and respect, and to boil down all problems to resolvable economic solutions. Tru nuff, one of the key factors found in marriage breakups is arguing over money, which would point to lack of finances. (Or it could be a spouse who spends recklessly or who resents the inability to spend recklessly on stuff to boost egos, show off, and fill emptiness.)
Tru nuff, adding more money can solve problems that ARE rooted in lack of money.
Tru nuff, Western conflicts are often resolved in compromise when they hit a wall. The republican system is based on that, fighting for principles but also pragmatism and compromise. (Islam? No compromise.)
Even on the Palestine issue, it would seem, from a western propertarian small “L” liberal democratic perspective, that the conflict could be settled with a bigger land-for-peace swap combined with freedom and autonomy for the people of West Bank and Gaza. Remove the Settlements. Then settle down as neighbors and trading partners until the Sun explodes in however many millions of years.
Israel has the upper hand. Why does the State of Israel appear so stubborn about compromise and blaming?
Land and autonomy is doable. There’s justified (from a western perspective) grievances and resentments over the past on both sides. Just stop making future resentments.
Seems to make sense.
But this is an eternal religious blood feud.
This is what Spencer points out in the Quran (and related books) and in the Hamas Charter. Land for peace? Compromise? Not a single square meter of the entire Eretz israel aka Palestine can be under anything but superior Muslim rule. Why? Allah commands. Even beyond individual choice of Muslims … except if one chooses to be a somewhat disobedient or slacker Muslim and risk burning in Hellfire, with Allah’s expanded poetry of eternal torture.
People of India on the Right pointed out that Leftists in India, formerly connected to the Soviet Union, cannot see current and past conflicts, including centuries of conquest by Muslim armies, outside of the scope of Marxian scientific materialism & economic history. To Marx, Materialism (means of production, sharing of wealth) are the basis of Class Conflict, not fairy tales and traditions about Gawd which are secondary and not of much serious influence.
Well, okay, in bleeding edge modern semi-socialist Northern Europe, European France (in contrast with Islamic France), etc., maybe that viewpoint carries more weight.
Yet it is just as often wealthy and well educated Muslims who join up with Jihad, especially if it’s an Islamic education.
Rod says
Ferdinand wants to see “movies, books and angst over the slaughter, rape, hate and violence against Christians” over 1400 years.
I don’t suppose, Ferdinand, that you’d like to know about the slaughter, rape, hate and violence waged BY Christians against millions of NON-Christians in North America, South America, New Zealand, Australia, Africa, Asia and various other places.
You won’t have to go back 1400 years. It all happened quite recently, and there are mountains of evidence. (I’m not talking about slavery, but it shouldn’t be overlooked.)
You’ll be disappointed, no doubt, that the perpetrators of these atrocities were Christians, not Muslims, though Muslims were often the victims.
Ho hum – probably not relevant to those uninterested in reality.
gravenimage says
Actually, there are lots of movies–and books, magazine articles, etc–on these topics.
That is because Christians are capable of self criticism and reevaluation.
Note, also, that none of this behavior is mandated by Christianity–just the opposite, in fact. That is why, in fact, that there were so many devout Christians in the abolition movement. There has, of course, been no such movement in the Muslim world, In fact, slavery continues in Dar-al-Islam to this day, and all on Islamic terms.
And the idea that you have to go back 1400 years to find Muslim violence is utterly absurd. Why would “Rod” think that readers at Jihad Watch are ignorant of Jihad?
Rod says
Why would gi habitually ignore what Rod says, and instead tell us what he usually wrongly imagines Rod “thinks”? Perhaps what Rod “says” is too hard to deal with. And isn’t it Ferdinand who wants to go back 1400 years?
However, as for none of this behaviour “mandated by Christianity” – your unfamiliarity with real history, gi, is distressing. Christians have been killing for their god for centuries. To take one very obvious example, have a look at the story of the conquistadores. You won’t like it – wholesale slaughter, unspeakable sadistic cruelty, unimaginable levels of greed and theft, not a Muslim in sight, (but lots of forced conversions to the one true faith).
