The establishment media and Hamas-linked CAIR really want this jihadi back in the U.S., but there isn’t any real evidence that she has had any kind of change of heart.
Video: The treasonous ISIS bride has been such a sympathetic figure in the liberal media, but there’s one clip that needs to be shown more – When NBC’s Richard Engel asked her about a tweet calling on people to carry out terror attacks on Memorial or Veterans Day, she goes silent pic.twitter.com/hzVHlZ0WhA
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) March 4, 2019
“WATCH: ISIS Bride Who Wants To Return To U.S. Is Asked About Her Tweet Urging People To Slaughter Americans,” by James Barrett, Daily Wire, March 5, 2019:
The mainstream media has done its part in trying to promote the efforts of Hoda Muthana, the American-born daughter of a former Yemen diplomat who embraced radical Islam, urged the murder of innocent people while living in the States, journeyed to Syria in 2014 to fight alongside the barbaric terrorist group, and now wants to return to United States. Her biggest obstacle now is that both the Obama and Trump administrations determined that she isn’t even a citizen of the United States.
In an interview with NBC’s Richard Engel two weeks ago that has gotten more attention online this week after being highlighted by NewsBusters’ Curtis Houck, Muthana was asked why people should believe that she has actually renounced radicalism, particularly because of some of the tweets she posted. Muthana laughed and responded dismissively, “I know that, but it was an ideology that really was just a phase.”
“There’s one tweet in particular where you talk about calling on Americans to do drive-by shootings, to rent a truck to drive over people, spilling their blood — and you say Memorial Day, Veterans Day, go out and do it,” Engel said, speaking with Muthana inside her tent in a section of a Syrian refugee camp reserved for foreign ISIS families.
“Again, my lawyer told me not to speak about these things,” she responded.
Here’s a clip of the moment tweeted out by Houck:
As MRC reported in February, the media has covered Muthana in an overtly sympathetic way. In an interview with ABC News in February, the ISIS bride said she believes she deserves to be let back in the country and might just need some “therapy” as her “punishment.”
“Maybe therapy lessons,” she said in response to being asked about a just punishment for her joining a terrorist group. “Maybe a process that will ensure us we will never do this again.”
In another interview, CBS foreign correspondent Holly Williams made clear that she sympathized with Muthana, especially in light of Trump announcing via Twitter that he’d directed the State Department to deny her request because she “is not a U.S. citizen.” As evidence that Muthana did have a passport, Williams, incredibly, cited Muthana declaring proudly through her Twitter account (handle: “Umm Jihad”) that she’d thrown her passport into a “bonfire.”
CBS also gave Muthana’s lawyer, Hassan Shibly — whom Williams failed to tell the audience worked for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which has been accused of having ties to terrorists — a chance to make the case for his client. But Williams failed to fully explain the debate surrounding Muthana’s claim, which involves her father’s former role as a diplomat for Yemen and the timing of her birth….
gravenimage says
WATCH ISIS bride who wants to return to US when she’s asked about her tweet urging Muslims to slaughter Americans
…………………….
“That was just a phase”–not one that she particularly regrets, mind you. You’d think she was talking about her disco phase in high school, or her goth phase in college. A bit silly, perhaps, but not any thing she has reason to be ashamed of. Note, also, the creepy nervous laughter.
“My lawyer told me not to speak about these things”–if she were *really* regretful, she would be happy to talk about how she is now a different person, and deeply regrets any harm she has done. *None* of that was forthcoming.
Wellington says
Yes indeed. +1. And only more proof that NO Muslim should ever be trusted because either they’re lying or they’re confused. And relying upon the mendacious or those not clear-headed is invariably a stupid strategy.
gravenimage says
So true. There is *nothing* to indicate that this ISIS bride regrets anything except the collapse of the Islamic State.
christianblood says
gravenimage
Forget about this ISIS bride. US is giving billions of dollars and new weaponry to Saudi Arabia and Al-Qaeda in Yemen. More below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeIpNzJhuO0
christianblood says
gravenimage
Even far worse news is that Donald Trump is rushing to sell nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia/ISIS! More below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2FKn4aMOoQ
Wellington says
You’re so pathetic, christianblood, that you have managed to become a parody of yourself. No mean feat.
