Sara Khan’s premise is that Muslims only turn to jihad because Infidels are unkind to them. If we turn in kindness to Muslims, all will be well. So if this unrepentant jihadi bride is let back into Britain, and raises more jihadis, all will be well, but if she is barred from the country, more Muslims in Britain will turn to jihad. Ultimately, resistance to jihad angers Muslims and thus creates more jihadis, so what Sara Khan is really counseling here is that Britain should simply surrender and adopt Sharia, and then all will be well.
“Stripping jihadi bride Shamima Begum of her British citizenship could spark extremist backlash against UK, warns Home Office advisor,” by Martin Robinson, Mailonline,
February 22, 2019:
Radical Islamists could exploit the decision to strip Shamima Begum of her British citizenship, the Government’s chief adviser on countering extremism has warned.
Home Secretary Sajid Javid made the move after the teenager, who fled London aged 15 to join the so-called Islamic State caliphate in Syria, said she wanted to return to the UK with her newborn son.
Independent adviser Sara Khan has cautioned that the Government must acknowledge the anxiety caused by the decision, with extremists being eager to ‘exploit alienation and grievance’.
‘While it is for courts to test the legality of decisions such as deprivation of citizenship, we have to also ask how measures such as this impact wider work on countering extremism,’ she said.
‘The Government has to recognise the unease felt by a wide range of people about decisions of this kind, not least those from minority communities with dual nationality.
‘It has to build trust in its approach, because Islamist extremists will exploit alienation and grievance to turn people against their country.’
The family of jihadi bride Shamima Begum have written to the Home Secretary challenging his decision to revoke her British citizenship.
Sajid Javid blocked the 19-year-old’s return earlier this week, saying she poses a risk to the country’s security.
But in a letter to Mr Javid, her family have said they ‘cannot simply abandon her’ and that her status is ‘a matter for our British courts’….
Fredrrick says
The last person to threaten the UK ended up commiting suicide in a bunker. The Brits do not buckle under pressure, in fact that’s when you see our real character. STUBBORN
Ecosse1314 says
Yeh maybe. Our courts buckle fast enough under libtard pressure though.
J D.S says
The attitude of “if you don’t do this we will do that” is going yo take the UK to the. edge of a cliff with no other place yo go except down..PURE STUPIDITY! How can any western nation succumb to Islamism is just unbelievable……How did these western leaders let this happen? And why have the “people” became sheep being led to slaughter???
Trish McLemore says
Unfortunately THAT was before the British government SOLD OUT to One World Order ???
Agha Ali Arkhan says
Kind of a gangsta black mail, don’t you think? Javid is a mal thespian in my opinion but some Brits eat her up because she’s so darned attractive, eh wot!
Savvy Kafir says
I hope that’s still true, Fredrrick. I’m hoping enough patriotic Brits prove to be stubborn enough to make the difference, and push back the tide of Islam.
Rufolino says
Transparent taqiya. This is laughable.
Lydia Church says
This is so typical jihad.
Oh, hurry, you’d better go along with all of their requests, or else the ‘peaceful’ muslims will all jump on the jihad band wagon and wage terrorism all over the landscape! Quick!!!
And thus they win either way…
yes… we’ve seen this script somewhere before…
christianblood says
+1
eduardo odraude says
Where does Sara Kahn’s brilliant strategy end? Suppose a jihadist beheads someone. Would Sara Kahn say
“don’t imprison him. If you put him in jail, other Muslims will turn to jihad.”
Really? If Sara Kahn is right that Muslims will only obey the law if they are not punished when they break the law, well, in that case Muslims — starting with Sara Kahn — do not belong in non-Muslim populations at all. According to Sara, Muslims must have their cake and eat it too, especially if the cake belongs to non-Muslims.
Savvy Kafir says
Exactly. One more excellent reason why they cannot be allowed to remain in the West. Muslims have stolen enough territory already, in the Middle East, Africa, Asia, etc. They should not be allowed to colonize in the West too.
