For years, Western analysts at all points on the political spectrum have used the qualifier “radical” when speaking about jihadis (“radical Islamists”) and their motivating ideology (“radical Islam” or “radical extremism”). The point was to preserve the fiction that Islam is a religion of peace that doesn’t teach violence against unbelievers, and that the “radicals” were twisting and misusing its teachings.
And now, in Britain’s far-Left Guardian, Ali Nobil Ahmad wants non-Muslims to accept the idea of “radical Muslims” as a good thing. He says he isn’t referring to jihad terrorists, but if his words are heeded, the effect will be greater complacency regarding jihadis, and even more hesitancy among British authorities to do anything about the problem they present. Britain will become even more prostrate before the advancing jihad than it already is.
Did the Guardian publish Nazi propaganda in 1942?
“Why it’s OK for young Muslims to be radical,” by Ali Nobil Ahmad, Guardian, February 28, 2019:
The legal and moral conundrums posed by the return (or not) of British jihadis following the collapse of the Islamic State “caliphate” has triggered renewed anxiety about the place of Muslim youth in western society. The home secretary, Sajid Javid’s populist bid to strip Shamima Begum of citizenship has heightened the pitch of an emotive debate. But little has changed in Britain’s approach to counter-terrorism, soon to undergo independent review following years of heavy criticism.
The Prevent strategy places entire communities under suspicion without necessarily being effective. European equivalents have fared similarly. A €2.5m French deradicalisation boot camp in the Loire valley asked participants to sing the national anthem, eat non-halal food and learn “Republican values” without rehabilitating a single individual.
When policymakers talk about preventing “radicalisation”, they are missing the point: there’s nothing inherently wrong with being radical. The term can simply mean rejection of the status quo. The French and American revolutions, universal suffrage and the end of colonialism all involved political subversion. Politics has long been ideological and international. (Think George Orwell and the Spanish civil war).
Yet still we talk about Muslim youth in the hackneyed language of the early 2000s, in which “radical” ideas must be neutralised through social engineering. A good (Muslim) citizenry, in this logic, is politically docile, disengaged from world affairs and discouraged from combining religion with political activism.
Muslims of my generation, growing up in the 70s and 80s, were inspired by radical ideas derived from secular humanism. Confronted with racial and social injustice in Britain, many of us found solace and solidarity in third worldism and socialist internationalism – without subscribing to indiscriminate violence.
Muslims in the UK who have grown up after 2001 have done so in an era of nihilistic surrender to the capitalist world order and the political status quo. Unsurprisingly, some have veered towards one or the other current extremes of political Islam.
Of course, the reasons hundreds were seduced by the death cult of Isis cannot be explained solely by a lack of alternatives. Recruitment was driven as much by crass adventurism and bloodlust. The public is justified in feeling revulsion towards returning marauders, whose crimes should be prosecuted with the full force of British and international law.
But the choices of a few cannot be allowed to bar generations of young Muslims from trying to change the world. Rather than view them with fear, a supposedly open society like the UK should ask how their dynamic potential can be allowed to flourish….
Buraq says
If it’s hip and ‘radical’ to reject the status quo, then why don’t Muslims reject Islam’s 1,400 year old status quo – murder, harass, rape and steal from anyone who is not a Muslim? Ali Nobil Ahmad is a clown!
Ashley says
+1
Thanks for that comment, Buraq!
Yeah, it sure would be radical for a Muslim to reject Islam’s status quo. Radical, extreme, and revolutionary!
gravenimage says
Spot on, Buraq!
Emilie Green says
“Why it’s OK for young Muslims to be radical”
Not only OK, it’s required by their prophet’s own book.
Why I’ve heard Muslims themselves say that unless you’re a jihadi fighting in the cause of Islam, then you’re not even a Muslim and your chance for paradise is non-existent.
Henry Mansfield says
The Guardian is pure garbage.
Before the first convictions in Rotherham I was seeing mention of the Pakistani pedophile networks by bloggers, and when I’d check the British press for corroboration there was little to nothing.
The Guardian sticks in my memory for it’s purposeful ignorance on the subject even after people started going to jail. Just enough coverage to be able to say they did their job.
mortimer says
OK, Ali Nobil Ahmad thinks ‘nothing wrong with being a radical’.
