Crown prosecutor Lincoln Crowley “said the acts planned by the men would have been ‘designed to demonstrate to the unbelievers the righteousness of their particular belief in Islam’, but added, ‘the religion of Islam is not on trial here.'”
Of course it isn’t. The dogma that Islam teaches peace and that any Muslim who commits violence in its name must be twisting and hijacking its teachings must always be maintained. Any examination of evidence to the contrary is ipso facto bigoted and “Islamophobic,” and provokes massacres of Muslims. So all such examinations must be silenced.
“Terror accused plotted to bomb plane and release lethal gas, trial told,” by Georgina Mitchell, Sydney Morning Herald, March 18, 2019 (thanks to the Geller Report):
Two brothers accused of planning an IS-inspired terrorist attack in Sydney plotted to put a bomb on a plane at Sydney Airport and separately planned to release lethal gas, a jury has been told.
Mahmoud Khayat, 34, and Khaled Mahmoud Khayat, 51, have pleaded not guilty to one charge each of conspiring to do an act in preparation/planning for a terrorist act, after they allegedly planned the acts from January 20, 2017 until their arrest on July 29, 2017.
On Monday, at the opening of a trial in the NSW Supreme Court, Crown prosecutor Lincoln Crowley, QC, said the conspiracy was “formed and developed” when the men used apps including Telegram to contact an older brother fighting alongside Islamic State in Syria, and another person called “The Controller” who has not been identified….
A jury of nine women and three men was told Khaled Khayat prepared ingredients for the gas at his home before taking it to Mahmoud Khayat’s home in Punchbowl, where a “test” was done in a carport. The pair were under police surveillance and were arrested that day….
He said the acts planned by the men would have been “designed to demonstrate to the unbelievers the righteousness of their particular belief in Islam”, but added, “the religion of Islam is not on trial here”.
Mr Crowley said the explosive – referred to in one message as “the gift” – was going to be placed on an Etihad flight hidden inside a meat mincer on July 15. He said the explosive was brought as far as the lobby of the airport before the plan was aborted….
Mr Crowley said after the bomb was taken from the airport it was brought to a home in Surry Hills and dismantled. He said the components were placed in plastic bags which were stored in the garage of Khaled Khayat at Lakemba….
Mr Crowley said Khaled Khayat made “a range of extensive admissions” to police upon his arrest and said he was acting alone, while Mahmoud Khayat denied involvement in the plot.
He said police found a sermon on the phones of both brothers which said, in part, “god defeat all of the infidels, disbelievers” and “oh god bring down the airplanes”….
Buraq says
Crackpot religions needs crackpot followers. Islam fits the bill, perfectly! Clowns, all of ’em. From their deranged prophet to today’s moral invertebrates who spend every waking minute planning to kill innocent men, women and children!
K WAGNER says
Justice needs to be served….and not forgiveness due to “islamophobia”!!!!!
CRUSADER says
From where does Justice emanate?
Roger Woodhouse says
Islam is like socialism.To misquote Maggie Thatcher ‘Its fine till they run out of people to kill’
smoris says
And don’t forget their invertebrate enablers – our politicians, our “educational” institutions, our entertainment industry and our media.
Naram-Sin says
If Islam isn’t on trial, why do they keep filling the dock with Muslims?
gravenimage says
+1
Westman says
When you have to say something obvious “is not”, it is. That lie was a dog whistle that, on the surface, was intended to tell the Muslim community that jihad terrorism is not a reflection on Islam. However, at this point, everyone, from the prosecutor to the citizens, knows better. Yet each mouths the public personna of the groupthink to which they belong. When the Emperor has no clothes, they start a nudist colony.
Roger Woodhouse says
Its just a coincidence that muslims happen to be followers of Islam!!
Rufolino says
Terror attacks, plots, rape gangs, and in reporting tthem the BBC doesn’t even MENTION their motivating ideology: Islam !