Get this once and for all: America and the West have made many mistakes where Islam is concerned. And then there are all the cruel necessities that America has been forced into because we live in a largely dysfunctional world (this dysfunctionality, btw, would include Russia which has NEVER embraced true freedom—but I digress).
And while you excoriate Trump for possibly selling nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia, and even assuming this is true, why don’t you excoriate Putin for doing the same thing with Iran?
Please, no more videos and links. Spare me. Argue in your own words. But you probably won’t. Indeed, I might even get from you yet another “Slavia” propaganda film so bankrupt are you of real ideas. But you do serve one very important function and that is just how crude, puerile, tendentious and ludicrous are continued defenses of Russia under Putin.
smoris says
US should sell or promote nuclear weaponry to NO ONE. Have you forgotten, Wellie, who was supposed to have been behind the 911 incident? Or doesn’t history matter to you? And as far as Iran goes, we were stupid enough to supply them at one time as well. Oh, that was under a different regime? Well, that makes it all better, doesn’t it? You ought to be adult enough if you are posting here to know that these regimes turn on a dime. None of them should be helped to any kind of weaponry beyond a butter knife by the US. You must not be awake yet. That’s got to be it.
Wellington says
smoris (or is it smorie?): I essentially agree that the US should not “sell or promote nuclear weaponry” but for geopolitical reasons it might want to use the possibility of doing this in order to have more leverage against a rogue state (with Japan as another example versus North Korea).
As far as Saudi Arabia is concerned, I find it a disgusting country which we for the present have to be allied with, much as we had to be allied with Stalinist Russia against Hitler’s Germany in WWII. And Stalinist Russia, no surprise, turned on us right after WWII (or even before said war was over—think Yalta here). These are the chances free polities at war have to take at times. I certainly hope you are mature enough to grasp this but your puerile comment directed towards me does not give me much hope.
As to who was behind 9/11, well that was al-Qaeda, made up to a large extent of Saudis living in Afghanistan (and elsewhere). So, your brilliant idea is that we should have gone into Saudi Arabia, not Afghanistan, after 9/11? Shrewd. Besides, like it or not (I don’t), Saudi Arabia is a major player on the world economic stage, Afghanistan not at all. This too is a factor in all of this and one knows this or should know it.
As for Iran, I am not clear as to the time you are talking about when the US supplied them. If you mean the stupid Obama deal with Iran, well, yes, that was appalling and fortunately Trump has pulled us out of that.
Hopefully if you respond to this you will be mature enough to do it in an adult manner this time. BTW, history matters very much to me. I taught it for 33 years, one year as a graduate student, three years at the high school level, and 29 years at the college level.
gravenimage says
christianblood wrote:
gravenimage
Forget about this ISIS bride.
………………………
*Of course* christianblood wants us to forget about this–he has said many times that he wants to see the West conquered by Muslims, starting with America.
And I have said may times that we should not be arming any Muslims.
Note that christianblood will not say the same about Russia arming Muslims, including enabling a nuclear Iran.
It is foolish for the US to give nuclear energy technology to the Saudis–I have said this, as well–but christianblood pretending this this is tantamount to giving ISIS nuclear weaponry is just absurd.
In fact, it is the US that has defeated ISIS territorially–something that christianblood constantly condemns us for, along with our having defeated the Fascists.
CRUSADER says
“NO Muslim should ever be trusted because either they’re lying or they’re confused.”
Now, would that statement — if made in Congress — be censored?
Frederick King says
There are a couple of theraties to fix her right up. Let the Syrians hang her, with the 100 + other ISIS Brides” there on death row. Or The Iraqis. Don’t ever forget. many Chechens are there. The Black Widows.
jayesouthworth says
Don’t let her back in, she’s a terrorist, she will come here and kill Americans. Keep her out!
mortimer says
Quote: “Maybe a process that will ensure us we will never do this again.”
Response: The only ‘process’ that can guarantee Muslims will abandon jihad is “ABSOLUTE DEPROGRAMMING” … a process of taking Muslims RIGHT OUT OF ISLAM through a UNIVERSITY-LEVEL study of the textual errors, historical errors, moral errors and logical errors within Islam.
