Jeanine Pirro said: “Think about this: She’s not getting this anti-Israel sentiment doctrine from the Democrat Party. So if it’s not rooted in the party, where is she getting it from? Think about it. Omar wears a hijab, which according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?”
For that, Fox rebuked her and demanded she apologize. She had no genuine reason to do so. Sharia is indeed inveterately antisemitic: the Qur’an demonizes the Jews in numerous ways. It depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).
Sharia also mandates that women cover their heads:
“And tell the believing women to reduce their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which appears thereof and to wrap their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah in repentance, all of you, O believers, that you might succeed.” (Qur’an 24:31)
“O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (Qur’an 33:59)
“Narrated `Aisha (the wife of the Prophet): `Umar bin Al-Khattab used to say to Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) “Let your wives be veiled” But he did not do so. The wives of the Prophet (ﷺ) used to go out to answer the call of nature at night only at Al-Manasi.’ Once Sauda, the daughter of Zam`a went out and she was a tall woman. `Umar bin Al-Khattab saw her while he was in a gathering, and said, ‘I have recognized you, O Sauda!’ He (`Umar) said so as he was anxious for some Divine orders regarding the veil (the veiling of women.) So Allah revealed the Verse of veiling. (Al-Hijab; a complete body cover excluding the eyes).” (Bukhari 79.14.6420)
Wearing hijab is a sign that one accepts these imperatives. That is not necessarily true, as lots of women of all perspectives wear headscarves, but when a Muslim woman wears hijab, it’s reasonable to surmise that she accepts the Qur’an and Sunnah, the sources of Sharia. Sharia denies the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, the equality of rights of women, and the equality of rights of non-Muslims. Wearing hijab is a sign of adherence to Sharia. So what did Judge Jeanine Pirro say that was wrong about Ilhan Omar? She asked questions that need to be asked.
“Rep. Ilhan Omar Thanks Fox News For Condemning Jeanine Pirro – Update,” by Greg Evans, Deadline, March 11, 2019:
“We strongly condemn Jeanine Pirro’s comments about Rep. Ilhan Omar,” Fox News said in a statement last night. “They do not reflect those of the network and we have addressed the matter with her directly.”
Today, Omar thanked Fox News for its statement, tweeting, “Thank you, @FoxNews. No one’s commitment to our constitution should be questioned because of their faith or country of birth.”…
Bill says
Again a private citizen is condemned for his/her comments but sitting members of The House of Representatives are not questioned or scolded for their public anti-semitic comments….God Help The United States and God Help the next generation….
Terry Gain says
The next generation does not believe in God.
J D.S says
Right Terry….but neither does / did the last generation…I have lived in both generations and I can truthfully say that when there was an overwhelming belief in God then the world was a much better place to live and raise a family…Even the government was a better government.
Sam says
Yes sir! Agreed!
CRUSADER says
Founding Fathers believed that only morality steeped in Faith could lead a nation of free governance otherwise it leads to selfishness.
AMEN
+++++
Diana says
WTH Fox News! Don’t go that way pandering to the idiots. Don’t bite the hands that feed you.
Jule Bacal says
Yes, its sharia but I wish she wouldn’t have brought that up like its the most important issue. Its the least of issues in regard to Omar and her political Jihad. It just distracts everyone and gives rise to the islamophobe rants. I’d say leave the dress codes out for now and focus on the antiJew thing which is equal, if not More of a thing to Nazigroups (who also have to go) This is just to close to way things were 1930’s Germany. Millions of voices must be raised to put and end to this.
Garnett Rope says
Wearing that hijab is a sign of submission to men, to the koran. Shariah law is antithetical to our precious Constitution. No muslim, who is an total adherent to the koran can be in office.
mortimer says
The Islamic veil is the ULTIMATE symbol of misogyny and patriarchy.
Arlene Gilbert says
And a symbol of muslim superiority over us kafir.
Michael Copeland says
“No one’s commitment to our constitution should be questioned because of their faith…” – Omar.
Really?
