You won’t hear this from the establishment media. It doesn’t fit the narrative.
“Christians living in a Muslim country ‘143 times more likely’ to be killed by a Muslim than vice versa,” Voice of Europe, March 18, 2019:
Terrorist attacks against Muslims in the Western world, like the one that took place in Christchurch, are extremely rare….
If we put Friday’s killings in perspective, that perspective should include the fact that some 30 million Muslims reside in the Western world today, which makes the probability of any one of them falling victim to a deplorable attack in any given year roughly one in ten million.
261 persons have been killed and many more injured, in attacks by Muslims on non-Muslims, in less than four years, in only one country, France (pop. 66 million).
With 66 dead a year on average, Frenchmen are exactly ten times more likely to be murdered by a Muslim than a Muslim being killed by a non-Muslim terrorist anywhere in the Western world.
The score is incomparably worse if we look at the situation of Christians in the Muslim world. It is the most egregious example of human right violations in today’s world: according to “Open Doors”, at least 4,305 Christians known by name were murdered by Muslims because of their faith in 2018.
Aid to the Church in Need, in its latest “Religious Freedom Report”, warned that 300 million Christians, overwhelmingly in the majority-Muslim countries, were subjected to violence, making it “the most persecuted religion in the world.”
This makes the odds of a Christian in a majority-Muslim country being murdered by a Muslim – simply for being what he is – approximately one in 70,000.
Which means that a Christian living in a majority Muslim country is 143 times more likely to be killed by a Muslim for being a Christian than a Muslim is likely to be killed by a non-Muslim in a Western country for being what he is.
Battle says
Robert Spencer, Excellent report.
Lydia Church says
Agreed!
I heard this sort of thing many times before too and yes those of us without our heads in the sand know it.
Rufolino says
After the NZ attack one instantly realised that (as an attack on a Moslems) it would be feasted on by the media. And it was.
I also was aware that attacks on Moslems are utterly DWARFED in number by Moslem attacks on Christians. But try suggesting THAT to people such as the BBC.
gravenimage says
+1
abad says
I agree!
I wonder how long France will have a blind eye turned to the problem of Islam in its borders.
I find it very tragic, as I am 1/4 French heritage myself.
Frederick King says
Great report. I’ve read most of your books now. Somalia is the third most dangerous place on earth for Christians. Pakistan is number five.
somehistory says
And even though this truth is obvious, the world does not give notice or express outrage.
Jesus Christ said that because He was hated, the “world” would hate His followers, His disciples and this “hatred” would lead to persecution “on account of His name.”
Matthew even recorded that Jesus said that many who killed Christians would be those who think they are doing a service to God.
This is something Christians must endure. It is only going to get worse, until He brings it to an end, which He has promised to do.
(Matthew, chapters 24-25)
christianblood says
Exactly right!
Over 100.000 Christians are killed each year for their faith and over 97 percent of them in the Islamic world!
https://catholicherald.co.uk/news/2013/06/03/vatican-official-says-100000-christians-are-killed-each-year-because-of-their-faith/
abad says
Amen!
gravenimage says
Christians in Muslim countries ‘143 times more likely’ to be killed by Muslims than Muslims in non-Muslim countries
………………………
I think this pretty much says it all.
christianblood says
gravenimage
And the West, especially the US is on the side of the muslim jihadist killers and have been faithfully so for decades!
In the Balkans alone, the satanic, pro-jihadist US and Nato sided with Islamic jihadists, bombed Christian Serbs and established two islamic states (Bosnia & Kosovo) in Eastern Europe! See the video below of the hundreds of Christian churches and monasteries destroyed and desecrated by KLA jihadists fully supported, armed and funded by the US and Nato! Shame on the U$A! Shame on Nato!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHSav7TbYBM
Wellington says
Shame on Putin allowing Sharia law in Chechnya. Shame on Putin for celebrating the opening of the largest mosque in Moscow. Shame on Putin for making a distinction between Islam and radical Islam. Et al.
See, christianblood, it works both ways. Difference is we in the West can admit our mistakes while Russophiles like you can never admit error by Russia. This distinction speaks VOLUMES to those who pursue the truth with as much objectivity as is possible. It is also a major reason why Russia remains paranoid, xenophobic and backwards. You won’t get any of this but I assure you many do, most particularly peoples like the Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians, Poles, Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks—yep, it’s a long list here.
CRUSADER says
MOSQUE – cow
christianblood says
Wellington
As we speak, U$ is footing 1 Billion taxpayer dollars to give new missiles to its Saudi=ISIS allies!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dxtpzYL-Xs
christianblood says
Wellington
CIA’s Chechen Wars
Not long after the CIA and Saudi Intelligence-financed Mujahideen had devastated Afghanistan at the end of the 1980’s, forcing the exit of the Soviet Army in 1989, and the dissolution of the Soviet Union itself some months later, the CIA began to look at possible places in the collapsing Soviet Union where their trained “Afghan Arabs” could be redeployed to further destabilize Russian influence over the post-Soviet Eurasian space.