Granted, most Muslims in the world suffer from extremely low IQs of less than 70 due to 50 generations of inbreeding.
gravenimage says
Mortimer, you keep flogging this as foolproof–but where has “ABSOLUTE DEPROGRAMMING” *ever* worked? Can you cite any examples? I know you never have been able to.
I also notice that this has evolved from “deprogramming” to “absolute deprogramming” to “ABSOLUTE DEPROGRAMMING” in your writing. I’m afraid emphasis does not really add anything of substance here.
James Lincoln says
I would also assume that the deprogramming is “forced”…
And what is the “test of cure”?
gravenimage says
If not forced, it would still have to be administered by Infidels–and pious Muslims do not listen to the ‘filthy Infidels’.
mortimer says
“ABSOLUTE DEPROGRAMMING” must be done by governments in a top-secret manner. It will require huge resources, but the mass dissemination of correct information about Islam’s vulnerabilities are the most effective way to bring Muslims RIGHT OUT of Islam. Many Muslims have been ‘absolutely’ deprogrammed, but it usually is self-administered and takes too many years. A top-secret, government-supported department should be created to do this essential job. They can use surrogates mainly in the process, but each prison should have programs to remove Islam from the minds of prisoners. We cannot wait for Muslims to do it themselves.
gravenimage says
Mortimer–with all respect–how can you claim that is effective if it has never been done?
mortimer says
GI, people are deprogramming Muslims every day. I have left several examples of this work. Evidently, you have not troubled yourself to listen, study and try out the methodology on Muslims. ‘Absolute’ is not an unreflective choice of wording. Islam is ‘absolute’ and Muslims are dogmatically absolute and so their absolute assuredness is difficult to assail. However, many are doing that successfully. Muslims must have their faith in Islam ‘absolutely’ destroyed, because if they remain half-Muslim, they give comfort and sympathy to the jihadists. Muslims must ‘absolutely’ break their ties with this vicious death cult. I am sad that so few well-meaning people are involving themselves in this effective work. I know from personal experience that it is effective. It is very sad that even at Jihad Watch (which is a vital aspect of deprogramming), few here understand why ‘absolute’ deprogramming should be government-funded… just as Gulf states fund Islamic, Salafist brainwashing around the world.
gravenimage says
Mortimer wrote:
GI, people are deprogramming Muslims every day. I have left several examples of this work. Evidently, you have not troubled yourself to listen, study and try out the methodology on Muslims.
…………………………
Of course I have listened to these videos, Mortimer–and I was familiar with most of them before you posted them here.
That a few disaffected Muslims have looked into Islam and decided to leave it is something I definitely applaud–the idea that that this has anything to do with Infidels–or apostate Muslims–being able to compel Muslims to leave Islam is *entirely* different.
Robert Spencer has written here scores of times about how these programs have been failures.
Now, sometimes this is because the Infidels in question are themselves ignorant of the ugliness of Islam–but not always.
The fact is that one cannot compel anyone else to change their beliefs, not matter how vicious and irrational those beliefs may be.
More:
‘Absolute’ is not an unreflective choice of wording. Islam is ‘absolute’ and Muslims are dogmatically absolute and so their absolute assuredness is difficult to assail. However, many are doing that successfully. Muslims must have their faith in Islam ‘absolutely’ destroyed, because if they remain half-Muslim, they give comfort and sympathy to the jihadists. Muslims must ‘absolutely’ break their ties with this vicious death cult.
…………………………
Just saying that Muslims can have their belief in Islam ‘absolutely’ destroyed does not make it so.
More:
I am sad that so few well-meaning people are involving themselves in this effective work. I know from personal experience that it is effective.
…………………………
How do you know it is effective? Where have Muslims ever been compelled by infidels to watch a few videos–no matter how brilliant their reasoning–and had Muslims automatically leave Islam? Citations. please.
It is not sad that people are not apt to chase this pipe dream.
More:
It is very sad that even at Jihad Watch (which is a vital aspect of deprogramming),
…………………………
I have noted before that the purpose of Jihad Watch is to educate Infidels about the threat of Islam–not to “deprogram” Muslims.