RADICAL JIHADIST HEADCHOPPER … RADICAL NAZI DEATH CAMP GUARD ?
“What’s the big deal?’, he asks us.
Don’t ALL YOUNG PEOPLE chop heads off and shove human bodies into gas ovens?
(sarc/off)
mortimer says
BTW, Ali, why would we WANT a generation of young Muslims to ‘change the world’?
They have the wrong ideology. We DO NOT WANT THEIR INSANE IDEOLOGY in our world.
Terry Gain says
Mortimer
We have their insane ideology in our world and in our government and some otherwise sane people are even calling it a religion.
karl anglin says
The Quran defines Moslem behavior.
gravenimage says
Exactly, Mortimer.
Krishna says
Dear Ali Nobil Ahmad Muslims were secular and humanistic in 1970s because Sharia law wasn’t implemented in Muslim countries
Terry Gain says
Nonsense.
gravenimage says
To the extent that Muslims were less of a threat to the West in the 1970s and ’80s, it was because Muslims had not invaded the West in such numbers as are here now. That’s the only reason.
Angus66 says
EXACTLY.
When their numbers are low they are typically non-threatening & peaceful.
As their numbers grow they become decidedly less so…
gravenimage says
+1
Jayell says
With the UK Race Relations Acts firmly in place by the time this joker was growing up, one has to ask what level of ‘racial and social injustice’ he actually suffered, unless his perceptions were all relative to the inflated self-images that this particular community has always had. Although muslims can hardly have amounted to much more than 1-2% of the UK population about 30-40 years ago, they were already throwing their weight around with impertinent and intrusive prosyletising campaigns and demands for their ‘holy days’ to be observed on the national calendar, so not being treated with with any undue deference may have been bruising to their excessive egos and infringed their overbearing sense of entitlement. In.which the answer would have to go away and find somewhere else that reciprocated their delusions of importance.
Naildriver says
Typical ‘good cop, bad cop’ maneuver that gives Islam, as a whole deniability in its pernicious progress to place a strangle hold upon British society’s ability to stop this invasion.
It’s similar to the argument seen on city buses saying jihad isn’t a threat — since ‘hey! My jihad is doing 50 squats every morming, so I can better serve coffee at Starbucks. Or my jihad is going to college and becoming a good Muslim doctor!’
What is interesting here is, now being a more devoted Muslim is good because Islam is good, and we don’t have to apologize for that.
It’s like a ratchet where eventually we will hear arguments along the line’s of ‘ leave us to our honor killing, wife beating, FGM and child molestation! You who are not Muslim must accept this! After all, we are merely practicing our freedom of religion, so mind your own business!’
Islam, from the top needs to roundly be declared a menace in the West and USA. Islam needs to be treated as the communists and Nazi, and soon! or this insanity will be an unstoppable metastasis.
Terry Gain says
Naildriver
“Islam, from the top needs to roundly be declared a menace in the West and USA. Islam needs to be treated as the communists and Nazi, and soon! or this insanity will be an unstoppable metastasis.”
…………
Most people believe religious belief should be above criticism, so while I agree with you about what needs to be done I don’t believe it will be done until we are disabused of this foolish notion that Islam is a religion.
Naildriver says
It reveals the weakness most people have in upholding their own professed convictions and beliefs, as in Christanity.
As if they fear their particular belief may be deemed a sham therefore all these systems needs protection.
Freedom of religion wasn’t about maintaining the systems of our enemies, particularly by the government.
James Lincoln says
President Trump should lead the charge and NOT use the word “radical” when referring to Islamic terrorism.
All other Western government officials should follow suit.
CRUSADER says
So, if black communities can arm up…
And there is a Muslim Community Patrol in NYC….
Then, how would this program below effect matters?
———————————-
Black Guns Matter founder says conservatives should reach out to potential allies in inner cities
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/black-guns-matter-founder-on-conservatives-problems-reaching-urban-communities
The film “Black Panther” depicted conservative values, argues Maj Toure, founder of Black Guns Matter.
African-American guns rights activist Maj Toure says conservatives have to do a better job of appealing people in urban communities. His remarks came Thursday during an interview with National Rifle Association board member Willes Lee at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) near Washington.
As the founder of Black Guns Matter — a group that educates people in urban communities on their Second Amendment rights through firearms training and education — Toure said inner-city Americans have been left out of the conversation when it comes to gun rights.