It’s time to start pushing back — until not one Allah junkie remains in the civilized world.
christianblood says
+1
alex says
Anjem Choudary and other clerics like him preached violent jihad for years in the UK, when they were free to roam around and collect jizyah largess from British taxpayers in the form of welfare payments and other goodies. So, when Choudary was finally jailed for supporting ISIS, does that mean that he (and similar Islamist clerics) are now so outraged by his conviction and imprisonment (he didn’t even serve the full 5 years of his sentence) that they will racket up their hate-preaching?! How could they increase it even more from what they were doing earlier, when the UK was acting especially nice to them?
gravenimage says
Important points, Eduardo.
mortimer says
Agree with EO. This is doubletalk from Sara Khan… namely, ‘if UK doesn’t allow JIHADISTS to enter the UK, then more Muslims in UK will become JIHADISTS!’
Wow! Actually, if you don’t allow jihadists into the UK, then they will not RADICALIZE MANY MORE.
Tom says
Mortimer as you and I both know it doesn’t take much for those who have the mindset of jihad to turn from non action to action and nothing that we say or do will affect or prevent that.
Perhaps if the west submits totally to Islam and become the subserviant third class citizens they crave us to be, perhaps then those of the jihad mind will only revert to killing other muslims of the opposing belief. Shia would kill Sunni and vice versa. Life would go back to normal with just the odd beheading or stoning of the kaffir for looking at a muslim the wrong way. Ahhhhh Slavery, the path to peace with Islam.
mortimer says
What I ‘know’, Tom, is that 15% of Muslims support terror groups and 85% do not support them. Most Muslims are uneasy about supporting violent jihad. 35% of Muslims have quietly apostasized. One out of three Muslims are not even practicing. About a tenth of 1% of Muslims are terrorists.
Wellington says
Whether non-Muslims, who in Islamic law are the equivalent of human waste, are kind or unkind to “the best of peoples” {Sura 3:110}, i.e., Muslims, jihad and lot of other Islamic rot is ‘acomin’ their way precisely to the extent Mo’s followers can make it come their way, be it by deception or actual war.
Thus, deny Muslims what they want because they want everything, kindness towards them by kuffaars essentially being irrelevant, actually quite stupid many times. Informed people should know that Mo’s followers look forward to the day when there is no more dar al-harb, only a ubiquitous dar al-Islam. Should that day ever come, this will signal that the darkest of nights has enveloped all of mankind in all of man’s history.
For the sake of liberty, equality under the law, overall graciousness, a true Golden Rule for all, women’s rights, the owning up to one’s own mistakes (which the Islamic is completely incapable of doing, for instance on the matter of slavery), fine beer, fine pork products, the striving by the human species for real happiness et al., never think that kindness to Muslims will further any of this. Quite the opposite in fact.
mortimer says
Agree with Wellington. Islam is at war with civil liberties and human rights.
Joe1 says
They’re good at extortion. It’s as if it’s part of their DNA.
JH says
If we allow this they will know that the government has surrendered and it will be hell for the rest of us unless we stand and defend our country and our children.
Sorry to be blunt but truth is truth
Anjuli Pandavar says
Robert Spencer’s “The History of Jihad from Muhammad to ISIS,” proves beyond doubt that the UK has been revoking jihadi brides’ citizenship for 1400 years. Sara Khan would never have made her claim if she didn’t have such overwhelming evidence.
Renate says
Sandra Solomon escaped from Saudi Arabia and she doesn’t believe that ISIS brides should be allowed back into the West.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eReY7URswTM&feature=em-uploademail
gravenimage says
+1
strats4ever says
Another Canadian (Saudi Arabia/Islam) escapee, warns:
To Unlearn What They’ve Brainwashed Us With Takes More Than Fake Remorse
https://youtu.be/FaHKG0LTXFo
somehistory says
A moslim commits a terror act. People are killed. The moslim perp, the terrorist, is punished…by prison, by deportation, by loss of citizenship.
So,other moslims threaten…”if you punish…the moslim terrorist…in any way whatsoever…other moslims will turn to terror as a means to show their displeasure with the punishment…no matte how awful, how harmful, the first action was.
The government backs off…to appease and “prevent” further terrorism.
Another day, another moslim commits a terror attack. The government says they will punish the terrorist. A moslim…like the “adviser” steps up with the threat…if you punish as you say you will….more moslims will turn to terrorism, so don’t do it. The government reacts in fear and doesn’t punish.
And the terrorism does not end…even when the terrorists are not punished. **Because** the terrorists are not punished…the terrorism continues.