“I am a traitor to America because my religion requires me to be” –
Samir Khan.
mortimer says
Veiling outside the home: Sharia Law – Reliance of the Traveller @M2.3
“A majority of scholars (n: with the exception of some Hanafis, as at m2.8 below) have been recorded as holding that it is unlawful for women to leave the house with faces unveiled, whether or not there is likelihood of temptation. When there is likelihood of temptation, scholars unanimously concur that it is unlawful, temptation meaning anything that leads to sexual intercourse or its usual preliminaries. As for when there is real need (dis: m2.11), looking is not unlawful, provided temptation is unlikely).
Jeanine Pirro is right: it is FORBIDDEN TO MUSLIM WOMEN TO GO ABOUT UNVEILED.
somehistory says
hilary clinton and the oic….making the honest free speech about islam receive punishment and “condemnation.” Through “shaming” and public ridicule, the truth about islam and the activities and goals and beliefs of moslims have been made off limits for exposure.
It is amazing that the majority of people say they support freedom of speech…and in fact, each individual wishes to have the freedom to speak as they think…while moslims have now gotten to the point of controlling the speech of the majority in order to cover up their evil…and the majority are giving in.
It is satan’s aim, through his “wild beast” and through its “image” and through his “false prophet,” to cause the whole of mankind to bow to the beast…which is bowing to him, satan…and this demon is using fear and intimidation to take away speech about it all.
Surely, the time for fulfillment of the other chapters of Revelation; 16, 17, 18, has come.
jj says
Great comment. So obvious. You see evidence of this every single day now. We’re further along than we want to think.
David Longfellow says
Omar is a willing slave to a cult.
duh swami says
The rabid left is going crazy over Piro…They want her fired and strung up…For what? Why bigotry, racism, Islamophobia, and being drunk on camera, of course…The FOX entity can no longer be trusted,,,They are giving aid and comfort to the enemy…Around here we call that treason…
Barbara Nakelski says
Are you kidding me?!! They wanted her to apologize for stating a fact?! What the hell is wrong with people, so cowed by those who adhere to this set of anti- Constitutional codes? I hope she didn’t apologize, I was applauding her when she said it…finally someone to stand up and speak the plain truth!!!
Terry Gain says
It seems to me that there are virtually no Establishment Americans who are willing to stand up to Islam.
Indiana Tom says
RINOs all.
Terry Gain says
Omar and Tlaib were allowed to take their oath of office on the War Manual of a Conquest Ideology. No one objected.
James Lincoln says
Terry,
Consider this: Omar and Tlaib represents just 2 of the 435 voting members of the US House of Representatives.
Consistent with Islam in general, their national influence is magnified manyfold.
Just imagine if the percentage of Muslims in the US Congress reached, say, 10%.
The results would be too awful to contemplate.
gravenimage says
Sadly, few Americans know what is in the Qur’an.
James says
It surprises me that Fox gave in to the Islamic lobby on this. As far as I can see, the judge has a reasonable position and does not need to apologize. Perhaps Fox was threatened by some powerful leftist or Islamic interest group and gave in. Omar is not a great intellectual or an expert on foreign affairs. Why in the world should the Dems be so forgiving and tolerant of her comments? What does she have to do with foreign affairs. In her questioning of Elliot Abrams she mispronounced Contra, and her text was written for her and she was reading it rather poorly. They could have had a computer reader. She mixed up farther and further too. Who needs her anyway?
Kay says
I saw the same thing— she couldn’t even read it understandably and it seemed clear she couldn’t then have written it. She gave her insult (untrustworthy) and didn’t allow a response.
She’s a tool.
somehistory says
Someone should do a photoshop of the woman saying “rape is not rape” alongside the above photo of omar. Both wearing the “headgear” of islam….just different versions…like two women wear skirts, one midi and the other maxi…just different personal choices, or how much they feel the need to conceal and how much of their skin to hide.
Someone do a photo shop…with a pertinent caption…of the two women…one in Syria saying, “rape is not rape” and the other of omar saying, “no one should be questioned.”
lebel says
“Sharia denies the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, the equality of rights of women, and the equality of rights of non-Muslims. Wearing hijab is a sign of adherence to Sharia. So what did Judge Jeanine Pirro say that was wrong about Ilhan Omar? She asked questions that need to be asked.”
She obviously does not believe in the “real” sharia since she is freely mixing with men, participating in Democracy etc. all these things are against Shariah so RS tells me. Of course that did not help Obama as despite owning a dog, drinking beer, listening to rap, having twerking unhihabed daughters and a non-Muslim, going to church, killing Bin Laden, supporting gay rights and women’s right only confirmed his Muslimness and stealth shariah agenda to jihadwatcher nutbars.