“The conservative room, has honestly, not done enough for urban America,” Toure said. “It’s just what it is. That doesn’t mean that’s where we stay. That means we have to create liaisons. When you say ‘urban America’ I mean a group of people you just named: Asians, Hispanics, blacks, Latin, white. … We have to do more in that regard and put more boots on the ground. If not, we can – and will – lose.”
Toure has proposed arming urban residents and giving them proper training in an effort to curb violence that exists in cities like Chicago despite strict gun laws. He’s touted New Hampshire in the past where a license is no longer needed to carry a concealed weapon.
“More so than just giving young urban people, of all races, firearms, giving them education about Second Amendment rights, giving them more education about conflict resolution and de-escalation tactics ‘cause that’s completely missing in urban areas like the city of Chicago,” Toure told FOX Business in 2017.
After last week’s appearance at CPAC, Toure told Politico that he began advocating for gun rights in the inner cities after seeing friends locked up for avoidable gun possession charges. He wants to continue the legacy of Malcolm X, the black nationalist who was assassinated in 1965, who expressed softer views on race following his pilgrimage to the holy Muslim city of Mecca.
“We go where there’s high violence, high crime, high gun control — high slave mentalities, to be perfectly honest — and inform urban America about their human right, as stated in the Second Amendment, to defend their life,” Toure told the magazine.
“We go where there’s high violence, high crime, high gun control — high slave mentalities, to be perfectly honest — and inform urban America about their human right, as stated in the Second Amendment, to defend their life.”
— Maj Toure, founder, Black Guns Matter
The majority of America is conservative, but the way conservatives have vocalized their ideals has resulted in a “language barrier” with urban residents, conservative website Townhall reported.
Reduce inner city crime with more guns, training?
“The conservative movement has failed where we have not created enough and supported enough urban liaisons. The Left has done an amazing job of convincing urban America that the conservative room is a Klan rally. They’ve done it,” Toure said. “[They’re] saying these things to say they don’t trust you. People, right now, urban America, under a falsehood, does not trust you. What liaisons have you linked with that are already doing the work in urban America to highlight and spread our ideals of freedom?”
Aside from gun rights, Toure said his mission is to extend conservative values to urban communities. He argued the film “Black Panther” depicted conservative values in the fictional African nation of Wakanda.
“Think about it,” he said. “Border security; we’re working on our own thing; we don’t really bang with too many outsiders.”
Terry Gain says
If you think the Islamic threat can be put down with guns, you are dreaming in technicolor. Use your guns against Muslims and you will find in a NYC minute that the government has turned its bigger guns and better marksmen on you. Islam will be defeated at the ballot box or it will prevail.
CRUSADER says
Concerned more about Muslims “policing” their own ‘hoods….
Savvy Kafir says
Terry — History has proven you wrong on this point, over & over again — right up to the present day. When things get bad enough, it always comes down to force. Some people would rather die fighting than see their countries become Islamic sh*tholes. Violent revolution and/or civil war may be the only salvation for some European countries at this point. (As JFK put it: “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”)
Some would rather risk death for the cause of freedom than surrender to a tyrannical government. That’s why the Founding Fathers gave us the Second Amendment. And, contrary to the opinion of more “realistic” people who think liberty-loving Second Amendment supporters are “dreaming in Technicolor”, you don’t hear military officers who fought in Afghanistan or Iraq telling us that guns in the hands of civilians are worthless when going up against the might of a modern army, air force, or police force.
Brenda Marty says
I guess it will be okay for Western boys to be radical too.
Savvy Kafir says
It’s okay for ANY Muslims to be “radical” — as long as it’s okay for us to eliminate them if they set foot in the West.
We need to start treating these savages like the enemy combatants they clearly are. But so far, only one side in this global conflict seems to realize that we are at war.