Devout Christians in the abolition movement? Of course there were. Also passionate humanitarians. No devout Christians among the hundreds of legislators who legalised and regulated slavery? Among the slave traders? Slave owners ? (and let’s not start naming names, for god’s sake).
As I said – Ho hum – probably not relevant to those uninterested in reality.
gravenimage says
More from “Rod”:
Why would gi habitually ignore what Rod says, and instead tell us what he usually wrongly imagines Rod “thinks”? Perhaps what Rod “says” is too hard to deal with. And isn’t it Ferdinand who wants to go back 1400 years?
………………………….
Note that “Rod” is unable to cite anything I got wrong. This should not surprise.
And no–Ferdinand referred to Islamic violence over the past 1400 years–one need not go back 1400 years to find Muslim violence, as “Rod” pretends. In fact, there have been thousands of Jihad terror attacks against Christians just since 9/11.
More:
However, as for none of this behaviour “mandated by Christianity” – your unfamiliarity with real history, gi, is distressing.
………………………….
I have a degree in history. The claim that I am unfamiliar with history is quite baseless.
And there is *no* violence mandated by Christianity. One need only read the Gospels to know that this is true.
Note that “Rod” is unable to point to any Christian mandate for violence.
More:
Christians have been killing for their god for centuries. To take one very obvious example, have a look at the story of the conquistadores. You won’t like it – wholesale slaughter, unspeakable sadistic cruelty, unimaginable levels of greed and theft, not a Muslim in sight, (but lots of forced conversions to the one true faith).
………………………….
The Conquistadores, of course, were not acting on the mandates of Christianity at all. And the implication that I am unfamiliar with this period of history is, of course, absurd. I have written about this here several times.
I have never once said that Christians have historically been incapable of evil. I just noted–quite accurately–that the Gospels do not preach violence. Where can “Rod” show that it does?
More:
Devout Christians in the abolition movement? Of course there were. Also passionate humanitarians. No devout Christians among the hundreds of legislators who legalised and regulated slavery? Among the slave traders? Slave owners ? (and let’s not start naming names, for god’s sake).
………………………….
Yes, there were Christians who tried to defend slave-owning on religious grounds. They were eventually far outnumbered by those who cited their Christian faith to show the immorality of slavery.
In fact, slavery has been *abolished* in the West.
It was never abolished in the Muslim world, and still continues to this day.
Jesus was not a slave-owner, instead, he ministered to slaves. The “Prophet” Muhammed, however, *was* a slave owner, and a slave trader, and enslaved his victims.
Respected Islamic institutions of learning like Al-Azhar condone slavery, and all on orthodox Islamic grounds.
More:
As I said – Ho hum – probably not relevant to those uninterested in reality.
………………………….
Uh huh–said by someone trying to distract from the bloody savagery of Islam by going back centuries to find failings by Christians…
Rod says
Well gi, as a history graduate you’d know that it’s historic fact that vast populations of the indigenous peoples of the Americas were decimated after the arrival of white Christians. Many were killed or converted to the Christian faith at the point of the sword, many died in defence of their lands, many died in other ways as a direct result of white invasion. Vast quantities of silver and gold were stolen from them and shipped back to Europe, much of it used to build and decorate Christian churches. Christian missions were set up by these invaders to convert native peoples. Their churches and their adherents are still there.
Importantly, none of this was “mandated by Christianity”, even though committed by Christians, so somehow these occurrences (note, I’m not saying “crimes” or “atrocities”) shouldn’t be compared with the crimes committed by Muslims. And let’s not forget the similar achievements of Christian colonists/evangelists in many other parts of the world.
Nor should the two hundred years of slavery, on which the US economy was founded, be included – because – some abolitionists were devout Christians.
Likewise, I suppose, the centuries of Christian violence of religious wars during the Middle Ages, the pogroms, the Inquisition, the Napoleonic wars and other conflicts, where millions of Christians for decades killed millions of other Christians, and even those more recent and even more horrible wars, most of which involved no Muslims at all, can all be discounted.
So, as a history scholar knowing all of this, you can safely conclude that the “slaughter, rape and violence” committed by Muslims, and which so concern Ferdinand, can be condemned by Christians, with no fear of being accused of ignorance or hypocrisy.