Of course the go to answer for jihadwatchers in such cases is simply…taqqiya! but then why wear a hijab at all? and why talk about Israel? why not just say “yeah I love Israel (wink, wink)”! of course that won’t help you either because you’re still a Muslim and therefore ultimately evil but you may earn a reprieve especially if you really grovel.
here’s the real deal: you shut your mouth about Israel, especially if you’re a Muslim. The rules are simple. Omar did not do that and she will pay.
Wellington says
You’re covering up yet again, lebel, for the worst religion of all time. And specifically as to why Omar would wear an hijab as opposed to not wearing one to deceive the kuffaar only all the more, the answer here is an easy one, to wit, Muslims try to get away with as much as possible and right now because loads of kuffaars still remain grossly ignorant of what Islam intends for us all (this would include Fox executives) it’s time for a wretched person like Omar to “push the envelope” in the direction of Mo’s creed just a little bit more by way of displaying an Islamic equivalent of the swastika—the hijab.
And yes, lebel, I am directly comparing Islam to Nazism. If you have a problem with this, I don’t give a damn. The latter preached a master race and the former preaches a master faith. Both are mortal enemies of freedom and both set up in this world the classic totalitarian distinction between the good “us” and the bad “them”—with the “them” singled out for second-class status or death once real control occurs.
lebel says
“the answer here is an easy one, to wit, Muslims try to get away with as much as possible and right now because loads of kuffaars still remain grossly ignorant of what Islam intends for us all (this would include Fox executives) it’s time for a wretched person like Omar to “push the envelope” in the direction of Mo’s creed just a little bit more by way of displaying an Islamic equivalent of the swastika—the hijab.”
Right but the religious obligation is to LIE to the non-Muslims by feigning friendship etc where does it say to push the envelope? War is deception not push the envelope. OR maybe, just maybe, Omar has never heard of taqqiya and all the other nonsense that is printed on this site. I know, it’s unthinkable, and because you cannot be wrong on Islam then you will dismiss this as yet another lie. But if you really think about it, it is the simplest explanation. In other words, there is no worldwide infiltration plot using taqqiya to implement sharia law via Obama and Omar and all these other US politicians unlucky enough to be born Muslim.
Unthinkable, I know.
Wellington says
Uh, lebel, you don’t have to lie to the kuffaar if the kuffaar is too ignorant respecting what you’re really up to. This was my main point which you missed—N.B., you miss a lot.
And Omar has never heard of taqqiya? Yeah, right. Really, lebel, you will have to do better than this. You are slipping even underneath your own low standards. You’re sinking fast. Well, all do eventually who defend the worst religion of all time, it being only a matter of degree.
As for “nonsense that is printed on this site,” can you provide me and others a few examples of Robert Spencer ever providing nonsense about Islam? Sure, a commenter here and there will provide nonsense in their post (you come to mind), but when has Spencer ever provided nonsense about Islam?
As for a “worldwide infiltration plot,” you have set up another straw man and then knocked it down. Reading too much of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion lately, et al., eh, lebel?
Meanwhile, over 34,000 documented Islamic terrorist attacks have occurred worldwide just since 9/11, never mind the hundreds of millions slaughtered in Islam’s name and probably a billion or more not slaughtered in Islam’s name but whose lives were made miserable PRECISELY because of Islam—especially those of the female gender.
Gettin’ my drift, lebel? And remember, I never give up. Never.
gravenimage says
Pious Muslims do what it takes to advance the cause of Islam.
And there *are* Muslims who are brave and principled enough to leave Islam–but most do not.
Kay says
Of course there are many countries in the world where that second class status is suffered by Christians, where Christians are persecuted by Islamic Oppression. Some of these used to predominantly or majority Christian.
Demsci says
“RS tells me”? No, he SHOWS you, therefore in a way, Islamic texts and part of Muslims, not all, themselves THEY tell you. it may be they tell you other contradicting tenets too, but that then makes Islam and Muslims in contradiction with each other.
RS showed in the above article extensively the anti-semitic content of the Islamic most important guiding texts. Ilhan Omar did make stereotyping remarks about all Jews, not just specific Israeli or American Jews. Thus anti-semitic remarks. She is clearly a practicing Muslima, shown by the Hijab.