Terry Gain says
Only one side is at war. We are at submission.
sheliak says
This article is a virtual half step by the Guardian toward supporting islamic jihad itself. A qualitative shift of propaganda strategy by the western progressive media that, even though inevitable, is deeply worrying.
tim gallagher says
I don’t believe for a moment that Muslims, the moderate or the murderous “radical” types have got anything worthwhile to offer our more evolved, more civilised, non-Muslim western societies. So when this creep says that UK society should be happy to let the Muslim radical mindset “flourish” I think he’s talking unadulterated crap. My view of the “radical” Muslim is that he or she is a person who is a clear danger to all of us non-Muslims, a person who is extremely likely to attempt to kill us in a terrorist attack. This creep’s idiotic opinions seem to be yet another example of that sickening mindset that Muslims have where ( I guess because they are told they are the “best of people”, even though they are the worst people from the point of view of non-Muslims) they seem to think it’s OK for them to spend their time murdering us non-Muslims, raping non-Muslim women and girls and yet we are somehow supposed to think that’s OK. We should welcome it and let it “flourish”. Yeah, right. Keep Islam out of all non-Muslim countries. It’s the only policy that will work when dealing with this malignant ideology which is so clearly our enemy and has been for 1400 years.
Terry Gain says
Yes. It is an evil ideology. And the only solution short of a civil war or submission is to keep them out. But the majority won’t support keeping Muslims out unless satisfied that it is an evil conquest ideology rather than a religion with some bad apples or hijackers.
tim gallagher says
Yes, Terry, I keep hoping that enough people in our societies will wake up to the evil threat that Islam represents. Then, they’ll demand that our governments stop letting this enemy (as you rightly say, a “conquest ideology”) into our countries. The only countries that I think are doing the right thing in relation to Islam are Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland. People there seem wide awake to the evil that Islam represents. I’m certainly worried that the populations of our countries won’t wake up in time. Maybe it’ll take civil wars in many countries in the long run because people don’t seem to be waking up soon enough..
gravenimage says
Guardian runs piece entitled “Why it’s OK for young Muslims to be radical”
……………………
Is the Guardian *insane*? Are they just hoping to up their circulation through being provocative–in which case, do they not care that this will lead to the oppression and death of Britons?
Or are they now true believers in the horrors of Islam?
More:
For years, Western analysts at all points on the political spectrum have used the qualifier “radical” when speaking about jihadis (“radical Islamists”) and their motivating ideology (“radical Islam” or “radical extremism”). The point was to preserve the fiction that Islam is a religion of peace that doesn’t teach violence against unbelievers, and that the “radicals” were twisting and misusing its teachings.
……………………
Yes–but with this article, now they are not even bothering with this fiction–which is actually even worse.
More:
And now, in Britain’s far-Left Guardian, Ali Nobil Ahmad wants non-Muslims to accept the idea of “radical Muslims” as a good thing…
……………………
Is Ahmed *really* leaving Jihad terror out of the mix here? Even if he was, this would still cover the desire to impose brutal Shari’ah law on Britain and the rest of the West.
Here is his book, where he condones Jihad rape in the West:
“Masculinity, Sexuality and Illegal Migration : Human Smuggling from Pakistan to Europe”
https://www.bookdepository.com/Masculinity-Sexuality-Illegal-Migration-Ali-Nobil-Ahmad/9781409409755
More:
The legal and moral conundrums posed by the return (or not) of British jihadis following the collapse of the Islamic State “caliphate” has triggered renewed anxiety about the place of Muslim youth in western society.
……………………
Is Ahmed admitting that a large number of Muslims in Britain identified with a place where they could enslave and slaughter Infidels? Why are we supposed to sympathize with this?
More:
The home secretary, Sajid Javid’s populist bid to strip Shamima Begum of citizenship has heightened the pitch of an emotive debate. But little has changed in Britain’s approach to counter-terrorism, soon to undergo independent review following years of heavy criticism.
……………………
In other words, how *dare* the UK try to protect her citizens from Jihad terrorists who preach their murder–no matter how unevenly? The idea that Britain should change that–instead of strengthening it–is just sickening, but hardly surprising from this pious Muslim.
More:
The Prevent strategy places entire communities under suspicion without necessarily being effective. European equivalents have fared similarly. A €2.5m French deradicalisation boot camp in the Loire valley asked participants to sing the national anthem, eat non-halal food and learn “Republican values” without rehabilitating a single individual.
……………………
This just shows that Muslims cannot be disabused of their adherence to Jihad, since it is a core part of Islam.
More:
When policymakers talk about preventing “radicalisation”, they are missing the point: there’s nothing inherently wrong with being radical. The term can simply mean rejection of the status quo.
……………………
Right–in this case, the “status quo” they are rejecting is the ability of Infidels to live free of Muslim oppression. The idea that any rejection of any status quo is a good thing is of course absurd.
