In light of the West’s accelerating surrender to Sharia, which includes the disallowance of truth-telling about the Hijab (i.e. Fox News’ suspension of Judge Jeanine) and non-Muslims’ donning of the Hijab (i.e. New Zealand’s Prime Minister), The Glazov Gang has deemed it urgent to bring attention to the true meaning of the Hijab. It is a meaning that, due to the Unholy Alliance’s control over the boundaries of our discourse, will never be mentioned in our establishment media and higher culture.
Below, make sure to watch our 10-Part Series on The Hijab’s Real Meaning!
Part 1: In Defense of Judge Jeanine.
WATCH: CLICK HERE.
Part 2: Sinead O’Connor No Longer White After Islamic Conversion!
WATCH: CLICK HERE.
Part 3: Trying on Hijab and Liberation!
WATCH: CLICK HERE.
Part 4: Iranian Woman’s 20-Year Sentence for Protesting Hijab.
WATCH: CLICK HERE.
Part 5: Australian Broadcasting Corporation Celebrates Hijab.
WATCH: CLICK HERE.
Part 6: Freedom-From-Hijab Movement in Iran.
WATCH: CLICK HERE.
Part 7: Iran’s Martyrs and the Left’s Malicious Silence.
WATCH: CLICK HERE.
Part 8: Mattel’s Hijab-Wearing Enslaved Barbie.
WATCH: CLICK HERE.
Part 9: Lies About Hijab 101.
WATCH: CLICK HERE.
Part 10: What a Woman in Hijab is Really Saying to You.
WATCH: CLICK HERE.
*
Order Jamie Glazov’s new book: Jihadist Psychopath: How He Is Charming, Seducing, and Devouring Us.
Please donate through our new Unified-4-People Campaign or via our Pay Pal account.
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov.
Jim Austin says
Feminism is leftist bait and switch.
The bait is women’s rights, equality, safety, all righteous goals, truly “a standard to which the wise and honest can repair,” as George Washington would say, with opposition largely confined to the ignorant, the bigoted, the malevolent, the incredibly stupid.
Then the left switches 180 degrees to support the very opposite. They ally themselves with a death cult that explicitly legitimizes and validates abuse and oppression of women, where the areas they dominate are scenes of female genital mutilations, honor killings, rape, sex slavery, child marriages, legalized wife beating and murder of assertive women.
Feminists end up defending and supporting, as in, aiding and abetting, as in, becoming rank apologists for, the worst, most misogynist faction ever to infest this planet.
James Lincoln says
Jim Austin,
You are correct regarding feminism being “leftist bait and switch”…
And the left is experiencing more than cognitive dissonance, they are actually schizophrenic.
CRUSADER says
So, the LEFT is really RIGHT?
180 degrees.
Green/Red Axis really is more of a Green/Black?
(Islamist/Leftis) ——— (Islamist/FascisticRightWing)
CRUSADER says
This is a good statement by Hugh Fitzgerald:
———————————
“Islamophobia” is the word invented by apologists for Islam to suggest that any criticism of Islam, no matter how sober, measured, and evidence-based it may be, is actually “an irrational fear or hatred of Islam.”
The word is meant to deliberately misrepresent all reasoned criticism as merely a “phobia.” This sleight of word, by dint of repetition, has had its effect in silencing many potential critics of Islam who do not wish to be seen as “islamophobes.”
They need a word to describe themselves; the best candidate, I have often suggested, is the sober “islamocritic,” which does not condemn those who are critical of Islam.
So….
ISLAMOCRITIC
it is, then….
gravenimage says
Glazov Gang: The Hijab’s Real Meaning: A 10-Part Series
………………
Great series. I’m still getting through it, but very important stuff here.
na says
In India one man stoned to death by Imams. The reason was Indian demon God Shiva and Ganapathi was residing inside alleged mans stomach.
CRUSADER says
I just vomited into my niqāb.
UNCLE VLADDI says
It is a religious mandate in Islam that women be covered up or invite sex attacks:
(Quran 24:31) “And tell the believing women to reduce [some] of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which [necessarily] appears thereof, and to wrap their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, [their slaves] or those male attendants having no physical desire, [eunuchs] or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known [by jiggling] what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah in repentance, all of you, O believers, that you might succeed.”