Wise King Solomon gave some excellent reasoning on this in Ecclesiastes 8. If the governments dealing with moslim terrorists would only read it and learn something that has been available for thousands of years…perhaps they would have a handle on justice. And fewer terrorists committing acts of terror.
Roderick MacUalraig says
Exactly. Worthless cowards that need to learn some history.
gravenimage says
UK’s Muslim “advisor on countering extremism” says ISIS bride must be let back in or more Muslims will turn to jihad
……………………
In other words, Jihad is caused by any attempt at defending against Jihad. So submit now, filthy Infidels…
Westman says
Not letting her back in sure sounds like a good way to locate those who should be deported to a Muslim country when they start threatening mahem in response. It is so obvious, despite the cultured rhetoric, that the UK’s ruling class considers the public to be little more than cattle that need herding – just like Islam’s view of unbelievers. It has never gotten out of a ruling system into a truly representstive system. The best evidence is the continuation of royalty and titles of “Lords”. Thank you, great-grandfather for leaving to find real freedom.
sheliak says
The article does not mention whether Ms. Khan was wearing Groucho Marx glasses and holding a lit cigar while making her comments.
Save Europe says
I prefer that that they DO, so that they show their TRUE nature.
Michael Copeland says
“… because Islamist extremists will exploit alienation and grievance to turn people against their country”, said Sara Khan.
This is a sort of “press-the-button” robotic response of catch-phrases, now well-worn with overuse.
It is Islam that turns its adherents away from their country:
“I am a traitor to my country because my religion requires me to be” – Samir Khan of New York.
“The muslim nation is one nation to the exclusion of all others” – placard in Oxford St. Sharia march
Islam instructs alienation:
“Do not take Jews and Christians as allies” – Koran 5:51.
Jihad “means to war against non-muslims”, and is “a communal obligation” –
Manual of Islamic Law, “Reliance of the Traveller”, (o9.0, o9.1).
Antiislamicman says
Jihad is the way for every Muslim on the planet, this woman is talking total crap. She just thinks we are all as dumb as her.
robcallow says
This is what the UK has degenerated into, and it’s fast heading your way…
https://www.facebook.com/leaveeuofficial/videos/436207413587024/UzpfSTEwMDAwMTcyNzY2OTExNToyMTI2MzM4MjYwNzY3MDc1/?notif_id=1551080372367250¬if_t=feedback_reaction_generic
Mr. Maxwell S. J. Fenton says
But jihad has many forms practiced by Muhammadans, what she is saying is simply her contribution.
black adder says
That sounds like a blackmail.
somehistory says
black adder
Known in modern legal circles in the U.S. as “extortion.” It’s a practice prevalent in groups guilty of violating RICO statutes.
Extortion is a large part of racketeering.
moslims are committing extortion when they threaten attacks if…. Much like the gangs or mobs that take money from small businesses in exchange for “protection”…a.k.s. attacks not made by those extorting the money. When the money is not paid, the “protection” against their own members is non-existent. And the “price” for the “protection” constantly rises.
infidel says
As I have said on this forum earlier many times, the so called mods like Sarah Khan and her Jehaadi bros play the role of the good cop and the bad cop to perfection till the infidel society is worn down and gives up and capitulates completely to the parasite of Islam. This is the same thing happening in Kashmir India. Muslims do terror and when Indian army takes action, the so called mods like Mehbooba Mufti, say that strong army action will turn more young Muslims to Jehaad. It is a lose-lose situation for us infidels all the time…
owensgate says
Allow me to make a wild guess. Sara Khan is a moslem. I wonder, had she been in British government in 1939, would she have advocated for not being “unkind” to Hitler’s Wehrmacht?
Richard Courtemanche says
And, this is just one example when Islamists will counter any attempts to stop their caliphate. See how our cowardly and irresponsable western politicians put their countries in a dire state!
KWJ says
Anything can be used to recruit jihadis such as the Qur’an and ahadith which is what prominent clerics and those tied to Al Qaeda have done let alone clerics in England doing the same in Britain and Muslims creating their own alienation and non-assimilation. This so-called counter-terrorism woman is full of bs and she must think many westerners are that stupid (though some are). Her narrative actually encourages it and American counter-terrorism “experts” are not much better.