More:
The French and American revolutions, universal suffrage and the end of colonialism all involved political subversion. Politics has long been ideological and international. (Think George Orwell and the Spanish civil war).
……………………
Muslims are trying to bring about the very opposite of these things, of course.
More:
Yet still we talk about Muslim youth in the hackneyed language of the early 2000s, in which “radical” ideas must be neutralised through social engineering. A good (Muslim) citizenry, in this logic, is politically docile, disengaged from world affairs and discouraged from combining religion with political activism.
……………………
This implies that the only way a Muslim can be engaged in world affairs is by waging violent Jihad. Or is this what Ahmad is actually acknowledging?
The idea that it is somehow old-fashioned for us not to want to be raped, murdered, or conquered by Muslims is just sickening.
More:
Muslims of my generation, growing up in the 70s and 80s, were inspired by radical ideas derived from secular humanism. Confronted with racial and social injustice in Britain, many of us found solace and solidarity in third worldism and socialist internationalism – without subscribing to indiscriminate violence.
……………………
No, Islam has nothing to do with Humanism–nor even with Socialsm. It only has to do with Islam, although Muslims may cynically adopt some of the language of other ideologies if it furthers there goals–primarily of having Islam seem less threatening than it is. This is exactly what Ahmad is doing here.
More:.
Muslims in the UK who have grown up after 2001 have done so in an era of nihilistic surrender to the capitalist world order and the political status quo.
……………………
In other words, this Muslim thug considers Muslims embracing democracy and freedom to be “nihilistic”. Grotesque. In reality, there is nothing so nihilistic as Islam and its oppressive bloody horrors.
More:
Unsurprisingly, some have veered towards one or the other current extremes of political Islam.
……………………
Why is this unsurprising? Only because Islam rejects all civilized creeds.
More:
Of course, the reasons hundreds were seduced by the death cult of Isis cannot be explained solely by a lack of alternatives. Recruitment was driven as much by crass adventurism and bloodlust. The public is justified in feeling revulsion towards returning marauders, whose crimes should be prosecuted with the full force of British and international law.
……………………
Does anyone believe that Ahmad really believes this? He just knew that he would have to throw Infidel readers a bone. Even Guardian readers are apt to be rather horrified *by ISIS*.
More:
But the choices of a few cannot be allowed to bar generations of young Muslims from trying to change the world. Rather than view them with fear, a supposedly open society like the UK should ask how their dynamic potential can be allowed to flourish….
……………………
Yeah–the “dynamic potential” of trying to change Britain and the rest of the world into an Islamic sh*t hole.
I hope even Guardian readers reject this vicious evil.
tim gallagher says
Very good dissection, gravenimage, of what this treacherous Muslim apologist is really all about. And here’s the leftist “Guardian” giving him a pulpit to preach his garbage from. So many on the left of politics (I guess because they hate western civilisation so much) are such sellout merchants, surrendering to Islam’s barbarous agenda at every opportunity. I agree with you when you say that all that these Muslims have to offer the world is to turn every part of the world into “Islamic sh*t holes”. Islam is a blight on humanity. The only “dynamic potential” Muslims have is a huge potential for destroying civilised ways of life, and dragging us all back to a primitive, barbaric way of living. It is hard to believe that anyone, as you say “even Guardian readers” would fall this man’s garbage. But some probably will.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Tim. The Guardian never should have given this Muslim thug a platform.
I wish the Guardian had allowed comments to this story. Even with their left-of-center readership, I doubt many would approve of this madness.
brane pilot says
To a space alien it would appear that all western democracies are committing demographic and cultural suicide; with a few small exceptions who will be overwhelmed later in the game.
The space aliens would wonder why, and what motivated them to pursue this course.
I also wonder.
The problem is not Islam. That is just a symptom.
The problem goes much deeper than that.
We are looking at an entire civilization that has lost the will to live.
UNCLE VLADDI says
The real question is: Why is it still pretended to be OK for anyone to be considered a “muslim,” ever?!