So, is it unfair to ask if maybe her anti-semitic remarks were inspired by anti-semitic Islamic sources, Scholars, Education, general opinion among a part, not all, of the Muslims?
The evidence as shown by RS is so overwhelming, it is long since that the burden of proof is on Islam-apologists.
This question is not nearly adequately enough answered by Islam-apologists, instead they protest against it. With added arguments that are strawman or like that Omar does not adhere to ALL sharia-laws, suggesting that she adheres to NONE, that she is NOT influenced AT ALL by the obvious Islamic anti-semitism.
Being Muslim does necessarily entail an unbreakable connection to Islamic doctrine. The only question is about interpretation. And maybe this is variable. Maybe that is your biggest point, Lebel, that Islam as a whole really is multi-interpretable, to the point of being effectively very contradicting, ambiguous, unclear and often confusing. You seem quite confused.
Dennis Pasek says
Demsci makes a useful point in the last paragraph.
There is a fundamental characteristic of Islamic “ethics” that tends to be incomprehensible to most people who were raised in Western cultures.
That is the implementation in Islam of a very strong system of double standards: There is one set of rules for mozlems, and another, entirely different set of rules for Kafirs. There is no equality of anything when comparing the two groups under Islamic principles. This tends to be incomprehensible to most Westerners who have a basic understanding and acceptance of the concept of “equal rights” and “equal opportunities” for all people.
It is important to recognize that Islam does not work that way.
lebel says
“Being Muslim does necessarily entail an unbreakable connection to Islamic doctrine. The only question is about interpretation. And maybe this is variable. Maybe that is your biggest point, Lebel, that Islam as a whole really is multi-interpretable, to the point of being effectively very contradicting, ambiguous, unclear and often confusing. You seem quite confused”
I’d say you’re not far, it’s a religion and therefore there are a million ways to interpret it Even those that claim to be the true Muslims argue among themselves as to what is real Islam. The problem at jihadwatch is that the system can never be wrong. In other words her hijab is seen as evidence of Sharia but lack of hijab would also be evidence (of stealth sharia)! so it really does not matter what a Muslim says or does, the well is poisoned in advance. I hope you can see the logical steps that are derived from such an ideology?
Demsci says
Did you mean: “Muslims are damned if they do and damned if they don’t? Oh, as Trump supporter I can relate to that. And yes, I even like and validate your logic. As I do see this website as in the “district attorney against Islam corner”. Meaning that IMO it is perfectly OK if that IS the attitude of this site. As I expect both district attorneys and defenders of Islam to be biased.
I know that on JW even Zuhdi Jasser and Majid Nawaz are distrusted and that it IS controversial whether or not there is a meaningful distinction between the terms moderate and radical Muslims. And you, lebel, clearly are in favor of this distinction.
I think the more radical a Muslim is the more he is following the original Islam. But from Mordechai Kedar I take it that Islam is sort of “smorgasbord: and that a big part of Muslims, not all, can and do cherry pick from Islam to follow what they want, ignoring what they don;t want.
If I pursue this multi-interpretability of Islam-position to my heart’s content,
then I can say: Look, world, look Muslims, even if we believe everything both the radical and the moderate Muslims say, and there is no “taqqiyah”, then it is chrystal clear that Islam is very unclear, ambiguous, confused and confusing, contradictory, incomplete, obsolete (after 1400 yrs).
And if that became the dominant attitude towards Islam, it might lead to severe weakening of Islam, of severe lack of credibility, because of lack of reliable explanation of Islam as a whole and in every controversy.
Demsci says
And we know that the Quran says of itself that it is clear. And that Muslims in theory must believe that Allah cannot but be clear and faultless.
And in my experience the vast majority of Muslims will protest if Islam is described, as a whole and in many parts of its most important guiding texts, as: UNclear, Obsolete, Incomplete, contradictory, ambiguous, confused, confusing etc,
Muslims IMO cannot have it both ways; either Islam is clear but at least in part bad or it is multi-interpreted and thus multi-interpretable and so UNclear. And Islam cannot be changed one iota. And if it is unclear, then Allah did not do an effective job and even after 1400 years of misunderstanding and criticism, Allah never intervened with either an end of time or a new prophet.