If a woman does not cover up, she is fair game to be assaulted:
(Quran 33:59) “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.”
Further, Islam Teaches Irresponsibility:
Islam teaches irresponsibility. It’s nothing more than a list of victim-blaming excuses for its members’ own criminal desires and actions. In this way it is exactly like the teachings of its Western libertine “liberal” counterparts.
Criminals in general insist there are no real crimes nor criminals, because we’re all only ever helpless victims anyway – of predestined, “inevitable” circumstances beyond our control / victims of “society” / mere “products” of our environments (or, as their god, Karl Marx put it, of “historical predeterminism”) and as their holy mobster “muslim” brethren prefer to proudly put it, “slaves of unknown and unknowable allah!”
Literal “Psycho-paths” (Greek for “Thought-Killers”) fear fear (the thought of the mere memory of previous pains) AS more pain, and so hate thinking in both them selves and in all others. They also hate music and sex, because it induces a loss of control.
Thus while Muhammad had to show his sexual strength, he also had to bow to others’ complaints about seeing his wives going potty at night.
From Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 4, Number 148:
Narrated ‘Aisha:
“The wives of the Prophet used to go to Al-Manasi, a vast open place (near Baqia at Medina) to answer the call of nature at night. ‘Umar used to say to the Prophet “Let your wives be veiled,” but Allah’s Apostle did not do so. One night Sauda bint Zam’a the wife of the Prophet went out at ‘Isha’ time and she was a tall lady. ‘Umar addressed her and said, “I have recognized you, O Sauda.” He said so, as he desired eagerly that the verses of Al-Hijab (the observing of veils by the Muslim women) may be revealed. So Allah revealed the verses of “Al-Hijab”” (A complete body cover excluding the eyes)….!
While any other self-respecting warlord would have had the peeping toms executed for spying on his wives at night, Muhammad agreed with Umar the peeper that they should have to cover up at all times, lest they induce lust in “unsuspecting” muslims, and that’s how the whole burka/hijab notion arose, described in Sura 33:59.
The hijab doesn’t express cultural diversity, so enabling it isn’t an expression of inclusive tolerance.
There’s nothing in islam about it concerning any false “modesty” before god!
Libertine “liberal” criminals never investigate what they support in public, because their motive is always biased slander anyway: they are victim-blaming slanderous masochists, always trying to prevent other people’s presumed racism before it starts. Committing crimes – “pre-emptively defensive” attacks – in advance of others’ presumed attacks, is what these fraudulent virtue-signalling hypocrite criminals are all about.
The Hijab, (or Niqab, or burka) is not a religious duty or fashion trend, it’s only a prison uniform!
It is also a victim-blaming insult to both sexes; theQur’an’s Sura 33:59 is a slanderous statement that implies the muslim men (and all men, just like Muhammad himself allegedly was) are so at the mercy of their hormones, that they must molest and rape any and all women they can see; so it’s always the women’s own fault for not covering up.
It also says the muslim men have a duty to molest and rape all the infidel women for not covering up!
“O Prophet! Tell your wives and daughters and the believing women to draw their cloaks over their bodies. That will be better so that they will be known so as not to be molested. And Allâh is Most Forgiving, Most Merciful.” (Qur’ân 33:59)
So, exactly HOW will they “be known,” in the freedom sack?!
Certainly not as in: “Oh, I know her! Hi, Mary!” – but “known” as muslimas – as members of the gang!
And why is this important? “So as not to be molested!”
Which again implies that muslims DID and always WILL “molest” (i.e: rape,) all the NON-muslim (“infidel”) women!
That it’s the infidel women’s faults, because they don’t cover up, that the muslim men “must” molest (rape) them!
And the Qur’an itself confirms their holy right and duty to rape infidel women.
Muhammad also said women are created by allah as domesticated animals, created for men’s pleasure, and like fields to be tilled at will by men.
So islam is also the “Religion of Rape!”
;-(