Mohammed Amin appointed himself the Sharia police in Sadiq Khan’s multicultural London. Khan has been cracking down on “Islamophobic hate speech” on the internet while actual crime soars. And now Amin felt free in Khan’s London to threaten a woman for not abiding by the Sharia dress code.
Today he was sentenced to an 18 month community order after being convicted of two counts of racially/religiously aggravated Section 4 Public Order Act offences against NHS staff on February 7.
This light sentence will likely not faze Amin, as he was acting upon the Islamic mandate that women must cover up (Quran 24:31, 33:59). That this kind of thing is happening now in London is a manifestation of the fecklessness of Western leaders, who are to blame for their tolerance of the intolerable, all in the name of “diversity” and “multiculturalism.”
“Man threatened Muslim woman because she was dressed in western clothing,” by Lorraine King, East London Advertiser, February 28, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
Police are urging Muslim women who have been intimidated or threatened for wearing western clothing to come forward.
Detectives have made the appeal after a man was today sentenced for threatening a female worker at a health centre in Bromley-By-Bow because of the way she was dressed.
Snaresbrook Crown Court heard Mohammed Amin also hurled abuse at a doctor he believed was a Christian and threatened him with violence if he was reported to police.
The 37-year-old, from Walthamstow, entered St Andrew’s Health Centre and gave a note to the Muslim worker stating that she was not following the Islamic dress code.
When her colleague confronted him he made threats towards the woman he gave the note to before targeting the doctor.
Today he was sentenced to an 18 month community order after being convicted of two counts of racially/religiously aggravated Section 4 Public Order Act offences against NHS staff on February 7….
Terry Gain says
There’s no point coming forward. The fanatic will only get a slap on the wrist, if anything, and your life will be in danger.
keith Oades says
And this is the mentality that will let these animals win.
Frank Anderson says
K.O. this is the mentality of the judges who impose meaningless sentences or refuse to convict. As long as this is the rule, “They” ARE winning. In the meantime, all who resist, whether from speaking the truth (“hate speech”) or exercising the duty of self-defense, are punished far more severely than any muslim. Not a pleasant situation to behold, much less to face up close and personally.
Terry Gain says
Good one Frank. I’ve read too many of Keith’s Oadius comments to believe he is opposed to Islam.
Frank Anderson says
T.G., not necessarily. The first vital step to solving a problem is to finally and irrevocably declare (recognize) that it is a problem. The second step is to be so disturbed and dissatisfied as to be committed to taking action. The third step is to rationally consider the available options and value the potential outcomes for making the choice of action to be taken, Then the feedback process begins to evaluate and correct actions to achieve the desired result.
I don’t think one would consider people for whom sympathy and support are extended to be animals. I see far too much struggle here with the first step. As long as people torture themselves with indecision about whether islam is a Constitutionally protected religion instead of an ongoing criminal conspiracy to conquer, enslave and murder a lot of cynicism is well placed.
J D.S says
Watch what’s happening when Muslims are elected to positions of power..look st London..Look what’s happening in our own government..and what will happen.
IF MUSLIMS BELIEVE WHAT’S TAUGHT IN MOSQUES, SPELLED OUT IN THEIR CONSTITUTION (THE KORAN) HADATH..JURISPRUDENCE, etc then they CAN’T BELIEVE AND PROTECT OUR CONSTITUTION….
When they are sworn into office they should be required to disavow any belief in Islamic teachings…Any document that allows MURDER or any if the ATROCIOUS acts as well as complete reversal if our laws, that is found in Islam, is AGAINST the American constitution so anyone believing in such should be classed as a traitor and how can a traitor hold office?
Frank Anderson says
J.D.S. I have had to deal with liars, cheats, thieves, cowards and bullies all my life. Anyone, such as we are, who knows one thing about them, including muslims: That lies are always to be expected whenever advantage can be obtained. Islam made lying an original and essential part of its teaching, and cannot change that teaching because the whole house of cards will fall (Allowing one rule to change means others can change). Where Judeo-Christian teaching specifically includes the words “Thou shalt not bear false witness” Islamic teaching specifically includes the contrary.
Any oath or promise made by a muslim to an infidel is meaningless, as was shown by the perfect muslim when he promised safe passage and then slaughtered a community of Jews who dropped their weapons and left their fortified village in reliance of his promise. So any promise today, made by any follower of the “final, perfect, complete, unchangeable” teachings of islam is nothing but lies and hot air which only a fool in a complete state of denial and delusion would accept. We know better and have better sense.
To me the most concise explanation to support this evaluation is Spencer’s Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam, which in 117 pages makes clear why trust is totally out of place with islam. Along with that start Bill Warner’s Abridged Koran is a good second step on a long road to understanding. In addition to reading here I have now read about 20 related books by a spectrum of authors, and still know that I don’t know everything. But I will continue to learn. The more we know the better chance we have to win.