I’m indebted to you, gi, for your historical insights. They’re certainly unconventional, and deeply fascinating.
gravenimage says
Yet more from “Rod”:
Well gi, as a history graduate you’d know that it’s historic fact that vast populations of the indigenous peoples of the Americas were decimated after the arrival of white Christians…
…………………………….
Of course they were. I have never denied this, and this is widely chronicled in the West. How can “Rod” pretend that it is not?
In fact, the West–unlike Islam–has been very apt to own up to her historical failings.
More:
Importantly, none of this was “mandated by Christianity”, even though committed by Christians, so somehow these occurrences (note, I’m not saying “crimes” or “atrocities”) shouldn’t be compared with the crimes committed by Muslims. And let’s not forget the similar achievements of Christian colonists/evangelists in many other parts of the world.
Nor should the two hundred years of slavery, on which the US economy was founded, be included – because – some abolitionists were devout Christians…
…………………………….
What absolute tosh. “Rod’s” pretending that the West has not admitted the evils of slavery is utterly false–this is obvious to anyone paying even the slightest attention.
Note that he has *nothing* critical to say about Muslims continuing to enslave people today. But given his posting history here, why would he?
More:
Likewise, I suppose, the centuries of Christian violence of religious wars during the Middle Ages, the pogroms, the Inquisition, the Napoleonic wars and other conflicts, where millions of Christians for decades killed millions of other Christians, and even those more recent and even more horrible wars, most of which involved no Muslims at all, can all be discounted.
…………………………….
Again, this is absurd. The idea that these aspects of history are not acknowledged by the West is simply ludicrous.
And note that “Rod” referring to Napoleon as “Christian” is questionable, in any case.
“Rod’s” claim that I or rest of the West are discounting history is *quite* false.
More:
So, as a history scholar knowing all of this, you can safely conclude that the “slaughter, rape and violence” committed by Muslims, and which so concern Ferdinand, can be condemned by Christians, with no fear of being accused of ignorance or hypocrisy.
I’m indebted to you, gi, for your historical insights. They’re certainly unconventional, and deeply fascinating.
…………………………….
We have seen *this* many times before, and it is the whole crux of “Rod’s” ugly purpose here–that since Christians and other ‘filthy Infidels’ have done bad things in the past–often the very distant past–that is it hypocritical of us to have any problem with Muslims mass raping and slaughtering Infidels, and conquering unbelievers and imposing brutal Shari’ah law.
Note that he puts “slaughter, rape and violence” in sneer quotes when applied to Muslims. He is either implying that Muslims have never done any such thing–1400 years of the same to the contrary–or that he does not consider these things bad when done by Muslims.
Note, in any case, that he has *nothing* critical to say about Muslim savagery–the greatest threat in the world today.
The whole purpose of this, of course, is to get the ‘filthy Infidels’ to roll over for Muslim savagery, out of an unearned sense of guilt. *Ugh*.
Rod says
Sorry gi. The real problem here is your English comprehension skills. Better stick wit Mr Spencer. He won’t stretch your mind too far. But I’d just like to point out – what you imagine I said (or “implied”) is weird.
gravenimage says
Rod wrote:
Sorry gi. The real problem here is your English comprehension skills. Better stick wit (sic) Mr Spencer…
…………………………
This is what “Rod” is reduced to, since he is incapable of addressing any of the points in my reply.
Ferdinand (@StFerdinandIII) says
The ‘crimes’ against the ‘Native Indians’ are lurid, documented, propagated, taught, emphasised, exaggerated.
The Indians were very good at killing, murdering, slaughtering, enslaving themselves, long before whitey came. The Aztecs beheaded some 80.000 per annum and kicked the bodies down temple steps. The Mayans wiped out their ecology and perished – both enslaved millions.
Many Christians defended the rights of Indians Las Casas for example argued they had property rights (16th c.), other missionaries are notable for their defence of Indian life and spirit.
Most of those wonderful multii-culti ecology loving Gaia worshipping Indians died due to disease – unlike the Native Indian pre-white populations which were ravaged by endless stone-age war and impoverishment. They returned the favour by granting whitey syphilis which killed and maimed millions of whitey’s – but you don’t care about that.