It makes me wonder who a part of the Muslims will hate more: the infidel that says that Islam is bad but very clear in its badness. Or the infidel (like the leftists, like you) who in essence says that Islam is unclear etc. Because this infidel holds that good interpretations of Islam do exist but cannot now anymore deny the contradictory bad interpretations of Islam.
Demsci says
Finally, Islam has this tenet that apostasy is forbidden and very severely punishable. But that then means that those Muslims who, wherever in the world, spread an interpretation of a part of Islam that is in contradiction to the best Islamic Scholars (of Shafi, Hanafi, Hanbali, Maliki for instance) CANNOT be thrown out. A Muslim cannot be UNMUSLIMMED!
There is no central authority in Islam which decides what IS and IS NOT true, valid interpretation of the Most important guiding texts.
This IMO makes Islam unclear etc. Its apologists unreliable.
gravenimage says
I see that lebel is pretending that the savagery of Islam does not exist–ignore those 34,000+ Jihad terror attacks, you filthy Infidels!
Then–even worse–he is pretending that the problem is those appalled by the barbarism of Islam, rather than the Jihadists.
Of course, for him, this is probably all too true. He likes his Kuffar as dhimmified as possible, and in denial over Islam.
Dennis Pasek says
Taqiyya is a blanket term as used by most Kaffirs (Infidels) due to its ready recognition by the widest audience in a way that is synonymous with ‘Sacred Deception’ . There is a bit more detail of which most non-mozlems are unaware.
Omar is practicing a form of sacred deception known specifically as “Muruna – ‘Blending in’ by setting aside some practices of Islam or Sharia in order to advance others.” and probably a mix of some of the others.
She is not concealing her mozlem identity, so technically she is not engaging in Taqiyya.
See:
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/taqiyya.aspx
CRUSADER says
https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/jan/06/facebook-posts/facebook-group-no-2-owner-fox-news-prince-alwaleed/
Prince Alwaleed WAS the No. 2 owner of Fox News (technically, 21st Century Fox, the giant movie and TV corporation that owns the network). It’s one of his many Western investments.
It’s not known who he sold his shares to or exactly when. Prince Alwaleed was arrested by Saudi authorites last week as part of an anti-corruption crackdown.
https://deadline.com/2017/11/murdoch-ally-sells-fox-stake-1202204210/
Vito says
Great comment Crusader!!! Just follow the money!! Start with the Saudi’s!
Jay says
Jeannine Pirro is an articulate smart woman giving her opinion of the treasonous Omar! Omar is a traitor to everything the USA and our constitution stands for. Why she was allowed to be sworn in on a Koran which is also anti-American?? Why was she not punished for her anti-semitism and false remarks about Pres Trump? Hopefully justice will prevail against the crimes committed by Omar, Tlaib, and Ocasio.
Three investigations are underway!! I will now boycott liberal lying Fox News forever!!
A double standard I can no longer overlook.
Thank the lord we have Pres Trump to stop the insanity and put America first. ????????????
Trump 2020 ???????????
Jay says
And hijabs are not allowed in the house chambers – why is she allowed to wear it????
Another disgusting double standard by the lying liberal democrats!! Wake up America before it’s too late!
????????
Ren says
Jeanine is right. Sharia is endorsed by all true muslims.
sheliak says
Good for Pirro for having the courage to state an obvious truth. I appreciate that she used the word ‘antithetical’ to the US Constitution rather than ‘incompatible’.
Wellington says
I’m a full-fledged capitalist and think capitalism the only economic system which produces wealth and overall is the best economic system by far, but capitalism, like democracy, must be infused with wonderful things like common sense, a proper moral code, adequate knowledge and courage, otherwise it devolves into a sham version of itself.
Profits are a good thing, but when all one is interested in is profits, then that person will suffer in the long run as will capitalism. Just as with democracy, capitalism cannot function in a vacuum. Capitalism can no more be just about profits than democracy can be just about majority rule. One grasps this or should grasp it. Right now, it appears that Fox executives do not.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Wellington.
abad says
+1
CRUSADER says
Wellington ~
Andrew Puzder would agree with you about Capitalism.
Indiana Tom says
Not so sure FOX is quite so Capitalist in the long run.