The expectation that the west should be more compassionate than the Iraqis and Syrians has repeatedly come back to stab the west in the back. Officials in Britain already said a year ago that there are around 25,000 potential jihadis in Britain and they have plenty on watch lists and some off those who “fell off the radar” or have a previous crime record and then were involved in attacks. Obviously this ISIS bride is but a water drip into an Olympic size pool. While whatever the laws are should be followed, this natrative is irrelevant. Anything can be used as an excuse such as England’s partipation in Middle East civil wars which is one of their biggest recruitment just as Bin Laden complained about infidels in their lands as well as countries like Saudi Arabia being allies with infidel governments. “The enemies of Allah” as ISIS bride said as Prophet Muhammad said.
An American official just said such issues like some marginal pastor in Florida talking about some burning the Qur’an event could endanger our soldiers in Afghanistan yet a few soldiers have been killed by ally Afghan Army soldiers who turned on them when someone convinced them they should not be allying enemies of Allah. Why else? They’ve already done this-no new issues needed. It’s always been one thing or another that makes Muslims mental about something…a riot over the Coca-Cola logo or a cartoon but these jihadis are an understandable problem since she has shown no remorse yet Muslims say they don’t support terrorism or jihad so they shouldn’t be kind either; if she was brainwashed, by, say, watching ISIS videos or recruiters online she joined ISIS for THAT reason.
So, in my mind these counter-terrorism folks keep encouraging Muslims to have mental fits. Even America has let jihadis back in here let alone Islamist jihad groups infecting mosques and Muslim “advocacy” or ridiculously “human rights” Muslim advocacy groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood which is always trying to make Muslims more religious as they have done with new refugees in Europe as displayed in documentaries straight out of the refugees’ mouths but even young Muslims born in Western countries.
Then there are Muslims in Europe who talk about “exclusion” when their religious demands aren’t coddled and thus promote alienation. Take a simple example: noisy calls to prayer waking up everybody nearby the mosque with multiple speakers and violating freedom FROM religion-the non-Muslims understandably resent that and therefore won’t much like their Muslim mosque adherents just as someone who plays loud music and some guy is being an mc on a loud microphone and heard pretty far away, yet many Muslims don’t even acknowledge that this is a very rude practice.
So much dishonesty and also leaving out the deals made with the Arabs such as Bat Ye’or has repeatedly shown regarding the Euro-Arab Dialogue and dhimmitude…that none of this is spontaneous, really.
Muslims will continue to exploit our laws and freedoms while Islamic countries fester with the opposite and send clerics to the West to undermine us. England is a major prize, but America is the biggest prize. We have treason…aiding and abetting an enemy. We spent all this effort in repelling communism which is but one ism among others to be repelled.
England is a mess; it’s downhill from hereon out. Politicians here, such as Republican Lindsey Graham go on about Saudis killing a Saudi and the Prince being a madman when there are bigger fish to fry. We say Pakistan is a terrorist-supporting Islamic sh*thole, which it is, as Trump pointed out yet they just gave the Crown Prince a huge welcome even releasing 1000 doves with all the pomp; KSA is giving them all this money. Pakistan has a nuclear weapon. This is so pathetic it’s almost unbelievable but it’s a rant-worthy nightmare in the making. Is America going to let itself be humiliated like England and be a dhimmi submission country? Better decide now once and for all.
dan christensen says
‘It has to build trust in its approach, because Islamist extremists will exploit alienation and grievance to turn people against their country.’
If this badly hidden threat becomes a reality, then the British country owns the means to turn the resident alienated and grieving muslims marching towards Mecca.
Muslims has to build trust in their approach, because the British people are tired of being raped and robbed by a bunch of uncivilized parasites.
Genba says
Let’s not ban jihadis, because otherwise there will be terrorist attacks.
Let’s not criticize the Quran, because otherwise there will be terrorist attacks.
Let’s not draw Muhammad, because otherwise there will be terrorist attacks.
Let’s not serve pork, because otherwise there will be terrorist attacks.
…
And when you realize, your country has gone full Sharia.
Gollie walley google says
surely this sara khan should be jailed for inciting hate/jihad or better still deported to where the begum jihadi is holed up
Gary Taylor. says
is sara khan inciting hatred/jihad with her comments? I believe we have hate crime lefty laws in the uk now, shouldn’t she be deported for hate speak?
Giacomo Latta says
Izzat so, Sara dear. Or we could banish islam from our countries thereby eradicating all but our home-grown internet-trained dhimmis.