Roger Woodhouse says
The BBC only reports ‘news’ that it is able to ‘spin’ or can be manipulated into a leftwing bias.News buletins are just an excuse to propandise.
Ashley says
Crown prosecutor Lincoln Crowley “said the acts planned by the men would have been ‘designed to demonstrate to the unbelievers the righteousness of their particular belief in Islam’, but added, ‘the religion of Islam is not on trial here.’”
________________________
Can we say “oxy-fucking-moron”?
warren raymond says
Well, to say otherwise would make the prosecutor an enemy of Islam, and you know what that means.
FYI says
islamic fanatics have to work hard to get their 72 Raisins.
Sorry,I meant virgins:it depends on the translation…..
That reminds me..I need to buy some Sultanas…
eduardo odraude says
I know you are joking, but for those who don’t, David Wood in an excellent video conclusively demonstrated the impossibility of the “raisin” translation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=12&v=TNL8xugDNZQ
CRUSADER says
Irshad Manji thought it was about 72 raisins….
Talk about a writer’s license…
She is a lesbian refusenik Muslima author personality who counts Salman Rushdie as a pal….
CRUSADER says
AnsweringMuslims.com
David Wood on
ABC’s Islam Deception–Part Three: Are Men and Women Equal in Islam?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWHDgJ9svxM
J D.S says
David wood puts the truth in the mouth of islam…but of course Islam spits it out and replaces it with a spoonfull of sugar ..And the MSM is sugarcoating Islam st every turn and providing a disservice to its followers….FAKE NEWS APLENTY! I don’t know the mindset if the followers of the MSM….Oh once in a while I watch some of the MSM news outfits but only to gather evidence against them.
I am old enough to remember when news organisations give out information yo protect its followers….Today they are trying, with what appears to be much success, to change and manipulate us.
Hold on to to what we know is the FIGHT because the LEFT will send you down a rocky road.
Walter Sieruk says
One of the definitions of Terrorism is the terrorism is “The use of violence for the achievement of political ends which is common to state and non- state groups.”
Therefore, Islam with its Islamic terrorism actually fits within this definition. As difficult and hard as this might be for some Westerners, especially Americans, to comprehend and understand. For example, many Americans do strongly understand the concept of the “separation of religion and state.”
For Islam is a religious/ political /Sharia law based system that had total and complete control over the thoughts values , lives , behavior of millions of people around the world. This also included the use of violence to achieve the advancement of the power of Islam. As Islam’s “holy book” the Quran does strangely instructs, as in Surah 2:191, 5:33. 9:5, 111, 47:4.
So the above definition of “non- state group” describes al Qaeda, Boko Haram , Al Shabaab, etc.
For the definition of “state” terrorism the rough state of Iran serve as good example , is i his Islamic terrors it inflects on the Iranian people though is violent ruffians gangs of Islamic state “police” who are called the “Revolutionary Guards.” Furthermore , the state “mullah regime “ of Iran also funds ,supports and uses in violent and murderous Muslim stooge jihad groups and Hezbollah and Hamas to achieve its religious /political agenda . So indeed Islam is political and with its violence fits the above definition.
Islam is in essence, a religious /political Sharia law based system. As so well explained in brief way, by the Muslim tyrant who and ruled Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini when he stated that “All Islam is politics.” [1]
[1] THE ISLAM IN ISLAMIC TERRORISM by Ibn Warraq , page 332.
CRUSADER says
Interesting the definition of Etihad is “Togetherness”
….
and of course the meaning of Ijtihad is “Reasoning / Rationalizing”
….
whereas the meaning of Jihad is something quite different….
Terry Gain says
No religion commands killing.
gravenimage says
Actually, a lot of religions have commanded killing–the religion of Baal and the religion of the Aztecs, certainly–and Islam most of all.
Those who want to conceal what Islam teaches so often say that “no religion commands killing”–just so the Infidels will think that all of these thousands of Jihadists are not acting in the name of Islam.
FYI says
It seems it never occurred to the Aztecs to WAIT to see if the sun would rise another day without the need for any human sacrifice to appease the gods:all that blood letting was insane.