So in your little mind – Moslems killing and slaughtering does not matter, because an advanced Christian civilisation came into contact with a stone-age civilisation that was itself barbaric and crude?
Ridiculous. So let me guess, Mexico today is a great country because of its brown Indian skin, and Canada and the US are just white imperialist fascisms which should be torn down and given back to the Iroquois, Ojibway, Cree, and the Huron…oh wait the Hurons were wiped out by the Iroquois and only saved by the French and English so maybe they don’t deserve anything.
Rod says
So Ferdinand, I don’t care about syphilis. Moslem killing does not matter. I think Canada and the US are white imperialist fascisms. The Hurons (or is it the French?) don’t deserve anything.
Is this your own style of debate, Ferdinand, based not on what is actually said, but on silly and outrageous lies? What on earth do you expect to prove in this way? (Other than what it tells me about you.)
Your friend gi seems to think it effective too.
It’s not.
I’m disappointed that you seem to think the Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas got what they deserved, but I’m not surprised. Is this racism? I hope not. But you would be too timid to admit it.
gravenimage says
Note that “Rod” never says that he believes that Muslim killing matters.
in fact, in his entire history of posting here that I have seen he has never said anything critical of violent Jihad at all. Instead, he has desperately tried to distract from it, and he is doing the same here.
Ezra says
Moslem hatred for Christians is a corollary of antisemitism because to moslems and muhammadanism Christianity is a daughter religion of Judaism (correctly so I would point out). Therefore, when you see antisemitism from moslems it rightfully applies to Christians as well. One caveat, moslems may indeed hate Christians more because Christians see Christ Jesus differently than moslems. Christians see God as three persons as one in substance and character – the roles of the Trinity are defined differently, but the pagans of the moslem religion, polytheists all, contort Christian doctrine for their own wicked purposes and accuse Christians of polytheism when the truth is that Christianity, like its predecessor Judaism is monotheistic.
[BTW, reflect on moslems’ yearly pilgrimage to mecca to worship the idol at the ka’aba which is no more than a black rock (meteorite) that fell out of the sky. Interesting, no?]
somehistory says
The ranking Dem, the chairman of the committee on which this creepy moslim has been assigned a seat, has told her to “be silent, listen and learn.’ Of course, she won’t as her moslim arrogance won’t allow it.
It is by speaking with the mouth that a person can find out what is in the heart. When she blabs, speaks, talks…whether it is with foul words or ordinary ones…we can learn what is in her heart and learn of her intentions.
Of course, most of us know already, but there may be some who haven’t heard her yet that can still have their eyes opened to the kind of creature she is.
Jay says
Rashida Tlaib is a disgrace and against everything America stands for! Being sworn in on the Koran is
unconstitutional at best! She ran unopposed in Michigan and falsified her address to establish a Detroit
residency. There is current a petition to have her recalled or removed. I do hope it succeeds!
But voter fraud is rampant in Detroit so it’s not surprising ! I hope that Tlaib, Omar in Minnesota, and
Ocasio Cortez are all recalled. After 8 years of Obama damage and Muslim infiltration in our government, we certainly don’t need anymore! John Brennan and Eric holder are two examples that come to mind!
God bless and save America!?????
Trump 2020 ????????????????
Manuel 2 Paleologus says
I agree with you 100%. Most of the Americans have no clue what islam is. It is regrettable these anti-Americans muslimas and AOC, a crazy cisgender woman, are making laws in our land. Shame on all those who voted for these evils. These 3 congress women should be impeached as anti-Americans.
I urge those who read this to watch the u-Tube presentation on what political islam is.https://youtu.be/t_Qpy0mXg8Y
GreekEmpress says
Manuel 2,
Thank you for posting the link.
Ezra says
What is cisgender? Don’t you mean “mis-gendered”?
gravenimage says
Almost everyone is “cisgendered”. This just means “born as”. Anyone who is not transgendered is “cisgendered”.
FYI says
Is the ADL prepared to be silent about…..
… SAHIH MUSLIM #6985?