As sound as the arguments and logic are here at Jihad Watch, the content here does not automatically enlighten Infidels in denial over the threat of Islam–if it did, we would not face the threat we do today.
Even less does it automatically “deprogram” Muslims. Were that true, then Jihad propagandists like Ibrahim Itace Muhammed and Rezali Mehil, who have posted their vicious nonsense here for years, would have been “deprogrammed” long since.
And while there are brave apostates from Islam who post here, I have never seen a *single one of them* claim that they were “deprogrammed” by Jihad Watch. Odd, if this is happening constantly.
The above is no dig at Jihad Watch–there is no reason to suppose that it could accomplish such a thing, nor does anyone else here expect it to.
More:
few here understand why ‘absolute’ deprogramming should be government-funded… just as Gulf states fund Islamic, Salafist brainwashing around the world.
…………………………
Where has government “deprogramming” ever worked? I can tell you many places, unfortunately, where it has not.
CRUSADER says
As “SILENCE”, the Scorsese movie starring Liam Neeson demonstrated,
a believer cannot alter their deep seated belief even after all sorts of influence to do so.
gravenimage says
CRUSADER, some Muslims–including Jihadists–*have* left Islam. I am glad to see it. But this is not something we can compel Muslims to do–they have to want to do it.
Frederick King says
“Absolute Deprogramming ?” Easy. Hang her and the rest of the ones captured. These are the last, hard core lot. Probably kept and abused slaves. Killed slaves. Have a trial over there. Then hang them all. Use a Triple tree. Or an iranian crane show.
Wellington says
With respect, mortimer, how does your “”deprogramming option” differ from a Muslim simply giving up on Islam completely? I think you need to answer this, pal. Specifics here are imperative.
And I proceed on the assumption (hope you do too) that trying to rescue any of Islam and bring it into the modern world, especially the Western world where liberty has been most developed and explored, is a fool’s errand. Might as well try to rescue Nazism or Marxism and bring it into our time with kissy-face/huggy-bear anodyne nonsense written over all such attempts.
gravenimage says
I am *thrilled* when Muslims decide to leave Islam. But I don’t think that this is anything that Infidels can do for Muslims–or to them.
Wellington says
Well, gravenimage, at least in many instances I believe it is possible to raise enough doubts about the warped faith which is Islam in at least some Muslim minds so that a percentage of Muslims (hopefully a high percentage—the larger the percentage the better), dangerous as it often is (and thanks to Islam for this—you know, Sura 4:89, Bukhari Hadit 9.84.57, etc.), actually try to leave this wretched religious error known as “Islam.” And if Islam is not a religious error, then there is no such thing as a religious error.
In fact, Jihad Watch serves this purpose, among so many others here, no?
gravenimage says
Wellington, I think we should expose the ugliness and irrationality of Islam at every turn–as Robert Spencer does.
If some Muslims are effected by this, I am very glad–but I don’t expect it to happen, and certainly not as some sort of automatic “deprogramming” of Muslims.
mortimer says
Dear Wellington, thank you for your inquiry. Many people are already involved in this work, but there is no government coordination and funding of it. This is the problem. Anyone who studies the historical, textual, legal, scientific, ethical and logical questions within Islam and engages in POLEMICS against Islam is, in effect, deprogramming Muslims out of Islam. Government departments can finance this activity surreptitiously JUST AS THE GULF STATES SURREPTITIOUSLY and OPENLY FINANCE AND PROMOTE ISLAMIC DISINFORMATION. Saudi-funded literature is handed out on street corners all over the West.
Western governments need to stand behind the counterjihad or JIHAD propaganda funded by Muslim states will overwhelm the world.
I know this sort of deprogramming is very effective. I have witnessed the effectiveness. If you have not participated in this work, it is not surprising that you are unable to imagine it.
gravenimage says
Dear Mortimer–where are the Muslims you have personally “deprogrammed”?
If this has been so successful, they should be happy to post here, to give witness to the effectiveness of your methods.
I would be *thrilled* to see them. They can post under assumed names if they wish, given the danger of apostasy from Islam.