DHazard says
Christopher Hitchens once addressed an Iranian/American woman also making more or less the same claim; that Islam has and continues to give women MORE rights than are afforded their non-Muslim friends. The clip is now widespread but the delusion of Islamic feminism still clings to life:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXjm31Bvomo
Making blatant indefensible lies is one of several approaches used by the left to achieve their long term goals. Then they just continue with the lie longer than people remain interested, even weathering law suits, fines and imprisonment. After that one might think, “Maybe Jussie was really attacked.”
CRUSADER says
The heavy sister in the video clip seems very deluded.
What does she gain by seeking freedom in her version of Islam
when she already has sufficient freedom where she resides in the West?
gravenimage says
I miss Hitchens.
DHazard says
Pretty much EVERYBODY knows that Allah/Muhammad has commanded all women to wear the hijab. If you think otherwise you are not fit for political office. If you think otherwise, and are female, you are an enabler of the men and women who enforce Shariah’s dated and unjust crimes. Rhetoric is usually just annoying, but it can also be dangerous. Better to think for oneself.
Debi Brand says
Oren Wysocki says
It is amazing with what ease a single muslim black woman can take on the entire lying leftist majority of americans and defeat them in their lies, and all they can do is run away and hide, censoring discourse on the matter. This black muslim woman openly says to fox news, I appreciate you criticizing judge Jeanine, but the hijab is mandated by sharia, and I do follow the sharia. Openly saying she is a discriminator of non muslims, but who in the American media is going to report it if fox news runs away with their tails between their legs? There is no substantive movement among Jews or christians enforcing violence on non believers who break discriminatory religious commandments.
The American establishment is done for, they have nothing left, a black man or a muslim can openly say they are racist, and the American media will censor them if they can, or apologize for them, or worst of all, accept their abuse. Trump is promoting the lie of peace with islam without discussing their supremacist motives, not that one politician can do much if every single publication in the country refuses to report any evidence of muslim intentions to destroy America and establish themselves supreme. If the government of Israel accepts American leadership as to how they should manage islams continuing war against the Jewish people and nation, then they are fools, deserving of dhimmitude. I don’t think the people of Israel would support continuing the lies if they were exposed to real arguments against declaring peace. Its like declaring peace numerous times while your people are still being murdered by the enemy, and you never acknowledged the war in the decades that it has continued for in the first place. In G-d I trust.
CRUSADER says
Trump has been doing what he can, given that he has been surrounded by a Swamp.
Isabellathecrusader says
Even though Ilhan is gloating now, Judge Jeanine let the cat out of the bag. JJ doesn’t seem like a “backer-downer” even to keep her show. If she did, who of us would continue to watch it?
Jeanine I totally support you, girlfriend, in putting your money where your mouth is. Otherwise you might as well join Ilhan in covering up. Cover your head, cover the truth. Same difference.
CRUSADER says
If any more of us cover-up, we’d all have to head for cover !!!
Nice one, Isabella….
revereridesagain says
Shame on FOX, and of course Judge Jeanine has no reason to apologize for speaking the truth! What else would compel FOX to demand such an apology except the “crime” of correctly identifying the meaning of a RELIGIOUS doctrine? Because it has to do with a god, we must all turn our heads and pretend not to know what it means? Lest the people who believe in the dictates of this god be offended by this identification of the true meaning of “his” imaginary commands? Including that this god commands women to hide their “adornments” except from a laundry list of entitled males and oh, yeah, their SLAVES because that is “what their right hands posses” refers to? We are all supposed to turn our heads away from reality to spare the sensibilities of people who believe such rot because it “comforts” them?
Judge Jeanine’s first commitment and loyalty is always to reality and therefore to justice. Which is why I admire he so much, and shame on FOX for even suggesting that she apologize to people for whom neither reality nor real justice have any meaning.
sidney penny says
“No one’s commitment to our constitution should be questioned because of their faith or country of birth.”…”
Really? and Why not?
Just saying we are committed to our constitution does not make it so.
gravenimage says
+1
CRUSADER says
Proof is ALWAYS in the pudding.
mortimer says
How about Ilhan Omar debating someone about the meaning of the veil? She would be defeated in about ONE MINUTE.
Muslims are UNABLE to defend most Islamic doctrines and so they ask that we MOVE THE GOAL POSTS so that the score in DEBATE is not 185 for the kafirs and 0 for Islam.