They were called Afghan Arabs because they had been recruited from ultraconservative Wahhabite Sunni Muslims from Saudi Arabia, the Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and elsewhere in the Arab world where the ultra-strict Wahhabite Islam was practiced. They were brought to Afghanistan in the early 1980’s by a Saudi CIA recruit who had been sent to Afghanistan named Osama bin Laden.
With the former Soviet Union in total chaos and disarray, George H.W. Bush’s Administration decided to “kick ‘em when they’re down,” a sad error. Washington redeployed their Afghan veteran terrorists to bring chaos and destabilize all of Central Asia, even into the Russian Federation itself, then in a deep and traumatic crisis during the economic collapse of the Yeltsin era.
As we speak now, US is transferring its Al-Qaeda and ISIS proxies from Syria to Ukraine in order to fight the Russian-speaking Ukrainians in the Donbass region. More of this below:
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/447536-isis-chechen-islamists-ukraine/
gravenimage says
Why does christianblood continually pretend that I support the creation of Bosnia and Kosovo and the abuse of the remaining Christians there, when I never have?
But, as Wellington notes, christianblood has never said anything critical about Shari’ah in Chechnya–he has, in fact, frequently praised it.
Here, he refuses to say anything critical of vicious Muslims in Chechnya, even when they attack a Church and murder a parishioner:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/05/russia-muslims-with-guns-and-petrol-bombs-storm-church-murdering-two-police-officers-and-a-churchgoer
Sherri Lynch says
If murdering babies is stopped, it will save millions of lives, our honor, our civility, maybe even our nation.
marc says
Using the data here https://cst.org.uk/publications/cst-publications I worked out, as A Jew in the UK, I am 40 times more likely to be physically attacked in a hate crime on the street by a passing muslim than a non-muslim.
gravenimage says
Important and troubling statistic, Marc.
Wellington says
Mark Twain said there are lies, damn lies and then there are statistics. But here we most definitely have an exception to Twain’s rule.
This is simply a stunning difference that all who cherish freedom, truth and human life should know of.
oldblindjohn says
“Islamophobia is real. It is a targeted campaign to influence people to dehumanize and irrationally fear Muslims. To fear what we wear, to fear the choice of food we eat, to fear the way we pray and to fear the way we practice our faith,” Gamel Fouda said. (muslim imam).
Let’s check that: A phobia is an irrational fear. With muslim slaughtering unbeleivers around the world, is it irrational?
How we practice ou faith:
Quran (3:56) – “As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”
Quran (8:39) – “And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah”
Lets examine our options.
A person of faith may convert to islam.
A person of faith may not convert to islam. They must pay the tax and live as a dhimmi.
A person who is not of faith will be put to death.
Make your choice.
James Lincoln says
This factual report will NOT be reported in the mainstream media. It does not fit the Islamic/leftist narrative.
If a citizen of, say, the UK tried to post this on social media, the chances are that they would be deplatformed and investigated by the local police for a breach of the peace, lslamophobia, etc..
tim gallagher says
That was my reaction too, James. The left and mainstream media will refuse to report on these findings or claim that they are not true. These findings are exactly what I would expect, just from all the reports I come across (mostly at Jihad Watch) of Muslim attacks on Christians and other non-Muslims. The left are liars and hypocrites. They have zero integrity. I’m sure they’ll ignore the existence of this report’s findings. The way they refuse to tell the truth about Islam puts all of us in danger.
Wellington says
Your post, James, is a very sad one for this reason above all: Britain, and particularly England (and with due regards here and respect to Ecosse 1314), is where liberty, over the centuries, was painstakingly reborn after the first true experiment in liberty by the ancient Greeks came to a halt.
But in the last two decades or so, courtesy, among others, of powerful and influential nothings like Blair, Brown, Cameron and May, and a monarch who has remained silent as her once free nation has descended into unfree status, Britain has pathetically succumbed to cravenness, political correctness, multiculturalism, and the exculpation of the worst religion of all time.
And please, no one bother to tell me about how I have gotten the role of the British monarch wrong. I have read Baghehot et al. I know full well the role of the monarch under the British constitutional system—the monarch has the right to advise, be informed, warn, blah, blah, blah. But when your free nation which you inherited is free no more, and this certainly applies to Elizabeth II’s tenure, and you have done virtually nothing to keep the free nation you inherited free, then all you prove is the truth of an American President’s response, that of LBJ when told by an aide that he couldn’t put the American Presidency on the line, to wit, what good is any office if you can’t put it on the line from time to time? Elizabeth II has not put her office on the line and profound shame on her for this because she has done virtually nothing to keep her once free nation free. She should have risked everything for freedom, including the crown. She has not.