But then they worshipped snakes and demons.
As for baal,he is defined as being the opposite to the Biblical God:in fact 2 choices are given.
Either “The Biblical God” OR “That which is NOT the Biblical God”
“If the Lord is God,worship Him.
But if baal be god,worship him”
I KINGS 18 v 21
PATH A is the Lord God{Jews and Christians with the SAME 10+2 laws}
PATH B is baal {or allah;=hu baal}{muslims of course..but they think they are on PATH A}
Jews and Christians are in the same Biblical Fold{Abrahamic religions}
muslims think islam is and that allah is the same as the Biblical God but he isn’t:
allah’s name is “the BEST of deceivers” k3:54:in the OT that would be baal,in the NT that would be satan
Raja says
Good reply by Gravenimage, FYI, Wellington etc. Made some very interesting reading.
Yeah, There are lots of simpletons who say and beleive that no religion is bad. Religions can be bad indeed just as they can be Godless.
I don’t know what was the religion of the king who offiered human sacrifice even during Christ’s time. Christ just made a passing remark but I ‘m sure He was sick of the sight where children were sacrifies to some gods. Pilate too offered human sacrifices during Christ’s time.
Islam is no different either as it pits man aganist man globally. There are zealot in Islam who want ot destroy infidel and the free West by any means.
Wellington says
Agreed, gravenimage. In fact, to aver that no religion commands killing, definitely an assumption masquerading as an axiom, only hinders Islam being exposed for what it truly is, i.e., an evil religion, because as difficult as it is to convince others that Islam is wicked, you will make matters even more difficult by averring that Islam is not a religion at all.
How bitterly ironic that those who contend Islam is not a religion unwittingly actually aid Islam in still passing itself off as something good and benign. Bet this never dawns on such people, well-intentioned though they may be.
No Fear says
Another example of human sacrifice in religion is in the worship of the goddess Kali. The fearsome goddess who eventually consumes all, is, in fact, a personification of time itself which eventually consumes all. Kali worship certainly consumed a lot of people. At one point in Calcutta one male per day was being offered up.
gravenimage says
True, No Fear–human sacrifice has certainly been a grim part of the worship of Kali.
abad says
Ever see the movie “Night of the Ghoul” starring John Hurt and Peter Cushing?
I have to wonder, when it was released in 1975, if Hindus ever protested the movie due to how Kali worshippers were portrayed: engaging in human sacrifice. Gwen Watford’s performance of Ayah was top-notch.
CRUSADER says
“The Deceivers” movie about the Thugee movement ….
Pierce Brosnan starred in that one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPKLkTAvdKA
gravenimage says
The bloody cult of Kali is, thankfully, a rare thing today. But they did exist.
mortimer says
TERRY, you are dead wrong about this: ISLAM COMMANDS KILLING of three groups … 1) apostates 2) blasphemers 3) those who are idol-worshippers. These decrees of Allah and Mohammed are applied with a certain flexibility and sometimes very rigidly and literally. Vigilante killing of apostates and blasphemers is authorized by Sharia law .
– 14 passages in the Koran refer to apostasy
– “They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.” – K. 4: 88-89
The killer of an apostate is not punished :
– Reliance of the Traveller (manual of Sharia law), ref. O8.4 : “There is no indemnity for killing an apostate (O: or any expiation, since it is killing someone who deserves to die).”
– Reliance of the Traveller: O1.2 – “The following are not subject to retaliation: -3- a Jewish or Christian subject of the Islamic state for killing an apostate from Islam (O: because a subject of the state is under its protection, while killing an apostate from Islam is without consequences)”
– According to Baidhawi’s commentary, Sura 4: 88-89 means: “Whosoever turns back from his belief, openly or secretly, take him and kill him wheresoever ye find him, like any other infidel. Separate yourself from him altogether. Do not accept intercession in his regard.”