No intellectual argument may be found with which to defend Islam.
na says
Her thought ‘ all Jews are Zionist and their religion is Judaism.’. But South India you can see one of the lost tribe of Israel. They are not Jews. But Jewish Christians. They settled in India 2500 years ago from Middle east, Syria, Assyria, Persia, Africa and Mongolia converted to Christianity 2000 years ago. Look at their life after British conquest of India these people are below poverty.Pure tribal people. Their language was Syriac, which is similar to Aramaic. They are called Turayo(Street) Christians/Syrian Christians.. They got the name because that was a Jewish colony. So Jewish men used this girls for rice. But Jews so often visited their second wives. They are Afro- Mongol race pure Semitic with no money. They do nursing jobs for daily hood.very peaceful. Their religious text was Peshitho up to 1950. Now bible new testament. Now a days tribal tourism is on its peak. Many westerners visit this places to see ancient Jewish tribal people and to understand their culture.
na says
**Dravidian people are Afro-Mongol with Slight European genetics . But similar to Middle eastern Elamite. First nation.
CRUSADER says
Yawn.
………
Hey! Did you know that the Saudis are of a “Negroid” influence?
——————
Saudi Arabia | Patriot Act with Hasan Minhaj | Netflix
comedy !!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUhbZdvtzcw
….joking about Mecca as a word overused in society….
Mosquito Fao says
I was just thinking. Which often seems to be a very dangerous activity.
Everyone is making the argument against these elected officials on religious grounds. Bottom line that is a loosing argument. For example if I happen to belong to a religion that says all members should wear a unicorn horn on their head. Then guess what? I should be able to wear a unicorn horn anywhere I go. Even as a house representative. And if I wanted to be swarm into office on the holy book of the unicorn, so be it.
HOWEVER, if I wanted to take my oath of office on say the Soviet Union’s constitution or the constitution of North Korea, the highest laws of some foreign government, would that not create a legal issue regarding the validity of me oath of office?
Most if not all Islamic countries, for example Saudi Arabia, their government website states that the Qur’an is the highest law in their nation.
So the people, be it federal or local, taking their oath of office on the legally recognized text of the constitution of another nation, would that not indicate that the person is actually swearing allegiance to another Nation? Or at the very least indicating a serious question as to their intention to Carry out the oath of office?
Taking that one step more. Would it not also indicate that every supposed religious group which uses the constitution of a foreign nation as their alleged religious book, would this not make every one of the buildings a potential base of operation for a foreign government?
My thought is if the Qur’an could be legally defined as foreign government’s legal system being deceptively presented as a religion, the Islamic nonsense could potentially be shut down in America.
Of course I’m just thinking ‘out loud’ here.
But then all nation/world changing ideas have to start somewhere.
Sam says
Isn’t it strange we have a hijab wearing woman with antisemitic views in Congress and the whole main stream media is protecting her? And we are winning the war against Islam? Bull!
CT says
I believe that all people are the children of the same Heavenly Father. That means we’re all brothers and sisters, so no one needs to wear a hijab.
TKF says
Well, Fox caved to the outrage mob when Pirro is entirely correct. This Muslima is a Jew hater because her religion tells to be one. It’s Allah who commands believers to hate Jews, through the prophet and the Koran. Of course, the truth is politically incorrect. So, once again, reality takes it on the chin. The score is Political Correctness…1 The Truth….0
somehistory says
https://youtu.be/h1Ewwpt9bSY
‘However, at that time, she quickly walked that back, claiming that she was a fan of Obama. Of course, she is!
“Do you think President Obama is the same as President Trump?” asked Fox News reporter Guerin Hays.
“Absolutely not, that is silly to even think and equate the two,” responded the Islamic terror-tied congresswoman. “One is human, the other is not.”
https://thewashingtonstandard.com/muslim-rep-ilhan-omar-on-trump-obama-one-is-human-the-other-is-not/
UNCLE VLADDI says
Ilhan Omar is literally a Soros PUPPET – she was hired to play the part of a congresswoman after answering a casting call audition – she is an actress playing a part, whose lines are written by political operatives who hate America. PROOF?
See here, and here:
https://www.wnd.com/2019/03/shock-claim-ocasio-cortez-is-an-actress-a-puppet/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1h5iv6sECGU&t=9s