When can we expect to see their testimonials here?
gravenimage says
I certainly agree that we should be exposing Islam, rather than allowing vicious Da’wa here in Mosques and Majids and preached in the streets.
But–again–I do not expect any of this expose of the violence of Islam to automatically “deprogram” Muslims. For one thing, this presupposes that Muslims are ignorant of the savagery of their creed, and would be horrified if they knew about it,
But since Jihadists know all about the brutality of Islam and practice it themselves, this does not really hold water.
In fact, Muslims in ignorance or denial about the violence preached by their creed are overall less of a danger to us than are Jihadists–the very ones, one would think, most in need of “deprogramming”.
Wellington says
Thank you for your reply, mortimer.
Well, the key phrase I will focus on that you provided is “deprogramming Muslims out of Islam,” with special emphasis on the last three words here, which seem to me to indicate leaving Islam completely, my point by way of a query to you in my 5:47 P.M. post above.
Are we in agreement here?
CRUSADER says
If Muslims took more war booty, and grabbed with their right hands, they’d find more chances to breed with, and not have to inbreed so much.
Mortimer, have you considered that Irshad Manji may be the way to deprogram Muslims?
She apparently is still a Muslim but has been living life as a liberated liberal….
She evidently doesn’t appreciate labels, either, as her new book is titled, “Don’t Label Me”.
It’s about her conversation with her blind old dog.
Frederick Revell says
Imamsvall over the world support this ideology, while this lady seems not to be a threat she is part of an ideaolog and group that is a serious threat. She must stay where she is
gravenimage says
How is someone openly urging the slaughter of Americans not a threat?
mortimer says
GI is correct: jihadist bride is promoting and soliciting genocide.
gravenimage says
Thank you, Mortimer.
VRWC member77 says
Bring her back, try her for treason and when she’s convicted, force this dirty SLIME BALL Richard Engel administer the execution apparatus.
James Lincoln says
How about GITMO?
VRWC member77 says
When you give material support to an organization like the Islamic State – an organization that has beheaded and in some cases buried children alive – a quick execution is the best that individual could hope for as far as I’m concerned……GITMO would be a resort compared to what this vile pig deserves.
Georg says
From a strategic point of view you’d almost think CAIR might want nothing to do with her publicly and go on and on about how she and her actions have nothing to do with Islam (remember those days?). But no… The conditions are now right in the West for them to stand right by a snarling jihadist and denounce those who’d take exception. Quite a trajectory the West has found itself upon. Thank you CNN, Twitter, academia, invading socialists, no vetting of those who hate us and move right in anyway, and too many others to mention.
CRUSADER says
Yes.
It is about conditions in the West which offer the development of the next stage.
All to the agenda listed by Muslim Brotherhood.
Quite a timeline and flowchart to follow, it would seem.
Need to make some coffee…
WAKE UP!
++++++++
Arthur says
What is wrong with her life now under her beloved sharia law she wants to go back to “bad, devilish USA” she hated and wanted to destroy?
somehistory says
She made her choice based on islam. She married 3 terrorists who were active in murdering, spilling blood, raping, beating, torture…all of the classic demands of islam’s unholy book.
She had a child by one of the terrorists she married. It’s possible she had some hand in the beatings of the young Yazidi’s who were captured, raped, tortured, and enjoyed her part.
She left home at 19….now claiming she was just a kid being manipulated by the terrorists and held back from being free to have friends, etc. by her parents. She chose to go with the “manipulators” and engage in terrorism.
She encouraged others to commit terrorism…in this country…which she chose to leave because it is an unhappy place for moslims…moslims can’t be “free” here. She called for her bros and sisters in America to run us over, to spill a lot of our blood and spoke of the evil we do.
Now she is 24. five years after she left this “hated” country and those she wished to kill.
It is only recently that isis was defeated to the point that all of her husbands are dead…her child is under two years old.
However, after just a few short weeks….she is ready to stop her terrorism and calling for terrorism against us…? There is no reason to believe her. Not only do moslims lie to further islam’s goals….they lie when they are caught in the act of terror or criminality.