That is islamic supremacist ideology that calls for the annihilation of the Jews.
Perhaps the ADL should ask rashida tlaib or ilhan omar or abbas hamidah to explain that.
{hizbollah certainly subscribe to Sahih Muslim # 6985}
SAHIH MUSLIM #6985:islam’s version of the final solution.
“There is a Jew behind me…kill him”
Does the ADL think it is going to go away.. or is better left ignored?
Will the ADL say nobody told them about this or that they didn’t know?
Hitler said he was going after the Jews and when he got to power,that’s exactly what he did.
islamic supremacist ideology talks about going after the Jews and when they gain political power,that’s exactly what they WILL do:it is part of islamic supremacist ideology to destroy Israel and the Jews.
All it takes for evil to triumph will be for the virtue-signaling ,bleeding-heart Lefties of the ADL to do nothing.
If ADL ignores islamic supremacist ideology or islamic antisemitism then they cannot plead innocence.
Tekyo Pantzov says
“Ashkenazi Jews are not true Jews because they are not descended from ancient Hebrews”.
By the same reasoning, Turks are not true Muslims because they are not descended from ancient Arabians.
gravenimage says
Anti-Defamation League silent about anti-Semitism of Muslim Rep. Rashida Tlaib
………………………..
This is disgusting but hardly surprising; saying anything critical of Muslims–no matter how appalling–is deemed politically incorrect.
Ezra says
I love being labeled by the alt-left as politically correct since I conclude I am onto the truth in re the instant discussion.
gravenimage says
🙂
lisalles says
Obviously she is a liar. She is disgusting but more important then views on israel and jews, is the fact that she was elected to represent a portion of America. Better yet, the democrat left portion. This should be news to most Americans. Somehow, the government needs to get this news out there to ALL AMERICANS so they can see which party is the party who discriminates in real time. Rather than try to explain that the democrats voted against the civil rights act of 1964. They voted FOR slaves. They voted AGAINST segregation. They voted AGAINST giving blacks the right to vote. This is what the democrats represent. AND
Roland Tours says
The story of the Khazars is quite fascinating. See Kevin Alan Brooks, “The Jews of Khazaria”. Some of the Turkic Khazars converted to Judaism, but not enough of them to make a significant difference in the genetic inheritance of Ashkenazic Jews. As for the Palestinians, they have a mixed genetic inheritance from many different places.
ADL is a sad case of organization capture by radical leftist non-Jewish Jews. The current director is Jonathan Greenblatt, a man with no prior experience in Jewish organizational life. He was previously a commissar in the Obama administration, which was unfriendly to Jews. Some journalist should write the story of how this came about.
gravenimage says
True, Roland. Most of those who claim that all Jews today are “Khazars” are Neo-Nazis or Muslims.
Ernie says
+1
Indiana Tom says
The left-leaning Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the nation’s largest Jewish civil rights group, has declined to weigh in on Democratic Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s latest tie to anti-Semitism.
The ADL is not really operating in defense of Jews anymore; it is just another propaganda arm of the Left,
I am glad somebody besides me figured out the ADL is a Bolshevik ( questionable ) Jew Organization.
Nah, they are not going to criticize their best bud Muslims.
christianblood says
Idiana Tom posted
(.. I am glad somebody besides me figured out the ADL is a Bolshevik ( questionable ) Jew Organization.Nah, they are not going to criticize their best bud Muslims..)
You made some good points, Indiana! There is no doubt the Jewish liberal organizations in the US, like ADL love to collude with Islamists while they look Christian organizations and activists with suspicion and even accuse them with stuff like anti-semtism etc.
Indiana Tom says
“Ashkenazi Jews are not true Jews because they are not descended from ancient Hebrews”.