– A hadith about Mohammed’s followers used as a basis of Sharia, tells of some atheists who were brought to “’Ali and he burnt them. The news of this reached Ibn Abbas who said: ‘If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah’s Apostate forbade it . . . I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah’s Apostate, ‘Whoever changed his [Islamic] religion, then kill him’.”
– A hadith in which Mohammed commands the killing of apostates, and promises eternal rewards for doing so: “When I relate to you the words of Mohammed, by Allah, I would rather die than bear false witness to his teachings. However, if I should say something unrelated to the prophet, then it might very well be a lie so that I might deceive my enemy. Without question, I heard Mohammed say, “In the final days before Redemption there will emerge groups of foolish youths who will say all the right things but their faith will go no further than their mouths and will flee from their religion like an arrow. So, kill the apostates wherever you find them, because whoever does so will be rewarded on Judgment Day.” -Sahih Bukhari 9,84,64
– Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the most renowned Muslim cleric of Egypt stated:
“The Muslim jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them. The majority of them, including the four main schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools of jurisprudence (the four Shiite schools of Az-Zaidiyyah, Al-Ithna-‘ashriyyah, Al-Ja’fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah) agree that apostates must be executed.”
CRUSADER says
Why would Terry get that bit wrong?
He’s been on JW long enough to know ….
gravenimage says
Mortimer, I’m sure Terry knows this about Islam. Terry has no illusions about how ugly Islam is.
Terry just constantly claims that it is impossible for any religion to be a bad thing–ergo, Islam must not be a religion. I don’t agree with this, myself.
eduardo odraude says
Terry, if I am not mistaken, believes that Islam is a totalitarian or authoritarian political system (true) and only masquerades as a religion (highly debatable). The notion that it is “not really” a religion would be an interesting philosophical or theological discussion, but in a political context the question is a waste of time. Why? Because one of the main points of the First Amendment is that the government is not going to define what constitutes “religion.” I don’t think Islam-critics will ever persuade the government to step in and declare that Islam is not a religion. The First Amendment is the bedrock of the US system, which is not going to step in and adjudicate such questions. We are wasting our energies if we think we can make that happen. The attempt to get US society to pronounce on “what is religion and what is not religion” would surely run up against insuperable and overwhelming opposition.
Outside of a political context, the discussion of what is “authentic” religion might be interesting philosophically. But politically it seems like pointless non-starter.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Eduardo.
CRUSADER says
“Islam is a river of blood”
— according to former Imam Mark Gabriel….
https://christinprophecy.org/sermons/mark-gabriel-on-the-nature-of-islam/
CRUSADER says
Bill Warner argues on the point of Political Islam ….as a way to defeat it.
Seb Gorka also argues about Islam being defeated as an ideology.
gravenimage says
Australia: Muslims plotted jihad massacres to “defeat all the infidels,” prosecutor says “Islam not on trial here”
……………………..
As long as Western courts refuse to learn anything about Islam, the more Muslims will be free to plot violent Jihad.
warren raymond says
We don’t know how much the prosecutor knows to make such an (admittedly) ignorant statement. Another motive could simply be cowardice, because telling the truth and stating the cold facts comes with shrieks of “racist-bigot-Islamophobia” and reprisals, plus vile attacks from the lame stream media.
somehistory says
Prosecutors must learn to update the way they label. moslim terrorists do not believe they are terrorists. They know they plot, they know they prepare bombs, they know they knife and shoot…but to moslims, none of their actions are terrorism. To mosims, the actions taken to stop them, to stop their advance, to stop the slaughter by moslims is terrorism.
i recall an episode of Law and Order where Sam Waterston was presented with a case that bore on religion and all throughout, it was argued back and forth whether God was on trial…or the belief in God was.
There has to be a way that islam can be shown as the motivating factor, the element behind the mens rea that causes the moslim to commit terrorism. Trying to put islam on trial where the actions of terrorists must be seen as having been committed by a certain person or persons is not going to make sense to the average juror. The jury has to decide if person A and person B made the bomb and put said bomb on the plane, and if person A and person B put lethal gas in an enclosed space.