Pretending that the global crime-gang called islam is a “race” of poor swarthy animal-people, oppressed by the mentally superior whites, in order to slander everyone who notices it’s a crime-gang as a hatefully bigoted “racist” – is to deliberately enable that crime-gang’s crimes by hiding and destroying the evidence of same, and thus to be a willing accessory to those crimes. Since islam is a murder-gang, and the penalty for committing and enabling the commission of murder is DEATH, anyone and everyone who calls an opponent of muslims, islam, and their global jihad, a “racist!” should be lawfully put to death.
Everyone who defends islam and muslims endorses crime.
Endorsing crime IS a crime, so those doing it are criminals.
Right in the Qur’an is: the obligation to murder Jews and Christians (Surah 9:29), to terrorize all non-Muslims (8:12), to rape young girls (65:4), to enslave people for sex (4:3), to lie about one’s true goals (3:54), and the command to make war on all the infidels (9:123) and subjugate the entire world to Allah (9:33).
Are death-threats legal? NO.
Is extortion legal? NO.
Is slavery legal? NO.
Is murder legal? NO.
Is rape legal? NO.
THEN ISLAM IS ILLEGAL!
Rape, slavery, robbery, extortion and murder are never OK!
Everything muslims pretend to see as “holy” is already a crime!
So nobody has a legal right to practice islam anywhere on earth!
IN TRYING TO MAKE CRITICISM OF THE GLOBAL CRIME GANG CALLED “ISLAM” INTO A CRIME, TO PROTECT THAT CRIME GANG BY HIDING THE EVIDENCE OF ITS CRIMES, SUCH PEOPLE ARE CRIMINALS AND TRAITORS TO RATIONALITY, CIVILIZATION, AND HUMANITY ITSELF.
But – hadn’t you heard?!
Being angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow victims,” is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!
Having no facts, logic, or reasonable arguments with which to defend their own crimes and treason, criminals must in stead substitute this global attempt to control our very thinking – through an emotional, sub-conscious “narrative” – so much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:
“Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”
Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!
Joe says
“open society like the UK should ask how their dynamic potential can be allowed to flourish”
—————————————-
With that statement, he inadvertently hit the nail on the head. The answer is easy, the UK should call out the sin of Islam. Whether something flourishes in the long term is the definition of “good”. Anything that prevents “good” is bad. Nothing flourishes under Islam. If anyone remembers, these people were allowed into the UK as “refugees” from Islamic nations. Yet, the UK encourages the very thing that made them refugees, Islam.
Savvy Kafir says
It’s time to change that. The greatest & most enlightened civilization the world has ever produced — that of the modern West — cannot simply lie down and allow itself to be eliminated by Islam, the most savage & barbaric ideology the world has ever produced. And the sooner we start fighting back, the better — in terms of minimizing the bloodshed & societal upheaval, and improving our odds of success.
Once Muslims move into an area in large numbers, they never give up their efforts to subjugate the local infidels, except at gunpoint. This time will be no different. And it will be far better if the guns put to that use are those of Western governments, rather than those of desperate individuals and ad hoc groups.
Savvy Kafir says
This was meant to be a reply to Terry Gain’s comment: “Only one side is at war. We are at submission.”
gravenimage says
Great post, Savvy Kafir.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Re: “The greatest & most enlightened civilization the world has ever produced — that of the modern West — cannot simply lie down and allow itself to be eliminated by Islam, the most savage & barbaric ideology the world has ever produced.”
Wrong. The very same main factor which enabled the West to prosper – individualism – is the very same trait which will destroy it. Now, let’s examine the historical facts: Who created the West? Let’s also define terms: Intelligence is speed of thought and memory. Smarts or wisdom is how one uses that intelligence (hint: honesty is the best policy, and deliberately self-inflicted paranoia leads to all other ultimately stupid “mental illnesses”). cf: Stupid but intelligent people can do really dumb things quickly and accurately, and they usually do.
The White Curse is that increased intelligence leads to a certain type of stupidity denied to the less intelligent breeds: the one and only real drawback of White intelligence is that the ability to see so far into the future leads some of the more weak-minded ones (“liberals”) to see all the potential problems as inevitable, and so they become paranoid masochists who hypocritically pretend to instantly compromise with and Submit to (and actually cause or induce others to cause) those very same problems which cause those pains they fear the most! That way, they can pretend to ‘control’ and cancel the additional pains caused by fearing them! Notice how all the destructive self-hating “liberals” are whites/Jews! No other breeds on earth act that way!
MJP says
Then it should be ok to kill these creatures when they perform radical behavior