She wants us to believe her, because she knows she hasn’t much chance of getting back in to the country if no one does believe her.
She still wears the scarf that shows her submission to the beast…and submission to the beast means a willingness, and a readiness to murder for the ’cause.’
The video wouldn’t play for me. But the fact that she laughed, and that she wouldn’t talk, citing her lawyer…the moslim creep…proves her claims of being no longer a danger or threat…no longer wanting to kill us or encourage others to do so…is a big fat lie.
Ren says
Don’t tell the truth, don’t tell people what you really think, muslima.
abad says
Muthana can stay in Syria and help rebuild it. No need for her to be in the United States.
Thinker1 says
We can make sure she does not do it again. The death penalty.
mortimer says
You cannot understand ISLAMIST and JIHADIST women (or men) like this unless you study the Islamic teaching of AL WALAA WAL BARAA that requires hatred directed towards the dirty, disbelieving KUFAAR ‘for the sake of Allah’.
Allah hates dirty KAFIRS, so Muslims should hate them too.
Please study this doctrine and teach it to others and we can defeat ISLAMISM and JIHADISM …
http://westindanger.com/wb/walaa-baraa.html
gravenimage says
Most of us here understand this very well.
CRUSADER says
It is good to state openly, however, as there may be new readers who have come to the site.
gravenimage says
This is true.
timgibson2330 says
God divided groups of people by language at the tower of Babel. Muslims claim that the Koran cannot be truly understood unless you know arabic. God didn’t intend for Arabs to live around us. Send them back.
Since a good moslem isn’t supposed to emigrate to where they can’t worship freely then let’s outlaw Islam.
gravenimage says
Any language can be translated. Sometimes small nuances can be lost, but not basic meaning. We know *all too well* what the vicious texts of Islam teach.
Terry Gain says
Mortimer
We can’t defeat Islam until we have political leadership that is willing to speak the truth about Islam. 9/11 ought to have been more than enough, but it wasn’t. In fact with the election of Hussein Obama 7 years later the response has been appeasement.
I don’t see the situation changing another terrifying event. I believe that it will take another 9/11 or the fall of a European nation to awaken the American. Given my love for America, I am hoping Sweden falls sooner than later.
gravenimage says
Terry, I don’t actually think that an Islamized Europe would make us safer, I’m afraid. For one thing, it would tend to normalize the Islamization of the West.
Kepha says
Mortimer and Terry: I don’t see the fall of Sweden or some other European country as sufficient to awaken America. I believe it would encourage more of our radical young to grow even more pro-Islam, and further strengthen the Unholy Alliance of the Left and Islam on our own shores.
We need a widespread change of heart on a lot of issues here in the USA. We need a major debunking of the Leftist narratives; a frank admission that Puritan theology had something to do with the rise of our system of limited government (When our government curriculum called on us to teach the Mayflower Compact, I introduced some of the theology behind it; pointing out Puritanism’s mistrust of fallen human nature); and pointing out that Malcolm X, far from being a hero, aligned himself with a civilization that abolished slavery only at the point of Britain’s and France’s maxim guns. Some public shaming of the more radical imams would do a bit of good, too.
May RObert Spencer’s tribe of Islam-critics increase!
CRUSADER says
Look to what the BREXITers seek, and the rising leadership of Poland, Hungary, Austria seek.
Control over our own destinies as cultures and as a people. Not to kowtow to EU dictate.
Not to yield to ignominious immigration policies of self destruction.
Read further in “Jihadist Psychopath” by Jamie Glazov.
Kepha says
Hoda Muthana expressed an ugly and un-American ideology. I certainly despise Islam, and refrain from invoking the name of God here because I am taking Christ’s “Let your yea be yea and nay, nay” seriously. But is Hoda Muthana fundamentally any different from Hanoi Jane Fonda, who went to North Viet Nam and publicly cheered for the side her country and its allies were fighting?
From what I understand, Hoda Muthana is a US citizen under the definition given in Amendment XIV. Her father was no longer in diplomatic status when she was born in the USA. Hence, should the Trump administration face a legal challenge here, I cannot see how it can prevail–unless our courts wish to set a dangerous precedent of stripping citizenship by executive branch decision, which can later be used against patriots who criticize the O’s and AOC’s once they get in power, or Muthana’s lawyer prefers political grandstanding to actually arguing his client’s case.