Some jurors who are knowledgeable about islam may figure it out and know that islam put the idea into their heads. Unless the entire jury is of the same mind, some may object to that reasoning and go so far as to find them not guilty.
Wellington says
If Islam is never put on trial, this only insures all the more that all those who act in the name of Islam’s many heinous and lethal directives will be characterized as not understanding the noble, peaceful and tolerant religion which is Mo’s creed, blah, blah, blah.
As much as many of the most “devout” Muslims should be put on trial, it is far more important that Islam itself be put on trial. Until this occurs, the games will continue and Islam can only profit from this. Just as freedom is not absolute (e.g. falsely yelling “fire” in a crowded theater is not something protected by freedom of speech), so is it the case that assuming religions must absolutely be good is, as well, an extreme and fallacious assumption.
I would add here what I have stated before at JW and that is, when looked from a probability standard, it was likely, not a given but likely, that mankind would get a major religion which is rotten to the core. Mankind did. Mankind got Islam.
mortimer says
If some elderly lawyers (who are not worried about death and live in a secure, guarded building) want to join a moot court that puts Islam on trial, it would be a world-changing event!
At last, the world would see beyond a reasonable doubt that Islam is a religion of warfare against the disbelievers. The court should take Mohammed out of his grave and try him for crimes against humanity and for waging aggressive war against peaceful countries.
CRUSADER says
Awesome idea to put Islam on trial.
Who would sit as prosecutors and defenders?
Would there be a Judge? a Jury?
Court reporters and sketch artists?
Let’s flesh this out….
somehistory says
mortimer
Excellent idea. The “evidence” of islam’s evil, and the raper of children, mass-murderer’s guilt…in writing instructions for others to murder, rape, steal, and also his own participation, is overwhelming. The ‘book’ could be number one exhibit and there could be ex-moslims proficient in arabic brought in as “expert’ witnesses. Testimony could be held from remote locations so there would be decreased danger to anyone testifying.
In this way, islam, the teachings and commands and doctrines, would be on trial, and not a couple of guys whose attorney could argue that they are mentally ill, not guilty, etc. The prosecutor would have no living individuals to try to join to their belief while proving they personally committed a crime.
I was thinking last night about the Scopes Trial and what the judge did in that case. No sitting judge would ever be likely to rule in favor of putting islam on trial, but someone who once held such a position and has a record of honesty, integrity, and a knowledge of islam but having shown no previous “bias” against it.
islam is a giant conspiracy to bring down humanity by force. Someday, Divine Judgment will be rendered, but until then, the evil should be exposed as much as possible so people can make life altering decisions.
abad says
I agree that Moslems should be put on trial; as for Islam itself being put on trial, that is for the Lord Jesus Christ to do.
And right now, it does not look good for followers of Islam at all.
Wellington says
Why, abad, should Islam being put on trial be left up to Jesus? What, no religion, not even Scientology, can be put on trial by man?
Reasons? Your turn.
gravenimage says
I think we have every right to expose the horrors of Islam. Really, this is what Jihad Watch is for.
CRUSADER says
GREAT book topic for Robert Spencer:
“ISLAM on trial!”
mortimer says
In a certain sense, Crown prosecutor Lincoln Crowley, QC, is correct that the matter of the trial is that the men broke the laws of Australia and not whether Islam caused their behavior. However, journalists and writers are not defending our Western way of life if they do not realize that, in fact, ISLAM ACTUALLY CAUSED THEIR BEHAVIOR and thus ISLAM IS A VIOLENCE-PROMOTING RELIGION according to its own PRIMARY SOURCE TEXTS.
The jihadists have only one defense for their conduct, namely, the same one as the Nazis used: ‘I was just following orders’ … in this case the DECREES of ALLAH in the 164 jihad verses in the Koran.