Josephine says
it should be 18 years with bubba, not 18 mo. of community service; what a travesty islam is and always will be; pure stupidity
elee says
+1
Will says
The travesty is the justice system. It has become one law for us and another for them.
elee says
Hey West wake up, these guys are thugs.
John Allan says
‘Amin … was acting upon the Islamic mandate that women must cover up (Quran 24:31, 33:59).’
The twat is still stuck in the middle ages.
Terry Gain says
I find the description of Islam as 7th century or Middle Ages rather interesting given that, in terms of enlightenment, Islam is pre-Christian. And in fairness to Jews, pre-Judaic.
Noel says
Please explain. Christianity came before Islam and, in terms of enlightenment, Islam is yet to be enlightened.
A_M_Swallow says
Christianity was Jehadism plus Roman Empire. Lots of room for enlightenment there. Islam was second hand Jehadism plus what every was going on in the desert of Saudi Arabia.
karl anglin says
Interesting that this Moslem bully will not assault Moslem. men who wear Western clothing.
K WAGNER says
Castrate him and then maybe he won’t be as much of an ASSHOLE that he is
Terry Gain says
Any punishment of Muslims must comply with the law and must be humane. It is not necessary, wise or justified to descend to the level of an anti-religious ideology which prescribes horrific punishments.
Frank Anderson says
Since there is no US Constitution applicable in the UK, imagine what would be his change of view if he were given a complete sex change operation with all the hormonal trimmings? Would others be willing to follow his example? Even more draconian, after the operation, deport him/her to enjoy the vile teachings he loves so much now.
Terry Gain says
Frank, I must be a total wimp. All I want is that no more people who are adherents of that ideology be admitted into western countries and that the punishments for Muslim crimes be more sensible and not motivated by cowardice.
Frank Anderson says
T.G. unlike under islam, there is plenty of room for opinions; and my comment must be taken with a measure of “tongue in cheek”. I doubt under legal limitations my proposed handling would be enforced-but it is fun to speculate how it would be received, both by the perpetrator thus punished and all who would imitate him/her in future crimes. The punishments being imposed in the EU etc. reflect the fact they are set by muslims upon muslims in accordance with Islamic law (Sharia) instead of laws previously established by independent legislation.
Collaborators do not have to openly proclaim allegiance in order to collaborate. For example, I think Neville Chamberlain could be considered an un-proclaimed Nazi collaborator until he finally had no more room to waffle after the total takeover of Czechoslovakia. How many collaborators are tearing away at liberty today? “The proof of the pudding. . .” “if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, swims like a duck and looks like a duck, it is probably a duck.”
gravenimage says
Agreed, Terry.
Frank Anderson says
GI, remember what it took to control the muslim guerilla war in the Philippines following the 1898 Spanish American War. One account is that a number of muslim fighters were shot with pork lubricated bullets, and wrapped with pig skins for burial. One was spared and released to pass on the others what awaited them if they were captured. When the only recognized currency is sheer brutality, that is unfortunately the only one that will have a chance of success. Neville Chamberlain tried sweet-talk, appeasement and diplomacy. Only the brutality of invasion and massive bombing stopped the Nazis. How many times should a lesson be repeated before it is learned? 18 month community service sentences are a joke with no prospect of any change in behavior.
gravenimage says
Frank, I believe that the first thing we need to do is to keep more Muslims from flooding into the West–our main problem is that Muslims are here in our civilized lands.
After all, if we didn’t have Muslims here, we would not have these kinds of problems.
Then, we need to start vigorously enforcing the laws we do have. That is not what is happening here.
I think Amin needs a good stiff sentence, followed by deportation if he was not born in the UK, whether he is naturalized or not.
This is not, as you imply, appeasement. Chamberlain was not being tough when he threw Czechoslovakia under the bus–far from it. Of course this just further emboldened Hitler, as appeasement also emboldens Muslims.
As for the Philippines, most of these stories about Muslims being shot with pork fat-lubricated bullets and being buried in pig skins seem to be rather apocryphal–certainly General Pershing, to whom this is most often credited, never mentioned any such incidents himself.
In any case, I think we both agree that this slap on the wrist sentence is completely useless.
gravenimage says
I should have added that while it appears that Pershing did not use the methods described above, that this does not mean he went easy on these Jihadists. When they failed to disarm and continued shooting at his troops, he killed them.
He kept warning them that this would continue until they stopped their aggression–and he stuck to it.
Frank Anderson says
GI, I appreciate the clarification. I have learned through personal experience all my life that weakness invites aggression; and strength stops bullies. After the 8th grade, bullies thought twice before attacking me.
Rarely says
FA
It would not be a total surprise if his 18 months of community service was comprised of searching out muslim girls and ensuring they were correctly dressed.
Ashley says
LOL, Rarely!
No…it wouldn’t be a total surprise.
James Lincoln says
Terry, you stated:
“All I want is that no more people who are adherents of that ideology be admitted into western countries”
Agree. Both Poland a Hungary very publicly take it a step further – zero Muslim migrants –
and their countries are safe.
gravenimage says
Thank you, Frank. Always good to correspond with you.