Frankly, stripping people of citizenship apart from some narrow situations defined in our law (the late King Bhumibol Adulyadej was a case in point: he was born in Massachusetts while his father was getting a degree, and later went on to become head of state in Thailand) bothers me. I’m old enough to remember the Soviet Union doing that to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, perhaps one of the greatest men of the 20th century. The whole idea stinks of a totalitarian state that brooks no opposition to the Great Leader or the ruling Party Line. That, to me, is fundamentally un-American.
This being said, I would have no qualms about Hoda Muthana being issued a passport valid only for return to the USA, and perhaps being escorted home in handcuffs by some FBI or MP sent over for the purpose. If we have no such agreement with Iraq, let our law enforcement board her plane as soon as it lands in the USA, and take her off in handcuffs–child in tow and all the rest.
Lisalles says
If she is found to be a citizen of the US…if her lawyer wins the lawsuit, then let her back and try her for treason. Treason is NOT a phase. Ignorance is no excuse for breaking the law. Hopefully, the government is considering a plan B if her lawyer wins.
CRUSADER says
Ask the traitor Benedict Arnold, if possible.
He found that his “phase” phased him out.
He lost his raison d’être and he lost his honor.
na says
She is too dangerous. One of my friend married a Jihadi. That was an arranged marriage . First night she told him “Im a trained jihadi .An engineer. I want to blow myself up. These is something inside my a**hol”. He was scared and moved quickly . So he escaped hardly.
CRUSADER says
Quite a CAIR-ful Muslima…..
….and all “lawyered up”….
She can’t figure how to deploy TAQIYYA any further in this video clip interview.
So she goes mum.
SamB says
Begum and Mothana possibly discussed the killing Syrians , Kurdish, Christianity and possibly Americans, too with their husbands and lovers. On this basis they are citizens in need of love and empathy, we are told. We ponder for a seconds on those whom we saw losing their heads while their lovers shouted “Allahu al akhbar” and wonder on what basis they need to be incorporated into “dysfunctional societies” from which they extricated themselves. After all Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Indonesia , Pakistan etc.. the patrons of the esteemed prophet and upholders of Shari’a Law are ideal societies for any Moslem, why America and Britain?
Sam says
The point that we can discuss the subject of an evil cult member after committing treason and not denouncing her cult membership is insane. Left and Islam will not go away if we keep not fighting these evil ideologies by brutal force. Why does she not go to wonderful Islamic Saudi Arabia?
J D.S says
If she is actually a citizen of the U.S. go ahead and bring her back then try her for treason with a military tribunal then smartly execute her with a firing squad. If she is found not to be a citizen leave her there and Metairie take ACTION or bring her back try her in the courts and lock her away for life..that would mean tax payers would have to feed, clothe, shelter and medicate
Elizabeth Thorne says
Save taxpayers money–leave her there. Justine would deprogram her using colouring books and crayons. Good God how crazy this world has become but it is sweet that peoplekind are politically correct.
Giacomo Latta says
”Yes, I’m really a Yemeni and not an American, but have you seen the toilets there?”
Anne says
I can’t understand why Europe wants its ISIS traitors back and why ISIS prisoners are not being executed while still abroad considering the heinous crimes and mass murders they committed according to Kurdish Media, Dec. 2018:
“According to SOHR (Syrian Observatory for Human Rights) ISIS is known to have executed 6,191 prisoners on Syrian soil since 2014, often in a brutal fashion. Several executions were filmed and posted on the internet in propaganda videos, including the burning alive of a captured Jordanian pilot.
SOHR implored the US-led Coalition and the SDF to interrogate ISIS security officials to discover the whereabouts of mass graves and the fate of missing people.
Around 3,000 Yezidi women and girls are still unaccounted for, while 40 Kurdish Peshmerga fighters captured in battle are missing. “
Crusades Were Right says
What a pity she didn’t take her lawyer’s advice BEFORE publicly advocating for mass murder!
Rene says
The only therapy would be for her to publicly reject sharia.