K 002:178-179, 190-191, 193-194, 216-218, 244; 003:121-126, 140-143, 146, 152-158, 165-167,169, 172-173, 195; 004:071-072, 074-077, 084, 089-091, 094-095,100-104; 005:033, 035, 082; 008:001, 005, 007, 009-010, 012, 015-017, 039-048,057-060, 065-075; 009:005, 012-014, 016, 019-020, 024-026, 029,036, 038-039, 041, 044, 052, 073, 081, 083,086, 088, 092, 111, 120, 122-123; 016:110; 022:039, 058, 078; 024:053, 055; 025:052; 029:006, 069; 033:015, 018, 020, 023, 025-027, 050; 042:039; 047:004, 020, 035; 048:015-024; 049:015; 059:002, 005-008, 014; 060:009; 061:004, 011, 013; 063:004; 064:014; 066:009; 073:020; 076:008.
Michael Copeland says
“Islam was never a religion of peace. Islam is the religion of fighting.”
Al Baghdadi
Arnie says
Deport or jail. Take your pick.
CRUSADER says
Former Muslim Imam of Al-Azar University, who Converted Christian, and authored such books as “Islam and Terrorism” demonstrating the interconnection of Jihad with Islam….
Islam’s goal is world domination, no doubt about it.
Interview below:
++++++
Testimony of Dr. Mark Gabriel – Former Muslim Imam’s Journey to Christ
You will learn a lot on this video relating to the differences between Islam and Christianity.
(“why muslims hate Jews and Christians”…)
Many who are atheist, agnostics, christians, jews, buddhists, hindu, etc, are unaware to the nature and law of Islam (Shariah), the Qu’ran and the Hadith (Muhammad’s Biography and its teachings, miracles).
Is ISLAM a religion of peace as what the media teach us?
But if we go deeper into it’s teachings its a different story.
You will also learn about the goal of Islam toward the world.
What is the definition of PEACE in Islam and according to the Qu’ran?
Differences between the teachings of Christ and Muhammad…
Islam will NOT give peace. Islam will NOT allow for Grace and Forgiveness.
Islam is a mess. Get out of it!!!
If you think that this former Islamic cleric is lying on his statements…. view this video:
++++++ Experience The Freedom!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWfKakhz_Ew
eduardo odraude says
Dr. Gabriel went through hell to escape Islam. An extremely brave, decent, soulful man.
CRUSADER says
AMEN
+++++
Toxic says
Crown prosecutor Lincoln Crowley “said the acts planned by the men would have been ‘designed to demonstrate to the unbelievers the righteousness of their particular belief in Islam’, but added, ‘the religion of Islam is not on trial here.’”
B**L S**T. Islam MUST be put on trial.
tim gallagher says
I was thinking about why our government officials, including members of the judiciary, also media types and politicians won’t tell the truth about the evil nature of Islam. As I listen to so many of these people walking around on eggshells trying not to tell the unvarnished truth about Islam and offend MUslims, I can only conclude that our societies first make the mistake of letting Muslims in a fairly large numbers (although it is supposed to be only around 2% of Australia’s population) and then, because so many people in western societies are too nice, too civilised, or others just want, above all, to have a peaceful life,( some just too gutless also) they self-censor and won’t say anything that’ll offend the Muslims in their societies. The main example is that some Muslims might commit terrorist acts but Islam is , nevertheless, basically peaceful. This case is an example. They refuse to look at Islam overall and put it on trial. They won’t connect the dots. Such an approach, refusing to face the truth, will probably not end well in the long run.
CRUSADER says
Noel Gallagher Slams “Hippy” Attitude to Islam That Allows Terrorists …
https://www.infowars.com/noel-gallagher-slams-hippy-attitude-to-islam-that-allows-ter…
Former Oasis icon Noel Gallagher has slammed the “hippy” attitude towards Islam in the UK that allows thousands of known jihadists to roam …
Gallagher’s comments are particularly noteworthy because his song, Don’t Look Back in Anger, was widely invoked during tributes to the victims of the Manchester attack.