Still say Judaism is a religion and not a race. Sort of like a Lutheran or Methodist race and just as ridiculous.
christianblood says
Indiana Tom posted
(…Ashkenazi Jews are not true Jews because they are not descended from ancient Hebrews”. Still say Judaism is a religion and not a race. Sort of like a Lutheran or Methodist race and just as ridiculous…)
Good point, Indiana! Ashkenazi Jews look more like Europeans to me than middle eastern brown-skinned semites which is how the original Hebrews looked like! Many believe that Ashkenazi Jews are the descendants of Turkic people who converted to Judaism enmass many centuries ago! What say you, Indiana?
gravenimage says
christianblood wrote:
Good point, Indiana! Ashkenazi Jews look more like Europeans to me than middle eastern brown-skinned semites which is how the original Hebrews looked like! Many believe that Ashkenazi Jews are the descendants of Turkic people who converted to Judaism enmass many centuries ago! What say you, Indiana?
………………..
“Turkic people”–this is more ranting about the “Khazars”.
This was a small Turkic tribe whose leader converted to Judaism. Jews of this heritage make up only a tiny percentage of Jewish heritage.
The small population of central Asian Jews are Mizrahi Jews, not Ashekenazi Jews as in northern Europe.
It is mostly Neo-Nazis and Muslims who make the claim that all Jews today are “Khazars”. This is usually used as a claim that Israel should be destroyed.
This meme actually has a tragic origin–it was a Jewish man in Nazi Germany who first tried to widely spread this idea, desperately hoping that he could save European Jews from the Fascists.
Of course, this did not work–but now, unsurprisingly, it has been unearthed by another generation of homicidal antisemites.
christianblood has made it quite clear that he supports the destruction of Israel.
christianblood says
Graven
I am actually pro-Israel and love the Jews than you could imagine!
BTW, why do you think Ashkenazi Jews look more like Europeans than middle eastern semites, Graven? I am no anti semite here I am just curious what your theories are concerning this. Thank you!
gravenimage says
European Jews look more like Europeans because they *are* European. There was inevitably some intermarriage with European Gentiles over the centuries. Ashkenazi Jews do *not* look central Asian, as christianblood pretends.
And christianblood’s claim that he loves Israel and the Jews is just grimly laughable. he calls Jews “Christ killers” and praises Hezb’allah’s attacks on Israel, even screaming “God bless Hezb’allah!”.
Here, he characterizes Hezb’allah’s museum of Jihad as “resistance”:
“Hizballah operates “Museum for Jihadi Tourism” in South Lebanon”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/09/hizballah-operates-museum-for-jihadi-tourism-in-south-lebanon
Of course, the goal of such “resistance” is the destruction of Israel. This purpose is enshrined in Hezb’allah’s own charter.
Brigitte from Germany says
https://www.change.org/p/impeach-rashida-tlaib?recruiter=855854356&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition&utm_term=psf_combo_share_initial.pacific_email_copy_en_gb_4.v1.pacific_email_copy_en_us_3.control.pacific_post_sap_share_gmail_abi.gmail_abi.pacific_email_copy_en_us_5.v1.lightning_2primary_share_options_more.variant
Sign it and share it.
Thanks a lot.
gravenimage says
Thanks for posting this again.
somehistory says
There is a long article in the NYTimes today about this woman and omar and it quotes some things Democrats are saying to and about these moslims Rep Engle told her “privately” that what she is saying about Israel will not be “swept under the rug.”
Of course, the Times slant is that the women are “absorbing” the negative things others are saying about them and that Republicans are just using the situation to cause a split for their own agenda.
The things this moslim woman and her cohorts omar and o-cortez are saying, would be totally unacceptable if they were not who they are. Allowances are made due to “diversity” and the whole islam thing.
But evil is evil, whoever is taking part.
gravenimage says
Yes–I saw that disgusting article.
somehistory says
And from FrontPageMag
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/272670/world-council-churches-and-jew-hate-joseph-puder
Kay says
Adl silent on antisemitism. This is much like women’s rights groups silent on honor killings and genital mutilation and child marriage. Deeply troubling.
MJP says
The scary thing is as more & more Muslimas run for congress & the Senate it will only get worse there ultimate goal is to get a Majority which will take time but just with the few Idiots that are there you can see how fast the Constitution is getting watered down & they are working on Installing Sharia Law just vision a bunch of loud mouthed Muslim pigs saying the president is a MFER instead of just 1 ugly bigmouth like a few weeks ago
gravenimage says
Yes–this infiltration is *very* disturbing, and is, as you note, only apt to get worse.