You are right about bullies–anything less than a strong stand against them is, sadly, inviting more of the same. Same way with Muslim bullies.
Terry Gain says
Frank
I meant no disrespect. I rarely disagree with you.
Frank Anderson says
T.G. disagreement should never, but can be, taken as disrespect. I frequently disagreed with a law professor, a McGovern liberal, who taught me well things that I had not considered sufficiently. I think it should be very clear from my comments that I am a long way from being any description of liberal. I disagree with many people, who disagree with me. As long as they and I can agree to honestly question the issues and seek the truth, we can learn.
I keep remembering the 3 great lessons I heard the first time I visited a Jewish congregation:
1. Wisdom is its own authority, without regard to source or location.
2. Wisdom is all around us; but wherever in the hands of humans mixed with error and deception.
3. ASK EVERY question repeatedly; because we will never know the complete and true answer in this lifetime. That means we should even question our own answers and welcome honest disagreement as a key to better information.
CRUSADER says
Well, the American experience fighting the fanatical Moros in Philippines certainly did influence a change in caliber to .45 for military sidearms.
US soldiers pose with the bodies of Moro insurgents, Philippines, 1906
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/moro-insurgents-1906/
The bodies of Moro insurgents killed by US troops during the Battle of Bud Dajo in … 1906, during the Moro Rebellion phase of the Philippine–American War. …. eventually this led to the development of the caliber .45 pistol…
Frank Anderson says
Crusader. Indeed it did. If you compare the bullet size, weight and velocity of the “38” caliber, actually .357 in, and the present 9mm x 19 (actually .355 in) they are practically indistinguishable. The US sent back to stateside warehouses for 45 “Long Colt” revolvers to address the insufficiency of stopping power. If you compare the current 40 cal S&W, especially with the higher velocity loads, anything a 45 ACP will do in the numbers, the 40 will do a little better because of the higher pressure, while giving a smaller grip and more than double the magazine capacity.
If you read about the development of the 357 Sig, it is actually a 9mm bullet in a 40 S&W case that duplicates the performance of the 357 Magnum from a 4 inch barrel. That provides substantially improved power to quickly disable an attacker. The 45 is worthy of respect from tradition; the 40 to me has advantages and the 357 Sig should not be life out. But the 9mm is not a cartridge that I would want to be my life.
gravenimage says
UK: Muslim man threatens Muslim woman for wearing Western clothing
…………………..
And then he turned on the Christian man who came to her aid.
This is what Muslims call “enjoining the right and forbidding the wrong”.
This comes straight from the Qur’an. Sura 3.104:
“Let there arise out of you a band of people inviting to all that is good, enjoining what is right, and forbidding what is wrong: They are the ones to attain felicity.”
And what is “good”? Adhering to Islamic laws. This gives sanction to Shari’ah patrols.
If the state is not enforcing such laws, then individual Muslims believe they have the right to do so.
There is no sense in Islam as their is in Christianity and Judaism that this is a personal matter–in Islam, Muslims always have the right–as they see it–to impose their norms on everyone else, Muslim or not.
Sura 3.110:
“Ye are the best of peoples, evolved for mankind, enjoining what is right, forbidding what is wrong, and believing in Allah. If only the People of the Book had faith, it were best for them: among them are some who have faith, but most of them are transgressors.”
This last is a reference to Jews and Christians–that most of them do not conform to oppressive norms of Islam. They can be brutalized at any time by Muslims, as well.
Will this light sentence from Infidels deter the pious Mohammed Amin and those like him? I wouldn’t count on it.
Ashley says
Police are urging Muslim women who have been intimidated or threatened for wearing western clothing to come forward.
Detectives have made the appeal after a man was today sentenced for threatening a female worker at a health centre in Bromley-By-Bow because of the way she was dressed.
_________________________
This appeal by the authorities is a joke.
Police will likely advise the victim to wear a burka or hijab and stop bitching.
And what about NON-MUSLIM women who have been intimidated or threatened by Muslims? Why haven’t they been urged to come forward?
The UK has demonstrated, time and time again, that Muslims are deserving of preferential treatment.
As Terry stated, coming forward against a Muslim carries great risk, especially in the UK of today.
MTMLA says
Mohammed is just being a pious muslim…just like the prophet of his name..
A_M_Swallow says
Remember three strikes and you are out. Britain no longer has such a law but the sentences get worse on each conviction. Mohammed Amin has now had his first strike. The police have his photograph and finger prints which will make catching him easier next time. In court Mohammed Amin can no longer claim to be a man of impeccable character making it easier for the police to gain a conviction.
The principle that Muslims can be convicted of religious based unsocial behaviour has now been established. IMHO The police will use this power again.
Community orders are the new version of probation.
https://www.wwmcrc.co.uk/page.php?Plv=3&P1=11&P2=16&P3=19