Yet, how ironic that music icon, his close friend Morrissey was so blatantly harsh about Trump.
Oy vey….
https://www.infowars.com/noel-gallagher-slams-hippy-attitude-to-islam-that-allows-terrorists-to-roam-free/
tim gallagher says
CRUSADER, I’m always glad to hear about anyone, especially people from the entertainment type industry which is so full of soft headed leftie idiots who usually spend their time defending Islam, waking up and criticising Islam, so I’m glad to hear that my long lost cousin, Noel, has woken up. No, I’m joking, he’s no relation as far as I know. There are so many Gallaghers around. I’m from the really obscure, completely unfamous branch of Gallaghers. I don’t think I have ever heard an Oasis song. I’m almost 70 years old and that group was never on my playlist. I do enjoy watching music performances on youtube but Oasis aren’t what I’d ever listen to. It is interesting what he says about the hippie attitude to Islam. Probably because it was on TV recently, it made me think of that movie “Mars Attacks” where the actress Annette Benning plays a hippie who goes, with other hippie types, to meet the invading Martians, believing they’ll be all love and peace. Instead the Martians (much like MUslims in my opinion) open fire on them and wipe them out.
kuriakose says
Australian politics: Waleed Aly is accused of ‘defaming’ Scott Morrison on The Project after claiming the Prime Minister once encouraged ‘anti-Muslim’ feelings as a political strategy. See https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6820833/Scott-Morrisons-office-blasts-Waleed-Aly-defamatory-Christchurch-editorial.html
The muslim victimhood mentality will never end. This psychosis is a sign of malignant narcissm, a disorder that some observers aver that the prophet of islam suffered from. Slimy Ali sure put on a wonderful performance of muslim victimhood.
In the meantime Pauline Hanson has been accused of being responsible in some way for the NZ shooting just because she made some pertinent comments about muslim immigration eg quote: ….”I feel for these people,” she said. “I feel for the families that have lost lives … We have problems but you’ve actually got to discuss it and debate the issues. Why do we have terrorist attacks in this country? Why is it happening around the world?”….
See https://www.newsline.com.au/2019/03/18/pauline-hanson-denies-one-nation-complicit-in-christchurch-massacre/
Looks like you cannot even have a debate on the issues behind the shooting without the islamohopia card being waved around.
tim gallagher says
I agree with your comment, kuriakose. I loathe the slimy Waleed Aly. I never watch him but occasionally he pops up on an advert or something. I hear reports about the lying garbage he speaks. As you say, the usual Muslim victimhood garbage is on full display. Endless terrorist attacks all over the world versus this one attack on Muslims in New Zealand. And the carry on is unbelievable and so dishonest. (ie all the Muslim terrorist attacks are not mentioned). I remember Waleed Aly saying, I think it was after the Muslim terrorist attack at the Boston marathon, that terrorist attacks were a mere irritant we should all just get used to. The vile Muslim apologist, Aly, says that MUslim terrorist attacks are an irritant, a minor thing, now, when some Muslims get killed, he carries on like a hysterical, over the top, Muslim propagandist. I hope Morrison sues Aly for millions. He won’t bother to do so, but I’d love to see Aly bankrupted. It would be well deserved.
kuriakose says
Creeps like him are as dangerous as ISIS types. At least ISIS etc are honest about islam. The idiots around us will be feting and parading him to show the face of ‘moderate’ islam (an oxymoron really), educated, suave etc. So easy to challenge Aly’s narrative, but no one seems to want to do it except some. And these few are shouted down. Even our PM does not want to do that.
tim gallagher says
Completely agree, kuriakose. And as you say, the ISIS barbarians are honest and upfront about Islam’s nature. But Waleed Aly is a barbarian who believes in all the evil garbage in Islam but is dressed in a suave manner in a suit and tie to fool people and give the impression that he is a civilised person..
brettmcs says
To be fair, Islam is not on trial in this case, nor in any other. Trials don’t work that way. Commissions or Parliamentary investigations and such may.