Beyond tragic. Beyond any Shakespearean tragedy. Yes, considering the age in which we live, with WMDs and such, the “tragic dimensions” of a Western nation not confronting head on the iniquity which is Islam and the suicidal stupidities which are political correctness and multiculturalism, are indeed beyond tragic. They are quite arguably criminal.
James Lincoln says
Wellington,
Stated:
“Your post, James, is a very sad one…”
Yes, very sad indeed.
When I post on Jihad Watch I do my very best to be accurate with the facts and use evidence-based logic. The end result is that my posts, like many others, are often depressing – and sad.
If I can find opportunities to post something about anti-jihad initiatives that are successful, I will also post about that.
But the truth about Islam needs to continue to be told – no matter the consequences.
gravenimage says
+1
Rufolino says
How do you know that “the Queen has done virtually nothing to keep a free nation free” ? Have you been present at the Prime Minister’s audiences with the Queen and listened to their telephone calls ?
You describe the Sovereign’s position in the Constitution (as described by WB) as “blah, blah, blah.”
If you feel the Queen should shatter and finish 1000 years of English monarchy over the current crisis, instead of constitutionally making the Government in power take the blame for this catastrophe, then I cannot agree with you.
“Time reveals truth” and recent British Governments will eventually be seen for what they were. I have little doubt that it will also be revealed that the Queen has been doing everything in her constutional power to preserve the values of the country she serves,, despite disastrous policies of government.
One of the greatest crises in British history is possibly looming. I’m certain the Queen feels that the Monarchy, and respect for individuals (which the Queen embodies) MUST survive whatever is coming.. The symbolic importance of the Monarchy and its values in the British psyche would be hard to overestimate.
Wellington says
Don’t agree. Not at all. Here we have a major disagreement, Rufolino.
The Queen and the entire Royal Family have said virtually nothing as their nation has descended into a non-free nation and with Muslim immigration continuing and obnoxious political correctness becoming worse by the year. And if she has been saying anything constructive to her recent Prime Ministers it hasn’t shown at all by any PM’s actions which continue in dismal mode where the preservation of liberty is concerned.
As Paul Johnson pointed out in his history of England, Queen Victoria must have been delighted again and again as she regularly went beyond the role of a constitutional monarch and often did what she pleased, Bagehot, et al. notwithstanding. Queen Elizabeth II should have done the same by now as her nation has become unfree. Do you have any evidence that she has done anything minus an anodyne, generic statement here and there about what a shame such and such a tragedy has occurred? She should have by now, as did the Danish Queen who is also restricted as a constitutional monarch, said things very publicly to the effect that if you come to the UK you must be ready to accept our values or don’t come at all. She has done none of this and shame on her here. Actually, if she had done this I feel certain much of Britain would have rallied around her and the government would have been thrown back on its heels and on the defensive, which it surely so deserves.
I used to be an admirer of the British monarchy. No more. She’s been as publicly silent as King Victor Emmanuel III was while Mussolini turned Italy into a dictatorship. Britain was a free nation when Elizabeth came to the throne in 1952 but between Leftism, pc/mc and Islam it is now a free nation no longer and a de facto kind of dictatorship now exists and with London now very much Londonistan. That she has not PUBLICLY spoken out about all this is a disgrace. She should have risked all by now and she hasn’t. Unforgivable.
gravenimage says
Rufolino, George VI spoke out against Fascism.
The idea that the Queen has to be absolutely silent on the threat of Islam to Britain or else the monarchy would fall is mistaken.
CRUSADER says
Some might say this DOES fit the narrative:
Christian privilege ranking higher, once again.
UNCLE VLADDI says
This is true of muslims vs non-muslims in general, and it always has been:
According to their own Eastern histories, islam has an official 1,400 year history of “holy” lies, extortions, robberies, tortures, arsons, kindappings, slaveries, rapes and 270 million murders (that’s OVER A QUARTER-BILLION INNOCENTS SACRIFICED TO ALLAH, so far – it’s a larger death-tally than that of EVERYONE ELSE, both secular and religious, COMBINED, and with an historical average of less than 1% of the global population to have committed it with, too)!
Do the math: 270 million divided by 1,400 is almost 200,000 per year, or over 500 per day, or over 20 per hour or about one person every three minutes being murdered by Muslims ever since Islam was founded.
So, simply and precisely because of their “THOU SHALT KILL!” (Qur’an 2:191, 4:89, 9:5) cultural indoctrination, MUSLIMS ARE STILL FROM BETWEEN FOUR AND SEVERAL HUNDRED TIMES MORE LIKELY TO ENGAGE IN MURDER (and all other crimes,) THAN EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD!